1. A System for True and False Memory Prediction Based on 2D and 3D Educational Contents and EEG Brain Signals
- Author
-
Bamatraf, Saeed, Hussain, Muhammad, Aboalsamh, Hatim, Qazi, Emad-Ul-Haq, Malik, Amir Saeed, Amin, Hafeez Ullah, Mathkour, Hassan, Muhammad, Ghulam, and Imran, Hafiz Muhammad
- Subjects
Male ,Support Vector Machine ,Computer science ,Speech recognition ,False memory ,Electroencephalography ,computer.software_genre ,Brain mapping ,0302 clinical medicine ,Discriminative model ,Brain Mapping ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Long-term memory ,General Neuroscience ,05 social sciences ,Brain ,050301 education ,General Medicine ,Memory, Short-Term ,Pattern Recognition, Visual ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,Female ,Research Article ,Adult ,Adolescent ,Article Subject ,General Computer Science ,General Mathematics ,Repression, Psychology ,Short-term memory ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,Machine learning ,lcsh:RC321-571 ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,medicine ,Humans ,Learning ,lcsh:Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,Recall ,business.industry ,Brain Waves ,Support vector machine ,ROC Curve ,Mental Recall ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,0503 education ,computer ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
We studied the impact of 2D and 3D educational contents on learning and memory recall using electroencephalography (EEG) brain signals. For this purpose, we adopted a classification approach that predicts true and false memories in case of both short term memory (STM) and long term memory (LTM) and helps to decide whether there is a difference between the impact of 2D and 3D educational contents. In this approach, EEG brain signals are converted into topomaps and then discriminative features are extracted from them and finally support vector machine (SVM) which is employed to predict brain states. For data collection, half of sixty-eight healthy individuals watched the learning material in 2D format whereas the rest watched the same material in 3D format. After learning task, memory recall tasks were performed after 30 minutes (STM) and two months (LTM), and EEG signals were recorded. In case of STM, 97.5% prediction accuracy was achieved for 3D and 96.6% for 2D and, in case of LTM, it was 100% for both 2D and 3D. The statistical analysis of the results suggested that for learning and memory recall both 2D and 3D materials do not have much difference in case of STM and LTM.
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF