1. Is There Indication for the Use of Biological Mesh in Cancer Patients?
- Author
-
Renato Patrone, Maddalena Leongito, Raimondo di Giacomo, Andrea Belli, Raffaele Palaia, Alfonso Amore, Vittorio Albino, Mauro Piccirillo, Carmen Cutolo, Sergio Coluccia, Aurelio Nasto, Giovanni Conzo, Anna Crispo, Vincenza Granata, and Francesco Izzo
- Subjects
ventral hernia ,oncological patients ,ventral hernia repair ,abdominal wall ,mesh ,biological mesh ,General Medicine - Abstract
Up to 28% of all patients who undergo open surgery will develop a ventral hernia (VH) in the post-operative period. VH surgery is a debated topic in the literature, especially in oncological patients due to complex management. We searched in the surgical database of the Hepatobiliary Unit of the National Cancer Institute of Naples “G. Pascale Foundation” for all patients who underwent abdominal surgery for malignancy from January 2010 to December 2018. Our surgical approach and our choice of mesh for VH repair was planned case-by-case. We selected 57 patients that fulfilled our inclusion criteria, and we divided them into two groups: biological versus synthetic prosthesis. Anterior component separation was used in 31 patients (54.4%) vs. bridging procedure in 26 (45.6%). In 41 cases (71.9%), we used a biological mesh while a synthetic one was adopted in the remaining patients. Of our patients, 57% were male (33 male vs. 24 female) with a median age of 65 and a mean BMI of 30.8. We collected ventral hernia defects from 35 cm2 to 600 cm2 (mean 205.2 cm2); 30-day complications were present in 24 patients (42.1%), no 30-day mortality was reported, and 21 patients had a recurrence of pathology during study follow-up. This study confirms VH recurrence risk is not related with the type of mesh but is strongly related with BMI and type of surgery also in oncological patients.
- Published
- 2022