Search

Background Pain predominant multisymptom illness (pain-CMI) refers to symptom-based conditions where pain is a primary symptom. There is initial evidence that health coaching may be efficacious in treating pain-CMI because it can be tailored to the veteran’s goals and emphasizes long-term behavior change, which may indirectly impact the maintaining factors of pain-CMI (e.g., catastrophizing, poor pain control, and limited activity). This paper describes the study protocol and rationale of a randomized controlled trial that will compare the efficacy of remote-delivered health coaching in reducing disability and pain impairment for veterans with pain-CMI to remote-delivered supportive psychotherapy. Methods This randomized controlled trial will consist of two treatment arms: remote-delivered health coaching and remote-delivered supportive psychotherapy, the active control. Each treatment condition will consist of twelve, weekly one-on-one meetings with a study provider. In addition to the baseline assessment, participants will also complete 6-week (mid-treatment), 12-week (post-treatment), and 24-week (follow-up) assessments that consist of questionnaires that can be completed remotely. The primary aims for this study are to determine whether health coaching reduces disability and pain impairment as compared to supportive psychotherapy. We will also examine whether health coaching reduces physical symptoms, catastrophizing, limiting activity, and increasing pain control as compared to supportive psychotherapy. Discussion This study will contribute to the existing literature on pain-CMI and report the effectiveness of a novel, remote-delivered behavioral intervention.

ImportanceFew evidence-based treatments are available for Gulf War illness (GWI). Behavioral treatments that target factors known to maintain the disability from GWI, such as problem-solving impairment, may be beneficial. Problem-solving treatment (PST) targets problem-solving impairment and is an evidence-based treatment for other conditions.ObjectiveTo examine the efficacy of PST to reduce disability, problem-solving impairment, and physical symptoms in GWI.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in the US Department of Veterans Affairs compared PST with health education in a volunteer sample of 511 Gulf War veterans with GWI and disability (January 1, 2015, to September 1, 2019); outcomes were assessed at 12 weeks and 6 months. Statistical analysis was conducted between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2020.InterventionsProblem-solving treatment taught skills to improve problem-solving. Health education provided didactic health information. Both were delivered by telephone weekly for 12 weeks.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was reduction from baseline to 12 weeks in self-report of disability (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule). Secondary outcomes were reductions in self-report of problem-solving impairment and objective problem-solving. Exploratory outcomes were reductions in pain, pain disability, and fatigue.ResultsA total of 268 veterans (mean [SD] age, 52.9 [7.3] years; 88.4% male; 66.8% White) were randomized to PST (n = 135) or health education (n = 133). Most participants completed all 12 sessions of PST (114 of 135 [84.4%]) and health education (120 of 133 [90.2%]). No difference was found between groups in reductions in disability at the end of treatment. Results suggested that PST reduced problem-solving impairment (moderate effect, 0.42; P = .01) and disability at 6 months (moderate effect, 0.39; P = .06) compared with health education.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this randomized clinical trial of the efficacy of PST for GWI, no difference was found between groups in reduction in disability at 12 weeks. Problem-solving treatment had high adherence and reduced problem-solving impairment and potentially reduced disability at 6 months compared with health education. These findings should be confirmed in future studies.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02161133

A regionalization procedure is presented and used to predict probable flooding in four ungauged coastal river basins of El Salvador: Paz, Jiboa, Grande de San Miguel, and Goascoran. The flood-prediction problem is sequentially solved for two regions: upstream mountains and downstream alluvial plains. In the upstream mountains, a set of rainfall-runoff parameter values and recurrent peak-flow discharge hydrographs are simultaneously estimated for 20 tributary-basin models. Application of dissimilarity equations among tributary basins (soft prior information) permitted development of a parsimonious parameter structure subject to information content in the recurrent peak-flow discharge values derived using regression equations based on measurements recorded outside the ungauged study basins. The estimated joint set of parameter values formed the basis from which probable minimum and maximum peak-flow discharge limits were then estimated revealing that prediction uncertainty increases with basin size. In the ...