Search

BACKGROUND AND AIMS SGLT2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are the first-line therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) and CKD, together with metformin according to most recent published guidelines. They are related to better renal and cardiovascular outcomes. SGLT2i could be potentially benefitial in terms of renal function preservation and cardiovascular outcomes in kidney transplantion (KT). Despite published data about SGLT2i in KT patients with DM2 or new-onset diabetes after transplantation are limited, their use seems to be common in everyday clinical practice. Our aim is to investigate if SGLT2i are safe and well tolerated in a cohort of KT recipients, as well as to analyze clinical and laboratory data at 6 months after SGLT2i initiation. METHOD Multicentre observational study in KT recipients with diabetes under SGLT2i treatment. RESULTS A total of 323 patients were included, and 284 completed a 6-month follow-up. Mean age was 61.2 ± 10.3 years old, 74.4% were men and 41% presented DM2. Previous antidiabetic therapies: insulin (48.1%), DPP4 inhibitors (36.1%) and metformin (33.1%). Empagliflozine was started in 55.8%, dapagliflozine in 23.2% and canagliflozin in 20.6%. After SGLT2i initiation, body weight reduction, an improvement in blood pressure and glycaemic control, higher haemoglobin levels and a decrease in cholesterol levels were observed. Also, a mild decrease in eGFR was detected while albuminuria was lower. These differences were statistically significant (Table 1). In 34 patients (10.5%), SGLT2i was stopped: 2.78% presented urinary tract infection (UTI), 1.5% balanitis and 1.2% important eGFR decreasing slope. During the study period, six patients presented a graft loss (one related to SLGT2) and six patients died (deaths not related to SGLT2i). CONCLUSION SGLT2i have a safe security profile in KT, and are related to a better glycaemic and blood pressure control, as well as to a decrease in albuminuria, and to an improvement in cardiovascular risk factors. Thus, SGLT2i should be prescribed in KT recipients with DM2 or NODAT with adequate eGFR. UTI surveillance is essential in these patients.

Background Sotrovimab is a neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb) that seems to remain active against recent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants. The evidence on its use in kidney transplant (KT) recipients, however, is limited. Methods We performed a multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 82 KT patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection {coronavirus disease 2019 [COVID-19]} treated with sotrovimab. Results Median age was 63 years. Diabetes was present in 43.9% of patients, and obesity in 32.9% of patients; 48.8% of patients had an estimated glomerular filtration rate under 30 mL/minute/1.73 m2. Additional anti–COVID-19 therapies were administered to 56 patients, especially intravenous steroids (65.9%). Sotrovimab was administered early ( Conclusions Sotrovimab had an excellent safety profile, even in high-comorbidity patients and advanced chronic kidney disease stages. Earlier administration could prevent progression to severe disease, while clinical outcomes were poor in patients treated later. Larger controlled studies enrolling KT recipients are warranted to elucidate the true efficacy of monoclonal antibody therapies.

Introduction Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) represents a histologic pattern of glomerular injury that may be due to several aetiologies. Few studies have comprehensively analysed the recurrence of MPGN according to the current classification system. Methods We collected a multicentre, retrospective cohort of 220 kidney graft recipients with biopsy-proven native kidney disease due to MPGN between 1981 and 2021 in 11 hospitals. Demographic, clinical and histologic parameters of prognostic interest were collected. The main outcomes were time to kidney failure, time to recurrence of MPGN and disease remission after recurrence. Results The study group included 34 complement-mediated and 186 immune complex–mediated MPGN. A total of 81 patients (37%) reached kidney failure in a median follow-up of 79 months. The main predictors of this event were the development of rejection episodes and disease recurrence. In all, 54 patients (25%) had a disease recurrence in a median of 16 months after kidney transplantation. The incidence of recurrence was higher in patients with dysproteinaemia (67%) and complement-mediated MPGN (62%). In the multivariable model, complement-mediated MPGN emerged as a predictor of recurrence. A total of 33 patients reached kidney failure after recurrence. The main determinants of no remission were early time to recurrence ( Conclusions One-fourth of the patients with native kidney disease due to MPGN developed clinical recurrence in the allograft, especially in cases with complement-mediated disease or in those associated with dysproteinaemia. The kidney outcomes of disease recurrence with currently available therapies are heterogeneous and thus more effective and individualized therapies are needed.

SARS CoV2 infection has had a major impact on renal transplant patients with a high mortality in the first months of the pandemic. Intentional reduction of immunosuppressive therapy has been postulated as one of the cornerstone in the management of the infection in the absence of targeted antiviral treatment. This has been modified according to the patient`s clinical situation and its effect on renal function or anti-HLA antibodies in the medium term has not been evaluated.Evaluate the management of immunosuppressive therapy made during SARS-CoV2 infection, as well as renal function and anti-HLA antibodies in kidney transplant patients 6 months after COVID19 diagnosis.Retrospective, national multicentre, retrospective study (30 centres) of kidney transplant recipients with COVID19 from 01/02/20 to 31/12/20. Clinical variables were collected from medical records and included in an anonymised database. SPSS statistical software was used for data analysis.615 renal transplant recipients with COVID19 were included (62.6% male), with a mean age of 57.5 years.The predominant immunosuppressive treatment prior to COVID19 was triple therapy with prednisone, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (54.6%) followed by m-TOR inhibitor regimens (18.6%). After diagnosis of infection, mycophenolic acid was discontinued in 73.8% of patients, m-TOR inhibitor in 41.4%, tacrolimus in 10.5% and cyclosporin A in 10%. In turn, 26.9% received dexamethasone and 50.9% were started on or had their baseline prednisone dose increased.Mean creatinine before diagnosis of COVID19, at diagnosis and at 6 months was: 1.7±0.8, 2.1±1.2 and 1.8±1 mg/dl respectively (p0.001).56.9% of the patients (N=350) were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies. 94% (N=329) had no anti-HLA changes, while 6% (N=21) had positive anti-HLA antibodies. Among the patients with donor-specific antibodies post-COVID19 (N=9), 7 patients (3.1%) had one immunosuppressant discontinued (5 patients had mycophenolic acid and 2 had tacrolimus), 1 patient had both immunosuppressants discontinued (3.4%) and 1 patient had no change in immunosuppression (1.1%), these differences were not significant.The management of immunosuppressive therapy after diagnosis of COVID19 was primarily based on discontinuation of mycophenolic acid with very discrete reductions or discontinuations of calcineurin inhibitors. This immunosuppression management did not influence renal function or changes in anti-HLA antibodies 6 months after diagnosis.

Background The use of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in women during pregnancy causes an increase in miscarriages and birth defects with a typical embryopathy profile. Although epidemiological data does not suggest a greater risk among the offspring of male kidney transplant recipients, the European Medicines Agency and The Spanish Agency of Medicines and Medical Devices introduced the recommendation of using contraceptive methods. Methods We conducted a national retrospective study in 15 Spanish Kidney Transplant Centers to evaluate the frequency of miscarriages and birth defects between the offspring from male kidney transplants recipients. We included 151 males who had fathered 239 offspring, 225 under MPA and 14 without MPA. Results The results of our study showed an incidence of miscarriages in the MPA group of 9.8%, and of birth defects of 4%. Conclusions We observed an incidence of miscarriages between the offspring fathered by kidney transplant males under MPA lower than the general population. The incidence of birth defects was similar to the incidence described in other studies and the fact that we did not find the typical embryopathy profile makes it difficult to associate them to the use of MPA. Because of that, we urge the European and Spanish Agencies to reconsider their recommendations for males.

Background and Aims Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is one of the most used immunosuppressive drugs. It is teratogenic in women with a typical embryopathy profile. Regarding its effect on the children of male kidney transplant recipients, although clinical evidence does not indicate a greater risk of malformations, the European Medicines Agency and the Spanish Agency for Medicines and Health Products introduced in 2015 the recommendation to use contraceptive methods because of their genotoxic potential. For this reason, we propose to study the results of the Spanish Kidney Transplant Centers. Method Multicenter retrospective observational study in which 15 Kidney Transplant Centers have participated. Of 3934 men ≤ 60 years old that received a kidney transplant between 2000 and 2015, 3023 were contacted, and 159 men who fathered at least one post-transplant pregnancy (total 252 fetuses) were included. We compared the incidence of abortions and live births with malformations among those who received MPA at the time of conception vs. those who did not. Results In the 252 fetuses (characteristics in table 1) there was an exitus and no differences were detected in the incidence of abortions between the group exposed to MPA (n = 230) and the unexposed group (n = 22), 11.3% vs 18.2%, p = 0.31. Among the 221 live-born fetuses, no differences were found in congenital malformations between the group exposed to MPA (n = 203) and the unexposed (n = 18) 4.9% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.07. Among the malformations described, the typical embryopathy profile of the MPA was not found. Conclusion According to the data of this retrospective national multicenter study, the use of MPA in male kidney transplant recipients does not cause a greater number of abortions or congenital malformations. For these reasons, and given the evidence also published by other groups, it seems necessary to reevaluate the recommendation given on contraception in men treated with MPA.