1. Comparison of time to recurrent biliary obstruction between plastic stents and metallic stents for endoscopic ultrasound‑guided biliary drainage
- Author
-
Sugimoto, Mitsuru, Takagi, Tadayuki, Suzuki, Rei, Waragai, Yuichi, Konno, Naoki, Asama, Hiroyuki, Sato, Yuki, Irie, Hiroki, Nakamura, Jun, Takasumi, Mika, Hashimoto, Minami, Kato, Tsunetaka, Kobashi, Ryoichiro, Yanagita, Takumi, Hikichi, Takuto, and Ohira, Hiromasa
- Subjects
Cancer Research ,Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous) ,Articles ,General Medicine - Abstract
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage (EUS-BD) may prevent stent placement at the bile duct stricture. Therefore, whether a plastic stent (PS) or metallic stent (MS) should be used for EUS-BD remains to be undetermined. The present study aimed to clarify whether a PS or MS was more efficient for EUS-BD. Patients with malignant biliary obstruction who were successfully treated with EUS-BD were enrolled in the present study. The clinical characteristics, procedural outcomes and time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) were compared between patients treated with a PS (PS group) and patients treated with an MS (MS group). Consequently, 28 patients underwent PS placement and 11 patients underwent MS placement. In the PS group, 12 patients also underwent EUS-antegrade stenting (AGS) using an MS. The TRBO was not significantly different between the two groups (P=0.25). When the patients with AGS were excluded, the TRBO was significantly longer in the MS group than in the PS group (P=0.036). However, the TRBO was not significantly different between the patients in the MS group and those in the PS group who underwent AGS (P=0.61). In EUS-BD, MS is expected to be associated with a longer TRBO than PS. However, combining EUS-BD with AGS may help overcome the shorter TRBO associated with the use of PS.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF