Search

Your search keyword '"Jihad Kaouk"' showing total 123 results
Start Over Author "Jihad Kaouk" Language undetermined
123 results on '"Jihad Kaouk"'

2. Single-Port Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Where Do We Stand?

Author

Antonio Franco, Antony A. Pellegrino, Cosimo De Nunzio, Morgan Salkowski, Jamal C. Jackson, Lucas B. Zukowski, Enrico Checcucci, Srinivas Vourganti, Alexander K. Chow, Francesco Porpiglia, Jihad Kaouk, Simone Crivellaro, and Riccardo Autorino

Abstract

In 2018, the da Vinci Single Port (SP) robotic system was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for urologic procedures. Available studies for the application of SP to prostate cancer surgery are limited. The aim of our study is to summarize the current evidence on the techniques and outcomes of SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (SP-RARLP) procedures. A narrative review of the literature was performed in January 2023. Preliminary results suggest that SP-RALP is safe and feasible, and it can offer comparable outcomes to the standard multiport RALP. Extraperitoneal and transvesical SP-RALP appear to be the two most promising approaches, as they offer decreased invasiveness, potentially shorter length of stay, and better pain control. Long-term, high-quality data are missing and further validation with prospective studies across different sites is required.

Published
2023

3. Percutaneous Ablation vs Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Completely Endophytic Renal Masses: A Multicenter Trifecta Analysis with a Minimum 3-Year Follow-Up

Author

Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Alp T. Beksac, Ithaar Derweesh, Antonio Celia, Riccardo Schiavina, Lorenzo Bianchi, Giovanni Costa, Umberto Carbonara, Davide Loizzo, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Clara Cerrato, Ciro Imbimbo, Vicenzo Mirone, Jeffrey Elbich, Giuseppe Basile, Lance J. Hampton, Fernando J. Kim, Umberto Capitanio, Jihad Kaouk, and Riccardo Autorino

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

4. Minimally-Invasive Radical Nephrectomy and Left-Sided Level II Caval Thrombectomy: A New Combined Technique

Author

JJ H. Zhang, Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Ethan L. Ferguson, Alp Tuna Beksac, Zeyad R. Schwen, Alireza Aminsharifi, Mohamed Eltemamy, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
Urology
Abstract

To present a combined multiport robotic and open approach for left radical nephrectomy and inferior vena cava thrombectomy (IVCTE) in patients with a primary left renal mass and level II IVC tumor thrombus.A 69-year-old female was diagnosed with an 8.9cm left renal neoplasm with level II IVC thrombus. She was placed in the left-side-up flank position. The descending colon was mobilized and the left gonadal vein was identified. The left renal vein was identified and fully dissected. The left renal artery was dissected and stapled. The kidney was dissected and left detached with exception of the renal vein. The robot was undocked and the patient was positioned supine. Through a supra-umbilical midline incision, the ascending colon and duodenum were mobilized medially. The right renal vein and IVC were identified and dissected to the level of hepatic veins. The IVC was clamped using a Satinsky clamp. The right renal artery and vein remained patent during thrombectomy. The IVC was opened, the thrombus was evacuated, and IVC was closed. Clamps were removed and the kidney was removed.Operative time was 405 minutes. IVC clamp time was 14 minutes. Estimated blood loss was 500cc. Recovery was uncomplicated. Length of stay was 4 days. Pathology showed clear cell carcinoma with negative margins.IVCTE is challenging on left sided tumors. Combining a robotic and open technique together is feasible and allows a smaller supra-umbilical midline incision compared to standard open incision.

Published
2023

5. Percutaneous thermal ablation for cT1 renal mass in solitary kidney: A multicenter trifecta comparative analysis versus robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Author

Savio Domenico Pandolfo, Davide Loizzo, Alp T. Beksac, Ithaar Derweesh, Antonio Celia, Lorenzo Bianchi, Jeffrey Elbich, Giovanni Costa, Umberto Carbonara, Giuseppe Lucarelli, Clara Cerrato, Margaret Meagher, Pasquale Ditonno, Lance J. Hampton, Giuseppe Basile, Fernando J. Kim, Riccardo Schiavina, Umberto Capitanio, Jihad Kaouk, and Riccardo Autorino

Subjects
Oncology, Surgery, General Medicine
Abstract

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in solitary kidney (SK) represents a challenging scenario. We sought to compare outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) versus percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) in SK patients with renal tumors cT1.We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of SK patients treated for RCC. The PTA group included cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation. We collected baseline characteristics, intraoperative, pathological, and post-operative data. We applied an arbitrary composite "trifecta" to assess surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes, only for malignant histology. RFS analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent predictors of "trifecta" achievement.We included 198 SK patients (RAPN, n = 50; PTA n = 119). Mean clinical tumor size was not significantly different while R.E.N.A.L. score was higher for RAPN (p 0.001). No differences in intra and major post-procedural complications. Recurrence rate was higher in PTA group but not statistically significant (p 0.328). No difference in metastasis rate was found (p = 0.435). RFS was 96.1% in RAPN and 86.8% in PTA cohort (p = 0.003) while no difference in PFS was detected (p = 0.1). Trifecta was achieved in 72.5% of RAPN vs 77.3% of PTA (p = 0.481). Multivariable analysis has not detected predictors for Trifecta achievement.PTA offers good outcomes in the management of SK patients with RCC. Compared with RAPN, it might carry a higher risk of recurrence; on the other hand, re-treatment is possible. Overall, PTA can be safely offered to treat SK patients presenting RCC. In general, it should be preferred in more frail patients to minimize the risk of complications.

Published
2023

6. Single-port Extraperitoneal and Transperitoneal Radical Prostatectomy: A Multi-Institutional Propensity-Score Matched Study

Author

Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Alp Tuna Beksac, Ethan Ferguson, Aaron Kaviani, Marcio Covas Moschovas, Jean Joseph, Moses Kim, Simone Crivellaro, Jeffrey Nix, Vipul Patel, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
Urology
Abstract

To compare the perioperative and early postoperative outcomes between single-port (SP) extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (EPRP) and SP transperitoneal radical prostatectomy (TPRP), in a multi-institutional setting.We identified all patients who underwent SP robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at 6 different institutes. Data of 650 patients were collected and divided into 2 groups based on the surgical approach: SP EPRP or SP TPRP. A Propensity-score matched-pair analysis for body mass index (BMI), prostate size, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk was performed with a 1:1 ratio. Analysis of perioperative and postoperative outcomes was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.After matching, 238 patients were included in each arm. The median follow-up period was 7 and 6 months for EPRP and TPRP groups, respectively. The total operative time was longer in the EPRP group (206 vs 155 minutes, P.001). The EPRP group had a shorter length of hospitalization and same-day discharge rate compared to the TPRP approach (P.001). There was no difference in the overall intraoperative or postoperative complications rate between the 2 groups, nor positive surgical margin rates.The SP extraperitoneal approach is associated with a shorter hospital stay and higher rate of same-day discharge, with no difference in the surgical margin, or complication rates.

Published
2023

8. Transvesical versus extraperitoneal single-port robotic radical prostatectomy: a matched-pair analysis

Author

Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Alp Tuna Beksac, Ethan Ferguson, Aaron Kaviani, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
Male, Prostatectomy, Treatment Outcome, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Matched-Pair Analysis, Urology, Prostate, Humans, Prostatic Neoplasms, Laparoscopy
Abstract

To compare our initial perioperative and postoperative outcomes of the single-port (SP) transvesical radical prostatectomy (TVRP) approach with the single-port extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy (ERP) approach.Initial consecutive seventy-eight patients underwent SP TVRP between December 2020 and October 2021. Patients with extensive previous abdominal surgeries, or low- to intermediate-risk prostate cancer were selected. Data of consecutive 169 patients treated with SP ERP between February 2019 and November 2020, were used for comparison. Optimal matched-paired analysis of PSA value, biopsy Gleason score, and prostate volume was performed. Preoperative, perioperative, and early functional outcomes were included in the analysis. The median follow-up was 7 months and 9 months for TVRP and ERP groups respectively.The median total operative time was longer in the TVRP compared to the ERP group (p = .002). There were no differences in intraoperative complications or surgical margin status. TVRP group had less rate of grade 3a Clavien-Dindo complications (p = .026). The Foley catheter duration was 3 (3, 4) days in the TVRP group compared to 7 (7, 8) days in the ERP group (p .001). There was a consistently improved continence rate in the TVRP group at 6 weeks (72% TVRP, 48% ERP, p = .004), 3 months (97% TVRP, 81% ERP, p = .008), and 6 months postoperatively (100% TVRP, 93% ERP, p = .047). There was no difference in biochemical recurrence at 6 months of follow-up.In our initial series, TVRP allows for a faster continence recovery, without other functional or oncological compromises.

Published
2022

11. PD43-07 PARENCHYMAL VOLUME IS KING, BUT WHO ARE THE JESTERS?

Author

Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Kieran Lewis, Worapat Attawettayanon, João Pedro Emrich Accioly, Nityam Rathi, Zaeem Lone, Rebecca Campbell, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber, Mohamad Eltemamy, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi, Robert Abouassaly, Samuel Haywood, Christopher Weight, and Steven Campbell

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

12. PD07-11 PARTIAL VERSUS RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY FOR COMPLEX RENAL MASS: MULTICENTER COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES (ROSULA COLLABORATIVE GROUP)

Author

Clara Cerrato, Margaret F. Meagher, Riccardo Autorino, Giuseppe Simone, Bo Yang, Robert Uzzo, Francesco Porpiglia, Umberto Capitanio, James Porter, Alp T Beksac, Mimi Nguyen, Savio D Pandolfo, Kevin Hakimi, Luke Wang, Andrea Minervini, Clayton Lau, Monish Aron, Daniel Eun, Alexandre Mottrie, Aalst Belgium, Carmen Mir, Chandru Sundaram, Alessandro Antonelli, Jihad Kaouk, and Ithaar H Derweesh

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

15. PD27-06 SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN OVER 1,100 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS FROM THE MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL SPARC COLLABORATION

Author

Ethan Ferguson, Roxana Ramos, Graham Hale, Jennifer Nguyen, Marcio Moschovas, Samantha Wilder, Kennedy Okhawere, Ruth Sanchez De La Rosa, Alp Tuna Beksac, Indu Saini, James Peabody, Ketan K. Badani, Craig Rogers, Jean Joseph, Vipul Patel, Michael Stifelman, Jeffrey Nix, Moses Kim, Mutahar Ahmed, Simone Crivellaro, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

16. MP80-14 EXTRAPERITONEAL SINGLE-PORT ROBOTIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN OVER 700 PATIENTS: UPDATED MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT STUDY FROM THE SPARC COLLABORATION

Author

Ethan Ferguson, Jennifer L. Nguyen, Roxana Ramos, Grace Chen, Kennedy Okhawere, Samantha Wilder, Ruth Sanchez De La Rosa, Jaya Chavali, Indu Saini, James Peabody, Ketan K. Badani, Craig Rogers, Jeffrey Nix, Jean Joseph, Michael Stifelman, Simone Crivellaro, Mutahar Ahmed, Moses Kim, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

19. MP47-13 A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RETROPERITONEOSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY (RARPN) FOR ANTERIOR VS POSTERIOR RENAL TUMORS: A PROPENSITY SCORE MATCHED ANALYSIS IN A MULTI-INSTITUTIONAL COHORT

Author

Onika Noel, Harshit Garg, Kennedy Okhawere, Mukund Bhandari, Indu Saini, Laura Zuluaga, Ronney Abaza, Daniel D. Eun, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K. Hemal, James Porter, Michael D. Stifelman, Jihad Kaouk, Simone Crivellaro, Craig Rogers, Philip Pierorazio, Ketan K. Badani, and Ahmed Mansour

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

20. PD43-03 FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY AFTER PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY IN A SOLITARY KIDNEY

Author

Worapat Attawettayanon, Yosuke Yasuda, JJ Zhang, Nityam Rathi, Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Kieran Lewis, Ben Ponvilawan, Snehi Sha, Jianbo Li, Joao Accioly, Rebecca Campbell, Joseph Zabell, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber, Mohamad Eltemamy, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi, Robert Abouassaly, Christopher Weight, and Steven Campbell

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

21. PD43-06 FULLY AUTOMATED AI-GENERATED MODELS PREDICT POST-OPERATIVE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE AFTER RENAL SURGERY WITH SIMILAR ACCURACY TO A VALIDATED CLINICAL MODEL

Author

Nour Abdallah, Tarik Benidir, Nicholas Heller, Andrew Wood, Fabian Isensee, Resha Tejpaul, Chalairat Suk-Ouichai, Nityam Rathi, Diego Aguilar Palacios, Alex You, Erick Remer, Jihad Kaouk, Samuel Haywood, Venkatesh Kirshnamurthi, Steven Campbell, Nikolaos Papanikolopoulos, and Christopher Weight

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

23. PD43-04 MANAGEMENT OF RENAL MASS SOLITARY KIDNEY WITH HIGH TUMOR COMPLEXITY

Author

Worapat Attawettayanon, Yosuke Yasuda, JJ Zhang, Nityam Rathi, Carlos Munoz-Lopez, Kieran Lewis, Snehi Sha, Jianbo Li, Joao Accioly, Rebecca Campbell, Jihad Kaouk, Georges-Pascal Haber, Mohamad Eltemamy, Venkatesh Krishnamurthi, Robert Abouassaly, Christopher Weight, and Steven Campbell

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

28. PD09-06 15-YEAR OUTCOMES OF ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL RADICAL CYSTECTOMY CONSORTIUM

Author

Usma Shabir, Jorge Daza, Grace Harrington, Mohammad Khan, Zuha Jaffar, Muhsinah Howlader, Claire Hannon, Zhe Jing, Jihad Kaouk, Bertram Yuh, James Peabody, Johar Raza Syed, Prokar Dasgupta, Mohammed Shamim Khan, Michael Stöckle, Eric Kim, Koon Rha, Peter Wiklund, Abolfazl Hosseini, Qiang Li, Ahmed A. Hussein, and Khurshid A. Guru

Subjects
Urology
Published
2023

33. Percutaneous Ablation

Author

Savio Domenico, Pandolfo, Alp T, Beksac, Ithaar, Derweesh, Antonio, Celia, Riccardo, Schiavina, Lorenzo, Bianchi, Giovanni, Costa, Umberto, Carbonara, Davide, Loizzo, Giuseppe, Lucarelli, Clara, Cerrato, Ciro, Imbimbo, Vicenzo, Mirone, Jeffrey, Elbich, Giuseppe, Basile, Lance J, Hampton, Fernando J, Kim, Umberto, Capitanio, Jihad, Kaouk, and Riccardo, Autorino

Published
2022

34. Microwave versus cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation for small renal mass: a multicenter comparative analysis

Author

Savio D. PANDOLFO, Umberto CARBONARA, Alp T. BEKSAC, Ithaar DERWEESH, Antonio CELIA, Riccardo SCHIAVINA, Jeffrey ELBICH, Giuseppe BASILE, Lance J. HAMPTON, Clara CERRATO, Giovanni COSTA, Lorenzo BIANCHI, Giuseppe LUCARELLI, Vincenzo MIRONE, Ciro IMBIMBO, Fernando J. KIM, Francesco DEL GIUDICE, Umberto CAPITANIO, Jihad KAOUK, and Riccardo AUTORINO

Subjects
Nephrology, Urology
Abstract

Ablative techniques emerged as effective alternative to nephron-sparing surgery for treatment of small renal masses. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoablation (CRYO) are the two guidelines-recommended techniques. Microwave ablation (MWA) represents a newer technology, less described. Aim of the study was to compare outcomes of MWA to those of CRYO and RFA.Retrospective investigation of patients who underwent MWA, CRYO, or RFA from seven high-volume US and European centers was performed. The first group included patients who underwent CRYO or RFA; the second MWA. We collected baseline characteristics, clinical, intraoperative and post-operative data. Oncological data included technical success, local recurrence, and progression to metastasis. Multivariate analysis was performed to find predictors for postoperative complications. A composite outcome of "trifecta" was used to assess surgical, functional, and oncological outcomes.739 patients underwent CRYO or RFA and 50 MWA. CRYO/RFA group had significantly longer operative time (p.001), but no difference in LOS, post-procedural Hb mean, intra-procedural complications (p=0.180), overall post-procedural complication rates (p=0.126), and in the 30-day re-admission rate (p=0.853) were detected. No predictive parameter of postprocedural complications was found. Concerning functional outcome no differences were detected in terms of eGFR at 1yr (p=0.182), ΔeGFR at 1-yr (p= 0.825) and eGFR at latest follow-up (p=0.070). "Technical success" was achieved in 98.6% of the cases (MWA= 100%, CRYO/RFA= 98.5%; p=0.775), and there was no significant difference in terms of 2-yr recurrence rate (p= 0.114) and metastatic progression (p= 0.203). Trifecta was achieved in 73.0% of CRYO/RFA vs 69.6% of MWA cases (p = 0.719).MWA is a safe and effective treatment option for small renal masses. Compared with CRYO/RFA, it seems to offer low complication rates, shorter operation time, and equivalent surgical and functional outcomes.

Published
2022

35. A Propensity-Matched Comparison of the Perioperative Outcomes Between Single-Port and Multi-Port Robotic Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Report from the Single Port Advanced Research Consortium (SPARC)

Author

Kennedy E. Okhawere, Alp Tuna Beksac, Michael P. Wilson, Talia G. Korn, Kirolos N. Meilika, Robert Harrison, Luca Morgantini, Mutahar Ahmed, Reza Mehrazin, Ronney Abaza, Daniel D. Eun, Akshay Bhandari, Ashok K. Hemal, James Porter, Michael D. Stifelman, Jihad Kaouk, Simone Crivellaro, and Ketan K. Badani

Subjects
Urology
Published
2022

36. Analysis of Complications After Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Between 2002-2021

Author

Holly Ann Houenstein, Zhe Jing, Ahmed S. Elsayed, Yousuf O. Ramahi, Michael Stöckle, Carl Wijburg, Abolfazl Hosseini, Peter Wiklund, Eric Kim, Jihad Kaouk, Prokar Dasgupta, Mohammed S. Khan, Andrew A. Wagner, Johar R. Syed, James O. Peabody, Ketan Badani, Lee Richstone, Alexandre Mottrie, Thomas J. Maatman, Derya Balbay, Juan P. Redorta, Koon Ho Rha, Franco Gaboardi, Morgan Rouprêt, Ahmed Aboumohamed, Ahmed A. Hussein, and Khurshid A. Guru

Subjects
Urology
Abstract

To identify trends in complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) using a multi-institutional database, the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium (IRCC).A retrospective review of the IRCC database was performed (2976 patients, 26 institutions from 11 countries). Postoperative complications were categorized as overall or high grade (≥ Clavien Dindo III) and were further categorized based on type/organ site. Descriptive statistics was used to summarize the data. Multivariate analysis (MVA) was used to identify variables associated with overall and high-grade complications. Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to describe the trend of complications over time.1777 (60%) patients developed postoperative complications following RARC, 51% of complications occurred within 30 days of RARC, 19% between 30-90 days, and 30% after 90 days. 835 patients (28%) experienced high-grade complications. Infectious complications (25%) were the most prevalent, while bleeding (1%) was the least. The incidence of complications was stable between 2002-2021. Gastrointestinal and neurologic postoperative complications increased significantly (P.01, for both) between 2005 and 2020 while thromboembolic (P = .03) and wound complications (P.01) decreased. On MVA, BMI (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.05, P.01), prior abdominal surgery (OR 1.26, 95%CI 1.03-1.56, P = .03), receipt of neobladder (OR 1.52, 95%CI 1.17-1.99, P.01), positive nodal disease (OR 1.33, 95%CI 1.05-1.70, P = .02), length of inpatient stay (OR 1.04, 95%CI 1.02-1.05, P.01) and ICU admission (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.36-2.06, P.01) were associated with high-grade complications.Overall and high-grade complications after RARC remained stable between 2002-2021. GI and neurologic complications increased, while thromboembolic and wound complications decreased.

Published
2022

37. Redo Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Recurrent Renal Tumors: A Multi-Institutional Analysis

Author

Alp Tuna Beksac, Umberto Carbonara, Mahmoud Abou Zeinab, Margaret Meagher, Sij Hemal, Alessandro Tafuri, Gabriele Tuderti, Alessandro Antonelli, Riccardo Autorino, Giuseppe Simone, Ithaar H. Derweesh, and Jihad Kaouk

Subjects
redo, renal cell carcinoma, recurrence, Urology, Robotics, Kidney, Nephrectomy, Kidney Neoplasms, Treatment Outcome, salvage, Robotic Surgical Procedures, outcome, Humans, robotic partial nephrectomy, Retrospective Studies
Published
2022

41. MP50-15 DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF AN OBJECTIVE SCORING TOOL FOR ROBOT ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY: SCORING FOR PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY (SPAN)

Author

Umar Iqbal, Philippa Doherty, Ahmed S. Elsayed, Zhe Jing, Craig Rogers, Ronald Boris, James Porter, Mohammad Allaf, Ketan K. Badani, Michael Stifelman, Jihad Kaouk, Tomoaki Terakawa, Nobuyuki Hinata, Ahmed A. Aboumohamed, Eric C. Kauffman, Qiang Li, Ronney Abaza, Khurshid A. Guru, Ahmed A. Hussein, Daniel Eun, and Ayat Shah

Subjects
Urology
Published
2022

50. MP03-04 ANALYSIS OF COMPLICATIONS AFTER ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL CYSTECTOMY BETWEEN 2005-2020: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL ROBOTIC CYSTECTOMY CONSORTIUM

Author

Holly Houenstein, Umar Iqbal, Zhe Jing, Ahmed S. Elsayed, Yousuf Ramahi, Michael Stöckle, Carl Wijburg, Abolfazl Hosseini, Peter Wiklund, Eric Kim, Jihad Kaouk, Prokar Dasgupta, Mohammed S. Khan, Andrew A. Wagner, Johar R. Syed, James O. Peabody, Ketan K. Badani, Lee Richstone, Alexandre Mottrie, Thomas J. Maatman, Derya Balbay, Juan P. Redorta, Koon Ho Rha, Franco Gaboardi, Morgan Roupret, Ahmed Aboumohamed, Ahmed A. Hussein, and Khurshid A. Guru

Subjects
Urology
Published
2022

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results