Search

The aims of this Oncoplastic Breast Consortium and European Breast Cancer Research Association of Surgical Trialists initiative were to identify uncertainties and controversies in axillary management of early breast cancer and to recommend appropriate strategies to address them. By use of Delphi methods, 15 questions were prior-itized by more than 250 breast surgeons, patient advocates and radiation oncologists from 60 countries. Sub-sequently, a global virtual consensus panel considered available data, ongoing studies and resource utilization. It agreed that research should no longer be prioritized for standardization of axillary imaging, de-escalation of axillary surgery in node-positive cancer and risk evaluation of modern surgery and radiotherapy. Instead, expert consensus recommendations for clinical practice should be based on current evidence and updated once results from ongoing studies become available. Research on de-escalation of radiotherapy and identification of the most relevant endpoints in axillary management should encompass a meta-analysis to identify knowledge gaps, fol-lowed by a Delphi process to prioritize and a consensus conference to refine recommendations for specific trial designs. Finally, treatment of residual nodal disease after surgery was recommended to be assessed in a pro-spective register.

Over the last years, prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction has undergone a renaissance due to several technical advancements regarding mastectomy techniques and surgical approaches for the placement and soft tissue coverage of silicone implants. Initially abandoned due to the high incidence of complications, such as capsular contraction, implant extrusion, and poor aesthetic outcome, the effective prevention of these types of complications led to the prepectoral technique coming back in style for the ease of implant placement and the conservation of the pectoralis muscle function. Additional advantages such as a decrease of postoperative pain, animation deformity, and operative time contribute to the steady gain in popularity. This review aims to summarize the factors influencing the trend towards prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction and to discuss the challenges and prospects related to this operative approach.

Einleitung: Bisher existiert kein in vivo Modell zur Analyse der Mikrozirkulation von Brandwunden und des angrenzenden kritisch durchbluteten Gewebes. Ziel dieser Studie war es, ein Modell zu etablieren, das die wiederholte Untersuchung der Mikrozirkulation während der Wundheilung nach Verbrennung[for full text, please go to the a.m. URL], 127. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

BACKGROUND: Shockwave (SW) application has been shown to limit flap necrosis. However, the underlying microhemodynamic mechanisms remain unclear. Therefore, the objective of this study was to analyze the effect of SW application on a microcirculatory level. METHODS: We treated 12 C57BL/6 mice with local SW application (500 shockwave impulses at 0.15 mJ/mm(2)) either 24 h before (preconditioning [PRE]) or 30 min after (postconditioning [POST]) flap elevation. Animals with an untreated flap (CON) or without a flap served as controls. We applied dorsal skinfold chambers to the animals and performed epifluorescence microscopy over a 10-d period to assess microcirculatory parameters (arteriolar diameter, red blood cell velocity, blood flow, functional capillary density, and intercapillary distance) as well as inflammation, apoptotic cell death, and necrosis. RESULTS: SW application significantly decreased tissue necrosis independently of the application time point (PRE: 29% ± 7%; POST: 25% ± 7% versus CON: 47% ± 2%; day 10, P < 0.05). Arteriolar diameter, red blood cell velocity, and blood flow were not statistically significantly different among the 3 flap groups. However, SW (PRE and POST) resulted in an early and persistent increase in functional capillary density and consequently decreased intercapillary distance compared with CON and the group without a flap (P < 0.05). Also, SW resulted in a significantly decreased inflammatory response (P < 0.05) and induced an angiogenic response, as indicated by new functional microvessel formation observed 5 d after therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Local SW application improved tissue survival by recruitment of sleeping capillaries within the non ischemic tissue and maintenance of capillary perfusion within the critically perfused tissue after induction of ischemia, which was independent of the application time point. Neoangiogenesis occurred beyond the ischemic tolerance of the tissue, and therefore does not seem to contribute to improved tissue survival.