Search

Background The surgical management of concomitant occurrence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and colorectal cancer (CRC) is still controversial. Conversely, benefits from a minimally invasive approach are well known concerning the treatment of both AAA and CRC. The aim of this study is to assess safety and feasibility of a sequential 2-staged minimally invasive during the same recovery by endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) technique and laparoscopic colorectal resection. Methods From January 2008 to December 2020, all patients with concomitant AAA and CRC were consecutively treated by EVAR and laparoscopic colorectal resection. Perioperative data were retrospectively collected in order to evaluate short- and long-term outcomes following the sequential 2-staged procedures. Results A total of 24 patients were included. The localization of the aneurysm was infrarenal abdominal aortic in 23 cases and in one case of common iliac artery. EVAR procedure has always been performed first. In 18 patients, a percutaneous access has been used while in 6 patients a surgical access has been adopted. Twelve patients had cancer in the left colon, 9 in the right colon, and 3 patients had rectal cancer. No conversions or intraoperative complications had occurred during laparoscopic surgery. The major complications rate after EVAR and CRC surgery was 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively. The mean interval between EVAR and CRC treatment was 7.8 ± 1 and the mean length of stay was 15.4 ± 3.6. No deaths occurred during hospitalization and between the procedures. Overall mortality was 20.8% with a mean follow-up of 39.41 ± 19.2 months. Conclusion Elective sequential 2-staged minimally invasive treatment is a safe and feasible approach with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and it should be adopted in current clinical practice to manage concomitant AAA and CRC.

Highlights • Multilevel peripheral arterial disease in diabetic patients is cause of amputation. • Herein we report a case of critic limb ischemia addressed by hybrid procedure. • Hybrid procedure outcomes seem to be as good as with open revascularization. • Hybrid procedure show less morbidity and shorter intensive care and hospital stay., Introduction Multilevel peripheral arterial disease (MPAD) is the main cause of critic limb ischemia (CLI). Vascular interventions are required to increase distal blood flow and reduce the risk of lower limb amputation. Presentation of case We report a case of complex hybrid revascularization in a patient presenting a Rutherford V MPAD involving the infrarenal aorta, iliac, femoral and popliteal segments. The simultaneous hybrid intervention consisted of an endovascular aortic stent-graft placement and a surgical above-the-knee prosthetic femoro-popliteal bypass. In the same operation a renal stenting was performed due to a significant renal artery stenosis associated to a systemic hypertension non-responder to medical management. Discussion Hybrid interventions can be performed simultaneously or staged with benefit given by the complementary role of endovascular and surgical treatments allowing the correction of eventually inadequate results of both approaches. Reports of simultaneous hybrid treatments are limited but, despite the complexity of such procedures, primary success rate is reported high. Also in the reported case, a complex simultaneous treatment in a patient presenting MPAD in association to a significant and symptomatic renal artery disease was feasible in the same operation. Conclusion Hybrid procedure are safe with high degree of efficacy in terms of revascularization procedure, reduced morbidity and shorter intensive care and hospital stay. In our experience, the use of hybrid procedure is technically feasible and allowed the treatment of MPAD with a good outcomes.

A 67-year-old man with pain in his right flank and hematuria over the last few weeks was admitted to our hospital due to right renal calculi revealed by an ultrasound examination of the urinary tract. An abdominal x-ray drew attention to the presence of structures of an uncertain interpretation, that mimicked multiple calculi in the right kidney and renal pelvis, but CT-scan identified a large saccular aneurysm of 76 mm with renal pelvis involvement and urinary statis of the right renal artery. A combined endovascular and laparoscopic surgical approach was chosen. The patient underwent endovascular embolization of the renal artery with an Amplatzer Vascular Plug followed by a video laparoscopic nephrectomy. After few days of hospitalization, the patient was in good general status and was discharged. A review of the literature has highlighted the unicity of our surgical approach, especially within the context of traditional vascular and general surgical practice, due to multidisciplinary consultation.

Extracranial carotid artery aneurysms (ECAAs) are not a common occurrence. As a result, its natural clinical course and the risk factors associated with an adverse outcome are largely unknown. Herein, we describe the endovascular treatment of two extracranial carotid artery aneurysms with flow diverter stents. Flow-diverter devices are stents placed in the parent artery at the level of the neck aneurysm in order to disrupt the intra-aneurysmal flow, thereby favoring intra-aneurysmal thrombosis. In the first case, an angio-CT scan was performed at one-month follow-up and in the second case a duplex scan was performed after four months. Both cases resulted in good stent positioning with complete exclusion of the aneurysm and complete carotid artery patency. Based upon our own clinical experience, endovascular treatment with flow diverter stents merit to be recognized and considered an option in cases of ECAA acknowledging that larger studies or larger series are needed to concur experience.