Search

Background Cardiac device procedures require tissue dissection to free existing device lead(s). Common techniques include blunt dissection, standard electrocautery, and low-temperature electrocautery (PlasmaBlade, Medtronic); however, data on the type of electrosurgical tool used and the development of procedure- or lead-related adverse events are limited. Objective The purpose of this study was to determine whether standard or low-temperature electrocautery impacts the development of an adverse event. Methods We evaluated patients enrolled in WRAP-IT (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic EnveloPe Infection PrevenTion Trial) undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) revision, upgrade, or replacement. All adverse events were adjudicated by an independent physician committee. Data were analyzed using Cox proportional hazard regression modeling. Results In total, 5641 patients underwent device revision/upgrade/replacement. Electrocautery was used in 5205 patients (92.3%) (mean age 70.6 ± 12.7 years; 28.8% female), and low-temperature electrocautery was used in 1866 patients (35.9%). Compared to standard electrocautery, low-temperature electrocautery was associated with a 23% reduction in the incidence of a procedure- or lead-related adverse event through 3 years of follow up (hazard ratio [HR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65–0.91; P = .002). After controlling for the number of active leads, degree of capsulectomy, degree of lead dissection, and renal dysfunction, low-temperature electrocautery was associated with a 32% lower risk of lead-related adverse events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.52–0.89; P = .004). These effects were consistent across a spectrum of lead-related adverse event types. Conclusion This study represents one of the largest assessments of electrocautery use in patients undergoing CIED revision, upgrade, or replacement procedures. Compared to standard electrocautery, low-temperature electrocautery significantly reduces adverse effects from these procedures.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text., Background: In the WRAP-IT trial (Worldwide Randomized Antibiotic Envelope Infection Prevention), adjunctive use of an absorbable antibacterial envelope resulted in a 40% reduction of major cardiac implantable electronic device infection without increased risk of complication in 6983 patients undergoing cardiac implantable electronic device revision, replacement, upgrade, or initial cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator implant. There is limited information on the cost-effectiveness of this strategy. As a prespecified objective, we evaluated antibacterial envelope cost-effectiveness compared with standard-of-care infection prevention strategies in the US healthcare system. Methods: A decision tree model was used to compare costs and outcomes of antibacterial envelope (TYRX) use adjunctive to standard-of-care infection prevention versus standard-of-care alone over a lifelong time horizon. The analysis was performed from an integrated payer-provider network perspective. Infection rates, antibacterial envelope effectiveness, infection treatment costs and patterns, infection-related mortality, and utility estimates were obtained from the WRAP-IT trial. Life expectancy and long-term costs associated with device replacement, follow-up, and healthcare utilization were sourced from the literature. Costs and quality-adjusted life years were discounted at 3%. An upper willingness-to-pay threshold of $150 000 per quality-adjusted life year was used to determine cost-effectiveness, in alignment with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association practice guidelines and as supported by the World Health Organization and contemporary literature. Results: The base case incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the antibacterial envelope compared with standard-of-care was $112 603/quality-adjusted life year. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio remained lower than the willingness-to-pay threshold in 74% of iterations in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis and was most sensitive to the following model inputs: infection-related mortality, life expectancy, and infection cost. Conclusions: The absorbable antibacterial envelope was associated with a cost-effectiveness ratio below contemporary benchmarks in the WRAP-IT patient population, suggesting that the envelope provides value for the US healthcare system by reducing the incidence of cardiac implantable electronic device infection. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02277990.

Objectives This study sought to examine the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted lead extraction and the indications, outcomes, and risk factors in a large series of consecutive patients. Background The need for lead extraction has been increasing in direct relationship to the increased numbers of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices. Methods Consecutive patients undergoing transvenous laser-assisted lead extraction at 13 centers were included. Results Between January 2004 and December 2007, 1,449 consecutive patients underwent laser-assisted lead extraction of 2,405 leads (20 to 270 procedures/site). Median implantation duration was 82.1 months (0.4 to 356.8 months). Leads were completely removed 96.5% of the time, with a 97.7% clinical success rate whereby clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal were achieved. Failure to achieve clinical success was associated with body mass index 10 years and when performed in low volume centers. Major adverse events in 20 patients were directly related to the procedure (1.4%) including 4 deaths (0.28%). Major adverse effects were associated with patients with a body mass index Conclusions Lead extraction employing laser sheaths is highly successful with a low procedural complication rate. Total mortality is substantially increased with pocket infections or device-related endocarditis, particularly in the setting of diabetes, renal insufficiency, or body mass index

Patients with severe congestive heart failure (CHF) are at increased risk for atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Amiodarone is generally well tolerated by this population and has a low proarrhythmic potential. Because of its peculiar kinetics, amiodarone requires a prolonged loading period, necessitating lengthy hospitalizations in a monitored setting. This study was planned prospectively to assess the electrophysiologic effects of an abbreviated high-dose oral load of amiodarone in patients with severe CHF and known or suspected life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Fifteen patients with stable CHF and known or suspected life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias underwent baseline electrophysiologic study. The study was repeated after administration of oral amiodarone, 50 mg/kg/day for 2 days in 8 divided doses (mean dose 6.9 +/- 0.4 g). After amiodarone administration, there was prolongation in virtually all conduction times and refractory periods. The prolongation of refractoriness was most pronounced in the atrium. Ventricular effective refractory periods demonstrated reverse frequency dependence. We conclude that a brief high-dose oral load of amiodarone is well tolerated by patients with CHF. It has marked and diffuse electrophysiologic actions suggestive of class I and III effects in addition to antiadrenergic and calcium blocking action. These effects are especially pronounced in the atrium.

This study sought to examine the safety and efficacy of laser-assisted lead extraction and the indications, outcomes, and risk factors in a large series of consecutive patients.The need for lead extraction has been increasing in direct relationship to the increased numbers of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices.Consecutive patients undergoing transvenous laser-assisted lead extraction at 13 centers were included.Between January 2004 and December 2007, 1,449 consecutive patients underwent laser-assisted lead extraction of 2,405 leads (20 to 270 procedures/site). Median implantation duration was 82.1 months (0.4 to 356.8 months). Leads were completely removed 96.5% of the time, with a 97.7% clinical success rate whereby clinical goals associated with the indication for lead removal were achieved. Failure to achieve clinical success was associated with body mass index25 kg/m(2) and low extraction volume centers. Procedural failure was higher in leads implanted for10 years and when performed in low volume centers. Major adverse events in 20 patients were directly related to the procedure (1.4%) including 4 deaths (0.28%). Major adverse effects were associated with patients with a body mass index25 kg/m(2). Overall all-cause in-hospital mortality was 1.86%; 4.3% when associated with endocarditis, 7.9% when associated with endocarditis and diabetes, and 12.4% when associated with endocarditis and creatinineor =2.0. Indicators of all-cause in-hospital mortality were pocket infections, device-related endocarditis, diabetes, and creatinineor =2.0.Lead extraction employing laser sheaths is highly successful with a low procedural complication rate. Total mortality is substantially increased with pocket infections or device-related endocarditis, particularly in the setting of diabetes, renal insufficiency, or body mass index25 kg/m(2). Centers with smaller case volumes tended to have a lower rate of successful extraction.

In the pathogenesis of mycotic infections, adherence of the microbes to surface structures prior to invasion appears to be the initial and essential step in a susceptible host. Adherence and inhibition of adherence of Candida albicans to rabbit corneal surface was investigated in vitro by light and scanning electron microscopic examinations. The results indicate that blastospores of Candida albicans rarely bind to intact corneal epithelium, but consistently adhere to stroma denuded of epithelium. Such adherence was inhibited by concanavalin A. With its strong affinity for the yeast cell wall carbohydrate mannan, concanavalin A may block the site of attachment of yeast cells to the corneal surface.