Search

L cells are an important class of enteroendocrine cells secreting hormones such as glucagon like peptide-1 and peptide YY that have several metabolic and physiological effects. The gut is home to trillions of bacteria affecting host physiology, but there has been limited understanding about how the microbiota affects gene expression in L cells. Thus, we rederived the reporter mouse strain, GLU-Venus expressing yellow fluorescent protein under the control of the proglucagon gene, as germ-free (GF). Lpos cells from ileum and colon of GF and conventionally raised (CONV-R) GLU-Venus mice were isolated and subjected to transcriptomic profiling. We observed that the microbiota exerted major effects on ileal L cells. Gene Ontology enrichment analysis revealed that microbiota suppressed biological processes related to vesicle localization and synaptic vesicle cycling in Lpos cells from ileum. This finding was corroborated by electron microscopy of Lpos cells showing reduced numbers of vesicles as well as by demonstrating decreased intracellular GLP-1 content in primary cultures from ileum of CONV-R compared with GF GLU-Venus mice. By analysing Lpos cells following colonization of GF mice we observed that the greatest transcriptional regulation was evident within 1 day of colonization. Thus, the microbiota has a rapid and pronounced effect on the L cell transcriptome, predominantly in the ileum.

A library of robust ghrelin receptor mutants with single substitutions at 22 positions in the main ligand-binding pocket was employed to map binding sites for six different agonists: two peptides (the 28-amino-acid octanoylated endogenous ligand ghrelin and the hexapeptide growth hormone secretagogue GHRP-6) plus four nonpeptide agonists-the original benzolactam L-692,429 [3-amino-3-methyl-N-(2,3,4,5-tetrahydro-2-oxo-1-([2'-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl) (1,1'-biphenyl)-4-yl]methyl)-1H-1-benzazepin-3(R)-yl)-butanamide], the spiroindoline sulfonamide MK-677 [N-[1(R)-1, 2-dihydro-1-ethanesulfonylspiro-3H-indole-3,4'-piperidin)-1'-yl]carbonyl-2-(phenylmethoxy)-ethyl-2-amino-2-methylpropanamide], and two novel oxindole derivatives, SM-130686 [(+)-6-carbamoyl-3-(2-chlorophenyl)-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-trifluoromethyloxindole] and SM-157740 [(+/-)-6-carbamoyl-3-(2, 4-dichlorophenyl)-(2-diethylaminoethyl)-4-trifluoromethyloxindole)]. The strongest mutational effect with respect to decrease in potency for stimulation of inositol phosphate turnover was for all six agonists the GluIII:09-to-Gln substitution in the extracellular segment of TM-III. Likewise, all six agonists were affected by substitutions of PheVI:16, ArgVI:20, and PheVI:23 on the opposing face of transmembrane domain (TM) VI. Each of the agonists was also affected selectively by specific mutations. The mutational map of the ability of L-692,429 and GHRP-6 to act as allosteric modulators by increasing ghrelin's maximal efficacy overlapped with the common mutational map for agonism but it was not identical with the map for the agonist property of these small-molecule ligands. In molecular models, built over the inactive conformation of rhodopsin, low energy conformations of the nonpeptide agonists could be docked to satisfy many of their mutational hits. It is concluded that although each of the ligands in addition exploits other parts of the receptor, a large, common binding site for both small-molecule agonists--including ago-allosteric modulators--and the endogenous agonist is found on the opposing faces of TM-III and -VI of the ghrelin receptor.

An almost exponential development has occurred within the last five years in the area of non-peptide ligands for G protein-coupled 7TM receptors. For most of the major peptide targets a number of highly selective high affinity antagonists are today available and recently the first non-peptide agonists have started to appear as well. Mutational mapping of binding sites, which has reached a reasonably detailed level especially in the tachykinin and angiotensin systems, indicate that the peptide agonists are primarily interacting with residues located in the exterior part of the main ligand binding pocket, i.e. between the loops and the outermost segments of the trans-membrane helices. Some peptides may reach down between the helices, however, a peptide as substance P does not appear to interact at all with residues corresponding to the deeply located presumed binding site for monoamines. In contrast, presumed interaction points for non-peptide antagonists are predominantly found in the deep part of the main ligand binding pocket between the transmembrane segments. In general, it has been unexpectedly difficult and in some well characterized cases, even impossible to identify point mutations which affect both peptide agonists and non-peptide antagonists - while multiple mutations affect either one or the other ligand. These surprising observations may be explained by an allosteric receptor model where the ligands exert their effect merely by selecting and stabilizing preformed receptor conformations and thereby shifting the equilibrium towards either an active or an inactive form. In this receptor model there is no requirement for a common 'lock' for all agonists and it does not demand an overlap in binding site between competitive ligands - they can compete by binding in a mutually exclusive fashion, thus being allosteric competitive in contrast to isosteric classical competitive ligands.