Search

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma, the most common primary brain tumor in adults, is usually rapidly fatal. The current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma is surgical resection to the extent feasible, followed by adjuvant radiotherapy. In this trial we compared radiotherapy alone with radiotherapy plus temozolomide, given concomitantly with and after radiotherapy, in terms of efficacy and safety. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed, histologically confirmed glioblastoma were randomly assigned to receive radiotherapy alone (fractionated focal irradiation in daily fractions of 2 Gy given 5 days per week for 6 weeks, for a total of 60 Gy) or radiotherapy plus continuous daily temozolomide (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area per day, 7 days per week from the first to the last day of radiotherapy), followed by six cycles of adjuvant temozolomide (150 to 200 mg per square meter for 5 days during each 28-day cycle). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: A total of 573 patients from 85 centers underwent randomization. The median age was 56 years, and 84 percent of patients had undergone debulking surgery. At a median follow-up of 28 months, the median survival was 14.6 months with radiotherapy plus temozolomide and 12.1 months with radiotherapy alone. The unadjusted hazard ratio for death in the radiotherapy-plus-temozolomide group was 0.63 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.52 to 0.75; P

We performed a phase I trial of CI-937 (DUP937), an anthrapyrazole, with the following objectives: (a) to determine the maximally tolerated dose in humans; (b) to define the toxicity spectrum of this agent; (c) to describe the pharmacokinetics of the drug; (d) to test a pharmacokinetics based hypothesis of dose escalation; and (e) to relate drug pharmacokinetics to pharmacodynamics. CI-937 was administered as a single bolus injection every 3-4 weeks at doses ranging from 3.6 to 25.2 mg/m2. Thirty-two patients and 57 courses were evaluable for toxicity. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 30 patients on the first course using a sensitive and selective radioimmunoassay. The maximally tolerated dose in patients with no prior therapy was 25.2 mg/m2 and dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting, stomatitis, and alopecia were mild. A partial response was recorded in a patient with mesothelioma. The area under the curve increased linearly with dose, and total body clearance of CI-937 was independent of dose. The mean total body clearance was 107 +/- 55.8 ml/min/m2, mean steady state volume of distribution was 492 +/- 469 liters/m2, and terminal half-life was 3.78 +/- 2.86 days. The extended factors of 2 methods of pharmacologically guided dose escalation were intended for use but ultimately were equivalent to that of the modified Fibonacci dose escalation method. Dose and the area under the curve were significant predictors of a percentage change in WBC and neutrophil count in a univariate analysis. Only dose and baseline neutrophil count predicted a percentage change in WBCs in a multifactor analysis. Dose and prior chemotherapy predicted percentage change in neutrophil count in a multifactor analysis. We conclude that the dose-limiting toxicity of CI-937 is neutropenia and that the recommended phase II starting dose is 22 mg/m2.

Objective: To review the current status of large phase academic clinical trials for women with ovarian cancer, address cross-cutting issues, and identify promising areas for future collaboration. Methods: In May 2009, the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup, which represents 19 Cooperative Groups conducting trials for women with gynecologic cancer, and the US National Cancer Institute convened a Clinical Trials Planning Meeting. Results: The topics covered included the impact of new developments in cancer biology upon molecular targets and novel agents, pharmacogenomics, advances in imaging, the potential benefit of diet and exercise to reduce the risk of recurrence, academic partnership with industry, statistical considerations for phases 2 and 3 trials, trial end points, and symptom benefit and health-related quality-of-life issues. The clinical trials discussed spanned the spectrum of ovarian cancer from initial diagnosis, staging, and cytoreductive surgery to consolidation chemotherapy, and treatment of recurrent disease. Conclusions: Ongoing and effective collaboration with industry, government, and patients aims to ensure that the most important scientific questions can be answered rapidly. We encourage women with ovarian cancer and their oncologists to consider participation in the academic clinical trials conducted by the member groups of the Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup.

PURPOSE Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, Wallingford, CT) is a new anticancer agent with activity in a number of human tumors, including epithelial ovarian cancer. In nonrandomized trials, doses studied have ranged from 135 mg/m2 to 250 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours with premedication to avoid hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). This study addressed two questions: the dose-response relationship of Taxol in relapsed ovarian cancer and the safety of a short infusion given with premedication. METHODS Women with platinum-pretreated epithelial ovarian cancer and measurable recurrent disease were randomized in a bifactorial design to receive either 175 or 135 mg/m2 of Taxol over either 24 or 3 hours. Major end points were the frequency of significant HSRs and objective response rate. Secondary end points were progression-free and overall survival. RESULTS Of 407 patients randomized, 391 were eligible and 382 assessable for response. Analysis was performed according to the bifactorial design. Severe HSRs were rare (1.5% patients) and were not affected by either dose or schedule. Response was slightly higher at the 175-mg/m2 dose (20%) than at 135 mg/m2 (15%), but this was not statistically significant (P = .2). However, progression-free survival was significantly longer in the high-dose group (19 v 14 weeks; P = .02). Significantly more neutropenia was seen when Taxol was administered as a 24-hour infusion. Response rates were similar in the 24- and 3-hour groups (19% and 16%, respectively; P = .6). No survival differences were noted. CONCLUSION The 3-hour infusion of Taxol is safe when given with premedication and is associated with less neutropenia. There is a modest dose effect with longer time to progression at 175 mg/m2. The observation that longer infusion produces more myelosuppression but does not yield higher response rates should lead to further studies to determine the optimal dose and schedule of this interesting new agent.