Search

BACKGROUND: Loop is an open-source automated insulin dosing system that allows users unrivaled control over system settings that affect future glucose prediction. Thousands use Loop, but little is known about those who discontinue. METHODS: In a large observational study, 874 Loop participants completed surveys and provided glycemic data, 46 (5.3%) of those self-identified as discontinuing Loop use during the observation window, 45 completed a discontinued use survey, 22 provided system settings data, and 19 participated in semistructured interviews about their discontinuation. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed. RESULTS: Older age and not trusting Loop were associated with discontinued use, although no other demographic or clinical characteristics were significant correlates. The most endorsed reasons were “I decided to try something else” (27.8%) followed by “It just didn't help as much as I thought it would” (22.2%). Qualitative analyses revealed prominent themes centered upon mental and emotional burden and adjusting settings. Other reasons for discontinued use included fear of disapproval of Loop use from diabetes provider, barriers to acquiring component devices, a desire to try new/different technologies, concerns that Loop could not accommodate specific exercise or low insulin dose regimens, and worry about Loop use during pregnancy. It was noted that burdens might be alleviated by enhanced technical assistance and expert guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of individuals in the Loop observational study continued use, those who discontinued reported similar challenges. Technical support and education specific to setting calculations could expand Loop benefits, alleviate burden, and support sustained use among new Loop users. Clinical Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03838900).

Objective: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Loop Do-It-Yourself automated insulin delivery system. Research Design and Methods: A prospective real-world observational study was conducted, which included 558 adults and children (age range 1–71 years, mean HbA1c 6.8% ± 1.0%) who initiated Loop either on their own or with community-developed resources and provided data for 6 months. Results: Mean time-in-range 70–180 mg/dL (TIR) increased from 67% ± 16% at baseline (before starting Loop) to 73% ± 13% during the 6 months (mean change from baseline 6.6%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.9%–7.4%; P

Background: Diabetes technology use is associated with favorable type 1 diabetes (T1D) outcomes. American youth with public insurance, a proxy for low socioeconomic status, use less diabetes technology than those with private insurance. We aimed to evaluate the role of insurance-mediated provider implicit bias, defined as the systematic discrimination of youth with public insurance, on diabetes technology recommendations for youth with T1D in the United States. Methods: Multi-disciplinary pediatric diabetes providers completed a bias assessment comprised of a clinical vignette and ranking exercises ( n = 39). Provider bias was defined as providers: (1) recommending more technology for those on private insurance versus public insurance or (2) ranking insurance in the top 2 of 7 reasons to offer technology. Bias and provider characteristics were analyzed with descriptive statistics, group comparisons, and multivariate logistic regression. Results: The majority of providers [44.1 ± 10.0 years old, 83% female, 79% non-Hispanic white, 49% physician, 12.2 ± 10.0 practice-years] demonstrated bias ( n = 33/39, 84.6%). Compared to the group without bias, the group with bias had practiced longer (13.4±10.4 years vs 5.7 ± 3.6 years, P = .003) but otherwise had similar characteristics including age (44.4 ± 10.2 vs 42.6 ± 10.1, p = 0.701). In the logistic regression, practice-years remained significant (OR = 1.47, 95% CI [1.02,2.13]; P = .007) when age, sex, race/ethnicity, provider role, percent public insurance served, and workplace location were included. Conclusions: Provider bias to recommend technology based on insurance was common in our cohort and increased with years in practice. There are likely many reasons for this finding, including healthcare system drivers, yet as gatekeepers to diabetes technology, providers may be contributing to inequities in pediatric T1D in the United States.

Objective: A subset of youth with T1D experience ongoing challenges with diabetes self-management, often due to social risk. This 5-site study examined which social factors were associated with hemoglobin A1c (A1c) , specifically in youth with preexisting high A1c. Methods: Youth with T1D for more than 1 year were included if between 12-17 years old and with at least one A1c value ≥10% in the past year. Chart review captured A1c values, and caregivers reported on social risk- with 16 risk variables (e.g., housing security, employment status) in initial analyses. Multivariable linear regression model included A1c from 1 year prior to enrollment as an outcome and backwards stepwise procedure retained covariates with p Results: Participants (n=130) had a mean age of 14.4 (±1.6) years and mean A1c of 11.1 (±1.7) ; 49% reported male gender; 51% self-identified as Non-Hispanic White. A1c prior to study enrollment was predicted to be 0.68 lower in individuals whose caregiver had at least a college education and 0.65 higher when caregivers were divorced or separated. Conclusion: Findings suggest that, in youth with preexisting difficulty with glycemic variability, caregiver education level and marital status are associated with A1c - and, while not causal, may reflect unique value when screening for risk. This cohort will be followed to determine which factors predict future health concerns and associated need for intervention. Disclosure D.V.Wagner: None. L.Yglecias: None. J.J.Flores garcia: None. E.Salcedo-rodriguez: None. A.Torres sanchez: None. P.Dasika: None. J.Viana: None. D.D.Williams: None. D.Ferro: None. M.A.Harris: None. M.A.Clements: Consultant; Glooko, Inc., Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Dexcom, Inc. J.Raymond: None. J.C.Wong: Consultant; Provention Bio, Inc., Research Support; Dexcom, Inc., Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. A.Reed: None. D.Naranjo: None. C.Jenisch: None. C.Cruz: None. S.Mitchell: None. Funding JDRF

Objective: Health disparities exist in diabetes technology access for those youth with T1D who experience high social risk, despite likely benefits. Novel Interventions in Children’s Healthcare (NICH) , designed to improve health for youth with T1D experiencing such disparities, has previously been associated with improved diabetes technology access. This study compares diabetes technology use prior to and after NICH referral, and is the first such study to include a control group. Methods: Youth with T1D served by NICH (n=65) and referred youth (“controls”: n=73) across 3 sites were included. EHR data included DKAs, hospitalizations, ED visits, and presence of diabetes technology 1 year prior and 2 years after NICH initiation. No significant demographic differences. Results: Compared to the controls, NICH youth were significantly more likely to gain a CGM and experience significantly greater reductions in hospital admits, DKAs, and ED visits. After accounting for prior differences, only DKA event reduction and CGM access continued to be significant. Youth in NICH also averaged more years with tech access. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that while youth referred to NICH experience substantial barriers to accessing diabetes technology, youth in NICH were more likely to gain CGM access and have fewer DKA events than controls - and neither group approached national averages in technology access. Disclosure J.Lely: None. M.A.Harris: None. D.Naranjo: None. C.Jenisch: None. A.F.Manabat: None. C.Cruz: None. R.Bensen: None. A.Bonilla ospina: None. D.V.Wagner: None. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Background: Prior studies of radial access for cardiac catheterization have focused on early adopters of the technique, and some have described a risk/treatment paradox of low radial access use among high bleeding risk patients. This study aimed to determine (1) trends in radial access use over time, (2) if increasing use of radial access is driven by new invasive and interventional cardiologists (operators) or existing operators changing their practice, and (3) if increasing radial rates are associated with lower bleeding rates and elimination of the risk/treatment paradox. Methods: In this cross-sectional study using data from the Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking Program, we calculated radial access rates and risk-adjusted postprocedural bleeding rates of patients undergoing diagnostic angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2011 and 2018 in Veterans Affairs hospitals. We used separate bleeding risk models for diagnostic angiography and PCI and assessed temporal trends with the Kendall Tau-b test. Results: Among 253 179 diagnostic angiograms and 93 614 PCIs, radial access rates increased over time for both diagnostic (17.5%–60.4%; P P P =0.02) but not PCI (3.4%–2.5%, P =0.20). Femoral access patients had a higher predicted risk for bleeding. Conclusions: A steady rise in radial access for diagnostic angiography and PCI was driven by increasing use among existing operators and high use by new operators. While this was associated with decreasing bleeding rates, a risk/treatment paradox for access site selection persists; patients at higher bleeding risk were still more likely to receive femoral access.

Background: Despite the demonstrated benefits of diabetes device use, uptake of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) remains quite low. The current study aimed to identify profiles ...

The State of Washington received a State Innovation Models (SIM) $65 million award from the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to improve population health and quality of care and reduce the growth of health care costs in the entire state, which has over 7 million residents. SIM is a "complex intervention" that implements several interacting components in a complex, decentralized health system to achieve goals, which poses challenges for evaluation. Our purpose is to present the state-level evaluation methods for Washington's SIM, a 3-year intervention (2016-2018). We apply the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) evaluation framework to structure our evaluation. We create a conceptual model and a plan to use multiple and mixed methods to study SIM performance in the RE-AIM components from a statewide, population-based perspective.

Background: Closed loop (CL) automated insulin delivery systems are demonstrated to be safe and effective in regulating glucose levels and reducing cognitive burden in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, given the limited market options and the do-it-yourself nature of most systems, it can be difficult for potential users to shape their expectations fitting them into daily lives and management routines. As such, we examined the potential feasibility of a virtual reality (VR) intervention. Methods: A four-part VR intervention was created to expose adults with T1D to expected CL system barriers: body image, perceived hassles of using CL, deskilling fears, and unwanted social attention. Goals of the pilot were to assess feasibility and expose patients to CL. Surveys were conducted pre- and postparticipating in the VR experience. Results: A total of 20 adults with T1D completed the pilot. Average time to complete the experience was 14.1 minutes (8.8-39.9). Reported VR sickness was low. Willingness to use VR was maintained in 90% ( n = 18) and did not change expectations of CL in 95% ( n = 19). Virtual reality changed perceived hassles of CL in 25% ( n = 5) with four concerned over alarms and one connectivity issues: positive diabetes technology attitudes, confidence in managing hypoglycemia, overall perceptions of appearance, and positive affect maintained after the VR intervention. Negative affect significantly decreased after exposure and perceptions of being overweight trended toward significance. Conclusion: This pilot VR intervention demonstrated high potential in addressing expected barriers to uptake and usage of CL systems without decreasing enthusiasm or changing expectations of CL.

Background The transradial approach (TRA) to cardiac catheterization is safer than the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA), with similar clinical effectiveness. However, adoption of TRA remains low, representing less than 50% of catheterization procedures in 2015. Peer coaching is one approach to facilitate implementation; however, the costs of this strategy for cardiac procedures such as TRA are unclear. Methods We conducted an activity-based costing analysis (ABC) of a multi-center, hybrid type III implementation trial of a coaching intervention designed to increase the use of TRA. We identified the key activities of the intervention and determined the personnel, resources, and time needed to complete each activity. The personnel cost per hour and the activity duration were then used to estimate the cost of each activity and the total variable cost of the implementation. Fixed costs related to designing and running the implementation were calculated separately. All costs are reported in 2019 constant US dollars. Results The total cost of the coaching intervention implementation was $374,863. Of the total cost, $367,752 were variable costs due to travel, preparatory work, in-person coaching, post-intervention evaluation, and administrative time. We estimated fixed costs of $7112. The mean marginal cost of implementing the intervention at only one additional medical center was $52,536. Conclusions We provide granular cost estimates of a conceptually rooted implementation strategy designed to increase the uptake of TRA for cardiac catheterization. We estimate that implementation costs stemming from the coaching approach would be offset after the conversion of approximately 409 to 1363 catheterizations from TFA to TRA. Our estimates provide benchmarks of the expected costs of implementing evidence-based, but expertise-intensive, cardiac procedures. Trial registration ISRCTN, ISRCTN66341299. Registered 7 July 2020—retrospectively registered

The Washington State Innovation Models (SIM) $65 million Test Award from the Center for Medicareamp; Medicaid Services' Innovation Center is a statewide intervention expected to improve population health, quality of care, and cost growth through four initiatives: 1) regional accountable communities of health linking health and social services to address local needs; 2) a practice transformation support hub; 3) four value-based payment reform pilot projects mainly in state employee and Medicaid populations; and 4) data and analytic infrastructure development to support system transformation with common measures. We develop a conceptual model based on diffusion theory and apply the RE-AIM evaluation framework (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) to structure our evaluation. We find that in three years (2016-2018), SIM built the infrastructure for system transformation and increased Washington's readiness for health system change in the next decade. However, the initiatives have not spread statewide, which may take over 10 years.

Background: Loop is an open-source do-it-yourself (DIY) automated insulin delivery system that allows users unrivaled control over physiologic settings that effect future glucose prediction. Over 9,000 individuals have adopted Loop, but little is known about those who discontinue. Methods: Twenty Loop users (14 adults and 6 caregivers; 60% female, 85% white, 75% household income >$100k/year, and HbA1c 6.7±1.0%) participated in semi-structured interviews about their experiences with Loop following discontinuation. Qualitative data were transcribed, coded, and analyzed. Results: Prominent themes reflected the perception that the stress, effort and/or time required to set up Loop and achieve management goals exceeded potential benefits. Two quotes: “I couldn’t spend any more time trying to work on my settings and trying to make it better,” and “I know I could get an improvement with it, but the problem was the cost of it⋯I couldn’t concentrate anymore at work⋯it felt like fog in my brain.” Technical issues with component devices, connectivity issues, lack of technical support, cost (time, energy, supplies), fear of provider disapproval, concerns related to pregnancy, exercise, hypoglycemia and managing low insulin doses, and desire to try other new technologies were among other reasons for ending use. Participants indicated that improved technical assistance and expert guidance might lead to them to use Loop again in the future. Conclusions: For those who manage to set up Loop there are additional challenges, even among individuals with adequate glycemic control and access to various financial, social, and personal resources. Technical support and education specific to setting calculations could expand Loop benefits, alleviate burden, and support sustained use among new Loop users. Disclosure J. J. Wong: None. S. Suttiratana: Employee; Spouse/Partner; CVS Health. M. S. Lanning: None. A. Dunlap: None. S. Hanes: None. K. K. Hood: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health, Cercacor, LifeScan Diabetes Institute. R. Lal: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Morgan Stanley, Tidepool. D. Naranjo: None. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Objective: Advancements in technology (insulin pumps, CGMs) for youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) hold promise for better outcomes, but multiple barriers to access exist, especially for underserved and underrepresented populations. Novel Interventions in Children’s Healthcare (NICH), was designed to improve health for youth with T1D and social vulnerabilities. NICH is associated with improvements in glycemic control and reductions in complications (DKA), but less is known regarding technology access for participating youth. This study aims to 1) identify prevalence of technology use prior to and after NICH initiation and 2) examine the relationship between technology access and NICH outcomes. Methods: Youth with T1D served by NICH (n=65) across three distinct geographical sites were included. EHR review included T1D complications (DKA), HbA1c values, and presence of T1D technology one year prior and two years following initiation of NICH services. Mean age was 15.0 years (SD=3.5); 52% female; 73% non-Hispanic White. Results: Ten percent of youth had access to technology prior to NICH (pump=8%; CGM=2%), and 22% had access to technology 2 years post NICH initiation (pump=17%; CGM=14%). Youth were significantly more likely to gain access to CGMs (p Conclusion: With rates of access hovering around 40% for CGMs and 50% for pumps, this study demonstrates that 1) youth referred to NICH experience substantial barriers to accessing T1D technology, 2) NICH participation is associated with increased access to T1D technology for socially vulnerable youth, and 3) despite program involvement, technology access inequities persist. Disclosure J. Lely: None. M. A. Harris: None. D. Naranjo: None. C. Jenisch: None. W. C. Cadiz: None. R. Bensen: None. J. Viana: None. D. V. Wagner: None. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust; BUILD EXITO Foundation; Central Oregon Health Council

Background: Loop is an open-source AID system used by more than 9,000 people with type 1 diabetes. Understanding the pros and cons of Loop use may help improve disease management and support population level innovation. Methods: Focus groups illuminated 72 new and experienced users’ perspectives on Loop uptake, use and persistence. Participants were predominately white (95%), male (50%), privately insured (94%), reported annual household income ≥ $100K (73%) and education exceeding a bachelor’s degree (87%) with a mean HbA1c of 6.6±0.8%. Twenty discontinuers who stopped using Loop during the study (60% female, 85% white, 85% privately insured) completed interviews. Qualitative data, collected as part of the larger observational study, were analyzed and synthesized by a multidisciplinary team. Results: High frequency thematic content described experiences with: a) technical support and troubleshooting, b) decreased mental/behavioral burden, c) technical issues with parts of the system, d) glycemic control, e) personalizing settings, and f) providers while using Loop. Users also emphatically highlighted the effects of Loop on overnight experiences and the role that “Loop communities” played during use. Decreased burden was the most endorsed benefit characterized by less worry, stress, and cognitive effort; less time spent on diabetes management tasks, and more space to think about nondiabetes aspects of life. The most discussed drawback was having technical issues with any part of the system including challenges with insulin pumps, CGMs, infusion sites, signal loss, the app, and/or the algorithm. A range of provider attitudes and knowledge about Loop complicated users’ disclosure and experiences. Conclusions: This sample of Loop users reported benefits to quality of life and glycemic control that outweighed challenges of setting up system components and adjusting settings. Users reported being empowered by the customizability and educational effects of the open-source AID system. Disclosure S. Suttiratana: Employee; Spouse/Partner; CVS Health. J. J. Wong: None. M. S. Lanning: None. A. Dunlap: None. S. Hanes: None. K. K. Hood: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health, Cercacor, LifeScan Diabetes Institute. R. Lal: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Morgan Stanley, Tidepool. D. Naranjo: None. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Background: Access to psychosocial services is limited, especially during a pandemic. A Zoom-delivered family-based intervention for adolescents with type 1 diabetes has the potential to enhance access to psychosocial services. Methods: Nine families enrolled in a pilot of a 6-session online (Zoom) intervention for adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected via online focus groups and surveys. Results: Teens’ ages ranged from 12-17 years (M=14.9, SD=1.76) and most self-identified as male (78%). All parents self-identified as female and most families self-identified as non-Hispanic white (78%). Qualitative results revealed that participants found the program to be generally helpful and would recommend the program to others. Perceived benefits included increased parental empathy toward teens, enhanced parental involvement in teens’ diabetes management, and decreased parent-teen conflict. Participants conveyed that these benefits were particularly impactful given increased family contact and tensions related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Identified areas for improvement included adding follow-up group sessions with parents to maintain program impact on parenting over time and to target teens in early adolescence, when family dynamics are more malleable. Quantitative results from paired t-tests of pre-post comparisons revealed no significant differences in teen or parental diabetes distress or depression (all p>0.05), but should be interpreted with caution due to small sample size. Conclusions: Adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents responded positively to this program and found it particularly relevant during the current pandemic. Zoom delivery of these programs may be instrumental in their feasibility, acceptability, and ultimately dissemination in the future. Disclosure J. J. Wong: None. M. S. Lanning: None. J. Ngo: None. C. A. Wu: None. S. Hanes: None. H. M. Linzmeyer: None. D. Naranjo: None. K. K. Hood: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health, Cercacor, LifeScan Diabetes Institute. Funding National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1K23DK121771-01A1)

The Project Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes (ECHO™) model addresses disparities by empowering primary care provider (PCPs), through tele-education, to meet the needs of underserved communities lacking access to subspecialty care. Given the rapid replication of this model, it is vital to understand the perspectives of participating PCPs to refine program implementation. Project ECHO™ Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) program was piloted in Florida and California with >15 Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHC). PCPs completed pre/post-test surveys assessing knowledge and confidence in T1D care. Exit surveys and focus groups were conducted to understand their experiences (N=92 providers, 41 from FL and 51 from CA were queried). Qualitative analysis of open-ended survey feedback and thematic analysis of focus group data used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). The CFIR identifies five domains that affect intervention implementation - including internal and external factors to the healthcare organization. Pre/post surveys demonstrated significant improvements in providers’ diabetes knowledge; mean ± SD change in score for an 11-item knowledge evaluation from pre/post: (1.0 ± 1.8, [Min: -2, Max: +5], p-value: 0.0003) and increase in overall confidence evaluated on a 4-point likert scale (0.6 ± 0.4 [Min: -0.1, Max: 1.6] p-value Disclosure A. F. Walker: None. S. L. Filipp: None. K. Turner: None. G. L. Zori: None. J. Maizel: None. N. Cuttriss: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health. L. G. Baer: None. L. Figg: None. K. K. Hood: Consultant; Self; Cecelia Health, Cercacor, LifeScan Diabetes Institute. R. Lal: Consultant; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Biolinq, Capillary Biomedical, Inc., Morgan Stanley, Tidepool. M. Basina: None. M. J. Haller: Board Member; Self; SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc., Consultant; Self; MannKind Corporation, Other Relationship; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. J. J. Wong: None. K. Yabut: None. D. Naranjo: None. E. Lewit: None. D. M. Maahs: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott Diabetes, Dompe, Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Self; aditxt. E. Sheehan: None. S. C. Westen: None. C. Anez-zabala: None. X. Roque: None. B. C. Fitzgerald: None. A. Bernier: None. M. J. Gurka: None. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Background Cost is a major consideration in the uptake and continued use of diabetes technology. With increasing use of automated insulin delivery systems, it is important to understand the specific cost-related barriers to technology adoption. In this qualitative analysis, we were interested in understanding and examining the decision-making process around cost and diabetes technology use. Materials and methods Four raters coded transcripts of four stakeholder groups using inductive coding for each stakeholder group to establish relevant themes/nodes. We applied the Social Ecological Model in the interpretation of five thematic levels of cost. Results We identified five thematic levels of cost: policy, organizational, insurance, interpersonal, and individual. Equitable diabetes technology access was an important policy-level theme. The insurance-level theme had multiple sub-themes which predominantly carried a negative valence. Participants also emphasized the psychosocial burden of cost specifically identifying diabetes costs to their families, the guilt of diabetes related costs, and frustration in the time and involvement required to ensure insurance coverage. Conclusion We found broad consensus in how cost is experienced by stakeholder groups. Cost considerations for diabetes technology uptake extended beyond finances to include time, cost to society, morality, and interpersonal relationships. Cost also reflected an important moral principle tied to the shared desire for equitable access to diabetes technology. Knowledge of these considerations can help clinicians and researchers promote equitable device uptake while anticipating barriers for all persons living with type 1 diabetes and their families.

OBJECTIVE To assess the association between debt burden and self-reported suicide attempt among US adults. METHODS Data from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III (2012-2013) were used to estimate the association between self-reported past-year debt burden and past-year and lifetime suicide attempt with logistic regression, controlling for sociodemographic characteristics with known associations with debt burden and suicide attempt. RESULTS Among 36,278 adults aged ≥ 18 years, 13.03% reported past-year debt burden, 0.37% reported past-year suicide attempt, and 5.16% reported lifetime suicide attempt. Self-reported attempt was more likely for persons reporting debt burden than for those without (eg, for past-year suicide attempt: odds ratio [OR] = 7.96 [95% CI, 5.45-11.64; P

Determinando como piedra angular de todo el sistema de información en todos los niveles de atención de salud a una historia clínica de calidad, concordamos que es un tema esencial en nuestra práctica diaria, conceptualizando a una historia clínica adecuadamente confeccionada como la constancia escrita de todos los exámenes médicos, estudios realizados y tratamientos aplicados durante el transcurso de la enfermedad , el obtuvo principal del estudio fue conocer el grado de cumplimentación de la historia clínica en el Servicio de Consulta Externa de una Unidad de Primer Nivel de Atención, para evaluar áreas de mejora. Se realizó un Estudio descriptivo transversal, con análisis del porcentaje de cumplimentación de veinte variables en 147 ingresos atendidos en la consulta externa de la Unidad Anidad Chunchi durante 6 meses. Para el análisis de datos se creó una base de datos en Microsoft Excel 2016. De las 20 variables analizadas en el presente estudio se encontró que, en cuanto a la calidad de la documentación clínica utilizada, los datos clínico-estadísticos y la fecha de atención estaban presentes en el 100%, antecedentes familiares (73%), antecedentes personales de interés (82%), hábitos tóxicos (8%), motivo de consulta (95%), el diagnóstico, las órdenes terapéuticas y los signos vitales (100%). El 96% de las historias incluían las hojas de evolución. El 86% de las historias clínicas tenían realizadas el post consulta por parte de enfermería. El 59% de la documentación revisada es legible sin dificultad y el 41% es legible con alguna dificultad. El 68% de las historias clínicas poseían los formularos llenados de manera correcta de acuerdo con la edad. La calidad del registro es variable, aceptable en codificación diagnóstica, datos estadísticos y fecha de atención y deficitaria en antecedentes personales, hábitos, a pesar de la alta cumplimentación (>95%) de motivo de consulta y juicio clínico, se subraya la relevancia del incumplimiento del llenado documentario en un 41 % con datos legibles y comprensibles.

Aims: This study examined the psychosocial impact of Loop, an open-source automated insulin dosing system that has emerged from the diabetes technology “Do-It-Yourself” (DIY) movement. Methods: Subsamples of 239 adults, 115 children, and 243 parents completed data collection at the time of Loop initiation and 3 and 6 months later. Surveys collected demographic and clinical information, percent time-in-range, HbA1c, and validated psychosocial measures. Analyses included paired t tests and McNemar’s tests to compare psychosocial functioning at 3 and 6 months and regression models to assess baseline predictors of psychosocial outcomes at 6 months. Results: Adults reported significant improvements in diabetes distress ( t = −7.20 P < .001; t = −8.01, P < .001), sleep quality ( t = 6.81, P < .001; t = 2.98, P = .003), fear of hypoglycemia ( t = −4.42, P < .001; t = −4.97, P < .001), and hypoglycemia confidence ( t = 8.68, P < .001; t = 7.96 P < .001) from baseline to 3 months and 6 months, respectively. Significant improvements in parents’ and children’s sleep quality and parents’ fear of hypoglycemia were also observed. Several baseline characteristics were associated with psychosocial outcomes at 6 months. Conclusions: The current findings support the broad and sustained benefits of Loop across multiple aspects of psychosocial well-being. Advancement and dissemination of such technologies has the potential to improve mental and physiological health among people living with type 1 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE Limited research has examined the impact of technology on intimacy and relationships among individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D). The current study examined the experiences of individuals with T1D and their partners and evaluated the expectations for how advances in technology such as automated insulin delivery systems may impact physical intimacy. METHOD The Insulin Delivery Systems: Perceptions, Ideas, Reflections and Expectations (INSPIRE) study is a multisite study examining expectations for automated insulin delivery systems among adults and youth with T1D as well as partners and caregivers. For the current analysis, data regarding the impact of diabetes on relationship intimacy were extracted from focus groups or individual semistructured interviews with adults with T1D (n = 113) and partners of individuals with T1D (n = 55). RESULTS Three independent coders conducted thematic analysis utilizing NVivo software. Two primary themes were identified: vulnerability in romantic relationships because of managing diabetes and the unique challenges of physical intimacy because of the use of diabetes technology. CONCLUSIONS Participants expressed the hope that diabetes technology, and automated insulin delivery systems in particular, will offer opportunities for flexibility in their diabetes management. These options may decrease their sense of vulnerability through provision of greater control over diabetes management and when/whether to disclose diabetes, minimizing discomforts in the context of sexual intimacy, and reduction of fear about diabetes complications. Patient-reported outcomes and expectations for diabetes technology should be incorporated into patient-provider conversations about sensitive issues. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Aims Psychosocial screenings are recommended and increasingly common in pediatric subspecialty clinics, though little is known about their acceptability. This study seeks to uncover profiles of acceptability and assess demographic and clinical correlates among adolescents with diabetes. Methods A sample of 124 adolescents (57.7% female) ages 12–21 years (M = 16.2 ± 2.3) completed screenings during routine diabetes appointments. K-means clustering of responses to acceptability items derived profiles; Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and Chi-square tests assessed correlates. Results Adolescents with the most common profile (72.6%) placed high importance on medical providers’ awareness of their emotions and reported no difficulties/discomfort with the screener. These youth had moderate depressive symptoms, low diabetes distress, and low A1c. Those who fit a less common profile (18.5%) were uncomfortable with the screener and had the highest depressive symptoms and lowest A1c. Youth who fit a smaller profile (6.5%) endorsed technical difficulties and had high depressive symptoms and lowest diabetes distress. The smallest profile (2.4%, N = 3) had difficulty understanding and experienced discomfort with the screening and had the lowest depressive symptoms and the highest diabetes distress and A1c. These differences in depressive symptoms (F = 3.54, p = .017), A1c values (F = 4.03, p = .009), and diabetes distress (F = 3.27, p = .036) were significant though differences in age, gender, and diabetes duration were not. Conclusions Most youth responded favorably to in-clinic psychosocial screenings. Youth who were less satisfied were at increased risk for psychosocial and medical complications. Findings highlight areas of need, such as enhanced support with and an emphasized rationale for screenings, which may improve patient experience in subspecialty care.

Disparities in the use of CGMs and insulin pumps in T1D based on socioeconomic status (SES) and race/ethnicity are pronounced. However, systematic reports of perspectives from patients in vulnerable communities are limited. To better understand barriers, focus groups were conducted in Florida and California with adults with T1D. Selection criteria included hospitalization for DKA, HbA1C >9%, or receiving care at a Federally Qualified Health Center. A total of 16 focus groups were conducted in English or Spanish with 86 adults (Table 1). Transcript themes and pre-focus group demographic survey data were analyzed. In order of frequency, barriers to diabetes technology included: (1) provider-level (overtly blocked/discouraged by provider) (2) system-level (financial barriers related to coverage) and (3) individual-level (difficulty with use or preference issues). In Florida there was less technology use overall (38% had used CGMs in FL, 63% in CA; 43% had used pumps in FL, 69% in CA) and significant differences in pump use by SES (P=0.02 in FL, P=0.08 in CA) and race/ethnicity (P=0.01 in FL, P=0.80 in CA). In California there were significant differences in CGM use by race/ethnicity (P=0.05 in CA, P=0.56 in FL) and education level (P=0.02 in CA, P=0.90 in FL). These findings provide novel insights and demonstrate the need for multi-level interventions and further research on variations in technology use based on geographic location. Disclosure A.F. Walker: None. N. Cuttriss: None. M.J. Haller: Advisory Panel; Self; SAB Biotherapeutics, Inc. S.L. Filipp: None. K. Yabut: None. C. Anez-Zabala: None. K.K. Hood: Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; LifeScan, Inc., MedIQ. X. Roque: None. D. Naranjo: None. G. Aulisio: None. A. Addala: None. S. Look: None. M.J. Gurka: None. D.M. Maahs: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Insulet Corporation, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S. Consultant; Self; Abbott, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Bigfoot Biomedical, Dexcom, Inc., Roche Diabetes Care, Tandem Diabetes Care. Funding The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust

Background: Psychosocial screening is recommended and increasingly common, but little is known about youths’ perspectives on screenings. Methods: One hundred and twenty-four adolescents (57.7% female) ages 12-21 years (M=16.2±2.3) completed routine, clinic-integrated screenings. K-means clustering derived profiles and ANOVA assessed correlates profiles. Results: Four distinct profiles emerged (Table 1). Profiles varied by depression (F=3.54, p=0.017), diabetes distress (F=3.27, p=0.036), and A1c values (F=4.03, p=0.009). Majority (72.6%) placed high importance on diabetes teams awareness about their emotions and reported no difficulties/discomfort (Embracers). Those uncomfortable with screening (Avoiders) were most depressed and had lowest A1C. Youth who endorsed difficulties with tablet and placed low importance about team awareness about their emotions (Skeptics) had relatively high depression but least diabetes distress. A small fourth group (Strugglers; n=3) must be interpreted with caution due to size. No differences were found for age, gender, diabetes duration/type, race/ethnicity, self-rated global health, or anxiety. Conclusions: Most youth responded favorably to in-clinic psychosocial screenings. Those less satisfied may have increased mental health risk and may benefit from technical support and an emphasized rationale for screenings. Disclosure J.J. Wong: None. S. Hanes: None. M.S. Lanning: None. M.L. Tanenbaum: None. D. Naranjo: None. K.K. Hood: Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; LifeScan, Inc., MedIQ.

The State of Washington received a State Innovation Models (SIM) $65 million award from the federal Centers for MedicareMedicaid Services to improve population health and quality of care and reduce the growth of health care costs in the entire state, which has over 7 million residents. SIM is a "complex intervention" that implements several interacting components in a complex, decentralized health system to achieve goals, which poses challenges for evaluation. Our purpose is to present the state-level evaluation methods for Washington's SIM, a 3-year intervention (2016-2018). We apply the RE-AIM (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance) evaluation framework to structure our evaluation. We create a conceptual model and a plan to use multiple and mixed methods to study SIM performance in the RE-AIM components from a statewide, population-based perspective.

International audience; Glycemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) remains a challenge for many, despite the availability of modern diabetes technology. While technologies have proven glycemic benefits and may reduce excess mortality in some populations, both mortality and complication rates remain significantly higher in T1DM than the general population. Diabetes technology can reduce some burdens of diabetes self-management, however, it may also increase anxiety, stress, and diabetes-related distress. Additional workload associated with diabetes technologies and the dominant focus on metabolic control may be at the expense of quality-of-life. Diabetes is associated with significantly increased risk of suicidal ideation, self-harm, and suicide. The risk increases for those with diabetes and comorbid mood disorder. For example, the prevalence of depression is significantly higher in people with diabetes than the general population, and thus, people with diabetes are at even higher risk of suicide. The Center for Disease Control and Prevention reported a 24% rise in US national suicide rates between 1999 and 2014, the highest in 30 years. In the United Kingdom, 6000 suicides occur annually. Rates of preventable self-injury mortality stand at 29.1 per 100 000 population. Individuals with diabetes have an increased risk of suicide, being three to four times more likely to attempt suicide than the general population. Furthermore, adolescents aged 15 to 19 are most likely to present at emergency departments for self-inflicted injuries (9.6 per 1000 visits), with accidents, alcohol-related injuries, and self-harm being the strongest risk factors for suicide, the second leading cause of death among 10 to 24 year olds. While we have developed tools to improve glycemic control, we must be cognizant that the psychological burden of chronic disease is a significant problem for this vulnerable population. It is crucial to determine the psychosocial and behavioral predictors to uptake and continued use of technology in order to aid the identification of those individuals most likely to realize benefits of any intervention as well as those individuals who may require more support to succeed with technology.

Background: Diabetes devices such as insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) are associated with improved health and quality of life in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D). However, uptake remains low. The aim of this study was to develop different “personas” of adults with T1D in relation to readiness to adopt new diabetes technology. Methods: Participants were 1498 T1D Exchange participants who completed surveys on barriers to uptake, technology attitudes, and other psychosocial variables. HbA1c data was available from the T1D Exchange for 30% of the sample. K-means cluster analyses grouped the sample by device barriers and attitudes. The authors assigned descriptive labels based on cluster characteristics. ANOVAs and chi-square tests assessed group differences by demographic and psychosocial variables (eg, diabetes duration, diabetes distress). Results: Analyses yielded five distinct personas. The d-Embracers (54% of participants) endorsed few barriers to device use and had the highest rates of device use, lowest HbA1c, and were the least distressed. The Free Rangers (23%) had the most negative technology attitudes. The Data Minimalists (10%) used pumps but had lower CGM use and did not want more diabetes information. The Wary Wearers (11%) had lower overall device use, were younger, more distressed, endorsed many barriers, and had higher HbA1c. The High Distress (3%) group members were the youngest, had the shortest diabetes duration, reported the most barriers, and were the most distressed. Conclusion: These clinically meaningful personas of device readiness can inform tailored interventions targeting barriers and psychosocial needs to increase device uptake.

Background Despite growing attention to diabetes throughout Asia, data from Southeast Asia are limited. This article reports rates of diabetes, hypertension and obesity in Cambodia. Methods Two studies were conducted across different regions of Cambodia: a 2012 screening study across urban, semi-urban and rural areas that used point of care capillary glucose for determination of diabetes (n = 13,997) and a 2005 epidemiological study with random selection from two main urban areas that used oral glucose tolerance tests for determination of diabetes (n = 1,863). Blood pressure and anthropometrics were also measured. Results In the screening study, urban sites showed significantly higher rates of diabetes than rural sites; semi-urban rates were intermediate. There was a significant dose–response effect for urbanicity on overweight, obesity, and waist-to-hip ratio with higher rates for urban vs semi-urban and semi-urban vs rural locales. Rural sites had the lowest hypertension rates followed by urban and then semi-urban. Among persons who screened positive for diabetes, there was a dose–response effect for urbanicity on undiagnosed diabetes; rates of previously undiagnosed diabetes were lowest in urban (51%) vs semi-urban (55%) vs rural locales (67%). Rural participants reported the highest rates of smoking and alcohol use. In the urban epidemiological study, prevalence rates of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance were approximately 10%, indicating a prevalence of total glucose intolerance of approximately 20%. Conclusions Diabetes rates in Cambodia are high and disproportionately affect urban residents. A public health response is urgently needed; as development continues, rates of diabetes are expected to rise.

Automated closed loop systems will greatly change type 1 diabetes management; user trust will be essential for acceptance of this new technology. This qualitative study explored trust in 32 individuals following a hybrid closed loop trial. Participants described how context-, system-, and person-level factors influenced their trust in the system. Participants attempted to override the system when they lacked trust, while trusting the system decreased self-management burdens and decreased stress. Findings highlight considerations for fostering trust in closed loop systems. Systems may be able to engage users by offering varying levels of controls to match trust preferences.

Purpose The first hybrid closed loop (HCL) system, which automates insulin delivery but requires user inputs, was approved for treatment of type 1 diabetes (T1D) by the US Food and Drug Administration in September 2016. The purpose of this study was to explore the benefits, expectations, and attitudes of individuals with T1D following a clinical trial of an HCL system. Methods Thirty-two individuals with T1D (17 adults, 15 adolescents) participated in focus groups after 4 to 5 days of system use. Content analysis generated themes regarding perceived benefits, hassles, and limitations. Results Some participants felt misled by terms such as “closed loop” and “artificial pancreas,” which seemed to imply a more “hands-off” experience. Perceived benefits were improved glycemic control, anticipated reduction of long-term complications, better quality of life, and reduced mental burden of diabetes. Hassles and limitations included unexpected tasks for the user, difficulties wearing the system, concerns about controlling highs, and being reminded of diabetes. Conclusion Users are willing to accept some hassles and limitations if they also perceive health and quality-of-life benefits beyond current self-management. It is important for clinicians to provide a balanced view of positives and negatives to help manage expectations.

Nicotine replacement therapy is an effective intervention for smoking cessation, but adherence tends to be low. This article presents results from a pilot evaluation of a brief smoking cessation treatment to improve adherence to the nicotine patch among Latino smokers living with HIV/AIDS. Forty smokers were randomized to receive either a standard 5 As counseling session and 8-week treatment of nicotine patch, or a similar intervention that added a 10-min module to the 5 As counseling that focused on improving adherence to the nicotine patch. Smoking outcomes (breath carbon monoxide monitoring verified 7-day point prevalence and continuous abstinence) were evaluated through a 3-month follow-up. Patch usage during the follow-up period was also assessed. Intention to treat analyses indicated that abstinence rates were 2 to 3 times higher in the adherence condition compared with the standard condition (7-day point prevalence abstinence: 35.0% vs. 15.0%; continuous abstinence: 30.0% vs. 10.0%). Nicotine patch compliance over an 8-week period was also higher in the adherence condition than in the standard condition (44% vs. 25%). Although this small pilot was conducted to estimate effect sizes and was not powered to detect group differences, results are promising and suggest that adding a 10-min module focused on nicotine patch adherence to a standard 5 As protocol can increase abstinence rates. Given that this smoking cessation treatment was not specifically tailored to either HIV-positive smokers or Latino smokers, future research should examine whether it may be a promising approach for improving nicotine patch adherence in the general population of smokers. (PsycINFO Database Record

OBJECTIVE Diabetes devices (insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitors [CGMs]) are associated with benefits for glycemic control, yet uptake of these devices continues to be low. Some barriers to device uptake may be modifiable through psychosocial intervention, but little is known about which barriers and which patients to target. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We surveyed 1,503 adult T1D Exchange participants (mean age 35.3 [SD 14.8] years, mean diagnosis duration 20.4 [SD 12.5] years) to investigate barriers to device uptake, understand profiles of device users versus nonusers, and explore differences by age and sex. Scales used were the Diabetes Distress Scale, Technology Use Attitudes (General and Diabetes-Specific), and Barriers to Device Use and Reasons for Discontinuing Devices. RESULTS Most commonly endorsed modifiable barriers were related to the hassle of wearing devices (47%) and disliking devices on one’s body (35%). CGM users (37%) were older than nonusers (mean 38.3 vs. 33.5 years), had diabetes for longer (22.9 vs. 18.8 years), had more positive technology attitudes (22.6–26.0 vs. 21.4–24.8), and reported fewer barriers to using diabetes technology than nonusers (3.3 vs. 4.3). The youngest age-group (18–25 years) had the lowest CGM (26% vs. 40–48%) and insulin pump (64% vs. 69–77%) uptake, highest diabetes distress (2.2 vs. 1.8–2.1), and highest HbA1c levels (8.3% [67 mmol/mol] vs. 7.2–7.4% [55–57 mmol/mol]). CONCLUSIONS Efforts to increase device use need to target physical barriers to wearing devices. Because young adults had the lowest device uptake rates, highest distress, and highest HbA1c compared with older age-groups, they should be the focus of future interventions to increase device use.

BACKGROUND Youth with diabetes are at increased risk for depression. However, severity and correlates of depressive symptoms may differ by diabetes type. OBJECTIVE Associations of depressive symptoms with global health, diabetes duration, and gender were compared between youth with type 1 and type 2 diabetes. METHODS A sample of 149 youth ages 12 to 21 diagnosed with either type 1 (n = 122) or type 2 (n = 27) diabetes were screened during routine clinic appointments. Regression models were constructed to examine differences by diabetes type. RESULTS Adolescents with type 2 diabetes had significantly higher depressive symptom scores (4.89 vs 2.99, P = .025) than those with type 1 diabetes. A significant interaction between global health and diabetes type on depressive symptoms revealed inverse associations between global health and depressive symptoms that was stronger among youth with type 2 diabetes (β = -.98, P

Background: Members of our group previously reported that monetary reinforcement of SMBG related behaviors shows robust increases in frequency of SMBG and modest decreases in A1c among youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D). In these secondary data analyses, we explored effects on psychosocial functioning. Methods: Sixty youth ages 12-21 (Mage=15.58, SD=2.31) with T1D, A1c 7.5-13%, and Results: Generalized linear models showed no significant time x condition effects. In t-tests at discrete follow-ups, compared to the control group, the reinforce group had significantly lower youth-reported diabetes related family conflict at 12 weeks (22.39 vs. 25.11, p=.043) and significantly higher negative affective responses to out-of-range glucose results at 24 weeks (13.62 vs. 11.71, p=.047). Conclusion: Monetary reinforcers targeting SMBG behaviors may produce transitory decreases in youth perceptions of family conflict and transitory iatrogenic increases in youth’s negative affective responses to out-of-range glucose results. The timing of changes in family conflict, negative affect, and previously reported changes in A1c suggest that psychosocial changes may reflect youth responses to A1c as well as to reinforcers per se. For broader effects, the intervention could include psychosocial components that seek to directly maintain decreased family conflict and mitigate negative affect related to increased awareness of glucose control. Disclosure J.J. Wong: None. A. Addala: None. K.K. Hood: Consultant; Self; Lilly Diabetes. Research Support; Self; Dexcom, Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute. J. Wagner: None. E. Cengiz: Advisory Panel; Self; Abvance, ADOCIA, MannKind Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. E.M. Tichy: None. K. Weyman: None. D. Naranjo: Advisory Panel; Spouse/Partner; Eli Lilly and Company. Speaker's Bureau; Spouse/Partner; Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute. Other Relationship; Self; Abbott. Funding National Institutes of Health

Hybrid closed loop (HCL) systems are designed to automate insulin delivery to improve type 1 diabetes (T1D) outcomes and reduce user burden and distress. Because the systems only automate some aspects of diabetes care, psychosocial and human factors remain an important consideration in their use. Thus, we examined whether psychosocial and human factors (i.e., distress related to diabetes management, fear of hypoglycemia, and technology attitudes) would (1) change after using the system and (2) predict glycemic outcomes during the trial.Fourteen adults and 15 adolescents with T1D participated in a multisite clinical trial of an investigational version of the MiniMed™ 670G system (Medtronic, Northridge, CA) over 4 to 5 days in a semisupervised outpatient setting. Users completed surveys assessing psychosocial and human factors before beginning the HCL system and at the conclusion of the study. t-Tests and regression analyses were conducted to examine whether these factors changed following trial exposure to the HCL system and predicted glycemic outcomes during the trial.Diabetes management distress decreased and diabetes technology attitudes became more positive over the trial period. Fear of hypoglycemia did not change over the trial period. There was a trend toward greater pretrial management distress predicting less time in range during the trial, controlling for time in range before the trial.Results suggest that this system is promising for enhancing technology attitudes and reducing management distress. Psychosocial factors, such as management distress, may negatively impact glycemic outcomes and should be a priority area for further investigation.

Background:Many people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) report barriers to using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Diabetes care providers may have their own barriers to promoting CGM uptake. The goal of this study was to develop clinician “personas” with regard to readiness to promote CGM uptake.Methods:Diabetes care providers who treat people with T1D (N = 209) completed a survey on perceived patient barriers to device uptake, technology attitudes, and characteristics and barriers specific to their clinical practice. K-means cluster analyses grouped the sample by CGM barriers and attitudes. ANOVAs and chi-square tests assessed group differences on provider and patient characteristics. The authors assigned descriptive names for each persona.Results:Analyses yielded three clinician personas regarding readiness to promote CGM uptake. Ready clinicians (20% of sample; 24% physicians, 38% certified diabetes educators/CDEs) had positive technology attitudes, had clinic time to work with patients using CGM, and found it easy to keep up with technology advances. In comparison, Cautious clinicians (41% of sample; 17% physicians, 53% CDEs) perceived that their patients had many barriers to adopting CGM and had less time than the Ready group to work with patients using CGM data. Not Yet Ready clinicians (40% of sample; 9% physicians; 79% CDEs) had negative technology attitudes and the least clinic time to work with CGM data. They found it difficult to keep up with technology advances.Conclusion:Some diabetes clinicians may benefit from tailored interventions and additional time and resources to empower them to help facilitate increased uptake of CGM technology.

Purpose Adolescents with chronic illness face greater risk of psychosocial difficulties, complicating disease management. Despite increased calls to screen for patient-reported outcomes, clinical implementation has lagged. Using quality improvement methods, this study aimed to investigate the feasibility of standardized screening for depression and assessment of global health and to determine recommended behavioral health follow-up, across three pediatric subspecialty clinics. Methods A total of 109 patients aged 12–22 years (median = 16.6) who were attending outpatient visits for treatment of diabetes (80% type 1), inflammatory bowel disease, or cystic fibrosis completed the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) depression and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pediatric Global Health measures on electronic tablets. Patients screening positive on the PHQ-9 received same-day behavioral health assessment and regular phone check-ins to facilitate necessary follow-up care. Results Overall, 89% of 122 identified patients completed screening during a 6-month window. Patients completed measures in a timely manner (within 3 minutes) without disruption to clinic flow, and they rated the process as easy, comfortable, and valuable. Depression scores varied across disease type. Patients rated lower global health relative to a previously assessed validation cohort. Depression and global health related significantly to certain medical outcomes. Fifteen percent of patients screened positive on the PHQ-9, of whom 50% confirmed attending behavioral health appointments within 6 months of screening. Conclusions A standardized depression and global health assessment protocol implemented across pediatric subspecialties was feasible and effective. Universal behavioral health screening for adolescents and young adults living with chronic disease is necessary to meet programmatic needs in pediatric subspecialty clinics.

Despite growing attention to diabetes throughout Asia, data from Southeast Asia are limited. This article reports rates of diabetes, hypertension, and obesity in Cambodia.Two studies were conducted across different regions of Cambodia: (i) a 2012 screening study across urban, semi-urban, and rural areas that used point-of-care capillary glucose for determination of diabetes (n = 13 997); and (ii) a 2005 epidemiological study with random selection from two main urban areas that used oral glucose tolerance tests for determination of diabetes (n = 1863). Blood pressure and anthropometrics were also measured.In the screening study, rates of diabetes were significantly higher in urban than rural sites, with intermediate rates in semi-urban areas. There was a significant dose-response effect for urbanicity on overweight, obesity, and waist:hip ratio, with higher rates for urban versus semi-urban and for semi-urban versus rural locales. Rural sites had the lowest rates of hypertension, followed by urban and semi-urban sites. Among people who screened positive for diabetes, there was a dose-response effect for urbanicity on undiagnosed diabetes; rates of previously undiagnosed diabetes were lowest in urban (51%), followed by semi-urban (55%) and rural (67%) locales. Rural participants reported the highest rates of smoking and alcohol use. In the urban epidemiological study, prevalence rates of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance were approximately 10%, indicating a prevalence of total glucose intolerance of approximately 20%.In Cambodia, diabetes rates are high among urban residents and undiagnosed diabetes is highest among rural residents. A country-wide public health response is urgently needed; as development continues, rates of diabetes are expected to rise.

BackgroundDuring an earthquake, vulnerable populations, especially those with chronic conditions, are more susceptible to adverse, event-induced exacerbation of chronic conditions such as limited access to food and water, extreme weather temperatures, and injury. These circumstances merit special attention when health care facilities and organizations prepare for and respond to disasters.MethodsThis study explores the relationship between pre-earthquake burden of illness and postearthquake health-related and preparedness factors in the US. Data from a cohort of male veterans who were receiving care at the Sepulveda Veterans Affairs Medical Center (VAMC) in Los Angeles, California USA during the 1994 Northridge earthquake were analyzed.ResultsVeterans with one or more chronic conditions were more likely to report pain lasting two or more days, severe mental/emotional stress for more than two weeks, broken/lost medical equipment, having difficulty refilling prescriptions, and being unable to get medical help following the quake compared to veterans without chronic conditions. In terms of personal emergency preparedness, however, there was no association between burden of illness and having enough food or water for at least 24 hours after the earthquake.ConclusionThe relationship that exists between health care providers, including both individual providers and organizations like the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), and their vulnerable, chronically-ill patients affords providers the unique opportunity to deliver critical assistance that could make this vulnerable population better prepared to meet their postdisaster health-related needs. This can be accomplished through education about preparedness and the provision of easier access to medical supplies. Disaster plans for those who are burdened with chronic conditions should meet their social needs in addition to their psychological and physical needs.Der-MartirosianC, RiopelleD, NaranjoD, YanoE, RubensteinL, DobalianA. Pre-earthquake burden of illness and postearthquake health and preparedness in veterans. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(3):1-7.

OBJECTIVE To compare three interventions to reduce diabetes distress (DD) and improve self-management among non–clinically depressed adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS In REDEEM, 392 adults with T2DM and DD were randomized to computer-assisted self-management (CASM), CASM plus DD-specific problem solving (CAPS), or a computer-administered minimal supportive intervention. Primary outcomes were Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) total, the Emotional Burden (EB) and Regimen Distress (RD) DDS subscales, and diet, exercise, and medication adherence. RESULTS Significant and clinically meaningful reductions in DD (DDS, EB, and RD) and self-management behaviors occurred in all three conditions (P < 0.001), with no significant between-group differences. There was, however, a significant group × baseline distress interaction (P < 0.02), in which patients with high baseline RD in the CAPS condition displayed significantly larger RD reductions than those in the other two conditions. RD generated the most distress and displayed the greatest distress reduction as a result of intervention. The pace of DD reduction varied by patient age: older patients demonstrated significant reductions in DD early in the intervention, whereas younger adults displayed similar reductions later. Reductions in DD were accompanied by significant improvements in healthy eating, physical activity, and medication adherence, although not by change in HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS DD is malleable and highly responsive to intervention. Interventions that enhance self-management also reduce DD significantly, but DD-specific interventions may be necessary for patients with high initial levels of DD. Future research should identify the minimal, most cost-effective interventions to reduce DD and improve self-management.

Patients managing type 1 diabetes have access to new technologies to assist in management. This manuscript has two aims: 1) to briefly review the literature on diabetes technology use and how this relates to psychological factors and 2) to present an example of human factors research using our data to examine psychological factors associated with technology use. Device/technology uptake and use has increased over the years and at present day is a common clinical practice. There are mixed results in terms of health and psychosocial outcomes, with specific subgroups doing better than others with technology. Our data demonstrated that patients have moderately elevated diabetes distress across differing types of technology used, from low-tech to high-tech options, possibly meaning that technology does not add or take away distress. In addition, users on multiple daily injections compared to all other technology groups have less positive attitudes about technology. Finally, we discuss implications for clinical practice and future research.

Objective : Closed loop automated insulin delivery systems have the potential to transform diabetes management. Partners and relationships will be increasingly affected by these innovations. We examine current understanding of the partner’s role in type 1 diabetes (T1D) management and technology, and provide an example of how to elicit partners’ perspectives in technology research. Research Design and Methods : We conducted a literature review and a small focus group with the partners of participants enrolled in a 5-day hybrid closed loop (HCL) clinical trial. Couples’ questionnaire ratings of diabetes-related distress and hypoglycemia concerns were described. Results : Partners play an integral and often helpful role in managing diabetes. They also report significant diabetes-related distress and fear of hypoglycemia, which have implications for relationships. Closed loop systems offer potential benefits such as hypoglycemia prevention and partners’ online access to glucose data (“remote monitoring”). However, disruptive alerts, technical glitches, maintenance tasks, device size, and other drawbacks may strain partners and relationships. A partner focus group elicited several novel themes. Partners gained valuable insights about T1D from remote monitoring and identified hypoglycemia prevention as a major benefit. For all partners, hypoglycemia worries decreased during system use. However, partners also cited vicarious frustrations with the system, concerns about remote monitoring disrupting couple communication, and needs for technology-specific partner education. Conclusion : Closed loop systems stand to affect partners and relationships. As researchers continue to design closed loop systems and devise their integration into standard clinical care, it will be vital to assess partner perspectives to increase satisfaction and success with this technology.

IMPORTANCE: There is a lack of agreement on what constitutes successful outcomes for the process of health care transition (HCT) among adolescent and young adults with special health care needs. OBJECTIVE: To present HCT outcomes identified by a Delphi process with an interdisciplinary group of participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A Delphi method involving 3 stages was deployed to refine a list of HCT outcomes. This 18-month study (from January 5, 2013, of stage 1 to July 3, 2014, of stage 3) included an initial literature search, expert interviews, and then 2 waves of a web-based survey. On this survey, 93 participants from outpatient, community-based, and primary care clinics rated the importance of the top HCT outcomes identified by the Delphi process. Analyses were performed from July 5, 2014, to December 5, 2014. EXPOSURES: Health care transition outcomes of adolescents and young adults with special health care needs. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Importance ratings of identified HCT outcomes rated on a Likert scale from 1 (not important) to 9 (very important). RESULTS: The 2 waves of surveys included 117 and 93 participants as the list of outcomes was refined. Transition outcomes were refined by the 3 waves of the Delphi process, with quality of life being the highest-rated outcome with broad agreement. The 10 final outcomes identified included individual outcomes (quality of life, understanding the characteristics of conditions and complications, knowledge of medication, self-management, adherence to medication, and understanding health insurance), health services outcomes (attending medical appointments, having a medical home, and avoidance of unnecessary hospitalization), and a social outcome (having a social network). Participants indicated that different outcomes were likely needed for individuals with cognitive disabilities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Quality of life is an important construct relevant to HCT. Future research should identify valid measures associated with each outcome and further explore the role that quality of life plays in the HCT process. Achieving consensus is a critical step toward the development of reliable and objective comparisons of HCT outcomes across clinical conditions and care delivery locations.

PURPOSE We wanted to identify risk factors associated with the development of major depressive disorder (MDD) among patients with type 2 diabetes over time. METHODS In a noninterventional study, 338 adult patients with type 2 diabetes and no MDD diagnosis at baseline were assessed 3 times during 18 months (9-month intervals) to ascertain predictors of MDD. We tested a model incorporating personal, behavioral, biologic, and psychosocial variables to identify predictors of MDD. Exploratory analyses tested whether current negative affect mediated the relationship between predictors and subsequent MDD. We also conducted a stratified analysis of moderate vs high negative affect to explore whether level of baseline negative affect mediated the relationship between specific predictors and MDD. RESULTS Prior MDD and negative affect predicted future development of MDD. In subpopulations stratified by moderate negative affect, negative life events, an elevated body mass index (BMI), prior MDD, and poor control of glycated hemoglobin (hemoglobin A1c) each predicted MDD. In subpopulations stratified by elevated negative affect, negative life events and poor control of hemoglobin A1c predicted MDD. Current negative affect partially mediated the relationship between prior MDD and subsequent MDD, as well as the relationship between negative life events and subsequent MDD. CONCLUSIONS Although negative affect at baseline was the primary predictor of subsequent MDD, when stratified by negative affect, negative life events, BMI, and poor control of hemoglobin A1c also predicted MDD. Thus, life stresses and patients’ disease-related concerns are important when understanding what predicts subsequent MDD. Addressing depressive symptoms and broader life context issues expands the scope of a potential intervention to reduce the risk of developing MDD in persons with type 2 diabetes.

Family bonding was examined among Hispanic adolescents whose fathers are illicit drug users to ascertain whether such adolescents maintain close affective family ties or alienate themselves from their families given their father's use of illicit drugs and referral to a drug screening and treatment program. It was hypothesized that high levels of paternal drug use would be associated with the youth's alienation from the family. In addition, it was postulated that the adolescent's endorsement of traditional cultural values and social responsibility would protect her or him against this effect in relation to family bonding. These hypotheses are based on prior research that suggests that youth bonding to prosocial institutions, such as family, school, church, and community organizations, can be "protective" against drug use. More specifically, our analyses examined the role of level of acculturation in middle school, family traditionalism, American orientation, Latino orientation, and social responsibility in predicting adolescents' family bonding. Results indicated that the father's level of marijuana and/or methamphetamine use was unrelated to youth family bonding. Additionally, Latino and American cultural orientations and level of acculturation in middle school were not associated with family bonding. By contrast, social responsibility (the youth's citizenship and responsibility to the community) and family traditionalism (endorsing conservative cultural values regarding the maintenance of family traditions and respect for elders and family) were significantly associated with family bonding. In other words, among children of Latino illicit drug users, the youth's conservative family values and a responsible attitude toward community traditions were dual factors related to family bonding, perhaps operating also as sources of "protection" against youth problem behaviors.