1. Best Practices in Working with Immigrant Children and Families in the Child Welfare System: A Scoping Review Protocol
- Author
-
Lee, Barbara, Thieu, Vivian, and Zhao, Rose
- Subjects
Child welfare ,Child Protection ,Best Practices ,Scoping Review Protocol ,Social and Behavioral Sciences ,Immigrant - Abstract
The proposed scoping review follows the steps of Arksey and O’Malley’s (2005) scoping review framework and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines (Peters et al., 2020; Tricco et al., 2018). According to Arksey and O’Malley, a scoping review includes the following stages: 1) identify the research question, 2) identify the relevant studies, 3) study selection, 4) charting the data, and 5) collating, summarizing and reporting the results. This scoping review protocol will outline those stages to provide a comprehensive overview of the study. Stage 1: Identify the Research Question. The purpose of this scoping review is to examine the best practices in working with immigrant, newcomer, and migrant populations involved in the child welfare system. The research questions are: 1. What are the identified best practices in working with immigrant, newcomer, and migrant populations involved in the child welfare system? 2. What are the outcomes of the best practices in working with immigrant, newcomer, and migrant populations involved in the child welfare system? The scoping review will also examine the theory and methodology used to inform the development, as well as, the evaluation of the best practices. Stage 2: Identify Relevant Studies. The scoping review includes the following sources: 1) electronic databases, 2) hand-search of relevant journals, and 3) reference lists. The grey literature was not included because the purpose of the scoping review is to discover and document the available peer reviewed best practice literature for working with immigrant, newcomer, and migrant populations involved in the child welfare system. The findings obtained through a grey literature search may not meet eligibility and thus excepted. The concept block method was used to identify research studies in the following seven electronic databases: CINAHL, ERIC (via EBSCO), Medline (via EBSCO), PsycInfo, Social Service Abstract, and Social Work Abstracts. A standardized list of terms related to each concept (immigrant/newcomer/migrant, best practices, and child welfare/child protection) were used to search the titles, abstracts, and keywords for each database. The thesaurus or index terms was used to explore related terms pertaining to the key concepts and applied to the subject search field for each database. Relevant journals that are not included in electronic databases were hand-searched using the standardized list of concept terms. The reference list of the articles in the final stage of screening were manually reviewed, with the relevant articles identified and screened for inclusion. The scoping review span a 20-year period from January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2020 to focus on contemporary literature. Inclusion criteria included original peer-reviewed empirical research in English language with abstract and full-text available. Exclusion criteria included systematic reviews, literature reviews, conceptual articles, and book reviews. Stage 3: Study Selection. Covidence, an online software for conducting systematic review, was used to assist with the screening process. All research articles were uploaded into Covidence and duplications removed. The screening processed involves two steps: 1) title and abstract screening, and 2) full-text review. In the title and abstract screening step, two researchers will independently review the title and abstracts of each research article to determine its relevancy and inclusion for the next step. The lead author in consultation with another researcher will resolve any discrepancies. In the full-text review step, four researchers will independently review the full-text articles to determine eligibility. Stage 4: Charting the Data. The lead author developed a data extraction form to document the following information: year of publication, study location, type of study, research design, theory, study participants, sample size, ethno-racial group, best practice, measurement, and outcomes. The data extraction form was piloted and refined in consultation with the co-authors. The research team will independently review each of the eligible full-text articles and chart the data. Stage 5: Collating, Summarizing and Reporting the Results. Once the data is charted, the research team will meet to review the findings and conduct content analysis. The results will be presented in tables and in-text for publication. References. Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. Peters, M. D. J., Godfrey, C., McInerney, P., Munn, Z., Tricco, A. C., & Khalil, H. (2020). Chapter 11: Scoping reviews, In E. Aromataris, E. & Z. Munn (Eds.). JBI Reviewer’s Manual. Adelaide: JBI. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIRM-20-01 Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O’Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., et al. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and explanation. Annals of Internal Medicine, 169, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.7326/M18-0850.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF