Search

Additional file 3. Table S3. Kinship associations and associated log-likelihood ratios (LLR) among B. heckerae individuals (ID) collected from Blake Ridge seep, with one individual collected near Norfolk canyon, as predicted by SEQUOIA. TopRel = second column ID relative to first column ID and includes grandparent (GP) and half avuncular (HA) - great-grandparents/cousins.

Additional file 5. Figure S2. A score plot displaying the projection of each G. childressi sample, used in the selection analyses, onto the principal components of the PCA conducted in pcadapt. Samples are color coded by seep site: Baltimore Canyon Seep (BCS), pink; Norfolk Canyon Seep (NCS), blue; and Chincoteague Seep (CTS), green.

Additional file 2. Table S2. Kinship associations and associated log-likelihood ratios (LLR) among G. childressi individuals (ID) collected from the three different seep sites as predicted by SEQUOIA. TopRel = second column ID relative to first column ID and includes parent-offspring (PO), full siblings (FS), grandparent (GP) and half avuncular (HA) - great-grandparents /cousins.

Additional file 4. Figure S1.. Average probability of membership graph for G. childressi (n = 81) collected from seeps at Norfolk canyon (NCS), Chincoteague (CTS) and Baltimore Canyon (BCS). K = 3 clusters (ancestral populations), as identified by STRUCTURE, and also reported here as it had similar deltaK values as K=2, both indicating panmixia.

Additional file 2. Table S2. Kinship associations and associated log-likelihood ratios (LLR) among G. childressi individuals (ID) collected from the three different seep sites as predicted by SEQUOIA. TopRel = second column ID relative to first column ID and includes parent-offspring (PO), full siblings (FS), grandparent (GP) and half avuncular (HA) - great-grandparents /cousins.

Additional file 7. Figure S3. Reduced representation of the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process categories shown in Figure 6, and corresponding putative number of genes linked to each process, that are associated with the outlier SNPs identified with pcadapt.

Additional file 7. Figure S3. Reduced representation of the Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process categories shown in Figure 6, and corresponding putative number of genes linked to each process, that are associated with the outlier SNPs identified with pcadapt.

Additional file 5. Figure S2. A score plot displaying the projection of each G. childressi sample, used in the selection analyses, onto the principal components of the PCA conducted in pcadapt. Samples are color coded by seep site: Baltimore Canyon Seep (BCS), pink; Norfolk Canyon Seep (NCS), blue; and Chincoteague Seep (CTS), green.

Additional file 4. Figure S1.. Average probability of membership graph for G. childressi (n = 81) collected from seeps at Norfolk canyon (NCS), Chincoteague (CTS) and Baltimore Canyon (BCS). K = 3 clusters (ancestral populations), as identified by STRUCTURE, and also reported here as it had similar deltaK values as K=2, both indicating panmixia.

Additional file 3. Table S3. Kinship associations and associated log-likelihood ratios (LLR) among B. heckerae individuals (ID) collected from Blake Ridge seep, with one individual collected near Norfolk canyon, as predicted by SEQUOIA. TopRel = second column ID relative to first column ID and includes grandparent (GP) and half avuncular (HA) - great-grandparents/cousins.

We consider the opportunities and challenges associated with organizing a conference online, using a case study of a medium-sized (approx. 400 participants) international conference held virtually in August 2020. In addition, we present quantifiable evidence of the participants' experience using the results from an online post-conference questionnaire. Although the virtual meeting was not able to replicate the in-person experience in some aspects (e.g. less engagement between participants) the overwhelming majority of respondents found the meeting an enjoyable experience and would join similar events again. Notably, there was a strong desire for future in-person meetings to have at least some online component. Online attendance by lower-income researchers was higher compared with a past, similar-themed in-person meeting held in a high-income nation, but comparable to one held in an upper-middle-income nation. This indicates that online conferences are not a panacea to increasing diversity and inclusivity, and that holding in-person meetings in developing economies can be at least as effective. Given that it is now relatively easy to stream contents of meetings online using low-cost methods, there are clear benefits in making all presented content accessible online, as well as organizing online networking events for those unable to attend in person.