Search

BACKGROUND The authors performed a randomized trial comprising patients with metastatic breast carcinoma (MBC). They used a noninferiority design to evaluate whether the results of sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel were not markedly worse than the concomitant administration in terms of objective response rates (ORRs). Toxicity profile, quality of life (QOL), and pharmacoeconomic evaluations were evaluated as well. METHODS In the current study, 202 patients with MBC were randomized to receive either the combination of epirubicin at a dose of 90 mg/m2 plus paclitaxel at a dose of 200 mg/m2 for 8 cycles (concomitant arm, n = 108) or epirubicin at a dose of 120 mg/m2 for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel at a dose of 250 mg/m2 over 3 hours for 4 cycles every 21 days (sequential arm, n = 94). RESULTS The authors rejected the null hypothesis that the sequential treatment is less active than the standard concomitant regimen (ORRs: concomitant = 58.5%, sequential = 57.6%). The median progression-free and overall survival periods were 11.0 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 9.7–12.3) and 20.0 months (95% CI, 17.2–22.6), respectively, in the concomitant arm and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.9–13.6) and 26 months (95% CI, 18.1–33.8), respectively, in the sequential arm (P = not significant). Patients who received the sequential regimen experienced a higher incidence of Grade 3/4 (according to the World Health Organization grading system) neutropenia (62.2% of courses vs. 50.62%; P = 0.003) and Grade ≥ 2 neuropathy (45.5% vs. 30.4% of patients; P = 0.03), whereas 6 patients who received the concomitant regimen developed Grade II cardiotoxicity according to New York Heart Association criteria. QOL analyses failed to provide clear differences. CONCLUSIONS The sequential administration of epirubicin and paclitaxel at full doses was found to be as active as their association. Therefore, both the sequential and the combined administration were acceptable options. Cancer 2004. © 2004 American Cancer Society.

From June 1990 to October 1994, 111 advanced ovarian cancer patients with minimal (less than 2 cm) residual disease after platinum-based front-line chemotherapy and second-look laparotomy entered a cooperative randomized study aimed at evaluating the effectiveness and the toxicity of the addition of interferon-α2 to carboplatin, both intraperitoneally (ip) administered. Patients were randomized to receive either 3 courses of ip Carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 Day 1 q 28 days (54 pts) (CBDCA) or ip interferon-α 25 × 10 6 U Day 1 + ip carboplatin 400 mg/m 2 Day 2 q 28 days (57 pts) (CBDCA + IFN). Patients treated with interferon experienced more severe (WHO grade 3–4) leukopenia (28% vs 17.1%) and anemia (14% vs 4.2%). Fever ( P = 0.000) and flu-like syndrome ( P = 0.02) were significantly more frequent in the combination arm. No difference in gastroenteric, neurologic, or renal toxicity was observed. At a median follow-up time of 13 months (range 1–72) 71 patients showed a disease progression (31 CBDCA, 40 CBDCA + IFN) and 44 patients died (21 CBDCA, 23 CBDCA + IFN). Median progression-free survival was 11 months in the CBDCA group and 10 months in the CBDCA + IFN arm. Median survival was 22 and 29 months in CBDCA and CBDCA + IFN arm, respectively. In conclusion, intraperitoneal interferon-α does not seem to improve the results achievable with intraperitoneal carboplatin in this subset of patients, while the toxicity and the costs of the combination are consistently higher than with chemotherapy alone.

87 patients with high risk of recurrence FIGO stage I and II ovarian carcinoma were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of cisplatin 50 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1 every 28 days for 6 courses. Toxicity and efficacy of the regimen was evaluated after a median follow-up of 45 months. Treatment-related toxicity was mild and reversible, consisting chiefly of acute WHO grade 2 myelosuppression (10% of patients) and controllable grade 3 emesis (55%). No late toxicity was observed. Actuarial 7-year survival and relapse-free survival (RFS) were 76% and 61%, respectively; a statistically significant difference in outcome was observed for undifferentiated grade tumour (G1 vs. G2 vs. G3: P less than 0.01) but not for FIGO stage disease (stage I vs. stage II). In our opinion, short-term chemotherapy including the most active single agent, i.e. cisplatin, appears a tolerable and effective treatment which deserves further evaluation in large randomised trials.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether an accelerated-intensified cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil (CEF) chemotherapy regimen with the support of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) induces a higher activity and efficacy compared with standard CEF in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Stage IV breast cancer patients were randomized to receive as first-line chemotherapy either standard CEF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, epirubicin 60 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2) administered every 21 days (CEF21) or accelerated-intensified CEF (cyclophosphamide 1,000 mg/m2, epirubicin 80 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 600 mg/m2) administered every 14 days (HD-CEF14) with the support of G-CSF. Treatment was administered for eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 151 patients were randomized (74 patients on the CEF21 arm and 77 on the HD-CEF14 arm). In both arms, the median number of administered cycles was eight. The dose-intensity actually administered was 93% and 86% of that planned, in CEF21- and HD-CEF14–treated patients, respectively. Compared with the CEF21 arm, the dose-intensity increase in the HD-CEF14 arm was 80%. Both nonhematologic and hematologic toxicities were higher in the HD-CEF14 arm than in the CEF21 arm. During chemotherapy, four deaths occurred in the HD-CEF14 arm. No difference in overall response rate (complete plus partial responses) was observed: 49% and 51% in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P = .94). A slightly non–statistically significant higher percentage of complete response was observed in the HD-CEF14 arm (20% v 15%). No difference in efficacy was observed. The median time to progression was 14.3 and 12.8 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P = .69). Median overall survival was 32.7 and 27.2 months in the CEF21 and HD-CEF14 arms, respectively (P = .16). CONCLUSION: In metastatic breast cancer patients, an 80% increase in dose-intensity of the CEF regimen, obtained by both acceleration and dose intensification, does not improve the activity and the efficacy compared with a standard dose-intensity CEF regimen.

From 1982 through 1996, 547 untreated advanced ovarian cancer patients were entered onto Gruppo Oncologico Nord-Ovest (GONO) consecutive randomized trials including cisplatin-based chemotherapy. End points of analysis included the influence of age on prognosis, toxicity, clinical/surgical response rates, progression-free survival and survival. Of the entire study group, 116 patients were 65 years of age or older at diagnosis. WHO main toxicity (any grade) consisted of: emesis (93% of patients), myelotoxicity (leukopenia in 52%, anemia in 51% and thrombocytopenia in 17% of patients), nephrotoxicity in 13% of patients and neurotoxicity in 10% of patients. No significant difference in toxicity was evident between patientsor = or65 years. Refusal of CT and early (or =2 courses) interruption of CT due to toxicity were more frequent in elderly patients (3.4 vs. 1.4%; 3.4 vs. 0.7%, respectively). After a median follow-up of 71 months no difference was observed in survival and progression-free survival between younger and older patients. Cox multiple regression analysis of the entire study population demonstrated that age65 years per se was not a negative prognostic factor.

Administration of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) is followed by a rapid increase in the proliferative activity of the hematopoietic precursors. Within 72 hours after its suspension, however, establishment of a negative feedback results in a reduction of the proliferative activity of the hyperplastic marrow to values below the baseline, suggesting refractoriness of hematopoietic progenitors to the action of cell-cycle-specific cytostatic agents.The hypothesis that short treatment with GM-CSF before chemotherapy could reduce the hematopoietic toxicity of cytostatics was investigated by administering GM-CSF glycosylate (Sandoz, Basel, Switzerland/Schering-Plough, Kenilworth, NJ) subcutaneously with a 5.5 micrograms/kg protein dosage per day from day-6-day-4 before each course of adjuvant chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil/cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil alternate) in patients with node-positive breast cancer. Twelve patients were randomized to receive GM-CSF before chemotherapy or only at chemotherapy. The hematologic picture and dose intensity of chemotherapy were compared in the two groups of patients.In the group of patients receiving chemotherapy only, 22% of the cycles had to be postponed because of leukopenia, with a consequent reduction of the dose intensity, whereas in the GM-CSF group, the neutrophil counts remained at significantly (P0.001) higher levels, and there were no delays in chemotherapy administration. No substantial systemic toxicity was associated with this brief GM-CSF schedule. Moreover, GM-CSF treatment did not result in delayed depletion of the hematopoietic pool.Short treatment with GM-CSF can enable the dose intensity of conventional protocols of proven efficacy to be increased.

Thirty patients with bulky advanced ovarian cancer surgically not resectable, received combination chemotherapy (median of 4.1 cycles; range, 3-7) including cisplatin or carboplatin, followed by a second surgical effort. Clinical CR+PR was observed in 24/30 (80 %) patients after chemotherapy. Our study deals only with these 24 patients, and the 6 patients who did not respond to chemotherapy are not part of this report. At debulking, 7/24 (29.1 %) patients had a complete macroscopic resection; 9/24 (37.5 %) patients had a partial resection (residual tumor

The present phase III trial was carried out to verify whether a kinetic recruitment induced by low doses of diethylstilbes-trol (DES) could increase the killing efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced breast cancer. One-hundred and seventeen untreated patients with locally advanced breast cancer (stage IIIA/IIIB) were randomized to receive 3 courses of primary chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/m2 i.v.), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 i.v.) and fluorouracil (600 mg/m2 i.v.) (CAF) on day 1, or DES-CAF (DES, 1 mg orally days 1-3, CAF on day 4). The courses were repeated every 3 weeks. The patients who achieved an objective response were submitted to mastectomy followed by 3 courses of CAF alternated with 3 courses of CMF (cyclophosphamide, 600 mg/m2 i.v.; methotrexate, 40 mg/m2 i.v.; fluorouracil, 600 mg/m2 i.v.), with or without DES. The two treatment arms were well balanced in terms of clinical and pathologic features. There was no significant difference in response rates to induction chemotherapy between the two treatment arms (objective response rate, 63.3% for CAF and 56.1% for DES-CAF). Median overall survival was 49 and 47 months and median progression-free survival was 24 and 21 months for CAF and DES-CAF patients, respectively. Toxicity was not significantly different in the two groups, with the exception of leukopenia: DES chemotherapy was significantly more myelotoxic than the standard treatment, which resulted in a significant reduction in the actual dose intensity. In spite of the attractive experimental evidence, we conclude that so far there is no clinical advantage in the combination of estrogen and chemotherapy. Further research is needed to investigate different schedules of chemotherapy and hor-mones, or to test the possibility of combining various mitogens.