Search

Aims Cryoballoon (CB) based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is a widely used technique for treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF); however the ideal energy dosing has not yet been standardized. This was a single-centre randomized clinical trial aiming at assessing the safety, acute efficacy, and clinical outcome of an individualized vs. a fixed CB ablation protocol using the fourth-generation CB (CB4) guided by pulmonary vein (PV) potential recordings and CB temperature. Methods and results Patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to two different dosing protocols: INDI-FREEZE group (individualized protocol): freeze-cycle duration of time to effect plus 90 s or interruption of the freeze-cycle and repositioning CB if a CB temperature of −30°C was not within 40 s. Control group (fixed protocol): freeze-cycle duration of 180 s. No-bonus freeze-cycle was applied in either patient group. The primary endpoint was freedom from atrial tachyarrhythmia at 12 months. Secondary end points included procedural parameters and complications. A total of 100 patients with paroxysmal AF were prospectively enrolled. No difference was seen in the primary endpoint [INDI-FREEZE group: 38/47 (81%) vs. control group: 40/47, (85%), P = 0.583]. The total freezing time was significantly shorter in the INDI-FREEZE group (157 ± 56 s vs. 212 ± 83 s, P < 0.001), while procedure duration (57.9 ± 17.9 min vs. 63.2 ± 20.2 min, P = 0.172) was similar. No differences were seen in the minimum CB and oesophageal temperatures as well as in periprocedural complications. Conclusion Compared to the fixed protocol, the individualized approach provides a similar safety profile and clinical outcome, while reducing the total freezing time.

Aims Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) often is not sufficient in patients (pts) with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Substrate modification (SM) by catheter ablation (CA) of low-voltage zones (LVZ) has yielded favourable results, but those studies were performed before the introduction of contact force (CF) sensing technology. Surgical ablation (SA) studies support the hypothesis that empiric bi-atrial linear ablation (Cox Maze IV procedure) is able to improve success, but there is less data on outcome of patients undergoing left atrial (LA) linear lesions alone. In current guidelines, both CA and SA have Class IIa indication in pts with persistent AF. In this single-centre retrospective study, we analysed the long-term outcomes of CA and SA in pts with persistent AF. Methods and results In the CA group (Figure 1), pts underwent PVI and additional SM in the presence of LVZ (roof line and supero-septal line) using TactiCath™ or SmartTouch™ ablation catheters aiming at contact values ≥10 g 400 g/s. Ablation was performed in a temperature-controlled fashion with energy of 30 W except at the posterior wall (20–25 W). In the SA group (Figure 2), pts underwent ablation procedure (creation of a pure LA endocardial lesion set consistent with the Cox Maze IV) performed by a right mini-thoracotomy approach using the Atricure™ cryoablation probe, a left atrial appendage (LAA) epicardial exclusion using the Atriclip™ system, and mitral valve repair in the presence of severe mitral valve regurgitation. No right atrial lesions were created. 196 pts were included. 120 pts underwent CA [median age: 65 (58–72) years, median LA volume index (LAVI): 66 (56–75) ml/m2], in pts with LVZs PVI + SM was performed [bidirectional block of lines in 100%]. 76 pts underwent SA [median age: 64 (58–74) years, median LAVI 90 (78–103) ml/m2], in 42 pts a mitral valve repair was performed. At 24 months (figure), 89% and 68% of pts were free of AF in the SA and CA group, respectively, mainly without antiarrhythmic drugs (92% SA group and 89% CA group). Conclusions In patients with persistent AF, SA performed by a right mini-thoracotomy approach with linear lesions limited to LA leads to excellent 2-year freedom from AF despite significantly larger LAVI compared with the CA group. LAA epicardial exclusion likely contributed to surgical efficacy by eliminating the LAA as trigger/driver.

Introduction: Although pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (PVI) is very effective in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF), in patients (pts) with persistent AF, PVI often is not sufficient. Many studies suggested that low voltage zones (LVZs) outside of the PV might be involved in the complex mechanisms perpetuating AF. However ablation strategies involving substrate modification (SM) did not show additional benefits in persistent AF pts. Those studies were performed before the introduction of contact force technology, and the most likely explanation for these results could be the inability to achieve effective transmural lesions and continuous linear ablation. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that the use of contact force technology would improve ablation efficacy. Therefore, we analyzed the long-term outcome after two different ablation strategies in pts with persistent AF depending on whether there was evidence of LVZs in the left atrium or not. Methods: The presence of LVZs were defined as sites of >3 adjacent low-voltage points 400g/s. Ablation was performed in a temperature-controlled fashion with energy of 30W except at the posterior wall (20-25W). Results: 121 consecutive pts with persistent AF (46 female, median age 66 [59-72] years, mean duration of AF 16 [7-73] months, CT derived LA volume index 66 [56-75]ml/m2) were included: pts without LVZs underwent PVI alone (n = 74), in pts with LVZs, PVI + SM (n = 47) was performed (mitral Isthmus line in 2, supero-septal line in 39, and roof line in 47; bidirectional block was achieved in 100%, 97%, and 100%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 13 [6-21] months, 86% of pts without and 78% with substrate were in sinus rhythm, mainly without antiarrhythmic drugs (89% PVI only, 84% PVI + SM). Conclusions: In patients with persistent AF without LVZs, PVI alone leads to excellent 2-year freedom from AF. In pts with LVZs, additional substrate modification with CF sensing technology is associated with improved success rates compared to previous studies.

Background Pulmonary vein isolation is the cornerstone of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, with advanced left atrial (LA) structural changes, additional targeted catheter ablation of low voltage zones (LVZs) has produced favorable results. Therefore, with the advent of single-shot techniques, it would be helpful to predict the presence of LVZs before an ablation procedure. Objective We hypothesized that computed tomography-derived (CT) left atrial volume index (LAVI), in combination with other objective parameters, could be used to develop a score able to predict the presence of LVZs. Methods In a large cohort of patients undergoing their first AF ablations, comprehensive echocardiographic evaluations and cardiac CT were performed. During the electrophysiological studies, LA geometry and electro-anatomic voltage maps were created. LVZs were defined as areas ≥1cm2 with bipolar peak-to-peak voltage amplitudes ≤0.5 mV. Results In a derivation cohort of 374 patients, predictors of LVZs were identified by regression analysis and used to build the ZAQ score (age≥65 years, female sex and CT LAVI≥57ml/m2). The ZAQ score of 2 points accurately identified the presence and the extent of LVZs (AUC 0.809, 95% CI 0.758-0.861, p Conclusions The ZAQ score identifies LVZs and may be useful for planning the ablation strategy ahead of time (single shot PVI vs 3D mapping-guided ablation) regardless of whether the AF pattern is paroxysmal or persistent. Figure legend. Proposed AF ablation workflow independent of the temporal pattern of AF (ie. paroxysmal vs. persistent). (CT) Computed Tomography, (LAVI) Left Atrial Volume Index, (PVI) Pulmonary vein isolation. *Low voltage zones, if present, could be targeted with additional substrate modification ablation Conflict of Interest None