1. Defining and identifying critical elements of, and lessons learned from addressing, ‘operational readiness’ for public health emergency events, including COVID-19: a rapid scoping review protocol
- Author
-
English, Rene, Geduld, Heike, Louw, Quinette, McCaul, Michael, Joseph, Conran, Pappin, Michele, Berner, Karina, Nyasulu, Juliet, and Charumbira, Maria
- Subjects
All hazards ,Disaster planning ,Pandemic ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Epidemic ,Infectious diseases ,Imminent threat ,Outbreak ,Public Health ,public health emergency ,readiness - Abstract
The proposed rapid scoping review has been commissioned by the World Health Organization (WHO) to inform an Operational Readiness Framework for the Country Readiness Strengthening Department in the World Health Emergencies Program in WHO (Reference #: 2021/1145765; Unit: MST; Cluster: QNF/SCI). Objective: The objective of the rapid scoping review is to define and identify the critical elements of ‘operational readiness’ for public health emergencies, including COVID-19, and identify lessons learnt from addressing it, to inform the World Health Organisation (WHO) Operational Readiness Framework. Introduction: ‘Readiness’ comprises the immediate actions needed to respond to a developing risk or hazard. Knowledge about critical readiness components and actions required by countries at all levels in response to health emergencies is critical to inform operational readiness actions for future events. Inclusion criteria: Evidence sources (peer reviewed and grey literature) referencing the concept of ‘operational readiness’ and/or preparedness for public health emergencies, considering an all-hazards health emergency management approach in community, health system and health service contexts and where the population includes groups/organisations who would respond and/or lead the response, will be eligible. Sources focusing only on longer-term preparedness or response actions, reporting on contexts beyond health emergencies or not focused on disease prevention and control will be excluded. Methods: Review methodology will follow Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Reporting will be done using relevant PRISMA Extensions. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases will be searched. Grey literature includes targeted repositories, websites, and databases of organisations involved in health emergencies and disaster risk management. Searches will be limited to 2010–2021 and English availability. Twenty percent of titles and abstracts will be screened by two reviewers. One reviewer will subsequently screen remaining titles and abstracts while the second will verify exclusions. Potentially eligible full texts will be screened by one reviewer, while a second will verify exclusions. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion. Depending on the yield of included sources, data extraction will be done using a dynamic approach involving one or more reviewers and an additional verifying reviewer. A pilot-tested custom extraction form will be used. Uncertainties will be discussed with team members. Included documents will be analysed by two reviewers using qualitative thematic analysis through a deductive synthesis approach. Dissemination: By defining evidence related to critical readiness components and actions, the review will reveal new insights, knowledge and lessons learnt that will translate into an operational framework for readiness actions. In consultation with WHO, findings will be disseminated as appropriate (e.g., through professional bodies, conferences, and research papers).
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF