Search

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic disabling disease that results in considerable loss of physical function in patients over time. The ultimate goal of therapy is remission, a clinical state with a highly variable definition in the literature. For the purpose of achieving the best patient outcome, it is important to maintain the lowest possible disease activity. Therefore, stringent remission criteria should be chosen, which will lead to the best possible prevention of structural and functional decline. Standardised intensive therapeutic strategies and algorithms should form the basis for the administration of anti-rheumatic medication.

Item does not contain fulltext

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVES: To assess the ability of efficacy measures that incorporate onset or sustainability to detect treatment effect or reflect patient satisfaction, using exploratory analyses of data from the ATTAIN (Abatacept Trial in Treatment of Anti-TNF INadequate Responders) trial. METHODS: 218 abatacept- and 99 placebo-treated patients were evaluated. Reporting methods included time to onset (first American College of Rheumatology [ACR] 50 response/Low Disease Activity State [LDAS; DAS28 < or =3.2]) and sustainability of ACR50/LDAS, both assessed according to discriminatory capacity (number of patients needed to study [NNS]) and patient satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: Efficacy measures incorporating elements of sustainability or onset decreased discriminatory capacity, while sustainability, but not onset of action, was important in reflecting patient satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal assessment methods depend on whether the outcome of interest is ability to detect treatment effects or to reflect patient satisfaction. Sustainability of response (and possibly, at a lower magnitude, fast onset of action) may be important when evaluating patient satisfaction with RA therapies in patients who have previously failed anti-TNF therapy.

Contains fulltext : 48816.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Closed access) Agreement on response criteria in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has allowed better standardization and interpretation of clinical trial reports. With recent advances in therapy, the proportion of patients achieving a satisfactory state of minimal disease activity (MDA) is becoming a more important measure with which to compare different treatment strategies. The threshold for MDA is between high disease activity and remission and, by definition, anyone in remission will also be in MDA. True remission is still rare in RA; in addition, the American College of Rheumatology definition is difficult to apply in the context of trials. Participants at OMERACT 6 in 2002 agreed on a conceptual definition of minimal disease activity (MDA): "that state of disease activity deemed a useful target of treatment by both the patient and the physician, given current treatment possibilities and limitations." To prepare for a preliminary operational definition of MDA for use in clinical trials, we asked rheumatologists to assess 60 patient profiles describing real RA patients seen in routine clinical practice. Based on their responses, several candidate definitions for MDA were designed and discussed at the OMERACT 7 in 2004. Feedback from participants and additional on-site analyses in a cross-sectional database allowed the formulation of 2 preliminary, equivalent definitions of MDA: one based on the Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) index, and one based on meeting cutpoints in 5 out the 7 WHO/ILAR core set measures. Researchers applying these definitions first need to choose whether to use the DAS28 or the core set definition, because although each selects a similar proportion in a population, these are not always the same patients. In both MDA definitions, an initial decision node places all patients in MDA who have a tender joint count of 0 and a swollen joint count of 0, and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) no greater than 10 mm. If this condition is not met: * The DAS28 definition places patients in MDA when DAS28 < or = 2.85; * The core set definition places patients in MDA when they meet 5 of 7 criteria: (1) Pain (0-10) < or = 2; (2) Swollen joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (3) Tender joint count (0-28) < or = 1; (4) Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ, 0-3) < or = 0.5; (5) Physician global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 1.5; (6) Patient global assessment of disease activity (0-10) < or = 2; (7) ESR < or = 20. This set of 2 definitions gained approval of 73% of the attendees. These (and other) definitions will now be subject to further validation in other databases.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the recently proposed preliminary criteria for the classification of Sjogren9s syndrome (SS) in a multicentre European study of a new series of clinically defined cases. METHODS: The criteria included six items: I = ocular symptoms; II = oral symptoms; III = evidence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca; IV = focal sialoadenitis by minor salivary gland biopsy; V = instrumental evidence of salivary gland involvement; VI = presence of autoantibodies. Each centre was asked to provide five patients with primary SS, five with secondary SS, five with connective tissue diseases (CTD) but without SS, and five controls (patients with ocular or oral features that may simulate SS). The preliminary six item classification criteria set was applied to both the SS patients and the non-SS controls, and the performance of the criteria in terms of sensitivity and specificity was tested. RESULTS: The criteria set was tested on a total of 278 cases (157 SS patients and 121 non-SS controls) collected from 16 centres in 10 countries. At least four of the six items in the criteria set (limiting item VI to the presence of Ro(SS-A) or La(SS-B) antibodies) were present in 79 of 81 patients initially classified as having primary SS (sensitivity 97.5%), but in only seven of 121 non-SS controls (specificity 94.2%). When the presence of item I or II plus any two of items III-V of the criteria set was considered as indicative of secondary SS, 97.3% (71 of 73) of the patients initially defined as having this disorder and 91.8% (45 of 49) of the control patients with CTD without SS were correctly classified. CONCLUSION: This prospective study confirmed the high validity and reliability of the classification criteria for SS recently proposed by the European Community Study Group.

Since infections with Herpetoviridae after kidney transplantation still remain a major clinical problem, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial using low-dose recombinant interferon-alpha-2C (rIFNa2C) prophylaxis in 50 renal graft recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. Ten patients were excluded from further analysis because of graft loss due to surgical complications, side effects of rIFNa2C, and because of lack of compliance. There was a significant difference in graft loss due to irreversible rejections between the verum and the placebo group (6 vs. 0; P less than 0.05), whereas no difference was observed with regard to the occurrence of viral infections. We conclude, that low-dose rIFNa2C prophylaxis is harmful in renal allograft recipients treated with cyclosporine in view of the high incidence of irreversible transplant rejections without beneficial effects on the occurrence of viral infections.

The first definition of remission in rheumatoid arthritis was proposed by Pinals and colleagues in 1981. Although its development process was of high quality, the definition proved unfeasible and was not often applied. Subsequently many other definitions appeared, either as variations or as cutpoints of disease activity indices. The American College of Rheumatology, together with the European League Against Rheumatism and the Initiative for Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) decided to develop a new definition that would meet the OMERACT Filter of Truth, discrimination and Feasibility. This article summarizes the development process to date. The new definition is expected to be launched in 2010.