1. Single-step versus two-step endo-ultrasonography-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocyst
- Author
-
Mangiavillano B, Arcidiacono PG, Masci E, mariani A, Petrone MC, Carrara S, Testoni S, TESTONI , PIER ALBERTO, Mangiavillano, B, Arcidiacono, Pg, Masci, E, Mariani, A, Petrone, Mc, Carrara, S, Testoni, S, and Testoni, PIER ALBERTO
- Subjects
Adult ,Gastrostomy ,Male ,Middle Aged ,Endosonography ,Treatment Outcome ,Pancreatitis, Chronic ,Acute Disease ,Pancreatic Pseudocyst ,Drainage ,Feasibility Studies ,Humans ,Female ,Stents ,Prospective Studies ,Aged ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the feasibility, technical success rate and complication between single-step endo-ultrasonography (EUS)-guided and two-step EUS-guided drainage technique for symptomatic pancreatic pseudocyst (PP). METHODS: Twenty-one PP patients with clear intra-cystic fluid that needed to be drained were divided into two groups, depending on the availability of the therapeutic echoendoscope at the time of the procedure: Group 1 (13 patients) underwent a single-step EUS-guided endoscopic drainage and Group 2 (8 patients) underwent a two-step EUS-guided drainage technique. RESULTS: In Group 1 immediate technical success was achieved in 92.3% (12/13); two patients had recurrent PP and both were successfully treated by a second EUS-guided drainage. Clinical success was achieved in all cases. In Group 2 technical success was achieved in 75.0% of the patients (6/8). One patient (12.5%) bled 36 h after the procedure. Five out of 6 patients had long-term success. Clinical success was significantly greater in Group 1 (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The technique of single-step EUS-guided drainage was superior to the technique of a two-step EUS-guided drainage technique for PP drainage.
- Published
- 2011