Search

Background Our previous work has identified factors relevant to general practitioner (GP)-led screening for atrial fibrillation (AF) in Australian general practices, with GPs indicating significant time constraints. AF SELF SMART (Atrial fibrillation self-screening, management and guideline recommended therapy) allows for opportunistic patient self-screening using purpose-built screening stations located in GP waiting rooms (figure 1). It utilises a single-lead ECG, with results automatically imported into the patient medical record for review during the GP consultation. AF SELF SMART may increase screening rates, but acceptability by practice staff is unknown. Purpose Determine staff perspectives on opportunistic self-screening in practice waiting rooms, utilising AF SELF SMART. Method 14 semi-structured interviews have been conducted with practice staff (GPs, receptionists and practice managers) across 3 practices participating in the AF SELF SMART pilot, with thematic analysis of results. Results Several themes were identified. All staff acknowledged the importance of increasing screening for AF in the practice. GPs in particular placed a high value on AF screening for stroke prevention. GPs valued the increased information and accuracy provided by AF SELF SMART, as previously they checked patients for AF using manual methods, either routinely or as clinically indicated. There were differential impacts on workflow. GPs reported some small increase in workload but these were seen as being acceptable given the benefits of the program. Receptionists and Practice Managers reported significant interruptions to normal workflow associated with assisting patients. Receptionists routinely offered patients help with screening instead of patients screening independently. Staff perceived that patients were either unable to negotiate the self-screening process by themselves, or did not want to try. Given the increase in workload associated with assisting patients, and as screening was not receptionists' main priority, not all patients were offered self-screening during busy periods. Patient refusal was also identified as a factor limiting uptake. Conclusion While AF self-screening may increase screening rates, further process improvements are required to reduce impact on reception staff, and enhance the usability of the self-screening station for patients. Such improvements may increase acceptability and ongoing sustainability at a practice level. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Investigator initiated research grant from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer Alliance Figure 1. Self-screening station

© 2018 The Authors. Background—This eHealth implementation study aimed to evaluate strategies to promote opportunistic atrial fibrillation (AF) screening using electronic screening prompts and improve treatment using electronic decision support (EDS) software. Methods and Results—An electronic screening prompt appeared whenever an eligible patient’s (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) medical record was opened in participating general practices. General practitioners and practice nurses offered screening using a smartphone ECG, with validated AF algorithm. Guideline-based EDS was provided to assist treatment decisions. Deidentified data were collected from practices using a data extraction tool. General practices (n=8) across Sydney, Australia, screened for a median of 6 months. A total of 1805 of 11 476 (16%) eligible patients who attended were screened (44% men, mean age 75.7 years). Screening identified 19 (1.1%) new cases of AF (mean age, 79 years; mean CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc, 3.7; 53% men). General practitioners (n=30) performed 70% of all screenings (range 1–448 patients per general practitioner). The proportion of patients with AF who had CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc ≥2 for men or ≥3 for women prescribed oral anticoagulants was higher for those diagnosed during the study: 15 of 18 (83%) for screen-detected and 39 of 46 (85%) for clinically detected, compared with 933 of 1306 (71%) patients diagnosed before the study (P

© 2018, Grupo de Investigacion en Atencion Farmaceutica. All rights reserved. The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer?.

The peer-review crisis is posing a risk to the scholarly peer-reviewed journal system. Journals have to ask many potential peer reviewers to obtain a minimum acceptable number of peers accepting reviewing a manuscript. Several solutions have been suggested to overcome this shortage. From reimbursing for the job, to eliminating pre-publication reviews, one cannot predict which is more dangerous for the future of scholarly publishing. And, why not acknowledging their contribution to the final version of the article published? PubMed created two categories of contributors: authors [AU] and collaborators [IR]. Why not a third category for the peer-reviewer? published

Background Opportunistic screening for silent atrial fibrillation (AF) is recommended to reduce stroke, but screening rates are sub-optimal in Australian general practice ( Purpose To increase the proportion of patients screened for AF in general practice by implementing AF self-screening stations in waiting rooms. Methods We developed and tested an AF self-screening station using a single-lead ECG and app with automated ECG analysis. We also developed customised software which fully integrates the self-screening station with GP medical software and the practice workflow (Figure 1). The system: 1) automatically identifies eligible patients (aged ≥65 years, no AF diagnosis) from the practice appointment diary, and sends an SMS regarding self-screening prior to their appointment; 2) automatically creates individualised patient QR codes, which provided to the patient by the receptionist; 3) the patient then scans QR code and self-screens at station in waiting room; 4) the ECG and result are automatically imported into patient record before the GP consultation. Results Three general practices in New South Wales, Australia, were recruited. Each practice participated for approximately 3-months (between August 2020 and March 2021). During this period 825 patients completed AF self-screening, mean age 74.2 years and 45% male. When expressed as a proportion of the actual eligible patients attending the practice during the study period, the mean proportion screened in practices was 52% (range 38–65%). The device algorithm indicated “Possible AF” in 37/825 patients (4.5%); mean age 77.2 years 43% male. Conclusion An AF self-screening station placed in GP waiting rooms that is integrated with the practice software and workflow may achieve higher screening rates for AF in general practice than standard practice, and therefore contribute to greater reductions in stroke. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Investigator-lead grant from Bristol Myers Squibb and Pfizer