Search

Background: A significant increased risk of complications and mortality in immunocompromised patients affected by COVID-19 has been described. However, the impact of COVID-19 in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients is an issue still on debate, due to conflicting evidence emerged from different observational studies. Objective: We performed a systematic review with meta-analysis to assess the clinical outcome in SOT recipients with COVID-19 compared to general population. Data source: PubMed-MEDLINE and Scopus were independently searched until 13 October 2021. Study eligibility criteria: Prospective or retrospective observational studies comparing clinical outcome in SOT recipients versus general populations affected by COVID-19. Primary endpoint was 30-day mortality. Participants: Patients with confirmed COVID-19. Intervention: Solid organ transplant recipients. Assessment of risk of bias: Quality of included studies was independently assessed according to ROBINS-I tool for observational studies. Methods of data synthesis: Meta-analysis was performed by pooling odds ratio (OR) retrieved from studies providing adjustment for confounders using a random-effect model with inverse variance method. Multiple subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate source of heterogeneity. Results: 3,501 articles were screened, and thirty-one observational studies (N=590,375; 5,759 SOT recipients vs. 584,616 general population) were included in the meta-analyses. No difference in 30-day mortality rate was found in primary analysis including studies providing adjustment for confounders (N=17; 3,752 SOT recipients vs. 159,745 general population; OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.94-1.35; I2=33.9%). No evidence of publication bias was reported. Higher risk of ICU admission (OR 1.56, 95%CI 1.03-2.63) and occurrence of acute kidney injury (OR 2.50 95%CI 1.81-3.45) was found in SOT recipients. Conclusions: No increased risk in mortality was found in SOT recipients affected by COVID-19 compared to general population when adjusted for demographic and clinical features and COVID-19 severity.

Infection control programs and antimicrobial stewardship have been proven effective in reducing the burden of diseases due to multidrug-resistant organisms, but quantifying the effect of each intervention is an open issue. For this aim, we propose a model to characterize the effect of interventions at single ward level. We adapted the Ross-Macdonald model to describe hospital cross-transmission dynamics of carbapenemase-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, considering healthcare workers as the vectors transmitting susceptible and resistant pathogens among admitted patients. The model parameters were estimated from a literature review, further adjusted to reproduce observed clinical outcomes, and validated using real life data from a 2-year study in a university hospital. The model has been further explored through extensive sensitivity analysis, in order to assess the relevance of single interventions as well as their synergistic effects. Our model has been shown to be an effective tool to describe and predict the impact of interventions in reducing K. pneumoniae colonisations and infections, and can be extended to other specific hospital and pathological scenarios to produce tailored estimates of the most effective strategies.

BackgroundAntimicrobial surveillance and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) are essential pillars in the fight against antimicrobial resistance (AMR), but practical guidance on how surveillance data should be linked to AMS activities is lacking. This issue is particularly complex in the hospital setting due to structural heterogeneity of hospital facilities and services. The JPIAMR ARCH and COMBACTE-MAGNET EPI-Net networks have joined efforts to formulate a set of target actions for linking surveillance data with AMS activities.MethodsA scoping review of the literature was carried out addressing research questions on three areas: (i) AMS leadership and accountability; (ii) antimicrobial usage and AMS; (iii) AMR and AMS. Consensus on the target actions was reached through a RAND-modified Delphi process involving over 40 experts in different fields from 18 countries.ResultsEvidence was retrieved from 51 documents. Initially 38 targets were proposed, differentiated as essential or desirable according to clinical relevance, feasibility and applicability to settings and resources. In the first consultation round, preliminary agreement was reached for 32 targets. Following a second consultation, 27 targets were approved, 11 were deleted and 4 were suggested for rephrasing, leading to a final approved list of 34 target actions in the form of a practical checklist.ConclusionsThis White Paper provides a pragmatic and flexible tool to guide the development of calibrated hospital-surveillance-based AMS interventions. The strength of this tool is that it is a comprehensive perspective that takes into account the hospital patient case-mix and the related epidemiology, which ultimately drives antimicrobial usage, and the feasibility in low-resource settings.

In recent years, there have been significant developments in rapid diagnostic techniques (RDTs) in microbiology for the diagnosis of infectious diseases. By providing a more rapid diagnosis, RDTs have the potential to affect diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decisions. In addition to “antibiotic stewardship,” the term “diagnostic stewardship” has recently been coined in clinical practice and denotes the promotion of a rational implementation of diagnostic tests with a view to improving the quality of care and safely reducing cost. This review explores the advancement of diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship in the implementation of RDTs and describes the most relevant related clinical applications in Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs), bloodstream infections (BSIs), and respiratory infections. An innovative evidence-based RDT diagnostic algorithm that varies according to the presence of pre-agreed institutional criteria significantly increases testing accuracy for differentiating CDIs from carriage status. Evidence on BSIs reveals that pairing RDTs and antibiotic stewardship eases timely and appropriate utilization of RDTs results that may improve the clinical outcomes by optimizing antibiotic use. Data on clinical implications of RDTs targeting antibiotic-resistant Gram-negative and respiratory infections are scarce and inconclusive. Intertwining the role of diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship is crucial to optimizing RDTs utilization, by ensuring that RDTs are rationally selected and implemented, and results correctly interpreted and applied to clinical practice. Further research is needed to explore the clinical implications of RDT implementation.

Antibiotic stewardship (AS) is a cornerstone of the fight against antimicrobial resistance; however, evidence on the best practice to improve antibiotic prescription in various hospital settings is still scarce. This study aimed to measure the efficacy of a non-restrictive AS intervention in the internal medicine area of a tertiary-care hospital across a 3-year period.The intervention comprised a 3-month 'intensive phase' based on education and guidelines provision, followed by 9 months of audits and feedback activities. The primary outcome was the overall antibiotic consumption measured as days of therapy (DOTs) and defined daily doses (DDDs). Secondary outcomes were carbapenem and fluoroquinolone consumption, all-cause in-hospital mortality, length of stay, incidence of Clostridioides difficile and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bloodstream infections (CRE-BSIs). All outcomes were measured in the intervention wards comparing the pre-phase with the post-phase using an interrupted time-series model.A total of 145 337 patient days (PDs) and 14 159 admissions were included in the analysis. The intervention was associated with reduced DOTs*1000PDs (-162.2/P = 0.005) and DDDs*1000PDs (-183.6/P ≤ 0.001). A sustained decrease in ward-related antibiotic consumption was also detected during the post-intervention phase and in the carbapenem/fluoroquinolone classes. The intervention was associated with an immediate reduction in length of stay (-1.72 days/P0.001) and all-cause mortality (-3.71 deaths*100 admissions/P = 0.002), with a decreasing trend over time. Rates of Clostridioides difficile infections and CRE-BSIs were not significantly impacted by the intervention.The AS intervention was effective and safe in decreasing antibiotic consumption and length of stay in the internal medicine area. Enabling prescribers to judicious use of antimicrobials through active participation in AS initiatives is key to reach sustained results over time.

SARS-CoV-2 serological tests are used to assess the infection seroprevalence within a population. This study aims at assessing potential biases in estimating infection prevalence amongst healthcare workers (HCWs) when different diagnostic criteria are considered. A multi-site cross-sectional study was carried out in April–September 2020 amongst 1.367 Italian HCWs. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence was assessed using three diagnostic criteria: RT-PCR on nasopharyngeal swab, point-of-care fingerprick serological test (POCT) result and COVID-19 clinical pathognomonic presentation. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the probability of POCT-positive result in relation to the time since infection (RT-PCR positivity). Among 1.367 HCWs, 69.2% were working in COVID-19 units. Statistically significant differences in age, role and gender were observed between COVID-19/non-COVID-19 units. Prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection varied according to the criterion considered: 6.7% for POCT, 8.1% for RT-PCR, 10.0% for either POCT or RT-PCR, 9.6% for infection pathognomonic clinical presentation and 17.6% when at least one of the previous criteria was present. The probability of POCT-positive result decreased by 1.1% every 10 days from the infection. This study highlights potential biases in estimating SARS-CoV-2 point-prevalence data according to the criteria used. Although informative on infection susceptibility and herd immunity level, POCT serological tests are not the best predictors of previous COVID-19 infections for public health monitoring programmes.

Scope: this guideline addresses the indications for direct testing of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in asymptomatic individuals in health care facilities, with the aim to prevent SARS-CoV-2 transmissions in these settings. The benefit of testing asymptomatic individuals to create a safe environment for patients and health care workers must be weighed against potential unintended consequences, including delaying necessary treatments owing to false positive results and lower quality of care owing to strict isolation measures. Methods: a total of nine PICOs (population, intervention, comparison, outcome) on the topic of testing asymptomatic individuals was selected by the panel members. Subsequently, a literature search for existing guidelines and systematic reviews was performed on PubMed, Epistemonikos, and RecMap using relevant filters available in each database. Data on article/recommendation type, setting, target population, intervention, and quality of the evidence were extracted. Credibility of the systematic reviews was evaluated using the AMSTAR tool, and level of agreement with available recommendation was evaluated with the AGREE II score. Because the evidence available from systematic reviews was deemed insufficiently updated to formulate relevant recommendations, an additional search targeting relevant guidance documents from major public health institutions and original studies was performed. Provisional recommendations were discussed via web conferences until agreement was reached, and final recommendations were formulated according to the grade approach. Recommendations: recommendations were formulated regarding systematic testing in asymptomatic individuals upon admission to a health care setting, during hospital stay, before elective procedures, and before scheduled nonsurgical procedures. Moreover, recommendations regarding testing of asymptomatic visitors, personal caregivers, and health care workers in health care facilities were presented. Recommendations also were given on contact tracing in asymptomatic patients or health care workers and the possibility of a negative screening test to shorten the quarantine period. Furthermore, if applicable, recommendations were specified to transmission rate and vaccination coverage., NA

The impact of inappropriate empirical antibiotic therapy (IEAT) on the outcome of severe infections due to extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-Ent) remains unclear. Current evidence is limited by study design and lack of confounder control. The main objective of this study was to define the outcome of severe infections due to ESBL-Ent according to clinical parameters and place of infection acquisition. Adult hospitalised patients with ESBL-Ent infections were included in a 3-year multicentre prospective study. Primary outcomes were IEAT rates and crude mortality of severe infections, adjusted by place of acquisition [community-acquired infection (CAI), healthcare-associated infection (HCAI) and hospital-acquired infection (HAI)]. Among 729 patients, 519 (71.2%) were diagnosed with HAI, 176 (24.1%) with HCAI and 34 (4.7%) with CAI. Moreover, 32.9% of patients received IEAT; higher rates of IEAT were observed in pneumonia (23%) and deep surgical site infections (19%). HCAIs were more frequently associated with IEAT than HAIs (48.3% vs. 27.9%; OR = 1.7, 95% CI 1.2–2.4). The overall mortality rate for severe infections (n = 264) was 12.1% and was significantly higher in HCAIs (20%) than HAIs (10%) (RR = 2.3, 95% CI 1.01–5.3). IEAT significantly increased the risk of mortality in bloodstream infections (RR = 8.3, 95% CI 2–46.3). Rates of IEAT and overall mortality of ESBL-Ent severe infections were higher in HCAIs than HAIs. Prompt diagnosis of patients with severe HCAIs due to ESBL-Ent is essential since these infections receive high rates of IEAT and significantly higher mortality than HAIs [ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00404625].

Background: The combination of antibiotics has become the clinicians’ preferred strategy for the treatment of sepsis due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) although the evidence supporting its use is weak. This systematic review aimed at critically evaluating all available antibiotic options for CR-GNB sepsis with particular focus on combination. Methods: Comparative and non-comparative observational studies, randomized control trials (RCTs) and case series were considered eligible with no language restriction. Studies were included if reporting microbiologically-confirmed sepsis caused by Acinetobacter baumannii, Enterobacterales/Klebsiella spp., or Pseudomonas aeruginosa, reporting at least one of the study outcome and targeted antibiotic treatment. Carbapenem-resistance was defined as phenotypically-detected in vitro resistance to at least one of the following carbapenems: doripenem, ertapenem, imipenem, meropenem. Primary outcomes were 30-day and attributable mortality. Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was selected to explore feasibility of pooling data on antibiotic regimens. Results: A total of 6306 records were retrieved and 134 studies (11546 patients) were included [54 studies on Acinetobacter, 52 on Enterobacterales/Klebsiella, 21 on mixed Gram-negative, and 7 on Pseudomonas]. Nine (7%) were RCTs; 19 prospective cohorts (14%), 89 (66%) retrospective and 17 (13%) case series. Forty-one studies (31%) were multicentric. Ninety-two distinct regimens were identified with 47 (51%, 5863 patients) not reporting any details on combination. 30-day mortality was assessed in 65 (48%) studies while attributable mortality was reported only in 19 (14%).The NMAs were not applicable for any of selected outcomes given the presence of too many disconnected components. Conclusion: The existing evidence is too weak for allowing formulating any evidence-based therapeutic recommendation for combination of antibiotics to treat CR-GNB sepsis. Future studies must clearly define number, type, dosages, and in vitro activity of each antibiotic included in the regimen to drive recommendations for using combination of antibiotics that might be reliably applied into clinical practice.

Klebsiella pneumoniae has accumulated a wide range of resistance determinants and has evolved into a difficult-to-treat pathogen that poses an increasing healthcare threat. KPC is an important marker for extensively drug-resistant (XDR) organisms with limited treatment options. In response to the medical need for new treatment options, several new antibiotics have been developed and registered recently. The β-lactamase inhibitor (BLI) combinations ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam, the cephalosporin–siderophore conjugate cefiderocol, the aminoglycoside derivative plazomicin and the tetracycline derivative eravacycline, focus on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales. These modified agents from old antibiotic classes illustrate the challenges of this requirement to address class-specific resistance mechanisms while critical gaps and some cross-resistance within a class, or to unrelated antibiotic classes, remain. The diverse molecular mechanisms and increasing diversification of carbapenem resistance among Klebsiella isolates requires improved rapid molecular diagnostic capabilities and stringent stewardship programmes to preserve the efficacy of new antibiotics for as long as possible.

PRAISE network: Maaike S. M. van Mourik, Stephanie M.van Rooden, Mohamed Abbas, Olov Aspevall, Pascal Astagneau, Marc J. M. Bonten, Elena Carrara, Aina Gomila-Grange, Sabine C. de Greeff , Sophie Gubbels, Wendy Harrison, Hilary Humphreys, Anders Johansson, Mayke B. G. Koek, Brian Kristensen, Alain Lepape, Jean-Christophe Lucet, Siddharth Mookerjee, Pontus Naucler, Zaira R. Palacios-Baena, Elisabeth Presterl, Miquel Pujol, Jacqui Reilly, Christopher Roberts, Evelina Tacconelli, Daniel Teixeira, Thomas Tängdén, John Karlsson Valik, Michael Behnke, PetraGastmeier., [Introduction] Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) are a major public health concern. Monitoring of HAI rates, with feedback, is a core component of infection prevention and control programmes. Digitalization of healthcare data has created novel opportunities for automating the HAI surveillance process to varying degrees. However, methods are not standardized and vary widely between different healthcare facilities. Most current automated surveillance (AS) systems have been confined to local settings, and practical guidance on how to implement large-scale AS is needed., [Methods] This document was written by a task force formed in March 2019 within the PRAISE network (Providing a Roadmap for Automated Infection Surveillance in Europe), gathering experts in HAI surveillance from ten European countries., [Results] The document provides an overview of the key e-health aspects of implementing an AS system of HAI in a clinical environment to support both the infection prevention and control team and information technology (IT) departments. The focus is on understanding the basic principles of storage and structure of healthcare data, as well as the general organization of IT infrastructure in surveillance networks and participating healthcare facilities. The fundamentals of data standardization, interoperability and algorithms in relation to HAI surveillance are covered. Finally, technical aspects and practical examples of accessing, storing and sharing healthcare data within a HAI surveillance network, as well as maintenance and quality control of such a system, are discussed., [Conclusions] With the guidance given in this document, along with the PRAISE roadmap and governance documents, readers will find comprehensive support to implement large-scale AS in a surveillance network., This network has been supported under the 7th transnational call within the Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance (JPIAMR), Network Call on Surveillance (2018) and was thereby funded by ZonMw (grant 549007001). This project also received support from the COMBACTE MAGNET EPI-Net project funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking under grant agreement 115523 | 115620 | 115737 | 777362, resources of which are composed of financial contribution from the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies in kind contribution. J.K.V. was supported by grants from Region Stockholm and Vinnova.

Objectives/Purpose The costs attributable to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remain theoretical and largely unspecified. Current figures fail to capture the full health and economic burden caused by AMR across human, animal, and environmental health; historically many studies have considered only direct costs associated with human infection from a hospital perspective, primarily from high-income countries. The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Platform for ONE-Burden Estimates (GAP-ON€) network has developed a framework to help guide AMR costing exercises in any part of the world as a first step towards more comprehensive analyses for comparing AMR interventions at the local level as well as more harmonized analyses for quantifying the full economic burden attributable to AMR at the global level.Methods GAP-ON€ (funded under the JPIAMR 8th call (Virtual Research Institute) is composed of 19 international networks and institutions active in the field of AMR. For this project, the Network operated by means of Delphi rounds, teleconferences and face-to-face meetings. The resulting costing framework takes a bottom-up approach to incorporate all relevant costs imposed by an AMR bacterial microbe in a patient, in an animal, or in the environment up through to the societal level. Results The framework itemizes the epidemiological data as well as the direct and indirect cost components needed to build a realistic cost picture for AMR. While the framework lists a large number of relevant pathogens for which this framework could be used to explore the costs, the framework is sufficiently generic to facilitate the costing of other resistant pathogens, including those of other aetiologies. Conclusion In order to conduct cost-effectiveness analyses to choose amongst different AMR-related interventions at local level, the costing of AMR should be done according to local epidemiological priorities and local health service norms. Yet the use of a common framework across settings allows for the results of such studies to contribute to cumulative estimates that can serve as the basis of broader policy decisions at the international level such as how to steer R&D funding and how to prioritize AMR amongst other issues. Indeed, it is only by building a realistic cost picture that we can make informed decisions on how best to tackle major health threats.

Objective There is poor evidence to determine the superiority of combination regimens versus monotherapy against infections due to carbapenem-resistant (CR) Gram-negative bacteria. In vivo models can simulate the pathophysiology of infections in humans and assess antibiotic efficacy. We aim to investigate in vivo effects of antibiotic combination on mortality and disease burden for infections due to CR Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae and provide an unbiased overview of existing knowledge. The results of the study can help prioritising future research on the most promising therapies against CR bacteria. Methods and analysis This protocol was formulated using the Systematic Review Protocol for Animal Intervention Studies (SYRCLE) Checklist. Publications will be collected from PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. Quality checklists adapted by Collaborative Approach to Meta-Analysis and Review of Animal Data from Experimental Studies and SYRCLE’s risk of bias tool will be used. If the meta-analysis seems feasible, the ES and the 95% CI will be analysed. The heterogeneity between studies will be assessed by I2 test. Subgroup meta-analysis will be performed when possible to assess the impact of the studies on efficacy of the treatments. Funnel plotting will be used to evaluate the risk of publication bias. Dissemination This systematic review and meta-analysis is part of a wider research collaboration project, the COmbination tHErapy to treat sepsis due to carbapenem-Resistant bacteria in adult and paediatric population: EvideNCE and common practice (COHERENCE) study that includes also the analyses of in vitro and human studies. Data will be presented at international conferences and the results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO registration number CRD42019128104(available at: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42019128104).

Objectives/PurposeThe costs attributable to antimicrobial resistance (AMR) across human, animal, and environmental health remain theoretical and largely unspecified. Current figures fail to capture the full health and economic burden caused by AMR; historically many studies have considered only direct costs associated with human infection from a hospital perspective, primarily from high-income countries. The Global Antimicrobial Resistance Platform for ONE-Burden Estimates (GAP-ON€) network aimed to develop a global, One Health AMR Cost Framework, that can be used by countries, regions, and other entities to quantify the economic burden attributable to AMR.MethodsGAP-ON€ (funded under the JPIAMR 8th call (Virtual Research Institute) is composed of 19 international networks and institutions active in the field of AMR. It operated by means of Delphi rounds, teleconferences (TCs) and face-to-face (F2F) meetings. It assumes a bottom-up cost estimate, at the National level, with a global scope across all One Health Areas.ResultsThe resulting framework consists of the epidemiological data and the direct and indirect cost components, linked by the likelihood of each AMR-related health state that imposes such costs, across all One Health Areas for a large number of relevant pathogens. It represents a first step towards more comprehensive analyses for comparing cost-effectiveness of AMR interventions at the local level as well as more harmonised analyses at the global level.ConclusionThis is the first full AMR costing framework to be developed for bacterial pathogens in human and animal health and the environment. It aims to provide guidance on the data items necessary to calculate AMR costs in a global, One Health perspective to facilitate harmonized, full economic analyses. It is only through building a realistic cost picture that we can make informed decisions about potential strategies and political priorities.

Purpose of review Combination therapy is a common strategy for treatment of multidrug resistant infections. Despite the strong twin rationales of improving efficacy and reducing resistance development, the evidence supporting this strategy remains controversial. The aims of this review are to assess the most recent studies supporting the use of combination therapy for treating infections because of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and to highlight relevant areas for further research. Recent findings Evidence supporting the use of combination therapy for the treatment of CRE remains limited to in-vitro experiments and observational studies with considerable risk of bias. Very few antibiotic combinations have been tested in well designed randomized controlled trials, making it difficult to draw general conclusions for clinical practice. Summary Further studies are urgently needed to test the most promising synergistic combinations. New drugs potentially active against CRE should also to be tested in studies with adequate sample size and truly representative of the general patient population.

This systematic review assessed study-level determinants of non-covering (inappropriate) empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT), focusing on the influence of study years and the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in the study. Prospective and retrospective observational studies reporting on the association between IEAT and mortality in adult patients with microbiologically documented infections published between 2008–2016 were included. A meta-analysis of IEAT rates was conducted using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses and mixed-effect single-covariate meta-regression were conducted to identify the association between clinical and methodological study-level covariates and IEAT rates. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I 2 measure of inconsistency. Multi-covariate meta-regression was conducted including variables with a P -value of I 2 = 97.7%). On multi-covariate analyses, the prevalence of any MDRO [odds ratio (OR) per 10% increase in prevalence = 1.11, 95% CI 1.07–1.15], Acinetobacter spp. specifically (OR = 1.99, 95% CI 1.22–3.25) and advancing study years were associated with IEAT rates (OR = 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.06 per year). MDRO rates were independently associated with mortality rates in the studies, adjusting to the rate of IEAT. The prevalence of MDROs, mainly multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, is significantly associated with the probability of prescribing IEAT and mortality rates in recent studies. We show how antibiotic resistance impacts patient management and outcomes.

Summary Background Antibiotic stewardship programmes have been shown to reduce antibiotic use and hospital costs. We aimed to evaluate evidence of the effect of antibiotic stewardship on the incidence of infections and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Methods For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science for studies published from Jan 1, 1960, to May 31, 2016, that analysed the effect of antibiotic stewardship programmes on the incidence of infection and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and Clostridium difficile infections in hospital inpatients. Two authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials and extracted data. Studies involving long-term care facilities were excluded. The main outcomes were incidence ratios (IRs) of target infections and colonisation per 1000 patient-days before and after implementation of antibiotic stewardship. Meta-analyses were done with random-effect models and heterogeneity was calculated with the I 2 method. Findings We included 32 studies in the meta-analysis, comprising 9 056 241 patient-days and 159 estimates of IRs. Antibiotic stewardship programmes reduced the incidence of infections and colonisation with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (51% reduction; IR 0·49, 95% CI 0·35–0·68; p Staphylococcus aureus (37%; 0·63, 0·45–0·88; p=0·0065), as well as the incidence of C difficile infections (32%; 0·68, 0·53–0·88; p=0·0029). Antibiotic stewardship programmes were more effective when implemented with infection control measures (IR 0·69, 0·54–0·88; p=0·0030), especially hand-hygiene interventions (0·34, 0·21–0·54; p Interpretation Antibiotic stewardship programmes significantly reduce the incidence of infections and colonisation with antibiotic-resistant bacteria and C difficile infections in hospital inpatients. These results provide stakeholders and policy makers with evidence for implementation of antibiotic stewardship interventions to reduce the burden of infections from antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Funding German Center for Infection Research.

There is increasing evidence that psycho-social factors can influence antimicrobial prescribing practice in hospitals and the community, and represent potential barriers to antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Clinicians are conditioned both by emotional and cognitive factors based on fear, uncertainty, a set of beliefs, risk perception and cognitive bias, and by interpersonal factors established through social norms and peer and doctor–patient communication. However, a gap is emerging between research and practice, and no stewardship recommendation addresses the most appropriate human resource allocation or modalities to account for psycho-social determinants of prescribing. There is a need for translation of the evidence available from human behaviour studies to the design and implementation of stewardship interventions and policies at hospital and community levels. The integration of behaviour experts into multidisciplinary stewardship teams seems essential to positively impact on prescribers’ communication and decision-making competencies, and reduce inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to measure the impact of antibiotic exposure on the acquisition of colonization with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria (ESBL-GNB) accounting for individual- and group-level confounding using machine-learning methods. Methods: Patients hospitalized between September 2010 and June 2013 at six medical and six surgical wards in Italy, Serbia and Romania were screened for ESBL-GNB at hospital admission, discharge, antibiotic start, and after 3, 7, 15 and 30 days. Primary outcomes were the incidence rate and predictive factors of new ESBL-GNB colonization. Random forest algorithm was used to rank antibiotics according to the risk of selection of ESBL-GNB colonization in patients not colonized before starting antibiotics. Results: We screened 10 034 patients collecting 28 322 rectal swab samples. New ESBL-GNB colonization incidence with and without antibiotic treatment was 22/1000 and 9/1000 exposure-days, respectively. In the adjusted regression analyses, antibiotic exposure (hazard ratio (HR) 2.38; 95% CI 1.29-4.40), age 60-69 years (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.05-1.34), and spring season (HR 1.25; 95% CI 1.14-1.38) were independently associated with new colonization. Monotherapy ranked higher als combination therapy in promoting ESBL-GNB colonization. Among monotherapy, cephalosporins ranked first followed by tetracycline (second), macrolide (fourth) and cotrimoxazole (seventh). Overall the ranking of cephalosporins was lower when used in combination. Among combinations not including cephalosporins, quinolones plus carbapenems ranked highest (eighth). Among sequential therapies, quinolones ranked highest (tenth) when prescribed within 30 days of therapy with cephalosporins. Conclusions: Impact of antibiotics on selecting ESBL-GNB at intestinal level varies if used in monotherapy or combination and according to previous antibiotic exposure. These finding should be explored in future clinical trials on antibiotic stewardship interventions. (c) 2019 European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Background People with cancer with febrile neutropenia are at risk of severe infections and mortality and are thus treated empirically with broad-spectrum antibiotic therapy. However, the recommended duration of antibiotic therapy differs across guidelines. Objectives To assess the safety of protocol-guided discontinuation of antibiotics regardless of neutrophil count, compared to continuation of antibiotics until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer with fever and neutropenia, in terms of mortality and morbidity. To assess the emergence of resistant bacteria in people with cancer treated with short courses of antibiotic therapy compared with people with cancer treated until resolution of neutropenia. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2018, Issue 10) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS up to 1 October 2018. We searched the metaRegister of Controlled Trials and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register ClinicalTrials.gov for ongoing and unpublished trials. We reviewed the references of all identified studies for additional trials and handsearched conference proceedings of international infectious diseases and oncology and haematology conferences. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared a short antibiotic therapy course in which discontinuation of antibiotics was guided by protocols regardless of the neutrophil count to a long course in which antibiotics were continued until neutropenia resolution in people with cancer with febrile neutropenia. The primary outcome was 30-day or end of follow-up all-cause mortality. Data collection and analysis Two review authors independently reviewed all studies for eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias for all included trials. We calculated risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) whenever possible. For dichotomous outcomes with zero events in both arms of the trials, we conducted meta-analysis of risk differences (RDs) as well. For continuous outcomes, we extracted means with standard deviations (SD) from the studies and computed mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. If no substantial clinical heterogeneity was found, trials were pooled using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model. Main results We included eight RCTs comprising a total of 662 distinct febrile neutropenia episodes. The studies included adults and children, and had variable design and criteria for discontinuation of antibiotics in both study arms. All included studies but two were performed before the year 2000. All studies included people with cancer with fever of unknown origin and excluded people with microbiological documented infections.We found no significant difference between the short-antibiotic therapy arm and the long-antibiotic therapy arm for all-cause mortality (RR 1.38, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.62; RD 0.02, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.05; low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence to low due to imprecision and high risk of selection bias. The number of fever days was significantly lower for people in the short-antibiotic treatment arm compared to the long-antibiotic treatment arm (mean difference -0.64, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.32; I² = 30%). In all studies, total antibiotic days were fewer in the intervention arm by three to seven days compared to the long antibiotic therapy. We found no significant differences in the rates of clinical failure (RR 1.23, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.77; very low-certainty evidence). We downgraded the certainty of the evidence for clinical failure due to variable and inconsistent definitions of clinical failure across studies, possible selection bias, and wide confidence intervals. There was no significant difference in the incidence of bacteraemia occurring after randomisation (RR 1.56, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.66; very low-certainty evidence), while the incidence of any documented infections was significantly higher in the short-antibiotic therapy arm (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.57). There was no significant difference in the incidence of invasive fungal infections (RR 0.86, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.31) and development of antibiotic resistance (RR 1.49, 95% CI 0.62 to 3.61). The data on hospital stay were too sparse to permit any meaningful conclusions. Authors' conclusions We could make no strong conclusions on the safety of antibiotic discontinuation before neutropenia resolution among people with cancer with febrile neutropenia based on the existing evidence and its low certainty. Results of microbiological outcomes favouring long antibiotic therapy may be misleading due to lower culture positivity rates under antibiotic therapy and not true differences in infection rates. Well-designed, adequately powered RCTs are required that address this issue in the era of rising antibiotic resistance.

Electrodeposited cobalt nickel phosphorus alloys are characterized by interesting magnetic properties, which motivate their potential applicability in micro-electromagnetic devices like sensors and actuators. CoNiP is suitable for MEMS fabrication due to its relatively high coercivity and maximum magnetic energy product. Moreover, the columnar grain structure typical of electrodeposited layers introduces a high magnetic anisotropy, which is desirable for devices that require high magnetic flux and energy product along a specific direction [1]. In addition to their magnetic properties, CoNiP alloys are also characterized by high hardness, which makes them good candidates for the production of anti-wear coatings, and by good corrosion resistance. Finally, CoNiP coatings show a notable catalytic activity, which can be exploited in water splitting applications [2]. One of the most remarkable advantages of using electrodeposition for CoNiP production is the possibility to easily tune magnetic properties by varying deposition parameters. Physical and chemical parameters like bath composition, temperature, pH, presence of additives have a great role on final properties determination [3]. Magnetic behavior can be soft or semi-hard according to the conditions employed. Magnetic properties, however, depend not only on the chemistry of the electrolyte and the primary plating parameters, but also on other secondary deposition aspects. These include, for example, the substrate on which the alloy is plated [4] and its roughness [5]. Furthermore, the application of an external magnetic field during the deposition can influence final properties of the deposited layer. Finally, also the presence of inert particles codeposited within the CoNiP layer can change the magnetic behavior of the coatings. In this context, CoNiP has been poorly characterized in the existing literature. The aim of the present work is to explore the influence of some secondary deposition parameters on CoNiP magnetic properties. In detail, a CoNiP electrolyte was selected and its chemical composition was kept constant during the experimentation. The same was done with the deposition parameters. CoNiP was deposited on different substrates, characterized by different materials (brass, copper, silver) and by different degrees of roughness. The alloy was also codeposited with inert (TiO2) nanoparticles and in presence of an external magnetic field. The influence of these variables on final magnetic properties was investigated with vibrating sample magnetometry (VSM). Surface morphology and phase composition were characterized by mean of SEM and XRD. CoNiP layers were also annealed, and the effect of the heat treatment on magnetic properties was studied. Finally, the observed substrate sensitivity of CoNiP magnetic properties was exploited to introduce a surface magnetic anisotropy in electrodeposited CoNiP layers. Brass substrates were patterned with electrodeposited copper and CoNiP was deposited on top. Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) was employed to characterize the result, evidencing differences in magnetic properties between the zones where CoNiP was plated on brass and the zones where CoNiP was plated on electrodeposited copper. The final result was a magnetically patterned CoNiP coating, which may potentially find application in microelectronics and sensors production. [1] C. J. Hsiao et al., AIP Advances 7, 056210 (2017) [2] A. Han et al., J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 10195 (2016) [3] P. Cojocaru et al., Trans. Inst. Met. Fin. 89(4), 194 (2011) [4] E. I. Manimaran et al., J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 26, 9821 (2015) [5] S. J. Steinmuller et al., J. Appl. Phys. 101, 09D113 (2007)

Summary Background The spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a substantial threat to morbidity and mortality worldwide. Due to its large public health and societal implications, multidrug-resistant tuberculosis has been long regarded by WHO as a global priority for investment in new drugs. In 2016, WHO was requested by member states to create a priority list of other antibiotic-resistant bacteria to support research and development of effective drugs. Methods We used a multicriteria decision analysis method to prioritise antibiotic-resistant bacteria; this method involved the identification of relevant criteria to assess priority against which each antibiotic-resistant bacterium was rated. The final priority ranking of the antibiotic-resistant bacteria was established after a preference-based survey was used to obtain expert weighting of criteria. Findings We selected 20 bacterial species with 25 patterns of acquired resistance and ten criteria to assess priority: mortality, health-care burden, community burden, prevalence of resistance, 10-year trend of resistance, transmissibility, preventability in the community setting, preventability in the health-care setting, treatability, and pipeline. We stratified the priority list into three tiers (critical, high, and medium priority), using the 33rd percentile of the bacterium's total scores as the cutoff. Critical-priority bacteria included carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and carbapenem-resistant and third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. The highest ranked Gram-positive bacteria (high priority) were vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium and meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus . Of the bacteria typically responsible for community-acquired infections, clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori , and fluoroquinolone-resistant Campylobacter spp, Neisseria gonorrhoeae , and Salmonella typhi were included in the high-priority tier. Interpretation Future development strategies should focus on antibiotics that are active against multidrug-resistant tuberculosis and Gram-negative bacteria. The global strategy should include antibiotic-resistant bacteria responsible for community-acquired infections such as Salmonella spp, Campylobacter spp, N gonorrhoeae , and H pylori . Funding World Health Organization.

EPI-Net, Combacte-Magnet and EUCIC Group for SUSPIRE: F. Burkert, E. Carrara, M. von Cube, L. Drgona, K. Gilchrist, H. Goossens, S. Harbarth, D. Hequet, H. Jafri, G. Kahlmeter, S. Kuster, C. Luxemburger, M. McCarthy, M. Niks, A. Oualim, M. Poljak, O. Sandulescu, A. Schweiger, C. Vuong, I. Wiegand, A. Widmer, A. T. Witschi, G. Zanetti, W. Zingg., [Objectives] Surveillance is a key component of any control strategy for healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and public availability of methodologic aspects is crucial for the interpretation of the data. We sought to systematically review publicly available information for HAIs and/or AMR surveillance systems organized by public institutions or scientific societies in European countries., [Methods] A systematic review of scientific and grey literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines was performed. Information on HAIs and/or AMR surveillance systems published until 31 October 2016 were included., [Results] A total of 112 surveillance systems were detected; 56 from 20 countries were finally included. Most exclusions were due to lack of publicly available information. Regarding AMR, the most frequent indicator was the proportion of resistant isolates (27 of 34 providing information, 79.42%); only 18 (52.9%) included incidence rates; the data were only laboratory based in 33 (78.5%) of the 42 providing this information. Regarding HAIs in intensive care units, all 22 of the systems providing data included central line–associated bloodstream infections, and 19 (86.3%) included ventilator-associated pneumonia and catheter-associated urinary tract infections; incidence density was the most frequent indicator. Regarding surgical site infections, the most frequent procedures included were hip prosthesis, colon surgery and caesarean section (21/22, 95.5%)., [Conclusions] Publicly available information about the methods and indicators of the surveillance system is frequently lacking. Despite the efforts of European Centre for Disease Control and Prevention (ECDC) and other organizations, wide heterogeneity in procedures and indicators still exists., Funded by the Innovative Medicines Initiative (IMI), New Drugs for Bad Bugs (ND4BB) programme, European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA (European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Association) companies' in-kind contribution (IMI 11th) under grant 115737, COMBACTE-MAGNET (Combatting bacterial resistance in Europe—Molecule against Gram negative infections). JRB and MDT receive funding for research from Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, cofinanced by European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) ‘A way to achieve Europe,’ Spanish Network for the Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD12/0015 and REIPI RD16/0016).

Background Pneumonia is a common and potentially serious illness. Corticosteroids have been suggested for the treatment of different types of infection, however their role in the treatment of pneumonia remains unclear. This is an update of a review published in 2011. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of corticosteroids in the treatment of pneumonia. Search methods We searched the Cochrane Acute Respiratory Infections Group's Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and LILACS on 3 March 2017, together with relevant conference proceedings and references of identified trials. We also searched three trials registers for ongoing and unpublished trials. Selection criteria We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed systemic corticosteroid therapy, given as adjunct to antibiotic treatment, versus placebo or no corticosteroids for adults and children with pneumonia. Data collection and analysis We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted data. We contacted study authors for additional information. We estimated risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and pooled data using the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect model when possible. Main results We included 17 RCTs comprising a total of 2264 participants; 13 RCTs included 1954 adult participants, and four RCTs included 310 children. This update included 12 new studies, excluded one previously included study, and excluded five new trials. One trial awaits classification.All trials limited inclusion to inpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), with or without healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). We assessed the risk of selection bias and attrition bias as low or unclear overall. We assessed performance bias risk as low for nine trials, unclear for one trial, and high for seven trials. We assessed reporting bias risk as low for three trials and high for the remaining 14 trials.Corticosteroids significantly reduced mortality in adults with severe pneumonia (RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.84; moderate-quality evidence), but not in adults with non-severe pneumonia (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.00). Early clinical failure rates (defined as death from any cause, radiographic progression, or clinical instability at day 5 to 8) were significantly reduced with corticosteroids in people with severe and non-severe pneumonia (RR 0.32, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.7; and RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.83, respectively; high-quality evidence). Corstocosteroids reduced time to clinical cure, length of hospital and intensive care unit stays, development of respiratory failure or shock not present at pneumonia onset, and rates of pneumonia complications.Among children with bacterial pneumonia, corticosteroids reduced early clinical failure rates (defined as for adults, RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.70; high-quality evidence) based on two small, clinically heterogeneous trials, and reduced time to clinical cure.Hyperglycaemia was significantly more common in adults treated with corticosteroids (RR 1.72, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.14). There were no significant differences between corticosteroid-treated people and controls for other adverse events or secondary infections (RR 1.19, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.93). Authors' conclusions Corticosteroid therapy reduced mortality and morbidity in adults with severe CAP; the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome was 18 patients (95% CI 12 to 49) to prevent one death. Corticosteroid therapy reduced morbidity, but not mortality, for adults and children with non-severe CAP. Corticosteroid therapy was associated with more adverse events, especially hyperglycaemia, but the harms did not seem to outweigh the benefits.

3D printing is currently finding an increasing number of applications in many different fields. This technique, relegated for years to high-end rapid prototyping due to its high costs, is now acquiring industrial relevance for the direct fabrication of objects. The well-known advantages of scalability, production rate and the possibility to produce shapes otherwise impossible to manufacture with conventional techniques are at the base of the exponential market growth of additive manufacturing technologies. Such advantages apply not only to the production of macroscopic structures, a practice already well implemented in the current practice, but also to the manufacturing of microscopic objects. 3D printing of functional devices in the millimetric and sub-millimetric dimensional range can be challenging due to the high resolution needed, in the order of tens of micrometers. This result is possible using only some of the technologies available: stereolithography (SLA), two photons lithography (2PL) or selective laser sintering (SLS). However, all these techniques are characterized by the same drawback: the difficulty to work with metals. Metallic parts are used when the functional structures produced must interact with magnetic fields or must be electrically/thermally conductive. Only selective laser sintering (SLS) is able to work on metallic parts with sufficient precision, but typically the objects does not have the same properties of a bulk counterpart, either forged or machined. A possible solution to get metallic properties on 3d printed objects is to impart them only to the surface via external metallization. Particularly advantageous from this point of view are the wet metallization techniques, thanks to their low cost and high productivity rates. The handling of very small parts is however difficult and, for this reason, suitable approaches must be developed. An approach to the plating of millimetric objects have already been investigated [1]. In that case, Cu and a CoNiP alloy were applied to freestanding 3D printed microdevices using a fully electroless process. The approach presented is characterized however by significant drawbacks, the first one being that only electroless alloys can be deposited. As an example, high performances hard magnetic alloys like CoPt are impossible to deposit. A second disadvantage is connected to the plating rate: electroless deposition must be carried out at low temperatures due to the physical characteristics of the 3D printing resins, and this strongly limits plating rate. Another possible approach to apply a metallic layer on a 3D printed microstructure is the application of an hybrid electroless/electrolytic metallization route. A first layer of a metal is electroless applied, according to previous literature [2], to make the surface of the resin conductive. Once a first layer of metal covers the surface, electrolytic deposition can be used to deposit the functional coating. This technique is described in the present work, where two methods are used to contact the object with the current generator. The first one is the exploitation of the 3D printing supports, generally used during the 3D printing steps, as electrical contacts. The second one is the use of a modified version of barrel plating. Functionality and performances of the two approaches are studied on prototypical microdevices printed via SLS. Finally, an applicative example is presented. The method described can find application in many sectors, including the production of magnetically controlled micromanipulators [3] or the additive manufacturing of MEMS. [1] ECS Meeting Abstract MA2016-01 1105 [2] R. Bernasconi, C. Credi, G. Natale, M. Tironi, F. Cuneo, M. Levi and L. Magagnin; ECS Trans. 72, issue 21 (2016) 9-21 [3] S. Kim, F. Qiu, S. Kim, A. Ghanbari, C. Moon, L. Zhang, B. J. Nelson and H. Choi; Adv. Mater.25 (2013) 5863-5868