Search

Novel therapies improve clinical outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), although adverse event (AE) profiles differ. This study evaluated time and personnel costs of AE management among healthcare professionals (HCPs) treating patients with CLL with novel therapies. A non-interventional prospective survey was conducted over 2 months. Eligible HCPs reported the time per day spent performing AE management activities for CLL patients treated with acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, or venetoclax. Mean time and personnel costs (USD) per activity were summarized and used to estimate the total annual costs of AE management for an average-sized oncology practice. For an average-sized practice (28 HCPs with an average of 56 CLL patients), the mean annual personnel cost of AE management for CLL patients on novel agents was estimated at $115,733. The personnel cost associated with acalabrutinib ($20,912) was less than half that of ibrutinib ($53,801) and venetoclax ($41,884), potentially due to fewer severe AEs and less time spent by oncologists managing AEs compared to other HCP types. The substantial burden of AE management for patients with CLL may vary by treatment used. Acalabrutinib was associated with lower annual costs of AE management at an oncology practice level compared to ibrutinib and venetoclax.

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-tar-10.1177_17534666221116997 for Impact of adherence to treatment with inhaled corticosteroids/long-acting β-agonists on asthma outcomes in the United States by Carlyne M. Averell, François Laliberté, Guillaume Germain, Mei Sheng Duh, Matthew D. Rousculp, Sean D. MacKnight and David J. Slade in Therapeutic Advances in Respiratory Disease

Additional file 5. Risk of AEs and SAEs with free combination therapy compared with dutasteride or tamsulosin monotherapy*, by patient age group.

Additional file 4. Frequency and duration of treatment with free combination therapy, dutasteride monotherapy, or tamsulosin monotherapy among patients with prevalent BPH in South Korea by age group.

Additional file 1. Supplementary Table 1 Supplemental table showing the ICD-9/10-CM diagnostic codes for COPD, COPD-related exacerbations and asthma. Supplementary Fig. 1 Supplemental figure showing the Kaplan–Meier rates of (A) moderate and (B) severe exacerbations for the UMEC and TIO cohorts.

Additional file 3. Identification of treatment cohorts for eligible patients with BPH from the South Korean HIRA-NPS database.

Additional file 2. Adverse events from the Global Datasheet for dutasteride-tamsulosin hydrochloride.

Additional file 1. Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Sample (HIRA-NPS) claims database.

Additional file 1 Appendix Table 1. Patient Characteristics in Metastatic and Triple Negative Patients/Metastatic and HER2(−) Patients Appendix Table 2. Proportion of Patients Tested for BRCA Pathogenic Variants by Physician Characteristics Appendix Table 3. Proportion Tested for BRCA Pathogenic Variants in Accordance with NCCN Guidelines by Year of Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

BackgroundUsing data from four tertiary referral centers in the U.S., we assessed real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with advanced lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).Subjects, materials, and methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of adult patients with locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung NETs treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was histologically confirmed typical/atypical carcinoid tumor diagnosis date. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and lung NET-related health care resource use from index date through last contact/death. Time to treatment discontinuation and first progression, time from first to second progression, and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsWe identified 83 patients; 19 (23%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analogs (SSAs) alone (56%) or in combination with other therapies (6%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (20%), external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) (9%), liver-directed therapy (LDT) (4%), and everolimus/other (5%). Sixty patients had second-line therapy including SSA alone (18%) or in combination (40%), cytotoxic chemotherapy (17%), everolimus (12%), LDT (7%), EBRT (3%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation were as follows: SSAs, 43.3; cytotoxic chemotherapy, 3.6. Overall median time (months) to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 12.4. Median OS (months) following treatment initiation was 66.4 for all patients and 81.5 for patients receiving SSAs.ConclusionSSAs, alone and in combination, are common treatments for advanced lung NETs. Patients have additional treatment options and relatively long survival compared with patients with other advanced cancers. Treatment pattern assessment following approval of newer treatments is needed.Implications for practiceSomatostatin analogs (SSAs), cytotoxic chemotherapy, EBRT, liver-directed therapy, and targeted therapies are common treatments for locally advanced/metastatic (typical/atypical) lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). SSAs alone or in combination with other treatment modalities were the most common first- and second-line therapy, followed by cytotoxic chemotherapy. Patients continued treatment with SSAs long-term with median treatment duration of 43 months. Median overall survival was 66 months following initiation of first-line therapy for all patients. Treatment pattern assessment beyond the time period of this study is needed given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for lung NETs that will likely be incorporated in the treatment landscape.

BackgroundWe assessed treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) at four large tertiary referral centers in the U.S.Patients and methodsWe performed a retrospective chart review of patients aged ≥18 years at advanced GI NET diagnosis, treated between July 2011 and December 2014. Index date was the histologically confirmed diagnosis date of locally advanced/metastatic GI NET. Data included baseline characteristics, treatment patterns, progression, death, and GI NET-related health care resource utilization from index date through last contact or death. Time-to-event analyses, including treatment discontinuation, progression, and overall survival (OS), were performed using Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsWe identified 273 patients; 156 (57%) had primary ileum NET, and 174 (64%) had functional NET. First-line treatments included somatostatin analog (SSA) alone (89%) or in combination (2%), liver-directed therapy (LDT; 8%), and cytotoxic chemotherapy or interferon (2%). One hundred fifty-five patients continued with second-line therapy, including SSA alone (17%) or in combination (75%, with 3% combined with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy), LDT (4%), and other treatments (3%). Median time (months) to first-line discontinuation was 154.0 for SSAs and 3.8 for cytotoxic chemotherapy. Overall median time to investigator-assessed progression following treatment initiation was 30.3 months. Median OS (months) following first-line initiation was 151.8 for all patients and 178.9 for first-line SSA.ConclusionOur study illustrates the common use of SSAs in both first-line and subsequent treatment of patients with GI NETs, as well as the relatively long survival durations and multiple additional treatments received by patients with this condition. Treatment pattern assessment at later times, following approval of newer treatments, is warranted.Implications for practiceThis study, assessing treatment patterns over a period of up to 30 years, showed that SSAs, LDT, cytotoxic chemotherapy, and interferon are common treatments for advanced GI NETs. SSAs alone or in combination with other treatments were the most frequent therapy in first and subsequent lines. Patients in this study remained on SSAs long-term, with median treatment duration of 12.8 years in first line. Treatment patterns should be assessed beyond this study's time period, given recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration approvals for additional treatments for GI NET, which will likely be incorporated in the continuum of care of patients.

Background: The objective of this study was to identify important attributes associated with the triad of symptoms (cognition, emotional–behavioral, and motor) of Huntington's disease (HD) from patient, caregiver, and medical provider perspectives to facilitate development of a new disease‐specific, health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) instrument. Methods: We conducted a targeted literature review of HD and HRQOL instruments, expert surveys, and patient and caregiver phone‐based interviews to extract information on the symptoms and issues most relevant to the HD symptom triad (HD triad). The data collected from these sources were used to generate themes and subdomains and to develop an integrated schema that highlights the key dimensions of the triad. Results: The search identified the following areas: emotional functioning/behavioral changes (e.g., positive emotions, sadness/depression); cognitive functioning (e.g., memory/learning, attention/comprehension); physical functioning (e.g., motor functioning, medication); social functioning (e.g., leisure, interpersonal relationships); end‐of‐life concerns/planning; and gene testing. Fifteen individuals diagnosed with HD and 16 HD caregivers, recruited from several Huntington's Disease Society of America support group networks, completed phone interviews. Nineteen US medical providers who specialize in HD completed the online survey. Twenty‐six subdomains of the HD symptom triad (seven cognition, 12 emotional–behavioral, and seven motor) emerged relatively consistently across patient, caregiver, and provider samples. These included movements/chorea, memory impairment, depression, and anxiety. Discussion: Based on an integrated, mixed‐methods approach, important HD triad symptom were identified and organized into a guiding schema. These patient‐, caregiver‐, and provider‐triangulated data served as the basis for development of a HD‐specific HRQOL instrument, the HD‐PRO‐TRIAD™., Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements, Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements

BACKGROUND Effective treatment options for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) or Philadelphia‐positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who have the threonine to isoleucine mutation at codon 315 (T315I) are few. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) between patients with CML and those with Ph+ ALL who received treatment with ponatinib versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo‐SCT). METHODS A post hoc, retrospective, indirect comparison of OS among patients who received single‐agent ponatinib in the Ponatinib Ph+ ALL and CML Evaluation (PACE) trial with those who underwent allo‐SCT as reported to the European Bone Marrow Transplant registry, stratified by CML disease phase and Ph+ ALL, was conducted. Kaplan‐Meier survival curves and multivariate Cox proportional‐hazards models were used to compare OS between intervention groups, adjusting for time from diagnosis to intervention, age, sex, and geographic region; 24‐month and 48‐month OS rates and median OS were reported. RESULTS After adjustment for potential confounders, 24‐month and 48‐month OS rates were significantly higher in patients with chronic‐phase CML (CP‐CML) who received ponatinib compared with those who underwent allo‐SCT (24 months: 84% vs 60.5%, respectively; P = .004; 48 months: 72.7% vs 55.8%, respectively; P = .013), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.37 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16‐0.84; P = .017). In patients who had accelerated‐phase CML, OS rates were not significantly different between the groups (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.20‐4.10; P = .889). In patients who had blast‐crisis CML and those with Ph+ ALL, ponatinib was associated with shorter OS compared with allo‐SCT (blast‐crisis CML: HR, 2.29 [95% CI, 1.08‐4.82; P = .030]; Ph+ ALL: HR, 2.77 [95% CI, 0.73‐10.56; P = .146]). CONCLUSIONS Although allo‐SCT remains an important treatment option for patients with T315I‐positive advanced CML and Ph+ ALL, ponatinib represents a valuable alternative for patients with T315I‐positive CP‐CML. Cancer 2017;123:2875–80. © 2017 American Cancer Society., In patients who have chronic‐phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with the Philadelphia chromosome threonine to isoleucine mutation at codon 315, single‐agent ponatinib is associated with significantly longer overall survival compared with allogenic stem cell transplantation. In those who have accelerated‐phase CML, blast‐crisis CML, and Philadelphia chromosome‐positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the T315I mutation, single‐agent ponatinib is associated with similar or shorter overall survival compared with stem cell transplantation.