Search

To report the final results of a dose-escalation study of volumetric intensity-modulated arc stereotactic radiosurgery (VMAT-SRS) boost after three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy in patients with spine metastases.Oligometastatic cancer patients bearing up to five synchronous metastases (visceral or bone, including vertebral ones) and candidates for surgery or radiosurgery were considered for inclusion. 25 Gy was delivered in 10 daily fractions (2 weeks) to the metastatic lesion, affected vertebrae and adjacent ones (one cranial and one caudal vertebra). Sequentially, the dose to spinal metastases was progressively increased (8 Gy, 10 Gy, 12 Gy) in the patient cohorts. Dose-limiting toxicities were defined as any treatment-related non-hematologic acute adverse effects rated as grade ≥3 or any acute haematological toxicity rated as ≥ 4 by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale.Fifty-two lesions accounting for 40 consecutive patients (male/female: 29/11; median age: 71 years; range 40-85) were treated from April 2011 to September 2020. Most patients had a primary prostate (65.0%) or breast cancer (22.5%). Thirty-two patients received 8 Gy VMAT-SRS boost (total BEDA 12 Gy spine metastasis SRS boost following 25 Gy to the affected and adjacent vertebrae was feasible with an excellent local control rate and toxicity profile.

Cancer diagnoses expose patients to traumatic stress, sudden changes in daily life, changes in the body and autonomy, with even long-term consequences, and in some cases, to come to terms with the end-of-life. Furthermore, rising survival rates underline that the need for interventions for emotional wellbeing is in growing demand by patients and survivors. Cancer patients frequently have compliance problems, difficulties during treatment, stress, or challenges in implementing healthy behaviors. This scenario was highlighted during the COVID-19 emergency. These issues often do not reach the clinical attention of dedicated professionals and could also become a source of stress or burnout for professionals. So, these consequences are evident on individual, interpersonal, and health system levels. Oncology services have increasingly sought to provide value-based health care, considering resources invested, with implications for service delivery and related financing mechanisms. Value-based health care can improve patient outcomes, often revealed by patient outcome measures while seeking balance with economical budgets. The paper aims to show the Gemelli Advanced Radiation Therapy (ART) experience of personalizing the patients' care pathway through interventions based on technologies and art, the personalized approach to cancer patients and their role as “co-stars” in treatment care. The paper describes the vision, experiences, and evidence that have guided clinical choices involving patients and professionals in a co-constructed therapeutic pathway. We will explore this approach by describing: the various initiatives already implemented and prospects, with particular attention to the economic sustainability of the paths proposed to patients; the several pathways of personalized care, both from the patient's and healthcare professional perspective, that put the person's experience at the Gemelli ART Center. The patient's satisfaction with the treatment and economic outcomes have been considered. The experiences and future perspectives described in the manuscript will focus on the value of people's experiences and patient satisfaction indicators, patients, staff, and the healthcare organization.

IntroductionStereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a novel technique for the ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with contraindications to standard procedures, i.e., radiofrequency ablation.Case presentationWe report the case of a 73-year-old man with non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and recurrent VT episodes. Electroanatomic mapping showed VT prevalently of epicardial origin, but direct epicardial access through subxyphoid puncture could not be performed due to pleuropericardial adhesions from a past history of chemical pleurodesis. STAR was performed, with no VT recurrence at 6 months follow-up.ConclusionsPrevious experiences with STAR have demonstrated its importance in the management of patients with refractory VT in whom other ablation strategies were not successful. Our case report highlights the use of STAR as a second choice in a patient with an unfavorable VT anatomical location and technical limitations to an optimal radiofrequency ablation. Moreover, it confirms STAR's effectiveness in the ablation of complex transmural lesions, which are more often associated with non-ischemic structural heart disease.

Additional file 1. Confusion matrices of the predictive performances for the intercontinenental cohort.

Purpose: A concomitant boost (CB) in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery of invasive breast cancer (BC) has been suggested for treatment time reduction and therapy intensification. The aim of this analysis was to assess long-term tolerability of a CB in patients treated with postoperative intensity Modulated Accelerated RAdiotherapy (MARA). Patients and Methods: In this phase I–II trial, 321 patients with intermediate-high risk BC (pT1-4 with at least one of the following characteristics: pre or perimenopausal status, pN2-3, positive or close margins) were enrolled. Patients were treated with forward-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and CB. A total dose of 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) and 60 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) was prescribed to the whole breast and the tumor bed, respectively. The potential impact of hypertension, diabetes, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy on both skin and subcutaneous late toxicity-free survival (LTFS) was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: Median follow-up was 52 months (range: 3–115). Regional node irradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were prescribed to 29.3%, 65.4% and 81.0% of patients, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 skin LTFS were 95.6% and 100.0%, respec-tively. Five-year G2 and G3 subcutaneous LTFS were 80.0% and 98.6%, respectively. Only diabetes showed a significant correlation with worse G3 subcutaneous LTFS (p: 0.024). Five-year loco-regional control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 98.0%, 91.8%, 89.7% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion: IMRT combined with CB was associated with a low risk of > G2 late toxicities (0.0% and 1.4% for skin and subcutaneous tissue, respectively). The cumulative actuarial incidence of local recurrences was 2.0% despite the exclusion of low-risk patients. Our results suggest that CB is safe and effective in patients with intermediate-high risk BC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03471741.

Supplemental material, Supplementary_material_R1 for Magnetic resonance–guided radiotherapy feasibility in elderly cancer patients: proposal of the MASTER scoring system by Luca Boldrini, Giuseppe F. Colloca, Emanuele Villani, Giuditta Chiloiro, Andrea Bellieni, Stefania Manfrida, Francesco Cellini, Maria Antonietta Gambacorta and Vincenzo Valentini in Tumori Journal

To assess the safety and feasibility of computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation (CT-guided RFA) in unresectable lung neoplasms, using a new 15G monopolar internally cooled wet electrode.15 consecutive patients with lung neoplasms (4 cm), both primary and secondary, unsuitable for or refusing surgery, underwent percutaneous CT-guided RFA using a 15G electrode with a 3-cm exposed tip. The prevalence and grade of adverse events and technical success were evaluated, as well as the extension of the ablation zone, the complete response rates, and the time to progression, determined at CT examination performed 1, 6, and 12 months after the procedure.A total of 22 lung neoplasms were treated (mean diameter: 28 mm; range: 20-39 mm). Technical success was obtained in all patients, without major complications or intraprocedural deaths. Mild or moderate pneumothorax was registered in 46.7% of patients, while a perilesional hemorrhage was observed in 5/15 cases. During the follow-up period, a complete response was obtained in 19 out of 22 lesions (86.4%) with three partial response, two of them successfully retreated with the same technique.Percutaneous RFA using a 15G internally cooled wet electrode is a safe and feasible treatment for unresectable lung neoplasms, with high complete response rates.

Interventional oncology (IO) is an emergent field in interventional radiology that can be considered the fourth pillar of oncology. Interventional oncology has the unique capability to treat malignancy in a loco-regional fashion enabling curative (percutaneous ablation), disease stabilization (intra-arterial chemo/radioembolization), and palliative treatment (such as biliary drainage or nephrostomy). The whole arsenal of IO acts by inducing necrosis and apoptosis, with interactions with the tumour's microenvironment potentially crucial for oncological outcomes. Considering that tumour's microenvironment is a pivotal target for both immuno-oncology and interventional-oncology, the interactions between these two anti-tumour weapons must be investigated to understand their synergy. Interestingly, substantial efforts have been directed to understand which technique combinations are best for specific tumours. This review article summarizes the latest scientific evidence highlighting the future prospective of this winning combination, integrating evidence-reported literature and experience-based perceptions.

Description of data: IBMC criteria for assessing pain control. (DOCX 18 kb)

Description of data: Follow-up control schedule. (DOCX 20 kb)

Aim: To evaluate outcome of an accelerated radiotherapy (RT) regimen in elderly patients with an early stage non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC). Methods: Total RT dose was 30 Gy in 5 Gy fractions in six consecutive days. Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Fourteen were aged ≥80 years. Acute skin and observed late toxicity were exclusively of grade 1. Thirty patients showed a complete response (median follow-up 30 months). Two-year actuarial local control was 93.2%. The cosmetic result was mostly judged as good or excellent. Conclusions: Short-course RT in elderly NMSC patients produces >90% local control of disease.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the use of fluorescein angiography (FA) images in a convolutional neural network (CNN) in the management of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Methods The dataset involved a total of 835 FA images of 149 eyes (90 patients), where each eye was associated with a binary outcome (57 “untreated” eyes and 92 “treated”; 308 “untreated” images, 527 “treated”). The resolution of the images was 1600 and 1200 px in 20% of cases, whereas the remaining 80% had a resolution of 640 and 480 px. All the images were resized to 640 and 480 px before training and no other preprocessing was applied. A CNN with four convolutional layers was trained on 90% of the images (n = 752) randomly chosen. The accuracy of the prediction was assessed on the remaining 10% of images (n = 83). Keras version 2.2.0 for R with Tensorflow backend version 1.11.0 was used for the analysis. Results The validation accuracy after 100 epochs was 0.88, whereas training accuracy was 0.97. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) presented an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.91. Conclusions Our study showed, we believe for the first time, the applicability of artificial intelligence (CNN) technology in the ROP management driven by FA. Further studies are needed to exploit different fields of applications of this technology. Translational Relevance This algorithm is the basis for a system that could be applied to both ROP as well as experimental oxygen induced retinopathy.

The hypopharynx is the site with the worst prognosis among head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of hypopharyngeal SCCs to identify the major clinical predictive factors and to compare the different primary therapeutic modalities.The medical records of 123 consecutive patients diagnosed with primary resectable hypopharyngeal SCC were reviewed. The correlations of oncologic endpoints with tumor parameters and primary treatment were evaluated.The overall survival (OS) rate was 76% and the disease-specific survival (DSS) rate was 80% at 3 years in the entire group. Sex and T and N classifications significantly influenced survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Seventy-four percent of our patients underwent both surgery and radiotherapy (RT), and the temporal sequence of the 2 modalities did not affect prognosis.The primary treatment modality in patients with resectable hypopharyngeal SCC did not affect prognosis in univariate and multivariate analyses for any stage considered.

Aims and background The aim of the study was to analyze the dose to be administered with two-dimensional involved-field palliative radiotherapy in advanced pancreatic carcinoma with respect to current dose-volume constraints (QUANTEC). Methods and study design The following standard regimens were evaluated: 30 Gy at 3 Gy/fraction (regimen A), 36 Gy at 2.4 Gy/fraction (regimen B), 45 Gy at 1.8 Gy/fraction (regimen C), and 50 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction (regimen D). The following constraints were considered: spinal cord Dmax max mean mean 10/15 patients of constraints for kidneys and liver. Therefore, minor violations (Results In regimen A (30 Gy, 3 Gy/fraction), evaluated constraints were respected in all patients, regardless of the type of energy. In regimen B (36 Gy, 2.4 Gy/fraction), constraints were met in all patients undergoing irradiation with 6 and 15 MV photons. However, using the cobalt unit, kidney constraint was respected only in 5 of 15 patients. In regimens C and D (45 Gy, 1.8 Gy/fraction and 50 Gy, 2 Gy/fraction, respectively), the constraint for the kidney was respected only in 2–5 patients, depending on the energy used. Furthermore, using 50 Gy, the spinal cord constraint was not respected in 2–3 patients, depending on the beam used. Therefore, only the following treatments were considered acceptable: 1) 30 Gy, 3 Gy/fraction, regardless of the energy used; 2) 36 Gy, 2.4 Gy/fraction, only for treatments performed with linear accelerator (6–15 MV). Conclusions The clinical benefits of radiotherapy in pancreatic tumors should not be withheld from patients treated in centers only with two-dimensional technology. Prospective trials, particularly in developing countries, would be useful to evaluate the efficacy in this setting of involved-field two-dimensional treatments using the dose and fractionation defined in this analysis.

Background Cancer care is undergoing an important paradigm shift from a disease-focused management to a patient-centred approach, in which increasingly more attention is paid to psychosocial aspects, quality of life, patients' rights and empowerment and survivorship. In this context, multidisciplinary teams emerge as a practical necessity for optimal coordination among health professionals and clear communication with patients. The European Partnership for Action Against Cancer (EPAAC), an initiative launched by the European Commission in 2009, addressed the multidisciplinary care from a policy perspective in order to define the core elements that all tumour-based multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) should include. To that effect, a working group conference was held in January 2013 within the EPAAC Work Package 7 (on Healthcare) framework. Methods The consensus group consisted of high-level representatives from the following European scientific societies, patient associations and stakeholders: European CanCer Organisation (ECCO), European SocieTy for Radiology & Oncology (ESTRO), European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European Society of Surgical Oncology (ESSO), International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG), European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC), European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS), International Psycho-Oncology Society (IPOS),European Cancer Patient Coalition (ECPC), EuropaColon, Europa Donna - The European Breast Cancer Coalition, Association of European Cancer Leagues (ECL), Organisation of European Cancer Institutes (OECI), EUSOMA - European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists, European Hospital and Healthcare Federation (HOPE) and EPAAC Work Packages 5 (Health promotion and prevention), 7, 8 (Research), 9 (Information systems) and 10 (Cancer plans). A background document with a list of 26 core issues drawn from a systematic review of the literature was used to guide the discussion. Five areas related to MDTs were covered: care objectives, organisation, clinical assessment, patients' rights and empowerment and policy support. Preliminary drafts of the document were widely circulated for consultation and amendments by the working group before final approval. Results The working group unanimously formulated a Policy Statement on Multidisciplinary Cancer Care to define the core elements that should be implemented by all tumour-based MDTs. This document identifies MDTs as the core component in cancer care organisation and sets down the key elements to guide changes across all European health systems. Conclusion MDTs are an essential instrument of effective cancer care policy, and their continued development crucial to providing patients the care they need and deserve. While implementation must remain in local hands, European health systems can still benefit from having a basis for an effective multidisciplinary model of cooperation. This policy statement is intended to serve as a reference for policymakers and healthcare providers who wish to improve the services currently provided to the cancer patients whose lives and well-being depend on their action.

Background Spermatic cord sarcomas are rare. The therapeutic approach is based only on case reports and small series. The standard treatment is radical orchiectomy with wide local resection, while the role of adjuvant therapies is not clear. We present a case of fibrosarcoma of the spermatic cord treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. A review of the literature about the role of adjuvant treatments is also discussed. Case Report A 59-year-old man presented a right testicular mass of about 4 × 3 cm in size. Biopsy showed a high-grade polymorphous sarcoma, consistent with a diagnosis of poorly differentiated fibromyosarcoma. He underwent a right radical inguinal orchiectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy (total dose: 5940 cGy). During treatment the patient developed a G3 skin toxicity (RTOG score) in the inguinal fold. After a follow-up of 57 months, he is alive and without evidence of local or distant recurrence. No late toxicity was noted. Conclusion The optimal adjuvant management of spermatic cord sarcoma is still uncertain. Looking at the literature, it seems that adjuvant radiotherapy can improve locoregional control and disease-free survival without additional late toxicity.

The use of raltitrexed ('Tomudex') as concomitant chemotherapy during preoperative radiotherapy in chemonaïve patients with stage II/III rectal cancer has been examined in this study and its recommended dose in conjunction with radiotherapy investigated. Forty-five Gray (Gy) of radiotherapy (1.8 Gy daily, 5 days per week) was delivered to the posterior pelvis, followed by a 5.4 Gy boost. Single doses of raltitrexed (2.0, 2.5 and 3.0 mg/m(2)) were administered on days 1, 19 and 38. Only 1 of the 15 patients entered experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 leucopenia) at the 3.0 mg/m(2) dose level. The overall response rate was 80% (five complete responses, seven partial responses). These preliminary data suggest that raltitrexed is a well tolerated and effective treatment when combined with preoperative radiotherapy in patients with stage II/III rectal cancer. The recommended dose of raltitrexed for future phase II studies will be 3.0 mg/m(2).

The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathological response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative concurrent two-drug chemotherapy and intensified radiation therapy (RT) with concomitant boost. AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the pathological response of locally advanced rectal cancer after preoperative concurrent two-drug chemotherapy and intensified radiation therapy (RT) with concomitant boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with T4 tumor or local recurrence were included. A trial based on two-stage Simon's design was planned. RT was performed with 3D-conformal technique. The dose to the mesorectum and pelvic lymph nodes was 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). A concomitant boost was delivered to Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) 2 cm margin to a total dose of 55 Gy (2.2 Gy/fraction). The following concurrent chemotherapy was administered: Raltitrexed (3 mg/m(2)) and oxaliplatin (130 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 17, and 35 of RT. Pathological response was evaluated according to the Mandard classification. Toxicities were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 scale. RESULTS: Eighteen patients (median age=64.5 years) were enrolled. The median follow-up was 22 months (range=2-36 months). After chemoradiation treatment, 16 patients underwent surgical resection (seven anterior resections and nine abdominal-perineal amputation); two patients did not undergo surgery due to early metastatic progression or refusal. R0 resection was achieved in all patients who underwent surgery. Five patients had pathological complete response [27.7%; 95% confidence interval (CI)=9.7-53.5%] and two patients showed only microscopic residual disease (11.1%; 95% CI=0.1-34.7%). Mandard grades 1 and 2 were detected in seven patients (38.9%; 95% CI=17.3-64.3%). Acute grade 3 or more toxicity was found in eight patients (44.4%; 95% CI=21.5-69.2%): one leucopenia-neutropenia, one liver, one skin and five cases of gastrointestinal toxicities. No patient had local tumor recurrence. One-, 2- and 3-year cumulative disease-free survival were 93.8%. One-, 2- and 3-year cumulative overall survival were 92.3%. CONCLUSION: Concurrent chemoradiation with concomitant boost in patients with advanced rectal cancer allows complete or near-complete pathological response in more than 38% of patients. However, severe acute toxicity was reported in more than one-third of patients.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Table 4. Statistical analysis study parameters and subgroup analyses.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Table 5. Overview of the translational research samples.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 3. Schematic overview of the study and timeline.

Additional file 4: Supplementary Table 4. Statistical analysis study parameters and subgroup analyses.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2. The informed consent form used for ImmunoSABR phase 2 trial.

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. In- and exclusion criteria.

Additional file 5: Supplementary Table 5. Overview of the translational research samples.

Additional file 3: Supplementary Table 3. Schematic overview of the study and timeline.

Additional file 2: Supplementary Table 2. The informed consent form used for ImmunoSABR phase 2 trial.

Additional file 1: Supplementary Table 1. In- and exclusion criteria.

Due to the high soft tissue resolution, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could improve the accuracy of pancreatic tumor delineation in radiation treatment planning. A multi-institutional study was proposed to evaluate the impact of MRI on inter-observer agreement in gross tumor volume (GTV) and duodenum delineation for pancreatic cancer compared with computer tomography (CT).Two clinical cases of borderline resectable (Case 1) and unresectable (Case 2) pancreatic cancer were selected. In two sequential steps, diagnostic contrast-enhanced CT scan and MRI sequences were sent to the participating centers. CT-GTVs were contoured while blinded to MRI data sets. DICE index was used to evaluate the spatial overlap accuracy.Thirty-one radiation oncologists from different Institutions submitted the delineated volumes. CT- and MRI-GTV mean volumes were 21.6 ± 9.0 cmDiagnostic MRI resulted in smaller GTV in borderline resectable case with a substantial agreement between observers, and was comparable to CT scan in interobserver variability, in both cases. The greater variability in the unresectable case underlines the critical issues related to the outlining when vascular structures are more involved. The integration of MRI with contrast-enhancement CT, thanks to its high definition of tumor relationship with neighboring vessels, could offer a greater accuracy of target delineation.

Background/aim To evaluate the outcome of patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CC) treated with external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CT) with or without intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) boost or with definitive ILBT. Patients and methods A pooled analysis of patients with non-metastatic unresectable CC was performed. They were treated in three different institution with EBRT plus CT with or without an ILBT boost. Some patients received only ILBT with curative dose. Results Seventy-three patients were included in the analysis. Thirty-nine patients (53%) received EBRT treatment with ILBT boost (18 patients with CT during EBRT), while 28 patients (38%) were treated with EBRT (CT in 26 patients) and 6 patients (8.2%) with definitive ILBT (2 patients with CT). CT was administered including either the use of gemcitabine or 5-fluorouracil. With a median follow-up of 16 month (range=1-94 months), median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. Overall median LC was 16 months and patients who underwent ILBT had a better local control (LC) (p=0.018). Conclusion The role of ILBT in unresectable CC is not yet supported by robust evidence in the literature. However, within this limit, preliminary results seem to suggest an improved local control in patients treated with ILBT, almost comparable to the ones of standard chemo-radiotherapy (CRT).

This article discusses the current use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques in clinical practice and reviews the available data from clinical outcome studies in different clinical settings. An overview of available literature about clinical outcomes with VMAT stereotactic/radiosurgical treatment is also reported. Materials and methods: All published manuscripts reporting the use of VMAT in a clinical setting from 2009 to November 2016 were identified. The search was carried out in December 2016 using the National Library of Medicine (PubMed/Medline). The following words were searched: “volumetric arc therapy”[All Fields] OR “vmat”[All Fields] OR “rapidarc”[All Fields], AND “radiotherapy”[All Fields] AND “Clinical Trial”[All Fields]. Results: Overall, 37 studies (21 prospective and 16 retrospective) fulfilling inclusion criteria and thus included in the review evaluated 2,029 patients treated with VMAT; of these patients, ~30.8% had genitourinary (GU) tumors (81% prostate, 19% endometrial), 26.2% head-and-neck cancer (H&NC), 13.9% oligometastases, 11.2% had anorectal cancer, 10.6% thoracic neoplasms (81% breast, 19% lung), and 7.0% brain metastases (BMs). Six different clinical scenarios for VMAT use were identified: 1) BMs, 2) H&NC, 3) thoracic neoplasms, 4) GU cancer, 5) anorectal tumor, and 6) stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) performed by VMAT technique in the oligometastatic patient setting. Conclusion: The literature addressing the clinical appropriateness of VMAT is scarce. Current literature suggests that VMAT, especially when used as simultaneous integrated boost or SBRT strategy, is an effective safe modality for all cancer types.

Purpose To investigate the maximum tolerated dose of intensity modulated radiation therapy simultaneous integrated boost whole-brain radiation therapy for palliative treatment of patients with

Purpose: The objective of this study is finding an intensity based histogram (IBH) signature to predict pathologic complete response (pCR) probability using only pre-treatment magnetic resonance (MR) and validate it externally in order to create a workflow for the external validation of an MR IBH signature and to apply the model out of the environment where it has been tuned. The impact of pCR and the final predictors on the survival outcome were also evaluated. Methods and Materials: Three centers using different MR scanners were involved in this retrospective study. The first center recruited 162 patients for model training, and the second and third centers provided 34 plus 25 patients for external validation. Patients provided written consent. Accrual period was from May 2008 to December 2014. After surgery pathologic response was defined. T2-weighted MR scans acquired before chemoradiation therapy (CRT) were used for analysis addressed on primary lesions. Images were pre-processed using Laplacian of Gaussian (LoG) filter with multiple σ, and first order intensity histogram-based features (kurtosis, skewness, and entropy) were extracted. Features selection was performed using Mann-Whitney test. Tumor staging (cT, cN) was added to build a logistic regression model and predict pCR. Model performance was evaluated with internal and external validation using area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) and calibration with Hosmer-Lemeshow test. The linear cross-correlation matrix (Pearson's coefficient) and the variance inflation factor (VIF) were used to check the correlation and the co-linearity among the final predictors. The amount of the information added through the radiomics features was estimated by using the DeLong's test, and the impact of pCR and the final predictors on survival outcomes were evaluated through the Kaplan-Meier curves by using the log-rank test and the multivariate Cox model. Results: Candidate-to-analysis features were skewness (σ = 0.485, P value =.01) and entropy (σ = 0.344, P value

We explored the Pareto fronts mathematical strategy to determine the optimal block margin and prescription isodose for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatments of liver metastases using the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. Three targets (planning target volumes [PTVs] = 20, 55, and 101 cc) were selected. A single fraction dose of 26 Gy was prescribed (prescription dose [PD]). VMAT plans were generated for 3 different beam energies. Pareto fronts based on (1) different multileaf collimator (MLC) block margin around PTV and (2) different prescription isodose lines (IDL) were produced. For each block margin, the greatest IDL fulfilling the criteria (95% of PTV reached 100%) was considered as providing the optimal clinical plan for PTV coverage. Liver Dmean, V7Gy, and V12Gy were used against the PTV coverage to generate the fronts. Gradient indexes (GI and mGI), homogeneity index (HI), and healthy liver irradiation in terms of Dmean, V7Gy, and V12Gy were calculated to compare different plans. In addition, each target was also optimized with a full-inverse planning engine to obtain a direct comparison with anatomy-based treatment planning system (TPS) results. About 900 plans were calculated to generate the fronts. GI and mGI show a U-shaped behavior as a function of beam margin with minimal values obtained with a +1 mm MLC margin. For these plans, the IDL ranges from 74% to 86%. GI and mGI show also a V-shaped behavior with respect to HI index, with minimum values at 1 mm for all metrics, independent of tumor dimensions and beam energy. Full-inversed optimized plans reported worse results with respect to Pareto plans. In conclusion, Pareto fronts provide a rigorous strategy to choose clinical optimal plans in SBRT treatments. We show that a 1-mm MLC block margin provides the best results with regard to healthy liver tissue irradiation and steepness of dose fallout.

Objective: A multiarm Phase I clinical trial was performed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) delivered by non-coplanar conformal beams or volumetric modulated arc therapy technique in seven predefined clinical settings. Methods: The (a) and (b) arms investigated primary and metastatic lung cancer differentiated by site of onset, arm (c) included primary or metastatic lesions outside the thorax, the (d) and (e) arms were for in-field reirradiation of recurrence, and finally, the (f) and (g) arms were for boost irradiation to the lesions after an adjuvant RT prescribed dose. A 4 months cut-off after previous irradiation course was fixed to distinguish the boost from the retreatment (4 months, respectively). Patients were prospectively enrolled in study arms according to tumor site, clinical stage and previous treatment. The total dose prescribed to the isocenter, ranged from 20 to 50 Gy according to the protocol design and the doses per fraction ranged from 4 to 10 Gy in 5 days. results: A total of 281 patients (M/F: 167/114; median age: 69 years) with 376 lesions underwent SBRT. No acute toxicity was reported in 175 patients (62.3%) while 106 (37.7%) experienced only low-grade (G < 2) acute toxicity. Four patients (all previously irradiated in the same site) showed >Grade 2 toxicity within 6 months from SBRT. With a median follow-up of 19 months, 204 patients (72.6%) did not experience late toxicity, and 77 (27.4%) experienced low grade late toxicity. On per-lesion basis, the 12-and 24 months actuarial local control inside the SBRT field were 84.3 and 73.7 %, respectively. conclusions: SBRT delivered in five consecutive fractions up to the doses evaluated is well tolerated. The MTD was reached in four (a, b, c and f) of the seven study arms. Recruitment for (d), (e) and (g) arms is still ongoing. advances in knowledge: In a prospective dose-escalation trial, the MTD of 50 Gy/10 Gy fraction and 35 Gy/7 Gy fraction were defined for primary and metastatic lesions and as boost after prior RT dose ≤50 Gy, respectively.