Search

Summary Background PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors are active in metastatic urothelial carcinoma, but positive randomised data supporting their use as a first-line treatment are lacking. In this study we assessed outcomes with first-line pembrolizumab alone or combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for patients with previously untreated advanced urothelial carcinoma. Methods KEYNOTE-361 is a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial of patients aged at least 18 years, with untreated, locally advanced, unresectable, or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of up to 2. Eligible patients were enrolled from 201 medical centres in 21 countries and randomly allocated (1:1:1) via an interactive voice-web response system to intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks for a maximum of 35 cycles plus intravenous chemotherapy (gemcitabine [1000 mg/m2] on days 1 and 8 and investigator's choice of cisplatin [70 mg/m2] or carboplatin [area under the curve 5] on day 1 of every 3-week cycle) for a maximum of six cycles, pembrolizumab alone, or chemotherapy alone, stratified by choice of platinum therapy and PD-L1 combined positive score (CPS). Neither patients nor investigators were masked to the treatment assignment or CPS. At protocol-specified final analysis, sequential hypothesis testing began with superiority of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the total population (all patients randomly allocated to a treatment) for the dual primary endpoints of progression-free survival (p value boundary 0·0019), assessed by masked, independent central review, and overall survival (p value boundary 0·0142), followed by non-inferiority and superiority of overall survival for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in the patient population with CPS of at least 10 and in the total population (also a primary endpoint). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment). This study is completed and is no longer enrolling patients, and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT02853305 . Findings Between Oct 19, 2016 and June 29, 2018, 1010 patients were enrolled and allocated to receive pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (n=351), pembrolizumab monotherapy (n=307), or chemotherapy alone (n=352). Median follow-up was 31·7 months (IQR 27·7–36·0). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy did not significantly improve progression-free survival, with a median progression-free survival of 8·3 months (95% CI 7·5–8·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 7·1 months (6·4–7·9) in the chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78, 95% CI 0·65–0·93; p=0·0033), or overall survival, with a median overall survival of 17·0 months (14·5–19·5) in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group versus 14·3 months (12·3–16·7) in the chemotherapy group (0·86, 0·72–1·02; p=0·0407). No further formal statistical hypothesis testing was done. In analyses of overall survival with pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy (now exploratory based on hierarchical statistical testing), overall survival was similar between these treatment groups, both in the total population (15·6 months [95% CI 12·1–17·9] with pembrolizumab vs 14·3 months [12·3–16·7] with chemotherapy; HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·77–1·11) and the population with CPS of at least 10 (16·1 months [13·6–19·9] with pembrolizumab vs 15·2 months [11·6–23·3] with chemotherapy; 1·01, 0·77–1·32). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse event attributed to study treatment was anaemia with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (104 [30%] of 349 patients) or chemotherapy alone (112 [33%] of 342 patients), and diarrhoea, fatigue, and hyponatraemia (each affecting four [1%] of 302 patients) with pembrolizumab alone. Six (1%) of 1010 patients died due to an adverse event attributed to study treatment; two patients in each treatment group. One each occurred due to cardiac arrest and device-related sepsis in the pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group, one each due to cardiac failure and malignant neoplasm progression in the pembrolizumab group, and one each due to myocardial infarction and ischaemic colitis in the chemotherapy group. Interpretation The addition of pembrolizumab to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy did not significantly improve efficacy and should not be widely adopted for treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma. Funding Merck Sharp and Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.

55 Background: Tumor shrinkage and disease control with preservation or improvement in quality of life are the primary treatment goals for patients with unresectable mCRC. When not possible, emphasis lies in slowing disease progression and prolonging survival. Advances in mCRC treatment have now improved survival to an average of 30 months in clinical trials. Here, we present initial baseline treatment patterns from the PROMETCO study (NCT03935763), the first international, prospective real-world study to investigate the continuum of care in the mCRC population, collecting data on all patients regardless of treatment. Methods: Enrolment in PROMETCO began in March 2019. On October 1, 2020, systemic treatment characteristics from 277 mCRC patients were analyzed. Adult patients with two disease progressions since the first diagnosis of metastatic disease who were willing to receive subsequent treatment were included. Treatments started prior to study inclusion were analyzed by line and by patients’ molecular status (RAS/BRAF and MSI). Results: In the overall population, first-line treatment data were available for 257 patients. Doublet/triplet chemotherapy (dt/t CT) + anti-VEGF/EGFR therapy was received by 70% (180) of patients, and 20% (51) received dt/t CT alone, in contrast to current guidelines. At second line (n = 209), 68% (142) of patients received dt/t CT + anti-VEGF/EGFR therapy. The proportion of dt/t CT given alone was consistent between first and second line. Median duration of treatment decreased with progressing line of treatment (mirrored in the molecular status subgroups). In the RAS/BRAF patient population, 14% (40) had unknown status at inclusion, 0.7% (2) were RAS/BRAF mutant (mut), and the BRAF mut subgroup had too few numbers from which to draw conclusions. The proportion of patients receiving dt/t CT alone was higher in the RAS mut (23%; 31/135) vs RAS/BRAF WT (12%; 9/76) groups. Dt/t CT + anti-VEGF was received by 64% (87/135) and 21% (16/76) of the RAS mut and RAS/BRAF WT patients, respectively. There were no unexpected results in treatments received between molecular groups at second line, nor in terms of the length of treatment. Fifty percent of the population had unknown MSI status, and MSI low/high groups had too few numbers from which to draw conclusions. The treatment distribution in MSS patients at first line (n = 124) and second line (n = 102) followed a similar trend to the overall population. Conclusions: Preliminary data from PROMETCO provide key insights as to the treatments received by real-world mCRC patients. Further analysis of patients in a larger cohort will be important to better understand discrepancies in treatment choice (ie adherence to guidelines), and country-based differences in testing/reimbursement, which may help elucidate the missing data seen in the molecular-status subgroups. Clinical trial information: NCT03935763.

REGARD and RAINBOW were global, phase 3, randomized, double-blind trials of second-line ramucirumab for metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Exploratory subgroup analyses were described to assess the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab in REGARD and RAINBOW in young (≤ 45 and 65 years) and elderly (≥ 65, ≥ 70, and ≥ 75 years) patients.Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive ramucirumab plus best supportive care or placebo plus best supportive care (REGARD) or 1:1 to ramucirumab plus paclitaxel or placebo plus paclitaxel (RAINBOW). Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plots assessed efficacy and adverse events by age groups for ramucirumab versus placebo.The hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival favored treatment with ramucirumab: REGARD ≤ 45 years (HR: 0.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.27-1.26), 65 years (0.80, 0.59-1.10), ≥ 65 years (0.72, 0.48-1.08), ≥ 70 years (0.73, 0.44-1.23), and ≥ 75 years (0.59, 0.25-1.37); and RAINBOW ≤ 45 years (0.56, 0.33-0.93), 65 years (0.78, 0.63-0.97), ≥ 65 years (0.88, 0.66-1.18), and ≥ 70 years (0.88, 0.60-1.28). The exception was elderly patients aged ≥ 75 years in RAINBOW (0.97, 0.47-2.01); however, patient numbers were low in this subgroup (n = 36). Similar findings were observed for progression-free survival, for which HRs numerically favored ramucirumab-treated patients. Adverse events (including grade ≥ 3) were not associated with age.In comparison with placebo, ramucirumab conferred improvements in efficacy across age groups with a tolerable safety profile. Despite some limitations, these exploratory analyses support the use of ramucirumab in advanced gastric cancer, irrespective of age.

4 Background: Andecaliximab (ADX) is a monoclonal antibody that inhibits matrix metalloproteinase 9, an extracellular enzyme involved in matrix remodeling, tumor growth, and metastasis. A phase I/Ib study of mFOLFOX6 + ADX revealed encouraging antitumor activity in patients (pts) with gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma (median first-line, progression-free survival [PFS] of 9.9 months). Methods: This phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter study investigated the efficacy and safety of mFOLFOX6 with/without ADX in pts with untreated HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Randomization was 1:1 to mFOLFOX6 + ADX or mFOLFOX6 + placebo (PBO). Oxaliplatin was administered on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle (total of 6 cycles), followed by leucovorin and 5-fluorouracil dosing on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day treatment cycle until disease progression. ADX/PBO 800 mg was infused on Days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle until disease progression. The study had 85% power (one-sided significance of 0.025) to detect a hazard ratio of 0.7 for overall survival (OS) by intention-to-treat analysis using the log-rank test. Secondary endpoints were PFS, objective response rate (ORR, RECIST 1.1), and safety. Results: Between September 2015 and May 2017, 432 pts were randomized; 218 pts to ADX and 214 pts to PBO. Median (95% CI) OS was 12.5 (11.2, 14.0) vs 11.8 (10.3, 13.5) months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively (HR 0.93 [0.74, 1.18], two-sided p=0.56). Median PFS was 7.5 vs 7.1 months in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively (HR 0.84 [0.672, 1.038], two-sided p=0.10). Median investigator assessed ORR was 50.5% vs 41.1% in the ADX and PBO groups, respectively (two-sided p=0.049). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea, diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. There were no meaningful differences in the safety profile of the ADX vs PBO groups. Subgroup analysis is ongoing. Conclusion: Additionof ADX to mFOLFOX6 does not improve OS in pts with untreated HER2-negative gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. Clinical trial information: NCT02545504.

Summary Background Angiogenesis is an important therapeutic target in colorectal carcinoma. Ramucirumab is a human IgG-1 monoclonal antibody that targets the extracellular domain of VEGF receptor 2. We assessed the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab versus placebo in combination with second-line FOLFIRI (leucovorin, fluorouracil, and irinotecan) for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with disease progression during or after first-line therapy with bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, and a fluoropyrimidine. Methods Between Dec 14, 2010, and Aug 23, 2013, we enrolled patients into the multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 RAISE trial. Eligible patients had disease progression during or within 6 months of the last dose of first-line therapy. Patients were randomised (1:1) via a centralised, interactive voice-response system to receive 8 mg/kg intravenous ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI or matching placebo plus FOLFIRI every 2 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxic effects, or death. Randomisation was stratified by region, KRAS mutation status, and time to disease progression after starting first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01183780.ld Findings We enrolled 1072 patients (536 in each group). Median overall survival was 13·3 months (95% CI 12·4–14·5) for patients in the ramucirumab group versus 11·7 months (10·8–12·7) for the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·844 95% CI 0·730–0·976; log-rank p=0·0219). Survival benefit was consistent across subgroups of patients who received ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI. Grade 3 or worse adverse events seen in more than 5% of patients were neutropenia (203 [38%] of 529 patients in the ramucirumab group vs 123 [23%] of 528 in the placebo group, with febrile neutropenia incidence of 18 [3%] vs 13 [2%]), hypertension (59 [11%] vs 15 [3%]), diarrhoea (57 [11%] vs 51 [10%]), and fatigue (61 [12%] vs 41 [8%]). Interpretation Ramucirumab plus FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo plus FOLFIRI as second-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. No unexpected adverse events were identified and toxic effects were manageable. Funding Eli Lilly.

The comparative effects of discontinuing total parenteral nutrition (TPN: caloric ratio of glucose:fat:amino acid = 50:30:20) abruptly or in a stepwise manner on spontaneous food intake were investigated in two studies. Study 1: In 16 rats, TPN was given for 4 days, then stopped abruptly in eight rats. In the other eight rats, TPN was tapered; they received TPN at 75%, 50%, and 25% of their mean daily energy requirements per day for 3 consecutive days, and then switched to normal saline. Total parenteral nutrition induced a significant 60% reduction in spontaneous food intake (SFI) in both groups during the first TPN day. After 4 days of TPN, an 80% decrease in SFI had occurred in both groups. Resumption of SFI was significantly sooner in the abruptly-stopping group than in the stepwise-stopping group. But, in the latter group, there was a significantly greater cumulative caloric intake during the entire study. Study 2: In 32 rats, TPN providing either 100%, 50%, or 25% of their mean daily caloric requirements was given to three groups each of eight rats, for 3 days, then abruptly changed to normal saline; control rats received normal saline throughout. The TPN-induced decrease in SFI was proportional to the caloric density of the solution infused. Three days of 100%, 50%, or 25% TPN infusion led to an approximate 85%, 60%, or 35% decrease in SFI, respectively. Spontaneous food intake recovery was independent of the caloric density of TPN.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Total parenteral nutrition (TPN), providing the equivalent of 100% of mean daily oral intake for 24 hours, depressed spontaneous food intake (SFI) in rats by a mean greater than 80%. Whether TPN had the same effect on SFI when given either in 12-hour cycles (Cyclic-TPN) or in 24 hours (Continuous-TPN) for 8 days was tested in 16 rats with jugular catheters, placed in metabolic cages modified with an Automated Computerized Rat Eater Meter. This continuously measures food intake and its dependent indexes: meal number, meal size, meal duration, meal sniffs and intermeal sniffs. Both rat groups ate the same amounts of chow before TPN. On starting TPN, food intake decreased by greater than 80% in Cyclic-TPN and greater than 50% in Continuous-TPN during each first infusion period. A nadir in food intake was reached in 48 hours with Cyclic-TPN and in 72 hours with Continuous-TPN. Thereafter, there was no food intake during the 12 hours of Cyclic-TPN, with minimal food intake during the intervening 12 hours of non-TPN normal saline infusion period. In both forms of TPN infusion, a reduction in food intake was achieved by a reduction in meal number and size, and thus in meal duration. Feeding-related sniffing activity was decreased by similar amounts with Cyclic- or Continuous-TPN. Cyclic-TPN for 12 hours had no advantage over Continuous-TPN, in that there was no compensatory enhancement of food intake and meal-related behavior during the cyclic non-TPN normal saline period.

Whether spontaneous food intake (SFI) is controlled by infused nutrient type or its caloric content, irrespective of nutrient type, was investigated. Rats were infused for 4 days with isocaloric solutions of different nutrient type but sharing the same intermediary metabolic oxidative pathway, providing 25% of daily caloric needs. One parenteral solution was a glucose, fat and amino acid mix (TPN-25%); the other provided ketone bodies (TRO-3.5%). Effects of parenteral infusions on SFI and metabolic concomitants were compared and contrasted to that in a group of orally fed rats. Both infusions reduced SFI by 50%. Rats receiving TRI-3.5% had lower blood glucose and insulin concentrations, but increased hepatic glycogen content compared to TPN-25% or orally fed rats. No differences in hepatic triglycerides occurred between the three groups. However, serum free fatty acids were significantly lower in TRI-3.5% and in TPN-25% groups vs. fed rats. Data indicate food intake suppression is mediated by caloric content rather than nutrient type, suggesting that a mediator of SFI regulation could be at the citric acid cycle level.