Search

Data-driven soft sensors are extensively used in industrial and chemical processes to predict hard-to-measure process variables whose real value is difficult to track during routine operations. The regression models used by these sensors often require a large number of labeled examples, yet obtaining the label information can be very expensive given the high time and cost required by quality inspections. In this context, active learning methods can be highly beneficial as they can suggest the most informative labels to query. However, most of the active learning strategies proposed for regression focus on the offline setting. In this work, we adapt some of these approaches to the stream-based scenario and show how they can be used to select the most informative data points. We also demonstrate how to use a semi-supervised architecture based on orthogonal autoencoders to learn salient features in a lower dimensional space. The Tennessee Eastman Process is used to compare the predictive performance of the proposed approaches., Comment: ICML 2022 Workshop on Adaptive Experimental Design and Active Learning in the Real World

Standard Control Chart techniques to detect level shift in data streams assume independence between observations. As data today is collected with high frequency, this assumption is seldom valid. To overcome this, we propose to adapt the off-line test procedure for detection of outliers based on one-step prediction errors proposed by Tsay (1988) into an on-line framework by considering a moving window. Further, we present two algorithms, that in combination, estimate an appropriate test value for our control chart. We test our method on AR(1) processes exposed to level shifts of different sizes and compare it to CUSUM applied to one-step prediction errors. We find that, even though both methods perform comparable when tuned correctly, our method has higher probability of identifying the correct change point of the process. Furthermore, for more complicated processes our method is easier to tune, as the range of window size to be tested is independent of the process., Comment: 14 pages, 8 figures and 1 table