Search

Aims Limited data are available on prognostic indicators for HIV patients presenting with ACS. Methods and results Data on consecutive patients with HIV infection receiving standard highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) presenting with ACS between January 2001 and September 2012 were collected. Cardiac death and myocardial infarction (MI) were the primary end-points. 10,050 patients with ACS were screened, and among them a total of 201 patients (179 [89%] males and a median age of 53 [47-62] years) were included, 48% of them admitted for ST-elevation myocardial infarction and 14% having left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) at discharge. CD4+ counts less than 200 cells/mm 3 were reported in 18 patients (9%), and 136 patients (67%) were treated with nucleoside-reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). After a median of 24months (10–41), 30 patients (15%) died, 12 (6%) for cardiac reasons, 20 (10%) suffered a MI, 29 (15%) a subsequent revascularization, and 7 (3%) a stent thrombosis. Other than LVSD (hazard ratio=6.4 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6-26: p=0.009]), the only other independent predictor of cardiac death was not being treated with NRTI (hazard ratio=9.9 [95% CI: 2.1-46: p=0.03); a CD4 cell count 3 was the only predictor of MI (hazard ratio=5.9 [95% CI: 1.4-25: p=0.016]). Conclusions HIV patients presenting with ACS are at significantly increased risk for cardiac death if not treated with NRTI, and at significantly increased risk of MI if their CD4 cell count is 3 , suggesting that the stage of HIV disease (and lack of NRTI treatment) may contribute to cardiovascular instability.

Novel agents in combination with melphalan and prednisone (MP) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in multiple myeloma (MM). Randomized trials comparing MP plus bortezomib (VMP) versus MP plus thalidomide (MPT) are lacking. Nine hundred and fifty-six elderly (>65 years) newly diagnosed MM patients from six European randomized trials were retrospectively analyzed and matched for age, albumin, and beta2-microglobulin at diagnosis, 296 patients were selected from the VMP groups, and 294 from MPT. Complete response rate was 21% in the VMP patients and 13% in the MPT patients (P=0.007). After a median follow-up of 34 months (range, 1-92), VMP significantly prolonged both PFS (median 32.5 vs. 22.9 months, HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.52-0.82; P

The introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES) has markedly improved mid-term results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in diabetics. However, it is unclear whether the risk-benefit balance of DES in diabetics is maintained also at long-term and in insulin-requiring patients. We thus aimed to appraise long-term outcomes of diabetic patients treated with PCI with DES, stratifying according to insulin therapy.We retrospectively collected baseline, procedural and outcome data from all patients undergoing PCI with DES from July 2002 to June 2004 at our center. We distinguished three groups: insulin-requiring diabetics, non-insulin-requiring diabetics and patients without diabetes. The primary end-point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization). We also considered stent thrombosis according to the Academic Research Consortium Definition.We included a total of 1266 patients, with 3% of insulin-requiring diabetes, 22% with non-insulin-requiring diabetes, and 75% without diabetes. There were significant differences across groups in prevalence of male gender (respectively, 32.4%, 74.6% and 81%, P0.001), and DES usage (54.1%, 34%, and 30.4%, P=0.007). Thirty-day MACE occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (8.1%, 7.3% and 6.3%, P=0.78), with death in 3%, 2%, and 1.4% (P=0.71) and myocardial infarction in 5.4%, 1.8% and 0.8% (P=0.02). After a median follow-up period of 58 months, MACE occurred in 59.5% of patients with insulin-requiring diabetes, in 50.6% of non-insulin-requiring diabetics and in 38.9% of non-diabetics (P0.001). Death occurred in 24.3%, 17.5% and 8.5%, (P0.001), myocardial infarction in 10.8%, 6.6%, and 5.1% (P=0.25), repeat revascularization in 46%, 31.6%, and 30% (P=0.11), and definite stent thrombosis in 0%, 1.1%, and 1.3% (P=0.78).Our study confirms the high risk profile of diabetic patients, especially when ischemic disease it is known. In this setting, diabetic and comorbidities fix the price not only in term of need of further revascularization, but mainly in survival decrease. It can be concluded that not only revascularization but also ‑ and especially ‑ comorbidities treatment plays a determinant role reducing follow-up events. Further research on additional pharmacologic treatments or hybrid revascularization strategies may mitigate the burden of morbidity and mortality.

Percutaneous drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation is commonly used in patients with unprotected left main (ULM) disease. As this procedure has been performed routinely in Turin Center since 2002, this article aimed to summarize a five year-experience in DES implantation in the ULM.Baseline, procedural and in-hospital outcome data of all patients with ULM undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES between July 2002 and October 2006 at Turin Center have been collected. Patients were randomized into four groups: A (patients treated between July 2002 and December 2003), B (treated in 2004), C (treated in 2005) and D (treated in 2006). The baseline surgical risk features was to be compared with the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, disease location in the ULM, and in-hospital major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, repeat percutaneous revascularization, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, or stent thrombosis.Out of a total of 4 432 coronary interventional procedures 198 patients treated with DES in the ULM were identified. There was a significant increase in the number of patients treated (P=0.00095), but no difference in EuroSCORE across groups (P=0.14). Conversely, there was a significant temporal trend in the incidence of bifurcational ULM being treated with DES (P=0.03). Intriguingly, despite this increase in adverse lesion characteristics, no significant increase was found in the rate of in-hospital MACCE (P=0.93).In this single-center study, the number of patients being treated with DES for ULM disease has risen across the years, although keeping a similar surgical risk profile. Distal ULM involvement is no longer considered an absolute contraindication to PCI, as testified by the increasing frequency of such lesion among patients undergoing DES implantation at this Institution, with remarkably low rates of adverse events.

Purpose Lenalidomide has shown significant antimyeloma activity in clinical studies. Oral melphalan, prednisone, and thalidomide have been regarded as the standard of care in elderly multiple myeloma patients. We assessed dosing, efficacy, and safety of melphalan, prednisone, and lenalidomide (MPR) in newly diagnosed elderly myeloma patients. Patients and Methods Oral melphalan was administered in doses ranging from 0.18 to 0.25 mg/kg on days 1 to 4, prednisone at a 2-mg/kg dose on days 1 to 4, and lenalidomide at doses ranging from 5 to 10 mg on days 1 to 21, every 28 days for nine cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with lenalidomide alone. Aspirin was given as a prophylaxis for thrombosis. Results Fifty-four patients were enrolled and evaluated after completing the assigned treatment schedule. The maximum tolerated dose was defined as 0.18 mg/kg melphalan and 10 mg lenalidomide. With these doses, 81% of patients achieved at least a partial response, 47.6% achieved a very good partial response, and 23.8% achieved a complete immunofixation-negative response. In all patients, 1-year event-free and overall survival rates were 92% and 100%, respectively. At the maximum tolerated dose, grade 3 adverse events included neutropenia (38.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.2%), febrile neutropenia (9.5%), vasculitis (9.5%), and thromboembolism (4.8%); grade 4 adverse events were neutropenia (14.2%) and thrombocytopenia (9.5%). Conclusion Oral MPR therapy is a promising first-line treatment for elderly myeloma patients. Hematologic adverse events were frequent but manageable. A low incidence of nonhematologic adverse events was noted. Aspirin appears to provide adequate antithrombosis prophylaxis.

The morbidity and mortality burden of heart valve disease is increasing in the developing world, especially among the elderly. Whereas surgery remains the standard of care in fit patients with degenerative aortic stenosis, percutaneous aortic valve replacement could become an effective alternative to surgery in selected higher risk patients. The authors report on two women with aortic stenosis, both at high surgical risk (an 81-year-old female with coronary artery and cerebro-vascular disease, and a 70-year-old female with end-stage cirrhosis), in whom percutaneous valve replacement was effectively performed by means of transfemoral access and retrograde CoreValve Re-valving System implantation. Two major post-procedural complications occurred, both effectively managed, in the second patient: a third degree atrio-ventricular block (requiring permanent pace-maker implantation) and bleeding from the right femoral artery access (requiring implantation of two covered stents and blood transfusion). Despite the increased baseline risk, both patients were discharged asymptomatic, the first twelve days and the other three weeks after admission. In the authors' experience percutaneous aortic valve replacement can be performed with reasonable safety in patient with severe aortic stenosis at high surgical risk.

Elevated values of systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) represent a common finding in patients with aortic stenosis and severe left ventricular hypertrophy. Prognostic impact of sPAP and its potential improvement after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains to be determined.This is a multicenter retrospective registry in five European institutions. All consecutive patients undergoing TAVI were enrolled, and divided into two groups according to sPAP evaluated with echocardiography: ≤40 mm Hg and40 mm Hg. All-cause mortality at follow-up of at least 1 year was the primary endpoint, while 30-day mortality, periprocedural complications, myocardial infarction, stroke, and reintervention rates at follow-up were the secondary endpoints. Among 674 patients enrolled, a total of 319 (47%) had sPAP40 mm Hg. This was associated with higher mortality at 30 days (4.5% vs 8.5%; P=.03) and at a median follow-up of 477 days (17% vs 26%; P=.03). Improvement of sPAP was reported in 113 patients (27%), occurring more frequently in absence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation and of right ventricle dysfunction. With multivariate adjustment, reduced renal function, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and sPAP40 mm Hg were independent predictors of all-cause mortality, improvement in sPAP values was related to a better survival, while ejection fraction was not.Elevated values of sPAP represent a common finding in patients undergoing TAVI. This parameter, along with its improvement, may be used to stratify risk and determine prognosis for patients undergoing TAVI.

Few clinical data about indications and prognoses of patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) in the transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) era have been reported.Data from all consecutive patients undergoing BAV in seven European centers from 2006 to 2013 were collected. Acute results and long-term outcomes were assessed.A total of 811 patients aged 82 ± 9 years were included; 416 patients (51%) underwent BAV as palliative destination therapy, 320 patients (40%) as bridge to TAVI, and 75 patients (9%) as bridge to surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). Patients undergoing BAV as destination therapy had a higher risk profile (logistic EuroSCORE, 20 ± 17 vs 22 ± 14 vs 11 ± 8, respectively; P.001). Post procedure, peak gradient decreased from 87 ± 22 mm Hg to 66 ± 22 mm Hg (P.001) and aortic valve area increased from 0.61 ± 0.2 cm2 to 0.8 ± 0.2 cm2 (P.001). At 30 days, the all-cause death rate (6.5% vs 6.2% vs 7.4%, respectively; P=.56) and the rate of life-threatening and major bleedings (8.0% vs 5.7% vs 6.0%, respectively) did not differ between groups. After a mean follow-up of 318 days (range, 116-500 days), rates of all-cause death were similar (30% vs 34% vs 31%, respectively; P.99), although patients undergoing BAV as bridge to SAVR showed a lower cardiovascular death rate (11% vs 11% vs 3%, respectively; P=.04).In the TAVI era, BAV may represent a reasonable option for patients with severe aortic stenosis and temporary contraindications to definite therapy. Given the mortality rates at 30 days, patients should be carefully selected, while events at follow-up are deeply influenced by the decision of whether or not subsequent interventions are performed.

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of chronic total occlusions (CTO) is common even with concomitant multivessel disease. We aimed to investigate the impact of multivessel disease on long-term outcome after PCI for CTO.We collected baseline, procedural and follow-up data on patients undergoing successful PCI with stenting for CTO. We divided our population into three groups: patients with 1 vessel disease (1VD), those with 2-vessel disease (2VD) and subjects with 3-vessel disease (3VD). The primary end-point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE), i.e. death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization.A total of 111 patients were included: 24 (21%) in group 1VD, 28 (25%) in group 2VD, and 59 (53%) in group 3VD. Clinical follow-up was available in 109 (98%) of them after a median of 27 months (range 6-68), yielding MACE rates of 1 (4%) in group 1VD, 5 (18%) in group 2VD, and 17 (29%) in group 3VD, respectively (P=0.03). No statistically significant difference was found comparing the 3 groups for the individual rates of death, myocardial infarction or target vessel revascularization (all P0.05). No case of definite or probable stent thrombosis was adjudicated, despite use of DES in 99 (89%) patients.Patients with diffuse coronary disease undergoing PCI for a CTO fare a significantly worse prognosis. Nonetheless, despite liberal use of DES, stent thrombosis is rare in this setting, without differences according to the initial severity of disease, thus supporting the long-term safety of DES, even if used in this "off-label" context.

Patients with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) represent a sizable portion of those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): in many instances, it is unclear whether performing PCI on the bypass graft or in the native coronary vessels can offer the best risk-benefit balance.We included patients with prior CABG undergoing PCI at our center between July 2002 and June 2004 and we distinguished them in three groups. Those in whom PCI was performed on stenotic saphenous vein graft (SVG group), those in whom PCI was performed on native vessels despite the presence of potentially treatable SVG disease (optional native group), and those in whom PCI had to be performed mandatorily in the native vessels because of chronic SVG occlusions or disease in non-bypassed segments (mandatory native group). The primary end-point was long-term rate of major adverse clinical events (MACE, i.e. death, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization).We identified 109 patients: 28 were in the SVG group, 25 in the optional native group, and 56 in the mandatory native group. Early major adverse cardiac events (MACE) occurred with similar frequency in the three groups (respectively, 9.1%, 0% and 5.7%, P=0.35). After more than three years of follow-up, MACE occurred in 39.3% vs. 28 and 39.4% (P=0.59), death occurred in 27.2 vs. 24.0% vs. 13.5% (P=0.30), and TVR in 27.3% vs. 8.0% vs. 28.8% (P=0.14).In selected patients, PCI of native coronary vessels despite the presence of apparently treatable SVG lesions can be envisioned.

There is a lack of data on clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with ultrathin stents on unprotected left main (ULM) coronary artery comparing women and men.All patients treated with ULM-PCI with ultrathin stents (struts ≤81 μm) enrolled in the RAIN-CARDIOGROUP VII study were analyzed according to a sex-assessment evaluation. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE, a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, target-lesion revascularization [TLR], and stent thrombosis) was the primary endpoint, whereas single components of MACE were the secondary endpoints.Out of a cohort of 793 patients, a total of 172 women (21.7%) and 621 men (78.3%) were included. Compared with men, women were older and less frequently smokers, had more frequently a history of previous PCI, and presented more frequently with an acute coronary syndrome. Among women, ostial lesions were more prevalent and mean stent diameter was lower compared with men. After 13.4 months (range, 8.4-21.6 months), 32 women (18.6%) and 106 men (17.1%) experienced MACE (P=.64). Censoring follow-up data at 3 years, no differences were observed in MACE (16.9 vs 14.7 per 100•patient-years; log-rank P=.61) and their single components between women and men. At multivariate analysis, chronic kidney disease (hazard ratio [HR], 1.91: 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.23 to -2.95; P.01) and acute coronary syndrome presentation (HR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.22-2.77; P=.01) were independent predictors of MACE overall. Larger stent size (HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P.01) and longer dual-antiplatelet therapy duration (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-0.99; P=.03) were associated with a reduced risk of MACE during the subsequent follow-up.Ultrathin stents offer low rates of MACE and TLR in the overall population without significant differences between sexes.

Stent thrombosis is a major safety issue after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation and it is associated with major early and mid-term complications. However, its long-term impact has been incompletely described. We thus aimed to appraise incidence, predictors and very long-term outlook of stent thrombosis after bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation.We identified all patients undergoing PCI with BMS or DES at our center between July 2002 and June 2004. For the purpose of this study, we employed a composite definition of stent thrombosis including any Academic Research Consortium stent thromboses (definite, probable, or possible). We adjudicated the following clinical events: death, myocardial infarction (stent thrombosis related), repeated revascularization, and the composite of these events (i.e., major adverse cardiac events, MACE).A total of 1112 patients were included, 854 (76.8%) treated with BMS and 258 (23.2%) treated with DES. At a median follow-up of 61.2 (11.03) months the incidence of stent thrombosis was 20 (1.8%), with 14 (1.3%) definite, 4 (0.4%) probable, and 2 (0.1%) possible according to the American Research Consortium statement. Patients developing stent thrombosis were more likely to have more complex angiographic features at baseline (including angiographically evident thrombus, 4 [20%] vs. 73 [6.6%], P=0.02) and a saphenous vein graft as target vessel (2 [10%] vs. 28 [2.5%], P=0.04). Conversely, being treated with a BMS or a DES did not confer any significant decrease or increase in the risk of stent thrombosis, as 7 [35%] of those with stent thrombosis had received at least a DES vs. 251 [22.9%] of those without stent thrombosis, P=0.28). Early clinical outcomes (at 30 days) distinguishing those with stent thrombosis versus those without were as follows: death in four (20%) vs. 2 (0.2%, P0.001), myocardial infarction in 1 (5%) vs. 7 (0.6%, P=0.02), revascularization in 5 (25%) vs. 43 (3.9%, P0.001), and MACE in 8 (40%) vs. 53 (4.8%, P0.001). After more than 60 months of clinical follow-up, outcomes were as follows: death in 7 (35%) vs. 147 (13.5%, P=0.057), myocardial infarction in 6 (30%) vs. 40 (3.6%, P0.001), revascularization in 15 (75%) vs. 317 (29%, P0.001), and MACE in 19 (95%) vs. 453 (41.5%, P0.001).This long-term registry shows that stent thrombosis remains a major safety issue after PCI with stent implantation, with a significant prognostic impact. However, in the present work the risk of stent thrombosis was similar with either DES or BMS, suggesting thus that DES are not associated with any increase in long-term thrombotic risk in comparison to BMS.

Coronary artery disease represents the most important cause of mortality and morbidity in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Despite continuous improvements in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CKD is still associated with more adverse events after PCI. We performed a retrospective study to compare bare metal stents (BMS) versus drug eluting stents (DES) in CKD.We included consecutively all patients undergoing PCI at our Centre from July 2002 to December 2005 with CKD, defined as creatinine clearance60 mL/min. Patients who received only DES were compared to those who received only BMS. The primary end-point was the long-term rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE, i.e. the composite of death, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization).We included a total of 219 patients with CKD out of a total of 2354 patients, with 164 receiving BMS and 55 DES. After a mean follow up of 48 months, the MACE rate was significantly higher in BMS group (71% versus 38%, P0.001). A similarly increased risk with BMS was found for death (45% versus 17%, P0.001), whereas the rates for repeat coronary revascularization, myocardial infarction and stent thrombosis were not significantly different. Multivariable analysis showed that BMS vs.. DES implantation was not statistically significant associated with MACE, death, myocardial infarction, rePTCA or stent thrombosis.Compared with BMS, use of DES in patients with CKD is safe and effective in reducing adverse outcomes. However, differences found between groups in clinical end-point could be ascribed to selection bias and confounding factors.