Search

The allocation of clinical and economic resources is an emerging issue in health management. A useful update necessarily depends on the evaluation of long-term outcomes of clinical and surgical resources that can permit emphasis on all amendable fields, improve quality of care, and reduce health costs. The PRIORITY (PRedictIng long term Outcomes afteR Isolated coronary arTery bypass surgerY) study represents the first innovative step toward the updating of health management in a selected field, surgery for coronary artery disease, which is one of the most prevalent diseases and requires allocation of high-cost resources, although information on long-term outcomes is limited. The aims of the PRIORITY study are the identification of preoperative risk factors for long-term outcomes and the development of clinical and administrative preoperative scores that can guide clinicians and the national health system to more appropriate actions for increasing quality of care and reducing costs.

Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p Conclusions OPCAB did not affect long-term mortality but is associated with an increased long-term risk of repeat PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation, particularly in a climate of cost containment of healthcare expenditures. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health

Background Contemporary scores for estimating perioperative death have been proposed to also predict also long-term death. The aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of the updated European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality score, and the Age, Creatinine, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction score for predicting long-term mortality in a contemporary cohort of isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR). We also sought to develop for each score a simple algorithm based on predicted perioperative risk to predict long-term survival. Methods Complete data on 1,444 patients who underwent isolated AVR in a 7-year period were retrieved from three prospective institutional databases and linked with the Italian Tax Register Information System. Data were evaluated with performance analyses and time-to-event semiparametric regression. Results Survival was 83.0% ± 1.1% at 5 years and 67.8 ± 1.9% at 8 years. Discrimination and calibration of all three scores both worsened for prediction of death at 1 year and 5 years. Nonetheless, a significant relationship was found between long-term survival and quartiles of scores (p < 0.0001). The estimated perioperative risk by each model was used to develop an algorithm to predict long-term death. The hazard ratios for death were 1.1 (95% confidence interval, 1.07 to 1.12) for European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.28 to 1.40) for the Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.06 to 1.10) for the Age, Creatinine, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction score. Conclusions The predicted risk generated by European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II, The Society of Thoracic Surgeons score, and Age, Creatinine, Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction scores cannot also be considered a direct estimate of the long-term risk for death. Nonetheless, the three scores can be used to derive an estimate of long-term risk of death in patients who undergo isolated AVR with the use of a simple algorithm.

Background Despite the well-known impact of female sex on outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR), few studies investigated its role after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods After propensity-matching for age, baseline comorbidities, previous interventions, priority, frailty score, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular function and associated cardiac diseases, hospital mortality, and procedure-related morbidities of 388 women (194 TAVR versus 194 sAVR)—of 5,231 patients enrolled in 70 centers participating in this prospective multicenter national registry—were analyzed at a central management unit of the Italian National Institute of Health. Results Although hospital mortality was comparable (4.1% TAVR versus 3.1% sAVR; p = 0.177), women undergoing sAVR showed a higher rate of transfusion (63.9% versus 37.1% TAVR; p = 0.0001); higher number of transfusions per patient (3.6 ± 0.4 versus 2.3 ± 0.3 TAVR; p = 0.049); a higher incidence of low cardiac output state (5.7% versus 3.6% TAVR; p = 0.017) and acute renal failure (8.8% versus 4.1% TAVR; p = 0.01); and higher mean transprosthetic gradients (15.7 ± 12.6 mm Hg versus 11.9 ± 10.7 mm Hg TAVR; p = 0.004). In contrast, women undergoing TAVR experienced significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (mild, 37.6% versus 7.7% sAVR; moderate-to-severe, 7.1% versus 1.5% sAVR; p = 0.0001) and a higher rate of stroke (7.7% versus 2.5% sAVR; p = 0.037), major vascular complications (9.3% versus 0.5% sAVR; p = 0.0001), pacemaker implantation (12.4% versus 6.2% sAVR; p = 0.004), need for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (1.0% versus 0% sAVR; p = 0.007), and longer intermediate care unit length of stay (2.5 ± 4.4 days versus 1.4 ± 2.6 days sAVR; p = 0.008). Perioperative myocardial infarction and lengths of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization were comparable (not significant). Conclusions Women undergoing sAVR and TAVR experienced different periprocedural morbidities. These data strongly suggest the need to strictly individualize the indications.

Background: There is still a wide debate concerning the performance of commonly used risk prediction models in assessing the risk of patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery. This study was designed to compare the performances of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II and age, creatinine, and ejection fraction (ACEF) score with those of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score and logistic EuroSCORE in patients undergoing isolated aortic valve surgery. Methods: Data on 1,758 consecutive patients who underwent isolated aortic valve replacement in a 6-year period were retrieved from 3 prospective institutional databases. Discriminatory power was assessed using the c-index. Calibration was evaluated with calibration curves and associated statistics. Results: In-hospital mortality rate was 1.4%. The discriminatory power was similar in all algorithms (area under the curve 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72 to 0.88 for logistic EuroSCORE; 0.81, 95% CI 0.73 to -0.88 for EuroSCORE II; 0.78, 95% CI 0.68 to 0.88 for ACEF; 0.85, 95% CI 0.78-0.93 for STS score) and not significantly different (p values > 0.05 for all tests). The EuroSCORE II had a better calibration, being the only score with nonsignificant associated statistics (unreliability test, Hosmer-Lemeshow test, and Spiegelhalter Z-test for calibration accuracy). Nonetheless, EuroSCORE II calibration plot highlighted a trend over under-prediction. Conclusions: The EuroSCORE II is a good predictor of perioperative mortality in isolated aortic valve surgery, with lower discrimination if compared with STS and a better calibration when compared with logistic EuroSCORE, ACEF, and STS scores. Its performance is optimal in the lowest tertile of patients, whereas it under-predicts mortality afterward. None of these algorithms seems suitable for risk estimation in mid and high-risk patients that are the ones who might benefit most from transcatheter procedures. © 2013 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

The comparison of hemodilution at the end of surgery is of limited use as it represents only a snapshot of a dynamic phenomenon. This study was undertaken to compare the perioperative hemoglobin curves of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting performed with minimized extracorporeal circulation, traditional cardiopulmonary bypass, and off-pump technique. The propensity score method was used to select three groups of patients, homogenous regarding preoperative and operative data, who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A generalized linear mixed model was used for estimating differences in perioperative hemoglobin trends among groups. The three groups were each composed of 50 patients with no differences in demographic data, preoperative risk profile, preoperative hemoglobin, or type of surgery. There was no significant difference in major postoperative complications. The pattern of the hemodilution curves was similar in patients operated with mini-circuit and off-pump technique (P > 005). Mini-circuit led to a 3.1 ± 11.9% hemoglobin reduction, which was similar to the off-pump group (1.6 ± 8.9%, P = 0.99 at ANOVA) and significantly different from the standard extracorporeal circuit group (16.0 ± 10.3%, P < 0.001 at ANOVA). The generalized linear mixed model determined that the standard circuit was the only independent predictor for increased hemodilution. Its effect on hemodilution was time-dependent and the slope of the hemoglobin curve was more pronounced between systemic heparinization and the end of surgery. Perioperative hemoglobin trends of patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with mini-circuit were similar to those of off-pump surgery and significantly less pronounced than those of standard extracorporeal circulation.

We read with interest the comments by Dr. Spadaccio and colleagues regarding the results of the OBSERVANT (Italian Observational Multicenter Registry) study, and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to clarify some of the issues raised in their letter. First, we would like to emphasize that

Introduction: Permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation represents a potential event after cardiac surgery. However, comprehensive investigation of robust patient cohorts in this respect is unavailable. Hypothesis: A multicenter retrospective study was undertaken to assess in-hospital and long-term postoperative outcome of a large patient population undergoing PPM soon after cardiac surgery procedures. Methods: Among 94.693 patients submitted to cardiac surgery procedures in 16 centers from 2000 to 2013, there were 1.156 patients (1.2 %) with PPM implantation during hospitalization postoperatively. Preoperative, in-hospital, and follow-up data were collected with a common dataset and analyzed. Follow-up was performed by direct visit, and PPM dependency was assessed by electrocardiogram and pacemaker check during periodic examinations. The identification of potential predictors of PPM dependency at follow-up was evaluated with a multivariate logistic regression. Results: Patient mean age was 69 years (range 17-92 years) and 53.4% were male. Preoperative electrocardiogram showed first degree atrio/ventricular block in 11.0% of patients, left bundle branch block in 11.1%, right bundle branch block in 11.0%, and atrial fibrillation in 22.8%, respectively. Most of the patients had had isolated aortic valve replacement (25.8%). Pacemakers were implanted after a median of 11 days after surgery. At follow-up, 43.6% of the patients did not show a PPM dependency with restoration of sinus rhythm. The multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that only preoperative right bundle branch block (p-value 0.031) and mitral valve repair (p-value 0.032) were independent risk factor for PPM dependency at follow-up. Conclusions: More than 40% of patients with PPM implantation shortly after cardiac surgery show recovery of sinus rhythm at follow-up. Wide variability of strategies and PM implant timing are currently applied in routine practice. Refinement of current guidelines in this setting based also on predictors of permanent conduction defects postoperatively are warranted.

OBSERVANT represents the first national observational study on the comparative effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) vs surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) at short, medium and long term, in a patient population with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The aim of this paper is to describe patient characteristics and short-term outcomes of the enrolled population.OBSERVANT is an observational prospective multicenter cohort study that enrolled AS patients undergoing SAVR or TAVI from December 2010 to June 2012 in the participating hospitals. Information on demographic characteristics, health status prior to intervention, therapeutic approach, intraprocedural and 30-day outcomes was collected. An administrative follow-up was set up to collect data on long-term outcomes.The enrolled population included 7618 patients undergoing transfemoral/transubclavian TAVI (TF/TS-TAVI, n=1652), transapical TAVI (TA-TAVI, n=259) or SAVR (n=5707). SAVR patients were younger and with a lower risk profile than TAVI patients (logistic EuroSCORE: SAVR 6.4 ± 7.3%, TF/TS-TAVI 14.1 ± 12.1%, TA-TAVI 15.5 ± 11.0%; p0.001). When 30-day mortality rates were stratified by logistic EuroSCORE, a statistically significant difference was found only in the patient subgroup with logistic EuroSCORE ≤5% (SAVR 1.0%, TF/TS-TAVI 4.7%, TA-TAVI 0.0%; p=0.005).Findings from the OBSERVANT study confirm that patients undergoing TAVI are older and sicker than patients undergoing SAVR. Nevertheless, the logistic EuroSCORE shows that, in Italy, also patients at intermediate surgical risk are treated with TAVI. Stratifying by logistic EuroSCORE, SAVR seems to be superior to TAVI in the subgroup of patients at very low risk. More sophisticated analyses on patient subgroups with comparable risk profile and on long-term follow-up will allow to obtain valuable information on the effectiveness of TAVI and SAVR procedures.

EuroSCORE algorithms were developed to predict perioperative mortality in cardiac surgery. This study was designed to evaluate the reliability of EuroSCORE algorithms and to analyze the predicting role of the scoring system's factors on patients that undergo isolate AVR. 339 patients underwent aortic valve replacement. Data collection was prospective and the logistic and additive EuroSCORE algorithms were calculated according to published guidelines. The observed-over-expected mortality ratio was 0.096. In the ROC curve analysis, the asymptotic significance was greater than 0.05. On multivariate analysis, only critical preoperative state remained significant independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (Odds Ratio 1.6, CI 1.2–2.1). These outcomes suggest that EuroSCORE models may fail in predicting hospital mortality in subsets of cardiac surgery patients and dedicated risk models for isolate aortic valvular surgery may be useful to provide more precise estimates of hospital mortality.

Aortic stenosis (AS) is common in patients with end-stage renal disease and the rate of progression is faster than in patients without end-stage renal disease. While aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the gold-standard approach for patients with symptomatic severe AS, surgical AVR (SAVR) carries

Aims The European System for Cardiac Operation Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is widely used for predicting in-hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. A new score (EuroSCORE II) has been recently developed to update the previously released versions. This study was undertaken to validate EuroSCORE II, to compare its performance with the original EuroSCOREs and to evaluate the effects of the removal of those factors that were included in the score even if they were statistically non-significant.Methods and resultsData on 12 325 consecutive patients who underwent major cardiac surgery in a 6-year period were retrieved from three prospective institutional databases. Discriminatory power was assessed using the c-index and comparison among the scores' performances was performed with Delong, bootstrap, and Venkatraman methods. Calibration was evaluated with calibration curves and associated statistics.The in-hospital mortality rate was 2.2%. The discriminatory power was high and similar in all algorithms (area under the curve 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.84 for additive EuroSCORE; 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79-0.84 for logistic EuroSCORE; 0.82, 95% CI: 0.80-0.85 for EuroSCORE II). The EuroSCORE II had a fair calibration till 30%-predicted values and over-predicted beyond. The removal of non-significant factors from EuroSCORE II did not affect performance, being both the calibration and discrimination comparable. Conclusion This validation study demonstrated that EuroSCORE II is a good predictor of perioperative mortality. It showed an optimal calibration until 30%-predicted mortality. Nonetheless, it does not seem to significantly improve the performance of older versions in the higher tertiles of risk. Moreover, it could be simplified, as the removal from the algorithm of non-significant factors does not alter its performance. © 2012 The Author.

An 88-year-old man was admitted to our department for the evaluation of an asymptomatic pulsating haematoma of the left thoracic wall. He had undergone uneventful transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with transapical access 5 months earlier. At 3-month follow-up the echocardiography did

The comparison of hemodilution at the end of surgery is of limited use as it represents only a snapshot of a dynamic phenomenon. This study was undertaken to compare the perioperative hemoglobin curves of isolated coronary artery bypass grafting performed with minimized extracorporeal circulation, traditional cardiopulmonary bypass, and off-pump technique. The propensity score method was used to select three groups of patients, homogenous regarding preoperative and operative data, who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. A generalized linear mixed model was used for estimating differences in perioperative hemoglobin trends among groups. The three groups were each composed of 50 patients with no differences in demographic data, preoperative risk profile, preoperative hemoglobin, or type of surgery. There was no significant difference in major postoperative complications. The pattern of the hemodilution curves was similar in patients operated with mini-circuit and off-pump technique (P005). Mini-circuit led to a 3.1 ± 11.9% hemoglobin reduction, which was similar to the off-pump group (1.6 ± 8.9%, P = 0.99 at ANOVA) and significantly different from the standard extracorporeal circuit group (16.0 ± 10.3%, P0.001 at ANOVA). The generalized linear mixed model determined that the standard circuit was the only independent predictor for increased hemodilution. Its effect on hemodilution was time-dependent and the slope of the hemoglobin curve was more pronounced between systemic heparinization and the end of surgery. Perioperative hemoglobin trends of patients who underwent myocardial revascularization with mini-circuit were similar to those of off-pump surgery and significantly less pronounced than those of standard extracorporeal circulation.

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is an emerging alternative technique that has shown promise in the treatment of severe aortic stenosis in patient populations at high risk with conventional surgery. The presence of a bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) has been considered an exclusion criterion for TAVI, because of the presumed risk for poor seating or paravalvular regurgitation due to severe distortion of the native valve leaflets. For this reason, BAV disease has generally been an exclusion criterion in major trials of TAVI and there is little clinical experience available. We report a case of transcatheter valve replacement in a poor surgical candidate with BAV stenosis using a new 29 mm Edwards Sapien prosthesis.

Background The aim of the study is to design a specific Intensive Care Unit length-of-stay risk model based on the preoperative factors and surgeries utilizing modeling strategies for time-to-event data in a prospective observational clinical study. Methods From January 2004 to April 2011 data on 3861 consecutive heart surgery patients were prospectively collected. ICU length of stay was analyzed as a time-to-event variable in a competing risk framework with death as competing risk. Results The median ICU-LOS was one day. All factors considered but gender was included in the multivariable modeling. In the final model, factors that mostly affected time-to-discharge from ICU were critical preoperative state (Relative Risk 0.41; 95% Confidence Interval: 0.29–0.58), emergency (0.41; 0.32–0.53), poor left ventricular dysfunction (0.50; 0.44–0.57) and serum creatinine>200μmol/L (0.54; 0.46–0.65). Most of the predictors had a time-dependent effect that decreased in the first fifteen days and was constant thereafter. After the plateau, the risk profile was changed as most of the factors were no longer significant, Conversely, the time-to-ICU death model included only two variables, critical perioperative state and serum creatinine>200μmol/L, with a constant RR of 9.1 and 3.37 respectively. Conclusions ICU-LOS can be predicted by preoperative data and type of surgeries. The derived ICU-LOS prediction model is dynamic and most predictors have an effect that decreases with time. The algorithm can preoperatively predict ICU-LOS curves and could have a major role in the decision making-behavior of clinicians, resources' allocation and maximization of care for high-risk patients.

Background: The perioperative period has been an increasingly noticed and salient issue for both clinicians and institutions and especially length of stay in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU-LOS) after cardiac surgery. The aim of this study was to design a specific ICU-LOS risk model based on the euroSCORE preoperative factors utilizing modeling strategies for time-to-event data. Methods: From Jan '04 to Jan '10 data on 3263 consecutive heart surgery patients were prospectively collected. ICU length of stay was analyzed as a time-to-event variable in a competing risks framework with death as the competing risk. Covariate effect on the cumulative incidence function was modeled using pseudo-values from a jackknife of the non-parametric estimate of the crude cumulative incidence. Results: Median ICU-LOS was one day and the 3rd quartile was 2 days. All euroSCORE factors were included in the final reduced model except gender, post-infarct septal rupture, unstable angina and recent myocardial infarction due to lack of significance in the initial model. The relative risk (RR) of discharge ranged from 0.35 to 0.90. In the final model, critical preoperative state (RR 0.33), emergent operation (RR 0.35), left ventricular dysfunction (RR 0.42) and serum creatinine >200 μMol/L (RR 0.49) had the largest weight on ICU discharge probability. Effect of predictor was often time-dependent and RR tended to increase towards 1.0, reflecting a progressive reduction of their weight on ICU-LOS (figure). Conclusions: Most of the euroSCORE variables were demonstrated to be independent predictors of ICU-LOS and were used to develop a dynamic ICU prediction model through competing risks analysis.

We read with great interest the article by De Cocker and colleagues [1]. It deals with one of the hot topics in cardiac surgery, as the prediction of postoperative intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) can be a useful tool for quality control and for the planning of perioperative resources, reducing costs, and improving the standard of care. In our opinion, the novel issue of the article is the evaluation of ICU-LOS as a time-to-event variable. Previous studies have focused on ICU risk modeling but their common limitation was the dichotomizing of the continuous data nature of ICU-LOS [2]. To our knowledge, it is the first time that regression models for time-to-event data are employed for the prediction of ICU-LOS. Nonetheless, the article raises some methodological questions. The authors evaluated the predictors of time-to-ICU discharge and considered deaths in ICU as censored. This choice leads to an overestimation of the probability of the event in the naive Kaplan–Meier estimator, as the assumption of independence of the censoring distribution is violated [3]. ICU-LOS represents a classic example of time-to-event variable in a competing risk setting, where an individual can experience more than one type of event, named discharge and death, and the occurrence of one type of event hinders the occurrence of the other [4]. When competing risks are present, Kaplan–Meier estimates cannot be interpreted as probabilities and their complements can be interpreted as the probability of an event of representing an ideal world when the other types of events do not exist. A different approach based on the cumulative incidence function (CIF) is suggested. Consequently, the effects of covariates should be modeled not on the crude hazard rates but directly on the CIF, with methods that are alternative to the Cox analysis [5]. Moreover, by its nature, the Cox model estimates the effect of the covariate on the time-to-event but does not make any assumption on the baseline hazard. In our opinion, the goal of this model should be to simultaneously characterize both the basic underlying distribution of time-to-event and the distribution changes as a function of the covariates, namely error and systematic components, respectively. The baseline distribution reflects the ICU-discharge protocol employed in the ICU and can have high variations. No ICU discharge criteria were reported but a high percentage of the study population (43%) had an ICU-LOS >2 days. This large quote does not seem to be representative of the modern cardiac ICU and does not reflect the fast-track protocol that is nowadays employed in several cardiac ICUs. Hence, a more detailed analysis of the baseline ICU-LOS should be considered. In conclusion, if the methods utilized in this study were addressed in a rather refined fashion by focusing on competing risks and fully parametric algorithms, the results of this study could have had a far wider utility. Nevertheless, by the token that this study has pioneered the correct methodology for the analysis of ICU-LOS after cardiac surgery, it certainly is a valuable addition to the literature.

Severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (SSAS) is the most common acquired valvular heart disease in the western world, and its prevalence is strongly linked to the phenomenon of population ageing. After symptom onset, patients with SSAS, if untreated, show very poor prognoses, unavoidably reaching complete disability status with a significant reduction in survival. Although aortic valve replacement (AVR) is the definitive therapy for this kind of patients, a new, less-invasive alternative like transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has been considered, at least for a large proportion of patients with very high or prohibitive operative risks. OBSERVANT represents the first observational multicenter perspective study on the comparative effectiveness of TAVI, AVR, and medical therapy in the Italian population with SSAS.In the participating hospitals, to define the patient risk profile for each patient with SSAS, data on demographic characteristics, health status prior to intervention and presence of comorbidities will be collected. Moreover, complete information on the type of intervention will be gathered. Mortality within 30 days from intervention is the primary adverse outcome. Secondary outcomes include mortality within 12 and 24 months and the incidence of in-hospital major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Clinical monitoring procedures will allow assessment of the reliability and completeness of the database and help maintain constant quality control. To compare the effectiveness of AVR, TAVI, and medical treatment in terms of medium- and long-term outcomes, accounting for possible differences in patient case-mix among the three treatment groups, risk adjustment techniques will be applied.Short-, medium-, and long-term outcome in patients undergoing one of the three SSAS treatments; use, appropriateness, and economic and organizational impact of TAVI and AVR procedures; specific "indication criteria" to guarantee appropriate patient selection for AVR or TAVI; new pre-procedure risk score, specific for the elderly Italian population; guidelines on TAVI procedure coding and a system of administrative follow-up to be proposed to the regional health systems for managing the use of the AVR or TAVI procedures.The complete knowledge base derived from this study will be directly transferable to professionals and policy makers, giving them evidence-based results for use in their decision-making process.

Background and aim of the study: The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and mid-term off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery (OPCAB) results in a single surgical unit, assessing the impact of completeness of revascularization. Methods: Three hundred and twelve patients underwent OPCAB between August 2000 and January 2005. In-hospital data were collected prospectively for all patients un- dergoing OPCAB. Complete revascularization (CR) was derived by comparing significantly stenotic vessels at cardiac catheterization with surgically grafted coronary vessels. Grafting of all the significantly stenotic coronary vessels was considered CR. In-hospital outcomes were compared between patients with CR and incomplete revascularization (IR). A multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed. Results: Patients receiving IR (105 patients, 43.7%) presented a worse preoperative risk profile then those having CR (mean Euroscore 6.8 ± 2.9 vs. 4.3 ± 2.8, p < 0.0001). IR was not asso- ciated with a higher incidence of early adverse events. Five-year freedom from death and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were 0.88 (0.02 SE) and 0.86 (0.03 SE), respectively. Complete revascularization was protective for mid-term unstable angina recurrence (heart rate (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.10 to 0.58), acute myocardial infarction (HR = 0.25, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.73), all-cause repeat revascularization (HR = 0.35, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.90), and MACE (HR = 0.2, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.5). Conclusion: Our study suggests that, although incomplete revascularization may not result in increased short-term morbidity and mortal

We report the case of a 41-year-old man presenting with a large Kommerell's diverticulum aneurysm in the right-sided aortic arch with retroesophageal component and moderate thoracic aortic dilation. Surgical treatment was performed through left thoracotomy and consisted of aneurysmectomy, closure of the distal aortic arch defect and aorta-left subclavian artery bypass. After 2 years computed tomography showed no modifications in the thoracic aortic morphology and the patency of the graft to the subclavian artery.

A left Valsalva sinus-right atriocaval junction giant congenital fistula was diagnosed in a young man with recent bacterial endocarditis. Surgical closure of the fistula was performed to correct the left-to-right shunt, to reduce the risk of recurrence of endocarditis and to prevent aortic root distortion. Surgery was preferred to percutaneous treatment because of the perceived risk of coronary complications. The dimensions of the residual chamber connected with the aortic root appeared unchanged at the 1-year follow-up echocardiography. Simple closure, with no procedure on the proximal coronary tract of the fistula may offer an effective and definitive correction of giant fistulas.

The design of automotive control systems is becoming increasingly complex as the level of performance required by car manufactures grows continuously and the constraints on cost and development time imposed by the market become tighter. A successful design, without costly and time consuming re-design cycles, can be achieved only by using an efficient design methodology that allows for component re-use and evaluation of platform requirements at the early stages of the design flow. In this paper, we illustrate the application of an integrated control-implementation design methodology, recently proposed by our group, to the development of the top few layers of abstraction in the design flow of an engine control system for motorcycles.

✓ Seven patients with “isolated” traumatic intracerebellar hematomas due to closed head injuries are presented. Computerized tomography parameters useful in the correct management of these hematomas include: location (hemisphere or midline), size, and appearance of the posterior fossa cisterns (intact or obliterated). Three patients with hemispheric hematomas were treated conservatively and recovered. One patient with a midline hematoma was managed conservatively and died. Three hematomas (one hemispheric and two midline) were operated on. The immediate results of surgery were good, but two patients died later due to medical complications. The results of this study support the concept that large hematomas (3 cm or greater) generally need surgery and that hemispheric hematomas of limited size (less than 3 cm) may be treated conservatively. The clinical course and prognosis of midline hematomas is grave, and evacuation of accessible hematomas should be considered early in the course of the disease.