6 results on '"Butler, Amy H."'
Search Results
2. The Climate-system Historical Forecast Project: Do stratosphere-resolving models make better seasonal climate predictions in boreal winter?
- Author
-
Butler, Amy H., Arribas, Alberto, Athanassiadou, Maria, Baehr, Johanna, Calvo, Natalia, Charlton-Perez, Andrew, Deque, Michel, Domeisen, Daniela I.V., Fröhlich, Kristina, Hendon, Harry, Imada, Yukiko, Ishii, Masayoshi, Iza, Maddalen, Karpechko, Alexey Yu., Kumar, Arun, MacLachlan, Craig, Merryfield, William J., Müller, Wolfgang A., O'Neill, Alan, Scaife, Adam A., Scinocca, John, Sigmond, Michael, Stockdale, Timothy N., and Yasuda, Tamaki
- Abstract
Using an international, multi-model suite of historical forecasts from the World Climate Research Programme (WCRP) Climate-system Historical Forecast Project (CHFP), we compare the seasonal prediction skill in boreal wintertime between models that resolve the stratosphere and its dynamics (“high-top”) and models that do not (“low-top”). We evaluate hindcasts that are initialized in November, and examine the model biases in the stratosphere and how they relate to boreal wintertime (Dec-Mar) seasonal forecast skill. We are unable to detect more skill in the high-top ensemble-mean than the low-top ensemble-mean in forecasting the wintertime North Atlantic Oscillation, but model performance varies widely. Increasing the ensemble size clearly increases the skill for a given model. We then examine two major processes involving stratosphere-troposphere interactions (the El Niño-Southern Oscillation/ENSO and the Quasi-biennial Oscillation/QBO) and how they relate to predictive skill on intra-seasonal to seasonal timescales, particularly over the North Atlantic and Eurasia regions. High-top models tend to have a more realistic stratospheric response to El Niño and the QBO compared to low-top models. Enhanced conditional wintertime skill over high-latitudes and the North Atlantic region during winters with El Niño conditions suggests a possible role for a stratospheric pathway.
- Published
- 2016
3. Separating the stratospheric and tropospheric pathways of El Niño–Southern Oscillation teleconnections
- Author
-
Butler, Amy H., Polvani, Lorenzo M., and Deser, Claira
- Subjects
Atmospheric circulation ,Stratospheric circulation ,Meteorology ,Atmosphere ,Atmosphere, Upper ,Winter ,Tropospheric circulation ,Climatic changes ,Air masses - Abstract
The El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a major driver of Northern Hemisphere wintertime variability and, generally, the key ingredient used in seasonal forecasts of wintertime surface climate. Modeling studies have recently suggested that ENSO teleconnections might involve both a tropospheric pathway and a stratospheric one. Here, using reanalysis data, we carefully distinguish between the two. We first note that the temperature and circulation anomalies associated with the tropospheric pathway are nearly equal and opposite during the warm (El Niño) and cold (La Niña) phases of ENSO, whereas those associated with the stratospheric pathway are of the same sign, irrespective of the ENSO phase. We then exploit this fact to isolate the two pathways. Our decomposition reveals that ENSOs climate impacts over North America are largely associated with the tropospheric pathway, whereas ENSOs climate impacts over the North Atlantic and Eurasia are greatly affected by the stratospheric pathway. The stratospheric pathway, which we here define on the basis of the occurrence of one or more sudden stratospheric warmings in a given winter, and whose signature projects very strongly on the North Atlantic Oscillation, is found to be present 60% of the time during ENSO winters (of either phase): it therefore likely plays an important role in improving seasonal forecasts, notably over the North Atlantic and the Eurasian continent.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Agreement in late twentieth century Southern Hemisphere stratospheric temperature trends in observations and CCMVal-2, CMIP3, and CMIP5 models
- Author
-
Young, Paul J., Butler, Amy H., Calvo Fernández, Natalia, Haimberger, Leopold, Kushner, Paul J., Marsh, Daniel R., Randel, William J., and Rosenlof, Karen H.
- Subjects
Astrofísica ,Astronomía ,Física atmosférica - Abstract
We present a comparison of temperature trends using different satellite and radiosonde observations and climate (GCM) and chemistry-climate model (CCM) outputs, focusing on the role of photochemical ozone depletion in the Antarctic lower stratosphere during the second half of the twentieth century. Ozone-induced stratospheric cooling peaks during November at an altitude of approximately 100 hPa in radiosonde observations, with 1969 to 1998 trends in the range of -3.8 to -4.7 K/dec. This stratospheric cooling trend is more than 50% greater than the previously estimated value of -2.4 K/dec, which suggested that the CCMs were overestimating the stratospheric cooling, and that the less complex GCMs forced by prescribed ozone were matching observations better. Corresponding ensemble mean model trends are -3.8K/dec for the CCMs, -3.5K/dec for the CMIP5 GCMs, and -2.7K/dec for the CMIP3 GCMs. Accounting for various sources of uncertainty-including sampling uncertainty, measurement error, model spread, and trend confidence intervals-observations and CCM and GCM ensembles are consistent in this new analysis. This consistency does not apply to each individual that makes up the GCM and CCM ensembles, and some do not show significant ozone-induced cooling. Nonetheless, analysis of the joint ozone and temperature trends in the CCMs suggests that the modeled cooling/ozone-depletion relationship is within the range of observations. Overall, this study emphasizes the need to use a wide range of observations for model validation as well as sufficient accounting of uncertainty in both models and measurements.
- Published
- 2013
5. El Niño, La Niña, and Stratospheric Sudden Warmings: A Reevaluation in Light of the Observational Record
- Author
-
Butler, Amy H. and Polvani, Lorenzo M.
- Subjects
Meteorology ,Atmosphere ,Mathematics - Abstract
Recent studies have suggested that El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) may have a considerable impact on Northern Hemisphere wintertime stratospheric conditions. Notably, during El Niño the stratosphere is warmer than during ENSO-neutral winters, and the polar vortex is weaker. Opposite-signed anomalies have been reported during La Niña, but are considerably smaller in amplitude than during El Niño. This has led to the perception that El Niño is able to substantially affect stratospheric conditions, but La Niña is of secondary importance. Here we revisit this issue, but focus on the extreme events that couple the troposphere to the stratosphere: major, mid-winter stratospheric sudden warmings (SSWs). We examine 53 years of reanalysis data and find, as expected, that SSWs are nearly twice as frequent during ENSO winters as during non-ENSO winters. Surprisingly, however, we also find that SSWs occur with equal probability during El Niño and La Niña winters. These findings corroborate the impact of ENSO on stratospheric variability, and highlight that both phases of ENSO are important in enhancing stratosphere-troposphere dynamical coupling via an increased frequency of SSWs.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. On the Lack of Stratospheric Dynamical Variability in Low-Top Versions of the CMIP5 Models
- Author
-
Charlton-Perez, Andrew J., Baldwin, Mark P., Birner, Thomas, Black, Robert X., Butler, Amy H., Calvo, Natalia, Davis, Nicholas A., Gerber, Edwin P., Gillett, Nathan, Hardiman, Steven, Kim, Junsu, Krüger, Kirstin, Lee, Yun-Young, Manzini, Elisa, McDaniel, Brent A., Polvani, Lorenzo M., Reichler, Thomas, Shaw, Tiffany Ann, Sigmond, Michael, Son, Seok-Woo, Toohey, Matthew, Wilcox, Laura, Yoden, Shigeo, Christiansen, Bo, Lott, François, Shindell, Drew, Yukimoto, Seiji, and Watanabe, Shingo
- Subjects
13. Climate action ,Atmosphere ,Atmosphere, Upper ,Climatic changes - Abstract
We describe the main differences in simulations of stratospheric climate and variability by models within the fifth Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) that have a model top above the stratopause and relatively fine stratospheric vertical resolution (high-top), and those that have a model top below the stratopause (low-top). Although the simulation of mean stratospheric climate by the two model ensembles is similar, the low-top model ensemble has very weak stratospheric variability on daily and interannual time scales. The frequency of major sudden stratospheric warming events is strongly underestimated by the low-top models with less than half the frequency of events observed in the reanalysis data and high-top models. The lack of stratospheric variability in the low-top models affects their stratosphere-troposphere coupling, resulting in short-lived anomalies in the Northern Annular Mode, which do not produce long-lasting tropospheric impacts, as seen in observations. The lack of stratospheric variability, however, does not appear to have any impact on the ability of the low-top models to reproduce past stratospheric temperature trends. We find little improvement in the simulation of decadal variability for the high-top models compared to the low-top, which is likely related to the fact that neither ensemble produces a realistic dynamical response to volcanic eruptions.
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.