1. Delivery decision in pregnant women rescued by ECMO for severe ARDS: a retrospective multicenter cohort study
- Author
-
Sarah Aissi James, Christophe Guervilly, Mathieu Lesouhaitier, Alexandre Coppens, Clément Haddadi, Guillaume Lebreton, Jacky Nizard, Nicolas Brechot, Benjamin Assouline, Ouriel Saura, David Levy, Lucie Lefèvre, Pétra Barhoum, Juliette Chommeloux, Guillaume Hékimian, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Antoine Kimmoun, Alain Combes, Matthieu Schmidt, Institut de cardiologie [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière], CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Sorbonne Université (SU), Hôpital Nord [CHU - APHM], CHU Pontchaillou [Rennes], Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy), Institut Lorrain du Coeur et des Vaisseaux Louis Mathieu [Nancy], Défaillance Cardiovasculaire Aiguë et Chronique (DCAC), Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire de Nancy (CHRU Nancy)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Université de Lorraine (UL), Cardiovascular and Renal Clinical Trialists [Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy] (INI-CRCT), Unité de Recherche sur les Maladies Cardiovasculaires, du Métabolisme et de la Nutrition = Research Unit on Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases (ICAN), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Institut de Cardiométabolisme et Nutrition = Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition [CHU Pitié Salpêtrière] (IHU ICAN), Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière [AP-HP], Assistance publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP) (AP-HP)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Assistance aux Gestes et Applications THErapeutiques (AGATHE), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Institut des Systèmes Intelligents et de Robotique (ISIR), Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Sorbonne Université (SU)-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), REanimation et Soins intensifs du Patient en Insuffisance Respiratoire aigüE [CHU Pitié-Salpêtrière] (GRC RESPIRE), and gravez, basile
- Subjects
Respiratory Distress Syndrome ,Acute respiratory distress syndrome ,Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ,Pregnant women ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Infant, Newborn ,Outcomes ,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine ,Cohort Studies ,[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Pregnancy ,Humans ,Female ,Delivery ,Retrospective Studies - Abstract
Background Although rarely addressed in the literature, a key question in the care of critically pregnant women with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), especially at the time of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decision, is whether delivery might substantially improve the mother’s and child’s conditions. This multicenter, retrospective cohort aims to report maternal and fetal short- and long-term outcomes of pregnant women with ECMO-rescued severe ARDS according to the timing of the delivery decision taken before or after ECMO cannulation. Methods We included critically ill women with ongoing pregnancy or within 15 days after a maternal/child-rescue-aimed delivery supported by ECMO for a severe ARDS between October 2009 and August 2021 in four ECMO centers. Clinical characteristics, critical care management, complications, and hospital discharge status for both mothers and children were collected. Long-term outcomes and premature birth complications were assessed. Results Among 563 women on venovenous ECMO during the study period, 11 were cannulated during an ongoing pregnancy at a median (range) of 25 (21–29) gestational weeks, and 13 after an emergency delivery performed at 32 (17–39) weeks of gestation. Pre-ECMO PaO2/FiO2 ratio was 57 (26–98) and did not differ between the two groups. Patients on ECMO after delivery reported more major bleeding (46 vs. 18%, p = 0.05) than those with ongoing pregnancy. Overall, the maternal hospital survival was 88%, which was not different between the two groups. Four (36%) of pregnant women had a spontaneous expulsion on ECMO, and fetal survival was higher when ECMO was set after delivery (92% vs. 55%, p = 0.03). Among newborns alive, no severe preterm morbidity or long-term sequelae were reported. Conclusion Continuation of the pregnancy on ECMO support carries a significant risk of fetal death while improving prematurity-related morbidity in alive newborns with no difference in maternal outcomes. Decisions regarding timing, place, and mode of delivery should be taken and regularly (re)assess by a multidisciplinary team in experienced ECMO centers.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF