Search

sj-pdf-1-hhc-10.1177_10848223231170019 for Health System Quality and Performance Indicators for Evaluating Home Care Programming: A Scoping Review by Max Jajszczok, Cathy A. Eastwood, Hude Quan, Laurel D. Scott, Abram Gutscher and Rachel Zhao in Home Health Care Management & Practice

Additional file 1: Appendix 1. Quantitative survey to collect data on the current use of pediatric PROMs and PREMs in Alberta. Appendix 2. The interview guide to collect qualitative data on the use of pediatric PROMs and PREMs in Albertaand the challenges associated with their implementation.

Additional file 3. Comparison between ICD-10-CA and ICD-11 Coding Structure

Additional file 1. Chart review conditions for data collection

Additional file 2. Data Dictionary for ICD-11 Field Trial

Additional file 4. Examples of changes made to ICD-11

Additional file 1. Appendix 1: Interview Guide.

Search strategy terms used in Ovid, MEDLINE and Embase databases.

Authors’ original file for figure 2

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-cjk-10.1177_20543581211029389 for Perioperative Outcomes Following Kidney-Pancreas Transplantation in Alberta, Canada: Research Letter by Danielle E. Fox, Robert R. Quinn, Paul E. Ronksley, Tyrone G. Harrison, Hude Quan, David Bigam, A. M. James Shapiro, Rachel Jeong and Ngan N. Lam in Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease

Authors’ original file for figure 1

Background The Asian population is one of the fastest growing ethnic minority groups in western countries. However, cancer screening uptake is consistently lower in this group than in the native-born populations. As a first step towards developing an effective cancer screening intervention program targeting Asian women, we conducted a comprehensive systematic review, without geographic, language or date limitations, to update current knowledge on the effectiveness of existing intervention strategies to enhance breast and cervical screening uptake in Asian women. Methods This study systematically reviewed studies published as of January 2010 to synthesize knowledge about effectiveness of cancer screening interventions targeting Asian women. Fifteen multidisciplinary peer-reviewed and grey literature databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Results The results of our systematic review were reported in accordance with the PRISMA Statement. Of 37 selected intervention studies, only 18 studies included valid outcome measures (i.e. self-reported or recorded receipt of mammograms or Pap smear). 11 of the 18 intervention studies with valid outcome measures used multiple intervention strategies to target individuals in a specific Asian ethnic group. This observed pattern of intervention design supports the hypothesis that employing a combination of multiple strategies is more likely to be successful than single interventions. The effectiveness of community-based or workplace-based group education programs increases when additional supports, such as assistance in scheduling/attending screening and mobile screening services are provided. Combining cultural awareness training for health care professionals with outreach workers who can help healthcare professionals overcome language and cultural barriers is likely to improve cancer screening uptake. Media campaigns and mailed culturally sensitive print materials alone may be ineffective in increasing screening uptake. Intervention effectiveness appears to vary with ethnic population, methods of program delivery, and study setting. Conclusions Despite some limitations, our review has demonstrated that the effectiveness of existing interventions to promote breast and cervical cancer screening uptake in Asian women may hinge on a variety of factors, such as type of intervention and study population characteristics. While some studies demonstrated the effectiveness of certain intervention programs, the cost effectiveness and long-term sustainability of these programs remain questionable. When adopting an intervention program, it is important to consider the impacts of social-and cultural factors specific to the Asian population on cancer screening uptake. Future research is needed to develop new interventions and tools, and adopt vigorous study design and evaluation methodologies to increase cancer screening among Asian women to promote population health and health equity.

Background Kappa is commonly used when assessing the agreement of conditions with reference standard, but has been criticized for being highly dependent on the prevalence. To overcome this limitation, a prevalence-adjusted and bias-adjusted kappa (PABAK) has been developed. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the performance of Kappa and PABAK, and assess the agreement between hospital discharge administrative data and chart review data conditions. Methods The agreement was compared for random sampling, restricted sampling by conditions, and case-control sampling from the four teaching hospitals in Alberta, Canada from ICD10 administrative data during January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2003. A total of 4,008 hospital discharge records and chart view, linked for personal unique identifier and admission date, for 32 conditions of random sampling were analyzed. The restricted sample for hypertension, myocardial infarction and congestive heart failure, and case-control sample for those three conditions were extracted from random sample. The prevalence, kappa, PABAK, positive agreement, negative agreement for the condition was compared for each of three samples. Results The prevalence of each condition was highly dependent on the sampling method, and this variation in prevalence had a significant effect on both kappa and PABAK. PABAK values were obviously high for certain conditions with low kappa values. The gap between these two statistical values for the same condition narrowed as the prevalence of the condition approached 50%. Conclusion Kappa values varied more widely than PABAK values across the 32 conditions. PABAK values should usually not be interpreted as measuring the same agreement as kappa in administrative data, particular for the condition with low prevalence. There is no single statistic measuring agreement that captures the desired information for validity of administrative data. Researchers should report kappa, the prevalence, positive agreement, negative agreement, and the relative frequency in each cell (i.e. a, b, c and d) to enable the reader to judge the validity of administrative data from multiple aspects.

Secondary journals such as ACP Journal Club (ACP), Journal Watch (JW) and Internal Medicine Alert (IMA) have enormous potential to help clinicians remain up to date with medical knowledge. However, for clinicians to evaluate the validity and applicability of new findings, they need information on the study design, methodology and results.Beginning with the first issue in March 1997, we selected 50 consecutive summaries of studies addressing therapy or prevention and internal medicine content from each of the ACP, JW and IMA. We evaluated the summaries for completeness of reporting key aspects of study design, methodology and results.All of the summaries in ACP reported study design, as compared with 72% of the summaries in JW and IMA (p0.001). In summaries of randomized controlled trials the 3 secondary journals were similar in reporting concealment of patient allocation (none reported this), blinding status of participants (ACP 62%, JW 70% and IMA 70% [p = 0.7]), blinding status of health care providers (ACP 12%, JW 4% and IMA 4% [p = 0.4]) and blinding status of judicial assessors of outcomes (ACP 4%, JW 4% and IMA 0% [p = 0.4]). ACP was the only one to report whether investigators conducted an intention-to-treat analysis (in 38% of summaries [p0.001]), and it was more likely than the other 2 journals to report the precision of the treatment effect (as a p value or 95% confidence interval) (ACP 100%, JW 0% and IMA 55% [p0.001]).Although ACP provided more information on study design, methodology and results, all 3 secondary journals often omitted important information. More complete reporting is necessary for secondary journals to fulfill their potential to help clinicians evaluate the medical literature.