Search

Background The COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has spread in Italy since February 2020, inducing the government to call for lockdown of any activity, apart primary needs, during the months March–May 2020. During the lockdown, a reduction of admissions and hospitalizations for ischemic diseases was noticed. Purpose of this study was to observe if there has been the same reduction trend in Accident & Emergency (A&E) unit admissions also for obstetric-gynecological conditions. Methods Medical records and electronic clinical databases were searched for all patients who were admitted to the obstetric A&E department or hospitalized at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit of University hospital of Naples Federico II, during the quarter March–May in the years 2019 and 2020. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) of monthly admission to the obstetric A&E department and hospitalization of the year 2020 was compared with that of the year 2019, using the unpaired T test with α error set to 0.05 and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Results Admissions were 1483 in the year 2020 and 1786 in 2019. Of total, 1225 (37.5%) women were hospitalized: 583 in the year 2020, 642 in 2019. Mean ± SD of patients monthly admitted to our obstetric A&E department was 494 ± 33.7 in the year 2020, and 595.3 ± 30.9 in 2019, with a mean difference of − 101.3 (95% CI − 103.5 to − 99.1; p p Conclusion A significant decrease in the mean of monthly admissions and hospitalizations during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared to the previous year was found also for obstetric–gynecological conditions. Further studies are necessary to assess COVID-19 impact and to take the most appropriate countermeasures.

Objective: Multiple factors are thought to affect a woman's sensation of pain during the process of labor. Birthing balls are round exercise balls upon which a woman sits during labor and performs different movements such as rocking back and forth and pelvic rotation. Midwives and nurses have been using birthing balls (also known as Swiss balls) to increase maternal comfort, widen the pelvic outlet, and facilitate progression of labor for women laboring without an epidural. Therefore, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials is to assess whether the use of the birthing ball in labor decreases maternal pain during labor. Data sources: Research was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrial.gov, OVID and Cochrane Library as electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials were identified using the following search strategy: "birthing ball" OR "birth ball" OR "swiss ball" OR "exercise ball" AND labor from the inception of each database to June 2019. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied. Study eligibility criteria: Selection criteria included randomized trials of pregnant women with a singleton, cephalic fetus who were randomized to either birthing ball or control group (i.e. no birthing ball) for use in labor. Study appraisal and synthesis methods: Seven trials with 533 pregnant women were included. 287 (53.8%) were randomized to the intervention group (birthing ball) and 246 (46.2%) were randomized to the control group (no birthing ball). All analyses were done using an intention-to-treat approach, evaluating women according to the treatment group to which they were randomly allocated in the original trials. The primary outcome was labor pain in the first stage of labor. The summary measures were reported as summary relative risk (RR) or as summary mean difference (MD) with 95% of confidence interval (CI) using the random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: Labor pain significantly decreased by 1.70 points in the birthing ball group compared to the control group (MD -1.70 points; 95% CI -2.20 to -1.20). Use of the birthing ball versus no birthing ball did not result in a significant difference in incidence of spontaneous vaginal delivery, operative vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery, or perineal lacerations. Conclusion: The birthing ball is an effective method of pain reduction during labor for women laboring without an epidural.

INTRODUCTION: The lowest incidence of perinatal morbidity and mortality occurs around 39-40 weeks. Therefore, some have advocated induction of uncomplicated singleton gestations once they reach full-term. The aim of the study was to evaluate the risk of cesarean delivery, and any maternal and perinatal effects of a policy of induction of labor in women with full-term uncomplicated singleton gestations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed an electronic search from inception of each database to August 2018. All results were then limited to randomized trial. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied. Inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials of asymptomatic women with uncomplicated, singleton gestations at full-term (ie, between 39+0 and 40+6 weeks) who were randomized to either planned induction of labor or control (ie, expectant management). Only trials on asymptomatic singleton gestations without premature rupture of membranes or any other indications for induction evaluating the effectiveness of planned induction of labor in full-term singleton gestations were included. The primary outcome was the incidence of cesarean delivery. RESULTS: Seven randomized clinical trials, including 7598 participants were analyzed. Three studies enrolled only women with favorable cervix, defined as a Bishop score of ≥5 in nulliparous women or ≥4 in multiparous women. One trial included only women aged 35 years or older. Women randomized to the planned induction of labor, received scheduled induction usually at 39+0 to 39+6 weeks of gestation, whereas women in the control group received expectant management usually until 41-42 weeks of gestation, or earlier if medically indicated. Methods of induction usually included cervical ripening, with either misoprostol or Foley catheter, in conjunction with or followed by oxytocin for women with unfavorable cervix, and oxytocin and artificial rupture of membranes for those with favorable cervix. Five trials also used artificial rupture of membranes as a method for induction. Uncomplicated full-term singleton gestations that were randomized to receive induction of labor had similar incidence of cesarean delivery compared with controls (18.6% vs 21.4%; relative risk 0.96, 95% CI 0.78-1.19). Regarding neonatal outcomes, induction of labor at full-term was associated with a significantly lower rate of meconium-stained amniotic fluid (4.0% vs 13.5%; relative risk 0.32, 95% CI 0.18-0.57), and lower mean birthweight (mean difference -98.96 g, 95% CI -126.29 to -71.63) compared with the control group. There were no between-group differences in other adverse neonatal outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Induction of labor at about 39 weeks is not associated with increased risk of cesarean delivery.

Prenatal carrier screening has expanded to include a large number of genes offered to all couples considering pregnancy or with an ongoing pregnancy. Expanded carrier screening refers to identification of carriers of single-gene disorders outside of traditional screening guidelines. Expanded carrier screening panels include numerous autosomal recessive and X-linked genetic conditions, including those with a very low carrier frequency, as well as those with mild or incompletely penetrant phenotype. Therefore, the clinical utility of these panels is still subject of debate. Priority should be given to carrier screening panels that include a comprehensive set of severe childhood-onset disorders. Psychosocial support and genetic couseling should be available prior to screening and for the return of positive results. Systems are needed to reduce the risk of misinterpreting results. Finally, attention should be paid on the impact of expanded carrier screening on health care organizations and burden of cost.