1. The hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable aortic bioprostheses in the elderly: a comparison between rapid deployment and transcatheter implantation
- Author
-
Fortunato Iacovelli, Paolo Desario, Alessandro Cafaro, Antonio Pignatelli, Rossella Alemanni, Rosamaria Montesanti, Alessandro Santo Bortone, Emanuela De Cillis, Micaela De Palo, Luca Bardi, Gian Luca Martinelli, Tullio Tesorio, Mauro Cassese, and Gaetano Contegiacomo
- Subjects
Bioprosthesis ,Canada ,Hemodynamics ,Stroke Volume ,Aortic Valve Stenosis ,Prosthesis Design ,Ventricular Function, Left ,Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement ,Treatment Outcome ,Aortic Valve ,Heart Valve Prosthesis ,Humans ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ,Aged - Abstract
Surgical aortic valve replacement with a rapid deployment valve (RDV) is a relatively recent treatment option. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic performance of balloon-expandable (BE)-RDVs and BE-transcatheter heart valves (THVs) in a high surgical risk and frail-elderly population.BE-THVs and BE-RDVs were implanted in 138 and 47 patients, respectively, all older than 75 years and with a Canadian Study of Health and Aging category of 5 or above. Echocardiographic assessment was performed at discharge and six months later.At discharge, transprosthetic pressure gradients and indexed effective orifice area (iEOA) were similar in both cohorts. At six-month follow-up, BE-RDVs showed lower peak (14.69 vs. 20.86 mmHg; p 0.001) and mean (7.82 vs. 11.83 mmHg; p 0.001) gradients, and larger iEOA (1.05 vs. 0.84 cmBE-RDVs showed better hemodynamic performance, especially when implanted in small annuli. Despite their worse baseline conditions, transcatheter patients still exhibited a greater improvement of their echocardiographic profile at mid-term follow-up.
- Published
- 2022