Search

Currently, there are no approved medications to treat cocaine addiction. In this context, d-amphetamine maintenance therapy is a promising pharmacological strategy to reduce cocaine use. In both male rats and human cocaine users, d-amphetamine treatment reduces cocaine taking and seeking. However, this has not been examined systematically in female animals, even though cocaine addiction afflicts both women and men, and the sexes can differ in their response to cocaine. Here, we determined how d-amphetamine maintenance therapy during cocaine self-administration influences cocaine use in female rats. In experiment 1, two groups of female rats received 14 intermittent access (IntA) cocaine self-administration sessions. One group received concomitant d-amphetamine maintenance treatment (COC + A rats; 5 mg/kg/day, via minipump), the other group did not (COC rats). After discontinuing d-amphetamine treatment, we measured responding for cocaine under a progressive ratio schedule, responding under extinction and cocaine-primed reinstatement of drug seeking. In experiment 2, we assessed the effects of d-amphetamine maintenance on these measures in already cocaine-experienced rats. To this end, rats first received 14 IntA cocaine self-administration sessions without d-amphetamine. They then received 14 more sessions now either with (COC/COC + A rats) or without (COC/COC rats) concomitant d-amphetamine treatment. In both experiments, d-amphetamine treatment did not influence cocaine-primed reinstatement of cocaine seeking. However, after d-amphetamine treatment, rats responded less for cocaine both under progressive ratio and extinction conditions. Thus, d-amphetamine treatment can both prevent and reverse increases in the motivation to take and seek cocaine in female animals.

The dopamine (DA) hypothesis postulates hyperactivity of subcortical DA transmission and hypoactivity of cortical DA in schizophrenia (SCH). Positron emission tomography provides the ability to assess this hypothesis in humans. However, no studies have examined the relationship between cortical DA and striatal DA in this illness.Dsub2/3/subreceptor radiotracer [sup11/supC]FLB457 BPsubND/sub(binding potential relative to nondisplaceable uptake) was measured in 14 off-medication subjects with SCH and 14 healthy control (HC) subjects at baseline and after the administration of 0.5 mg/kg oral d-amphetamine. The amphetamine-induced change in BPsubND/sub(ΔBPsubND/sub) was calculated as the difference between BPsubND/subin the postamphetamine condition and BPsubND/subin the baseline condition and expressed as a percentage of BPsubND/subat baseline. DA release in the striatum using the radiotracer [sup11/supC]NPA was also measured in these subjects.[sup11/supC]FLB457 ΔBPsubND/subwas greater in the HC group compared with the SCH group (Fsub1,26/sub = 5.7; p = .02) with significant differences in [sup11/supC]FLB457 ΔBPsubND/subseen across cortical brain regions. Only in the SCH group was a significant negative correlation observed between [sup11/supC]FLB457 ΔBPsubND/subin the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and [sup11/supC]NPA ΔBPsubND/subin the dorsal caudate (r = -0.71, p = .005).Subjects with SCH demonstrated deficits of DA release in cortical brain regions relative to HC subjects. Examining both cortical and striatal DA release in the same subjects demonstrated an inverse relationship between cortical DA release and striatal DA release in SCH not present in HC subjects, providing support for the current DA hypothesis of SCH.

Recent advances in diagnostic research identified that individuals with higher impulsivity and sensation-seeking scores tend to report more positive subjective responses to stimulant drugs such as amphetamine. The current exploratory study hypothesized that differences in underlying mesocorticolimbic circuitry may mediate the relationship between personality and responses to stimulants due to its previously established implication in reward processes as well as the overlap between its dopaminergic projections and the pharmacodynamics of many stimulants. Forty participants (20 female) were recruited with relatively high- and low-impulsivity and sensation-seeking scores as defined by the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (Form IIIR; Zuckerman, Kuhlman, Joireman, Teta, & Kraft, 1993) for a double-blind, placebo-controlled, intranasal amphetamine administration study conducted within an MRI scanner. Active state seed-to-voxel connectivity analyses assessed the effects of amphetamine, personality, subjective responses to amphetamine, and their interactions with mesocorticolimbic seeds on data collected during monetary incentive delay and go/no-go task performance. Results indicated that amphetamine administration largely disrupted brain activity as evidenced by connectivity values shifting toward no correlation among brain stem, striatal, and frontal cortex regions. Additionally, associations of impulsivity and connectivity between ventral tegmental and medial orbitofrontal as well as lateral orbitofrontal and putamen regions were inverted from negative to positive during the placebo and amphetamine conditions, respectively. Personality was unrelated to subjective responses to amphetamine. Results are interpreted as providing evidence of underlying differences in mesocorticolimbic circuitry being a potential target for requisite diagnostic and treatment strategies implicated with stimulant use disorders, but further research is needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

The poor translatability between preclinical and clinical drug trials has limited pro-cognitive therapeutic development. Future pro-cognitive drug trials should use translatable cross-species cognitive tasks with biomarkers (1) relevant to specific cognitive constructs, and (2) sensitive to drug treatment. Here, we used a difficulty-modulated variant of a cross-species cognitive control task with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) to identify neurophysiological biomarkers sensitive to the pro-cognitive effects of dextroamphetamine (d-amp) (10 or 20 mg) in healthy adults (n = 23), in a randomized, placebo-controlled, counterbalanced, double blind, within-subject study, conducted across three test days each separated by one week. D-amp boosted d-prime, sped reaction time, and increased frontal P3a amplitude to non-target correct rejections independent of task difficulty. Task difficulty did however, moderate d-amp effects on EEG during target performance. D-amp suppressed frontal theta power during easy target responses which negatively correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate while d-amp-induced changes in P3b amplitude during hard target trials strongly correlated with drug-induced improvement in hit rate. In summary, d-amp affected both behavioral and neurophysiological measures of cognitive control elements. Under low-demand, d-amp diminished cognitive control by suppressing theta, yet under high-demand it boosted control in concert with higher P3b amplitudes. These findings thus appear to reflect a gain-sharpening effect of d-amp: during high-demand processes were boosted while during low-demand processes were neglected. Future studies will use these neurophysiological measures of cognitive control as biomarkers to predict d-amp sensitivity in people with cognitive control deficits, including schizophrenia.

The association between central nervous (CNS) stimulants used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) has received little attention to date. Our aim was to map the existing literature on aetiopathogenesis, clinical presentation and management of peripheral vasculopathy, with a focus on RP, secondary to drug therapy for ADHD. We searched the PubMed® database (01/11/1951 to 01/08/2020) and included articles written in English, which focussed on CNS stimulants used to treat ADHD and RP. The search identified 150 articles 9 of which were eligible for inclusion (70 patients). The majority of studies (n = 6) related to children or adolescents; however, adult cases were also identified. Peripheral vascular manifestations included attacks of RP (new and worsening) and cold sensitivity (acrocyanosis and perniosis). Irreversible ischaemic complications including digital autoamputation and lower limb critical digital ischaemia have also been reported. The implicated causative CNS stimulants were Methylphenidate (n = 5), Dextroamphetamine (n = 4), Atomoxetine (n = 2), and Lisdexamphetamine (n = 2). Complete resolution of RP symptoms was observed in half (n = 5) of studies upon drug cessation. Other therapeutic strategies have included dose reduction and switching to an alternative drug therapy. A potential autoimmune association has also been postulated including drug-induced autoimmunity and new cases of systemic sclerosis which have been potentially attributed to treatment. Future research is required to understand the association between CNS stimulant drug therapies for ADHD and peripheral vascular manifestations, including RP.

Schizophrenia pathophysiology has been associated with dopaminergic hyperactivity, NMDA receptor hypofunction, and redox dysregulation. Most behavioral assays and animal models to study this condition were developed in rodents, leaving room for species-specific biases that could be avoided by cross-species approaches. As MK-801 and amphetamine are largely used in mice and rats to mimic schizophrenia features, this study aimed to compare the effects of these drugs in several zebrafish (Danio rerio) behavioral assays. Male and female adult zebrafish were exposed to MK-801 (1, 5, and 10 μM) or amphetamine (0.625, 2.5, and 10 mg/L) and observed in paradigms of locomotor activity and social behavior. Oxidative parameters were quantified in brain tissue. Our results demonstrate that MK-801 disrupted social interaction, an effect that resembles the negative symptoms of schizophrenia. It also altered locomotion in a context-dependent manner, with hyperactivity when fish were tested in the presence of social cues and hypoactivity when tested alone. On the other hand, exposure to amphetamine was devoid of effects on locomotion and social behavior, while it increased lipid peroxidation in the brain. Key outcomes induced by MK-801 in rodents, such as social interaction deficit and locomotor alterations, were replicated in zebrafish, corroborating previous studies and reinforcing the use of zebrafish to study schizophrenia-related endophenotypes. More studies are necessary to assess the predictive validity of preclinical paradigms with this species and ultimately optimize the screening of potential novel treatments.

There has been a lack of research on the third area of impairment noted in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition-"occupational functioning." It is important to understand the impact of common treatments for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in occupational settings. Twenty individuals with ADHD between ages 16 and 25 participated in a double-blind, placebo controlled evaluation of 40 mg lisdexamfetamine dimesylate in a setting designed to approximate a restaurant workplace with associated, simulated food delivery. Outcome measures included ratings of performance, as well as behavioral productivity. Results indicated that participants completed more workplace tasks when on medication, relative to placebo. Ratings of job application quality, job interview performance, and delivery outcomes were not significantly different on medication versus placebo. These results suggest positive effects of medication in a workplace environment, but also a need for study of additional interventions to support workplace-related behavior and functioning. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Misuse of dextroamphetamine occurs in work and recreational contexts. While acute drug effects broadly predict abuse liability, few studies have considered the relationship between acute effects and context. This study examined how individual differences in acute effects of dextroamphetamine relate to desire to take dextroamphetamine again in different contexts. This secondary analysis used data from healthy adults with no history of moderate-to-severe substance use disorder, who received oral doses of placebo and dextroamphetamine (10 and 20 mg) over 3 sessions under double-blind, randomized conditions. Subjects rated subjective effects and completed reward-related behavioral tasks. Subjects rated their desire to take dextroamphetamine again in hypothetical work and recreational contexts. Multilevel models examined within-subjects change scores (10 mg-placebo; 20 mg-placebo) to determine how subjective effects and behavioral outcomes predicted desire to take dextroamphetamine again for work versus recreation. Subjects reported more desire to take 20 mg dextroamphetamine again for work than for recreation. At 20 mg, there was an interaction between context and liking/wanting, such that liking/wanting predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine for work only. There was also an interaction at 20 mg between context and psychomotor speed, such that psychomotor speed predicted interest in using dextroamphetamine for recreation only. We found that positive subjective effects predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine again for work, while increased motor effects predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine recreationally. Hedonic effects may be perceived as advantageous when working, while increased physical energy may be preferred during recreation, suggesting that context of intended use is important when examining abuse liability.

Dopamine D2/3 receptor agonists are less likely to trigger dyskinesias than L-dopa while still offering relief from the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, these drugs can cause serious impulse control problems and gambling disorders. Adjunctive therapies capable of blocking these side effects without impacting the antiparkinsonian effect would be clinically useful. G-protein-coupled receptor 52 (GPR52) is an orphan Gs-protein-coupled receptor that is coexpressed with striatal D₂ receptors. Activating GPR52 attenuates behaviors associated with increased striatal dopamine release without altering basal function. Iatrogenic gambling disorder may be mediated, at least partly, by striatal dopamine signaling. We therefore investigated whether 2 potent small-molecule GPR52 agonists (BD442618, BD502657) could block the increase in preference for uncertain outcomes caused by acute d-amphetamine and chronic ropinirole, without altering baseline choice patterns. In the rat betting task (rBT), subjects choose between a guaranteed reward (the "wager") versus the 50:50 chance of double the wager or nothing. Although wager size varies across trial blocks, both options are constantly matched for expected value. The effects of BD442618 on the rBT were acutely assessed alone or in combination with d-amphetamine and subsequently in combination with chronic ropinirole. The latter experiment was then repeated with BD502657. BD442618 did not alter baseline decision making but attenuated the increase in preference for uncertainty caused by both acute amphetamine and chronic ropinirole administration. Similarly, BD502657 abrogated chronic ropinirole's effects. These data provide the first evidence that GPR52 agonists may be useful in treating iatrogenic gambling disorder or other conditions hallmarked by hyperdopaminergic states. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Immune-inflammatory mechanisms are involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder. Tetracyclines present neuroprotective actions based on their anti-inflammatory and microglia suppressant effects. Doxycycline (DOXY) is a tetracycline that demonstrates a better usage profile with protective actions against inflammation and CNS injury. Here, we investigated the effects of DOXY against behavioral, neuroinflammatory, and pro-oxidative changes induced by the d-amphetamine mania model. Adult mice were given d-amphetamine 2.0 mg/kg or saline for 14 days. Between days 8 and 14, received lithium, DOXY (25 or 50 mg/kg), or their combination (lithium+DOXY) on both doses. We collected the brain areas prefrontal cortex (PFC), hippocampus, and amygdala to evaluate inflammatory and oxidative alterations. D-amphetamine induced hyperlocomotion and impairment in recognition and working memory. Lithium reversed hyperlocomotion but could not restore cognitive alterations. DOXY alone (at both doses) or combined with lithium reversed d-amphetamine-induced cognitive changes. DOXY, better than lithium, reversed the d-amphetamine-induced rise in TNFα, MPO, and lipid peroxidation. DOXY reduced the hippocampal expression of Iba1 (a marker of microglial activation), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and nitrite. Combined with lithium, DOXY increased the phosphorylated (inactivated) form of GSK3β (Ser9). Therefore, DOXY alone or combined with lithium reversed cognitive impairment and neuroinflammation induced by the mice's d-amphetamine model. This study points to DOXY as a promising adjunctive tool for bipolar disorder treatment focused on cognition and neuroimmune changes. Our data provide the first rationale for clinical trials investigating DOXY therapeutic actions in bipolar disorder mania.

Deaths attributable to psychostimulants with abuse potential have increased in the United States (US) in recent years. Methamphetamine use, in particular, has risen sharply. We evaluated the correlation between amphetamine- and methamphetamine-related case exposures reported to the Michigan Poison Center (MiPC) coinciding with psychostimulant age-adjusted mortality rates from the Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS).We compared amphetamine and methamphetamine exposures reported to the MiPC from 2012 to 2018, queried from ToxSentryPsychostimulant deaths reported by MDHHS increased from 17 to 165 between 2012 and 2018. The average age-adjusted rate of psychostimulant-involved overdose deaths per 100,000 state residents rose from 0.2 to 1.8. Linear regression of MiPC amphetamine exposure rates with state health department-reported age-adjusted psychostimulant mortality rates yielded a slope of 1.93, SE 0.5,Psychostimulant use and associated deaths in the US are increasing, representing an evolving public health threat. Michigan demonstrates consistency with national trends and data from the MiPC correlates strongly with state-reported age-adjusted psychostimulant mortality rates. Strengthening collaboration between poison centers and state health departments is critical for detection and mitigation efforts and can thereby inform resource allocation.

BackgroundTo evaluate the relative bioavailability of a single dose of amphetamine extended-release oral suspension (AMPH EROS) compared with a single dose of extended-release mixed amphetamine salts (ER MAS) in healthy, fasted adult subjects.MethodsThe study population consisted of healthy adult volunteers. The study drug used in this study was 7.5 mL of 2.5 mg/mL AMPH EROS equivalent to 18.8 mg of amphetamine base administered after an overnight fast of at least 10 hours. AMPH EROS comprises a 3.2:1 enantiomeric ratio of d-amphetamine to l-amphetamine. The reference product was one 30 mg ER MAS capsule (equivalent to 18.8 mg of amphetamine base). Relative bioavailability between the products was determined by a statistical comparison of the area under the curve and maximum concentration (Cmax) for d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine. PK (PK) blood samples were collected prior to dosing (0-hour) and at 1, 2, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, 14, 16, 24, 36, 48, and 60 hours after drug administration, totaling 20 samples in each period.ResultsThe mean subject age was 35.0 (standard deviation ±8) years, and the overall study population comprised 19 (63.3%) males and 11 (36.7%) females. The contrasts for geometric mean ratios for all assessed PK parameters (for both l- and d-amphetamine) between the test article AMPH EROS and reference product ER MAS fell within the prescribed 80% to 125% limits.ConclusionsThe overall PK profile of single-dose AMPH EROS 7.5 mL was found to be comparable with a single dose of oral ER MAS 30 mg.

Stimulant use disorders present an enduring public health concern. Chronic stimulant use is associated with a range of health problems, with notable increases in stimulant overdose that disproportionately affect marginalized populations. With these persistent problems, it is important to understand the behavioral and pharmacological factors that contribute to stimulant use in humans. The purpose of this chapter is to provide an update and narrative review on recent human laboratory research that has evaluated the behavioral pharmacology of stimulant drugs. We focus on two prototypic stimulants: cocaine as a prototype monoamine reuptake inhibitor and d-amphetamine as a prototype monoamine releaser. As such, placebo controlled human laboratory studies that involved administration of doses of cocaine or d-amphetamine and were published in peer reviewed journals within the last 10 years (i.e., since 2011) are reviewed. Primary outcomes from these studies are subjective effects, reinforcing effects, cognitive/behavioral effects, and discriminative stimulus effects. Both cocaine and d-amphetamine produce classical stimulant-like behavioral effects (e.g., increase positive subjective effects, function as reinforcers), but there are notable gaps in the literature including understanding sex differences in response to stimulant drugs, cognitive-behavioral effects of stimulants, and influence of use history (e.g., relatively drug naïve vs drug experienced) on stimulant effects.

Amphetamine is frequently detected in forensic toxicological cases. Differentiating between the two isomers of amphetamine (d-amphetamine and l-amphetamine) and determining their relative proportion are fundamental to correctly interpret the results of toxicological analyses. The aim of this study was to examine the profile of amphetamine as well as storage stability of the isomers in authentic samples from patients chronically treated with lisdexamfetamine (LDX), the most prescribed medical amphetamine product in Sweden. Blood and urine samples were collected from 18 patients. The samples were analyzed with an achiral (racemate) method for quantification of amphetamine and with a chiral method to determine the proportion of each isomer of amphetamine. The median daily dose of LDX was 40 mg (range, 20–70 mg). The median amphetamine concentration was 0.06 µg/g (range, 0.02–0.15 µg/g) in blood and 6 µg/mL (range, 1–22 µg/mL) in urine. Only d-amphetamine was found in the blood and urine samples from the included patients. Furthermore, no formation of l-amphetamine occurred during the storage for 3 months at 4°C, 9 months at −20°C and three freeze–thaw cycles. The results from this study may be helpful in the interpretation of whether the source of identified amphetamine in biological samples is from LDX drug intake or not.

ADHD causes significant distress and functional impairment in multiple domains of daily life. Therefore, diagnosis and treatment are important to improve the quality of life of people. The pharmacotherapy for ADHD is well established but needs systematic evaluation in Intellectual Disability (ID) populations.This paper reviews the ADHD pharmacological treatment in people with ID using the PRISMA guidance for scoping reviews to help identify the nature and strength of evidence.In the last 20 years, seven randomized controlled trials have evaluated pharmacotherapies for ADHD in people with ID; five looking at methylphenidate. Generally, studies were underpowered; all but two had less than 25 participants. Of the two larger trials one was single blinded and therefore open to bias. Only two used a parallel-group method, the remainder were mostly short crossover trials; not ideal when measuring behavioral and psychological parameters which are long standing. The remaining evidence is made up of observational studies. Methylphenidate and atomoxetine, particularly at higher doses, have shown clear benefits in people with ID. Most people with ID tolerated ADHD medications well. Benefits were seen in behavioral and/or cognitive domains. The evidence base is limited, though promising, for dexamfetamine, clonidine, and guanfacine.

Objective: To investigate the effectiveness of stimulants in patients with depression, by using naturalistic outcome measures, such as psychiatric admissions, psychiatric bed-days and incidents of intentional self-harm or suicide attempts. Methods: Via linkage of the Danish nationwide health registers, we identified all patients with a diagnosis of depression initiating stimulants, including methylphenidate, modafinil, amphetamine, dexamphetamine or lisdexamphetamine, from 1995 to 2012. We used a mirror-image model to test whether redemption of a stimulant prescription was associated with a reduction in psychiatric admissions, inpatient days and incidents of intentional self-harm or suicide attempts. Specifically, the number of these outcomes in the 2 years leading up to redemption of a stimulant prescription was compared to the two subsequent years. Similar outcomes were used in a reverse mirror-image model to investigate the effect of stimulant termination. Results: A total of 3354, 935 and 105 patients diagnosed with depression redeemed prescriptions for methylphenidate, modafinil or amphetamine/dexamphetamine/lisdexamphetamine, respectively. Initiation of methylphenidate was not associated with a significant change in psychiatric admissions (mean: −0.02 admissions, p = 0.11) or inpatient days (mean: 0.13 days, p = 0.74). Similar findings were made for modafinil and the amphetamines. In addition, no clinically relevant change in psychiatric admissions or inpatient days was found after termination of a stimulant. After initiation of methylphenidate, the incidents of self-harm or suicide attempts were reduced by 54%, from 68 to 31 events ( p = 0.004). No significant change in incidents of self-harm or suicide attempts were found for modafinil or the amphetamines. Conclusion: This nationwide study, using naturalistic outcomes, does not support the use of stimulants in patients with depression. However, the use of methylphenidate was associated with a 54% reduction in incidents of self-harm or suicide attempts, indicating that methylphenidate may potentially be useful in patients with depression with suicidal- or self-harming behaviour. However, further studies are needed, before any firm conclusions can be made.

Background: This is the first report of the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of the selective, potent and brain-penetrant P2X7 receptor (P2X7R) antagonist JNJ-54175446. Activation of the P2X7R, an adenosine triphosphate-gated ion channel, leads to the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which have been linked to neuroinflammation and play a role in the pathogenesis of mood disorders. Previous clinical studies with JNJ-54175446 demonstrated peripheral target engagement of JNJ-54175446 by assessing ex vivo lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated cytokine production. Blood–brain barrier penetration and a clear dose–receptor occupancy relationship was demonstrated using positron emission tomography. Aims: The objectives of this double-blind, placebo-controlled, translational study were to assess the safety and tolerability of administering multiple doses of JNJ-54175446 and to explore its PD effects using a dexamphetamine challenge. Methods: Subjects ( N = 64) were randomised to either JNJ-54175446 (50–450 mg; n = 48) or placebo ( n = 16) and underwent a baseline oral 20 mg dexamphetamine challenge followed by 11 consecutive days q.d. dosing with JNJ-54175446/placebo and a randomised crossover dexamphetamine/placebo challenge. Results: At all doses tested, JNJ-54175446 was well tolerated and suppressed the ex vivo LPS-induced release of cytokines. At doses ⩾100 mg, JNJ-54175446 attenuated dexamphetamine-induced increases in locomotion and enhanced the mood-elevating effects of dexamphetamine, suggesting that a dose that is approximately twice as high is needed to obtain a central PD response compared to the dose needed for maximum peripheral occupancy. Conclusion: Overall, the observed pharmacological profile of JNJ-54175446 in the dexamphetamine challenge paradigm is compatible with a potential mood-modulating effect.

Risky choice is the tendency to choose a large, uncertain reward over a small, certain reward, and is typically measured with probability discounting, in which the probability of obtaining the large reinforcer decreases across blocks of trials. One caveat to traditional procedures is that independent schedules are used, in which subjects can show exclusive preference for one alternative relative to the other. For example, some rats show exclusive preference for the small, certain reinforcer as soon as delivery of the large reinforcer becomes probabilistic. Therefore, determining if a drug increases risk aversion (i.e., decreases responding for the probabilistic alternative) is difficult (due to floor effects). The overall goal of this experiment was to use a concurrent-chains procedure that incorporated a dependent schedule during the initial link, thus preventing animals from showing exclusive preference for one alternative relative to the other. To determine how pharmacological manipulations alter performance in this task, male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 8) received injections of amphetamine (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1.0 mg/kg), methylphenidate (0, 0.3, 1.0, 3.0 mg/kg), and methamphetamine (0, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0 mg/kg). Amphetamine (0.25 mg/kg) and methylphenidate (3.0 mg/kg) selectively increased risky choice, whereas higher doses of amphetamine (0.5 and 1.0 kg/mg) and each dose of methamphetamine impaired stimulus control (i.e., flattened the discounting function). These results show that dependent schedules can be used to measure risk-taking behavior and that psychostimulants promote suboptimal choice when this schedule is used. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate whether birthweight was less among infants of women taking amphetamine–dextroamphetamine during pregnancy at our academic institution. Method: We identified mother–infant pairs with documented exposure to amphetamine–dextroamphetamine in pregnancy from 2005 through 2015. Patients were matched 2:1 with unexposed controls. Charts were reviewed for known causes of intrauterine growth restriction. Analysis of birthweight used generalized estimating equation blocking on matching. Medical histories were analyzed with χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test. Results: We identified 53 exposed mother–infant pairs. The difference in mean birthweight of infants exposed to amphetamine–dextroamphetamine versus those not exposed was 26.9 g, which is not significant (95% confidence interval [CI] = [−141, 195 g]; p = .75). A significant difference was noted for exposed versus unexposed mothers for comorbid psychiatric illness and history of substance abuse ( p < .001). Conclusion: With a limited sample size, our study suggests no significant difference in birthweight.

Gambling disorder (GD) is a behavioral addiction that may be linked to alterations in dopamine (DA) systems. Gambling involves chronic exposure to uncertain reward, which can sensitize the activity of DA systems. Here we explored how combinations of Pavlovian and instrumental uncertainty impact DA sensitization and risky decision-making. Experiment 1: 40 rats underwent 66 uncertainty exposure (UE) sessions during which they responded for saccharin. Animal responding was reinforced according to a fixed or variable (FR/VR) ratio schedule that turned on a conditioned stimulus (CS; light), which predicted saccharin on 50% or 100% of trials. Animals responded under one of the four conditions: FR-CS100% (no uncertainty), VR-CS100%, FR-CS50%, and VR-CS50% (maximal uncertainty). DA sensitization was inferred from an enhanced locomotor response to d-amphetamine (d-AMPH; 0.5 mg/kg) challenge. The rat gambling task (rGT) was used to assess decision-making. Experiment 2: 24 rats received 5 weeks of sensitizing d-AMPH or saline doses, followed by locomotor activity and rGT testing. Experiment 3: Effects of UE and a sensitizing d-AMPH regimen on DA D1, D2, and D3 receptor binding were assessed in 44 rats using autoradiography. Compared to FR-CS100%, VR-CS100% and VR-CS50% rats displayed a greater locomotor response to d-AMPH, and VR-CS50% rats demonstrated riskier decision-making. Chronic d-AMPH-treated rats mirrored the effects of VR-CS50% groups on these two indices. Both VR-CS50% and d-AMPH-treated groups had increased striatal DA D2 receptor binding. These results suggest that chronic uncertainty exposure, similar to exposure to a sensitizing d-AMPH regimen, sensitized the function of DA systems and increased risky decision-making.

Background and Aims: Sustained-release (SR) formulations of dexamphetamine and mixed amphetamine salts have shown positive effects in the treatment of patients with a cocaine use disorder. We previously demonstrated the efficacy of SR-dexamphetamine for patients with cocaine dependence in terms of cocaine use reductions. In this secondary analysis, we assessed whether SR-dexamphetamine treatment also improves the health status of these patients. Design: Multi-centre randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Setting: Four supervised heroin-assisted treatment (HAT) out-patient clinics in the Netherlands. In HAT, methadone treatment-refractory opioid-dependent patients can self-administer individually titrated doses of pharmaceutical grade diacetylmorphine, coprescribed with oral methadone. Participants: Seventy-three cocaine-dependent patients (90% males; average age = 48.7 years), participating in HAT for their treatment-refractory comorbid opioid dependence. Interventions: Twelve weeks pharmacotherapy with once-daily, supervised intake of two tablets of SR-dexamphetamine (2 × 30 mg/day) or two identical placebo tablets. Measurements: Assessment every 4 weeks: cocaine use (time-line follow-back), physical health (Maudsley Addiction Profile–Health Symptoms Scale), mental health (Brief Symptom Inventory) and illegal activities (Addiction Severity Index). Primary outcome was ‘overall health’, a dichotomous, multi-domain response index based on physical health, mental health and social functioning. Findings: Compared with placebo, SR-dexamphetamine resulted in larger increases in the number of cocaine abstinent days (P = 0.004) and the proportion of overall health treatment responders (P = 0.045) from the 4 weeks preceding baseline to the final 4 weeks of treatment. While the number of cocaine abstinent days was not associated with overall health in the total study sample, it was positively associated with overall health among patients in poor overall health at the start of SR-dexamphetamine treatment (n = 50), i.e. patients with the potential to improve on this multi-domain response index (odds ratio = 1.076; 95% confidence interval = 1.025–1.130). Conclusions: SR-dexamphetamine reduces cocaine use and may improve clinically relevant health-related outcomes in patients with cocaine dependence who are participating in heroin-assisted treatment for their comorbid heroin dependence.

Patients with psychotic disorders present alterations in thalamocortical intrinsic functional connectivity as measured by resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Specifically, thalamic intrinsic functional connectivity is increased with sensorimotor cortices (hyperconnectivity) and decreased with prefrontal limbic cortices (hypoconnectivity). Psychedelics such as lysergic acid diethlyamide (LSD) elicit similar thalamocortical hyperconnectivity with sensorimotor areas in healthy volunteers. It is unclear whether LSD also induces thalamocortical hypoconnectivity with prefrontal limbic cortices, because current findings are equivocal. Thalamocortical hyperconnectivity was associated with psychotic symptoms in patients and substance-induced altered states of consciousness in healthy volunteers. Thalamocortical dysconnectivity is likely evoked by altered neurotransmission, e.g., via dopaminergic excess in psychotic disorders and serotonergic agonism in psychedelic-induced states. It is unclear whether thalamocortical dysconnectivity is also elicited by amphetamine-type substances, broadly releasing monoamines (i.e., dopamine, norepinephrine) but producing fewer perceptual effects than psychedelics.We administrated LSD, d-amphetamine, and 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in 28 healthy volunteers and investigated their effects on thalamic intrinsic functional connectivity with 2 brain networks (auditory-sensorimotor and salience networks, corresponding to sensorimotor and prefrontal limbic cortices, respectively), using a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design.All active substances elicited auditory-sensorimotor-thalamic hyperconnectivity compared with placebo, despite predominantly distinct pharmacological actions and subjective effects. LSD-induced effects correlated with subjective changes in perception, indicating a link between hyperconnectivity and psychedelic-type perceptual alterations. Unlike d-amphetamine and MDMA, which induced hypoconnectivity with the salience network, LSD elicited hyperconnectivity. D-amphetamine and MDMA evoked similar thalamocortical dysconnectivity patterns.Psychedelics, empathogens, and psychostimulants evoke thalamocortical hyperconnectivity with sensorimotor areas, akin to findings in patients with psychotic disorders.

Background: The continued increase in prevalence of methamphetamine use in the United States has resulted in a significant increase in the number of patients entering treatment for methamphetamine use. However, no robustly efficacious pharmacologic treatment for methamphetamine use or withdrawal has been identified to date after stopping methamphetamine use. Aims: Given the association between methamphetamine withdrawal and relapse during early treatment, this study tested a controlled d-amphetamine withdrawal paradigm among methamphetamine-using individuals. Methods: Treatment-seeking adults who used methamphetamine ( N = 34; 47% female; 100% white) were enrolled in a 4-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in a residential setting, in which all participants were maintained on d-amphetamine (30 mg BID) during week 1, then half were switched to placebo during weeks 2–3. All participants received placebo during week 4. Outcomes included vital signs, withdrawal, cravings for methamphetamine, mood, and cognition. Bivariate analyses tested treatment group differences on baseline demographic and outcome variables. Repeated measures models examined main and interaction effects of treatment over time. Results/Outcomes: Participants were successfully randomized and safely stabilized on d-amphetamine. Craving for methamphetamine increased during weeks 2–3 in the placebo group relative to those on d-amphetamine. Interactions with age and heart rate were noted. Conclusions/Interpretation: To our knowledge, this is the first double-blind, placebo-controlled trial measuring pharmacologic effects of abruptly stopping controlled d-amphetamine administration in adults who use methamphetamine. Results support the potential of this withdrawal paradigm to further examine the efficacy of pharmacologic agents in ameliorating methamphetamine withdrawal symptoms.

In order to further elucidate the role of mesolimbic peptides in the expression of ethanol reward, the present study investigated the effects of ghrelin and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) on ethanol intake, in addition to ethanol intake stimulated by systemic d-amphetamine or cocaine treatment. While a number of studies suggest that ghrelin plays an important role in mesolimbic reward, emerging data now indicate that GLP-1 receptor mechanisms inhibit reward signaling, possibly by directly or indirectly inhibiting ghrelinergic activity within the mesolimbic system. In the present study all rats were initially habituated to a 6% ethanol solution. We then demonstrated that intraperitoneal injections of d-amphetamine and cocaine increased ethanol intake compared to the vehicle condition. In subsequent testing we examined the effects of ventral tegmental area (VTA) ghrelin or vehicle paired with a fixed dose of d-amphetamine or vehicle. In separate rats we then investigated the impact of the GLP-1 agonist exendin-4 (Ex-4), injected into the VTA, on ethanol intake alone, or when Ex-4 was co-administered with d-amphetamine or cocaine. Our results indicated that VTA ghrelin significantly increased ethanol intake, and most importantly, potentiated the effect of d-amphetamine and cocaine on ethanol consumption. Conversely, VTA Ex-4 inhibited ethanol intake and antagonized the stimulatory effect of d-amphetamine and cocaine on ethanol consumption. In a final study we further demonstrated that VTA Ex-4 treatment significantly inhibited the combined stimulatory effects of ghrelin paired with d-amphetamine or ghrelin paired with cocaine. Overall our findings are consistent with a critical role for both ghrelin and GLP-1 receptor mechanisms in mesolimbic ethanol reward circuitry. Moreover, our results further suggest that ghrelin and GLP-1 modulate the stimulatory effect of psychostimulants on ethanol intake.

Stimulant drug-paired cues can acquire the ability to activate mesocorticolimbic pathways and lead to new bouts of drug use. Studies in laboratory animals suggest that these effects are augmented by progressively greater drug use histories, impulsive personality traits, and acute drug ingestion. As a preliminary test of these hypotheses in humans, we exposed cocaine users (n = 14) and healthy volunteers (n = 10) to cocaine-related videos during two functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) sessions, once following acute administration of placebo and once following d-amphetamine (0.3 mg/kg, p.o.). Across sessions, cocaine users showed larger cocaine cue-induced responses than healthy controls in the associative striatum and midbrain. Among the cocaine users, larger drug cue-induced responses during the placebo session were correlated with higher Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) nonplanning scores (associative striatum) and greater lifetime use of stimulant drugs (limbic, associative, and sensorimotor striatum). The administration of d-amphetamine did not augment the cue-induced activations, but, in cocaine users, drug cue-induced striatal activations were more widespread following prolonged cocaine cue exposure. Together, these effects of past and present drug use might aggravate the risk for stimulant drug use problems.

The effectiveness of ketamine for treatment-resistant depression along with several other clinical advantages, such as rapid onset and reduced adverse effects associated with serotonin transporter inhibition, has garnered interest in other similar acting psychedelics as novel antidepressant drugs. The antitussive dextromethorphan exhibits glutamate N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonism, sigma-1 receptor agonism, and serotonin reuptake inhibition, which has exhibited antidepressant effects in limited human studies and animal models. The present study sought to further examine dextromethorphan using a differential reinforcement of low-rate 72-s schedule, which can be used to screen antidepressant drugs, in male and female rats. The tricyclic antidepressant drug imipramine and the psychostimulant d-amphetamine also were examined. Sex differences were not shown for baseline performance or for the drugs tested. Further, performance did not differ between the estrus and diestrus stages. Dextromethorphan alone and with quinidine produced an antidepressant-like effect by reducing the number of responses emitted, increasing the number of reinforcers earned, and shifting inter-response times to the right, although significant response suppression occurred at these doses. An antidepressant-like effect was shown with imipramine, but d-amphetamine increased the number of responses emitted and did not affect the number of reinforcers earned. The present findings provide additional support for antidepressant effects produced by dextromethorphan.

OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical course and novel biochemical changes in 3 cats with lisdexamfetamine (LDX) toxicosis. SERIES SUMMARY Three cats presented with LDX exposure and initially displayed typical clinical signs of amphetamine toxicosis. However, over the course of hospitalization, hypoglycemia and markedly elevated creatine kinase levels consistent with rhabdomyolysis ensued. All cats were treated with sedatives including phenothiazines and dexmedetomidine. Two cats were hospitalized for 4 days and 1 for 5 days. All cats survived. NEW OR UNIQUE INFORMATION PROVIDED This is the first case series in cats that reports the novel biochemical changes of delayed hypoglycemia and elevated creatine kinase several days into hospitalization for the treatment of LDX toxicity. The development of delayed clinical signs suggests reconsideration of established hospitalization guidelines for amphetamine ingestion in cats.

Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is the only drug currently approved by the FDA for the treatment of Binge-Eating Disorder (BED), but little is known about the behavioural mechanisms that underpin the efficacy of LDX in treating BED. We examined the behavioural and neural effects of an acute dose of LDX (50 mg) in 22 women with binge-eating symptomatology using a randomised, crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled experimental medicine design. LDX reduced self-reported appetite ratings and intake of both a pasta meal and a palatable cookie snack. LDX also decreased the eating rate of pasta but not of cookies and reduced self-reported liking ratings for pasta at the end of the meal. When viewing food pictures during an fMRI scan, LDX reduced activity bilaterally in the thalamus. LDX enhanced sustained attention and reduced impulsive responding in a continuous performance task but had no effect on emotional bias or working memory. These results suggest the observed effects of LDX on food intake (and by implication the efficacy of LDX in treating BED) may be related to the actions of the drug to enhance satiety, reduce food-related reward responding when full and/or increase cognitive control. Novel pharmacotherapies for BED might be most effective if they have a broad spectrum of effects on appetite, reward and cognition.

Background A high proportion of people receiving both oral and injectable opioid agonist treatment report concurrent use of stimulants (i.e. cocaine and or amphetamines), which has been associated with higher rates of continued illicit opioid use and treatment dropout. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine (a prescribed stimulant) at reducing craving for and use of cocaine among patients receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment. Following this evidence, dextroamphetamine has been prescribed to patients with stimulant use disorder at a clinic in Vancouver. This study investigates perceptions of the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine from the perspective of these patients. Methods Data were collected using small focus groups and one-on-one interviews with patients who were currently or formerly receiving dextroamphetamine (n = 20). Thematic analysis was conducted using an iterative approach, moving between data collection and analysis to search for patterns in the data across transcripts. This process led to the defining and naming of three central themes responding to the research question. Results Participants reported a range of stimulant use types, including cocaine (n = 8), methamphetamine (n = 8), or both (n = 4). Three central themes were identified as relating to participants’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the medication: 1) achieving a substitution effect (i.e. extent to which dextroamphetamine provided a substitution for the effect they received from use of illicit stimulants); 2) Reaching a preferred dose (i.e. speed of titration and effect of the dose received); and 3) Ease of medication access (i.e. preference for take home doses (i.e. carries) vs. medication integrated into care at the clinic). Conclusion In the context of continued investigation of pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, the present study has highlighted how the study of clinical outcomes could be extended to account for factors that contribute to perceptions of effectiveness from the perspective of patients. In practice, elements of treatment delivery (e.g. dosing and dispensation protocols) can be adjusted to allow for various scenarios (e.g. on site vs. take home dosing) by which dextroamphetamine and other pharmacological stimulants could be implemented to provide “effective” treatment for people with a wide range of treatment goals and needs.

Stimulants (methylphenidate or amphetamines) are the recommended first-line option for the pharmacological treatment of individuals with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). However, some patients with ADHD will not respond optimally to stimulants. Here, we discuss strategies to manage stimulant-refractory ADHD, based on the recommendations advanced in clinical guidelines, knowledge of expert practice in the field, and our own clinical recommendations, informed by a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, PsycInfo, EMBASE + EMBASE classic, OVID Medline, and Web of Science (up to 30 March 2021). We first highlight the importance of stimulant optimization as an effective strategy to increase response. We then discuss a series of factors that should be considered before using alternative pharmacological strategies for ADHD, including poor adherence, time action properties of stimulants (and wearing-off of effects), poor tolerability (that prevents the use of higher, more effective doses), excessive focus on or confounding from presence of comorbid non-ADHD symptoms, and tolerance. Finally, we consider the role of non-stimulants and combined pharmacological approaches. While the choice of medication for ADHD is still to a large extent based on a trial-and-error process, there are reasonably accepted data and guidelines to aid in clinical decision-making. It is hoped that advances in precision psychiatry in the years ahead will further guide prescribers to tailor medication choice to the specific characteristics of the patient.

In human beings and experimental animals, maladaptive impulsivity is manifested by the acute injection of psychostimulants, such as amphetamine. Cannabinoid CB1 receptors have been implicated in the regulation of stimulant-induced impulsive action, but the role of CB1 receptors in timing-related impulsive action by amphetamine remains unknown. Male rats were used in evaluating the effects of CB1 receptor antagonist and agonist (SR141716A and WIN55,212–2, respectively) systemically administered individually and combined with d-amphetamine on a differential reinforcement of low-rate response (DRL) task, an operant behavioral test of timing and behavioral inhibition characterized as a type of timing impulsive action. A distinct pattern of DRL behavioral changes was produced by acute d-amphetamine (0, 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mg/kg) treatment in a dose-dependent fashion, whereas no significant dose effect was detected for acute SR141716A (0, 0.3, 1, and 3 mg/kg) or WIN55,212–2 (0, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg/kg) treatment. Furthermore, DRL behavior altered by 1.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine was reversed by a noneffective dose of SR141716A (3 mg/kg) pretreatment. The minimally influenced DRL behavior by 0.5 mg/kg d-amphetamine was affected by pretreatment with a noneffective dose of WIN55,212–2 (1 mg/kg). These findings reveal that the activation and blockade of CB1 receptors can differentially modulate the timing impulsive action of DRL behavior induced by acute amphetamine treatment. Characterizing how CB1 receptors modulate impulsive behavior will deepen our understanding of the cannabinoid psychopharmacology of impulsivity and may be helpful in developing an optimal pharmacotherapy for reducing maladaptive impulsivity in patients with some psychiatric disorders.

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) in early-phase development of novel drugs targeting the central nervous system, is well established for the evaluation of brain penetration and target engagement. However, when novel targets are involved a suitable PET ligand is not always available. We demonstrate an alternative approach that evaluates the attenuation of amphetamine-induced synaptic dopamine release by a novel agonist of the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor GPR139 (TAK-041). GPR139 agonism is a novel candidate mechanism for the treatment of schizophrenia and other disorders associated with social and cognitive dysfunction. Ten healthy volunteers underwent [

The present study evaluated the effects of the coadministration of lithium (Li) and Cel on inflammatory parameters in an animal model of mania induced by dextroamphetamine (D-amph). It was used Wistar rats 60 days old (250–350 g). The animals (n = 10 per group) received D-amph (2 mg/kg) or saline solution of NaCl 0.9% (Sal) intraperitoneally once a day for 14 days. From day eight until 14, the animals from the D-amph and Sal groups received Li (24 mg/kg), Cel (20 mg/kg), Li + Cel or water via gavage. Behavioral analyses were performed using the open-field test. The levels of IL-1β, IL-4, IL-10, and TNF-α were evaluated. The administration of D-amph induced hyperactivity in the rats, as well increased the IL-4, IL-10, and TNF-α levels in the serum, frontal cortex, and striatum of rats compared to those of the controls, and treatment with Li plus Cel reversed these alterations. In general, the administration of Li or Cel per se did not have effects on the behavioral and biochemical parameters. However, the treatment with Cel per se decreased only the IL-10 levels in the serum of animals. Besides, the treatment with Li or Cel decreased the IL-4 levels in the serum and reversed the effects of D-amph on this parameter in the frontal cortex. The treatment with Li reversed the effects of D-amph on the TNF-α levels in all tissues evaluated, and the administration of Cel reversed this alteration only in the striatum. It can be observed that treatment with Li plus Cel was more effective against damages caused by D-amph when compared to the administration of both treatments per se, suggesting that the coadministration can be more effective to treat BD rather than Li or Cel itself. The treatment with Li plus Cel was effective against the inflammation induced by D-amph.

Dopaminergic stimulation has been proposed as a treatment strategy for post-traumatic brain injured patients in minimally conscious state based on a clinical trial using amantadine, a weak dopamine transporter blocker. However, a specific contribution of dopaminergic neuromodulation in minimally conscious state is undemonstrated. In a phase 0 clinical trial, we evaluated 13 normal volunteers and seven post-traumatic minimally conscious state patients using 11C-raclopride PET to estimate dopamine 2-like receptors occupancy in the striatum and central thalamus before and after dopamine transporter blockade with dextroamphetamine. If a presynaptic deficit was observed, a third and a fourth 11C-raclopride PET were acquired to evaluate changes in dopamine release induced by l-DOPA and l-DOPA+dextroamphetamine. Permutation analysis showed a significant reduction of dopamine release in patients, demonstrating a presynaptic deficit in the striatum and central thalamus that could not be reversed by blocking the dopamine transporter. However, administration of the dopamine precursor l-DOPA reversed the presynaptic deficit by restoring the biosynthesis of dopamine from both ventral tegmentum and substantia nigra. The advantages of alternative pharmacodynamic approaches in post-traumatic minimally conscious state patients should be tested in clinical trials, as patients currently refractory to amantadine might benefit from them.

RATIONALE: The underlying pharmacological mechanisms of mephedrone, especially as related to interactions with different neurotransmitter systems, are a critical area of study as mephedrone continues to be abused. OBJECTIVE: Direct-acting 5-HT(2A/2C) receptor agonists and antagonists and D(1–3) receptor antagonists were examined in two groups of rats trained to discriminate mephedrone. A high dose of mephedrone was trained to extend previous results with traditional monoamine transporter inhibitors and substrate releasers. A very low dose of mephedrone was trained to preferentially capture serotonergic activity and to minimize the influence of rate-decreasing effects on substitution patterns. Selective 5-HT(2A/2C) and D(1–3) receptor antagonists were examined in both groups. METHODS: Male, Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate either a low dose of 0.5 mg/kg mephedrone (N=24) or a high dose of 3.2 mg/kg mephedrone (N= 11) from saline. RESULTS: In the low training-dose group, mephedrone, MDMA, methamphetamine, d-amphetamine, cocaine, and enantiomers of mephedrone substituted for mephedrone; mCPP partially substituted overall for mephedrone; and, DOI, WAY163909, and morphine failed to substitute for mephedrone. In the high training-dose group, only mephedrone and MDMA substituted for mephedrone. Sulpiride produced a small antagonism of the low training dose of mephedrone while SCH23390, SB242084, and ketanserin altered response rates. CONCLUSIONS: A lower training dose of mephedrone produces a discriminative stimulus fully mimicked by MDMA, methamphetamine, cocaine, and d-amphetamine whereas a higher training dose of mephedrone requires a discriminative stimulus that was only mimicked by MDMA. Dopaminergic or serotoninergic antagonists failed to produce significant blockade of mephedrone at either training dose.

Drug studies are powerful models to investigate the neuropharmacological mechanisms underlying temporal processing in humans. This study administered dexamphetamine to 24 healthy volunteers to investigate time perception at different time scales, along with contributions from working memory. Healthy volunteers were administered 0.45 mg/kg dexamphetamine or placebo in a double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled design. Time perception was assessed using three experimental tasks: a time-discrimination task, which asked participants to determine whether a comparison interval (1200 ± 0, 50, 100, 150, 200 ms) was shorter or longer than a standard interval (1200 ms); a retrospective time estimation task, which required participants to verbally estimate time intervals (10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 s) retrospectively; and a prospective time-production task, where participants were required to prospectively monitor the passing of time (10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 s). Working memory was assessed with the backwards digit span. On the discrimination task, there was a change in the proportion of long-to-short responses and reaction times in the dexamphetamine condition (but no association with working memory), consistent with an increase in the speed of an internal pacemaker, and an overestimation of durations in the timing of shorter intervals. There was an interaction between dexamphetamine, working memory, and performance on the estimation and production tasks, whereby increasing digit span scores were associated with decreasing interval estimates and increased produced intervals in the placebo condition, but were associated with increased interval estimates and decreased produced intervals after dexamphetamine administration. These findings indicate that the dexamphetamine-induced increase in the speed of the internal pacemaker was modulated by the basal working memory capacity of each participant. These findings in healthy humans have important implications for the role of dopamine, and its contributions to timing deficits, in models of psychiatric disorders.

Systemic pharmacological manipulation of dopamine (DA) signaling has been central to many investigations of 50 kHz ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in the rat. In particular, the indirect DA releaser d -amphetamine (AMPH) has been used extensively in many such investigations. The possible unique character of the native transmitter relative to DA-stimulating drugs such as AMPH in inducing and modulating emission of 50 kHz USVs has not been investigated. Adult male Long Evans rats were tested with intracerebral application of DA into the nucleus accumbens shell at several doses (3.75 μg–120 μg) to determine its capacity to induce 50 kHz USV emission. Additionally, the call profile characteristics of intracerebral DA injections were compared with those of intracerebral application of AMPH. Results indicated that local increases in DA signaling within the nucleus accumbens shell are sufficient to increase 50 kHz call rate, reduce latency to call, and increase the degree of frequency modulation of emitted USVs. However, our results found that microinjections of DA were not as efficacious in either inducing 50 kHz USVs or increasing frequency modulation without antagonism of the dopamine reuptake transporter when compared with AMPH. In summary, these results support the notion that the native transmitter DA is driving the increase in frequency modulation seen after administration of DA stimulating drugs. These results also suggest that drugs affecting dopamine may be altering the 50 kHz call profile in a distinct manner from the native transmitter and thus caution should be used in interpreting their effects.

RATIONALE: 3,4-Methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) is a popular synthetic cathinone reported to have a high abuse potential. Recent preclinical research indicates the psychopharmacology of MDPV is comparable to cocaine. Despite a recent influx of research on the psychopharmacology of MDPV, few studies have employed preclinical drug discrimination methods to discern the neurochemical mechanisms involved in its interoceptive stimulus effects. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate a variety of monoaminergic agents for substitution, potentiation or antagonism in rats trained to discriminate MDPV. METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 0.5 (Experiment 1) or 1 mg/kg MDPV (Experiment 2) from saline under an FR 20 schedule of food reinforcement. In Experiment 1, MDMA, MDA and their respective optical isomers (0.75 – 3 mg/kg), cocaine (2.5 - 20 mg/kg), GBR 12909 (5-40 mg/kg), and desipramine (3.2-10 mg/kg) were assessed for substitution. GBR 12909 (40 mg/kg) and desipramine (3.2 mg/kg) were subsequently assessed for potentiation of the MDPV cue. In Experiment 2, stimulus antagonism tests were conducted with dopamine antagonists (Sch 23390, haloperidol) and serotonin antagonists (pirenperone, MDL100907, WAY 100635). RESULTS: The MDMA and MDA enantiomers produced divergent results, with virtually no substitution by (−)-MDMA or (−)-MDA, partial substitution with (+)-MDA, and full substitution with (+)-MDMA, as well as full substitution by the racemates, (±)-MDMA and (±)-MDA. Consistent with previous findings, cocaine fully substituted for MDPV. Although no dose of GBR 12909 or desipramine substituted for MDPV, these reuptake inhibitors enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of lower MDPV doses. Both D1 (Sch 23390) and D2 (haloperidol) DA antagonists attenuated 1 mg/kg MDPV discrimination, whereas none of the 5-HT antagonists assessed altered MDPV discrimination. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate MDPV’s interoceptive stimulus effects are mediated predominantly by dopaminergic actions, although serotonergic and/or noradrenergic modulation of these effects cannot be ruled out. Further investigations into the neurochemical actions involved in the discriminative stimulus effects of MDPV may serve to inform medication discovery and development for the treatment of MDPV abuse.

Stimulant drugs used for treating attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) increase signal-detection accuracy in five-choice serial reaction-time procedures. These increases may result from drug-induced increases in control exerted by the stimuli that prompt responses, which was assessed in the present study. Mice were trained with food reinforcement to nose poke into one of five holes after its illumination (signal), and effects of methylphenidate, d-amphetamine, and pentobarbital were assessed. Subsequently, the time from trial onset to signal was changed from fixed to variable for one group of subjects. A 'warning' stimulus (change in ambient lighting) preceding the signal was added for a second group. Effects of the drugs were reassessed. Dose-related increases in accuracy of signal detection (nose pokes in hole where a signal was displayed) were obtained with methylphenidate and d-amphetamine, but not with pentobarbital. When the presignal time was variable, increases in signal detection were not obtained with either stimulant. When a warning stimulus preceded the signal, the increases in accuracy were similar to those obtained without the warning stimulus. Hence, a procedure that increased vigilance demand (using a variable prestimulus period) eliminated the effects of drugs useful in treating ADHD, whereas a procedure that decreased vigilance demand (adding the warning light) had no appreciable effects on the response to stimulant drugs. Taken together, the present results suggest that the five-choice serial reaction-time has predictive validity for selecting drugs effective for treating ADHD, although effects can depend critically on the stimulus conditions used and the vigilance required by the procedure.

The stop-signal task is a well-established assessment of response inhibition, and in humans, proficiency is linked to dorsal striatum D(2) receptor availability. Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by changes to efficiency of response inhibition. Here, we studied 17 PD patients (6 female and 11 male) using the stop-signal paradigm in a single-blinded d-amphetamine (dAMPH) study. Participants completed [(18)F]fallypride positron emission topography (PET) imaging in both placebo and dAMPH conditions. A voxel-wise analysis of the relationship between binding potential (BP(ND)) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) revealed that faster SSRT is associated with greater D(2)-like BP(ND) in the amygdala and hippocampus (right cluster q(FDR-corr) = 0.026, left cluster q(FDR-corr) = 0.002). A region of interest (ROI) examination confirmed this association in both the amygdala (coefficient = −48.26, p = 0.005) and hippocampus (coefficient = −104.94, p = 0.007). As healthy dopaminergic systems in the dorsal striatum appear to regulate response inhibition, we interpret our findings in PD to indicate either nigrostriatal damage unmasking a mesolimbic contribution to response inhibition, or a compensatory adaptation from the limbic and mesial temporal dopamine systems. These novel results expand the conceptualization of action-control networks, whereby limbic and motor loops may be functionally connected. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While Parkinson's disease (PD) is characteristically recognized for its motor symptoms, some patients develop impulsive and compulsive behaviors (ICBs), manifested as repetitive and excessive participation in reward-driven activities, including sex, gambling, shopping, eating, and hobbyism. Such cognitive alterations compel a consideration of response inhibition in PD. To investigate inhibitory control and assess the brain regions that may participate, we assessed PD patients using a single-blinded d-amphetamine (dAMPH) study, with [(18)F]fallypride positron emission topography (PET) imaging, and stop-signal task performance. We find a negative relationship between D(2)-like binding in the mesial temporal region and top-signal reaction time (SSRT), with greater BP(ND) associated with a faster SSRT. These discoveries indicate a novel role for mesolimbic dopamine in response inhibition, and advocate for limbic regulation of action control in this clinical population.

Background: A high proportion of people receiving both oral and injectable opioid agonist treatment report concurrent use of stimulants (i.e. cocaine and or amphetamines), which has been associated with higher rates of continued illicit opioid use and treatment dropout. A recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine (a prescribed stimulant) at reducing craving for and use of cocaine among patients receiving injectable opioid agonist treatment. Following this evidence, dextroamphetamine has been prescribed to patients with stimulant use disorder at a clinic in Vancouver. This study investigates perceptions of the effectiveness of dextroamphetamine from the perspective of these patients.Methods: Data were collected using small focus groups and one-on-one interviews with patients who were currently or formerly receiving dextroamphetamine (n=20). Thematic analysis was conducted using an iterative approach, moving between data collection and analysis to search for patterns in the data across transcripts. This process led to the defining and naming of three central themes responding to the research question. Results: Participants reported a range of stimulant use types, including cocaine (n=8), methamphetamine (n=8), or both (n=4). Three central themes were identified as relating to participants’ perceptions of the effectiveness of the medication: 1) achieving a substitution effect (i.e. extent to which dextroamphetamine provided a substitution for the effect they received from use of illicit stimulants); 2) Reaching a preferred dose (i.e. speed of titration and effect of the dose received); and 3) Ease of medication access (i.e. preference for take home doses (i.e. carries) vs. medication integrated into care at the clinic).Conclusion: In the context of continued investigation of pharmacological treatments for stimulant use disorder, the present study has highlighted how the study of clinical outcomes could be extended to account for factors that contribute to perceptions of effectiveness from the perspective of patients. In practice, elements of treatment delivery (e.g. dosing and dispensation protocols) can be adjusted to allow for various scenarios (e.g. on site vs. take home dosing) by which dextroamphetamine and other pharmacological stimulants could be implemented to provide “effective” treatment for people with a wide range of treatment goals and needs.

Background and purpose Quercetin is a well-known plant flavonoid with neuroprotective properties. Earlier work suggested it may relieve psychiatric disorders, cognition deficits and memory dysfunction through anti-oxidant and/or radical scavenging mechanisms. In addition, quercetin modulated the physiological function of some ion channels. However, the detailed ionic mechanisms of the bioeffects of quercetin remain unknown. Experimental approach Effects of quercetin on neuronal activities in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and its ionic mechanisms were analysed by calcium imaging using mice bearing a green fluorescent protein, calmodulin, and M13 fusion protein and patch clamp in acute brain slices from C57BL/6 J mice and in HEK 293 cells. The possible ionic mechanism of action of quercetin on D-amphetamine-induced manic-like effects in mice was explored with c-fos staining and the open field behaviour test. Key results Quercetin reduced calcium influx triggered by PFC pyramidal neuronal activity. This effect involved increasing the rheobase of neuronal firing through decreasing membrane resistance following quercetin treatment. Spadin, a blocker of TREK-1 potassium channels, also blocked the effect of quercetin on the membrane resistance and neuronal firing. Further, spadin blocked the neuroprotective effects of quercetin. The effects of quercetin on TREK-1 channels could be mimicked by GF109203X, a protein kinase C inhibitor. In vivo, injection of quercetin relieved the manic hyperlocomotion in mice, induced by D-amphetamine. This action was partly alleviated by spadin. Conclusion and implications TREK-1 channels are a novel target for quercetin, by inhibiting PKC. This action could contribute to both the neuroprotective and anti-manic-like effects.

INTRODUCTION: Fatigue is a common problem in aviation. The identification of efficacious fatigue countermeasures is crucial for sustaining flight performance during fatigue-inducing operations. Stimulants are not recommended for consistent use, but are often implemented during flight operations with a high risk of fatigue. As such, it is important to evaluate the efficacy of approved stimulants for sustaining flight performance, alertness, and mood.METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, PsycInfo, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science) were systematically searched to identify research on the effects of caffeine, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil during simulated or in-flight operations.RESULTS: There were 12 studies identified that assessed the effects of at least 1 stimulant. Overall, dextroamphetamine and modafinil were effective for sustaining flight performance and pilot mood during extended wakefulness. Results with caffeine were inconsistent.DISCUSSION: Dextroamphetamine and modafinil appear to sustain flight performance and mood during extended wakefulness. However, most studies have used flight simulators and short operation durations. Additional research is needed in realistic settings and during longer duration operations. Caffeines effects were inconsistent across studies, possibly due to differences in study methodology or individual caffeine responses. Despite fatigue being a common problem in civilian aviation as well, only one study in this review included civil aviators. More research should be conducted on the effects of caffeine during civil operations.CONCLUSION: Dextroamphetamine and modafinil appear to be effective fatigue countermeasures but should be further evaluated in more ecologically valid settings. The effects of caffeine are unclear at this time and should continue to be evaluated.Ehlert AM, Wilson PB. Stimulant use as a fatigue countermeasure in aviation. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2021; 92(3):190200.

Misuse of dextroamphetamine occurs in work and recreational contexts. While acute drug effects broadly predict abuse liability, few studies have considered the relationship between acute effects and context.This study examined how individual differences in acute effects of dextroamphetamine relate to desire to take dextroamphetamine again in different contexts.This secondary analysis used data from healthy adults with no history of moderate-to-severe substance use disorder, who received oral doses of placebo and dextroamphetamine (10 and 20 mg) over 3 sessions under double-blind, randomized conditions. Subjects rated subjective effects and completed reward-related behavioral tasks. Subjects rated their desire to take dextroamphetamine again in hypothetical work and recreational contexts. Multilevel models examined within-subjects change scores (10 mg-placebo; 20 mg-placebo) to determine how subjective effects and behavioral outcomes predicted desire to take dextroamphetamine again for work versus recreation.Subjects reported more desire to take 20 mg dextroamphetamine again for work than for recreation. At 20 mg, there was an interaction between context and liking/wanting, such that liking/wanting predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine for work only. There was also an interaction at 20 mg between context and psychomotor speed, such that psychomotor speed predicted interest in using dextroamphetamine for recreation only.We found that positive subjective effects predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine again for work, while increased motor effects predicted desire to use dextroamphetamine recreationally. Hedonic effects may be perceived as advantageous when working, while increased physical energy may be preferred during recreation, suggesting that context of intended use is important when examining abuse liability.

Patient: Male, 6-year-old Final Diagnosis: Paradoxical effect of stimulants (adverse drug reaction) Symptoms: Sedation Medication:— Clinical Procedure: — Specialty: Pediatrics and Neonatology • Psychiatry Objective: Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment Background: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a common neurodevelopmental disorder that manifests in early childhood. Pharmacotherapy, including psychostimulants, is considered the cornerstone of ADHD management. Although stimulants have been associated with adverse effects, sedation following the administration of an amphetamine-based stimulant is an extremely rare adverse effect. Case Report: We report the case of a 6-year-old boy presenting with ADHD and a history of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). After discussing treatment options with his parents, he was started on a low dose of a methylphenidate medication. He was unable to tolerate the medication due to anorexia, insomnia, and irritability despite multiple adjustments in the dosages. A trial of immediate-release mixed amphetamine salts was initiated, starting from a low dose. The boy developed sedation and lethargy shortly after the administration of this medication. Conclusions: Sedation is a rare adverse drug reaction to mixed amphetamine salts. Clinicians should proactively monitor for the possible adverse effects in patients with ASD and ADHD, including unexpected symptoms such as sedation. Reporting of adverse drug reactions should be encouraged to promote the post-marketing surveillance of medications.