1. A Dialogic Approach to Teaching Person-Centered Care in Graduate Medical Education
- Author
-
Tarek Abdelhalim, Umberin Najeeb, Sarah Wright, Cynthia Whitehead, Victoria A. Boyd, Rene Wong, Mary J. Bell, Dominique Piquette, Paula Veinot, Arno K. Kumagai, Ayelet Kuper, Lisa C. Richardson, Zac Feilchenfeld, and Shail Rawal
- Subjects
Models, Educational ,Medical education ,Dialogic ,Faculty, Medical ,Teaching ,Professional development ,Person-centered care ,Graduate medical education ,MEDLINE ,Internship and Residency ,General Medicine ,Patient-centered care ,Education, Medical, Graduate ,Patient-Centered Care ,ComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION ,Educational Innovation ,Humans ,Program development ,Curriculum ,Staff Development ,Program Development ,Psychology - Abstract
Background Training future physicians to provide compassionate, equitable, person-centered care remains a challenge for medical educators. Dialogues offer an opportunity to extend person-centered education into clinical care. In contrast to discussions, dialogues encourage the sharing of authority, expertise, and perspectives to promote new ways of understanding oneself and the world. The best methods for implementing dialogic teaching in graduate medical education have not been identified. Objective We developed and implemented a co-constructed faculty development program to promote dialogic teaching and learning in graduate medical education. Methods Beginning in April 2017, we co-constructed, with a pilot working group (PWG) of physician teachers, ways to prepare for and implement dialogic teaching in clinical settings. We kept detailed implementation notes and interviewed PWG members. Data were iteratively co-analyzed using a qualitative description approach within a constructivist paradigm. Ongoing analysis informed iterative changes to the faculty development program and dialogic education model. Patient and learner advisers provided practical guidance. Results The concepts and practice of dialogic teaching resonated with PWG members. However, they indicated that dialogic teaching was easier to learn about than to implement, citing insufficient time, lack of space, and other structural issues as barriers. Patient and learner advisers provided insights that deepened design, implementation, and eventual evaluation of the education model by sharing experiences related to person-centered care. Conclusions While PWG members found that the faculty development program supported the implementation of dialogic teaching, successfully enabling this approach requires expertise, willingness, and support to teach knowledge and skills not traditionally included in medical curricula.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF