Search

Two or more cases of sarcoidosis in one family is not unusual. To compare the frequencies of familial sarcoidosis in Finland and Hokkaido, Japan, and to analyse the type of associations reported, we collected data on all patients visiting hospitals for sarcoidosis in 1984 in Finland (1378 patients) and Hokkaido (208 patients), including information about familial sarcoidosis. We also analysed the familial cases seen among 571 sarcoidosis patients diagnosed at the Mjölbolsta hospital in Finland from 1955 to 1987 and among 686 Japanese patients seen in Sapporo from 1964 to 1988.In 1984, 50 sarcoidosis patients visiting Finnish hospitals and nine sarcoidosis patients in Hokkaido reported as familial cases. Of the sarcoidosis patients seen in Finland at the Mjolbolsta hospital in 1955–1987, 27 had a family member with the same disease, while this number was 20 in the Sapporo hospital in 1964–1988.Those surveys give a prevalence of familial sarcoidosis in Finland of 3·6–4·7% and in Hokkaido of 2·9–4·3%. Among familial cases, the dominating relationships were sister–brother and mother–child relationships.

We compared the clinical picture of sarcoidosis in patients diagnosed at Mjolbolsta hospital in Finland in 1955-1987 with those diagnosed in Sapporo in 1964-1988. The female:male ratios showed a slight female predominance. The mean age (SD) at diagnosis was 41.5 (13.0) years at Mjolbolsta and 30.0 (15.4) years in Sapporo. In both series, half of the patients had been detected at mass x-ray surveys. The presenting symptoms varied considerably among the symptomatic patients. At Mjolbolsta hospital, 189 patients (33%) had cough, 21% fever, 21% general malaise, 18% dyspnoea, 18% erythema nodosum, 16% joint pain and only 27 patients (5%) had eye symptoms. In Sapporo, 245 patients (41%) had eye symptoms, 18 (4%) had enlarged peripheral lymph nodes, 14 (3%) had cough, 10 (2%) had fever. Erythema nodosum did not occur as a presenting symptom in Sapporo. The chest radiographs showed bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL, stage I) in 48% of the Mjolbolsta patients and in 57% of the Sapporo patients. Stage II lesions were seen in 39% and 20%, and stage III lesions in 12% and 5% respectively. Only 1% had a normal chest radiograph at Mjolbolsta hospital as compared with 18% in Sapporo. The Sapporo patients were more obstructive but the proportion of smokers was also higher. No difference in diffusion capacity was seen.