Search

The need for patient navigator is growing, and there is a lack of cost evaluation, especially during survivorship.The objective of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an Ambulatory Medical Assistance (AMA) programme in patients with haematological malignancies (HM).A cost-effectiveness analysis of the AMA programme was performed compared to a simulated control arm.An interventional, single-arm and prospective study was conducted in a French reference haematology-oncology centre between 2016 and 2020.Adult patients were enrolled with histologically documented malignant haematology, during their active therapy phase, and treated either by intravenous chemotherapy or oral therapy.An extrapolation of the effectiveness was derived from a similar nurse monitoring programme (CAPRI study). Cost effectiveness of the programme was evaluated through adverse events of Grade 3 or 4 avoided in different populations.Included patient (n = 797) from the AMA programme were followed during 125 days (IQR: 0-181), and adverse events (Grade 3/4) were observed in 10.1% of patients versus 13.4% in the simulated control arm. The overall cost of AE avoided was estimated to €81,113, leading to an ICER of €864.The AMA programme was shown to be cost-effective compared to a simulated control arm with no intervention.

NK cells are cytotoxic lymphocytes displaying strong antimetastatic activity. Mouse models and in vitro studies suggest a prominent role of the mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase in the control of NK cell homeostasis and antitumor functions. However, mTOR inhibitors are used as chemotherapies in several cancer settings. The impact of such treatments on patients’ NK cells is unknown. We thus performed immunophenotyping of circulating NK cells from metastatic breast cancer patients treated with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus over a three-month period. Everolimus treatment resulted in inhibition of mTORC1 activity in peripheral NK cells, whereas mTORC2 activity was preserved. NK cell homeostasis was profoundly altered with a contraction of the NK cell pool and an overall decrease in their maturation. Phenotype and function of the remaining NK cell population was less affected. This is, to our knowledge, the first in vivo characterization of the role of mTOR in human NK cells.

Background Cancer treatment is constantly evolving toward a more personalized approach based on clinical features, imaging, and genomic pathology information. To ensure the best care for patients, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) meet regularly to review cases. Notwithstanding, the conduction of MDT meetings is challenged by medical time restrictions, the unavailability of critical MDT members, and the additional administrative work required. These issues may result in members missing information during MDT meetings and postponed treatment. To explore and facilitate improved approaches for MDT meetings in France, using advanced breast cancers (ABCs) as a model, Centre Léon Bérard (CLB) and ROCHE Diagnostics cocreated an MDT application prototype based on structured data. Objective In this paper, we want to describe how an application prototype was implemented for ABC MDT meetings at CLB to support clinical decisions. Methods Prior to the initiation of cocreation activities, an organizational audit of ABC MDT meetings identified the following four key phases for the MDT: the instigation, preparation, execution, and follow-up phases. For each phase, challenges and opportunities were identified that informed the new cocreation activities. The MDT application prototype became software that integrated structured data from medical files for the visualization of the neoplastic history of a patient. The digital solution was assessed via a before-and-after audit and a survey questionnaire that was administered to health care professionals involved in the MDT. Results The ABC MDT meeting audit was carried out during 3 MDT meetings, including 70 discussions of clinical cases before and 58 such discussions after the implementation of the MDT application prototype. We identified 33 pain points related to the preparation, execution, and follow-up phases. No issues were identified related to the instigation phase. Difficulties were grouped as follows: process challenges (n=18), technological limitations (n=9), and the lack of available resources (n=6). The preparation of MDT meetings was the phase in which the most issues (n=16) were seen. A repeat audit, which was undertaken after the implementation of the MDT application, demonstrated that (1) the discussion times per case remained comparable (2 min and 22 s vs 2 min and 14 s), (2) the capture of MDT decisions improved (all cases included a therapeutic proposal), (3) there was no postponement of treatment decisions, and (4) the mean confidence of medical oncologists in decision-making increased. Conclusions The introduction of the MDT application prototype at CLB to support the ABC MDT seemed to improve the quality of and confidence in clinical decisions. The integration of an MDT application with the local electronic medical record and the utilization of structured data conforming to international terminologies could enable a national network of MDTs to support sustained improvements to patient care.

BACKGROUND Cancer treatment is constantly evolving toward a more personalized approach based on clinical features, imaging, and genomic pathology information. To ensure the best care for patients, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) meet regularly to review cases. Notwithstanding, the conduction of MDT meetings is challenged by medical time restrictions, the unavailability of critical MDT members, and the additional administrative work required. These issues may result in members missing information during MDT meetings and postponed treatment. To explore and facilitate improved approaches for MDT meetings in France, using advanced breast cancers (ABCs) as a model, Centre Léon Bérard (CLB) and ROCHE Diagnostics cocreated an MDT application prototype based on structured data. OBJECTIVE In this paper, we want to describe how an application prototype was implemented for ABC MDT meetings at CLB to support clinical decisions. METHODS Prior to the initiation of cocreation activities, an organizational audit of ABC MDT meetings identified the following four key phases for the MDT: the instigation, preparation, execution, and follow-up phases. For each phase, challenges and opportunities were identified that informed the new cocreation activities. The MDT application prototype became software that integrated structured data from medical files for the visualization of the neoplastic history of a patient. The digital solution was assessed via a before-and-after audit and a survey questionnaire that was administered to health care professionals involved in the MDT. RESULTS The ABC MDT meeting audit was carried out during 3 MDT meetings, including 70 discussions of clinical cases before and 58 such discussions after the implementation of the MDT application prototype. We identified 33 pain points related to the preparation, execution, and follow-up phases. No issues were identified related to the instigation phase. Difficulties were grouped as follows: process challenges (n=18), technological limitations (n=9), and the lack of available resources (n=6). The preparation of MDT meetings was the phase in which the most issues (n=16) were seen. A repeat audit, which was undertaken after the implementation of the MDT application, demonstrated that (1) the discussion times per case remained comparable (2 min and 22 s vs 2 min and 14 s), (2) the capture of MDT decisions improved (all cases included a therapeutic proposal), (3) there was no postponement of treatment decisions, and (4) the mean confidence of medical oncologists in decision-making increased. CONCLUSIONS The introduction of the MDT application prototype at CLB to support the ABC MDT seemed to improve the quality of and confidence in clinical decisions. The integration of an MDT application with the local electronic medical record and the utilization of structured data conforming to international terminologies could enable a national network of MDTs to support sustained improvements to patient care.

Patients with cancer are at high risk of severe or lethal COVID-19. The impact of SARS-COV-2 vaccination on the risk of developing COVID-19 was investigated in an exhaustive series of patients from a comprehensive cancer center.This is a study of the exhaustive population of 2391 cancer patients who were prescribed SARS-COV-2 vaccination until 09/21. Patient characteristics, documented SARS-COV-2 infection with RT-PCR, and survival were collected. The primary endpoint was the rate of COVID-19 after vaccination. Secondary endpoints included risk factors to develop COVID-19 after vaccination, with a comparison with the cohort of vaccinated health care workers (HCW), and risk factors for death.From January to September 2021, among 2391 patients with cancer under active treatment in whom a SARS-COV-2 vaccine was prescribed, 659 (28%), 1498 (63%) and 139 (6%) received 1, 2, and 3 doses, respectively. Ninety five patients received a single dose of vaccine after a previous COVID-19. Two thousand two hundred eighty five health care workers (HCW) received one (N = 17, 0.7%), 2-3 (N = 2026, 88.7%) vaccine doses and one dose after COVID-19 (N = 242, 10.6%). With a median follow-up of 142 and 199 days for patients and HCW, respectively. Thirty nine (1.6%) patients and 35 (1.5%) HCW developed COVID-19 after vaccination. Six of 39 cancer patients and no HCW died because ofCOVID-19 within 50 days after diagnosis. Independent risk factors for COVID-19 in vaccinated patients were age, single dose of vaccine without previous COVID-19 and anti-CD20 treatment in the last three months. Independent risk factors for death included metastatic disease, gender, cancer type, but also documented COVID-19 before vaccination.Patients receiving two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine have reduced risk of COVID-19. The risk of death of vaccinated cancer patients presenting COVID-19 remains high. COVID-19 before vaccination is associated with an increased overall risk of death.

IMPORTANCE: Endometrial cancer is often hormone-dependent and treated with aromatase inhibitors. The PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway deregulation observed in endometrial cancer drives hormonal resistance, thus supporting the rationale of combining mTOR inhibitor with endocrine therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of vistusertib in combination with anastrozole in the treatment of women with hormone receptor−positive recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: The VICTORIA study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized clinical trial that accrued 75 patients with hormone receptor−positive recurrent or metastatic endometrial cancer from 12 cancer centers in France in April 2016 to October 2019. After a safety run-in period, a Simon 2-stage design was used. Data analyses were performed from December 11, 2020, to March 11, 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to oral vistusertib (125 mg twice daily 2 days per week) and oral anastrozole (1 mg daily) in the combination vistusertib with anastrozole arm (V+A arm) or oral anastrozole alone (A arm). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was serious adverse events for the safety run-in period and progression-free rate at 8 weeks (8wk-PFR)—assessed with a blinded independent central review in phase 2. The secondary end points were objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Of the 75 patients who were randomized, 73 (median [range] age, 69.5 [37-88] y; all female) were treated: V+A arm, 49 patients; A arm, 24 patients. In the V+A arm, the 8wk-PFR was 67.3% (unilateral 95% CI, 54.7%) and in the A arm, 39.1% (unilateral 95% CI, 22.2%). No significant serious adverse events were reported during the safety run-in period (n = 6 in V+A arm). The overall response rate was 24.5% (95% CI, 13.3%-38.9%) in the V+A arm vs 17.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-38.8%) in the A arm. With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, median PFS was 5.2 (95% CI, 3.4-8.9) in the V+A arm and 1.9 (95% CI, 1.6-8.9) months in the A arm. Fatigue, lymphopenia, hyperglycemia, and diarrhea were the most common (grade ≥2) adverse events associated with vistusertib. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This multicenter, open-label, phase 1/2 randomized clinical trial demonstrated that adding vistusertib to anastrozole improved 8wk-PFR, overall response rate, and PFS for patients with endometrial cancer and had manageable adverse events. Identification of molecular subgroups would allow for more precise selection of patients who may be most likely to experience favorable outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02730923

Rationale: Patients with cancer are at high risk for severe or lethal CoVID-19. The impact of SARS-COV-2 vaccination on the risk of developing COVID-19 was investigated in an exhaustive series of patients from a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: This is a study of the exhaustive population of 2391 cancer patients who were prescribed SARS-COV-2 vaccination until 09/21. Patient characteristics, documented SARS-COV-2 infection with RT-PCR, and survival were collected. The primary endpoint was the rate of COVID-19 after vaccination. Secondary endpoints included risk factors to develop COVID-19 after vaccination, with a comparison with the cohort of vaccinated health care workers (HCW), and risk factors for death. Findings: From Jan to Sept 2021, among 2391 patients with cancer under active treatment prescribed a SARS-COV-2 vaccine, 659 (28%), 1498 (63%) and 139 (6%) received 1, 2 and 3 doses respectively. 95 patients received a single dose of vaccine after a previous COVID-19. 2285 health care workers (HCW) received one (N=17, 0.7%), 2-3 (N=2026, 88.7%) vaccine doses and one dose after COVID-19 (N=242, 10.6%). With a median follow-up of 142 days and 199 for patients and HCW respectively, 39 (1.6%) patients and 35 (1.5%) HCW developed COVID-19 after vaccination. 6 of 39 cancer patients and no HCW died of COVID-19 within 50 days after diagnosis. Independent risk factors for COVID-19 in vaccinated patients were age, single dose of vaccine and anti-CD20 treatment in the last 3 months. Independent risk factors for any cause of death included metastatic disease, gender, cancer type, but also documented COVID-19 before vaccination. Interpretation: Patients receiving two or more doses of COVID-19 vaccine have reduced risk of COVID-19. The risk of death of vaccinated cancer patients presenting COVID-19 remains high. COVID-19 before vaccination is associated with an increased overall risk of death. Funding Information: LYRICAN (INCA-DGOS-INSERM 12563), NetSARC (INCA & DGOS), InterSARC (INCA), LabEx DEvweCAN (ANR-10-LABX 0061), PIA Institut Convergence Francois Rabelais PLAsCAN (PLASCAN, 17-CONV-0002), Fondation ARC contre le Cancer, La Ligue contre le Cancer (Canopee), EURACAN (EC 739521) contributed to fund this study. Declaration of Interests: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest Ethics Approval Statement: The study was approved by the Institutional review board of the Centre Leon Berard on March 2021.

Objectives The objectives of this study were to identify actionable genomic alterations in the gynaecological subpopulation of the ProfiLER programme and to report clinical efficacy of recommended targeted treatment (RTT). Methods The ProfiLER programme (NCT01774409) is a multicentric prospective trial aiming to implement molecular profiling in patients with advanced refractory cancers. In this programme, tumour DNA is analysed by targeted next-generation sequencing (69 genes) and by whole genome array comparative genomic hybridisation. Clinical cases and genomic profiles are presented in a dedicated molecular tumour board to guide treatment strategies. We report here an analysis of patients with gynaecological cancers included in this trial. Results From February 2013 to February 2017, 309 patients with gynaecologic cancer were included; 279 (90%) had sufficient quality, and 131 patients (42.4%) had at least one actionable genomic alteration in cancer cells. Four alterations were shared by at least 3% of the patients: 27 (9.7%) PIK3CA mutations, 15 (5.4%) KRAS mutations, 11 (3.9%) ERBB2 amplifications and 9 (3.2%) CDKN2A deletions. Forty-one treatments were initiated among 39 patients (12.6% of the screened population): 8 (20%) had a partial response, and other 10 (24%) had a stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 2.7 months. The median overall survival was 15.6 months for patients who received a RTT. Conclusion Molecular profiling identified actionable alterations in 42.4% of patients with advanced refractory gynaecologic cancer, but only 12.6% were treated with a RTT. Among them, 46% derived clinical benefit (5.8% of the screened population).

International audience; Few data are currently available regarding the efficacy and safety of T-DM1 in breast cancer (BC) patients with unselected brain metastases (BM), since most clinical trials have excluded BM patients or have only included highly selected patients. HER2 + BC patients with BM treated with T-DM1 in 5 French centers were included in this retrospective study. Clinical management was performed according to the product guidelines. Efficacy was evaluated recording tumor response rates, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival, treatment compliance, and safety. Thirty nine patients received T-DM1, among whom 82 % presented with concomitant extra-cerebral disease. Median number of previous metastatic chemotherapy and HER2-directed targeted therapy regimens was 2 (range 0-8) and 1 (0-7), respectively. Thirty six patients had received BM loco-regional treatment (72 % whole-brain radiation therapy). After a median follow-up of 8.1 months (1.4-39.6), 24 patients had progressed (first site of progression: brain 14; meningeal 2; outside of the central nervous system 5; both intra- and extra-cerebral 3), 12 patients had died (disease progression), and 27 patients were still alive. Median number of T-DM1 cycles was 8 (1-43). There were 17 partial responses (44 %) and 6 patients achieved disease stabilization (59 % clinical benefit rate). Median PFS was 6.1 months (95 %CI 5.2-18.3), with one- and two-year PFS rates of 33 and 17 %, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated, without unexpected toxicities, treatment delay, or dose reduction. In this retrospective study, T-DM1 appeared to be an effective and well-tolerated therapeutic option in unselected HER2 + BC patients with BM. These findings require a prospective validation.

Importance To our knowledge, this is the first randomized trial in sex cord-stromal tumors, and it establishes weekly paclitaxel as standard-of-care therapy after platinum-based therapy in this setting. Objective To determine the efficacy of weekly paclitaxel with or without bevacizumab as treatment for relapsed sex cord-stromal tumors and evaluate whether the addition of bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel improves 6-month progression-free rate. Design, setting, and participants This open-label, academic, international, randomized phase 2 trial (ALIENOR) was conducted at 28 referral centers in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Belgium in collaboration with the Rare Tumor committee of the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup and used an adaptive bayesian design. It included 60 women with sex cord-stromal tumors that had relapsed after at least 1 platinum-based chemotherapy. Enrollment occurred from 2013 to 2016, and the final analysis database lock was on March 27, 2020 (median follow-up, 38.9 months). Interventions Participants were randomized to receive either paclitaxel (80 mg/m2, days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) alone or paclitaxel with bevacizumab (10 mg/kg, every 2 weeks) for 6 cycles followed by maintenance bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, every 3 weeks) for up to 1 year or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Crossover to bevacizumab was permitted after progression during or following paclitaxel alone. Main outcomes and measures Six-month progression-free rate. Results Sixty patients (predominantly with granulosa cell tumors) were randomized, 32 to receive single-agent paclitaxel (median [interquartile range] age at inclusion, 60 [53-64] years) and 28 to receive paclitaxel-bevacizumab (median [interquartile range] age at inclusion, 55 [47-61] years; 1 did not receive treatment). The estimated 6-month progression-free rate was 71% (95% credible interval, 55%-84%) with paclitaxel alone and 72% (95% credible interval, 55%-87%) with paclitaxel-bevacizumab. The bayesian estimate for the probability that the 6-month progression-free rate distribution was higher with the combination than with paclitaxel alone was 57%, less than the predefined superiority threshold. The objective response rate increased from 25% (95% CI, 12%-43%) to 44% (95% CI, 26%-65%) with the addition of bevacizumab. One patient discontinued combination therapy within 6 months because of toxicity. Conclusions and relevance Weekly paclitaxel is a new option for relapsed sex cord-stromal tumors. In this international randomized clinical trial of patients with relapsed sex cord-stromal tumors unsuitable for surgery, adding bevacizumab to weekly paclitaxel does not improve clinical benefit. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01770301.

Despite improvements in early detection, surgery and systemic therapy, metastatic breast cancer remains a major cause of death. Luminal type breast cancers expressing hormone estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone (PR) and without HER2 overexpression are generally sensitive to endocrine therapy, but raise the issue of the occurrence of resistance to treatment, particularly at metastatic stage. A better understanding of hormone resistance may guide the development of new therapeutics. New strategies aim at enhancing and prolonging of endocrine sensitivity, by optimizing existing schemes, or by combining an endocrine therapy with a targeted therapies specific to hormone resistance pathways: ER signaling, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and Cyclin Dependent Kinase (CDK). Key corners of 2014 include confirmation of benefit of high dose fulvestrant, and commercialization of everolimus as the first mTOR inhibitor in this indication. Other strategies are being tested dealing with new endocrine therapies or new molecular targets such as PI3K inhibitors, insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-R) and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. Coming years may be fruitful and might radically change our way to treat these patients.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a set of very heterogeneous tumors with numerous histological categories. The development of the molecular biology allowed identifying recurring molecular anomalies in certain subgroups of sarcomas, being able to represent diagnostic, prognosis and therapeutic tools. The molecular classification of STS includes until today 5 main groups of abnormalities: sarcomas with "simple genomic profile" showing reciprocal (1) chromosomal translocations, (2) activating mutation, (3) inhibitive mutation or (4) simple amplification; (5) sarcomas with "complex genomic profile" can include several tens of molecular abnormalities. The development of new-targeted therapies is based on the identification of a target, specific of a tumors subgroup and involved in carcinogenesis mechanisms and/or tumoral growth. Then, the aim of clinical research is to establish the proof of the concept through clinical trials, demonstrating the benefit brought to the patient and ending in the marketing of the drug. This proof of the concept was clearly established for imatinib, sunitinib and regorafenib in gastrointestinal stromal tumors, for imatinib in dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans and pigmented vilo-nodular synovitis, for denosumab in giant cell tumors of the bone, ending in the authorization to use these new therapies in these indications. It is in progress and promising for anti-IGF-1R in Ewing sarcomas, for crizotinib in myofibroblastic inflammatory tumors, for mTOR inhibitor in PEComas... The role of molecular abnormalities identified in the mechanisms of tumoral progress for sarcomas and their potential therapeutic impact will be detailed.

1043 Background: For ER+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer (mBC), efficacy of endocrine therapy + chemotherapy combination remain an open question. We hypothesized that continuing ER targeted therapy after progression in combination with chemotherapy may improve disease control. The objective of the CHEOPS trial was to assess the benefit of adding aromatase inhibitor (AI) to metronomic chemotherapy,oral vinorelbine, 50mg/3 time a week (OV) for AI pre-treated, ER+/HER2- mBC patients. Methods: Eligible patients had to have progressed on endocrine therapy and one or two lines of chemotherapy. They were randomized between vinorelbine (OV) and vinorelbine + AI (OV+AI). Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). To show an increase of median PFS (from 3.5 to 5.5 month, HR 0.636), with alpha = 5% and power = 80%, 130 evaluable patients were needed. Results: 121 patients were Included (OV = 61; OV+AI = 60). Median age was 68 (range: 49-87), Median time from metastatic diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 0 - 16.9). 109 patients (90%) had visceral metastases. They all had previously received an AI and had been treated with one line (N = 66, 54.5%), or 2 lines (N = 55, 45.5%) of chemotherapy. Median PFS was increased from 2.3 months with OV to 3.7 months with OV+AI, but this difference was not significant (HR 0.73 [95 % CI 0.50-1.06], log-rank test: P = 0.09) 81 patients (67%) had at least one adverse event (AE) of grade ≥ 3 (40 (66%) for OV vs 41 (68%) for OV+AI). The most common grade ≥ 3 AE were: GT gammas (23%), neutropenia (18%), arterial hypertension and lymphopenia (17%). The occurrence of 3 toxic deaths (OV = 1; OV+AI = 2) secondary to febrile aplasia motivated the early cessation of this clinical trial. 9 patients (5 OV (10%) and 4 OV+AI (8%) presented an objective complete or partial response. Conclusions: The addition of AI to OV over OV alone in AI resistant mBC was associated with a non-significant improvement of PFS, but both PFS are lower than expected. Metronomic OV schedule, at 50 mg three times a week, requires close biological monitoring. The question of hormonal treatment and chemotherapy combination remains open. Clinical trial information: EudraCT Number: 2015-000401-39.

Prevalence of brain metastases is increasing in breast cancer. Brain metastases represent a poor-prognosis disease for which local treatments continue to play a major role. In spite of the presence of a physiological blood-brain barrier limiting their activity, some systemic treatments may display a significant antitumor activity at the central nervous system level. In HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer with brain metastases not previously treated with whole brain radiotherapy, capecitabine and lapatinib combination obtains a volumetric reponse in two thirds of patients (LANDSCAPE study). If confirmed, these results could modify in selected patients the layout of therapeutic strategies. Promoting novel targeted approaches and innovative therapeutic combinations is a critical need to improve survival of breast cancer patients with brain metastases.

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are neoplasms of mesenchymal origin arising from the GI tract. These tumors are characterized by activating mutations of the receptor tyrosine kinases, either KIT or PDGFRa, which are found in 85% of cases. Despite the use of imatinib in first-line and sunitinib in second-line treatment, patients with metastatic GIST still have a high risk of progression and death. To date, the median overall survival for metastatic disease is close to 5 years. Treatment with imatinib, an inhibitor of KIT and PDGFRa, results in clinical benefit, that is, objective responses or disease stabilization in approximately 85% of patients with unresectable or metastatic GISTs. However, metastatic GIST develop resistance to imatinib at a median time of 24 months, and sometimes more than 8 years after initiation of the treatment. In addition, as many as 15% of patients do not respond initially to imatinib; therefore, novel therapeutic options, new drugs or combination are needed. Genotypic ana...

Background: Most targeted therapies in cancer have reached approval based on clinical studies performed in unselected patients. Small subsets of patients present exceptional responses (ER), which could be driven by a low level of genomic alterations in genes identified as causally implicated in cancer. Methods: This is an exploratory, multicenter, prospective trial conducted in adult patients with advanced solid cancers (breast cancer, lung adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, renal clear cell cancer, skin cutaneous melanoma) having presented an ER to an approved antineoplastic targeted therapy will be included. ER is defined using the definition chosen by the NCI which combines the three criteria: - complete or partial response, - lasting > 6 months, - and not expected in > 10% of the patients in this drug - organ situation ER will be reviewed each month by the Response Confirmation Committee composed of the study coordinators and at least one expert of each organ. The primary objective is to identify whether tumors characterized by a low level of genomic alterations are associated with ER. A low level of genomic alteration is defined by the presence of less than the 5th quantile of genomic alterations to be expected in the given tumor type. For each tumor type, it is desired to test the null hypothesis H0: π=0.05 against the one-sided alternative hypothesis π>0.05. For each of six cohorts, a sample size of 44 patients is necessary to achieve 80% power at π=15 with a one-sided level 5% test. Results: As of January 2018, 152 patients were screened in 31 French centers. Forty-seven patients were included in the study (23 patients with breast cancer, 11 patients with kidney carcinoma, 5 with melanoma, 4 with lung cancer, 3 with colorectal cancer and 1 ovarian cancer). The 5 most frequent drugs were: sunitinib, everolimus, bevacizumab, trastuzumab and pazopanib. The EXPRESS study is still recruiting. Study completion date is estimated to be in August 2019. Conclusion The identification of molecular traits associated with ER might serve the development of predictive classifiers for precision medicine. This study also represents a unique opportunity to better understand cancer biology. Citation Format: Olivia Le Saux, Antoine Italiano, Dominique Spaeth, Pierre Heudel, Thomas Filleron, Laurence Albiges, Thomas Bachelot, Anthony Gonçalves, Jean-Yves Pierga, Fabrice Barlesi, Valérie Boige, Céleste Lebbé, Laurent Mortier, Jean Sébastien Frenel, Olivier Tredan, Marta Jimenez, François Legrand, Charles Ferte. A multicenter, prospective trial in progress exploring the association between low level of genomic alteration and exceptional and unexpected response to targeted therapies in patients with solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr CT153.

Sarcomas are rare cancers with great variability in clinical and histopathological presentation. The main objective of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is to standardize diagnosis and treatment.From March 2005 to February 2007, all patients diagnosed with localized sarcoma in the Rhône-Alpes region were included in a cohort-based study, to evaluate the compliance of sarcoma management with French guidelines in routine practice and to identify predictive factors for compliance with CGPs.634 (71 %) patients with localized sarcoma satisfying the inclusion criteria were included out of 891 newly diagnosed sarcomas. Taking into account initial diagnosis until follow-up, overall conformity to CPGs was only 40 % [95 % confidence interval (CI) = 36-44], ranging from 54 % for gastrointestinal stromal tumor to 36 % for soft tissue sarcoma and 42 % for bone sarcoma. In multivariate analysis, primary tumor type [relative risk (RR) = 4.42, 95 % CI = 2.79-6.99, p0.001], dedicated multidisciplinary staff before surgery (RR = 4.19, 95 % CI = 2.39-7.35, p0.001) and management in specialized hospitals (RR = 3.71, 95 % CI = 2.43-5.66, p0.001) were identified as unique independent risk factors for conformity to CPGs for overall treatment sequence.With only 40 % of total conformity to CPGs, the conclusions support the improvement of initial sarcoma management and its performance in specialized centres or within specialized dedicated networks.

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in women and 70% of the cases are hormone-dependent. The presence of ERα is one of the most important prognostic factors predictive of response to endocrine therapy in human breast cancers. Resistance to endocrine therapies has become a major public health concern and it appears essential to understand the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. This review provides insights into the molecular mechanisms associated with resistance to endocrine therapies and presents the different strategies currently developed in pre-clinical models to overcome this resistance.

The aim of the study was to analyze in breast tumors the correlation between [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake assessed by positron emission tomography (PET) and histopathological and immunohistochemical prognostic factors.FDG-PET combined with computed tomography (CT) was performed before surgery in 45 women with biopsy-proven primary breast cancer. The standardized uptake value (SUV) was compared with histopathological findings after surgery.A positive relationship was found between SUV and histological grade (p0.0001), histological type (p = 0.001), tumor size (p0.0435), estrogen receptor status (p0.0005), and progesterone receptor status (p = 0.002). FDG-PET/CT revealed unknown distant metastatic lesions in 2 of 12 patients with triple-negative breast cancer. The sensitivity of FDG-PET/CT for detecting axillary lymph node metastases was, respectively, 21% and 100% for pN1 and pN2 cases, whereas specificity was 100% for pN0.SUV, a preoperative and noninvasive metabolic parameter, correlates with other known prognostic factors in breast cancer. This study provides valuable insight into the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT for preoperative staging of patients with triple-negative and poorly differentiated breast tumors but not for evaluating axillary lymph nodes and lobular carcinomas.

We report on a 71-year-old woman with parapharyngeal sarcoma. Surgery could not be performed because of the size and location of the tumor. After failure of four cycles of chemotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) achieved complete clinical response and partial magnetic resonance imaging response (80%) at 24 months of follow-up. The results of radiotherapy, especially IMRT, for nonresectable head and neck soft tissue sarcoma are discussed.

Introduction: We previously showed that T ( Methods: Lymphocytes, NK, monocytes and DC subpopulations quantification and functional competence after reactivation (PMA/ionomycin, TLR7/8-Ligand) were assessed by multiparametric flow-cytometry (surface markers/ intracytoplasmic cytokines) on fresh whole blood (D0, D21, D57, D78, EOS). Impact of CYT107 treatment before (D0-D21) or during (D57-D78) chemotherapy on immune parameters was assessed. Results: At inclusion, 20 patients presented strong quantitative alteration of all lymphocytes subsets compared to a healthy donor women cohort (n=30). Inflammatory monocytes (infl-Mo) and DC subsets were quantitatively reduced. CD4 CD45R0+ T (IFNγ/IL-2), Tγδ cells and NK (IFNγ) cytokine productions were altered independently of quantitative alterations highlighting the importance to assess both. Pre-chemotherapy, CYT107 significantly increased CD3 T cell absolute number (median relative evolution: CYT107+128.5%[39;606cells/µL] vs placebo +1.6%[-34;85cells/µL], p=0.002) involving both CD4 (p=0.002) or CD8 (p=0.006) T cells and naïve (CD4:p=0.005 and CD8:p Conclusion: CYT107 administered before chemotherapy, increases all T cell subsets absolute number but no other compartments without affecting their functional responses. Interestingly, during chemotherapy, CYT107 induces an increase of CD8 memory cells, known to play a role in long lasting defense against tumors. Citation Format: Christine Menetrier-Caux, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Claire Cropet, Estelle Verronese, Thomas Bachelot, Olivier Tredan, Gwenaelle Garin, Pierre Heudel, Axelle N'Kodia, Ana Delgado, Christine Bardin-Dit-Courageot, Chantal Rigal, Gilles Clapisson, Sylvie Chabaud, David Perol, Paul Rebattu, Thérèse Croughs, Nicolas Pasqual, Manuarii Manuel, Michel Morre, Jean-Yves Blay, Christophe Caux. Interleukin-7 (CYT107) treatment in lymphopenic 1st line metastatic breast carcinoma patients treated with chemotherapy regimen (Capecitabine) favors the restoration of T-cell subsets number. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 105th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2014 Apr 5-9; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2014;74(19 Suppl):Abstract nr 2574. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2014-2574

3033 Background: Lymphopenia is an independent predictive and prognostic factor for chemotherapy (CT)-induced death, febrile neutropenia, overall survival and progression in several cancers, includ...

180 Background: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma remains resistant to many key cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and novel targeted therapies. The molecular heterogeneity of this cancer may account for therapy failures to date, although the growing arsenal of novel targeted agents could translate into patient survival. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular features of advanced disease will afford new opportunities for investigation, therapeutic intervention and clinical management of patients afflicted with pancreatic cancer. Methods: Data of 46 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were analyzed. The clinicopathological parameters, the histologic features were determined and correlated to the stage at initial diagnosis and patterns of failure (locally advanced v metastatic disease). Using tissue microarray, we assessed the relationship of SMAD4 expression with the overall survival of patients. Results: Among the 46 treated patients, 32 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. 40% of patients died with metastatic disease and 15 % died with locally advance evolution. Loss of SMAD4 expression was found in 22% of patients and seems to be correlated with a high grade histologic features and progression to metastasis disease. Complementary data about correlation between the mutational status of SMAD4 and survival will be presented during congress. Conclusions: SMAD4 gene inactivation seems to be associated with poorer prognosis and disease progression. Prospective validation of SMAD4 as a predictive biomarker may personalize treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Pazopanib is a multikinase inhibitor which potently inhibits the activity of major receptor tyrosine kinases, including vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a, platelet-derived growth factor receptor-a, and c-Kit. Approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2009 in the United States for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma, pazopanib has been tested in advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. Unlike other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, a statistically significant efficacy in phase II but also in randomized phase III studies has been shown. In comparison with sunitinib or sorafenib, pazopanib has a similar toxicity profile and is generally well tolerated. This review details the development of this new therapeutic class in the treatment of metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas.

10562 Background: Lymphopenia (33% or both, in cohort A (median OS: 7.6 vs 24.5 months, p.value =0.0006) and cohort B (median OS 10.6 vs 22.9 months, p.value =0.0035). In a multivariate analysis, including all significant clinical factors from the univariate analysis (PS, liver metastasis, hemoglobin) lympho-divpenia was found to be an independent prognostic factor in the pooled cohort (A+B) (p=0.005) along with triple negative tumors (p=0.011) and hemoglobin level (11.5 g/dL) (p=0.009). Conclusions: NDL score combining lymphopenia and reduced TCR diversity seems to be a strong prognostic factor for OS and could be use to improve care quality of MBC patients.

e14730 Background: Pancreatic cancer remains resistant to many key cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and novel targeted therapies. The molecular heterogeneity of this cancer may account for therapy failures to date, although the growing arsenal of novel targeted agents could translate into patient survival. A better understanding of the cellular and molecular features of advanced disease will afford new opportunities for investigation, therapeutic intervention and clinical management of patients afflicted with pancreatic cancer. Methods: This study examined the expression profiles of Smad4 in 45 samples of surgically resected pancreatic cancer. Of these 45 patients, 32 underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy. The clinicopathological parameters, the histologic features were determined and correlated to the stage at initial diagnosis, patterns of failure (locally advanced v metastatic disease) and the status SMAD4 genes. Results: Among the 45 patients, 40% of patients died with metastatic disease and 15 % died with locally advanced evolution. SMAD4 genetic status was determined in 25 patients and seems to be correlated with a high grade histologic features and progression to metastasis. Complementary data about correlation between the mutational status of SMAD4 and survival will be presented during congress. Conclusions: SMAD4 gene inactivation seems to be associated with poorer prognosis and disease progression. Prospective validation of SMAD4 as a predictive biomarker may personalize treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer.

10581 Background: Liposarcoma (LPS) represents the most common soft-tissue sarcoma.The aim of this prospective and exhaustive population-based study is to explore the impact of medical practices co...