Search

The aim of this study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentine, interfacial nanoleakage expression, and stability after ageing, of two-step vs. one-step self-etch adhesives. Human molars were cut to expose middle/deep dentine, assigned to groups (n = 15), and treated with the following bonding systems: (i) Optibond XTR (a two-step self-etch adhesive; Kerr), (ii) Clearfil SE Bond (a two-step self-etch adhesive; Kuraray), (iii) Adper Easy Bond (a one-step self-etch adhesive; 3M ESPE), and (iv) Bond Force (a one-step self-etch adhesive; Tokuyama). Specimens were processed for μTBS testing after 24 h, 6 months, or 1 yr of storage in artificial saliva at 37°C. Nanoleakage expression was examined in similarly processed additional specimens. At baseline the μTBS results ranked in the following order: Adper Easy Bond = Optibond XTR ≥Clearfil SE = Bond Force, and interfacial nanoleakage analysis showed Clearfil SE Bond = Adper Easy Bond = Optibond XTR> Bond Force. After 1 yr of storage, Optibond XTR, Clearfil SE Bond, and Adper Easy Bond showed higher μTBS and lower interfacial nanoleakage expression compared with Bond Force. In conclusion, immediate bond strength, nanoleakage expression, and stability over time were not related to the number of steps of the bonding systems, but to their chemical formulations.

Type of impaction and site of nerve are important risk factors of neurological damage following the lower third molar removal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the peripheral damage of lingual and lower alveolar nerves in relation to tooth angulation and radiographic proximity to the alveolar canal.Sixty-seven consecutive patients (41 women and 26 men, mean age 29.97+/-14.35 years) underwent lower wisdom teeth extraction and were clinically evaluated over a one year period, checking any evidence of peripheral damage of the lower alveolar or lingual nerves. Tooth angulation and presence or absence of spongy bone between the mandibular canal and the root apex were considered; so, the patients were assigned twice to two groups: G1A (third molar in axis); G2A (third molar angulated); G1B (third molar apex adjacent to the mandibular canal); G2B (spongy bone between root apex and canal). The extraction was carried out according to a standardised technique without raising and retracting of a lingual flap. The follow-up checks were at one week, 1, 3, 6, 12 months and until any problem was solved. Statistical analysis was carried out using chi2 test.A total of two cases of temporary damage to the lingual nerve (1 case in G1A and 1 in G2A; 2 cases in G2B) and 3 cases to the lower alveolar nerve (3 cases in G2A; 1 in G1B and 2 in G2B) were discovered. No statistical differences were found. Symptoms cleared up within a maximum period of 5 months.Tooth angulation and proximity to lower alveolar canal were not related to alveolar or lingual damage; the conservative surgical technique seems to be an important factor in preventing neurological complications.

Trismus may represent an external sign of masticatory or lateral pharyngeal abscess that in rare cases is the consequence of pathogen action by micro-organisms introduced in deep tissues after inferior alveolar block. The case presented shows a buccal-masseteric mycotic abscess following restorative procedure involving inferior alveolar anesthesia on the same side. A 49-year-old woman was referred to the Dental Clinic (University of Trieste) complaining of a progressive inability to open her mouth since one week associated to a hemifacial edema in the right parotid region. The symptoms initially started one week before. Infection developed after restorative procedures performed 10 days before on the same side. Based on clinical signs and cultural exam findings, a buccal-masseteric mycotic abscess was found and magnetic resonance (MR) was performed to assess its localization and extension. Initial pharmacological therapy with piperacillin/tazobactam administered intravenously, was replaced by appropriate antimycotic therapy on the basis of sensitivity test to antibiotics. Infection resolution was obtained but complete absence of facial asymmetry occurred after 5 months only. Introduction of micro-organisms during anesthetic alveolar block is a documented source of infection and may occur after dental procedure involving inferior alveolar anesthesia. Complete medical history, cultural exam with sensitivity test to antibiotics and RM or computed tomography (CT) images, are necessary to perform an adequate treatment plan and to administer a correct therapy. Presence of trismus, accompanied by pain or facial edema after dental procedure or during dental or perioral infections has to be carefully considered by clinician to diagnose as soon as possible a deep spaces infection and to avoid serious or life-threatening complications.