Search

Aim To study clinical features of myoendocarditis and its possible mechanisms, including persistence of SARS-Cov-2 in the myocardium, in the long-term period following COVID-19.Material and methods This cohort, prospective study included 15 patients aged 47.8±13.4 years (8 men) with post-COVID myocarditis. The COVID-19 diagnosis was confirmed for all patients. Median time to seeking medical care after COVID-19 was 4 [3; 7] months. The diagnosis of myocarditis was confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the heart (n=10) and by endomyocardial biopsy of the right ventricle (n=6). The virus was detected in the myocardium with PCR; immunohistochemical (IHC) study with antibody to SARS-Cov-2 was performed; anticardiac antibody level was measured; and echocardiography and Holter monitoring were performed. Hemodynamically significant coronary atherosclerosis was excluded for all patients older than 40 years.Results All patients showed a clear connection between the emergence or exacerbation of cardiac symptoms and COVID-19. 11 patients did not have any signs of heart disease before COVID-19; 4 patients had previously had moderate arrhythmia or heart failure (HF) without myocarditis. Symptoms of myocarditis emerged at 1–5 months following COVID-19. MRI revealed typical late gadolinium accumulation, signs of hyperemia, and one case of edema. The level of anticardiac antibodies was increased 3-4 times in 73 % больных. Two major clinical variants of post-COVID myocarditis were observed. 1. Arrhythmic (n=6), with newly developed extrasystole or atrial fibrillation without systolic dysfunction. 2. Decompensated variant with systolic dysfunction and biventricular HF (n=9). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 34.1±7.8 %, and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 5.8±0.7 cm. In one case, myocarditis was associated with signs of IgG4‑negative aortitis. SARS-Cov-2 RNA was found in 5 of 6 biopsy samples of the myocardium. The longest duration of SARS-Cov-2 persistence in the myocardium was 9 months following COVID-19. By using antibody to the Spike antigen and nucleocapsid, SARS-Cov-2 was detected in cardiomyocytes, endothelium, and macrophages. Five patients were diagnosed with lymphocytic myocarditis; one with giant-cell myocarditis; three patients had signs of endocarditis (infectious, lymphocytic with mural thrombosis).Conclusion Subacute/chronic post-COVID myocarditis with isolated arrhythmias or systolic dysfunction is characterized by long-term (up to 9 months) persistence of SARS-Cov-2 in the myocardium in combination with a high immune activity. Endocarditis can manifest either as infectious or as nonbacterial thromboendocarditis. A possibility of using corticosteroids and anticoagulants in the treatment of post-COVID myoendocarditis should be studied.

Cardiogenic shock is the leading cause of death among patients with acute coronary syndrome. This pathology is characterized by high rates of inhospital and annual mortality. In Russian literature, data on the prevalence, diagnosis and treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock are limited. Therefore, the main aim of this publication is to increase the awareness of specialists about modern approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of this condition. This review discusses in detail the main causes of cardiogenic shock, aspects of pathophysiology, modern classification, diagnosis, and algorithms for pharmacological and non-drug therapy in patients with cardiogenic shock.

Purpose To compare of the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MM) and azathioprine in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of lymphocytic myocarditis. Methods The study included 45 patients with lymphocytic myocarditis, 34 male, the average age 48.1±11.2 years. The diagnosis of myocarditis is verified by endomyocardial biopsy. In ten patients of both groups, the parvovirus B19 DNA was detected in the myocardium. All patients had heart failure 3 [3; 3] NYHA class. High immune activity was indicated by the presence of anti-heart antibodies in all patients. Group 1 included twenty-six patients who received MM 2 g per day. Twenty of them were naive; six patients received MM instead of azathioprine, which was canceled due to cytopenia and/or insufficient effect. Group 2 included nineteen patients who received azathioprine at an average dose of 100 [75; 150] mg per day. Patients of both groups also received methylprednisolone in an average starting dose 24 [24; 32] mg per day and standard therapy for heart failure. Initial group distribution was random. Patients in both groups did not differ significantly in baseline parameters. The mean follow-up period was 23 [8; 57] months (12 and 34 months in the groups). The study is approved by the university ethics committee. Results The level of anti-heart antibodies significantly decreased in both groups. In both groups there was a significant improvement in the structural and functional parameters of the heart: NYHA class decreased from 3 [2.75; 3] to 2 [1; 2] (group 1, p Conclusion In patients with lymphocytic myocarditis, a combination of moderate doses of corticosteroids with MM is at least no less effective and safe than steroids with azathioprine. With a shorter follow-up period, the tendency to lower mortality and a more pronounced improvement in structural parameters with better tolerance was noted in the MM group. MM should be considered as an alternative option in the treatment of isolated lymphocytic myocarditis. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Purpose To study clinical features of myocarditis and its possible mechanisms (including persistence of SARS-Cov-2 in the myocardium) in the long-term period after acute COVID-19. Methods Fifteen patients (8 male and 7 female, mean age 47.8±13.4, 24–65 years) diagnosed with postcovid myocarditis were included in the study. The diagnosis of COVID-19 was confirmed by positive PCR results in 40%, and seroconversion in all patients. The average time of admission after COVID-19 was 4 [3; 7] months, from 2 to 9 months. The diagnosis of myocarditis was confirmed by cardiac MRI in 10 patients and by right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) in 6 patients. The PCR for cardiotropic viruses and PCR with immunohistochemical study for SARS-Cov2 detection were used. All patients had study for anti-heart antibodies (AHA), EchoCG, and Holter ECG. Coronary atherosclerosis was excluded in all patients over 40 years (7 coronary angiography, 4 cardiac CT). Results A clear association of the cardiac symptoms with a previous new coronavirus infection was noted in all patients. The symptoms started 1–5 months following COVID-19. MRI showed subepicardial and intramyocardial LGE, signs of hyperemia, increased T1 relaxation time, edema. AHA levels were increased 3–4-fold in 73%. Two variants of postcovid myocarditis were observed. 1. Arrhythmic variant (n=6) – newly developed frequent supraventricular or ventricular extrasystole, recurrent atrial fibrillation in the absence of systolic dysfunction. 2. Decompensated variant with biventricular heart failure (n=9): the mean LV EF was 34.1±7.8% (23 to 46%), LV EDD 5.8±0.7 cm, EDV 153.8±46.1 ml, pulmonary artery systolic pressure 40.7±11.2 mmHg. In one case, myocarditis was accompanied by IgG4- and ANCA-negative aortitis. SARS-Cov-2 RNA was detected in 4 of 5 myocardial biopsies (in one case the material in the study). The longest period of virus persistence after COVID-19 was 9 months. By using spike and nucleocapsid antibodies, coronavirus was detected in cardiomycytes and macrophages. Data of patients with morphologically proved myocarditis are presented in Table 1. Lymphocytic myocarditis was diagnosed and confirmed immunohistochemically (n=5); giant cell myocarditis with atrial standstill was detected in one more case (Fig. 1). Three patients had also signs of endocarditis, in two cases with parietal thrombosis. Conclusions COVID-19 can lead to the subacute and chronic myocarditis of varying severity. Post-COVID myocarditis manifests itself in two main clinical forms - isolated arrhythmias and systolic dysfunction with heart failure. Post-COVID myocarditis is characterized by prolonged persistence of coronavirus (up to 9 months in this study, in most patients with decompensated variant) in combination with high immune activity (high titers of AHA), which should be considered as the main mechanisms of its long-term course. Treatment approaches for such myocarditis require investigation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1. Patients with EMB proved myocarditisFigure 1. The EMB in postcovide myocarditis

The possibility of heart inflammation (both myocardial and endocardial) months after a coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been practically studied, especially since approaches to the treatment of myocarditis in combination with various endocarditis forms have not been developed.Aim. To study the prevalence and mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2-associated endocardial injury in patients with morphologically verified post-COVID-19 myocarditis, as well as to develop approaches to comprehensive therapy.Material and methods. The study included 18 patients with severe morphologically verified post-COVID-19 myocarditis (men, 9; 51,1±9,4 years; 35 to 66 years). Patients with prior verified myocarditis/myocardial infarction, rheumatic heart disease, and systemic immune diseases were excluded. The average time after COVID-19 was 6,5 [3.5; 10] months The diagnosis of myocarditis was confirmed by endomyocardial biopsy (including immunohistochemical examination with antibodies to CD3, CD20, CD45, CD68, and to SARS-CoV-2 antigens; polymerase chain reaction for SARS-CoV-2 RNA, DNA of cardiotropic viruses). The blood level of anticardiac antibodies was determined by indirect immunofluorescence. In addition, echocardiography, magnetic resonance imaging (n=8), cardiac multislice tomography (n=1), and coronary angiography (n=14) were performed.Results. Biopsy revealed active (n=12) and borderline (n=3) lymphocytic myocarditis, eosinophilic (n=2) and giant cell (n=1) myocarditis. In 4 patients, nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) with parietal and intravascular thrombosis was diagnosed, and in one patient — infective endocarditis (IE) of the bicuspid aortic valve. Myocardial persistence of SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 72% of cases (in 3 patients — with NBTE; in 1 — with IE; in 9 — without endocarditis). Titers of anticardiac antibodies increased by 3-4 times in 94% of patients. Patients with endocarditis were characterized by larger heart chambers, lower ejection fraction (27,5±6,6 vs 36,0±13,4%), more severe pulmonary hypertension, and valvular regurgitation. Intraventricular thrombosis according to echocardiography/magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac embolism was not observed. Treatment in all patients included methylprednisolone at an average dose of 24 mg a day. In 10 patients, the result was monitored for at least 3 months as follows: the ejection fraction was 46,0±12,7% and 44,3±7,3% in patients with and without endocarditis, respectively.Conclusion. Endocarditis in patients with post-COVID-19 myocarditis was detected in 28% (1 patient — IE; 4 — NBTE). The key mechanisms of post-COVID-19 myocarditis and NBTE are long-term (up to 18 months) myocardial persistence of SARS-Cov-2 and the development of an autoimmune reaction. Endocarditis was diagnosed in more severe patients, including those with giant cell and eosinophilic myocarditis. The effectiveness of steroid therapy in combination with anticoagulants in patients with NBTE requires further study. In case of IE, steroids can also be used in the treatment of myocarditis (in combination with antibiotics and immunoglobulin).

Aim. To study the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MM) in combination with corticosteroids in the treatment of lymphocytic myocarditis in comparison with a standard combination of corticosteroids and azathioprine.Material and methods. The study included 46 patients aged 18 years and older with severe and moderate lymphocytic myocarditis (men, 34; women 12; mean age, 53,5±13,0 years). The diagnosis was verified using endomyocardial biopsy. Symptom duration averaged 9,5 [4; 20.25] months. All patients had class 3 [2,75; 3] heart failure (HF). The main group included 29 patients who received MM 2 g/day, including six patients — instead of azathioprine, which was canceled due to cytopenia (n=3) or insufficient effect (n=3). The comparison group included 17 patients who received azathioprine 150 [100; 150] mg/day. Patients of both groups also received methylprednisolone at a starting dose of 24 [24; 32] and 24 [24; 24] mg/day and standard HF therapy. In 7/2 patients, the parvovirus B19 genome was detected in the myocardium. In all cases, an increase in anticardiac antibody titers was evidence of immune activity. The average follow-up period was 24 [12; 54] months (at least 6 months).Results. The groups were completely comparable in age, initial characteristics and standard drug therapy. In both groups, a comparable significant increase in the ejection fraction (EF) was noted as follows: from 31,2±7,6 to 44,7±8,3% and from 29±9,1 to 46±11,9% (pConclusion. In patients with moderate and severe virus-negative (except for parvovirus B19) lymphocytic myocarditis, the combination of moderate-dose corticosteroids with mycophenolate mofetil 2 g/day is at least no less effective than the standard regimen of immunosuppressive therapy. There was a tendency towards a more pronounced decrease in anticardiac antibody titers in combination with better tolerance (no cases of cytopenia) in MM group. MM in combination with corticosteroids can be recommended as an alternative treatment regimen for lymphocytic myocarditis.

Cytochemical parameters of intracellular metabolism of leukemia cells and bone marrow polyamines were studied in 113 acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients aged from 1 to 14 years. The parameters analyzed characterized the severity of the disease course, cytostatic therapy effectiveness and primary resistance. It is shown that determination of biochemical and cytochemical criteria before the beginning of acute lymphoblastic leukemia therapy may be conducive to the correct choice of treatment.

Several concentrations of Fluorocarbon emulsion as means for anti-ischemic protection of the liver were studied in experiments on 47 rabbits with hypothermic perfusion of isolated liver exposed to 90 minute ischaemia. the best concentration of Fluorocarbon emulsion for perfusion of isolated liver was 12%.