Search

In guilty plea hearings, judges must determine whether defendants' plea decisions were made knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily. Little is known, however, about how plea hearings unfold, especially in juvenile court, where hearings are generally closed to the public. In this study, we had the unique opportunity to systematically observe plea hearings in juvenile and criminal court.We predicted that plea hearings would be brief and that defendant participation, especially among juveniles, would be minimal. We also explored how often judges addressed the plea validity components of knowingness, intelligence, and voluntariness and whether addressing these components differed by the type of court (juvenile, criminal), pretrial custody status, and pled-to charge severity.Trained coders in California (n = 104, juvenile court) and Virginia (n = 140, juvenile court; n = 593, criminal court) systematically observed more than 800 guilty plea hearings. Coders reliably documented hearing length, whether the defendant was in pretrial custody, whether the evidence was reviewed, details on defendant participation, and judicial attention to plea validity.On average, juvenile plea hearings lasted about 7 min and criminal plea hearings lasted 13 min. Prosecutors rarely reviewed evidence against the defendants in the juvenile courts, and in one juvenile court, judges paid virtually no attention to plea validity. In the other two courts, certain waived rights (e.g., to trial, to silence) were reviewed consistently. Depending on the court, hearing length and plea validity elements addressed varied by defendants' prehearing custody status and the pled-to charge severity.These findings provide novel insight into how components necessary for plea admissibility-knowingness, voluntariness, and intelligence-are discussed with defendants and, in doing so, raise concerns about the degree to which plea validity is actively assessed in plea hearings. Plea hearings are formal, minutes-long events in which defendant engagement is low. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Emergency department (ED) high utilizers are a costly group of patients due to their higher utilzation of acute care costs. At a safety-net hospital, we enrolled patients in a program which partnered with lawyers and community health advocates (CHAs) to navigate patients' social, medical and legal needs. Our aim was to decrease costs and utilization and address the patient's social determinants of heath (SDOH).We enrolled patients with 4 or more ED visits in the prior 6 months and gave them SDOH and medical questionnaires. Patients were followed for 6 months on a weekly, then bi-monthly basis. All utilization and cost data were obtained through an internal data warehouse and evaluated using a pre-post analysis and broken down into quartiles.ED, admission, and total costs did not differ significantly between the 12 months pre-enrollment and the 12 months post-enrollment. Outpatient costs did increase ($2182 increase, p0.005). ED visits declined significantly in the post-enrollment period (IRR = 0.84, p = 0.048), with the highest impact on those with7 ED visits. Total admissions did not decline (IRR 0.84, p = 0.059). But, among those with 4 or 5 ED visits, admission costs and visits decreased. On average, six SDOH issues were identified. Of these, approximately 30.3% were mitigated with up to 17% requiring legal help.While outpatient costs did increase, total costs did not decrease in this program. This type of non-clinical intervention may be best served for patients who are less clinically complex but significant social needs.

In the world of health care litigation it has become clear that medical malpractice cases now contain two claims-one on the medicine and one on the electronic health record (EHR). Two years of contentious discovery motions over the production of a complete copy of the EHR and audit trail in a case involving the delivery of a baby recently resulted in a nightmare scenario for a large health care system: sanctions in the form of an order entering judgment of liability in favor of the patient. The order was entered before depositions on the medicine were ever held. The decision in Prieto v. Rush University Medical Center (RUMC), et al. is the premiere example why patients' lawyers are focused on the audit trail. In this case, they were able to secure a legal victory without even litigating the underlying facts of the case.

The academic response to Bourdieu's sociology of law has mainly followed his Weberian focus on the role of legal professionals in state transformations. However, rereading Bourdieu's “The Force of Law” through the lens of its references and relating it to the sociology of law “of the moment” (i.e. that of the 1980s), it becomes clear that Bourdieu's sociology of law is more sophisticated than has generally been acknowledged. In this article, we reread Bourdieu's article with a specific focus on the hitherto overlooked parts that elucidate dispute transformation. We unpack one of Bourdieu's most central sources, Felstiner et al. (1981), by rereading it in the light of Bourdieu's sociological tools. Emphasizing Bourdieu's implicit points about the pre-dispute phase accentuates how habitual dispositions and forms of capital have an impact on the possibilities available to citizens to transform a justiciable problem into a legal dispute. The academic response to Bourdieu's sociology of law has mainly followed his Weberian focus on the role of legal professionals in state transformations. However, rereading Bourdieu's “The Force of Law” through the lens of its references and relating it to the sociology of law “of the moment” (i.e. that of the 1980s), it becomes clear that Bourdieu's sociology of law is more sophisticated than has generally been acknowledged. In this article, we reread Bourdieu's article with a specific focus on the hitherto overlooked parts that elucidate dispute transformation. We unpack one of Bourdieu's most central sources, Felstiner et al. (1981), by rereading it in the light of Bourdieu's sociological tools. Emphasizing Bourdieu's implicit points about the pre-dispute phase accentuates how habitual dispositions and forms of capital have an impact on the possibilities available to citizens to transform a justiciable problem into a legal dispute.

Researchers have established that rape myths shape perceptions of victims and perpetrators in criminal cases. Researchers have devoted less attention to exploring the impact of child sexual abuse (CSA) myths in court. While we know that jurors believe myths and misconceptions about the nature of CSA, no work has explored how these myths appear during the prosecution of CSA cases. The purpose of the present investigation was to assess how defense attorneys apply myths more specific to CSA in the questioning of children testifying about alleged CSA. The present study compliments and expands upon a previous study by St. George and colleagues (2021a), where authors examined the use of rape myths in the questioning of children making allegations of CSA. In the current study, we examined testimonies of 122 children testifying in criminal cases of alleged CSA in the United States. We qualitatively coded 6,384 lines of questioning for references to CSA-focused myths related to the disclosure process, witnesses and privacy issues, assumptions of harm, and the child’s positive relationship with the perpetrator. These myths were common, occurring in over 10% of defense attorneys’ lines of questioning. Disclosure issues were the most frequent, followed by witness and privacy issues, assumptions of harm, and the child’s positive relationship with their perpetrator. In many cases, attorneys employed different strategies across child’s age to highlight these myths. These findings compliment those of prior work suggesting that CSA myths, much like rape myths, are appearing with regularity. Defense attorneys are likely capitalizing on jurors’ misconceptions to undermine children’s believability.

Purpose Given the training and experience of lawyers, we assumed that a study of lawyers’ willingness to disclose disability in the workplace would provide an example of the actions of a group knowledgeable about disability law. The current study accounts for the effect of visibility of disability, onset and type of disability, and whether the lawyer has made an accommodation request. We also investigate the role of other individual characteristics, such as sexual orientation, gender identity, race/ethnicity, age, and job-related characteristics, in willingness to disclose. Methods We use data from the first phase of a longitudinal national survey of lawyers in the USA to estimate the odds of disclosing disability to co-workers, management, and clients using proportional odds models. Results Lawyers with less visible disabilities, those with mental health disabilities, and those who work for smaller organizations have lower odds of disclosing to co-workers, management, and clients as compared to their counterparts. Attorneys who have requested accommodations are more willing to disclose as compared to those who have not, but only to co-workers and management. Women are less likely than men to disclose to management and clients. However, gender is not a significant determinant of disclosure to co-workers. Older attorneys are more likely to disclose to clients, whereas attorneys with children are less likely to disclose to co-workers. Lastly, lower perceived prejudice and the presence of co-workers with disabilities are associated with higher disclosure scores, but not for all groups. Conclusions Individuals who acquired a disability at a relatively early point in life and those with more visible disabilities are more likely to disclose. However, such willingness is affected by the intersection of disability with other individual and firm-level characteristics. Implications for Cancer Survivors. The findings imply that those with less visible disabilities and with health conditions acquired later in life are less likely to disclose. The relevance of the findings is heightened by the altered work conditions and demands imposed by the COVID-19 pandemic for cancer survivors.

a.Objectives: Two studies were conducted to determine whether mindfulness meditation could be an effective tool for improving the well-being of lawyers—a population plagued by high rates of depression, anxiety, and stress.b.Methods: Study 1. Participants recruited from the National Association of Women Lawyers completed questionnaires before and after engaging in an 8-week mindfulness program. Study 2. Lawyers from an American law firm were randomly assigned to either an experimental or waitlist control condition. Well-being was measured at the beginning of the study and after experimental participants had completed a 30-day intervention. c.Results: Study 1. Participants reported significant improvements in mood, resilience, trait mindfulness, stress, anxiety, and depression over time. Study 2. Post-intervention, experimental participants reported better mood, lower levels of stress, and higher levels of non-reactivity and observing than waitlist control participants.d.Conclusions: Legal professionals may benefit from the practices of mindfulness and meditation.

According to a landmark decision by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court, people with a substance use disorder (SUD) are now eligible for disability benefits if their disorder impairs their ability to work. Alcohol use disorder (AUD) is one of the most common SUDs in Switzerland and is associated with high societal and economic costs. This study aimed to gain an in-depth understanding of the views of professional stakeholder groups regarding AUD and their opinions on the new legal precedent.Swiss social insurance lawyers, insurance medical experts, and addiction-specialist therapists (N = 79) answered an online questionnaire. Due to violations of the assumption of normality, non-parametric tests are reported in most cases.Therapists held significantly higher regard for patients with AUD than both lawyers and insurance medical experts. All three groups strongly supported a disease view of AUD but agreed significantly less that it was a disease like cancer, suggesting that AUDs might be seen as at least partially self-inflicted. Overall, moralist views of AUD received considerably less support than the disease view, with lawyers agreeing with moralist views more than therapists. All groups were well-informed and largely supportive about the new legal precedent. When asked about stipulating participation in medical treatment to mitigate damages associated with a claim, attending therapy was supported the most amongst the groups (80% of participants felt this was somewhat or fully appropriate), followed by a reduction in drinking quantity (58%), and abstinence (18%). In all three groups, we identified associations between certain views and opinions on AUD and support for the new legal precedent.Whilst there were differences between the stakeholder groups in their regard for and views of AUD, all three adopted a clear harm-reduction approach with respect to measures to mitigate damages associated with the insurance disability claim. A possible connection of this stance with the Swiss national drug policy in recent years is discussed together with limitations of the study and practical implications of the findings.

Purpose This descriptive study determined lawyers' beliefs about mental illnesses and their tendency to stigmatize people with mental illnesses. Design and methods The sample consisted of 181 lawyers. Data were collected using a demographic characteristics form, the Beliefs toward Mental Illness Scale (BMI), and the Stigma Scale (SS). Findings Participants felt compassion, uneasiness, curiosity, and pity for people with mental illnesses. Participants had a mean BMI and SS score of 1.99 ± 0.70 and 2.19 ± 0.61, respectively. Their BMI and SS scores were moderately and positively correlated (r = 0.554) PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Lawyers should be informed about mental illness by courses within the context of health education in law schools' curricula. Future studies should focus on other community leaders' beliefs about mental illness and their tendency to stigmatize people with mental illnesses.

Mediation is intended to provide a less formal and more collaborative forum for dispute resolution than a court or tribunal and one in which the parties themselves can actively participate in reaching a settlement. There is an assumption that, guided by a skilled mediator, they can do so without lawyer assistance. Indeed, the presence of lawyers tends to be discouraged, deemed not conducive to the informality and the non-adversarial character of mediation. Yet in a mediation there is often an imbalance of power and inequality of arms and fundamental rights can be at issue. One such area is special educational needs (SEN), applicable to nearly 1.5 million children in England, a field where disputes between families and local authorities are common. This article examines the case for and against lawyer involvement in mediations of this kind and considers what might be the most appropriate model of such involvement.

Past investigations have consistently demonstrated the robust stereotype-consistent effect in the circumstance of source memory but not always in item memory, including the case of professional stereotype. However, it remains unclear whether the effect still occurs in professional stereotype when considering the attributes of negative (or bad) or positive (or good); besides, it has not been concerned about how does warning work in remembering the professional stereotypical stimuli. The current experiments aimed to address these issues by adopting descriptive sentences as stimuli, which were related or unrelated to doctors and lawyers, and with different professional moral valences (negative, neutral, or positive). Item memory and source memory were tested successively. Experiment 1 without the explicit warning confirmed the reliable stereotype-consistent effect solely in source memory; the modulation of professional morality on memory behaved differently between doctor and lawyer, that is, negativity bias versus positivity bias. When giving an explicit warning (Experiment 2), the stereotype-consistent effect attenuated in the lawyer case, and the occurrence of negativity bias was sensitive to the memory task. Thus, our findings further reinforce the dual-process model; both professional morality and warning work in memory of professional stereotype, depending upon the nature of the profession, the concerned memory task, and also the presence of warning. Implications are made for future research to consider more perspectives.

Researchers studying children’s reports of sexual abuse have focused on how questioners overtly assess coaching and truthfulness (e.g., “Did someone tell you what to say?”). Yet attorneys, and defense attorneys, in particular, may be motivated to ask about suggestive influence and truthfulness in subtle ways, such as with implied meaning (e.g., “Did your mom help you remember?”). Such questions may be particularly challenging for children, who may interpret statements literally, misunderstanding the suggested meaning. The purpose of this study was to examine and categorize how attorneys’ ask about suggestive influence and truthfulness. We wanted to learn how attorneys subtly accuse suggestive influence, and how frequently this occurred. We hypothesized that questions indirectly accusing suggestive influence would be common, and that defense attorneys would ask more subtle questions, and fewer overt questions, than prosecutors. We examined 7,103 lines of questioning asked by prosecutors and defense attorneys to 64 children testifying about alleged child sexual abuse. We found that 9% of all attorneys’ lines of questioning asked about suggestive influence or truthfulness. The majority (66%) of these were indirect accusations. Indirect accusations of suggestive influence spanned a range of subtleties and topics, including addressing conversational influences (e.g., coaching), incidental influences (e.g., witnessing abuse), and others. We also found defense attorneys were less likely than prosecutors to ask about suggestive influence and truthfulness overtly. We conclude that attorneys commonly ask about suggestive influence and truthfulness in subtle ways that developing children may struggle to understand, and which may result in affirmations of influence, even when allegations are true.

This revised Protocol updates and replaces the Review Protocol registered on the Open Science Framework website on 13 February 2020, entitled “Review Protocol for the Systematic Mapping of Well-Being in Lawyers, Accountants, Investment Bankers, and Management Consultants, and an In-Depth Synthesis Review of Lawyers’ Well-Being”. Amendments have been made to the originally registered version following the completion of the pre-review stakeholder engagement process, as described in Section 7 of the Protocol as previously registered. The purpose of this revised Protocol is to set out the final plan for review. The review authors express their gratitude to all members of the Stakeholder Advisory Panel for their helpful contributions, and diligent and enthusiastic engagement in this process.

Rising reports of poor well-being in the legal profession have been noted in multiple countries and jurisdictions. With increased global concerns about lawyer well-being, the amount of practitioner and academic literature has also increased. However, the literature remains fragmented and disparate, with a lack of comprehensive review in this area. A systematic scoping (mapping) of the literature is therefore needed to characterise the current body of knowledge, identify key concepts and contexts thought to influence lawyer well-being, and collate this knowledge in the form of a searchable database. The creation of this new knowledge will enable a synthesis review to be performed to integrate and analyse the available evidence and perspectives published globally within this emerging field. The revised Protocol (v.2.0) updates and replaces the Review Protocol registered on the Open Science Framework website on 13 February 2020, entitled “Review Protocol for the Systematic Mapping of Well-Being in Lawyers, Accountants, Investment Bankers, and Management Consultants, and an In-Depth Synthesis Review of Lawyers’ Well-Being”. Amendments have been made to the originally registered version following the completion of the pre-review stakeholder engagement process, as described in Section 7 of the Protocol as previously registered. The purpose of the revised Protocol is to set out the final plan for review. The review authors express their gratitude to all members of the Stakeholder Advisory Panel for their helpful contributions, and diligent and enthusiastic engagement in this process.

Rising reports of poor well-being in the legal profession have been noted in multiple countries and jurisdictions. With increased global concerns about lawyer well-being, the amount of practitioner and academic literature has also increased. However, the literature remains fragmented and disparate, with a lack of comprehensive review in this area. A systematic scoping (mapping) of the literature is therefore needed to characterise the current body of knowledge, identify key concepts and contexts thought to influence lawyer well-being, and collate this knowledge in the form of a searchable database. The creation of this new knowledge will enable a synthesis review to be performed to integrate and analyse the available evidence and perspectives published globally within this emerging field. The review will also systematically scope the literature concerning well-being in three other professional groups which operate within similar work environments to lawyers, namely accounting, investment banking, and management consulting. By including these professional groups in the review, an important source of knowledge will be created, against which the well-being of lawyers can be compared and synthesised. This review will adopt a two-staged approach. The first stage will scope and map the current literature using systematic mapping methodology and stakeholder involvement. Using outputs from the systematic mapping stage, an in-depth thematic synthesis review of lawyers’ well-being will then be conducted.

Before the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, North Carolina had seen encouraging reductions in opioid overdose deaths. In the years since, this trend has unfortunately reversed. In this interview, Guest Editor Carrie Rosario talks with North Carolina Attorney General Josh Stein about how the state will use settlement funds to prevent future overdose deaths.

International research has explored lawyer-child interactions in court; however, little focus has been spent examining other aspects of lawyers' interactions with children (e.g., interview preparation; building rapport).The present study investigated lawyer's self-reported interactions with child witnesses.Participants included 96 lawyers (MA survey was used to gather self-reported data on how lawyers prepare for, question, and respond to children as witnesses in court. We then explored whether these strategies differed depending on the role of the Canadian lawyer (i.e., prosecution or defence), experience, or gender.Results indicate that lawyers report and demonstrate knowledge consistent with current best practices in questioning children. While gender and experience did not appear to play a strong role in lawyer-child interactions, prosecutors reported behavior more consistent with best practices compared to defence lawyers.These findings provide important insight into strengths and weaknesses of lawyer-child interactions in court as well as highlight a strong need for future research to examine the link between self-reported behavior (i.e., perceived behavior) with observable behavior (i.e., actual behavior) in lawyer-child interactions.

Athough, first forms of legal provisions concerning medical research in Croatia (ex Yugoslavia) came into force during 1970s (regulating work of "commissions for drugs"), more vivid presence and impact of law within bioethics can be traced in the 1990s. Beside the new Law on Health Protection (1997) - articles 51 and 52 requiring the establishment of ethics committees and regulating the framework of their duties, the introduction and the success of the law occured as a consequence of political changes and international opening, influencing education, research, health and social policies. Later progression of the legal discipline within bioethics can be noticed not only with respect to the work of prominent legal experts, but also the main tide of Croatian bioethics, particularly the Integrative Bioethics of Ante Čović.The aim of this paper is to detect the main representatives of legal perspective and discipline within modern bioethical trends in Croatia, as well as to clarify some of the many intriguing mutal influences.

Over the last 15 years, the working context of lawyers has undergone many changes. Evolving in an increasingly competitive, deregulated, and globalized market, they are subject to higher tax pressure while being exposed to unbridled technological innovation. Indeed, a growing number of entrepreneurs are using digital solutions to provide online legal services that are supposed to be faster and cheaper. If many of them are nonlawyer legal entrepreneurs, many lawyers are also engineering innovative projects and launching their own start-up companies, known as “LegalTech” or “LawTech.” However, few studies—or none to our limited knowledge—provide an empirically grounded analysis of such projects, leaving some questions unanswered. Who are these entrepreneurial lawyers? How and why do they engineer and develop LegalTech projects? How do they challenge the legal profession? To answer these questions, this article draws on a qualitative study of three contrasted start-ups Belgian lawyers have recently developed. The research methodology combines gray and scientific literature reviews, web-document (hereafter “manifestos”) analysis, and semi-directive interviews led with the start-up’s founders (n = 5), the Bar Association’s representatives (n = 3), and some members of the main Belgian LegalTech network (n = 4).

OBJECTIVES Research on plea bargaining is increasing, yet much of this work examines how the process unfolds in adult court. Plea bargaining in juvenile court has several notable differences such as parental involvement. Including parents throughout the adjudicatory process is encouraged but ultimately left up to the attorney. Research has not explored whether attorneys include parents in plea bargain discussions with their clients. The present study examined parental involvement in the juvenile plea bargain process. HYPOTHESES We did not have any formal a priori hypotheses for this exploratory study. METHOD The first author conducted qualitative interviews with eighteen defense attorneys from the juvenile division of a public defender's office on the East Coast where we discussed their most recent case that resulted in a plea bargain. RESULTS Parents were included in plea negotiations and hearings. Attorneys described seeking parental input because parents may be impacted by the terms of the plea and because the court often seeks parental approval. During hearings, parents offered input regarding their child's ability to plea, the disposition plan, and whether they support their child's decision to plead guilty. CONCLUSIONS Pleas might impact parents, so it may be impractical to overlook their interests. However, parent and child interests may conflict, and parents often lack understanding of their children's rights and pleading generally. Therefore, attorneys must not only advocate for their clients, but also educate and manage parents' interests both inside and outside the courtroom. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

OBJECTIVE: COVID-19 has impacted many facets of daily life and the legal system is no exception. Legal scholars have hypothesized that the effects of the pandemic may contribute to more coercive plea bargains (Cannon, 2020; Johnson, 2020). In this study, we explored defense attorneys' perceptions of whether and how the plea process has changed during the COVID-19 pandemic. HYPOTHESES: This study was exploratory, and we made no a priori hypotheses. METHOD: We surveyed 93 practicing United States defense attorneys about their perceptions of whether and how the pandemic has affected court procedures, plea-bargaining and prosecutorial behavior, and defendant decision-making. We conducted semistructured follow-up interviews with 13 defense attorneys to help contextualize the survey responses. RESULTS: The majority of defense attorneys (81%, n = 76) reported that the plea process had changed during the COVID-19 pandemic, and that they experienced difficulty contacting and communicating with their clients, especially those who were detained. Two thirds of defense attorneys (n = 42) who said the plea process had changed thought that prosecutors were offering more lenient deals. One third of defense attorneys with detained clients (n = 23) reported having had clients plead guilty due to COVID-19 related conditions who might not have under normal circumstances. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of defense attorneys reported that the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted their ability to access and advise clients, and they believed that leverage in plea negotiations had shifted further to individual prosecutors. At the same time, the attorneys reported that prosecutors were offering more lenient deals, painting a complex picture of the plea negotiation process during the pandemic. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

In child sexual abuse cases, a central part of the child’s testimony is their description of the abuse episode. However, it is often difficult for children to describe the body mechanics of abuse, and miscommunications are likely to occur. In the present study, we examined questions about the mechanics of abuse in trial transcripts ( N = 63) to identify sources of miscommunication ( N = 130) between attorneys and children (5–12 years old, M age at trial = 9.44, SD = 1.97). We found that both attorneys and children used imprecise language, which led to miscommunication. Specifically, the imprecise use of sexual terminology and the word “touch,” polarity items, broad open-ended questions, anaphora and elliptical questions, and “how” questions led to imprecision in attorneys’ questions. Imprecise attorney questions often elicited underinformative answers from children, including misinterpretations of the grain size (i.e., level of detail) requested. In response to these underinformative answers, attorneys at times asked highly focused and leading questions, which led to further miscommunications. Implications and recommendations for future research on how best to elicit details about the mechanics of abuse from children are discussed.

The unique Scottish legal system stands apart from the better-known Anglo-American legal system, with variations relating to jury size (15 vs. 12), the number of verdicts available (3 vs. 2) and majority size (simple majority vs. unanimous). At present, only a handful of investigations have explored the effects of the Scottish ‘not proven’ verdict on jurors, and only a single study has explored the combined impact of the unique elements of the Scottish legal system on juror and jury decision making. The current study is the first to investigate the views of Scottish legal professionals on the three-verdict system, 15-person jury and simple majority verdict system. The aim of the study is to inform public and political debate, involve legal stakeholders in policy changes and decision making and compare legal professionals’ views with findings from previously conducted juror studies. Seventy-eight legal professionals took part in an online survey which asked for ratings and open responses on their attitudes to the Scottish (a) three-verdict system, (b) 15-person jury and (c) simple majority system. The results highlighted strong positive attitudes towards the ‘not proven’ verdict (particularly in a binary-verdict system of proven and not proven), 15-person juries and both the simple and qualified majority verdict systems. There was minimal support for reform towards an Anglo-American system. Instead, the reforms preferred by the legal professionals would be to require a qualified majority of 12/15 jurors, and to use a binary-verdict system of proven and not proven.

The Queensland Mental Health Review Tribunal makes difficult decisions regarding involuntary treatment of people with mental illness, applying strict legislative criteria against a backdrop of fundamental human rights considerations. This article reports on focus group research with lawyers and advocates for people with mental illness who appear before the Queensland Mental Health Review Tribunal. Participants expressed concerns regarding the manner in which decisions are made. For example, participants said that their clients’ views on the side effects of treatment do not receive adequate consideration when involuntary treatment is authorised. We review these concerns in the light of applicable legal obligations, including those arising from human rights law. We conclude that if these concerns are accurate, some adjustments to the Queensland Mental Health Review Tribunal’s decision-making processes are required.

Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) has become an inescapable reality in Canada since the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) declared in Carter v Canada (Attorney General) ([2015] 1 S.C.R. 331) (Carter) that the blanket prohibition on physician assisted dying was unconstitutional. Instead of prescribing the regulatory criteria to control the provision of MAID, the SCC invited the respective federal and provincial governments to establish the legislative framework (Carter, [127]).

Research, policy and practice in the field of interprofessional collaboration have focused on how medical, nursing, allied health and social care practitioners work together to positively impact patient care. This paper extends conceptual thinking about interprofessional practice by focusing on lawyers as part of the interprofessional mix. This attention is prompted by medical���legal partnerships (MLPs), a service model by which lawyers join health care settings to assist patients with unmet, and often health-harming, legal needs. MLPs are present in around 450 hospitals and other health care sites across the United States and the model has spread to other countries, including Australia, the United Kingdom and Canada. However, enthusiasm for the MLP model is not yet matched by good evidence on how, when and for whom the model works. Interprofessional scholars contend that imprecise terminology and poor conceptualization of interprofessional arrangements hinder high-quality research and evaluation. In response to their critiques, this paper formulates a stepwise conceptual framework to guide the design, implementation and study of interprofessional arrangements that connect health, social care and legal practitioners. This framework draws on findings from national surveys of MLP initiatives in several countries and adapts several key conceptual frameworks that have been developed from systematic reviews of interprofessional working in primary health care. These conceptual frameworks are valuable because they promote clarity about different modes of interprofessional working and characterize the factors at macro (policy, funding), meso (organizational) and micro (practitioner, patient) levels that help or hinder professionals from different disciplines in working together. The paper considers factors at these three levels that require particular attention when lawyers join health care settings and proposes questions for future research in this emerging area.

THE PROBLEM Marginalized populations experience health-harming legal needs-barriers to good health that require legal advocacy to overcome. Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) embed lawyers into the healthcare team to resolve these issues, but identifying patients with health-harming legal needs is complex, and screening practices vary across MLPs.Purpose of Article: Academic and community partners who collaborate in an MLP at a school-based health center (SBHC) share their process of co-creating a two-stage legal check-up for adolescents. KEY POINTS Screening adolescents for health-harming legal needs is challenging. It took ongoing collaboration to refine the process to fit the needs of adolescents and meet the partners' goals. CONCLUSION Social determinants of health play a significant role in health disparities, and there is a need for innovative solutions to screen and address these in vulnerable populations. Other partners can learn from our experiences to co-create their own approach to addressing health-harming legal needs.

Law professionals are an understudied population that is integral to society. Limited research indicates lawyers experience poor mental health, decreased wellbeing, and suicidality. This cross-sectional study recruited 654 law professionals and responses to a depression scale, the patient health questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) were compared with the general working population. Lawyers were significantly more likely to report suicidal ideation "several days" and "more than half the days" as compared with the general working population, with odds ratios (OR) of 6.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.16 to 10.29) and 5.50 (95% CI 2.23 to 13.53) respectively. Lawyers were more likely reported mild (OR = 3.89, 95% CI 3.04 to 4.96), moderate (OR = 5.29, 95% CI 3.61 to 7.76), moderately severe (OR = 9.71, 95% CI 5.50 to 17.14), and severe (OR = 18.34, 95% CI 6.00 to 56.11) depressive symptoms. 17.5% of lawyers in this study were experiencing symptoms equivalent to a diagnosis of a major depressive disorder.

Legal services can play a critical role in facilitating claimant access to entitlements and shaping claimant experiences and outcomes in compensation settings. However, much remains unknown about claimants' goals in engaging legal services, experiences of using legal services, and satisfaction with legal advisers. Drawing on semi-structured interviews with claimants in the road traffic injury compensation scheme in the State of Victoria, Australia, this article identified that most claimants engaged legal services to access entitlements when they struggled to do so alone. Claimants often had little understanding of the activities performed by their lawyers: despite this, most viewed legal service use as valuable or worthwhile in terms of outcomes achieved. Claimants' experiences and levels of satisfaction were coloured by the quantity and quality of communication between themselves and their legal representatives. The findings highlight opportunities for schemes, lawyers, and legal profession regulators to increase the responsiveness of services to claimants' needs.

La profession d’avocat se structure autour d’une identité collective spécifique. Cette identité est défendue, au cours de la seconde moitié du XIXe siècle, par un groupe d’avocats particulièrement dynamique, porteur de valeurs dites « traditionnelles ». Elle s’appuie essentiellement sur le corpus déontologique hérité de l’époque napoléonienne. Le développement économique et industriel entraîne une croissance très importante des sociétés commerciales. Forts de leur compétence juridique, les avocats intègrent les conseils d’administrations des sociétés anonymes. Cette extension du champ d’activités de l’avocat vers la sphère économique est considérée par le barreau traditionnaliste comme une atteinte aux principes déontologiques, en particulier le principe d’indépendance de l’avocat et la prohibition des actes de commerce. La question des avocats-administrateurs de sociétés devient, entre 1880 et 1925, un objet de tensions très vives au sein du barreau de Bruxelles. Le barreau traditionnaliste y voit une fragilisation des valeurs qui structurent l’identité professionnelle de l’avocat et par là, un risque pour la survie même de la profession d’avocat. The legal profession is structured around a specific collective identity. During the second half of the 19th century, this identity is defended by a particularly dynamic group of lawyers, who defend a "traditional" perspective of the legal profession. It is based on the ethical corpus inherited from the Napoleonic era. Economic and industrial development lead to the increase of commercial companies. As experts in law, the lawyers are called to advice and integrate the directorial boards. This extension of the lawyer's field activities to the economic sphere is considered by the traditionalist bar as a violation of ethical principles, especially the principle of lawyer independence and the prohibition of commercial activities. This issue becomes between 1880 and 1925 an object of very sharp tensions in the Brussels Bar. The traditionalist bar considers this extension of activities as a weakening of the values ​​that shape the professional identity of the lawyer and hence a risk to the survival itself of the profession of lawyer.

Attorneys regularly prepare advance healthcare directives for their clients. However, attorneys, lacking medical knowledge, are often considered ill-equipped to prepare such documents. While recognizing and respecting the fact that advance healthcare directives pertain to decisions about medical care, this article proposes that attorneys who prepare advance healthcare directives nevertheless provide a valuable service.

Racial disparities in conviction and incarceration have been lamentable features of legal systems for a long time. Research has addressed the attitudes and decisions of police, prosecutors, jurors, and judges in contributing to these disparities, but very little attention has been paid to defendants' own team members-i.e., criminal defense attorneys. Researchers have specifically identified this as a "scholarly gap". To address this, we conducted an empirical study of criminal defense attorneys practicing in forty-three U.S. states (N = 327). The attorneys completed both an implicit measure designed to capture racial bias (a race Implicit Association Test) and an explicit measure designed to capture interpersonal regard for clients. The results provided support for longstanding, but previously speculative, assertions of bias in criminal defense.

Money laundering has ascended the enforcement and criminological agenda in the course of this century, and has been accompanied by an increased focus on legal professionals as ‘enablers’ of crime. This article explores the dynamics of this enforcement, media and political agenda, and how the legal profession has responded in the UK and elsewhere, within the context of ignoring the difficulties of judging the effectiveness of anti money laundering. It concludes that legal responses are a function of their lobbying power, the determination of governments to clamp down on the toxic impacts of legal structures, and different legal cultures. However, it remains unclear what the effects on the levels and organization of serious crimes for gain are of controls on the professions.

Purpose: Workplace accommodations, vital for employees with disabilities, promote diversity and inclusion efforts in organizations. This article examines who requests accommodations and who is more likely to have requests granted. We investigate the roles of individual characteristics and their intersection, including disability, sexual orientation, gender, race/ethnicity, and age. Methods: Using data from a national survey of U.S. lawyers, we estimate the odds of requesting accommodations and having the requests approved. We also estimate differences in odds according to individual characteristics, adjusting for control variables. Results: Personal identity factors, such as disability status, gender, and age, predict requests for accommodations. Odds of requesting accommodations were higher for women and people with disabilities as compared to men and those without disabilities, but lower for older individuals. Odds of requesting accommodations were higher for an older population segment—older lesbian, gay, bisexual, and queer (LGBQ) lawyers—than for younger lawyers. Accommodations were granted differentially to individuals with multiple marginalized identities. Counter to predictions, being a person with a disability is negatively associated with having an accommodation granted. Older lawyers generally have higher odds of having accommodations granted, but odds for groups such as women and racial/ethnic minorities decline with age. LGBQ lawyers who are racial minorities have lower odds than White LGBQ lawyers of having their accommodations granted. Longer tenure increases the odds of requesting accommodations. Working for a private organization decreases the odds; working for a large organization generally increases the odds. Conclusions: Those most needing accommodations, such as lawyers with disabilities and women, are more likely to request accommodations. Disabled lawyers, older women lawyers, older racial/ethnic minority lawyers, and LGBQ minority lawyers have relatively low odds of having requests granted. The results highlight the need to consider intersectional identities in the accommodation process.

Background Locked-in syndrome (LIS) characterizes individuals who have experienced pontine lesions, who have limited motor output but with preserved cognitive abilities. Despite their severe physical impairment, individuals with LIS self-profess a higher quality of life than generally expected. Such third-person expectations about LIS are shaped by personal and cultural factors in western countries. Objective We sought to investigate whether such opinions are further influenced by the cultural background in East Asia. We surveyed attitudes about the ethics of life-sustaining treatment in LIS in a cohort of medical and non-medical Chinese participants. Results The final study sample included 1545 respondents: medical professionals (n = 597, 39%), neurologists (n = 303, 20%), legal professionals (n = 276, 18%) and other professionals (n = 369, 24%), including 180 family members of individuals with LIS. Most of the participants (70%), especially neurologists, thought that life-sustaining treatment could not be stopped in individuals with LIS. It might be unnecessary to withdraw life-sustaining treatment, because the condition involved is not terminal and irreversible, and physical treatment can be beneficial for the patient. A significant proportion (59%) of respondents would like to be kept alive if they were in that condition; however, older people thought the opposite. Families experience the stress of caring for individuals with LIS. The mean (SD) quality of life score for relatives was 0.73 (2.889) (on a −5, +5 scale), which was significantly lower than that of non-relatives, 1.75 (1.969) (P Conclusions Differences in opinions about end of life in LIS are affected by personal characteristics. The current survey did not identify a dissociation between personal preferences and general opinions, potentially because of a social uniformity in China where individualism is less pronounced. Future open-ended surveys could identify specific needs of caregivers so that strategic interventions to reduce ethical debasement are designed.

We introduce “rural legal deserts,” or rural areas experiencing attorney shortages, as a meaningful health determinant. We demonstrate that the absence of rural attorneys has significant impacts on public health—impacts that are rapidly exacerbated by COVID-19. Our work builds on recent scholarship that underscores the public health relevance of attorneys in civil and criminal contexts. It recognizes attorneys as crucial to interprofessional health care teams and to establishing equitable health-related laws and policies. Attorney interventions transform institutional practices and help facilitate the stability necessary for health maintenance and recovery. Yet, critically, many rural residents cannot access legal supports. As more individuals experience unemployment, eviction, and insecure benefits amid the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for attorneys to address these social determinants of health as legal needs. Accordingly, the growing absence of attorneys in the rural United States proves particularly consequential—because of this pandemic context but also because of rural health disparities. We argue that unless a collaborative understanding of these interrelated phenomena is adopted, justice gaps will continue to compound rural health inequities.

Medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) allow providers to address patients' health-harming legal needs through partnerships with lawyers. MLPs are most successful in addressing the complex needs of vulnerable populations when clinicians, social workers, and other care team members regularly communicate with the MLP lawyer. Privacy laws and professional rules of conduct governing patient/client confidentiality, however, potentially hinder this exchange of patient-client information. MLP attorneys may be reluctant to share relevant information about a client with the medical partner for fear that doing so would breach client confidentiality or result in an ill-advised waiver of attorney-client privilege. Similarly, privacy concerns may lead providers to limit MLP attorneys' access to patients' medical information.Drawing on the real-world experiences of MLP professionals, this article explores whether legal and ethical obligations impede the sharing of patient-client information between MLPs' medical and legal partners. Our research indicates that at present patient/client confidentiality rules generally do not pose a significant barrier to doing so. However, current legal and professional standards may frustrate emerging advanced care coordination models that pair MLPs with care teams that comprehensively address a broad range of social, economic, and behavioral health needs. We therefore recommend continued monitoring and discussion of the issue.

The progress of transplantation in Poland is influenced not only by medical staff, but also by the legislative organ, which approves amendments to the Act of the Collection, Storage and Transplantation of Cells, Tissues and Organs. This is why young lawyers should be aware of the scale of the problem and have current statistics on transplant issues. Aim To assess the awareness of existing problems in the field of transplantation in Poland among law students. Materials and Methods A survey (with 11 questions) of 209 law students at the University of Bialystok (64% women and 36% men). Results Of respondents, 32% do not see the difference between dialysis treatment and transplantation, and 47% are convinced that the 5-year survival of dialysis patients is as much as 70% (in fact this number is twice as low). Still, 13% of people consider the stereotype of family consent for organ procurement is necessary. Of law students, 5% indicated that organ trafficking is allowed in Poland, and 41% believe that as many as 5% of people in Poland stated in writing opposition to removal of their organs after death. Fortunately, this number is much smaller (2%). The respondents have current knowledge about the place of Poland in the world in terms of the number of donors. Relatively good results were recorded in questions about medical knowledge. Conclusions In most questions, the correct answer obtained the highest score, but it was not an absolute majority. There is a trend among law students for an optimistic approach to statistics and the real problems in transplantology.

Genetic information is increasingly used in many contexts, including health, insurance, policing and sentencing—with numerous potential benefits and risks. Protecting from the related risks requires updates to laws and procedures by justice systems. These updates depend to a large extent on what the key stakeholders—the judiciary—know and think about the use of genetic information. This study used a battery of 25 genetic knowledge items to collect data from 73 supreme court judges from the same country (Romania) on their knowledge of genetic information. Their responses were compared with those of two other groups: lawyers (but not judges; N = 94) and non-lawyers (N = 116) from the same country. The data were collected at approximately the same time from the three groups. The judges’ results were also compared to the results obtained from a general population data collection (N = 5310). The results showed that: (1) judges had overall better knowledge of genetics than the other groups, but their knowledge was uneven across different genetic concepts; (2) judges were overall more confident in their knowledge than the other two groups, but their confidence was quite low; and (3) the correlation between knowledge and confidence was moderate for judges, weak for lawyers and not significant for non-lawyers. Finally, 100% of the judges agreed that information on gene-environment processes should be included in judges’ training. Increasing genetic expertise of the justice stakeholders is an important step towards achieving adequate legal protection against genetic data misuse.

AIM Labor and social security attorneys (LSSAs) are involved in the field of occupational mental health. However, little attention has been paid to the involvement of LSSAs in this field. This study investigated the occupational mental health competencies that are expected of LSSAs. SUBJECTS AND METHODS Our investigation utilized the Delphi method. In Step 1, we conducted semi-structured interviews with LSSAs and then created an initial list of competencies based on the interviews and a previous investigation. In Step 2, we recruited LSSAs with 10 or more cases related to occupational mental health. They completed a questionnaire assessing the importance of their work (how important they felt it was to conduct work related to mental health) and level of achievement (how much they felt they had achieved). The respondents were also asked to provide additional competencies (not listed on the questionnaire) if they regarded them as necessary for their work, and these were later added to the list of proposed competencies. In Step 3, we presented the results of Step 2 to the same respondents and asked them to rate their agreement with the proposed competencies. Items with agreement of 80% or higher were set as competencies. We also asked LSSAs about the level of importance of their work and their perceived level of achievement with regard to the additional items created in Step 2. Items for which the level of achievement fell below the median were extracted even if the level of importance of the work fell at or above the median. RESULTS We recruited 8 LSSAs in Step 1 and created a list of 68 preliminary competencies in 20 fields. We recruited 57 LSSAs in Step 2, and 45 LSSAs completed the survey (response rate: 78.9%). Seven competencies were added to the list as a result. We recruited 34 LSSAs in Step 3 (response rate: 75.6%) . Two items with an agreement rate of less than 80% were removed, resulting in 73 competencies in 20 fields. One of the items with an agreement rate of 100% was "The plan is based on the merits and disadvantages (risks) for both labor and management." CONCLUSIONS This study identified the competencies required of LSSAs in the field of occupational mental health. Our findings suggest that specifying these competencies will enable efficient training of LSSAs.

Knowledge plays an important role for the development of any economy, any business especially within the law profession which requires profound knowledge. Knowledge sharing behaviors may improve the performance of the work. The proposed study of this paper is conducted among 398 lawyers in Vietnam to assess the factors affecting the knowledge sharing behavior of lawyers. After analyzing data based on Smart PLS software, the results show that the knowledge sharing behavior of lawyers in Vietnam contributes to their jobs except for the development process according to the planned behavioral theory. At the same time, the paper examines the mediating role of behavioral intent for the relationship between attitude and knowledge-sharing behavior which is statistically significant. However, the level of information use does not have any statistically significant role for the relationship between intentional behavior and knowledge sharing behavior of lawyers in Vietnam.

The aim: Based on the research, to develop a scientific concept of medical and procedural aspects of restricting a person's right to physiological integrity related to the removal of prohibited items from his/her body and formulate recommendations for their implementation in law enforcement practice.Materials and methods: The empirical basis of the study were five decisions of the European Court of Human Rights, the results of a survey of prosecutors, investigators, and lawyers, processing of materials of criminal proceedings. The practical evidence of the authors, their advocacy, and service in the prosecutor's office was also taken into account. To demonstrate the method of prohibited substances' concealment in a human body, a photographic image was used based on the results of the examination of a person using a scanner conducted by customs officials. The methodological basis of the research is a complex combination of general-scientific and special methods, in particular, system-structural, comparative-legal; sociological; statistical; as well as the method of generalization.Conclusions: The removal of evidence from a person's body is a strip search. The basis for this investigative action should be a court decision, and in urgent cases, the prosecutor. This investigative action must be carried out with the obligatory participation of a physician. To this end, it is necessary to develop an appropriate medical protocol.

Past research showed that the ability to focus on one’s internal states (e.g., interoceptive ability) positively correlates with the self-regulation of behavior in situations that are accompanied by somatic and/or physiological changes, such as emotions, physical workload, and decision-making. The analysis of moral oriented decision-making can be the first step for better understanding the legal reasoning carried on by the main players in the field, as lawyers are. For this reason, this study investigated the influence of the decision context and interoceptive manipulation on the moral decision-making process in the legal field gathering the responses of two groups of lawyers. A total of 20 lawyers were randomly divided into an experimental group (EXP), which was explicitly required to focus the attention on its interoceptive correlates, and a control group (CON), which only received the general instruction to perform the task. Both groups underwent a modified version of the Ultimatum Game (UG), where are presented three different moral conditions (professional, company, and social) and three different offers (fair, unfair, and equal). Results highlighted a significant increase of Acceptance Rate (AR) in those offers that should be considered more equal than fair or unfair ones, associated with a general increase of Reaction Times (RTs) in the equal offers. Furthermore, the interoceptive manipulation oriented the Lawyers toward a more self-centered decision. This study shows how individual, situational, contextual, and interoceptive factors may influence the moral decision-making of lawyers. Future research in the so-called Neurolaw field is needed to replicate and expand current findings.

17 USC 105 interim-entered record; under review. The article of record as published may be found at http://dx.doi.org/doi10.1111/nejo.12394 Lawyers have broad discretion in deciding how honestly to behave when negotiating. We propose that lawyers’ choices about whether to disclose information to correct misimpressions by opposing counsel are guided by their moral character and their cognitive framing of negotiation. To investigate this possibility, we surveyed 215 lawyers from across the United States, examining the degree to which honest disclosure is associated with lawyers’ moral character and their tendency to frame negotiation in game-like terms—a construal of negotiation that we label game framing. We hypothesize that the more that lawyers view negotiation through a game frame—that is, the more they view negotiation as an adversarial context with arbitrary and artificial rules—the less honest they will be in situations in which honest disclosure is not mandated by professional rules of conduct. We further hypothesize that lawyers with higher levels of moral character will apply a game frame to negotiation to a lesser degree than will lawyers with lower levels of moral character, and that honesty when negotiating will be higher when lawyers have higher versus lower levels of moral character. Our study results support these hypotheses. This work suggests that focusing on game-like aspects of negotiation can induce a less moral and ethical mindset. To the extent that teaching law students to “think like a lawyer” encourages them to adopt a game frame of negotiation, we can expect such training to reduce the likelihood of honest disclosure. Taya R. Cohen’s work on this research was supported by grant #61842: The Honesty Project from the John Templeton Foundation.

Cases with international elements appear more and more frequently in the daily practice of Polish courts. They are related to the performance of the judging function (issuing judgments) and auxiliary activities (supporting the trial process, e.g. delivering correspondence, taking evidence abroad). Increasingly important in the judiciary is the correct and active application of European Union law, other international law and national law linked to foreign affairs. Polish courts and their staff are unable to handle international elements. Court employees are incompetent in the field of international services, avoid applying the rules of international law, and incorrectly perform international auxiliary activities. The problem is deficits in education, human and technical resources and the lack of connection with the outside world. Year by year, the Polish justice system alienates more and more from effective participation in international court cases. In the years 2016 to 2019, sociological and legal research was carried out among Polish lawyers, representatives of regional bar councils. As part of the interviews conducted using the method of in-depth structured interviews (SSI), a diagnosis, evaluation and explanation of the functioning of Polish court and non-judicial lawyers in the era of internationalization of the Polish justice system was made. The present article is an attempt to evaluate the international activity of Polish court lawyers (judges and other court employees).

En las monarquías modernas los letrados desempeñaron un papel fundamental, como autorizados artífices de principios doctrinales que guiaron la praxis política y jurisprudencial; como encarnadura de los oficios y organismos en los que sirvieron y cuyo perfil institucional contribuyeron a modelar; y, finalmente, como grupo socioprofesional incrustado en distintos sectores de la administración que, con sus actuaciones y modus operandi, fueron conformando un tipo específico de leales servidores del poder. El ejercicio de la judicatura y el aprovechamiento de las redes de influencia que ofrecía tal actividad propició, además, que en muchos casos pudieran protagonizar procesos de enriquecimiento personal y de ascenso social susceptibles de contribuir al encumbramiento familiar. El seguimiento de las actividades y estrategias desplegadas en varios ámbitos de su existencia por uno de esos letrados provincianos –de rango medio– al servicio de la monarquía hispánica, como fue el Dr. Luis de Ocaña, en el tránsito de los siglos XVI al XVII, permite calibrar su significación en el devenir no solamente de la historia político-institucional, sino también de su vertiente más propiamente sociocultural. Sin perder de vista el marco histórico en que el doctor Ocaña desplegó su intensa e influyente actividad, se destaca especialmente su labor como afamado jurisconsulto y eficiente servidor de la Corona en las misiones que le fueron encomendadas, sus exitosas estrategias de acumulación y gestión patrimonial y su persistente empeño por acreditarse y promocionarse en el estamento nobiliario hasta conseguir alcanzar posiciones que le situaron entre las élites del sur valenciano. In early modern monarchies, lawyers played a fundamental role as authorized architects of doctrinal principles that guided political and jurisprudential praxis; as the embodiment of the offices and organizations in which they served and whose institutional profile they helped to shape; and, finally, as a social-professional group embedded in different sectors of the administration that, with their actions and modus operandi, shaped a specific type of loyal servants of power. The exercise of the judiciary and the use of the networks of influence offered by such activity also led, in many cases, to personal enrichment and social advancement that could contribute to the rise of the family. The monitoring of the activities and strategies deployed in various areas of their existence by one of those provincial lawyers –of middle rank– at the service of the Hispanic Monarchy, such as Dr. Luis de Ocaña, in the transition from the sixteenth to the seventeenth century, allows us to gauge its significance in the evolution not only of the political-institutional history, but also of its more social-cultural aspect. Without losing sight of the historical framework in which Dr. Ocaña deployed his intense and influential activity, his work as a famous jurisconsult and efficient servant of the Crown in the missions that were entrusted to him, his successful strategies of accumulation and patrimonial management, and his persistent determination to accredit and promote himself in the nobiliary estate until he reached positions that placed him among the elites of the Valencian South are especially highlighted.

© 2019, © 2019 Taylor & Francis. Enduring powers of attorney (POAs) are commonly used legal instruments that enable older people to plan for asset management in the event of future incapacity. The policy objective of POAs–empowering control over money and property–are frustrated when POAs are misused to financially exploit older people. This commentary integrates theory and evidence to propose a conceptual framework for POA-facilitated financial exploitation (POA-FE). Identified risk factors include inadequate knowledge about the POA role; family conflicts; attitudes of entitlement; and lack of planning and preparation for financial decision-making. POA-FE occurs on a continuum of behavior and strategies for preventing POA-FE are suggested using strengths-based approaches for older people and their attorneys.

The authors are social workers and lawyers in an interprofessional setting providing legal and social services to detained immigrants in deportation proceedings who have serious mental health conditions. Drawing on direct experience working in the setting, as well as survey responses and feedback from other involved providers, the authors (a) identify barriers to self-care for social workers and lawyers that prevent them from effectively addressing the effects of secondary trauma; (b) propose a relationship-centered framework that, as an alternative to individualized practices of self-care, serves as a way to overcome those barriers; and (c) apply that framework to a case example from their interprofessional setting. The authors advocate for a relationship-centered, recovery-based approach to self-care to manage trauma exposure responses for social workers and lawyers in their specific interprofessional setting and for those working together in similar settings.