Search

The present study extended minority stress theory by testing the associations of racist stressors (racist discrimination, expectations of rejection, and internalized racism) and maladaptive coping strategies (internalization and detachment) with psychological distress and psychological well-being. In addition, expectations of rejection, internalized racism, internalization, and detachment were tested as mediators of the racist discrimination–mental health link. Data were analyzed from 297 Asian American adults. Results indicated that greater levels of all racist stressors and maladaptive coping strategies were each associated with poorer mental health at the bivariate level, but only internalization and detachment were unique predictors of distress and only internalized racism and detachment were unique predictors of well-being. Internalization and detachment mediated the positive indirect association of racist discrimination with distress, and detachment mediated the negative indirect relation of racist discrimination with well-being. Implications of the findings for practice, advocacy, education, training, and research with Asian Americans are discussed.

Due to error of earth rotation parameters (ERPs) adopted when generating the broadcast ephemeris, GNSS ephemeris is subject to orientation deficiencies shown as constellational orbit rotation. Moreover, significant rotation inconsistencies are indicated among different GNSS ephemerides as they utilize different ERPs. Based on the ERP datasets from modernized GNSS broadcast navigation messages, we investigate the correlation between ephemeris rotation error and broadcast ERPs for GPS and BDS-3 systems, and then explore ephemeris rotation correction using broadcast ERPs. Compared to the rotation parameters derived from orbit comparison, we demonstrate that the GPS and BDS-3 broadcast ephemeris rotation errors exhibit a prominent correlation with broadcast ERPs. The correlation coefficients between polar motion errors and X/Y-axis rotation parameters exceed 0.88 for GPS and 0.77 for BDS, whereas no significant correlation is found between the UT1-UTC error and the Z-axis rotation parameter. Thus, we propose a method to correct the orbital orientation inconsistencies between BDS-3 and GPS by aligning their broadcast ERPs, explicitly the polar motion. The GPS broadcast ERPs are utilized as a reference due to their higher precision and real-time availability. After rotation correction, BDS-3 broadcast ephemeris reveals an orbit precision improvement of approximately 3.0 and 1.0 cm in the along-track and cross-track components, respectively. Using this method, we also evaluate the impact of rotation errors on GPS and BDS-3 combined precise point positioning based on broadcast ephemerides. A remarkable positioning improvement is indicated from 8.9 cm to 6.9 cm in the north direction after BDS-3 ephemeris is corrected., The 28th IUGG General Assembly (IUGG2023) (Berlin 2023)

Supplemental Material for A Test of Minority Stress Theory with Asian Americans by Nina Lei, Brandon L. Velez, Judy M. Seoud, and Wei N. Motulsky in The Counseling Psychologist

Frailty predicts adverse perioperative outcomes and increased mortality in patients having vascular surgery. Frailty assessment is a potential tool to inform resource allocation, and shared decision-making about vascular surgery in the resource constrained COVID-19 pandemic environment. This cohort study describes the prevalence of frailty in patients having vascular surgery and the association between frailty, mortality and perioperative outcomes.The COVID-19 Vascular Service in Australia (COVER-AU) prospective cohort study evaluates 30-day and six-month outcomes for consecutive patients having vascular surgery in 11 Australian vascular units, March-July 2020. The primary outcome was mortality, with secondary outcomes procedure-related outcomes and hospital utilization. Frailty was assessed using the nine-point visual Clinical Frailty Score, scores of 5 or more considered frail.Of the 917 patients enrolled, 203 were frail (22.1%). The 30 day and 6 month mortality was 2.0% (n = 20) and 5.9% (n = 35) respectively with no significant difference between frail and non-frail patients (OR 1.68, 95%CI 0.79-3.54). However, frail patients stayed longer in hospital, had more perioperative complications, and were more likely to be readmitted or have a reoperation when compared to non-frail patients. At 6 months, frail patients had twice the odds of major amputation compared to non-frail patients, after adjustment (OR 2.01; 95% CI 1.17-3.78), driven by a high rate of amputation during the period of reduced surgical activity.Our findings highlight that older, frail patients, experience potentially preventable adverse outcomes and there is a need for targeted interventions to optimize care, especially in times of healthcare stress.

China’s economic reform since the late 1970s has inaugurated a societal restructuring, with profound changes taking place in the outlook on wealth and fortune. In recent years, a distinct group of social actors, the shan’erdai, comprised of the children of the super wealthy, has emerged to play a significant role in social welfare and charity projects. Though there has been some discussion about philanthropy in general and its realization in China in particular, the shan’erdai has received little scholarly attention. This paper identifies some of the defining characteristics of the shan’erdai and examines a modern form of Chinese philanthropy that the shan’erdai practice. Drawing on interviews and publication reviews, we specifically address two central questions: What are the motivations, values, and practices of the shan’erdai? How do the motivations, giving patterns, and modes and technologies of the shan’erdai differ from the parental generation? We sketch the contours of the shan’erdai as a social group and explore the ways through which this shan’erdai experiments with new forms of philanthropy, charity, and social entrepreneurship. Shaped by social and historical formations domestically and on the global stage, we argue that the shan’erdai proactively reformulates the logics of social action for the public good and inspires a novel form of philanthropy in China.

Clay mineral plays a crucial role in determining permeability and affecting mechanical properties of caprock formations in geologic carbon sequestration (GCS) and enhanced oil recovery (EOR) engineering. In the corresponding environment, CO2–H2O intercalation not only causes swelling or shrinkage of clay mineral but also results in affecting mechanical properties of mineral. However, influence of quantitative CO2/H2O adsorption on mechanical properties of clay still remains unknown. This work investigated evolutions of elastic properties of Ca-MMT with variable CO2–H2O component using molecular dynamic method. Elastic coefficients Cij, bulk modulus K, shear modulus G, Young’s modulus Eii, and Poisson’s ratio Eij were correlated to qualified adsorption of CO2–H2O mixture. We obtained the following conclusions: (1) in-plane elastic constants, bulk modulus, shear modulus, and Young’s modulus E33 had distinct correlation with the profile of d001 spacing as a function of H2O content at fixed CO2 content; (2) n...

Background Abnormal glucose metabolism have been suggested to be involved in the development of hypertension. The present study aimed to investigate the associations and potential interactions of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) with other factors on the risk of hypertension among Chinese non-diabetic adults. Methods As a cross-sectional survey, the current work provided questionnaire survey, anthropometric tests and biochemical measure for each of the eligible participants. The HbA1c levels were quantified and grouped by quartiles. The correlation between HbA1c and hypertension risk in non-diabetic were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. For evaluating the interactive effects, the parameters of Relative Excess Risk due to Interaction (RERI), Attributable Proportion due to Interaction (AP) and Synergy Index (SI) were calculated, respectively. Results In the current study, 1462 non-diabetic subjects were enrolled. Totally, the prevalence of hypertension was 22.4% (n=327) in the individuals without diabetes. When the HbA1c levels were grouped by quartiles, it was revealed that the prevalence of hypertension substantially elevated across groups ( P for trend

Advances in sensor technologies, object detection algorithms, planning frameworks and hardware designs have motivated the deployment of robots in warehouse automation. A variety of such applications, like order fulfillment or packing tasks, require picking objects from unstructured piles and carefully arranging them in bins or containers. Desirable solutions need to be low-cost, easily deployable and controllable, making minimalistic hardware choices desirable. The challenge in designing an effective solution to this problem relates to appropriately integrating multiple components, so as to achieve a robust pipeline that minimizes failure conditions. The current work proposes a complete pipeline for solving such packing tasks, given access only to RGB-D data and a single robot arm with a vacuum-based end-effector, which is also used as a pushing finger. To achieve the desired level of robustness, three key manipulation primitives are identified, which take advantage of the environment and simple operations to successfully pack multiple cubic objects. The overall approach is demonstrated to be robust to execution and perception errors. The impact of each manipulation primitive is evaluated by considering different versions of the proposed pipeline, which incrementally introduce reasoning about object poses and corrective manipulation actions.

The most recent high-precision data on spin observables $��$, $T$, $P'$, $E$, $F$ and $H$ reported by the CLAS Collaboration together with the previous data on differential cross sections and spin-density-matrix elements reported by the CLAS, A2, GRAAL, SAPHIR and CBELSA/TAPS Collaborations for the reaction $��p \to ��p$ are analyzed within an effective Lagrangian approach. The reaction amplitude is constructed by considering the $t$-channel $��$ and $��$ exchanges, the $s$-channel nucleon and nucleon resonances exchanges, the $u$-channel nucleon exchange and the generalized contact current. The latter accounts effectively for the interaction current and ensures that the full photoproduction amplitude is gauge invariant. It is shown that all the available CLAS data can be satisfactorily described by considering the $N(1520)3/2^-$, $N(1700)3/2^-$, $N(1720)3/2^+$, $N(1860)5/2^+$, $N(1875)3/2^-$, $N(1895)1/2^-$ and $N(2060)5/2^-$ resonances in the $s$-channel. The parameters of these resonances are extracted and compared with those quoted by PDG., 22 pages, 17 figures, version to appear in PRD

First measurements of double-polarization observables in $��$ photoproduction off the proton are presented using transverse target polarization and data from the CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer (CLAS) FROST experiment at Jefferson Lab. The beam-target asymmetry $F$ has been measured using circularly polarized, tagged photons in the energy range 1200 - 2700 MeV, and the beam-target asymmetries $H$ and $P$ have been measured using linearly polarized tagged photons in the energy range 1200 - 2000 MeV. These measurements significantly increase the database on polarization observables. The results are included in two partial-wave analyses and reveal significant contributions from several nucleon ($N^\ast$) resonances. In particular, contributions from new $N^\ast$ resonances listed in the Review of Particle Properties are observed, which aid in reaching the goal of mapping out the nucleon resonance spectrum., Two authors added, figures updated

A large number of etiological factors and the complexity of breast cancers present challenges for prevention and treatment. Recently, the emergence of microRNAs (miRNAs) as cancer biomarkers has added an extra dimension to the 'molecular signatures' of breast cancer. Bioinformatic analyses indicate that each miRNA can regulate hundreds of target genes and could serve functionally as 'oncogenes' or 'tumour suppressor' genes, and co-ordinate multiple cellular processes relevant to cancer progression. A number of studies have shown that miRNAs play important roles in breast tumorigenesis, metastasis, proliferation and differentiation of breast cancer cells. This review provides a comprehensive overview of miRNAs with established functional relevance in breast cancer, their established target genes and resulting cellular phenotype. The role and application of circulating miRNAs in breast cancer is also discussed. Furthermore, we summarize the role of miRNAs in the hallmarks of breast cancer, as well as the possibility of using miRNAs as potential biomarkers for detection of breast cancer.

A superoxide dismutase (SOD) with the molecular weight of 31,079 has been purified as a homodimer from Panax ginseng by employing neutral pH buffer extraction, ammonium sulfate precipitation, isoelectric point precipitation and ion exchange methods. The enzyme's specific activity determined by an improved Marklund method was 9480.43 U/mg. Metal analysis showed that the SOD contained iron with the stoichiometry of 0.9 ± 0.3 Fe/subunit and exhibited high thermal stability (70°C) over the pH range from 4.0 to 9.0. Its maximum absorption wavelength was 278 nm and it was sensitive to hydrogen peroxide, trichloromethane-ethanol and urea. These results indicate that the enzyme is an iron SOD. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Rice bacterial blight, caused by Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae (Xoo), is one of the most serious rice diseases worldwide. The bacterial blight resistance trait from Oryza meyeriana, a wild rice species, was introduced into an elite japonica rice cultivar using asymmetric somatic hybridization. This study was carried out with the intention of understanding the molecular mechanism of incompatible interaction between Xoo and the stable somatic hybrids by using proteomic analyses. Proteins were extracted from leaves at 24, 48, and 72 h after Xoo inoculation and separated by 2-DE. A total of 77 protein spots changed their intensities significantly (p < 0.05) by more than 1.5-fold at least at one time point. Sixty-four protein spots were successfully identified by MS analysis. Among them, 51 were known to be involved in photosynthesis. Up-regulation of Rubisco large subunit (RcbL) small fragments and down-regulation of RcbL big fragments indicated that intact RcbL and RcbL big fragments degraded following Xoo attack, which was further confirmed by Western blot analysis. The differential expression of proteins related to signal transduction, antioxidant defense, photosynthesis, metabolism, and protein turnover during the Xoo infection, suggests the existence of a complex regulatory network in the somatic hybrid rice that increases resistance toward Xoo infection and damage.

The incidence and mortality rates of cervical cancer are declining in the United States; however, worldwide, cervical cancer is still one of the leading causes of death in women, second only to breast cancer. This disparity is at least partially explained by the absence of or comparatively ineffective screening programs in the developing world. Recent advances in expression genomics have enabled the use of DNA microarray to profile gene expression of various cancers. These expression profiles may be suitable for molecular classification and prediction of disease outcome and treatment response. We envision that expression genomics applied in cervical cancer may provide a more rational approach to the classification and treatment of the disease.In this report, we examined the expression profiles of cervical cancer compared with normal cervical tissues in DNA microarrays that contained approximately 11,000 features that correspond to either human transcripts with known function or anonymous expressed sequence tags.Our results showed that normal cervical tissues were completely segregated from the cancer samples using about 40 genes whose expressions were significantly different between these specimens. In addition, clinical stage IB and stage IIB tumors could also be classified based on their signature expression patterns. Most importantly, some of the tumor samples were further stratified into two major groups based on their response to radiotherapy, and we were able to predict the response of these patients to radiotherapy from their expression profiles.Gene expression profiling by DNA microarray may be used for further molecular classification of disease stages and prediction of treatment response in cervical cancer.

We have noted that values for serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) are frequently low in patients with connective tissue diseases. Geometric mean values were 96.0 units/L among 121 disease-free males and 50.2 units/L among 63 disease-free females. The geometric mean values were 31.7 units/L in 11 males and 35.2 units/L in 49 females with systemic lupus erythematosus; 15.1 units/L in three males and 13.0 units/L in ten females with rheumatoid arthritis; and 41.6 units/L in 19 females with Sjogren's syndrome. Values within the normal range may occur in the face of active myositis in these illnesses. Findings of a low serum CPK value may occur in the absence of steroid treatment. Thus, a low serum CPK value is frequently found in patients with connective tissue disease and a normal value should not dissuade one from the diagnosis of myositis. 246 17 1921 1923

The quality of lubrication condition between seal faces directly affects the reliability, operating life and sealing performance of mechanical seals. Thus, the identification of lubrication regimes in face seals i.e. boundary lubrication (BL), mixed lubrication (ML) and hydrodynamic lubrication (HL) is of high importance for developing effective online condition monitoring approaches. This paper investigates the tribological behaviour and frictional characteristics of mechanical seals based on nonintrusive acoustic emission (AE) measurements. Mathematical models for AE generation mechanisms are derived based on the tribological behaviour and operating parameters of mechanical seals. They produce agreeable results with experimental data in explaining the types of AE signals observed in monitoring the face lubrication conditions. Frequency domain analysis of data shows that the viscous friction process generates more low frequency AE signals, whereas the asperity interactions show more high frequency AE. Moreover, the feasibility of using statistical parameters of the time domain data is shown to identify the lubrication regimes in face seals.

In this paper, an experimental investigation was carried out to evaluate the friction and wear between the cylinder liner and piston ring using acoustic emission (AE) technology. Based on a typical compression ignition (CI) diesel engine, four types of alternative fuels (Fischer-Tropsch fuel, methanol-diesel, emulsified diesel and standard diesel) were tested under dif-ferent operating conditions. AE signals collected from the cylinder block of the testing en-gine. In the meantime, the AE signals in one engine cycle are further segregated into small segments to eliminate the effects of valve events on friction events of cylinder liner. In this way, the resulted AE signals are consistent with the prediction of hydrodynamic lubrication processes. Test results show that there are clear evidences of high AE deviations between dif-ferent fuels. In particular, the methanol-diesel blended fuel produces higher AE energy, which indicates there are more wear between the piston ring and cylinder liner than using standard diesel. On the other hand, the other two alternative fuels have been found little dif-ferences in AE signal from the normal diesel. This paper has shown that AE analysis is an ef-fective technique for on-line assessment of engine friction and wear, which provides a novel approach to support the development of new engine fuels and new lubricants.

Sample expansion is an effective approach to resolve the incomplete sample problem in ship acoustics fault source identification. A novel sample expansion method based on noise disturbance is proposed. Firstly, the expanded samples are generated by adding different signal-tonoise ratio noise to the real acoustics fault samples. Then, the training collection is enhanced by combining the original training samples with the expanded samples. Experimental results on both simulated data and measured data demonstrate that the classifier performance can be improved by the expanded training sample set.

Holophris taiwana (Tsuneki, 1970) (Figs 1–2) Omalus taiwanus Tsuneki, 1970: 2. Holotype &male;: Taiwan: Nantou (KUM). Holophris taiwanus (Tsuneki): Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 225; Rosa et al. 2014: 26. Holophris taiwana (Tsuneki): Rosa et al. 2016: 207. Material examined. VIETNAM: 1&male;, Son La, Malaise trap, 5.ix.2017, leg. Khuat Dang Long. Distribution. China (Taiwan, Guangdong, Hainan), India, Indonesia, Laos, Thailand (Rosa et al. 2016), Vietnam (new record)., Published as part of Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong & Wiśniowski, Bogdan, 2021, Review of Holophris Mocsáry (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Vietnam, with description of a new species, pp. 393-399 in Zootaxa 4963 (2) on pages 394-395, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/4700778, {"references":["Tsuneki, K. (1970) Ein Beitrag zur Goldwespen-fauna Formosas. Etizenia, 49, 1 - 21.","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [\" 1990 \"]) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp. Linsenmaier, W. (1959) Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Beru ¨ cksichtigung der europa ¨ ischen Spezies. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32 (1), 1 - 232.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2014) An annotated checklist of the chrysidid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from China. ZooKeys, 455, 1 - 128.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S., Notton, D. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016) Revision of the Oriental genus Holophris Mocsary, 1890 and description of the genus Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4083 (2), 201 - 220. http: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4083.2.2"]}

Omalus timidus (Nurse, 1902) (Figs 15 A–15F) Ellampus timidus Nurse, 1902: 305. Lectotype &male; designated by Kimsey 1986: 107; Pakistan: Peshin (NHMUK). Bingham 1908: 347 (Assam). Omalus (Philoctetes) timidus: Jonathan et al. 1977: 85 (India: Delhi). Omalus timidus: Rosa et al. 2015c: 68 (key), 73 (descr.), 74 (diagn., fig. 4). Distribution. India (Assam; Delhi). Palaearctic: Pakistan (Rosa et al. 2015c). Oriental: China (Guandong) (Rosa et al. 2014). Remarks. Kimsey & Bohart (1991) transferred Ellampus timidus in the genus Holophris Mocsáry, 1890. Rosa et al. (2015c) transferred this species in the genus Omalus Panzer, 1801. du Buysson (in Nurse 1904) synonymised Omalus timidus with Pseudomalus hypocrita (du Buysson, 1893). However, based on type specimens, these two species belong to separate genera., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan, 2021, An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4929 (1) on pages 21-22, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4544556, {"references":["Nurse, G. C. (1902) New species of Indian Chrysididae. The Entomologist, 35, 304 - 308.","Kimsey, L. S. (1986) Designation of chrysidid lectotypes. The Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 62, 105 - 110.","Bingham, C. T. (1908) Notes on Aculeate Hymenoptera in the Indian Museum. Part I. Records of the Indian Museum, 2 (4 / 32), 347 - 349.","Jonathan, J. K., Roy, S. B. & Dhar, M. (1977) On a collection of cuckoo wasps from India and Bhutan (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Newsletter Zoological Survey of India, 32, 85 - 87.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2015 c) Contribution to the genus Omalus Panzer, 1801 of China, with descriptions of two new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4013 (1), 67 - 76. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4013.1.4","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2014) An annotated checklist of the chrysidid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from China. ZooKeys, 455, 1 - 128. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 455.6557","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [' ' 1990 '']) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp.","Mocsary, A. (1890) Additamentum primum ad monographiam Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Termeszetrajzi Fuzetek, 13 (2 - 3), 45 - 66.","Panzer, G. W. F. (1801) Faunae Insectorum Germaniae initia, oder, Deutschlands Insecten. Heft 80 - 85. Felseckerschen Buchhandlung, Nurnberg. [unknown pagination 1801] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15007","Nurse, G. C. (1904) New species of Indian Hymenoptera. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 16, 19 - 26.","du Buysson, R. (1893) Contribution aux Chrysides du Globe (2 e serie). Revue d'Entomologie, 12, 245 - 252."]}

Trichrysis scioensis (Gribodo, 1879) Chrysis scioensis Gribodo, 1879: 344. Holotype &female;; East Africa (MSNG). Bingham 1903: 436 (key), 454–455 (descr., Delhi). Chrysis (Trichrysis) scioensis: Bischoff 1913: 46 (cat., India). Remarks. Trichrysis scioensis is an Afrotropical species. We consider Bingham’s (1903) record questionable, and likely related to another species later described in this genus. Key to subfamilies, tribes and genera of Indian Chrysidids We provide an identification key to subfamilies, tribes and genera of Indian Chrysidids. We expand the key by nine Cleptinae and Chrysidinae genera not yet recorded from India, but anyway expected in the region. Keys to Ceylonese Amiseginae are provided by Krombein (1980, 1983), and to Loboscelidia by Kimsey (2012). It is still too early to provide a dichotomous key for the Indian species of cuckoo wasps, because the fauna is still poorly recognized, and we expect that the number of known species will increase in a relatively short time. The key to species is therefore postponed to future publications. 1 Metasoma with four (female) or five (male) external tergites, ventral surface convex. Metapectal-propodeal complex generally with elongate dorsal surface, usually carinate or rugulose (polished in Loboscelidiinae).............................. 2 - Metasoma with three external tergites (four in Parnopes male), ventral surface flat or concave. Metapectal-propodeal complex short, abruptly declivitous posteriorly, without distinct dorsal surface................................ (Chrysidinae) 5 2 Face above antennal sockets convex, without scapal basin; clypeus with protruding medial truncation; pronotum campanulate, narrowed submedially and bisected by transverse groove; female ovipositor robust....................... (Cleptinae) 3 - Face above antennal sockets flat or concave with some scapal basin, or antennae insertion on frontal projection; clypeus without protruding medial truncation; pronotum not campanulate, without transverse groove, at most narrowed apically; female ovipositor needle like.................................................................................. 4 3 Tarsal claws with one minute, perpendicular submedial or subbasal tooth, sometimes indistinct to fading; forewings hyaline, rarely slightly banded; metasomal terga usually anteriorly non-metallic orange and posteriorly black, often with blue-green metallic reflections, or entirely black, or rarely entirely metallic (not yet recorded in India)......... Cleptes Latreille, 1802 - Tarsal claws bifid, with broadened, subapical tooth, as broad as the upper tooth; forewings banded, metasomal terga fully black, with blue to violet metallic reflections and with transverse golden or greenish golden bands (Fig. 2)...................................................................................................... Lustrina Kurian, 1955 4 Head with large cervical projection; tegula large and broad, covering base of forewing and hindwing and held in place by ridge on mesopleuron; forewing venation reduced without costal vein or stigma (Figs 4, 5)............................................................................................ (Loboscelidiinae) Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 - Head without cervical projection; tegula small, covering only base of forewing and without associated ridge on mesopleuron; forewing with costal vein and stigma, or strongly brachypterous; only one genus known from India so far (Fig. 3), several genera known from Sri Lanka (see conclusions)............................... (Amiseginae) Indothrix Krombein, 1957 5 Metasoma with three (&female;) or four (&male;) external tergites (Figs 86, 87); mouthparts (galea and glossa) strongly developed, longer than the rest of the head; tegula large and broad, covering base of forewing and hindwing.................. (Parnopini) 6 - Metasoma with three external tergites in both sexes; mouthparts short; tegula small, covering only base of forewing....... 7 6 Metanotal projection large, apical margin trilobate; profemur without ventral tooth; posterior propodeal angle not deeply emarginate posteriorly (Figs 86, 87)....................................................... Parnopes Latreille, 1796 - Metanotal projection small, non-metallic yellowish, with apical margin bilobate, truncate or rounded; profemur with ventral tooth; posterior propodeal angle usually deeply emarginate posteriorly.................. Cephaloparnops Bischoff, 1910 7 Tarsal claws with one or more subapical teeth; forewing radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) short and basally curved; head without preoccipital carina; T3 without subapical pit row and apical teeth.............. (Elampini) 8 - Tarsal claws simple, without subapical teeth; forewing radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) elongate to wing margin or nearly so, basally straight; head with preoccipital carina, ending in hook; T3 with subapical pit row, with or without apical teeth.............................................................................. (Chrysidini) 16 8 Tarsal claws with one subsidiary tooth..................................................................... 9 - Tarsal claws with more than one subsidiary tooth........................................................... 10 9 Tarsal claws with one perpendicular and submedian tooth; T3 without angular projection (Fig. 8)........................................................................................... Hedychridium Abeille de Perrin, 1878 - Tarsal claws with one subparallel and subsidiary tooth; T3 usually with two small angular projections (Figs 9-11)........................................................................................ Hedychrum Latreille, 1802 10 Forewing medial cell with setae; vein M strongly curved; T3 without apical notch (Figs 13, 14)... Holopyga Dahlbom, 1845 - Forewing medial cell asetosae; vein M slightly curved; T3 with or without apical notch............................. 11 11 Metanotum produced to form horizontal tongue-like projection (Fig. 7B, 7C), rarely with a short projection (Fig. 6B); T3 with apical notch, usually with horseshoe-shaped or falcate rim (Fig. 7G, 7H), rarely without rim (Fig. 6C); female gena with row of setae............................................................................. Elampus Spinola, 1806 - Metanotum rounded; T3 with or without apical notch, without horseshoe-shaped or falcate rim; female gena without row of setae.............................................................................................. 12 12 Mesoscutum impunctate, at most with wrinkles............................................................ 13 - Mesoscutum with large punctures....................................................................... 14 13 Head, in frontal view, with convex upper profile; temples narrow ( 1.0 × MOD) (Fig. 12)................................................... Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 - Head, in frontal view, lenticular; temples broad (> 1.0 × MOD); mesopleuron subrectangular with simple omaulus, sometimes with large punctures resembling double omaulus; transpleural carina extending to apex of propodeal angle; T3 usually with notch, usually without rim, sometimes with narrow semi-transparent rim ( Omalus Panzer, 1801 14 MS not bisected by genal carina; metanotum usually elevated or gibbous to mucronate (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part)....................................................... Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin, 1879 - MS bisected by genal carina; metanotum evenly rounded..................................................... 15 15 Mesoscutum with large punctures mostly concentrated posteromedially between notauli; mesopleuron with ventral margin Vshaped, strongly projecting; head and mesosoma with polished intervals between punctures; T3 apical notch without spine or tooth at its sides (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part)............... Pseudomalus Ashmead, 1902 - Mesoscutum with large punctures evenly distributed or concentrated along notauli (in Palaearctic species); mesopleuron with ventral margin extending at oblique angle; head and mesosoma with colliculate sculpture on intervals between punctures (see Rosa et al. 2015b); T3 apical notch usually with two spines or teeth at its sides, rarely blunted (not yet recorded in India).................................................................. Chrysellampus Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932 16 Radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) of forewing ending largely beforewing margin, at least 3.0 × MOD far or at distance approximately equal to length of pterostigma................................................... 17 - Radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) of forewing extending to wing margin, or nearly so............ 21 17 Radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) very short, Rs vein about two-thirds as long as stigma, and ending abruptly far away from the wing margin; mesopleuron simple, without scrobal sulcus.................................................................................... Primeuchroeus Linsenmaier, 1959 (part., siamensis group) - Radial sector vein (Second radial cross & Radial sector) complete and elongate, although ending 3 × MOD beForewing margin; mesopleuron with distinct scrobal sulcus bisecting mesopleuron horizontally, with exception of other Primeuchroeus groups................................................................................................... 18 18 Head in frontal view narrow and elongated; mesopleuron inferiorly tridentate; metanotum posteriorly mucronate with one large projection, hollowed like calyx; T3 with very pronounced transverse swelling before pit row; T3 apical margin with four well developed teeth (Fig. 78).............................................................. Stilbum Spinola, 1806 - Head in frontal view at most only slightly longer than wide; mesopleuron inferiorly U-shaped or V-shaped, at most bidentate under scrobal sulcus; metanotum simple, rounded; T3 without distinctly elevated transverse swelling before preapical pit row; T3 apical margin without teeth, or with series of irregular teeth................................................ 19 19 Mesopleuron inferiorly bidentate; T3 apical margin with a series of irregular teeth; female with unmistakable pink colouring in living specimens, often more or less green-coloured in preserved specimens, and with a violet pattern on T2 and T 3 in some species; male blue or green, with blue patterns on T2 and T3; both sexes often with legs at least partly non-metallic yellow, (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part).................................. Euchroeus Latreille, 1809 - Mesopleuron inferiorly U-shaped or V-shaped without distinct teeth; anal margin of T3 smooth or finely crenulated with angle at lateral end; different coloration, with unicoloured metasoma, at most with T3 entirely blue-green, contrasting with red T1 and T2................................................................................................ 20 20 Scapal basin micropunctate, without transverse wrinkles; lower mesopleuron U-shaped or V-shaped; T3 apical margin laterally with angular protrusion (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part)............. Spinolia Dahlbom, 1854 - Scapal basin transversely striate; mesopleuron simple, inferiorly unmodified; T3 apical margin continuous, without teeth (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part)............................... Pseudochrysis Semenow, 1891 21 Mesopleuron without horizontal scrobal sulcus.................................. Primeuchroeus Linsenmaier, 1959 - Mesopleuron with distinct horizontal scrobal sulcus......................................................... 22 22 Discoidal cell incomplete, its outer veins either not or only partly sclerotized; T3 apical margin usually with two lateral teeth and medially undulate, rarely with median tooth; scapal basin hollowed, striate, topped by convex TFC, S2 black spots oval or round, usually separated by 1–2 × MOD; green to blue species............................. Chrysidea Bischoff, 1913 - Discoidal cell complete; T3 apical margin differently shaped, if with two lateral teeth and medially undulate, then body colour not entirely green to blue or TFC not topping the scapal basin; scapal basin various and TFC not topping the scapal basin; S2 black spots variously shaped; body colour various.......................................................... 23 23 T3 apical margin with three or five teeth.................................................................. 24 - T3 apical margin without teeth, with undulations, or with even number of teeth; if T3 apical margin with three teeth, then without pronotal lateral carina (Chrysis ear group, not yet recorded in India); if with five teeth, then without pronotal lateral carina and with unmodified flagellomeres (Chrysis excellens group, Fig. 37)........................................... 28 24 T3 apical margin with three teeth, lateral teeth may be simple angular projections (Figs 79E, 83E), or with three median teeth and two lateral angles (Fig. 72D)........................................................................ 25 - T3 apical margin with five teeth......................................................................... 26 25 TFC with branches encircling mid-ocellar area; anterior ocellus lidded; pronotum without lateral carina; mesopleuron with ventral margin tridentate; T3 lateral edge biconvex; black spots on S2 rounded to sub-oval, almost connected to lateral margin of second metasomal sternite and medially well separated (Fig. 72)..................... Odontochrydium Brauns, 1928 - TFC simple, not encircling mid-ocellar area; anterior ocellus not lidded; pronotum with lateral carina; mesopleuron unmodified, without teeth; T3 lateral edge not biconvex; black spots on S2 small, medially fused and well separated from lateral margins (Figs 79, 81, 83, 84, 85)..................................................... Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 26 Pronotum with lateral carina fully developed (Figs 79, 83).............................. Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 - Pronotum without lateral carina......................................................................... 27 27 F1 ±5 × as long as broad; flagellum not broadened, slender; in frontal view, malar spaces parallel-sided or slightly diverging; metanotum convex; species usually bicoloured, with blue to green head and mesosoma and red or golden red metasoma, rarely with blue median line, or male blue with a large lateral red spot on T2—Parasitoid of Vespidae (Eumeninae) (not yet recorded in India).................................................................. Pentachrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 - F1 less than 3 × as long as broad; flagellum usually broadened; in frontal view, malar spaces converging below; metanotum convex, with posterior spine or mucron; species coloured blue to green, at most with darker blue area on ocellar triangle, on median area of mesoscutum and at base of T2 and T3 (Figs 73–77)—Parasitoid of limacodid moths (Lepidoptera)................................................................................. Praestochrysis Linsenmaier, 1959 28 Face flat, without scapal basin and transverse frontal carina; male usually with F2 to F5 ventrally bulging; apical margin of T3 without apical teeth or angular prominences (Fig. 70)..................................... Chrysura Dahlbom, 1845 - Face with scapal basin and more or less sharp transverse frontal carina; male usually with cylindrical flagellomeres, rarely F2 to F5 ventrally hardly bulging; apical margin of T3 waved, with apical teeth or angular prominences, or rarely rounded without teeth (in Spintharina and Chrysis capitalis, ceciliae, elegans, and succincta species groups)......................... 29 29 Flagellomeres F4 to F10 ventrally bulging; TFC markedly sharp; deep scapal basin; propodeal angles, in postero-dorsal view, slightly lobed and restricted basally (character sometimes not clearly evident); T3 apical margin simple and continuous with very thin hyaline rim, in some species with a lobe on lateral edge at base of T3; golden red specimens in nature, usually greenish-copper in collections (not yet recorded in India, expected for the Palaearctic part)......... Spintharina Semenow, 1892 - Flagellomeres cylindrical, if ventrally bulging, then TFC faint and scapal basin almost flat, evenly micropunctate; TFC various, propodeal angles various, not basally lobed or restricted; T3 apical margin various, without hyaline rim; body colour various................................................................................................... 30 30 Apex of T3 without teeth; male genitalia with longitudinal crest on aedeagus; one species, blue coloured, with scapal basin hollowed, striate, topped by convex TFC; metanotum with raised subtriangular median area, shallowly concave medially; black spots on S2 large, subrectangular and connected to lateral margins (Fig. 71)... Istiochrysis Rosa & Xu in Rosa et al. , 2016c - Apex of T3 various; male genitalia unmodified, aedeagus without subsidiary structure; in case of edentate T3, then TFC vanishing; metanotum convex or mucronate; black spots on S2 differently shaped.................... Chrysis Linnaeus, 1761, Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan, 2021, An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4929 (1) on pages 88-90, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4544556, {"references":["Gribodo, G. (1879) Note imenotterologiche. Annali del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Genova, 14, 325 - 347.","Bingham, C. T. (1903) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor & Francis, London, 528 pp.","Bischoff, H. (1913) Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman, P. (Ed.), Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. L. Desmet- Verteneuil, Bruxelles, pp. 1 - 86, 5 pls.","Krombein, K. V. (1980) Biosystematic studies of Ceylonese wasps, I: A preliminary revision of the Amiseginae (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). P. E. P. Deraniyagala Commemoration Volume. Lake House Investments, Colombo, 392 pp.","Krombein, K. V. (1983) Biosystematic studies, XI: A monograph of the Amiseginae and Loboscelidiinae. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology, 376, 1 - 79.","Kimsey, L. S. (2012) Review of the odd chrysidid genus Loboscelidia Westwood, 1874 (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Loboscelidiinae). ZooKeys, 213, 1 - 40. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 213.2985","Latreille, P. A. (1802) Histoire naturelle generale et particuliere des Crustaces et des Insectes. Ouvrage faisant suite a l'Histoire Naturelle generale et particuliere, composee par Leclercq de Buffon, et redigee par C. S. Sonnini, membre de plusieurs Societes savantes. Familles naturelles des genres. Tome troisieme. F. Dufart, Paris, xii + 455 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15764","Kurian, C. (1955) Bethyloidea (Hymenoptera) from India. Agra University Journal of Research, 4, 86 - 88.","Westwood, J. O. (1874) Thesaurus Entomologicus Oxoniensis. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 205 pp.","Krombein, K. V. (1957) A generic review of the Amiseginae, a group of phasmatid egg parasites, and notes on the Adelphinae (Hymenoptera, Bethyloidea, Chrysididae). Transactions of the American Entomological Society, 82, 147 - 215.","Latreille, P. A. (1796) Precis des characteres generiques des Insectes, disposes dans un ordre naturel. Par le Citoyen Latreille. F. Bordeaux, Brive, Prevot and Paris, xiv + 201 + [7] pp., 1 pl.","Bischoff, H. (1910) Die Chrysididen des K ˆ niglichen Zoologischen Museums zu Berlin. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 4 (3), 427 - 493, pl. 7.","Abeille de Perrin, E. (1878) Diagnoses de Chrysides nouvelles. Published by the author, Marseille, 6 pp.","Dahlbom, A. G. (1845) Dispositio Methodica Specierum Hymenopterorum, secundum Familias Insectorum naturales. Particula secunda. Dissert, Berlingianis, Lund, 20 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 66977","Spinola, M. (1806) Insectorum Liguriae species novae aut rariores, quas in agro Ligustico nuper detexit, descripsit et iconibus illustravit, Maximilianus Spinola, adjecto catalogo specierum auctoribus jam enumeratarum, quae in eadem regione passim occurrunt. Vol. 1. Yves Gravier, Genuae, xvii + 160 pp., 2 pls. [1806] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 65985","Mocsary, A. (1890) Additamentum primum ad monographiam Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Termeszetrajzi Fuzetek, 13 (2 - 3), 45 - 66.","Panzer, G. W. F. (1801) Faunae Insectorum Germaniae initia, oder, Deutschlands Insecten. Heft 80 - 85. Felseckerschen Buchhandlung, Nurnberg. [unknown pagination 1801] https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15007","Abeille de Perrin, E. (1879) Synopsis critique et synonymique des Chrysides de France. Annales de la Societe Linneenne de Lyon, 26, 1 - 108.","Ashmead, W. H. (1902) Classification of the fossorial, predaceous and parasitic wasps, or the superfamily Vespoidea. The Canadian Entomologist, 34 (9), 219 - 231. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 34219 - 9","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2015 b) Revalidation of genus Chrysellampus Semenov, 1932, with description of two new species from China (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4034 (1), 148 - 160. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4034.1.7","Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, A. (1932) Supplementa ad Chrysididarum monographias ab A. G. Dahlbom (1854), A. Mocsary (1889), R. du Buysson (1896) et H. Bishoff (1913) editas. I. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 42, 1 - 48.","Linsenmaier, W. (1959) Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Brucksichtigung der europaischen Spezies. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32, 1 - 232.","Latreille, P. A. (1809) Genera Crustaceorum et Insectorum secundum ordinem naturalem in familias disposita, iconibus exemplisque plurimis explicata. Tomus quartus et ultimus. Amand Koenig, Parisiis et Argentorati [Paris and Strasbourg], 399 pp.","Dahlbom, A. G. (1854) Hymenoptera Europaea praecipue borealia, formis typicis nonnullis specierum generumve exoticorum propter nexum systematicum associatis, per familias, genera, species et varietates disposita atque descripta. Tomus secundus. Chrysis in sensu Linnaeano. Friedrich Nicolai, Berolini [Berlin], xxiv + 412 pp., 12 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15890","Semenow, A. (1891) Pseudochrysis (Spintharis) virgo, sp. n. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 25, 441 - 444.","Brauns, H. (1928) Beitrag zur Kenntnis afrikanischer Chrysididen. Entomologische Mitteilungen, 17 (6), 383 - 393.","Lichtenstein, J. (1876) Note sur les genre Chrysis. Petites Nouvelles Entomologiques, 2 (8 / 145), 27.","Semenow, A. (1892) De genere Pseudochrysis m. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 26, 480 - 491.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016 c) Istiochrysis gen. nov., a new chrysidid genus from Oriental China (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Chrysidini). Zootaxa, 4111 (5), 591 - 597. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4111.5.5","Linnaeus, C. (1761) Fauna Svecica sistens Animalia Sveciae Regni: Mammalia, Aves, Amphibia, Pisces, Insecta, Vermes. Distributa per Classes et Ordines, Genera et Species, cum Differentiis, Specierum, Synonymis, Auctorum, Nominibus Incolarum, Locis natalium, Descriptionibus Insectorum. Editio Altera, Auctior. Laurentius Salvius, Stockholmiae, 578 pp., 2 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 46380"]}

Key to Oriental genera of the tribe Elampini We provide an updated key to the Oriental genera of the tribe Elampini after the genus Chrysellampus Semenov, 1932 was reinstated (Rosa et al. 2015c), Holophris Mocsáry here redescribed and Leptopareia gen. nov. here established. The genus Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin is not yet recorded in the Oriental region, but included in the key because some species could be distributed at least in the Oriental part of China. 1. Tarsal claw with one subsidiary tooth..................................................................... 2 - Tarsal claw with more than one subsidiary tooth............................................................. 3 2. Tarsal claw with one perpendicular and submedial tooth; T3 without angular projection..... Hedychridium Abeille de Perrin - Tarsal claw with one subparallel and subsidiary tooth; T3 usually with two small angular projections... Hedychrum Latreille 3. Fore wing medial cell with setae; vein M strongly curved; T3 without apical notch................... Holopyga Dahlbom - Fore wing medial cell asetosae; vein M slightly curved; T3 with or without apical notch............................. 4 4. Metanotum produced to form horizontal tongue-like projection, rarely without projection; T3 with apical notch, usually with horseshoe-shaped or falcate rim, rarely without rim; female gena with row of setae.................... Elampus Spinola - Metanotum rounded (rarely with tongue-like projection, not observed in Oriental species); T3 with or without apical notch, usually without horseshoe-shaped or falcate rim; female gena without row of setae................................. 5 5. Mesoscutum impunctate, at most with wrinkles............................................................. 6 – Mesoscutum with large punctures........................................................................ 8 6. Head with indistinct subgenal area (postgena) (Fig. 3A); gena very narrow under lower margin of eye (Figs 3A, 9A, 11A); MS not bisected by genal carina; genal area not carinate (Fig. 3A); fore wing with pterostigma positioned over half length of anterior margin (Fig. 2A)........................................................ Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. - Head with distinct subgenal area (Figs 3B, 4A, 5A, 6A); gena broad under lower margin of eye (Fig. 3B); MS bisected by genal carina; genal area and subgenal area carinate; fore wing with pterostigma positioned at less than half length of anterior margin (Fig. 2B), rarely at half length.................................................................... 7 7. Head, in frontal view, with convex upper profile (Figs 4B, 5B, 6B); temples narrow ( 1 MOD)........................ Holophris Mocsáry - Head, in frontal view, lenticular (Wei et al. 2014: Figs 2A, 6A); temples broad (> 1 MOD); mesopleuron subrectangular with simple omaulus, sometimes with large punctures resembling double omaulus (Fig. 1A); transpleural carina extending to apex of propodeal angle (Fig. 1A); T3 usually with notch, usually without rim (Wei et al. 2014: Figs 2F, 6F), sometimes with narrow semi-transparent rim (Omalus Panzer 8. MS not bisected by genal carina; metanotum usually elevated or gibbous to mucronate (Rosa et al. 2015d: Fig. 2C)...................................................................................... Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin - MS bisected by genal carina; metanotum evenly rounded..................................................... 9 9. Mesoscutum with large punctures mostly concentrated posteromedially between notauli; mesopleuron with ventral margin strongly projecting; head and mesosoma with polished intervals between punctures; T3 apical notch without spine or tooth at its sides........................................................................... Pseudomalus Ashmead - Mesoscutum with large punctures evenly distributed (Rosa et al. 2015c: Fig. 4C) (concentrated along notauli in two Palaearctic species); mesopleuron with ventral margin extending at an oblique angle (Rosa et al. 2015c: Fig. 3); head and mesosoma with colliculate sculpture on intervals between punctures (Rosa et al. 2015c: Figs 4C, 4D); T3 apical notch usually with two spines or teeth at its sides (Rosa et al. 2015c: Fig. 4F), rarely blunted............................... Chrysellampus Semenov, Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Wei, Na-Sen, Notton, David & Xu, Zai-Fu, 2016, Revision of the Oriental genus Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 and description of the genus Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) in Zootaxa 4083 (2) on page 203, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4083.2.2, http://zenodo.org/record/1053815, {"references":["Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, A. (1932) Supplementa ad Chrysididarum monographias ab A. G. Dahlbom (1854), A. Mocsary (1889), R. du Buysson (1896) et H. Bischoff (1913) editas. I. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 42 (3), 1 - 48.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2015 c) Revalidation of genus Chrysellampus Semenov, 1932, with description of two new species from China (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4034 (1), 148 - 160. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4034.1.7","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2014) An annotated checklist of the chrysidid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from China. ZooKeys, 455, 1 - 128. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 455.6557","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2015 d) The genus Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin, 1879 from China, with description of two new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4040 (4), 433 - 444. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4040.4.3"]}

Subgenus Chrysellampus Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, 1932 Omalus (Chrysellampus) truncatus (Dahlbom, 1831) = O. anomalus (Förster, 1853) = O. minutus (Dahlbom, 1854) Omalus sculpticollis (Abeille de Perrin, 1878) Omalus medanae (du Buysson in Magretti, 1890) Omalus pici (du Buysson, 1900) Omalus nigromaculatus Linsenmaier, 1997 Omalus duplipunctatus (Tsuneki, 1948) Remarks. Currently, Chrysellampus is considered as a distinct genus (Rosa et al. 2015b). Omalus (Chrysellampus) truncatus belongs to Philoctetes and not to Chrysellampus (Rosa et al. 2015b). Omalus nigromaculatus has been synonymised with Omalus pici by Arens (2014)., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Heim, René & Bernasconi, Marco Valerio, 2023, The Palaearctic types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited in the Linsenmaier collection. Part 4. Elampini: genus Omalus Panzer, 1801, pp. 61-86 in Zootaxa 5297 (1) on page 79, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5297.1.3, http://zenodo.org/record/7989429, {"references":["Semenov-Tian-Shanskij, A. (1932) Supplementa ad Chrysididarum monographias ab A. G. Dahlbom (1854), A. Mocsary (1889), R. du Buysson (1896) et H. Bischoff (1913) editas. I. Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae, 42 (3), 1 - 48.","Dahlbom, A. G. (1831) Exercitationes Hymenopterologicae. Monographia Chrysididum Sveciae (Familia Hymenopterorum Octava Latreille). Pars II, III (partim). Londini Gothorum [Pars III, Chrysididae 33 - 36].","Forster, A. (1853) Eine Centurie neuer Hymenopteren. b. Beschreibungen neuer Arten aus der Familie der Chrysididen. Verhandlungen des Naturhistorischen Vereins der Preussischen Rheinlande und Westphalens, 10, 304 - 362.","Dahlbom, A. G. (1854) Hymenoptera Europaea praecipue borealia, formis typicis nonnullis specierum generumve Exoticorum aut Extraneorum propter nexum systematicum associatis, per familias, genera, species et varietates disposita atque descripta. 2. Chrysis in sensu Linnaeano. Friedrich Nicolai, Berlin, 436 pp. + 12 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15890","Abeille de Perrin, E. (1878) Diagnoses de Chrysides nouvelles. Published by the author, Marseille, 6 pp.","Magretti, P. (1890) Imenotteri di Siria raccolti dall'Avv. to Augusto Medana, R. Console d'Italia a Tripoli di Siria, con descrizione di alcune specie nuove. Annali del Museo civico di Storia naturale di Genova, 29, 522 - 530.","du Buysson, R. (1900) Contribution aux Chrysidides du Globe (4 e Serie). Revue d'Entomologie, 19, 125 - 160 + 2 pls.","Linsenmaier, W. (1997) Altes und Neues von den Chrysididen. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Entomofauna, 18 (19), 245 - 300.","Tsuneki, K. (1948) Chrysididae from Shansi, North China (Hymenoptera). Mushi 18 (19), 115 - 128 + 3 pls.","Rosa, P., Wei, N-s., Notton, D. & Xu, Z-f. (2015 b) The genus Philoctetes Abeille de Perrin, 1879 from China, with description of two new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4040 (4), 433 - 444. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4040.4.3","Arens, W. (2014) Die Goldwespen der Peloponnes (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) 1. Teil: Die Gattungen Cleptes, Omalus, Holopyga, Hedychrum, Hedychridium und Euchroeus; mit Beschreibung einer neuen Cleptes - Art. Linzer Biologische Beitrage, 46 (1), 553 - 621."]}

Aspidistra phongdiensis D.Dien, T.A.Le & Vislobokov, sp. nov. (Fig. 1) Diagnosis: Aspidistra phongdiensis is morphologically similar to A. khangii but differs in wider leaf blade (vs. narrowly elliptic), perigone white outside (vs. purple mottled), yellow pollen (vs. white), introrse anthers (vs. latrorse) and widely obconic pistil (vs. deskshaped). Type: — VIETNAM. Thua Thien Hue province: Phong Dien district, Phong Xuan commune, Phong Dien Nature Reserve, 16°24′14.73″N, 107°13′27.59″E, 350 m a.s.l., 18 April 2021, Dien Dinh, Quoc Tuan Doan, Vu Tien Chinh, Le Ngoc Tuan, Le Van Huong, Tran Nam Thang, Tuan Anh Le LTA 2337 (holotype VNMN!; isotype SGN!). Plant perennial, evergreen, herbaceous, rhizomatous, glabrous. Rhizome creeping, epigeous, 0.6–1 cm in diameter, distal part (3–4 cm) ascending to vertical with prop roots. Roots grey, 2.5–4 mm in diameter. Rhizomes with regularly repeating units, each comprising a few distichously arranged phyllomes (cataphylls followed by a foliage leaf). Cataphylls oblong, 9–15 cm long, 1–1.3 cm wide, rapidly withering. Foliage leaves green, divided into petiole and lamina. Petiole green, adaxially sulcate, 20.6–27 cm long, 5–8 mm in diameter. Lamina green, elliptic, basally cuneate, apically narrowly acuminate, 28–30 cm long, 8.5–10.5 cm wide, parallel-veined with median vein prominent on abaxial surface, margin entire. Peduncle (specialized reproductive shoot) arising horizontally and arching down, purple mottled, 2.8–13 cm long, 3–4 mm in diameter, with 5–6 dark green and purple mottled, broadly ovate, 7–9 mm long, 5–11 mm wide distichously arranged sterile bracts. Flower solitary at the top of the peduncle. Perigone broadly obovate, globoid, container-shaped (urceolate with inflexed lobes), down faced, white outside, purple-red inside, fleshy, ca. 3 mm thick; tube widely campanulate, 2.7–3 cm long, 3.6–5 cm in diameter; lobes 6, widely ovate to triangular, incurved forming a star-like perigone opening, 2.4–2.9 mm in diameter. Stamens 6, inserted at base of perigone tube at the same radii with perigone lobes; anthers subsessile, yellow, ovoid, 2 mm long, 1.3–1.5 mm wide, introrse. Pistil uniformly white, widely obconic to club-shaped, 9–10 mm long; ovary superior, inconspicuous, 3-locular; style widely obconic, roundish hexagonal in cross section, with 12–13 longitudinal ridges, up to 10 mm long, 4 mm in diameter at base; stigma disk-shaped, fleshy, 14–15 mm in diameter, upper surface tuberose with 3 radial bifurcated grooves, hexagonal, side surface with 20 prominent longitudinal ridges. Fruits dull green to brow, subspherical, 1.6–2.5 mm in diameter, with conical protuberances 1–2.5 mm long. Paratype: — VIETNAM. Thua Thien Hue province: Phong Dien district, Phong Xuan commune, Phong Dien Nature Reserve, 16°24′14.73″N, 107°13′27.59″E, 350 m a.s.l., 11 March 2023, Dien Dinh, Quoc Tuan Doan, Vu Tien Chinh, Le Ngoc Tuan, Le Van Huong, Tran Nam Thang, Tuan Anh Le LTA s.n. (VNMN!, SGN!, MW!). Etymology: —The specific epithet is derived from its type locality, in Phong Dien Nature Reserve, located in Phong Dien district, Thua Thien Hue province, central Vietnam. Vernacular name: —Tỏi &dstrok;á phong &dstrok;iễn. Phenology: —Flowering from March to April, and fruiting from April to May in natural habitat. Distribution and ecology: — Aspidistra phongdiensis is only known from type locality where it is common (Fig. 2). The new species grows in primary and secondary evergreen broad-leaved lowland forest on alluvial soils at elevation around 850 m a.s.l., commonly on shady reclined slopes in assemblage with Piper sp., Calamus tetradactylus Hance (1875: 289), Blastus cochinchinensis Loureiro (1790: 527), etc. Conservation status: —Although the new species is located in a protected area, it grows near to the landslide area. Thus, following the IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (IUCN 2021), it is provisionally assessed as Data Deficient (DD). Taxonomic relationships: —The new species is morphologically closest to A. khangii by shape of perigone but differs in shape of leaf blade (elliptic 8.5–10.5 cm wide vs. narrowly elliptic 2–7 cm wide), colour of perigone (white outside vs. purple mottled outside), colour of pollen (yellow vs. white), type of anther dehiscence (introrse vs. latrorse) and shape of pistil (widely obconic vs. desk-shaped) (Averyanov & Tillich 2014, Averyanov et al. 2019b). In flower structure A. phongdiensis is also similar to A. locii but differs in colour of perigone (white outside, purple-red inside vs. uniformly grass green), presence of six perigone lobes (vs. absence of free lobes), number of stamens (6 vs. 12–21), type of anther dehiscence (introrse vs. latrorse) and shape of pistil (widely obconic vs. deskshaped) (Bogner & Arnautov 2004, Averyanov et al. 2019b). In flower coloration the new species is similar to A. austroyunnanensis Hu, Cai & Wang in Cai et al. (2018: 233), but differs in perigone lobes orientation (curved inward vs. curved outward), stamens morphology (subsessile anthers vs. with filaments 2–3 mm long) and shape of pistil (widely obconic with longitudinal ridges vs. mushroom-shaped smooth) (Cai et al. 2018)., Published as part of Chinh, Vu Tien, Dinh, Dien, Le, Tuan Anh, Doan, Quoc Tuan, Le, Ngoc Tuan, Le, Van Huong, Tran, Nam Thang & Vislobokov, Nikolay A., 2023, Aspidistra phongdiensis (Asparagaceae), a new species from Central Vietnam, pp. 64-70 in Phytotaxa 591 (1) on pages 65-67, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.591.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/7784280, {"references":["Hance, H. F. (1875) A fourth new Hong Kong Calamus. Journal of Botany, British and Foreign. 13: 289 - 290.","Loureiro, J. (1790) Flora Cochinchinensis 2. Ulyssipone, pp. 357 - 744.","Averyanov, L. V. & Tillich, H. J. (2014) Aspidistra albopurpurea, A. khangii, A. lubae and A. stellata spp. nov. (Asparagaceae, Convallariaceae ss) from Indochina. Nordic Journal of Botany 32: 752 - 760. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1756 - 1051.2013.00273. x","Averyanov, L. V., Nguyen, K. S., Son, H. T., Tillich, H. J. & Maisak, T. V. (2019 b) New taxa and taxonomic notes in Aspidistra (Convallariaceae s. s.) of Laos and Vietnam. Nordic Journal of Botany 37: e 02352. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / njb. 01833","Bogner, J. & Arnautov, N. (2004) Aspidistra locii (Convallariaceae), an unusual new species from Vietnam. Willdenowia 34: 203 - 208. [https: // www. jstor. org / stable / 3997475]","Cai, L., Peng, S., Tian, J., Dao, Z. L., Wei, N., Hu, G. W. & Wang, Q. F. (2018) Aspidistra austroyunnanensis (Asparagaceae), a new species from southern Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 356: 233 - 237. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / phytotaxa. 356.3.5"]}

Nereis denhamensis Augener, 1913 Figs 8A–G, 19G–H Nereis denhamensis Augener, 1913: 156–159, fig. 16.a–b, pl. 3, fig. 51u; Fauvel 1917: 204–206, pl. 6, figs 45–46; Kott 1951: 99–101, figs 3.s–y, 4.l–q; Hartman 1954: 30–31; Hutchings & Turvey 1982: 124–125, fig. 11.a–k; Wilson 1985: 133–134; Glasby et al. 2013: 253–255, fig. 5A–B. Nereis (Nereis) denhamensis.— Hartmann-Schröder 1980: 58, figs 47–55; Hartmann-Schröder 1984: 27. Type locality. Shark Bay, Western Australia. Material examined. Western Australia: Cape Bosut, Bidyadanga, 18°42′04.99″S 121°37′34.11″E, 3 November 2020, 2 specimens (WAM V11642). Cape Keraudren, 19°57′51.30″S 119°47′16.94″E, 5 November 2020, male epitoke, 1 specimen (WAM V11643). North West Cape, Ningaloo, 21°47′35.17″S 114°10′22.77″E, 27 September 2020, 3 specimens (WAM V11644). Lighthouse Bay, Ningaloo, 21°48′19.86″S 114°07′48.61″E, 26 September 2020, 1 specimen (WAM V11645). Jurabi, Ningaloo, 21°50′44.05″S 114°02′09.22″E, 25 September 2020, 6 specimens (WAM V11646). Yardie Creek, Ningaloo, 22°19′35.90″S 113°48′33.70″E, 24 September 2020, 5 specimens (WAM V11647). Bateman Bay, 23°02′32.68″S 113°49′39.59″E, 20 September 2020, 1 specimen (WAM V11648). Gnaraloo, 23°46′21.83″S 113°32′09.24″E, 22 September 2020, 3 specimens (WAM V11649). Shag Rock Beach, Nambung, 30°35′40.00″S 115°06′11.00″E, 31 December 2020, 4 specimens (WAM V11650). Comparative material. Nereis denhamensis, det. C. Glasby, East Point, Northern Territory, 12°25′S 130°49′E, coll. C. Glasby, 28 October 2003, 2 (NTM W19015). Description. Complete specimens with 57–62 chaetigers, body 16.1–25.4 mm long and 1.0– 1.8 mm wide; cream yellow to reddish brown in alcohol. Incomplete specimens with 31–55 chaetigers, posterior end missing, remaining body 10.4–32.5 mm long and 0.9–2.0 mm wide; cream yellow to reddish brown in alcohol. Prostomium longer than wide. Eyes black, two pairs, equal sizes, in trapezoidal arrangement. Palps one pair, palpophores globose, palpostyles conical. Antennae one pair, shorter than palps. Tentacular cirri four pairs with basal articulation, longest one extending to chaetiger 1–3 (Fig. 8A). Pharyngeal jaws translucent reddish black, curved at tips, with eight teeth on each jaw. Paragnaths translucent reddish black, conical, present on maxillary and oral rings, arranged as follows: Area I= 1–3, Area II= 14–16 in two rows, Area III= 13–18 in 3–4 irregular rows, Area IV= 19–21 in four curved rows, Area V= 0, Area VI= 5–11 very small paragnaths in two rows, Areas VII–VIII= 10–13 in one row (Fig. 8B). Apodous segment about twice longer than first chaetiger. First two chaetigers uniramous. Notopodia present with digitiform dorsal and ventral ligules in anterior chaetigers, basal dorsal ligules enlarged in posterior chaetigers. Dorsal cirri cirriform, attached on middle of dorsal parapodia, about three times longer than dorsal ligules. Neuropodia with subconical ventral ligules, acicular ligules, and rounded postchaetal lobes extending slightly below acicular ligule tips; ventral ligules become digitiform in posterior chaetigers. Ventral cirri cirriform, attached basally on ventral parapodia, slightly shorter than ventral ligules (Fig. 8C). Notochaetae present with homogomph spinigers in anterior chaetigers, homogomph falcigers (Fig. 8D) from chaetiger 15–21. Notopodial falcigerous blades short, with terminal and one lateral tooth, and two smaller teeth basally. Neurochaetae present with homogomph spinigers (Fig. 8E) and heterogomph falcigers in dorsal fascicles, heterogomph spinigers (Fig. 9F) and falcigers (Fig. 8G) in ventral fascicles. All spinigerous blades long, with fine serrations. Neuropodial falcigerous blades short, with fine serrations. Acicula black. Pygidium with anus on dorsal side, anal cirri cirriform, as long as last three to five chaetigers. A complete, male epitokous specimen with 56 chaetigers, body 21.1 mm long and 1.0 mm wide; cream yellow in alcohol. Specimen present black, enlarged, overlapping paired eyes, in rectangular arrangement. Body divided into 16 pre-natatory chaetigers, 23 natatory chaetigers, and 17 post-natatory chaetigers. Neuropodial postchaetal lobes modified into large, flat lamella in natatory chaetigers. In natatory chaetigers, dorsal cirri crenulated basally along outer margin of about two-third part and developing a small basal lamella. Ventral cirri unmodified but developing a small basal lamella in natatory chaetigers. Paddle-shaped notochaetae present in natatory chaetigers. Remarks. Nereis denhamensis has been synonymised with N. jacksoni Kinberg, 1865 by Augener (1922b), Fauvel (1932, 1953), and Hartmann-Schröder (1979, 1980, 1984), but others have kept them as distinct species due to differences in parapodia and notopodial homogomph falcigers (Kott 1951; Hartman 1954; Hutchings & Turvey 1982; Wilson 1985). Paragnaths on Areas I and III can be fewer (0–1 cone) but it is rare (Hartmann-Schröder 1980; Hutchings & Turvey 1982; Hartmann-Schröder 1984) and only occur in small specimens (Wilson 1985). In specimens from Victoria, paragnaths on Areas VII–VIII can be arranged in 1–2 rows (Wilson 1985). Anal cirri can extend to last 5–10 chaetigers (Hutchings & Turvey 1982), longer than those of our specimens. Pre-natatory chaetigers of our male epitoke are same as those of a male epitoke examined by Glasby et al. (2013) but two more chaetigers than those of male epitokes examined by Kott (1951) and Hartman (1954). A comparative specimen from Northern Territory agreed in all aspects with the description above except in Areas VII–VIII, where there were 15 paragnaths in one row (Fig. 19G–H). Distribution. Australia: Northern Territory, Western Australia, and South Australia (Table 2). Habitat. Intertidal, subtidal, rocky shores, inshore reefs, artificial hard substrates (Table 2)., Published as part of Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto, 2023, Nereididae (Annelida: Phyllodocida) from intertidal macroalgae in Western Australia, pp. 151-203 in Zootaxa 5239 (2) on pages 166-168, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5239.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7624123, {"references":["Augener, H. (1913) Polychaeta I, Errantia. In: Michaelsen, W. & Hartmeyer, R. (Eds.), Die Fauna Sudwest-Australiens. Ergebnisse der Hamburger Sudwest-Australischen Forschungsreise 1905. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp. 65 - 304.","Fauvel, P. (1917) Annelides Polychetes de L'Australie meridionale. Archives de Zoologie Experimentale et Generale, 56, 159 - 277.","Kott, P. (1951) Nereididae and Eunicidae of south Western Australia; also notes on the ecology of Western Australian limestone reefs. Journal and Proceedings of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 35, 85 - 130.","Hartman, O. (1954) Australian Nereidae including descriptions of three new species and one genus, together with summaries of previous records and keys to species. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 77, 1 - 41.","Hutchings, P. A. & Turvey, S. (1982) The Nereididae of South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 106, 93 - 144.","Wilson, R. S. (1985) Nereis and Platynereis (Polychaeta: Nereididae) from Victoria with description of a new species of Nereis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 97, 129 - 138.","Glasby, C. J., Wei, N. - W. V. & Gibb, K. S. (2013) Cryptic species of Nereididae (Annelida: Polychaeta) on Australian coral reefs. Invertebrate Systematics, 27, 245 - 264. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IS 12031","Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1980) Die polychaeten der tropischen Nordwestk ¸ ste Australiens (zwischen Port Samson im Norden und Exmouth im S ¸ den). In: Hartmann-Schroder, G. & Hartmann, G. (Eds.), Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Kusten unter besonder Berucksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Vol. 77. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen zoologischen Museum und Institut, Hamburg, pp. 41 - 110.","Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1984) Die polychaeten der antiborealen S ¸ dk ¸ ste Australiens (zwischen Albany im Westen und Ceduna im Osten). Teil 10. In: Hartmann-Schroder, G. & Hartmann, G. (Eds.), Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Kusten unter besonder Berucksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Vol. 81. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen zoologischen Museum und Institut, Hamburg, pp. 7 - 62.","Kinberg, J. (1865) Annulata nova. Ofversigt Kongliga Vetenskaps-akademiens forhandlingar Stockholm, 22, 167 - 179.","Augener, H. (1922 b) Revision der Australischen polychaeten-typen, van Kinberg. Arkiv For Zoologi, XIV, 1 - 42.","Fauvel, P. (1932) Annelida Polychaeta of the Indian Museum, Calcutta. Memoirs of the Indian Museum, 12, 1 - 262.","Fauvel, P. (1953) Annelida Polychaeta. In: Seymour Sewell, R. B. (Ed.), The Fauna of India, including Pakistan, Ceylon, Burma and Malaya. The Indian Press Ltd, Allahabad, pp. 1 - 507.","Hartmann-Schroder, G. (1979) Die polychaeten der tropischen Nordwestk ¸ ste Australiens (zwischen Derby im Norden und Port Hedland im S ¸ den). Teil 2 und Teil 3. In: Hartmann-Schroder, G. & Hartmann, G. (Eds.), Zur Kenntnis des Eulitorals der australischen Kusten unter besonder Berucksichtigung der Polychaeten und Ostracoden. Vol. 76. Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburgischen zoologischen Museum und Institut, Hamburg, pp. 77 - 218."]}

Pseudonereis anomala Gravier, 1899 Fig. 17A–F Pseudonereis anomala Gravier, 1989b: 290–292, figs 5–9; Day 1967: 333, fig. 14.12.g–j; Hutchings & Turvey 1982: 141–142; Hylleberg et al. 1986: 13–14, fig. 7; Hutchings & Glasby 1985: 108–109; Çinar & Ergen 2005: 316–318, fig. 4A–D; Bakken 2007: 148–152, figs 2–3; Glasby et al. 2013: 259, figs 6A, 7A, B. Type locality. Djibouti, Gulf of Aden. Material examined. Western Australia: False Cape Bosut, Bidyadanga, 18°34′18.40″S 121°43′42.87″E, 3 November 2020, 1 specimen (WAM V11690). Cape Keraudren, 19°57′51.30″S 119°47′16.94″E, 5 November 2020, 1 specimen (WAM V11691). Description. Complete specimens with 57–76 chaetigers, body 13.5–37.3 mm long and 1.0–2.0 mm wide; cream yellow in alcohol. Prostomium as long as wide. Eyes black, two pairs, equal size, in trapezoidal arrangement. Eyes two pairs, equal size. Palps one pair, palpophores globose, palpostyles conical.Antennae one pair, shorter than palps. Tentacular cirri four pairs with basal articulation, longest one extending to chaetiger 3. Pharyngeal jaws black, curved at tips, with eight teeth on each jaw. Paragnaths translucent brown, present on maxillary and oral rings, arranged as follows: Area I= 1–3 cones, Area II= 16–23 p-bars in a triangle, Area III= 32–58 p-bars in 3–4 rows, Area IV= 32–33 p-bars in four curved rows, Area V= 0, Area VI= 5–8 cones in one row, Areas VII–VIII= 12–15 cones in one row (Fig. 17A). Apodous segment as long as first chaetiger. First two chaetigers uniramous. Notopodia present with digitiform dorsal and ventral ligules, dorsal ligules prolonged in posterior chaetigers. Dorsal cirri cirriform, attached on middle of dorsal parapodia, about three times longer than dorsal ligules. Neuropodia with digitiform ventral ligules, acicular ligules, and triangular postchaetal lobes extending below acicular ligule tips. Ventral cirri cirriform, attached basally on ventral parapodia, as long as ventral ligules (Fig. 17B). Notochaetae present with homogomph spinigers (Fig. 17C) in anterior chaetigers, homogomph falcigers (Fig. 17D) from chaetiger 23–39. Notopodial falcigerous blades medium-sized, with fine serrations. Neurochaetae present with heterogomph falcigers (Fig. 17E) and homogomph spinigers in dorsal fascicles, heterogomph spinigers (Fig. 17F) and falcigers in ventral fascicles. All spinigerous blades long, with fine serrations. Neuropodial falcigerous blades short, with fine serrations. Acicula black. Pygidium with anus on dorsal side, anal cirri cirriform, as long as last three chaetigers. Remarks. In specimens collected from Thailand, paragnaths on Area VI are arranged in 1–2 rows (Hylleberg et al. 1986). The tentacular and anal cirri of our specimens are shorter than those of materials examined by Bakken (2007). Notopodial homogomph falcigers can be present from chaetiger 5 to mid-body (Glasby et al. 2013), earlier than those of our specimens. It is noteworthy that the Indonesian species Pseudonereis trimaculata (Horst, 1924) has been found just to the north of the present specimens in Tranquil Bay (13°56′S 127°18′E) intertidally in a sandy bay with rocky headlands (NTM W19035). It can easily be distinguished from P. anomala by the form of paragnaths in Area VI (see key below). Distribution. Tropical Indian Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Aegean Sea (Table 2). Habitat. Intertidal, estuary, subtidal, rocky shores, sand (Table 2)., Published as part of Hadiyanto, Hadiyanto, 2023, Nereididae (Annelida: Phyllodocida) from intertidal macroalgae in Western Australia, pp. 151-203 in Zootaxa 5239 (2) on pages 182-183, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5239.2.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7624123, {"references":["Day, J. H. (1967) A Monograph of the Polychaeta of Southern Africa. Part 1 Errantia. British Museum of Natural History Publication No. 656. British Museum of Natural History, London, 458 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8596","Hutchings, P. A. & Turvey, S. (1982) The Nereididae of South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 106, 93 - 144.","Hylleberg, J., Nateewathana, A. & Bussarawit, S. (1986) Polychaetes of Thailand. Nereidae (part 1); Perinereis and Pseudonereis with notes on species of commercial value. Phuket Marine Biological Center, Research Bulletin, 43, 1 - 22.","Hutchings, P. A. & Glasby, C. J. (1985) Additional nereidids (Polychaeta) from eastern Australia, together with a redescription of Namanereis quadraticeps (Gay) and the synonymising of Ceratonereis pseudoerythraeensis Hutchings & Turvey with C. aequisetis (Augener). Records of the Australian Museum, 37, 101 - 110. https: // doi. org / 10.3853 / j. 0067 - 1975.37.1985.339","Cinar, M. E. & Ergen, Z. (2005) Lessepsian migrants expanding their distributional ranges; Pseudonereis anomala (Polychaeta: Nereididae) in Izmir Bay (Aegean Sea). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 85, 313 - 321. https: // doi. org / 10.1017 / S 0025315405011203 h","Bakken, T. (2007) Revision of Pseudonereis (Polychaeta, Nereididae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 150, 145 - 176. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1096 - 3642.2007.00289. x","Glasby, C. J., Wei, N. - W. V. & Gibb, K. S. (2013) Cryptic species of Nereididae (Annelida: Polychaeta) on Australian coral reefs. Invertebrate Systematics, 27, 245 - 264. https: // doi. org / 10.1071 / IS 12031","Horst, R. (1924) Polychaeta Errantia of the Siboga Expedition. Pt. 3. Nereidae and Hesionidae. Siboga-Expeditie Uitkomsten op Zoologisch, Bonatisch, Oceanographisch en Geologisch gebied verzameld in Nederlandsch Oost-Indie 1899 - 1900, 24 (1 c), 145 - 198"]}

Trichrysis tonkinensis (Mocsáry, 1914) Fig. 7H Chrysis (Trichrysis) tonkinensis Mocsáry, 1914: 25. Trichrysis tonkinensis – Rosa et al. 2016: 126, figs. 61–66, 127; 2021a: 83, fig. 84. Material examined Holotype VIETNAM • &female;; Tonkin, China; “ tonkinensis Mocs. typ. det. Mocsáry” [red label]; Holotypus Chrysis tonkinensis Mocs. &female; RM Bohart; id nr. 135549 HNHM Hym.coll.”; HNHM. Other material INDIA • 1 &female;; Puducherry, Nedungadu; Oct. 1932; P.S. Nathan leg.; NMLU. Distribution India (Puducherry). China (Fujian, Yunnan); Vietnam; Philippines; Indonesia, Malaysia (Rosa et al. 2016)., Published as part of Bijoy, Paolo Rosa Pokkattu Gopi Aswathi Bogdan Wiśniowski Chenthamarakshan, 2022, Preliminary revision of the Indian cuckoo wasp genera Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 and Chrysidea Bischoff, 1910, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae), pp. 117-143 in European Journal of Taxonomy 852 on page 132, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.852.2017, http://zenodo.org/record/7501490, {"references":["Mocsary A. 1914. Chrysididae plerumque exoticae novae. Annales Historico-naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici 12: 1 - 74.","Rosa P., Wei N. - S., Feng J. & Xu Z-f. 2016. Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 63 (1): 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Rosa P., Aswathi P. G. & Bijoy C. 2021 a. An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Zootaxa 4929 (1): 1 - 100. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4929.1.1"]}

Trichrysis imperiosa (Smith, 1874) Fig. 7B Chrysis imperiosus Smith, 1874: 460. Chrysis imperiosa – du Buysson 1898a: 142. — Bingham 1903: 438 (in key), 479–480, fig. 159, pl. I fig. 13. Chrysis (Pentachrysis) imperiosa – Bischoff 1910: 486. Chrysis (Trichrysis) imperiosa – Roy & Kundu 1985: 227. Praestochrysis lusca – Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 533. Praestochrysis imperiosa – Strumia 1996: 62, fig. 3. Trichrysis imperiosa – Rosa et al. 2021a: 79, fig. 80. Material examined Lectotype AUSTRALIA • &female;; “50, 70”; “ Chrysis, imperiosus, Type Smith”; “B.M. TYPE HYM 13.146”; “Lectotype Chrysis imperiosus &female;, F. Smith, R.M. Bohart ”; “Lectotype”; “BMNH(E) #970896”; BMNH. Other material INDIA • 3 &female;&female;; Meghalaya, Khasia Hills; ETHZ • 1 &female;, Kerala, Travancore; May 1935; NMLU • 1 &female;; Kerala, Quilon (= Kollam), Thenmala; leg. Nathan; PRC. Distribution India (Assam, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Sikkim, West Bengal, Arunachal Pradesh); China (Taiwan, Hunan, Guangdong, Hainan) (Rosa et al. 2016); Australia, Myanmar, Sri Lanka (Bingham 1903); Vietnam (Kimsey & Bohart 1991); Indonesia, Nepal, Papua New Guinea, Thailand (Rosa et al. 2016). Remarks Although further revision is required, multiple species are to be included under the name of Trichrysis imperiosa. The Indian species could belong to Trichrysis cupreidorsus (Tsuneki, 1963) (Rosa et al. 2021a), described from Thailand and synonymised by Kimsey & Bohart (1991) with Praestochrysis lusca (Fabricius, 1804), without type examination. For the moment, we maintain the assessment given by Rosa et al. (2021a)., Published as part of Bijoy, Paolo Rosa Pokkattu Gopi Aswathi Bogdan Wiśniowski Chenthamarakshan, 2022, Preliminary revision of the Indian cuckoo wasp genera Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 and Chrysidea Bischoff, 1910, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae), pp. 117-143 in European Journal of Taxonomy 852 on pages 123-124, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.852.2017, http://zenodo.org/record/7501490, {"references":["Smith F. 1874. A revision of the Hymenopterous genera Cleptes, Parnopes, Pyria and Stilbum, with descriptions of new species of those genera, and also of new species of the genus Chrysis from North China and Australia. Transactions of the Entomological Society of London 7: 451 - 471. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1365 - 2311.1874. tb 00175. x","du Buysson R. 1898 a. Contribution aux Chrysides du Globe (3 e serie). Revue d'Entomologie 17: 125 - 147.","Bingham C. T. 1903. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor & Francis, London.","Bischoff H. 1910. Die Chrysididen des Koniglichen Zoologischen Museums zu Berlin. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin 4 (3): 427 - 493.","Roy S. B. & Kundu B. G. 1985. Insecta: Hymenoptera. Records of the Zoological Survey of India 82 (1 - 4): 221 - 229.","Kimsey L. S. & Bohart R. M. 1991 [1990]. The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.","Strumia F. 1996. Praestochrysis from India and South-East Asia (Hymenoptera Chrysididae). Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana 128 (1): 57 - 64.","Rosa P., Aswathi P. G. & Bijoy C. 2021 a. An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Zootaxa 4929 (1): 1 - 100. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4929.1.1","Rosa P., Wei N. - S., Feng J. & Xu Z-f. 2016. Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 63 (1): 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Tsuneki K. 1963. Chrysididae and Sphecidae from Thailand (Hymenoptera). Etizenia 4: 1 - 3.","Fabricius J. C. 1804. Systema Piezatorum Secundum Ordines, Genera, Species, Adiectis Synonymis, Locis, Observationibus, Descriptionibus. Carolum Reichard, Brunsvigae [Brunswick]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 12548"]}

Trichrysis lusca (Fabricius, 1804) Figs 4, 7C Chrysis lusca Fabricius, 1804: 171. Chrysis lusca – du Buysson 1896: 475 (in key), 476. — Dalla Torre 1892: 76. — du Buysson 1898b: 76. — du Buysson 1900: 153. — Bingham 1903: 439 (in key), 484; 1908: 349. — Jonathan et al. 1977: 87. — Thakkar & Parikh 2018: 22. Chrysis (Pentachrysis) lusca – Mocsáry 1889: 527–528. — Bischoff 1913: 62. Praestochrysis lusca – Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 533. Trichrysis lusca – Suresh et al. 1999: 2. — Mathew 2004: 219. — Rosa et al. 2021a: 81, fig. 82. Material examined Holotype ITALY [given in the original description] • &female; [square green label]; “TYPE”; “Schlanbusch, Mus: T: Lund, Chrysis, lusca, Fabr. ”; “ Chrysis lusca F., Syst. Piez. 1804.171.7”; “ ZMUC 00241218 ”; ZMUC. Other material INDIA • 2 &female;&female;; Karikal, Malabar; without further data; NHMW • 1 &female;; Kerala, Kannur, Ulikkal; 12°01′ N, 75°40′ E; 5 Feb. 2021; A.S. Prakash leg.; CCSERLC118; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Ernakulam, Moothakunnam; 10°11′ N, 76°12’,E; 27 Jul. 2020, N.A. Kashmeera leg.; CCSERLC87; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Kozhikode, Malaparamba; 11°17′ N, 75°48′ E; 3 Feb. 2021; P.G. Aswathi leg.; CCSERLC112; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Kasargod, Periyanganam; 12°18′ N, 75°15′ E; 28 Feb. 2020; sweep net; CCSERLC13; SERL • 3 &female;&female;; Kerala, Idukki, Marakkanam; 9°57′ N, 77°02′ E; 19 Apr. 2020; T.D. Dhanoop leg.; CCSERLC182 to 184; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Thenmala; May 1985; Nathan leg.; PRC • 1 &female;; Kerala, Wayanad, Kambalakkad; 11°40′ N, 76°05′ E; 19 Mar. 2020; CCSERLC24; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Wayanad, Kallur; 11°39′ N, 76°19′ E; 20 Nov. 2020; sweep net; P.G. Aswathi leg.; CCSERLC93; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Wayanad, Mananthavady; 11°46′ N, 75°59′ E; 20 Jan. 2021; P.G. Aswathi leg.; CCSERLC99; SERL • 1 &female;; Kerala, Wayanad, Vakery; 11°41′ N, 76°12′ E; 5 May 2020; P.G. Aswathi leg.; CCSERLC79; SERL • 12 &female;&female;; Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore; without further data; NHMW • 1 &female;; Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore; Aug. 1932; Nathan leg.; NMLU • 1 &female;; Tamil Nadu, Kurumbagaram; 22 Sep. 1951; S. Nathan leg.; NMLU • 3 &female;&female;; Tamil Nadu, Kurumbagaram; Sep. 1951; MNLU • 1 &female;; Tamil Nadu, Settipatti; 13 Jun. 1975; W. Perraudin leg.; NMLU • 1 &female;; same locality data as for preceding; 16 Jun. 1975; NMLU • 1 &female;; same locality data as for preceding; 3 Jul. 1976; NMLU • 3 &female;; same locality data as for preceding; Nov. 1979; MNLU • 1 &female;; Tamil Nadu, Omalur, Salem Settipatti; 14 Oct. 1975; W. Perraudin leg.; NMLU • 1 &female;; same locality data as for preceding; 5 Nov. 1975; NMLU • 1 &female;; same locality data as for preceding; 29 Nov. 1975; NMLU • 4 &female;&female;; same locality data as for preceding; Mar. 1978; NMLU. Distribution India (Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Karnataka, Kerala, Maharashtra, Odisha, Puducherry, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Rajarampore, Nilgiris); China (Hubei, Hunan, Taiwan, Fujian, Guangdong, Macao, Hainan, Guizhou, Yunnan) (Rosa et al. 2016); Australia, Japan, Korea, Madagascar, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand (Kimsey & Bohart 1991); Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar (Jonathan et al. 1977), Sri Lanka, Vietnam (Rosa et al. 2016). Afrotropical: Mauritius and Réunion (Azevedo et al. 2010)., Published as part of Bijoy, Paolo Rosa Pokkattu Gopi Aswathi Bogdan Wiśniowski Chenthamarakshan, 2022, Preliminary revision of the Indian cuckoo wasp genera Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 and Chrysidea Bischoff, 1910, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae), pp. 117-143 in European Journal of Taxonomy 852 on pages 128-129, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.852.2017, http://zenodo.org/record/7501490, {"references":["Fabricius J. C. 1804. Systema Piezatorum Secundum Ordines, Genera, Species, Adiectis Synonymis, Locis, Observationibus, Descriptionibus. Carolum Reichard, Brunsvigae [Brunswick]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 12548","du Buysson R. 1896. Premiere contribution a la connaissance des Chrysidides de l'Inde. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 10: 462 - 481.","Dalla Torre C. G. de. 1892. Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. VI. Chrysididae (Tubulifera). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig [Lipsia]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10348","du Buysson R. 1898 b (1897). Etude des Chrysidides du Museum de Paris. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France 66: 518 - 580.","du Buysson R. 1900. Contribution aux Chrysidides du Globe (4 e serie). Revue d'Entomologie 19: 125 - 165.","Bingham C. T. 1903. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor & Francis, London.","Bingham C. T. 1908. Notes on Aculeate Hymenoptera in the Indian Museum. Part I. Records of the Indian Museum 2: 347 - 349.","Jonathan J. K., Roy S. B. & Dhar M. 1977. On a collection of cuckoo wasps from India and Bhutan (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Newsletter Zoological Survey of India 32: 85 - 87.","Thakkar B. & Parikh P. 2018. An inventory on diversity and distribution pattern of Hymenopteran Insects in Gujarat, India. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences 6: 19 - 32. https: // doi. org / 10.26438 / ijsrbs / v 6 i 5.1925","Mocsary A. 1889. Monographia Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Hungarian Academy of Science, Typis Societatis Franklinianae, Budapest.","Bischoff H. 1913. Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman P. (ed.) Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. L. Desmet-Verteneuil, Bruxelles.","Kimsey L. S. & Bohart R. M. 1991 [1990]. The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.","Suresh P. V., Sudheendrakumar V. V., Binoy C. F., Mathew G. & Narendran T. C. 1999. The macro hymenopteran fauna of Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary. Zoos' Print 24 (4): 1 - 2. https: // doi. org / 10.11609 / JoTT. ZPJ. 14.4.1 - 2","Mathew G. 2004. Biodiversity Documentation for Kerala. Part 7. Insects. Kerala Forest Research Institute Peechi, Thrissur.","Rosa P., Aswathi P. G. & Bijoy C. 2021 a. An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Zootaxa 4929 (1): 1 - 100. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4929.1.1","Rosa P., Wei N. - S., Feng J. & Xu Z-f. 2016. Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 63 (1): 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Azevedo C. O., Madl M. & Olmi M. 2010. A Catalogue of the Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Embolemidae, Sclerogibbidae and Scolebythidae of the Malagasy Subregion (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea). Linzer Biologische Beitrage 42 (2): 845 - 918."]}

Trichrysis bengalensis (Mocsáry, 1889) stat. rev. Fig. 1 Chrysis (Trichrysis) bengalensis Mocsáry, 1889: 527. Chrysis bengalensis: – Dalla Torre 1892: 47. — Bingham 1903: 439 (in key), 482–483; 1908: 349. Chrysis (Pentachrysis) bengalensis: – Bischoff 1913: 62. Praestochrysis lusca: – Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 533. Material examined Holotype INDIA • &female;; Bombay, Maharastra; “Bombay, [leg.] Stockinger”; 755–1; “ Bengalensis Mocs. typ. det. Mocsáry”; “ Chrysis lusca F. Linsenmaier det. 62”; “ Holotypus Chrysis bengalensis &female; Mocs. RMB ”; “id nr. 135510 HNHM Hym.coll.”; HNHM. Distribution India (Maharashtra; possibly Tamil Nadu: Chennai [= Madras] (Bingham 1903)). Remarks The holotype of Chrysis bengalensis Mocsáry, 1889 (Fig. 1) is different from the examined specimens of Trichrysis lusca (Fig. 3), as described by Mocsáry (1889) and Bingham (1903). In addition to the uniform dark blue colouration (vs more extensively green to light blue in T. lusca) and the dark brown wings (vs light fusco-hyaline in T. lusca), it is coarsely punctured with large and deeper punctures, compared to T. lusca; the TFC is close to the upper margin of the scapal basin and without the vertical frontal carina that originated from the mid TFC and bisecting the upper frons, as in T. lusca (compare Rosa et al. 2016: fig. 40); the two lateral, upward branches of the TFC are raised (vs irregular); the pit row has large and deep pits (vs small); the apical margin bears three pointed teeth with an angle between the median and the lateral tooth instead of five distinct, short teeth; intervals between teeth are wider than in T. lusca. Based on the type examination, and the characters listed above, we consider T. bengalensis as a valid species, and we here resurrect it from the previous synonymy with Praestochrysis lusca proposed by Kimsey & Bohart (1991). The placement of the lusca species group in the genus Trichrysis rather than in the genus Praestochrysis was already discussed by Linsenmaier (1997) and Rosa et al. (2016). Other specimens examined from the Oriental region show differences from the type of Trichrysis lusca (Fig. 3) and are very likely members of a species complex, which is worthy of further investigation., Published as part of Bijoy, Paolo Rosa Pokkattu Gopi Aswathi Bogdan Wiśniowski Chenthamarakshan, 2022, Preliminary revision of the Indian cuckoo wasp genera Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 and Chrysidea Bischoff, 1910, with description of a new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae), pp. 117-143 in European Journal of Taxonomy 852 on pages 121-123, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2022.852.2017, http://zenodo.org/record/7501490, {"references":["Mocsary A. 1889. Monographia Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Hungarian Academy of Science, Typis Societatis Franklinianae, Budapest.","Dalla Torre C. G. de. 1892. Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. VI. Chrysididae (Tubulifera). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig [Lipsia]. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10348","Bingham C. T. 1903. The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor & Francis, London.","Bingham C. T. 1908. Notes on Aculeate Hymenoptera in the Indian Museum. Part I. Records of the Indian Museum 2: 347 - 349.","Bischoff H. 1913. Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman P. (ed.) Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. L. Desmet-Verteneuil, Bruxelles.","Kimsey L. S. & Bohart R. M. 1991 [1990]. The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York.","Rosa P., Wei N. - S., Feng J. & Xu Z-f. 2016. Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift 63 (1): 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Linsenmaier W. 1997. Altes und Neues von den Chrysididen. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Entomofauna 18 (19): 245 - 300."]}

Hedychrum aureicolle niemelai Linsenmaier, 1959 (Fig. 1) Hedychrum aureicolle ssp. niemeläi Linsenmaier, 1959: 38 (decr.), 186 (cat.), 197 (figs. 62–64); 1969: 350 (tax.); 1997b: 33 (key), 61 (tax.), 62 (distr., biol., fig. 32). Rosa et al. 2014: 88 (plate 14, type). Type locality. Switzerland: “ Mir vorliegend aus Portugal, Spanien, Korsika, Frankreich, Italien und Sizilien, Schweiz, Deutschland, Holland, England, Fennoskandien, Polen, Österreich, Ungarn, Jugoslawien, Mandschurei. &female; Type (Schweiz, Wallis) Coll. m., &male; Allotype (Wallis) Coll. Verhoeff ”. Holotype, &female; and other two male specimens glued on the same plastic-board: Wallis B 550m 12. VI.46 Linsenmaier // &female; Type Hedychrum Latr. aureicolle Mocs. niemeläi Lins. Linsenmaier det. 1959 (ex type-collection) // NML _ENT GBIF _Chr00006458. Remarks. The allotype is currently deposited at RMNH, together with the rest of the Verhoeff collection. It bears the following labels: Wallis Sierre 5.7.51 Linsenmaier // Allotype &male; Hedychrum Latr. aureicollis [!] M. ssp. niemeläi Lins. Linsenmaier det. 57 // Museum Leiden ex coll. Verhoeff // Allotype. During the digitalization of the Linsenmaier collection, Rosa et al. (2015) considered the other specimens listed by Linsenmaier (1959) as possible paratypes according to the Art. 72.4.1.1 of the Code: “For a nominal species or subspecies established before 2000, any evidence, published or unpublished, may be taken into account to determine what specimens constitute the type series”. In fact, Linsenmaier labelled a specimen from Wallis as paratype and it was impossible to evaluate how many specimens could have been labelled as paratypes in other collections, as observed for many other species (Rosa et al. 2015). The specimens from the localities listed by Linsenmaier in the original description and identified in 1959 bear the following labels “ Hedychrum Ltr. aureicolle ssp niemelai Lins. Linsenmaier det. 59” and “ Paratype P. Rosa vidit 2010 GBIF Chrysididae ”. They are listed here: AUSTRIA: 1&male;: Wien Mader // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006169; 4&male;: N. Österreich Hainburg 5.37 I. Blühweiss Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006170; 4&male; and 4&female;: Oberweiden a.d. March leg. Mader Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr0006171; 1&female;: Wien, Donau-Auen J. Schischma // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006172. HUNGARY: 1&male;: Umg. Budapest 11.–23.VI.25 Dr. Enslin // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006178; 1&male;: Ungarn Nemet Bogsan Coll. Dr. Enslin Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006179. BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA 1 &female;: Herzergov. Nevesinje // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006277. CHINA: 1&female;: Mandschurei Charbin 20.7.53 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006293. CROATIA: 1&male;: Istria Ica-Umgebg. 6.29 Mader Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006272. FRANCE: 1&male;: France – Vaucluse Carpentras 15.–23.V.1953 PMFVerhoeff // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006190; 1&male;: France Forêt de Carnelle 7.23 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006192; 1&female;: France Etrechy 13.8.22 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006193; 1&female;: France La Bernerie Loire infer. 7.1900 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006194; 1&female;: France Fontainebleau 15.9.1900 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006195; 1&male;: France Epinay Villetaneuse 18.7.20 Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006196; 1&male;: Museum Paris Fouesnant (Finistère) Alain Hémon 1927 // Foues. 28.7.22 // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006197; 1&male;: Cotes-du-Nord Lamballe J. Surcouf // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006198; 1&male; and 5&female;: France Vaucl. Carpentras 15.VII.57 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006200–NML_ENT GBIF_ Chr00006202. &male; GERMANY: 2&male;: Kaiserstuhl Achk. Baden 15.– 28.8.1954 Gremminger // Grötzingen Baden 3.8.1954 Gremminger // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006154; 2&male; and 2&female;: Kaiserstuhl Achk. Baden 15.– 28.8.1954 Gremminger // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006155 and NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006157; 1 &male;: Berghausen Baden 8.9.54 Gremminger // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006156; 2&female;: Berghausen Baden 27.7.55 Gremminger // Berghausen Baden 11.6.55 Gremminger //NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006158; 2&female;: Grötzingen Baden 12.7.54 Gremminger // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006159. ITALY: 1&male;: Sicilia // 486 [Coll. Frey-Gessner] // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006268; 14.VI.[18]77 Sicilia // Motta 13.VI.[18]77 // NML_ENT_GBIF_Chr00006269; 1&female;: 15.VI.[18]77 Sicilia // 575 [Coll. Frey-Gessner] // Frey-G. det // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006270; 1&female;: Sicilia Taormina 20.5.22 (Schulth.) // NML_ ENT GBIF_Chr00006271. PORTUGAL: 2&male; and 2&female;: Portugal Douro Resende 16.–19.VII.1953 PMF Verhoeff // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006253–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006256; 2&female;: Evora (Port.) 4.7.1953 leg. Andrade // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006257–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006258. SLOVENIA: 1&male; and 1&female;: Strugnano Istr. Juni 31 Madera // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006273–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006274; 2&male; and 2&female;: Istrien Pirano 6.28 Madera Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006275. SPAIN: 1&male;: Prov. Soria 1200m 29.6.47 Villar del Ala leg. Dr. Marten Linsenmaier // schienen Grüppchen undeutlich // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006211; 1&male; and 2&female;: Spanien 7.49 Prov. Zamora Ribadelago Dr. Marten Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006212–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006214; 5&male;: Spanien 7.49 Prov. Zamora Ribadelago 1000m Dr. Marten Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006215; 1&male; and 1&female;: Spanien Castellon Sierra Montnegrelo 1000m 7.44 leg. Dr. W. Marten Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006216; &female;: Spanien 1100m 7.48 Prov. Soria Valdeavellano d. Tera leg. Dr. Marten Coll. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006217; 1&male; and 1&female;: Playa de Aro Costa Brava H. Pochon 1.–15.6.58 (Sp.) // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006218; 1&male; and 2&female;: Spanien Teruel 6.53 Albarracin leg. Marten // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006219–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006220; 1&male;: Soria 7.7.57 Carbonera Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006221; 1&male; and 5&female;: Spanien Toledo Aranjuez 4.VII.57 leg. Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006222–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006223. SWEDEN: 1&male;: Klm. Ljungby Vassmolarn 5.– 8.8.1927 D. Gaunitz // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006183; 1&male;: Sm. S. Vi. by Nära Nylinge 13.7.1926 D. Gaunitz // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006184; 1&male;: Sm. S. Vi. Nylinge 19.7.29 H. nobile n° 307 // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006185; 1&female;: Klm. Ljungby Vassmolarn 8.7.1927 D. Gaunitz // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006186; 1&female;: Öl. [locality unreadable] // NML_ ENT GBIF_Chr00006187; 1&female;: Öl. Fargerladen 13.7.1938 Coll. D. Gaunitz // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006188; 1&female;: Fennia Ta: Vanaja 30.VII.52 Valkeila // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006189. SWITZERLAND: 1&male;: Wallis C 900 m 5.VII.51 Linsenmaier (ex synoptic-collection) // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006125 // &male; Paratype Hedychrum Ltr. aureicolle ssp niemelai Lins. Linsenmaier det. 59; 2&male; and 3&female;: Wallis B 550 m 26.VIII.48 Linsenmaier (ex synopticcollection) // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006126; 1&female;: Wallis 7.22 A. Susillon // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006128; 1&female;: Murtensee Motier 3.7.50 leg. Pochon Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006129; 2&male; and 1&female;: Wallis B 550m 22.VI.45 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006130; 3&female;: Wallis B 550m 12.VI.46 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006131; 1&male; and 1&female;: Wallis B 550 m 4.7.46 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006132; 2&female;: Wallis A 1100m 5.7.46 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006133; 3&male; and 2&female;: Wallis B 550m 22.VI.47 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006134; 1&male; and 1&female;: Wallis B 550m 29.V.48 Pochon Linsenmaier // NML_ ENT GBIF_Chr00006135; 1 &female;: Wallis B 550m 11.6.48 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006136 // Höcker nicht geteilt; 3&female;: Wallis B 550m 16.6.48 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006137; 3&male; and 2&female;: Wallis B 550m 26.VIII.48 Linsenmaier NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006138–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006140 // Pronotum formen; 1&male; and 3&female;: Wallis C 900m 14.VI.48 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006141; 4&female;: Wallis C 900m 18.VI.49 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006142; 1&male;: Wallis C 900m VII.53 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006143; 4&female;: Wallis B 550m 16.VI.50 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006144; 1&female;: Wallis B 1300m VII.54 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006145; 2&male;: Wallis B 1300m 10.6.56 Linsenmaier // NML_ ENT GBIF_Chr00006146–NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006147; 1&male;: Wallis A-B 650m VII.1958 Linsenmaier // NML_ ENT GBIF_Chr00006148; 2&male; and 2&female;: Wallis C 900m 4.VII.51 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006149; 1&female;: Wallis C 900m 30.V.53 Linsenmaier // NML_ENT GBIF_Chr00006150. Note. In the last years some authors used the incorrect spelling niemelaei instead of the correct name niemelai (e.g. Saure 1998). The incorrect subsequent spelling is also commonly found online. According to the Code of Zoological Nomenclature Art. 32.5. 2.1 in the case of a diacritic mark in a species name, the mark concerned is deleted, except in the case of a name published before 1985 and based upon a German word; in this specific case, the umlaut sign is deleted from the vowel and the letter “e” is inserted after that vowel. As written in the original description, P. Niemelä was Finnish and not German, therefore the correct spelling of the species name is H. niemelai., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Heim, René & Bernasconi, Marco Valerio, 2022, The Palaearctic types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited in the Linsenmaier collection. Part 3. Elampini: genus Hedychrum Latreille, pp. 1-23 in Zootaxa 5195 (1) on pages 3-5, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5195.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/7180585, {"references":["Linsenmaier, W. (1959) Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Berucksichtigung der europaischen Spezies. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32 (1), 1 - 232.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2014) An annotated checklist of the chrysidid wasps (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from China. ZooKeys, 455, 1 - 128. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 455.6557","Saure, C. (1998) Beobachtungen und Anmerkungen zur Wirtsbindung einiger Goldwespenarten im nordostdeutschen Raum (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae: Chrysidinae). bembiX, 10, 15 - 19."]}

Trichrysis tonkinensis (Mocsáry, 1914) (Figs 16–28) Chrysis (Trichrysis) tonkinensis Mocsáry, 1914: 25. Holotype, &female; [not &male;], Vietnam: Tonkin (HNHM) (examined). Material examined. 1&female;: VIETNAM: Tonkin China / tonkinensis Mocs. det. Mocsáry typ. / red label / Holotypus Chrysis tonkinensis Mocs. &female; RM Bohart / id. nr. 135549 HNHM Hym. coll. (HNHM). 2 &female;: VIETNAM; Cao Bang, Nguyen Binh, Quang Thanh / Hoai Khao, Phia Oac-Phia Den NP / 879 m a.s.l.; 10.v.2021 / 22°36′39″N 105°54′40″E / [leg.] NTPL, NQC, TTN (IEBR). 3 &female;: VIETNAM; Ha Tinh, Vu Quang / Vu Quang NP, Khe Che RS / 18°24′33″N 105°18′39″E, 32 m a.s.l. / 20.iv.2022, NTPL, TTN. Diagnosis. Middle-sized species with robust, densely punctate body; colouration mostly golden-green with some olive-green colour on interstices of vertex and mesosoma and blue colour dorsally (Figs 18, 20, 25, 27). Ocellar triangle with dark brownish interstices; dorsal part of pedicel metallic copper. Sublateral, longitudinal carina in pronotum fully developed (Figs 16, 18, 23, 25). TFC raised, straight, medially as an acute angle, laterally bent close to eye margin (Figs 17, 22). Tegula brown to predominantly metallic green; outer margin partly brownishblack. T1 and T2 bright blue dorsally, golden-green laterally and apically. T2 with weak median carina, almost reaching posterior margin (Figs 20, 26). Median tooth on apex of T3 sharp and pointed (Figs 19, 26). S2 black spots trapezoid, fused medially, forming black mark wider than its length (Fig. 28). Redescription. Female (Figs 16–28). Body length 6.5–7.0 mm. Head. Scapal basin deep and punctate, medially with punctures partly fused forming transverse striae (Figs 17, 23). Brow prominent, TFC single, medially slightly inverted V-shaped, recurved laterally. Brow raised between TFC and scapal basin, polished medially, with elongated shallow punctures. Surface of brow above TFC flattened, with dense punctures. BOL 1.5 × MOD. Relative length of P:F1:F2:F3=1.0:2.0:1.2:1.0; F1 l/w=2.6; OOL 1.9 × MOD; POL 2.0 × MOD; MS = MOD; clypeal apex arcuate medially. Mandible simple, without subapical tooth. Malar space with few medium punctures, and with genal carina reaching up to 2/3 of head height. Setae on vertex whitish, not longer than MOD. Ocellar triangle obtuse (Fig. 24). Mesosoma. Median pronotal line moderately deep, not extending to posterior margin of pronotum. Sublateral carina on pronotum fully developed (Figs 16, 18, 23, 25). Punctation on pronotum, mesoscutum and mesoscutellum with variable interstices, 0.2–0.8 × PD; interstices shining and micropunctate. Mesepisternum with large punctures, interstices narrow, 0.1–0.5 × PD. Episternal sulcus and scrobal sulcus with large areolate punctures, about 1.8 × as large as punctures on mesepisternum (Fig. 16). Setae on outer edge of metatibia short, not longer than half their distal width. Metasoma. Metasoma densely punctate; punctures smaller than on mesosoma. Interstices on T1 and T2 0.2–1.0 × PD, polished, almost smooth, with only scattered tiny punctures. T2 with weak median carina, almost reaching posterior margin. T3 punctate and wrinkled before prepit bulge (Fig. 19); prepit bulge slightly convex (Fig. 26); pits large, apical rim wrinkled (Figs 19, 26). Median tooth on apex of T3 sharp and pointed, lateral teeth shorter (Figs 19, 26). Interval between median tooth and lateral tooth broadly incurved. S2 black spots trapezoid, fused medially, forming black mark wider than its length (Fig. 28). Colouration. Body metallic golden green, with some dark brown to olive or blue reflections on pronotum, mesoscutum, mesoscutellum, metanotum and laterally on mesosoma. Terga golden green. Median blue spots on mesoscutum small. Scape metallic green, dorsal part of pedicel metallic copper, rest of flagellum black. Tegula brown in the holotype (Fig. 18), yet predominantly metallic green in recently collected specimens, with only outer margin partly brownish-black. Wings slightly infuscate. Legs metallic bright green, basitarsi greenish, rest of tarsi blackish. Male. Unknown. Distribution. Northern and central Vietnam (Cao Bang & Ha Tinh Provinces). Remarks. The Chinese specimen identified as Trichrysis tonkinensis and illustrated in Rosa et al. (2016) resulted undescribed (see below T. sinica), and we here provide the images of the holotype of T. tonkinensis photographed at HNHM (Figs 16–21). Trichrysis tonkinensis is similar to T. chamchuensis Wi&sacute;niowski & Nguyen in Wi&sacute;niowski et al. (2020) but can be differentiated from the latter by the following characters: BOL 1.5 × MOD, F1 l/w=2.6, OOL 1.9 × MOD (vs. BOL 1.7 × MOD, F1 l/w=3.0, OOL 1.4 × MOD in T. chamchuensis); malar space with few medium punctures (vs. few small punctures); interstices of T1 and T2 narrower, 0.2–1.0 × PD (vs. 0.6–1.2 × PD); T2 with weak median carina, reaching approximately one-third to apex of T2 (vs. T2 with distinct median carina, reaching apex of T2); pits large, not fused into pair of elongated holes on both sides of median keel (vs. pits fused into pair of elongated holes on both sides of median keel); S2 black spots trapezoid (vs. S2 black spots almost triangle); dorsal part of pedicel metallic copper (vs. pedicel metallic green)., Published as part of Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong, Wiśniowski, Bogdan, Tran, Ngat Thi, Tran, Duong Dinh & Rosa, Paolo, 2022, Two new species of Trichrysis Lichtenstein (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Vietnam and China, with taxonomic notes on other species from the Oriental region, pp. 133-143 in Zootaxa 5194 (1) on pages 139-142, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5194.1.8, http://zenodo.org/record/7142119, {"references":["Mocsary, A. (1914) Chrysididae plerumque exoticae novae. Annales historico-naturales Musei nationalis hungarici, 12, 1 - 72.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. S., Feng, J. & Xu, Z. F. (2016) Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 63 (1), 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Wisniowski, B., Nguyen, L. T. P. & Nguyen, C. Q. (2020) Discovery of four new species of Trichrysis Lichtenstein, cyanea species group (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) from Vietnam. Zootaxa, 4881 (1), 165 - 178. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4881.1.10"]}

Women experiencing incarceration (WEI) in the United States are disproportionately impacted by HIV, yet HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is underutilized by women in the United States. In order to inform an intervention to promote PrEP initiation during incarceration and facilitate linkage to PrEP care following release from incarceration, we conducted individual, semistructured qualitative interviews with WEI (N = 21) and key stakeholders (N = 14). While WEI had little or no previous knowledge about PrEP, they viewed it as something that would benefit women involved in the criminal justice system. Participants stated that HIV-related stigma and underestimation of HIV risk might serve as barriers to PrEP initiation during incarceration. Participants reported that competing priorities, difficulty scheduling an appointment, and lack of motivation could interfere with linkage to PrEP care in the community. Further, cost, substance use, and difficulty remembering to take the medication were cited most commonly as likely barriers to adherence.

Supplemental Material for A Test of Minority Stress Theory with Asian Americans by Nina Lei, Brandon L. Velez, Judy M. Seoud, and Wei N. Motulsky in The Counseling Psychologist

9. Dracaena rugosifolia (Webb & Newton 2019b: 11) Takawira-Nyenya & Thiede comb. nov. Basionym:��� Sansevieria rugosifolia R.H.Webb & L.E.Newton in Sansevieria 41: 11 (2019b). Type:���[ex cult. R. H. Webb, USA, Arizona, Tucson, preserved in February 2019.] TANZANIA: Ngare Nanyuki, about 33 km northeast of Arusha, lat. 3.18458�� S, long. 36.85516�� E, elev. 1498 m, collected in about 2010, Bhitala 1008 (holotype MO n.v.)., Published as part of Takawira-Nyenya, Ratidzayi, Thiede, Joachim & Mucina, Ladislav, 2021, New nomenclatural and taxonomic adjustments in Dracaena (Asparagaceae), pp. 293-300 in Phytotaxa 524 (4) on page 295, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.524.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/5656295, {"references":["Webb, R. H. & Newton, L. E. (2019 b) Three new species of Sansevieria in Kenya and Tanzania. Sansevieria 41: 10 - 17. Webb, R. H. & Yinger, B.. (2019) A new subspecies of Sansevieria trifasciata in Tanzania. Sansevieria 41: 2 - 4. Wei, N., Mwachala, G., Hu, G. W & Wang, Q. F. (2021) Dracaena neobella nom. nov., a replacement name for D. bella (L. E. Newton) Byng"]}

5. Dracaena enchiridiofolia (Webb & Newton 2019b: 14) Takawira-Nyenya & Thiede comb. nov. Basionym:��� Sansevieria enchiridiofolia R.H.Webb & L.E.Newton in Sansevieria 41: 14 (2019b). Type:��� TANZANIA. Arusha Province: north of OI Doinyo Sambu, about 30 km north of Arusha, Tanzania, and 60 km south of Namanga, Kenya; lat. 3.09536�� S, long. 36.70509�� E, elev. 1543 m, 27 December 2009, [R. H. Webb & L. E. Newton] Webb-Newton 1055 (holotype MO n.v.)., Published as part of Takawira-Nyenya, Ratidzayi, Thiede, Joachim & Mucina, Ladislav, 2021, New nomenclatural and taxonomic adjustments in Dracaena (Asparagaceae), pp. 293-300 in Phytotaxa 524 (4) on page 294, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.524.4.5, http://zenodo.org/record/5656295, {"references":["Webb, R. H. & Newton, L. E. (2019 b) Three new species of Sansevieria in Kenya and Tanzania. Sansevieria 41: 10 - 17. Webb, R. H. & Yinger, B.. (2019) A new subspecies of Sansevieria trifasciata in Tanzania. Sansevieria 41: 2 - 4. Wei, N., Mwachala, G., Hu, G. W & Wang, Q. F. (2021) Dracaena neobella nom. nov., a replacement name for D. bella (L. E. Newton) Byng"]}

Holophris melinh Nguyen & Wi&sacute;niowski, sp. nov. (Figs 5–10) Material examined. Holotype, &female;, pinned, VIETNAM, Me Linh, Ngoc Thanh, Vinh Phuc, Malaise trap, 30.vi.2020, leg. IED-c. (IEBR). Paratype, &female;, Me Linh, Ngoc Thanh, Vinh Phuc, Malaise trap, 20.vi.2020, leg. IED-c. (IEBR). Diagnosis. Holophris melinh sp. nov. is most similar to H. marginella in general habitus and coloration of head and mesosoma. It can be separated from the latter by presence of two rows of punctures on anterior margin of pronotum (versus one row in H. marginella), and metallic blue and violet reflection on metasomal terga (versus almost black in H. marginella). It is also similar to H. thailandica Rosa, Wei, Notton & Xu, 2016 in general habitus, presence of two rows of punctures on anterior margin of pronotum, as well as wrinkled mesoscutellum but can be differentiated by gena almost without wrinkles (versus gena with wrinkles in H. thailandica), and by shape of forewing stigma which length (at dorsal margin) is less than twice of its maximum width (versus more than twice longer as its maximum width in H. thailandica), and metanotum almost black (versus metanotum golden to red in H. thailandica). Description. Female (Fig. 10). Holotype. Body length 2.7 mm. Forewing length 1.8 mm. Paratype. Body length 2.3 mm. Forewing length 1.5 mm. Head. In frontal view, dorsal profile extremely convex (Fig. 5). Head from scapal basin to occipital area with small, shallow and spaced punctures, with intervals transversally and deeply wrinkled forming continuous striae between punctures. Scapal basin deep and polished. In lateral view, longest distance between genal carina and ventral margin of eye 0.76 × MOD; genal carina bisecting MS, its end near lower margin of compound eye. Ocellar triangle isosceles, mid ocellus close to postocellar line. Postocellar line medially absent. OOL = 1.44 × MOD; POL = 2.23 × MOD; MS = 1.3–1.45 × MOD; relative length of P:F1:F2:F3 = 1:0.65:0.5:0.5. Gena smooth, almost without wrinkles. Occipital area and ocellar area smooth and impunctate, with sparse tiny punctures. Mesosoma. Pronotum impunctate, with sparse tiny punctures; with two rows of large and deep punctures on anterior margin, almost unite medially (Fig. 6), and large, dense punctures antero-laterally, propodeal corner with corrugated intervals (Fig. 8). Mesoscutum impunctate, with sparse tiny punctures (Figs 6, 7); notaular pits narrow and long (0.8 × MOD), notauli indistinct (Fig. 7); mesoscutum laterally with row of large and elongated punctures close to tegula margin. Mesoscutellum with four foveae on anterior margin, with two median foveae large (1.7 × MOD) and two lateral ones smaller (1.3 × MOD). Mesoscutellum longitudinally wrinkled, with large oval punctures in between wrinkled laterally, small puncture medially (Fig. 7). Metanotum distinctly elongated, with deep, round and large punctures and subequal intervals, with smooth intervals bearing some tiny punctures. Mesopleuron with large and round punctures, with narrow interspaces (0.2–0.5 × PD), with elongated sub-transverse striae from subalar fovea to posterior margin (Fig. 8). Tarsal claw with three teeth. Metasoma. T1–T3 almost impunctate, with very sparse and tiny punctures. T1 without semitransparent rim. T2 and T3 with wide brownish semitransparent rim (1.5–2.5 × MOD). Apex of T3 without median notch (Fig. 9). Colouration. Face metallic green to blue; ocellar area, gena and occipital area blue. Pronotum metallic blue to green, mesoscutum black medially and blue laterally (almost black in paratype), mesoscutellum metallic golden-red or bronze, metanotum almost black (Fig. 7), mesopleuron metallic green or bronze (Fig. 8). Antenna black, with scape metallic blue or green. Tegula brown, without metallic reflection. Legs metallic bluish green, with tarsi testaceous and without metallic reflection. Metasoma black, with metallic blue or violet, with brown semitransparent rim on posterior margins of T2 and T3 (Fig. 9). Male. Unknown. Distribution. Vietnam (northern part). Etymology. The specific name refers to the name of the Me Linh biodiversity station in Vinh Phuc province, where the species was collected; it is to be treated as a noun in apposition., Published as part of Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong & Wiśniowski, Bogdan, 2021, Review of Holophris Mocsáry (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Vietnam, with description of a new species, pp. 393-399 in Zootaxa 4963 (2) on page 396, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/4700778, {"references":["Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S., Notton, D. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016) Revision of the Oriental genus Holophris Mocsary, 1890 and description of the genus Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4083 (2), 201 - 220. http: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4083.2.2"]}

Holophris marginella (Mocsáry, 1890) Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus Mocsáry, 1890: 51. Holotype &female;: Sumatra (ETHZ?) Mocsáry1913: 287; Rosa & Greeff 2021: 198. Ellampus marginellus Mocsáry: Dalla Torre 1892: 13. Holophris marginellus (Mocsáry): Ashmead 1902: 229; Bischoff 1913: 11; du Buysson 1901: 99; Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 225. Omalus (Holophris) marginellus (Mocsáry): Linsenmaier 1959: 20. Omalus marginellus (Mocsáry): Baltazar 1966: 188. Holophris marginella (Mocsáry): Rosa et al. 2016: 205. Material examined. No specimens are available in this study. Distribution. China (Yunnan, Hainan), Malaysia, Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam (Kimsey & Bohart 1991, Rosa et al. (2016)., Published as part of Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong & Wiśniowski, Bogdan, 2021, Review of Holophris Mocsáry (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Vietnam, with description of a new species, pp. 393-399 in Zootaxa 4963 (2) on page 394, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/4700778, {"references":["Mocsary, A. (1890) Additamentum primum ad monographiam Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Termeiszetrajzi Fu ¨ zetek, 13 (2 - 3), 45 - 66.","Mocsary, A. (1913) Species Chrysididarum novae. IV. Annales Historico-Naturales Musei Nationalis Hungarici, 11 (1), 1 - 45. Panzer, G. W. F. (1801) Faunae Insectorum Germaniae initia oder Deutschlands Insecten. Hf. 80 - 85 (1801). Neuaufl. Manz, Nu ¨ rnberg, 56 pp.","Rosa, P. & Greeff, M. (2021) The types of Chrysididae (Insecta, Hymenoptera) deposited at the Institute of Entomology of the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology. Zootaxa, 4908 (2), 181 - 204. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4908.2.2","Dalla Torre, C. G. de (1892) Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Volumen VI: Chrysididae (Tubulifera). Guilelmi Engelmann, Lipsiae, viii + 118 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 8794","Ashmead, W. H. (1902) Classification of the fossorial, predaceous and parasitic wasps, or the superfamily Vespoidea. The Canadian Entomologist, 34, 219 - 231. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 34219 - 9","Bischoff, H. (1913) Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman, P. (Ed.), Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. Bruxelles, L. Desmet-Verteneuil, pp. 1 - 86 + 5 pls.","du Buysson, R. (1901) Sur quelques Chrysidides du Musee de Vienne. Annalen des k. k. naturhistorischen Hofmuseums, 16, 97 - 104.","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [\" 1990 \"]) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp. Linsenmaier, W. (1959) Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Beru ¨ cksichtigung der europa ¨ ischen Spezies. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32 (1), 1 - 232.","Baltazar, C. R. (1966) A catalogue of Philippine Hymenoptera. Pacific Insects Monograph, 8, 1 - 488.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S., Notton, D. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016) Revision of the Oriental genus Holophris Mocsary, 1890 and description of the genus Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4083 (2), 201 - 220. http: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4083.2.2"]}

Genus Holophris Mocsáry, 1890 Holophris Mocsáry, 1890: 51 (as subgenus of Elampus Spinola, 1806). Type species: Ellampus (Holophris) marginellus Mocsáry, 1890, by monotypy. Holophris Mocsáry: Ashmead 1902: 229; Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 222 (part.); Strumia 1995: 53; Rosa 2005: 8; Madl & Rosa 2012: 103 (part.). Omalus (Holophris) Panzer, 1801: Linsenmaier 1959: 14 (part.). Diagnosis. According to Rosa et al. (2016), Holophris Mocsáryis closely related to Omalus Panzer, 1801, Philoctetes, Pseudomalus Ashmead, 1902, and Leptopareia, but it can be differentiated from the latter four genera by the following characters: transpleural carina extending below propodeal angle; head, in frontal view, with distinct convex upper profile, in lateral view, with distinct subgenal area; double omaulus triangularly shaped. Remarks. The feminine gender of the genus name was indicated by Rosa et al. 2016; previous authors supposed it was masculine., Published as part of Nguyen, Lien Thi Phuong & Wiśniowski, Bogdan, 2021, Review of Holophris Mocsáry (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae) from Vietnam, with description of a new species, pp. 393-399 in Zootaxa 4963 (2) on page 394, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4963.2.10, http://zenodo.org/record/4700778, {"references":["Mocsary, A. (1890) Additamentum primum ad monographiam Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Termeiszetrajzi Fu ¨ zetek, 13 (2 - 3), 45 - 66.","Spinola, M. (1806) Insectorum Liguriae species novae aut rariores quas in agro Ligustico nuper detexit, descripsit et iconibus illustravit Maximilianus Spinola, adjecto catalogo specierum auctoribus jam enumeratarum, quae in eadem regione passim occurrunt. Vol. 1. Gravier Yves, Genuae, xvii + 160 + 2 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 65985","Ashmead, W. H. (1902) Classification of the fossorial, predaceous and parasitic wasps, or the superfamily Vespoidea. The Canadian Entomologist, 34, 219 - 231. https: // doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 34219 - 9","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [\" 1990 \"]) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp. Linsenmaier, W. (1959) Revision der Familie Chrysididae (Hymenoptera) mit besonderer Beru ¨ cksichtigung der europa ¨ ischen Spezies. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Entomologischen Gesellschaft, 32 (1), 1 - 232.","Strumia, F. (1995) Holophris mochianus spec. nov. from Africa (Hymenoptera Chrysididae). Bollettino della Societa Entomologica Italiana, 127 (1), 53 - 5.","Rosa, P. (2005) La collezione di Crisidi (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae) del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Milano. Natura, 94 (2), 1 - 128.","Madl, M. & Rosa, P. (2012) A Catalogue of the Chrysididae (Hymenoptera: Chrysidoidea) of the Ethiopian Region excluding Malagasy Subregion. Linzer Biologische Beitrage, 44 (1), 5 - 169.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S., Notton, D. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016) Revision of the Oriental genus Holophris Mocsary, 1890 and description of the genus Leptopareia Rosa & Xu, gen. nov. (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Zootaxa, 4083 (2), 201 - 220. http: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4083.2.2"]}

Chrysura kashmirensis (Nurse, 1902) (Figs 70 A–70F) Chrysis kashmirensis Nurse, 1902: 305. Lectotype &female; designated by Bohart in Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 491; Kashmir (BMNH) (examined). Chrysis kashmirensis: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 491 (cat., Pakistan: Kashmir). Material examined. 1 &female;, Syntype, Kashmire, 5–6000 ft, 5.01, Type, Chrysis kashmirensis (Nurse), Col. C.G. Nurse Collection 1920-72, B.M. Type 13.67, BMNH(E) #970975 (NHMUK); 1 &female;, same labels (HNHM). Distribution. Kashmir. Genus Istiochrysis Rosa & Xu in Rosa et al., 2016c Istiochrysis Rosa & Xu in Rosa et al. 2016c: 592. Type species: Istiochrysis ziliolii Rosa et al. 2016c. Original designation., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan, 2021, An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4929 (1) on page 71, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4544556, {"references":["Nurse, G. C. (1902) New species of Indian Chrysididae. The Entomologist, 35, 304 - 308.","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [' ' 1990 '']) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016 c) Istiochrysis gen. nov., a new chrysidid genus from Oriental China (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae, Chrysidini). Zootaxa, 4111 (5), 591 - 597. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4111.5.5"]}

Chrysis dissimilis Dahlbom, 1854 (Figs 34 A–34D) Chrysis dissimilis Dahlbom, 1854: 202. Holotype &female;; India: Bengal (ZMUC) (examined). Dalla Torre 1892: 57 (cat.); Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 404 (cat., India: Bengal, elegans group); Rosa et al. 2017e: 81 (typ., fig. 10). Chrysis (Tetrachrysis) dissimilis: Mocsáry 1889: 376 (descr., India Orientalis: Bengal); Bischoff 1913: 50 (cat., India). Material examined. 1 &female;, C. dissimilis Dahlb. Bengal, May 1808, Mus. Westerm. ZMUC 00240117 (ZMUC). Distribution. India (Bengal (locality not specified))., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan, 2021, An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4929 (1) on page 39, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4544556, {"references":["Dahlbom, A. G. (1854) Hymenoptera Europaea praecipue borealia, formis typicis nonnullis specierum generumve exoticorum propter nexum systematicum associatis, per familias, genera, species et varietates disposita atque descripta. Tomus secundus. Chrysis in sensu Linnaeano. Friedrich Nicolai, Berolini [Berlin], xxiv + 412 pp., 12 pls. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 15890","Dalla Torre, C. G. de (1892) Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. VI. Chrysididae (Tubulifera). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig [Lipsia], viii + 118 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10348","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [' ' 1990 '']) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S. & Xu, Z. - F. (2017 e) One new species and three new records of Chrysis Linnaeus from China (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). ZooKeys, 669, 65 - 88. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / zookeys. 669.12398","Mocsary, A. (1889) Monographia Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Hungarian Academy of Science, Typis Societatis Franklinianae, Budapest, 643 pp.","Bischoff, H. (1913) Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman, P. (Ed.), Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. L. Desmet- Verteneuil, Bruxelles, pp. 1 - 86, 5 pls."]}

Trichrysis lusca (Fabricius, 1804) (Figs 82 A–82D) Chrysis lusca Fabricius, 1804: 171. Holotype &female;; Italy (accidentally introduced) (ZMUC) (examined). du Buysson 1896: 475 (key), 476 (Central provinces; Chhattisgarh: Raipur; Karnataka: Bangalore [= Bengaluru], Rajabrampoor, Mysore; Tamil Nadu: Pondicherry); Dalla Torre 1892: 76 (cat., India); du Buysson 1898b: 76 (Hindoustan [= India]: North Konkan); du Buysson 1900: 153 (Balasore [= Baleshwar]); Bingham 1903: 439 (key), 484 (descr., throughout India); Bingham 1908: 349 (West Bengal: Murshidabad, it occurs throughout India); Jonathan et al. 1977: 87 (India: Arunachal Pradesh); Thakkar & Parikh 2018: 22 (cat., Gujarat). Chrysis (Pentachrysis) lusca: Mocsáry 1889: 527–528 (descr., India orientalis, Rajarampore, Neelgherries, Tamil Nadu: Pondicherry, Tranquebar [= Tharangambadi]); Bischoff 1913: 62 (cat., India). Praestochrysis lusca: Kimsey & Bohart 1991: 533 (cat., India). Chrysis bengalensis Mocsáry, 1889: 527. Holotype &female;; India Orientalis, Maharashtra: Bombay (HNHM). Dalla Torre 1892: 47 (cat., India); Bingham 1903: 439 (key), 482–483 (descr., Maharashtra: Bombay, Madras [= Chennai]); Bingham 1908: 349 (Bihar: Purneah [= Purnia]. Chrysis (Pentachrysis) bengalensis: Bischoff 1913: 62 (cat., India). Trichrysis lusca: Suresh et al. 1999: 2 (Kerala: Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary) (tab.1); Mathew 2004: 219 (cat., Kerala). Material examined. 1 &female;, Bombay leg. Stockinger, 755-1, Bengalensis Mocs. typ. det. Mocsáry Chrysis lusca F. Linsenmaier det. 62, Holotypus Chrysis bengalensis &female; Mocs. RMB, id nr. 135510 HNHM Hym.coll. (HNHM); 2 &female;, Karikal, Malabar, without further data (NHMW); 1 &female;, Kerala, Thenmala, v.1985, leg. Nathan (PRC); 12 &female;, Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore, without further data (NHMW); 1 &female;, Tamil Nadu, Coimbatore, viii.1932, leg. Nathan (MNLU); 1 &female;, Tamil Nadu, Kurumbagaram, 22.ix.1951, leg. S. Nathan (MNLU); 3 &female;, idem, ix.1951 (MNLU); 1 &female;, Tamil Nadu, Settipatti, 13.vi.1975, leg. W. Perraudin (MNLU); 1 &female;, idem, 16.vi.1975 (MNLU); 1 &female;, idem, 3.vii.1976 (MNLU); 3 &female;, idem, xi.1979 (MNLU); 1 &female;, Tamil Nadu, Omalur, Salem, Settipatti, 14.x.1975, leg. W. Perraudin (MNLU); 1 &female;, idem, 5.xi.1975 (MNLU); 1 &female;, idem, 29.xi.1975 (MNLU); 4 &female;, idem, iii.1978 (MNLU). Distribution. India (Bihar; Chhattisgarh; Karnataka; Kerala; Maharashtra; Odisha; Puducherry, Tamil Nadu; West Bengal; Rajarampore; Nilgiris); China (Hubei, Hunan, Taiwan, Fujian, Guangdong, Macao, Hainan, Guizhou, Yunnan) (Rosa et al. 2016a); Australia, Japan, Korea, Madagascar, Myanmar, Philippines, Thailand (Kimsey & Bohart 1991); Bangladesh, Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar (Jonathan et al. 1977), Sri Lanka, Vietnam (Rosa et al. 2016a). Afrotropical: Mauritius and Réunion (Azevedo et al. 2010)., Published as part of Rosa, Paolo, Aswathi, Pokkattu Gopi & Bijoy, Chenthamarakshan, 2021, An annotated and illustrated checklist of the Indian cuckoo wasps (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae), pp. 1-100 in Zootaxa 4929 (1) on pages 81-82, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4929.1.1, http://zenodo.org/record/4544556, {"references":["Fabricius, J. C. (1804) Systema piezatorum secundum ordines, genera, species, adiectis synonymis, locis, observationibus, descriptionibus. Carolum Reichard, Brunsvigae [Brunswick], iii-xiv, 439 + 30 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 12548","Dalla Torre, C. G. de (1892) Catalogus hymenopterorum hucusque descriptorum systematicus et synonymicus. Vol. VI. Chrysididae (Tubulifera). Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig [Lipsia], viii + 118 pp. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. title. 10348","du Buysson, R. (1898 b [\" 1897 \"]) Etude des Chrysidides du Museum de Paris. Annales de la Societe Entomologique de France, 66, 518 - 580, pls. 1 - 2.","du Buysson, R. (1900) Contribution aux Chrysidides du Globe (4 e serie). Revue d'Entomologie, 19, 125 - 165.","Bingham, C. T. (1903) The Fauna of British India, including Ceylon and Burma. Hymenoptera. Vol. II. Ants and Cuckoo-wasps. Taylor & Francis, London, 528 pp.","Bingham, C. T. (1908) Notes on Aculeate Hymenoptera in the Indian Museum. Part I. Records of the Indian Museum, 2 (4 / 32), 347 - 349.","Jonathan, J. K., Roy, S. B. & Dhar, M. (1977) On a collection of cuckoo wasps from India and Bhutan (Hymenoptera: Chrysididae). Newsletter Zoological Survey of India, 32, 85 - 87.","Thakkar, B. & Parikh, P. (2018) An inventory on diversity and distribution pattern of Hymenopteran Insects in Gujarat, India. International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences, 6, 19 - 32. https: // doi. org / 10.26438 / ijsrbs / v 6 i 5.1925","Mocsary, A. (1889) Monographia Chrysididarum Orbis Terrarum Universi. Hungarian Academy of Science, Typis Societatis Franklinianae, Budapest, 643 pp.","Bischoff, H. (1913) Hymenoptera. Fam. Chrysididae. In: Wytsman, P. (Ed.), Genera insectorum. Fascicule 151. L. Desmet- Verteneuil, Bruxelles, pp. 1 - 86, 5 pls.","Kimsey, L. S. & Bohart, R. M. (1991 [' ' 1990 '']) The Chrysidid Wasps of the World. Oxford University Press, New York, 652 pp.","Suresh, P. V., Sudheendrakumar, V. V., Binoy, C. F., Mathew, G. & Narendran, T. C. (1999) The macro hymenopteran fauna of Parambikulam Wildlife Sanctuary. Zoos' Print, 24 (4), 1 - 2. https: // doi. org / 10.11609 / JoTT. ZPJ. 14.4.1 - 2","Mathew, G. (2004) Biodiversity documentation for Kerala. Part 7. Insects. Kerala Forest Research Institute Peechi, Thrissur, 281 pp.","Rosa, P., Wei, N. - S., Feng, J. & Xu, Z. - F. (2016 a) Revision of the genus Trichrysis Lichtenstein, 1876 from China, with description of three new species (Hymenoptera, Chrysididae). Deutsche Entomologische Zeitschrift, 63 (1), 109 - 136. https: // doi. org / 10.3897 / dez. 63.7347","Azevedo, C. O., Madl, M. & Olmi, M. (2010) A Catalogue of the Bethylidae, Chrysididae, Dryinidae, Embolemidae, Sclerogibbidae and Scolebythidae of the Malagasy Subregion (Hymenoptera, Chrysidoidea). Linzer Biologische Beitrage, 42 (2), 845 - 918."]}