Search

Your search keyword '"Planchamp, F"' showing total 6 results
Start Over Author "Planchamp, F" Language undetermined
6 results on '"Planchamp, F"'

1. Surveillance Bulletin 2007. Guidelines for clinical practice: management of patients with malignant epithelial tumors of the ovary. First line medical treatment,Communiqué Bulletin de veille 2007. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: prise en charge des patientes atteintes de tumeurs épithéliales malignes de l'ovaire. Traitement médical de première ligne

Author

Lhommé, C., Planchamp, F., Joly, F., eric leblanc, Albin, N., Alliot, C., Auclerc, G., Cappiello, M., Chaigneau, L., Delva, R., Dohollou, N., Guillemet, C., Misset, J. L., Ray-Coquard, I., Rhliouch, H., Touboul, E., and Tournigand, C.

4. Alert bulletin 2007. Recommendations for clinical practice: Management of patients suffering from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors. First-line medical treatment,Bulletin de veille 2007. Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Prise en charge des patientes atteintes de tumeurs épithéliales malignes de l'ovaire - Traitement médical de première ligne

Author

Lhommé, C., Planchamp, F., Joly, F., Leblanc, E., Nicolas Albin, Alliot, C., Auclerc, G., Cappiello, M., Chaigneau, L., Delva, R., Dohollou, N., Guillemet, C., Misset, J. -L, Ray-Coquard, I., Rhliouch, H., Touboul, E., and Tournigand, C.

5. Watch synthesis 2006 bulletin. Recommendations for the clinical practice: The use of PET-FDG in the cancers of the esophagus, stomach, colon and rectum, the anal canal, the small bowel, pancreas and biliary ducts, liver and the endocrine tumors (gastrointestinal system) | Recommandations pour la pratique clinique: Utilisation de la TEP-FDG dans les cancers de l'œsophage, de l'estomac, du côlon et du rectum, du canal anal, de l'intestin grêle, du pancréas et des voies biliaires, du foie et les tumeurs endocrines (système digestif)

Author

Bourguet, P., Planchamp, F., Jacques MONTEIL, Metges, J. -P, Mitry, E., Tubiana-Mathieu, N., Luet, D., Marchal, F., Bouché, O., Conroy, T., and Bonichon, F.

6. European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer

Author

Ignace Vergote, Jordi Ponce, David Cibula, Patrice Mathevet, Francesco Raspagliesi, Christina Fotopoulou, Pauline Wimberger, Christhardt Köhler, Fabio Landoni, François Planchamp, Raj Naik, Karl Tamussino, Ane Gerda Zahl Eriksson, Denis Querleu, Alexandros Rodolakis, Daniela Fischerova, Cagatay Taskiran, Cibula, D, Planchamp, F, Fischerova, D, Fotopoulou, C, Kohler, C, Landoni, F, Mathevet, P, Naik, R, Ponce, J, Raspagliesi, F, Rodolakis, A, Tamussino, K, Taskiran, C, Vergote, I, Wimberger, P, Zahl Eriksson, A, and Querleu, D

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, Càncer de coll uterí, Process (engineering), cervical cancer, media_common.quotation_subject, Cirurgia ginecològica, Audit, Gynecologic surgery, surgical oncology, Gynecologic Surgical Procedures, Cervix cancer, Cirurgia oncològica, uterine cervical neoplasms, medicine, Humans, Quality (business), Medical physics, Internal validation, Surgical treatment, Quality Indicators, Health Care, media_common, Cervical cancer, business.industry, Gynaecological oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, medicine.disease, Oncology, Surgical oncology, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Female, business, Institutional quality
Abstract

BackgroundOptimizing and ensuring the quality of surgical care is essential to improve the management and outcome of patients with cervical cancer.To develop a list of quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer that can be used to audit and improve clinical practice.MethodsQuality indicators were developed using a four-step evaluation process that included a systematic literature search to identify potential quality indicators, in-person meetings of an ad hoc group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large panel of European clinicians and patient representatives.ResultsFifteen structural, process, and outcome indicators were selected. Using a structured format, each quality indicator has a description specifying what the indicator is measuring. Measurability specifications are also detailed to define how the indicator will be measured in practice. Each indicator has a target which gives practitioners and health administrators a quantitative basis for improving care and organizational processes.DiscussionImplementation of institutional quality assurance programs can improve quality of care, even in high-volume centers. This set of quality indicators from the European Society of Gynaecological Cancer may be a major instrument to improve the quality of surgical treatment of cervical cancer.

Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results