Search

Patients with cancer are at an increased risk of venous (VTE) and arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and thromboembolic events (TEs) represent the second-leading cause of death in cancer patients. The risk of cancer-associated thromboembolism is multifactorial. In addition to patient risk factors, anticancer treatments have been found to increase the risk of both VTE and ATE. Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has become a mainstay of treatment in various types of cancers. Their use is associated with the occurrence of a new spectrum of side effects called immune-related adverse events. Meta-analyses-including data from prospective and retrospective studies-and case reports both reported VTE and ATE as adverse events associated with ICB, with a cumulative incidence equaling around 3% and 1%, respectively. The exact mechanism underlying a TE after ICB use is currently unclear, as well as its associated risk factors. Considering their potential life-threatening impact, it is important for clinicians to be aware of the potential thrombotic complications, to educate patients and recognize early signs and symptoms of VTE and ATE, in order to allow prompt treatment (if needed) and avoid complications.

Breast cancer is still a lethal disease and the leading cause of death in women, undermining patients’ survival and quality of life. Modern techniques of surgery and radiotherapy allow for the obtaining of good results in terms of survival, however they cause long-term side effects that persist over time, such as lymphedema and neuropathy. Similarly, the advent of new therapies such as endocrine therapy revolutionized breast cancer outcomes, but side effects are still present even in years of follow-up after cure. Besides the side effects of medical and surgical therapy, breast cancer is a real disruption in patients’ lives considering quality of life-related aspects such as the distortion of body image, the psychological consequences of the diagnosis, and the impact on family dynamics. Therefore, the doctor-patient relationship is central to providing the best support both during treatment and afterwards. The aim of this review is to summarize the consequences of medical and surgical treatment on breast cancer patients and to emphasize the importance of early prevention of side effects to improve patients’ quality of life.

The current standard of care for resected early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who did not receive systemic preoperative therapy is adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy (CT). A network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (phase III) enrolling patients with resected stage I-III TNBC comparing adjuvant regimens was performed. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) data were extracted. A total of 27 phase III clinical trials were selected including 15,242 TNBC patients. This NMA showed an OS benefit from the incorporation of capecitabine into classic anthracycline/taxane-based combinations compared to anthracyclines with or without taxanes alone.

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth most common cancer. In locally advanced (LA) HNSCC, a multidisciplinary approach consisting of surgery followed by chemoradiation (CRT) or definitive CRT is the mainstay of treatment. In recurrent metastatic (R/M), HNSCC immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy represent the new first-line option. However, cancer will recur in about two out of five patients with LA HNSCC. If progression occurs within six months from platin-radiotherapy treatment, anti-programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) may be prescribed. Otherwise, immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy might be considered if PD-L1 is expressed. Despite several improvements in the outcome of patients with R/M HNSCC, overall survival (OS) remains dismal, equaling a median of 14 months. In-depth knowledge of the tumor microenvironment (TME) would be required to change the course of this complex disease. In recent years, many predictive and prognostic biomarkers have been studied in the HNSCC TME, but none of them alone can select the best candidates for response to ICIs or targeted therapy (e.g., Cetuximab). The presence of cytokines indicates an immune response that might occur, among other things, after tumor antigen recognition, viral and bacterial infection, and physic damage. An immune response against HNSCC results in the production of some cytokines that induce a pro-inflammatory response and attract cells, such as neutrophils, macrophages, and T cell effectors, to enhance the innate and adaptive anti-tumor response. We revised the role of a group of cytokines as biomarkers for treatment response in HNSCC.

Background The relative risk (RR) of infection for patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unknown. Objectives This study evaluated the risk of infection for patients with solid tumors undergoing ICI therapy based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Patients and Methods The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched up to 1 December 2020. Randomized trials comparing any ICI alone, with chemotherapy (CT), or with other agents versus placebo, CT, or other agents were included. Three independent reviewers extracted the data. The primary outcome was the RR of all-grade (G) and G3–5 infections for patients receiving ICI-based treatments. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to statistical heterogeneity. Results A total of 21,451 patients from N = 36 studies were eligible. ICIs were associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84–1.24; P = 0.85) versus non-ICI treatments (G1–5 events: 9.6 versus 8.3%). When the ICIs alone were compared to CT, their use was associated with 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4–0.85; P = 0.01). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.53; P < 0.01) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17–1.96; P < 0.01). In anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, anti-CTLA-4, monotherapy, and combination trials, the RR of all-grade infections was 0.72 (95% CI 0.49–1.05; P = 0.09), 1.18 (95% CI 0.95–1.46; P = 0.13), 1.74 (95% CI 1.13–2.67; P = 0.01), 0.97 (95% CI 0.79–1.19; P = 0.75) and 2.26 (95% CI 1.34–3.8; P

In the recent years characterized by the cancer immunotherapy revolution, attention has turned to how to potentially boost and/or generate an efficient anti-tumor immune response in breast cancer (BC). Clinical activity of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) targeting PD-1 or PD-L1 in BC has been more evident in the triple negative subtype and in earlier lines of the treatment. Remarkably, some responders to single agent ICB have achieved durable responses with metastatic disease, possibly as a result of treatment-induced immunological memory. However, most BC are immunologically quiescent and current research efforts developing ICB combinations are attempting to convert “cold” into “hot” tumors by manipulating the tumor microenvironment, expanding anti-tumor T cells improving efficient antigen presentation, and suppressing pro-tumor inhibitory cells. The aim of this review is to summarize existing data on the efficacy of immune checkpoint blockers as single agents and combination strategies in all BC subtypes, highlighting the BC subgroups that benefit most from ICB.

Hormone-receptor positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC) (including the luminal A and the luminal B subtypes) is the most common type of tumor in women diagnosed with early-stage BC (EBC). It represents a highly heterogeneous subgroup that is characterized by different risks of relapse. The aim of this review is to discuss the possible role played by the immune response in predicting this risk, along with the most common clinical and pathological factors and molecular tools that have been developed and are already in use. As opposed to what has previously been observed in the most aggressive human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) subtypes, a high proportion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)-reflecting a spontaneous and pre-existing immune response to the tumor-has been linked to a worse prognosis in HR+ EBC. This work provides some immune biological rationale explaining these findings and provides the basics to understand the principal clinical trials that are testing immunotherapy in HR+ (luminal) BC.

The immune system plays a fundamental role in neoplastic disease. In the era of immunotherapy, the adaptive immune response has been in the spotlight whereas the role of innate immunity in cancer development and progression is less known. The tumor microenvironment influences the terminal differentiation of innate immune cells, which can explicate their pro-tumor or anti-tumor effect. Different cells are able to recognize and eliminate no self and tumor cells: macrophages, natural killer cells, monocytes, dendritic cells, and neutrophils are, together with the elements of the complement system, the principal players of innate immunity in cancer development and evolution. Metastatic breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease from the stromal, immune, and biological point of view and requires deepened exploration to understand different patient outcomes. In this review, we summarize the evidence about the role of innate immunity in breast cancer metastatic sites and the potential targets for optimizing the innate response as a novel treatment opportunity.

Immunotherapy approaches boosting spontaneous and durable antitumor immune responses through immune checkpoint blockade are revolutionizing treatment and patient outcomes in solid tumors and hematological malignancies. Among the various inhibitory molecules employed by the immune system to regulate the adaptive immune responses, cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) is the first successfully targeted immune checkpoint molecule in the clinic, giving rise to significant but selective benefit either when targeted alone or in combination with anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibodies (Abs). However, the use of anti-CTLA-4 Abs was associated with the incidence of autoimmune-like adverse events (AEs), which were particularly frequent and severe with the use of combinational strategies. Nevertheless, the higher incidence of AEs is associated with an improved clinical benefit indicating treatment response. A prompt recognition of AEs followed by early and adequate treatment with immunosuppressive agents allows the management of these potentially serious AEs. This narrative review aims to summarize CTLA-4 biology, the rationale for the use as a companion for anti-PD-1 Abs in humans with results from the most relevant Phase III clinical trials including anti-CTLA-4 Abs in combination with anti-PD-1 Abs in solid tumors.

Graphical abstract Physiology and pathophysiology of pulmonary alveoli during SARS-CoV-2 infection. (A) COVID-19 severity: frequency of degrees of clinical manifestations in a Chinese cohort (>44.000 patients) (ref: Wu Z. et al, 2020). (B) Phases of COVID-19 disease and timing for the use of glucocorticoids. Legend: ARDS: Adult Respiratory Distress Syndrome; COVID-19: CoronaVirus Disease-19; MOF: multi-organ failure; pts: patients; SIRS: systemic inflammatory response syndrome., Highlights • Dexamethasone reduces the risk of death in patients critically ill with COVID-19. • No evidence of benefit from other complementary and/or supportive treatments was seen in critically ill COVID-19 hospitalized patients. • Synthetic glucocorticoids switch off cytokine storm, and consequent severe respiratory and multi-organ failures in patients with COVID-19. • Effects of synthetic glucocorticoids might be confounded by the contemporary use of other complementary drugs., The viral infection by SARS-CoV-2 has irrevocably altered the life of the majority of human beings, challenging national health systems worldwide, and pushing researchers to rapidly find adequate preventive and treatment strategies. No therapies have been shown effective with the exception of dexamethasone, a glucocorticoid that was recently proved to be the first life-saving drug in this disease. Remarkably, around 20 % of infected people develop a severe form of COVID-19, giving rise to respiratory and multi-organ failures requiring subintensive and intensive care interventions. This phenomenon is due to an excessive immune response that damages pulmonary alveoli, leading to a cytokine and chemokine storm with systemic effects. Indeed glucocorticoids’ role in regulating this immune response is controversial, and they have been used in clinical practice in a variety of countries, even without a previous clear consensus on their evidence-based benefit.

In the last decade, immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has changed the therapeutic algorithm of cancer patients. ICIs combined with other therapeutic options, such as chemo- and targeted therapies, generate impressive results in cancer patients. Locoregional treatments (LRTs) play an important role in the management of various solid tumors (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), neuroendocrine tumors, etc.), and this therapeutic approach may enhance the activity of the immune response to tumor cells destroying primary tumors and leading to the release of several soluble molecules. This systematic review was performed to identify studies reporting objective response rate (ORR) and survival information in patients with solid tumors treated with ICIs plus LRTs. In the present work, fourteen studies were included, and the majority of them (five studies) enrolled patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), whereas the others included patients with different diseases. The highest ORRs were seen in HCC (67%, Y-90 RE plus ipilimumab and nivolumab) and melanoma (38%, dendritic cells with mRNA plus ipilimumab) patients. ORRs were not observed in liver metastases from melanoma and colorectal cancer. These data suggest that combination of ICIs and LRTs is feasible and more active in primary tumors (particularly HCC) than metastases with a synergistic effect on antitumor immunity. However, further studies are needed to better select patients, schedules, and setting of treatments.

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor and its ligands physiologically regulate the activity of the adaptive immune system to limit excessive inflammatory processes, thus preventing normal tissue damage. Tumor cells escape from the host immune surveillance using this pathway, rendering it relevant therapeutic target. Despite the relevant clinical efficacy observed in patients with solid and hematological malignancies, the clinical benefit of these novel treatments is limited to a relatively restricted number of patients. A wide amount of genomic and immune related features is currently under investigation as potential predictive biomarkers for treatment selection. The results obtained so far are encouraging but still imperfect. Combination strategies using different immunotherapeutic agents or with other treatments (such as chemotherapy) are being investigated, showing promising but still not completely satisfactory results. This review aims to shed light on the main principles of targeting PD-1 in breast cancer, from biology through its functional and clinical implications.

Background Venous (VTEs) and arterial thromboembolic events (ATEs) are causes of morbidity, disability, mortality, and increase in treatment costs in cancer patients. The risk associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has not yet been clarified. The primary objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the incidence of VTEs and ATEs in patients treated with ICIs as single agents or in combination with other treatments. Material and methods Data from retrospective and prospective studies were selected from PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and The Cochrane Library from inception up to May up to 21st May 2020. All studies had to be in English and use human study participants. The studies were eligible if they provided a number (or rate) of VTEs and ATEs and the size of the population included. The PRISMA guidelines were followed. The data on the incidence of VTEs and ATEs were extracted for each arm, analyzed using random-effects models, and reported as weighted measures. Results A total of 20,273 patients from 68 studies were included (median follow-up ranged from a few months up to three years). Overall, there were 390 VTEs and 59 ATEs, with incidence rates of 2.7% (95%CI 1.8%–4%) and 1.1% (95%CI 0.5%–2.1%), respectively. The rate of pulmonary embolism was 1.6% (95%CI 0.7%–3.2%) and deep venous thrombosis was 2.7% (95%CI 1.4%–5.4%). In studies where ICIs were administered with chemotherapy, rates of VTEs were similar to ICI alone arms (2.8% vs 2.5%). The rate of stroke and myocardial infarction were 1.1% (95%CI 0.65%–1.45%) and 0.7% (95%CI 0.15%–1.15%), respectively. In randomized trials, compared with non-ICIs containing arms (e.g. chemotherapy), the relative risk (RR) of VTEs due to ICIs was similar (RR 1.08, 95%CI 0.6–1.9; P = .79). Conclusions Thromboembolic events associated with ICIs are relatively rare in cancer patients with an advanced stage of the disease. However, in randomized studies, their incidence is similar to control arms, suggesting that the contributory role of ICIs to the thromboembolic risk in many cancer settings is small.

The clinical utility of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is actively being investigated in breast cancer (BC). It is unclear whether TIL spatial location and organization in tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have an impact on prognosis. Additionally, the significance of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression is being debated due to conflicting data from several studies. We hypothesize that the presence, extent and spatial location of multiple immune biomarkers, reflecting ongoing immune responses, will be consistently associated with a good prognosis in highly infiltrated BC [triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2+]. The relationship between these immune biomarkers and clinical outcome was examined in the TNBC and HER2+ cohorts of node-positive BC patients enrolled in the BIG 02-98 adjuvant phase III trial with available material for immunohistochemical (IHC) labeling (N=113 and N=136, respectively). HER2+ patients did not receive trastuzumab. Dual IHC staining was performed on full-face consecutive tissue sections. Scoring was independently performed by two pathologists, blinded to the clinical data, and included: global, intratumoral and stromal TIL and TLS, assessed on CD3/CD20 slides; the percentage and location of PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, assessed on PD-1/PD-L1 slides. TIL were considered as a categorical variable with different cut-offs used for each parameter and for each cohort (TNBC and HER2+). Invasive disease-free survival (I-DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed (median follow-up: 10 years). Cox proportional hazard models were used for survival analyses. The TNBC cohort revealed an association between global TIL and outcome [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for I-DFS: 0.27 (0.15-0.51); OS: 0.26 (0.13-0.53)]. Similar results were observed for stromal and intratumoral TIL. PD-L1 expression within TLS was an independent predictor of OS, after adjustment for tumor size and age [HR: 0.30 (0.09-0.99)]. Multivariate analysis reveals this effect was principally driven by high stromal TIL (>17.5% based on CD3/CD20 assessment) (χ2 OS: p=0.009). In contrast, no significant prognostic associations were found in the overall HER2+ cohort. However high T cell TIL were associated with improved I-DFS and OS in the ER-/HER2+ group [I-DFS: 0.34 (0.14-0.80); OS: 0.32 (0.12-0.86)] and stromal TIL were associated with improved I-DFS in the ER+/HER2+ group [HR: 0.29 (0.09-0.94)] (univariate analyses). No significant associations between the number of TLS nor the expression of PD-1 with outcomes were observed in either cohorts. The presence of PD-L1+ TLS, driven by high baseline TIL, was associated with an excellent prognosis in node-positive TNBC. This observation might reflect specific immune activities taking place in these mini lymph node-like structures adjacent to the tumor bed where specific antitumor memory immune responses could be generated. No different prognostic impact was observed when analyzing TIL spatial location. Although the statistical power of the study might be limited, in line with previous findings our data reveal that, among the immune parameters evaluated, TIL are the strongest predictor of outcome in TNBC, while PD-L1+ TLS could be a new and important parameter that requires further investigation. Citation Format: Solinas C, de Wind A, Van den Eynden G, Ameye L, Garaud S, De Silva P, Boisson A, Noel G, Langouo Fontsa M, Buisseret L, de Azambuja E, Francis PA, Di Leo A, Crown JP, Sotiriou C, Larsimont D, Paesmans M, Piccart-Gebhart M, Willard-Gallo K. Immune parameters associated with survival in triple negative and HER2-positive breast cancer patients with 10 years of follow-up [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD5-09.

Background: FOXP1, a transcriptional regulator of lymphocyte development, is abnormally expressed in some human tumors. This study investigated FOXP1-mediated regulation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) in untreated primary breast cancer (BC). Methods: FOXP1 expression was analyzed in tissues from primary untreated breast tumors, BC cell lines and the METABRIC gene expression BC dataset. Cytokine and chemokine expression and lymphocyte migration in response to primary tumor supernatants (SN) was compared between FOXP1hi and FOXP1lo primary BC. Finding: FOXP1 expression was higher in estrogen receptor positive compared to negative BC. FOXP1hi tumors were significantly associated with lower TIL and fewer tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) compared to FOXP1lo BC. Silencing FOXP1 in BC cell lines positively impacted cytokine and chemokine expression with the inverse effect associated with overexpression. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL13, CX3CL, CCL20, IL2, IL21, GZMB and IFNG expression decreased while IL10 and TGFβ increased in FOXP1hi compared to FOXP1lo primary BC. Lymphocyte migration using primary BC supernatants detected decreased mobility toward FOXP1hi supernatants. FOXP1lo BC expresses higher levels of chemokines driving TIL migration. The METABRIC gene expression dataset analysis show FOXP1 expression is associated with unfavorable BC outcomes. Interpretation: These data identify FOXP1 as an important negative regulator of immune responses in BC via its regulation of cytokine and chemokine expression. Fund: Belgian Fund for Scientific Research (FNRS 3.4513.12F) and Opération Télévie (7.4636.13F and 7.4609.15F), Fonds J.C. Heuson and Fonds Lambeau-Marteaux., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Background: We hypothesized that non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with a tumor positive for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of the Excision Repair Cross Complementation Group 1 (ERCC-1) gene could be more genetically instable and consequently more responsive to a programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) blockade. Methods: We evaluated the T19007C and C8092A ERCC-1 SNPs by pyrosequencing assay, on tumor specimens from two independent cohorts of patients who relapsed after one or more prior systemic treatments for advanced NSCLC and who received nivolumab (3 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks) as part of the Italian Expanded Access Program. We aimed to assess the outcome of enrolled subjects according to the ERCC-1 SNPs status, to evaluate the role of these polymorphisms as putative biomarkers associated with a response/clinical benefit to anti-PD-1 therapies. Results: Of the 45 patients included in the final analysis, 21 (47%) and 16 (36%) were positive for the T19007C and C8092A polymorphic genotype (PG), respectively. In univariate analyses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were shorter in patients with the T19007C PG, but neither difference achieved statistical significance (P = 0.131 and P = 0.717, respectively). The presence of the C8092A PG was associated with a longer OS and PFS, although statistical significance was only reached for PFS (P = 0.112 and P = 0.025, respectively). These results were confirmed by multivariate analyses. The response rate was only significantly higher in patients with the C8092A PG vs. wild type ERCC-1 (62 vs. 7%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: Results from this hypothesis generating pilot study, provided suggestive evidence that a subgroup of NSCLC patients could benefit differently from nivolumab according to the C8092A ERCC-1 SNP status. However, these data warrant further investigation., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

The extent of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), along with immunomodulatory ligands, tumor-mutational burden and other biomarkers, has been demonstrated to be a marker of response to immune-checkpoint therapy in several cancers. Pathologists have therefore started to devise standardized visual approaches to quantify TILs for therapy prediction. However, despite successful standardization efforts visual TIL estimation is slow, with limited precision and lacks the ability to evaluate more complex properties such as TIL distribution patterns. Therefore, computational image analysis approaches are needed to provide standardized and efficient TIL quantification. Here, we discuss different automated TIL scoring approaches ranging from classical image segmentation, where cell boundaries are identified and the resulting objects classified according to shape properties, to machine learning-based approaches that directly classify cells without segmentation but rely on large amounts of training data. In contrast to conventional machine learning (ML) approaches that are often criticized for their “black-box” characteristics, we also discuss explainable machine learning. Such approaches render ML results interpretable and explain the computational decision-making process through high-resolution heatmaps that highlight TILs and cancer cells and therefore allow for quantification and plausibility checks in biomedical research and diagnostics., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Side effects of immune checkpoint blockade are often said to be infrequent and usually mild. The uniqueness of endocrine immune-related adverse events is their non-reversibility, with incidence and prevalence destined to increase in the coming years, particularly if immunotherapy is used at earlier stages of neoplastic disease. Immune-related hypophysitis is one of these observed endocrine adverse events. It is often difficult to diagnose, sometimes occurring without specific symptoms. It can lead to irreversibly altered functioning of diverse endocrine glands. Radiographically, the differential diagnosis of hypophysitis includes pituitary apoplexy and primary and secondary neoplastic lesions. Immune-related hypophysitis is most common with single-agent anti-CTLA-4, followed by the combination of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1, while occurs infrequently when anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents are administered alone. Hypophysitis with immune checkpoint blockade requires early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Patients can present with headache, visual disturbances or other endocrine-related syndromes or they can be asymptomatic. The manifestation of symptoms should prompt blood analysis and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain. Imaging is important to exclude secondary meningeal or parenchymal lesions. Management should include discontinuation of the immune checkpoint blockade, initiation of corticosteroid therapy and eventually hormone replacement therapy. Hypophysitis impacts treatment of the disease and usually requires long-term management of this irreversible side effect. A multidisciplinary team approach is merited to insure the correct diagnosis and management of immune-related hypophysitis.

Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment strategies used in cancer. Aside from the local control of the disease, which is mediated by a direct cytotoxic effect on tumor cells, radiotherapy has also been shown to exert immune-mediated local and systemic effects. Radiotherapy can elicit anti-tumor responses in distant sites from the radiation field; this phenomenon is known as the abscopal effect and has been described in patients previously treated with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). Considering that the efficacy of immunotherapy has been demonstrated only in a subset of patients-who often benefit with lasting responses-efforts are ongoing to potentiate its activity with the development of new combination strategies. Radiotherapy might represent a potential candidate for a synergistic combination with immunotherapy, by improving the immunogenicity of tumors and by enhancing local and systemic immune effects. This review aims to summarize the current pre-clinical and clinical data on the immune effects of radiotherapy and their potential implications for cancer immunotherapy.

Background A relationship between high baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and better outcomes has been described in early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Nevertheless, the magnitude of this association and whether this effect could differ based on the type of anti-HER2 agent administered remain controversial. This meta-analysis investigated the association between baseline TIL and pathologic complete response (pCR) rates in HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and lapatinib either alone or in combination. Methods A literature search covering PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane library up to October 31, 2016 identified randomized, controlled trials investigating neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and lapatinib either alone or in combination where published data for pCR based on pre-treatment TIL scores was available. Two subgroups were considered: high baseline TIL vs. non-high TIL, according to each study definition. Summary risk estimates (odds ratio) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for pCR using pre-treatment TIL levels for each trial. Pooled analyses were conducted using random and fixed effects models. Interaction P -values were computed using a Monte Carlo permutation test. Results A total of 5 studies ( N =1,256 patients) were included. Overall, high TIL subgroup was associated with a significantly increased pCR rate (OR 2.46; 95% CI 1.36-4.43; P =0.003). No interaction was observed between TIL subgroup (high vs. non-high TIL) and response to anti-HER2 agent(s) (trastuzumab vs. lapatinib vs. their combination; P =0.747) and chemotherapy (anthracycline and taxanes vs. taxanes only; P =0.201). A stronger association between high TIL subgroup and pCR rate was observed when examining only the 4 studies using neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane- based chemotherapy and the 60% cut-off for high TIL ( N =869, NeoALTTO excluded) with an OR of 2.88 (95% CI 2.03-4.08; P Conclusions In HER2-positive breast cancer, high baseline TIL are associated with increased pCR probability irrespective of anti-HER2 agent(s) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen used.

The immunotherapy revolution in cancer treatment involves a variety of specialists, not only oncologists, but also internal medicine physicians, endocrinologists, dermatologists, gastroenterologists, rheumatologists, and radiologists, introducing new scenarios and novel challenges in the diagnosis and management of a number of novel immune-related adverse events. Among these, immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury has been described (occurring in up to 4% of patients) and has been reported to be responsible for visits to the emergency departments in up to 1.9% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This side effect can be symptomatic or non-symptomatic, and can be associated with the development of long-term damage to the pancreas, requiring the involvement of different specialists, including radiologists and gastroenterologists in the multidisciplinary team that manages these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to provide a summary of the available literature related to immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced pancreatic injury including the epidemiology, the clinical findings, and the management algorithm for diagnosis with a detailed analysis of the differential diagnosis at imaging, and treatment. A more in-depth focus is dedicated to symptomatic acute pancreatitis with its peculiar findings at imaging (ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging).

Tumor-infiltrating B-cells (TIL-B) in breast cancer (BC) have previously been associated with improved clinical outcomes; however, their role(s) in tumor immunity is not currently well known. This study confirms and extends the correlation between higher TIL-B densities and positive outcomes through an analysis of HER2-positive and triple-negative BC patients from the BIG 02-98 clinical trial (10yr mean follow-up). Fresh tissue analyses identify an increase in TIL-B density in untreated primary BC compared to normal breast tissues, which is associated with global, CD4+ and CD8+ TIL, higher tumor grades, higher proliferation and hormone receptor negativity. All B-cell differentiation stages are detectable but significant increases in memory TIL-B are consistently present. BC with higher infiltrates are specifically characterized by germinal center TIL-B, which in turn are correlated with TFH TIL and antibody-secreting TIL-B principally located in tertiary lymphoid structures. Some TIL-B also interact directly with tumor cells. Functional analyses reveal TIL-B are responsive to BCR stimulation ex vivo, express activation markers and produce cytokines and immunoglobulins despite reduced expression of the antigen-presenting molecules HLA-DR and CD40. Overall, these data support the concept that ongoing humoral immune responses are generated by TIL-B and help to generate effective anti-tumor immunity at the tumor site. ispartof: JCI INSIGHT vol:4 issue:18 ispartof: location:United States status: published

The programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) pathway is an important regulator of immune responses in peripheral tissues, including abnormal situations such as the tumor microenvironment. This pathway is currently the principal target for immunotherapeutic compounds designed to block immune checkpoint pathways, with these drugs improving clinical outcomes in a number of solid and hematological tumors. Medical oncology is experiencing an immune revolution that has scientists and clinicians looking at alternative, non-redundant inhibitory pathways also involved in regulating immune responses in cancer. A variety of targets have emerged for combinatorial approaches in immune checkpoint blockade. The main purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the biological role of lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3), an emerging targetable inhibitory immune checkpoint molecule. We briefly discuss its role in infection, autoimmune disease and cancer, with a more detailed analysis of current data on LAG3 expression in breast cancer. Current clinical trials testing soluble LAG3 immunoglobulin and LAG3 antagonists are also presented in this work., SCOPUS: ar.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

Inducible T cell costimulator (ICOS, cluster of differentiation (CD278)) is an activating costimulatory immune checkpoint expressed on activated T cells. Its ligand, ICOSL is expressed on antigen-presenting cells and somatic cells, including tumour cells in the tumour microenvironment. ICOS and ICOSL expression is linked to the release of soluble factors (cytokines), induced by activation of the immune response. ICOS and ICOSL binding generates various activities among the diversity of T cell subpopulations, including T cell activation and effector functions and when sustained also suppressive activities mediated by regulatory T cells. This dual role in both antitumour and protumour activities makes targeting the ICOS/ICOSL pathway attractive for enhancement of antitumour immune responses. This review summarises the biological background and rationale for targeting ICOS/ICOSL in cancer together with an overview of the principal ongoing clinical trials that are testing it in combination with anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 and anti-programmed cell death-1 or anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 based immune checkpoint blockade., SCOPUS: re.j, info:eu-repo/semantics/published

2637 Background: Febrile neutropenia and infections are well studied complications of chemotherapy (CT) and some targeted agents employed in oncology. Less is known about the risk of infection associated with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in cancer patients. The present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to address this question in patients diagnosed with solid tumors enrolled in randomized trials employing ICIs as experimental treatment. Methods: The Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Pubmed databases were searched from inception through December 1st, 2020. Randomized clinical trials comparing any ICI alone, with CT, or with other agents vs CT, placebo, or other agents in patients with solid tumors were included. Two independent reviewers used a standardized data extraction and quality assessment form. Discordant cases were discussed with a third independent investigator. The following information was extracted: baseline study characteristics, including the primary tumor, author, year of publication, type of trial, type of disease, and the type of therapy (experimental and control arms); and the incidence of any-grade (grades [G] 1–5), low-grade (G1–2), and high-grade (G3–4), fatal event (G5) infections, and type of event. Random or fixed-effect models were used according to the statistical heterogeneity. Results: 36 randomized clinical trials were deemed eligible. The total population reached 21451 patients. In the pooled analysis, the use of ICIs was associated with a similar risk of all-grade infections (relative risk, RR = 1.02; 95% CI 0.84–1.24; P = 0.85) compared to non-ICI treatments (G1-5 events: 9.6 vs. 8.3%). When the ICIs alone arms were compared to CT, the experimental arms were associated with a 42% less risk of all-grade infections (RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.4–0.85; P = 0.01; N = 18 studies). Compared to CT, the combination of ICIs and CT increased the risk of all-grade infections (RR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.23–1.53; P < 0.01; N = 13 studies) and severe infections (RR = 1.52, 95% CI 1.17–1.96; P < 0.01; N = 12 studies). Fatal infections were similar in the experimental and control arms (0.5%). Conclusions: In patients with advanced solid tumors, when ICIs were administered with CT, the risk of all-grade and G3-5 infections was significantly increased. Compared to CT alone, ICIs were safer and their use should be recommended for frail patients. Further studies are required to identify high-risk patients and evaluate the need for CT dose reduction or prophylactic myeloid growth factors use.

Simple Summary This work aims to discuss how an anti- or pro-tumor immune response could be manipulated through immune checkpoint blockade in patients with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. By summarizing previously published evidence in the field, authors present their personal view on how immune checkpoint blockade could be implemented in the neoadjuvant setting in this patient population. The hypothesis being presented is that an appropriate and effective administration of immune checkpoint blockade could assure a lasting control of the disease, by preventing relapses. One of the research priorities should be the identification of the patients who could benefit more by this strategy. Abstract The present commentary synthesizes the current evidence on the role of the immune response in HER2-positive breast cancer. It points out the strengths and weaknesses of the findings observed so far, particularly in the early setting, including the clinical significance of scoring tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. A figure proposing research hypotheses for the implementation of immune checkpoint blockade use for patient candidates to neoadjuvant treatment is presented.

Chronic inflammation following infections, autoimmune diseases or exposure to environmental irritants plays a crucial role in tumor development and influences the host immune response to neoplastic cells. The presence of an anti-tumor immune infiltrate is often associated with better outcomes in gastro-intestinal primary cancers, particularly in those with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H). Immunotherapeutic drugs inhibiting the PD-1 and PD-L1 pathway showed promising results in the treatment of these patients in the metastatic setting. The aim of this review is to resume the role tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play in gastrointestinal tumors, underlining their potential value as a prognostic and predictive biomarker. TILs assessment could identify subsets of patients with high extent of TILs and better prognosis, that could be spared from adjuvant systemic treatments. Immune infiltration parameters might be additional predictors of a greater benefit from the immunotherapy with the immune checkpoint blockade.

Anti-HER2 targeted therapy is one of the key advances in the treatment of breast cancer that have occurred in the last 20 years. In the adjuvant setting, the use of trastuzumab has led to prolonged and sustained survival benefit with very little toxicity as also confirmed by the 10-year follow-up results from the pivotal trials. Despite the survival improvement, several key issues are not entirely resolved in this field. These issues have led to multiple research efforts in de-escalating or escalating the standard treatment with chemotherapy and 1 year of adjuvant trastuzumab. Areas covered: In this paper, we present an in depth overview on the state of the art on these key issues of refining decision-making in adjuvant anti-HER2 therapy. Expert commentary: Despite many important research efforts in the field, chemotherapy plus trastuzumab for a total duration of 1 year remains the standard of care. However, recent data showed that besides standard anthracycline- and taxane-based cytotoxic therapy, alternative chemotherapy regimens can now be proposed to patients with small tumors without nodal involvement and to women at high-risk of developing cardiotoxicity. Of note, besides HER2 itself, biomarkers predicting patients who may truly benefit from anti-HER2 agents are still lacking.

In recent years the concept of precision medicine has become a popular topic particularly in medical oncology. Besides the identification of new molecular prognostic and predictive biomarkers and the development of new targeted and immunotherapeutic drugs, imaging has started to play a central role in this new era. Terms such as "radiomics", "radiogenomics" or "radi…-omics" are becoming increasingly common in the literature and soon they will represent an integral part of clinical practice. The use of artificial intelligence, imaging and "-omics" data can be used to develop models able to predict, for example, the features of the tumor immune microenvironment through imaging, and to monitor the therapeutic response beyond the standard radiological criteria. The aims of this narrative review are to provide a simplified guide for clinicians to these concepts, and to summarize the existing evidence on radiomics and "radi…-omics" in cancer immunotherapy.

There is a growing interest in active immune responses generated by tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) arising in solid tumors; however, their clinical impact in breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Several studies show that transcription factors contribute to TLS formation via their regulation of cytokine and chemokine production. The Forkhead box (FOX) protein 1 (FOXP1) has been shown to play critical roles in regulating immune cells, including our recent work revealing its effects on TIL migration. These data lead us to further investigate FOXP1 expression in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and TLS. We identify two types of TLS based on FOXP1 expression: 1) those that contain a germinal center (GC+) and those that do not (GC-). Comparative analysis of FOXP1 expression in secondary lymphoid organs, including more immune active tonsils (many GC) and less immune active spleens (primarily without GC) confirm differences in FOXP1 expression associated with GC. In BC, TLS containing tumors were more frequently GC- than GC+ (n=49), with triple-negative tumors having higher numbers of GC+ TLS compared to luminal or HER2+ tumors. Immunofluorescence and multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to closely examine the GC+ and GC- TLS, finding an immune active profile in the former, characterized by T follicular helper cells (PD1+CD4+ T), mature dendritic cells (CD21+ and CD23+), actively proliferating (Ki67+) B cells undergoing immunoglobulin (Ig) class switch recombination (AID+) and a plasma cell presence (CD138+). Analysis of Ig's in the primary tumor supernatants revealed that BC with ≥1 GC+ TLS (n=20) were characterized by increases in total Ig, IgG1, IgG2 and IgA, reflecting active humoral immunity, compared to BC containing only GC- TLS (n=29). Gene expression analysis of individual micro-dissected TLS demonstrated upregulation of Th1, Th2 and Tfh immune genes in the GC+ compared to the GC- TLS, suggesting the former also sustain cell-mediated immune responses. Immune infiltrates in tumors with ≥1 GC+ TLS are specifically characterized by high global TIL, CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+ T cell TIL and CD20+ TIL-B (n=29). Analysis of BC TIL spatial distribution identified increased stromal TIL (all subpopulations) while intratumoral TIL increases were predominantly CD3+ and CD8+ T cell TIL in tumors with GC+ TLS. Overall, our data indicate that GC+ TLS house active immune responses in BC while GC- TLS are quiescent. Citation Format: Pushpamali De Silva, Soizic Garaud, Cinzia Solinas, Grégory Noël, Mireille Langouo Fontsa, Anaïs Boisson, Alexandre de Wind, Vinu Jose, Gert Van den Eynden, Noemie Thomas, Hugues Duvillier, Céline Naveaux, Ligia Craciun, Dominique Bron, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Denis Larsimont, Karen Willard-Gallo. The anti-tumor immune responses by active and quiescent tertiary lymphoid structures to breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 3853.

The ability of cancer immunotherapy to generate lasting responses in a broad spectrum of tumors has generated great enthusiasm in medical oncology. A number of new immune-based compounds have now been approved based on the recent success of immune checkpoint blockade, either administered as monotherapy or in combination with other agents. Because clinical activity is limited only to subsets of patients, two major goals of cancer immunotherapy are (1) to reliably identify responders to these current treatments, and (2) to increase the number of patients who can respond to immunotherapy by developing new strategies. These goals are critically important since the hallmark of immune-based therapies is the induction of durable immunologic and clinical responses that result in overall survival benefit. Innovative combination strategies have great potential for bringing the benefit of immunotherapy to more patients. The use of cancer vaccines to actively induce immune effectors together with other drugs, which may include immune checkpoint blockade, chemotherapy, and/or molecularly targeted agents, is a particularly attractive strategy. Cancer vaccines have been tested both to prevent or intercept the development of cancer, and to decrease established tumor burdens. No vaccine has yet been approved for either breast cancer treatment or prevention. Here, we review the history of breast cancer vaccine development, and highlight near-term opportunities for moving forward.

Interest is growing in active immune responses generated by tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) arising in solid tumors; however, their clinical impact in breast cancer (BC) remains unclear. Several studies show that transcription factors contribute to TLS formation via their regulation of cytokine and chemokine production. The Forkhead box (FOX) protein 1 (FOXP1) has been shown to play critical roles in regulating immune cells, including our recent work revealing its effects on TIL migration. These data lead us to further investigate FOXP1 expression in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and TLS. We identify two types of TLS based on FOXP1 expression: 1) those that contain a germinal center (GC+) and those that do not (GC-). Comparative analysis of FOXP1 expression in secondary lymphoid organs, including more immune active tonsils (many GC) and less immune active spleens (primarily without GC), confirms differences in FOXP1 expression associated with GC. In BC, TLS-containing tumors were more frequently GC- than GC+ (n=49), with triple-negative tumors having higher numbers of GC+ TLS compared to luminal or HER2+ tumors. Immunofluorescence and multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to closely examine the GC+ and GC- TLS, finding an immune active profile in the former, characterized by T follicular helper cells (PD1+CD4+ T), mature dendritic cells (CD21+ and CD23+), actively proliferating (Ki67+) B cells undergoing immunoglobulin (Ig) class switch recombination (AID+) and a plasma cell presence (CD138+). Analysis of Igs in primary tumor supernatants revealed that BC with ≥1 GC+ TLS (n=20) were characterized by increases in total Ig, IgG1, IgG2, and IgA, reflecting active humoral immunity, compared to BC containing only GC- TLS (n=29). Gene expression analysis of individual microdissected TLS demonstrated upregulation of Th1, Th2, and Tfh immune genes in the GC+ compared to the GC- TLS, suggesting the former also sustain cell-mediated immune responses. Immune infiltrates in tumors with ≥1 GC+ TLS are specifically characterized by high global TIL, CD3+, CD4+ or CD8+ T cell TIL and CD20+ TIL-B (n=29). Analysis of BC TIL spatial distribution identified increased stromal TIL (all subpopulations) while intratumoral TIL increases were predominantly CD3+ and CD8+ T cell TIL in tumors with GC+ TLS. Overall, our data indicate that GC+ TLS house active immune responses in BC while GC- TLS are quiescent. This abstract is also being presented as Poster B99. Citation Format: Pushpamali De Silva, Soizic Garaud, Cinzia Solinas, Grégory Noël, Mireille Langouo Fontsa, Anaïs Boisson, Alexandre de Wind, David Venet, Gert Van den Eynden, Hugues Duvillier, Céline Naveaux, Ligia Craciun, Dominique Bron, Martine Piccart-Gebhart, Denis Larsimont, Karen Willard-Gallo. Active and quiescent tertiary lymphoid structures, differentiated using FOXP1 expression, play a role in immunity to breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2019 Nov 17-20; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2020;8(3 Suppl):Abstract nr PR10.

Targeting inhibitory immune checkpoint molecules has dramatically changed treatment paradigms in medical oncology. Understanding the best strategies to unleash a pre-existing immune response or to induce an efficient immune response against tumors has emerged as a research priority. In this work, we focus on a novel target for cancer immunotherapy, the inhibitory receptor T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM3). This narrative review describes TIM3 biology in different (tumor-infiltrating) immune cells, particularly in the immunosuppressive regulatory T cells and dysfunctional/exhausted cytotoxic T lymphocytes, but also in cells that confer innate immunity – natural killer and dendritic cells. We discuss the functional role of TIM3, its expression and its clinical significance in a variety of tumors, and confront the heterogeneous results emerging from different studies, including clinical trials of immunotherapy. Finally, this work summarizes the principal early-phase clinical trials exploring TIM3 blockade and discusses some future perspectives.

This study investigated the prevalence of TIL subpopulations, TLS, PD-1 and PD-L1 in tumors from TNBC patients harboring wild-type or mutated BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline genes. This TNBC cohort included 85% TIL-positive (≥10%) tumors with 21% classified as TILhi (≥50%). Interestingly, the BRCAmut group had a significantly higher incidence of TILpos tumors compared to the BRCAwt group (P = 0.037). T cells were dominant in the infiltrate but no statistically significant differences were detected between BRCAwt and BRCAmut for CD3+, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells or CD20+ B cells. TLS were detected in 74% of tumors but again no significant differences between the BRCA groups. PD-1 expression was observed in 33% and PD-L1 in 53% (any cell, cut-off ≥1%) tumors for the entire TNBC cohort. PD-1 expression correlated with PD-L1 and both with TIL and TLS but was not associated with BRCA mutational status. Our analyses reveal that BRCAwt and BRCAmut TNBC are similar except for a significant increase of TILpos tumors in the BRCAmut group. While BRCA gene mutations may not directly drive immune infiltration, the greater number of TILpos tumors could signal greater immunogenicity in this group.

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have been detected in several types of human solid tumors. These structures are thought to regulate local adaptive immune responses that can promote or antagonize tumor progression. Despite positive prognostic values associated with a TLS presence in several studies, discrepancies still exist. TLS are structurally organized entities composed of varying numbers of multiple cell types making their assessment in tumor tissues, particularly biopsies, challenging. Immunohistochemical staining of TLS-related cell populations is the most frequently used method for identifying and scoring them; however, TLS-related gene expression has also been explored. The protocols described are detailed to allow the user to quantify TLS-related gene expression on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human breast tumor tissues.

The remarkable responses observed in metastatic cancer patients treated with immunotherapies, including inhibitors directed to the PD-1 and PD-L1 checkpoint molecules, makes it a priority to identify critical variations in pro- and anti-tumor immune responses in breast cancer (BC). In patients with triple negative (TN) BC, an increased presence of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have been associated with good clinical outcomes. However, the frequency of specific lymphocyte subpopulations, PD-1 and/or PD-L1 expression and their prognostic significance remains an open question. Our recent work found that PD-1 and PD-L1 expression are specifically associated with higher TIL densities and an increased number of TLS in BC. We further demonstrated that TIL density, TLS and PD-L1 expression were correlated with more aggressive breast tumor characteristics, including higher proliferation and hormone receptor negativity. In this project, we examined the prevalence of TIL, TLS, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression in TNBC and further compared these immune parameters between TNBC patients harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline gene mutations with those carrying the wild-type (wt) genes. A total of 1402 BC patients whose blood was genetically tested for germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were examined for inclusion in this study. Ninety-eight chemotherapy-naïve patients with primary invasive ER–, PR– and HER2– BC and demonstrated germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 wt or mutated-gene status were included in this study. Ninety-four tumors were determined to be suitable for evaluating immune cell infiltration (51 BRCA wt and 43 BRCA-mutated). FFPE tumor tissue from the surgical specimens was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining of full-face tissue sections. IHC was performed as a dual label using CD3 plus CD20 for T and B cells, CD4 plus CD8 for the major T cell subpopulations and PD-1 plus PD-L1 for individual or paired expression of these receptors. The stained slides were independently scored by two experienced pathologists for TIL, TIL subpopulations, TLS and checkpoint molecule expression. These analyses revealed that 87% of our TNBC cohort was TIL-positive (≥10% TIL) with 35% classified as lymphocyte predominant BC (LPBC; ≥50% TIL). T cells were the principal component of the lymphocytic infiltrate with no significant differences between the BRCA wt and BRCA-mutated groups detected in total T cells (CD3+), helper T cells (CD4+), cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) or B cells (CD20+). TLS were identified in 73% of tumors with again no significant differences between the BRCA groups. Examination of checkpoint molecule expression identified 33% tumors as PD-1 positive and 40% as PD-L1 positive. PD-1 expression was correlated with PD-L1 expression and both with TIL positivity and the level of immune infiltration but not BRCA mutational status. Overall, our analyses revealed that BRCA wt and BRCA-mutated TNBC are remarkably similar in terms of TIL heterogeneity, a TLS presence and checkpoint molecule expression. These data suggest that BRCA gene mutations are not immunogenic nor do they directly drive immune infiltration in TNBC. Citation Format: Willard-Gallo K, Solinas C, Marcoux D, t'Kint de Roodenbeke D, Garaud S, Van den Eynden G, de Wind A, Boisson A, Larsimont D, Piccart M. BRCA gene mutations do not shape the extent and organization of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-04-04.

Tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) have been detected in several types of human solid tumors. These structures are thought to regulate local adaptive immune responses that can promote or antagonize tumor progression. Despite positive prognostic values associated with a TLS presence in several studies, discrepancies still exist. TLS are structurally organized entities composed of varying numbers of multiple cell types making their assessment in tumor tissues, particularly biopsies, challenging. Immunohistochemical staining of TLS-related cell populations is the most frequently used method for identifying and scoring them; however, TLS-related gene expression has also been explored. The protocols described are detailed to allow the user to quantify TLS-related gene expression on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human breast tumor tissues.

Assessment of the immune response to tumors is growing in importance as the prognostic implications of this response are increasingly recognized, and as immunotherapies are evaluated and implemented in different tumor types. However, many different approaches can be used to assess and describe the immune response, which limits efforts at implementation as a routine clinical biomarker. In part 1 of this review, we have proposed a standardized methodology to assess tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in solid tumors, based on the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarkers Working Group guidelines for invasive breast carcinoma. In part 2 of this review, we discuss the available evidence for the prognostic and predictive value of TILs in common solid tumors, including carcinomas of the lung, gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary system, gynecological system, and head and neck, as well as primary brain tumors, mesothelioma and melanoma. The particularities and different emphases in TIL assessment in different tumor types are discussed. The standardized methodology we propose can be adapted to different tumor types and may be used as a standard against which other approaches can be compared. Standardization of TIL assessment will help clinicians, researchers and pathologists to conclusively evaluate the utility of this simple biomarker in the current era of immunotherapy.

Manipulating an individual's immune system through immune checkpoint blockade is revolutionizing the paradigms of cancer treatment. Peculiar patterns and kinetics of response have been observed with these new drugs, rendering the assessment of tumor burden particularly challenging in cancer immunotherapy. The mechanisms of action for immune checkpoint blockade, based upon engagement of the adaptive immune system, can generate unusual response patterns, including pseudoprogression, hyperprogression, atypical and delayed responses. In patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade and radiotherapy, a reduction in tumor burden at metastatic sites distant from the irradiation field (abscopal effect) has been observed, with synergistic systemic immune effects provoked by this combination. New toxicities have also been observed, due to excessive immune activity in several organs, including lung, colon, liver and endocrine glands. Efforts to standardize assessment of cancer immunotherapy responses include novel consensus guidelines derived by modifying World Health Organization (WHO) and Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria. The aim of this review is to evaluate imaging techniques currently used routinely in the clinic and those being used as investigational tools in immunotherapy clinical trials.

The recent success of the immune checkpoint blockade in cancer immunotherapy has modified the treatment algorithms in a variety of aggressive neoplastic diseases. Nevertheless, optimal selection of ideal candidates to these drugs remains a challenge. The presence, location and composition of a pre-existing tumor immune infiltrate seem to impact on the benefit from these treatments. The association between the presence of baseline tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and patients' outcomes has been widely investigated in breast cancer, although immunotherapeutic strategies have historically been less successful with respect to other neoplastic diseases such as melanoma and kidney cancer. TIL extent varies and has different associations with outcomes in the various breast cancer subtypes. Furthermore, the presence of baseline high TIL has been associated with an increased benefit from some chemotherapeutic and targeted agents even though some conflicting results have been observed on this regard. This review aims to summarize the state of the art of TIL in breast cancer with a focus on their assessment, prevalence and clinical implications in the different subtypes.