1. Remote Follow-Up Technologies in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Scoping Review
- Author
-
Brandon G. Smith, Stasa Tumpa, Orla Mantle, Charlotte J. Whiffin, Harry Mee, Davi J. Fontoura Solla, Wellingson S. Paiva, Virginia F.J. Newcombe, Angelos G. Kolias, Peter J. Hutchinson, Newcombe, Virginia [0000-0001-6044-9035], Kolias, Angelos [0000-0003-3992-0587], Hutchinson, Peter [0000-0002-2796-1835], and Apollo - University of Cambridge Repository
- Subjects
follow-up technology ,Technology ,patient-generated health data ,traumatic brain injury ,Brain Injuries, Traumatic ,Humans ,Reproducibility of Results ,Neurology (clinical) ,outcome assessment ,innovation ,Telemedicine ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Motivations for outcome data collection in TBI are threefold: to improve patient outcomes, to facilitate research, and to provide the means and methods for wider injury surveillance. Such data play a pivotal role in population health, and ways to increase the reliability of data collection following TBI should be pursued. As a result, technology-aided follow-up of patients with neurotrauma is on the rise; there is, therefore, a need to describe how such technologies have been used. A scoping review was conducted and reported using the PRISMA extension (PRISMA-ScR). Five electronic databases (Embase, MEDLINE, Global Health, PsycInfo, and Scopus) were searched systematically using keywords derived from the concepts of "telemedicine," "TBI," "outcome assessment," and "patient-generated health data." Forty studies described follow-up technologies (FUTs) utilizing telephones (52.5%,in =/i 21), short message service (SMS; 10%,in =/i 4), smartphones (22.5%,in =/i 9), videoconferencing (10%,in =/i 4), digital assistants (2.5%,in =/i 1), and custom devices (2.5%,in =/i 1) among cohorts of patients with TBI of varying injury severity. Where reported, clinical facilitators, remote follow-up timing and intervals between sessions, synchronicity of follow-up instances, proxy involvement, outcome measures utilized, and technology evaluation efforts are described. FUTs can aid more temporally sensitive assessments and capture fluctuating sequelae, a benefit of particular relevance to TBI cohorts. However, the evidence base surrounding FUTs remains in its infancy, particularly with respect to large samples, low- and middle-income patient cohorts, and the validation of outcome measures for deployment via such remote technology.
- Published
- 2022