Search

The proposed donor heart selection guidelines provide evidence-based and expert-consensus recommendations for the selection of donor hearts following brain death. These recommendations were compiled by an international panel of experts based on an extensive literature review. © 2022 International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation

Donor brain death-induced lung injury may compromise graft function after transplantation. Establishing strategies to attenuate lung damage remains a challenge because the underlying mechanisms remain uncertain. The effects of tacrolimus pretreatment were evaluated in an experimental model of brain death-induced lung injury. Brain death was induced by slow intracranial infusion of blood in anesthetized pigs after randomization to tacrolimus (orally administered at 0.25 mg. kg-1 BID the day before the experiment and intravenously at 0.05 mg. kg-1 one hour before the experiment; n=8) or placebo (n=9) pretreatment. Hemodynamic measurements were performed 1, 3, 5 and 7 hours after brain death. After euthanasia of the animals, lung tissue was sampled for pathobiological and histological analysis, including lung injury scoring (LIS). Tacrolimus pretreatment prevented increases in pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary capillary pressure and decreases in systemic artery pressure and thermodilution cardiac output associated with brain death. After brain death, the ratio of the partial arterial O2 pressure to the inspired O2 fraction (PaO2/FiO2) decreased, which was prevented by tacrolimus. Tacrolimus pretreatment prevented increases in the interleukin (IL)-6-to-IL-10 ratio, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, circulating levels of IL-1β, IL-6-to-IL-10 ratio and glycocalyx-derived molecules. Tacrolimus partially decreased apoptosis [Bax-to-Bcl2 ratio (p=0.07) and the number of apoptotic cells in the lungs (p

An increased number of older recipients underwent liver transplantation in recent years, and consequently needing to obtain more liver grafts. In order to increase this pool, in 2006, we initiated the use of livers from uncontrolled circulatory death (uDCD). We analyzed the use of uDCD livers in sexagenarian recipients and their effect on overall survival.A retrospective and comparative study was performed among 4 groups according to recipient age (less or greater than 60 years) and donor type (donor brain death [DBD] or uDCD): Group A: DBD livers in recipients aged60 years (n = 169); Group B: uDCD livers in recipients aged60 years (n = 36); Group C: DBD livers in recipients aged60 years (n = 96); and Group D: uDCD livers in recipients aged60 years(n = 39).Intraoperative transfusion, biliary complications, primary non-function, acute rejection, chronic renal dysfunction, retransplantation, and mortality during follow-up (cardiovascular diseases in 3 patients, hepatitis C virus recurrence in 4 patients, and de novo malignancies in 3 patients) were significantly higher, and 5-year patient and graft survival was significantly lower in sexagenarian recipients. Bilirubin and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival, whereas hepatocelular carcinoma, creatinine, and packed red blood cells transfusion were risk factors for patient survival. Recipient age (60 years) was confirmed as protective factor for patient and graft survival, whereas the use of uDCD was not a risk factor for patient or graft survival.Use of a uDCD liver did not demonstrate as a risk factor for patient and graft survival, and recipient age (60 years) was a protective factor for patient and graft survival.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Brain death, also known as death by neurologic criteria (DNC), is a well-established concept. In this article, we present a short history of the concept and give an overview of recent changes and a practical update on diagnosis and definitions of brain death/DNC. Unresolved issues will be discussed. RECENT FINDINGS: There is variability in brain death/DNC determination worldwide. In recent years, successful attempts have been made to harmonize these criteria and, consequently, to improve public trust in the process and diagnosis. An international multidisciplinary collaboration has been created and it has published minimum criteria, provided guidance for professionals and encouragement to revise or develop guidelines on brain death/DNC worldwide. SUMMARY: There are two sets of criteria for declaration of death. First, if there is neither cardiac output nor respiratory effort, then cardiopulmonary criteria are used. Second, if both the cerebrum and brainstem have completely and permanently lost all functions, and there is a persistent coma, absent brainstem reflexes and no spontaneous respiratory effort, death can be declared on the basis of brain death/DNC. Although attempts to formulate uniform criteria are ongoing, consensus has been reached on the minimum criteria. Some inconsistencies and questions remain.

Late-phase images on computed tomography angiography (CTA), traditionally used for assessing cerebral circulatory arrest in brain death, suffer from suboptimal diagnostic yield due to stasis filling. Herein, we assessed contrast filling in individual intracranial arteries and veins in the early and late phases of CTA in patients with clinically confirmed brain death.Contrast opacification within 28 arterial/venous segments was evaluated in both phases of CTA in 79 patients. This information was combined with reports in the literature to calculate prevalence of contrast filling in different intracranial vessels. Additionally, diagnostic sensitivity of 4-point, 7-point, and 10-point scores defined for brain death were compared among ratings based on early, late, and both phases (arteries rated on early, veins rated on late phase) of imaging.The median (IQR) number of vessel segments with contrast opacification was 0 (0-2) in early phase and 6 (0-10) in late phase. All segments showed increased prevalence of opacification when evaluated in late phase (p 0.05). The M4 segments of MCA, internal cerebral veins, and vein of Galen had the lowest percentage of opacification in both phases. The sensitivity of 4-, 7-, and 10-point scoring algorithms increased from 59-91% to 94-99% when ratings were performed using early-phase images rather than based solely on late-phase images.The incorporation of early-phase images might be considered as a strategy to improve the sensitivity of CTA as an ancillary test in confirming brain death, especially in patients without missing or questionable elements in clinical examination.

Voluntary contribution has become the only source of donor lungs in China since 2015. To elaborate the outcomes of patients awaiting lung transplantation (LTx) after the implementation of donation after brain death, we performed a retrospective study that encompassed 205 patients with end-stage lung disease who registered for LTx at Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital from January 1, 2015 to January 1, 2021. A total of 180 patients were enrolled in the study. The median waiting time was 1.25 months. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) (103/180, 57.2%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (56/180, 31.1%) were the most common diseases in our study population. The mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) of patients in the died-waiting group was higher than that of the survivors (53.29±21.71 mmHg vs. 42.11±18.58 mmHg, P=0.002). The mortality of patients with ILD (34/103, 33.00%) was nearly twice that of patients with COPD (10/56, 17.86%) while awaiting LTx (P=0.041). In the died-waiting group, patients with ILD had a shorter median waiting time than patients with COPD after being listed (0.865 months vs. 4.720 months, P=0.030). ILD as primary disease and mPAP35 mmHg were two significant independent risk factors for waitlist mortality, with hazard ratios (HR) of 3.483 (95% CI 1.311-9.111; P=0.011) and 3.500 (95% CI 1.435-8.536; P=0.006). Hence, LTx is more urgently needed in patients with ILD and pulmonary hypertension.

Despite the benefits of abdominal normothermic regional perfusion (A-NRP) for abdominal grafts in controlled donation after circulatory death (cDCD), there is limited information on the effect of A-NRP on the quality of the cDCD lungs. We aimed to study the effect of A-NRP in lungs obtained from cDCD and its impact on recipients´ outcomes. This is a study comparing outcomes of lung transplants (LT) from cDCD donors (September 2014 to December 2021) obtained using A-NRP as the abdominal preservation method. As controls, all lung recipients transplanted from donors after brain death (DBD) were considered. The primary outcomes were lung recipient 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year survival. A total of 269 LT were performed (60 cDCD and 209 DBD). There was no difference in survival at 3 months (98.3% cDCD vs. 93.7% DBD), 1 year (90.9% vs. 87.2%), and 5 years (68.7% vs. 69%). LT from the cDCD group had a higher rate of primary graft dysfunction grade 3 at 72 h (10% vs. 3.4%; p .001). This is the largest experience ever reported with the use of A-NRP combined with lung retrieval in cDCD donors. This combined method is safe for lung grafts presenting short-term survival outcomes equivalent to those transplanted through DBD.

The dead donor rule is fundamental to transplant ethics. The rule states that organ procurement must not commence until the donor is both dead and formally pronounced so, and by the same token, that procurement of organs must not cause the death of the donor. In a separate area of medical practice, there has been intense controversy around the participation of physicians in the execution of capital prisoners. These two apparently disparate topics converge in a unique case: the intimate involvement of transplant surgeons in China in the execution of prisoners via the procurement of organs. We use computational text analysis to conduct a forensic review of 2838 papers drawn from a dataset of 124 770 Chinese-language transplant publications. Our algorithm searched for evidence of problematic declarations of brain death during organ procurement. We find evidence in 71 of these reports, spread nationwide, that brain death could not have properly been declared. In these cases, the removal of the heart during organ procurement must have been the proximate cause of the donor's death. Because these organ donors could only have been prisoners, our findings strongly suggest that physicians in the People's Republic of China have participated in executions by organ removal.

The diagnosis of brain death is primarily clinical. Sometimes ancillary tests are needed.This study compared sensitivity and interobserver agreement of the 10-, 7- and 4-point CT angiography scoring systems for the diagnosis of brain death in children.CT angiography examinations of 50 pediatric patients with a clinical diagnosis of brain death were evaluated according to 10-, 7- and 4-point scoring systems. Images were evaluated by two radiologists who considered the vessel opacification first in the arterial phase (AUsing the clinical exam as the reference standard, we found sensitivities for 10-, 7- and 4-point scoring systems to be 70%, 88% and 92% in the AJust as in adult age groups, in children the 4-point scale appears to be more sensitive than the 10- and 7-point scales for CT angiography-based assessment of brain death. Because the scoring systems have similar sensitivities, they could be used as ancillary tests in pediatric cases.

In this article I examine the question of how a liberal state should go about defining death. Plausible standards for a definition of death include a somatic one based on circulatory criteria, death by neurologic criteria (DNC), and higher brain death. I will argue that Rawlsian "burdens of judgment" apply in this process: that is, reasonable disagreement should be expected on important topics, and such disagreement ought not be resolved via the coercive powers of the state. Nevertheless, the state must legislate a definition of death, and in doing so faces a "neutralist dilemma," that is, when there are multiple reasonable ways to move forward, only one can be chosen. I will examine a possible way to exit this neutralist dilemma. Finally, I will argue for DNC as the normatively preferred default definition of death. To do this, I will employ the Rawlsian heuristic of the "original position" and offer public reasons in favor of using DNC as the preferred default definition of death.

The conventional historical account of the concept of brain death credits developments and discoveries of the twentieth century with its inception, emphasizing the role of technological developments and professional conferences, notably the 1968 Ad Hoc Committee of the Harvard Medical School to Examine the Definition of Brain Death. This essay argues that the French physician Eugène Bouchut anticipated the concept of brain death as early as 1846. Correspondence with Bouchut’s understanding of brain death and one important contemporary concept of brain death is established then contrasted with current trends of defining death as the death of the brain. The philosophical factors that influenced Bouchut and the later developments of concepts of brain death are considered, with special reference to mechanistic philosophy and vitalism.

Donor hepatic artery thrombosis (dHAT) identified during liver procurement and backtable is a rare and little-reported event that can make liver transplants unfeasible.This is a retrospective study of dHAT identified during liver grafts procurements or backtable procedures. All grafts were recovered from brain-dead donors. The demographic characteristics of the donors and the incidence of dHAT were analyzed. The data were also compared to a cohort of donors without dHAT.There was a total of 486 donors during the study period. The incidence of dHAT was 1.85% (n = 9). The diagnosis of dHAT was made during procurement in 5 cases (55.5%) and during the backtable in 4 (44.4%). Most donors were female (n = 5), with an average BMI of 28.14 ± 6.9 kg/mThe occurrence of dHAT before liver procurement is a rare event, however it may become a treacherous pitfall if the diagnosis is late. Grafts with anatomic variations recovered from women with brain death due to stroke and with past history of hypertension seem to be at a higher risk of presenting dHAT.

Background: A guideline to determine pediatric brain death was updated in 2011. It is unknown how pediatric intensivists have accepted and adopted the revised guideline into clinical practice. Methods: We surveyed US pediatric critical care attending physicians July 2013 to September 2013 and February 2020 to May 2020. Brain death testing practices and utilization of the 2011 pediatric and neonatal brain death guideline were assessed. Results: The 2020 respondents found that the revised pediatric brain death guideline were useful in clinical practice (93.7% vs 83.3%, P = .0484) and provided more consistency and clarity (73.2% vs 63.1%, P = .0462) when compared to 2013 respondents. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that with defined criteria, survey participants reported increased clarity and consistency. Findings from our study indicate that in clinical practice there is no significant deviation from the minimum requirements to determine brain death in children as outlined in the 2011 guideline.

To detect the cerebral blood vessels and perfusion using neuroimaging modalities including computed tomography angiography (CTA), computed tomography perfusion (CTP), and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in children with brain death (BD).According to the current children's BD criteria, 5 children (3 males, 2 females, mean age of 5.65 years) with BD were enrolled from January 2019 to December 2020. The imaging features of CTA, CTP, and ASL were evaluated to analyze the visualization of important intracranial blood vessels and the states of the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) related to the region of interest (ROI) brain tissue during the two clinical assessments for BD.The "4-point scale" scoring system of CTA was applied to evaluate BD and no negative results were detected. The CTP results of the 5 children suggested the cessation of cerebral circulation with 100% positive results. The ranges of CBF and CBV were 0.00-9.52 ml/100 g/min (mean value 4.95 ± 1.69 ml/100 g/min) and 0.00-1.34 ml/100 g (mean value 0.36 ± 0.20 ml/100 g), respectively. One patient also underwent ASL examination, which demonstrated a significant reduction in whole brain perfusion, indicating the absence of cerebral circulation. The CBF values of the brainstem, basal ganglia, and prefrontal lobe were 11.61 ± 1.49 ml/100 g/min, 7.81 ± 2.42 ml/100 g/min, and 9.94 ± 2.01 ml/100 g/min, respectively.Neuroimaging examinations particularly CTA and CTP reveal well the hemodynamic and cerebral blood vessels changes of BD, which can be used as supplementary supportive evidence for the declaration of brain death in children.

Summary Background Bone allografts are harvested and transplanted under sterile conditions. However, the risk of bacterial contamination of grafts during these processes is a health concern. Bioburden testing and bacterial contamination detection are conducted to ensure allograft sterility. Aim The present study aimed to determine the incidence of bacterial contamination in bone allografts based on different classifications. Methods PROSPERO registration number was received for the study. Systematic searches were conducted in PubMed and EMBASE databases with relevant keywords from January 2000 to March 2021. After choosing related studies according to the PRISMA flow diagram, Stata software was used for data analysis. We considered I 2 ˃ 50% as heterogeneity between studies. Findings The overall incidence of bacterial contamination was 12.6% (95% CI 0.100, 0.152) among 19,805 bone allografts of 17 studies. The bacterial contamination rate among bone allografts was 10.8% before 2010 and 14.7% in 2010-March 2021. The contamination frequency in Asia, Europe, and Australia was 11.5%, 14.3%, and 5.2%, respectively. Bone contamination rates were higher in cadaver donors (19.9%), retrieval time sampling (13.5%), and swab samples (13.2%) compared to those in living donors (7.5%), implantation time sampling (6.9%), and bone fragments cultures (6.3%). Bacterial contamination was recovered 24.4%, 19.7%, 13.2%, and 21% from tibia, fibula, femoral, and other bones, respectively. Staphylococcus spp. was the predominant isolated bacteria from bones (63.2% of all isolated genera), followed by Propionibacterium spp. (10.6%). Conclusion The high contamination of bone allografts is a health concern, indicating the need for more health monitoring and improvement of standards.

One of the important tasks of a modern hospital, in addition to treatment, prevention, and education, is the activity in the field of donating organs from deceased and living donors. In July 2010, the Polish Transplantation Coordination Center Poltransplant (the national transplantation organization and the authority responsible for organ donation and transplantation), thanks to the funds of the Ministry of Health, under the National Program for the Development of Transplant Medicine, initiated the project of building a network of coordinators by employing hospital transplantation coordinators in selected hospitals, where it is possible to identify potential deceased donors, perform the brain death diagnostic procedure, and where the conditions are met and it is possible to collect organs (they have an intensive care unit and operating theater in their structures). In Poland, these conditions are met by 388 hospitals with a donation potential.The aim of the work is to present the functioning of the system of transplant coordinators in Poland.The work presents the system of employment and tasks of transplant coordinators at various levels: hospital coordinators for donating organs from deceased donors, living donation and transplant coordinators, coordinators of hematopoietic cell collection and transplantation, central coordinators of Poltransplant, and organ procurement and transplant coordinators associated with transplant centers.

Static cold preservation remains the cornerstone for storing donor livers following procurement; however, the choice between University of Wisconsin solution (UW) and histidine-tryptophan-ketoglutarate solution (HTK) remains controversial. Recent International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS) guidelines have recommended avoiding HTK for donation after circulatory death (DCD) grafts based on older reports. We studied the latest US adult graft outcomes in three recent eras (2006-2010, 2011-2015, 2016-2020) comparing HTK and UW among 5956 DCD LTs: 3873 (65.0%) used UW and 1944 (32.7%) used HTK. In a total of 82,679 donation after brain death (DBD) liver transplantations (LTs), 63,511 (76.8%) used UW and 15,855 (19.2%) used HTK. The HTK group had higher 1-year and 5-year graft survival rates of 89.7% and 74.3%, respectively, compared with 85.9% and 70.8% in the UW group in the 2016-2020 era (p = 0.005). This difference remained when adjusted for important potential confounders (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval: 0.60, 0.99). There were no differences between groups among DCD LTs in the earlier eras or among DBD LTs in all eras (all p values0.05). The latest US data suggest that HTK is at least noninferior to UW for preserving DCD livers. These data support HTK use in DCD LT and contradict ILTS guidance.

Organ shortage is the main limiting factor for further dissemination of organ transplantation therapies; implementation of brain-death (BD) criteria for organ donation purposes is essential for overcoming this limitation. Investigating and characterizing the effects of this intervention on organ availability and subsequent orthotopic organ transplantation in Asia, the world's most populous continent, should shed light on a global issue. The aim of this study was to describe temporal trends in brain-death donors (BDDs) and deceased-donor transplants (DDTs) in the Asian continent.We used data from the Global Observatory on Donation and Transplantation (GODT), the world's most comprehensive source of data relating to organ donation and transplantation activities. Available data on the number of BDDs and DDTs in 48 Asian countries was collated and analyzed for the years 2000-2019.The number of BDDs in Asia increased progressively, from 25 BBDs in 2000 to 5357 in 2019. The number of DDTs increased concomitantly, albeit with an initial decline between 2004 and 2008, with an exponential increase in the number of kidney and liver transplants, followed by heart and lung transplants. Data from the latest year with complete data (2019) demonstrated 25,557 deceased-donor organs were transplanted, representing a3-fold increase in the number of transplanted organs compared with the nadir in 2008.Although the Asian continent has noticed a rapid increase in BD transplantation activities during the past 2 decades, it is self-evident that further dissemination and adoption of BD donation are fundamental to reducing organ shortage gap.

The increase in the number of patients on the kidney transplant waiting list has led to an attempt to increase the number of potential donors by incorporating candidates that previously would not have been considered optimal, including donors after cardiac death (DCD) and those with "expanded" criteria (ECD). Recipients of controlled DCD (cDCD) grafts suffer more delayed graft function (DGF), but have a long-term evolution comparable to those of brain-dead donors, which has allowed an increase in the number of cDCD transplants in different countries in recent years. In parallel, the use of cDCD with expanded criteria (cDCD/ECD) has increased in recent years in different countries, allowing the waiting list for kidney transplantation to be shortened. The use of these grafts, although associated with a higher frequency of DGF, offers similar or only slightly lower long-term graft survival than those of brain death donors with expanded criteria. Different studies have observed that cDCD/ECD graft recipients have worse kidney function than cDCD/standard and brain death/ECD. Mortality associated with cDCD/ECD graft transplantation mostly relates to the recipient age. Patients who receive a cDCD/≥60 graft have better survival than those who continue on the waiting list, although this fact has not been demonstrated in recipients of cDCD/65 years. The use of this type of organ should be accompanied by the optimization of surgical times and the shortest possible cold ischemia.

Objective: To evaluate the educational impact of a pilot MOOC (Massive Open Online Course), validated by the French College of Urology Teachers (FCUT), on the surgical technique of kidney transplantation.Materials and methods: We developed a MOOC on the surgical technique of kidney transplantation, based on a video of a surgical procedure, performed by an expert surgeon. The MOOC has been validated by the FCUT. We have created 2 student groups: 1) MOOC-pre-QCM group: visualization of the MOOC then answer to the MCQs and satisfaction questions; 2) MOOC-post-QCM group: answer to the MCQs then visualization of the MOOC then answers to the satisfaction questions. In total, 20 MCQs on the kidney transplantation technique were completed by the 2 groups. The answers were anonymous.Results: A total of 142 people answered the MCQs (MOOC-pre-QCM group (n=66) and MOOC-post-QCM group (n=76)). Twenty-nine percent (41/142) of the participants were fellows and 71 % (101/142) were residents. The proportion of fellows and residents was identical between the 2 groups. The rate of correct answers to the 20 MCQs was statistically higher in the MOOC-pre-QCM group, compared to the MOOC-post-QCM group (88.6 % versus 73.3 %, P, ObjectifÉvaluer l’impact pédagogique d’un MOOC (Massive Open Online Course) pilote, validé par le Collège français des enseignants en urologie (CFEU), sur la technique chirurgicale de transplantation rénale.Matériel et méthodesNous avons réalisé un MOOC sur la technique chirurgicale de transplantation rénale, à partir d’une vidéo d’une intervention chirurgicale, réalisée par un chirurgien expert. Le MOOC a été validé par le CFEU. Nous avons créé 2 groupes d’étudiants : 1) groupe MOOC-pré-QCM : visualisation du MOOC, puis réponse aux QCM et aux questions de satisfaction ; 2) groupe MOOC-post-QCM : réponse aux QCM, puis visualisation du MOOC, puis réponse aux questions de satisfaction. Au total, 20 QCM sur la technique transplantation rénale ont été remplis par les 2 groupes. Les réponses étaient anonymes.RésultatsAu total, 142 personnes ont répondu aux QCM (groupe MOOC-pré-QCM (n = 66) et groupe MOOC-post-QCM (n = 76)). 29 % (41/142) des participants étaient des CCA ou assistants et 71 % (101/142) étaient des internes. La proportion de CCA/assistants et d’internes était identique entre les 2 groupes. Le taux de réponses correctes aux 20 QCM était statistiquement supérieur dans le groupe MOOC-pré-QCM, en comparaison au groupe MOOC post-QCM (88,6 % contre 73,3 %, p < 0,0001). Au total, 91 % des étudiants ont trouvé le MOOC « Très Utile » ou « Utile ». La médiane de la note du MOOC, donnée par les étudiants, était de 8/10.ConclusionCette étude a montré un impact positif du MOOC sur les connaissances théoriques de la technique chirurgicale de transplantation rénale. Ce MOOC pourrait servir de projet pilote pour le développement d’autres MOOC sur la chirurgie urologique.Niveau3.

OBJECTIVE: To identify optimal conditions for recovering viable inner ear tissues from deceased organ donors. SETTING: Tertiary recovery hospitals and Donor Network West Organ Recovery Center. INTERVENTIONS: Recovering bilateral inner ear tissues and immunohistological analysis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Immunohistochemical analysis of utricles from human organ donors after brain death (DBD) or donors after cardiac death (DCD). RESULTS: Vestibular tissues from 21 organ donors (39 ears) were recovered. Of these, 18 donors (33 utricles) were examined by immunofluorescence. The sensory epithelium was present in 7 utricles (two from DBD and five from DCD). Relative to DBD utricles, DCD organs more commonly displayed dense populations of hair cells and supporting cells. Relative to DBD, DCD had significantly shorter postmortem interval time to tissue recovery (less than 48 hours). Compared to donors with no sensory epithelium, donors with intact and viable sensory epithelium (both DCD and DBD) had significantly shorter lag time to resuscitation prior to hospital admission (6.4±9.2 versus 35.6±23.7 minutes, respectively) as well as a shorter time between pronouncement of death to organ recovery (22.6±30.4 versus 64.8 ±22.8 hours, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Organ donors are a novel resource for bilateral inner ear organs. Selecting tissue donors within defined parameters can optimize the quality of recovered inner ear tissues, thereby facilitating future research investigating sensory and non-sensory cells.

There are increasing calls to reject the dead-donor rule and permit organ donation euthanasia in organ transplantation. I argue that the fundamental problem with this proposal is that it would bestow more worth on the organs than on the donor who possesses them. What is at stake is the basis of human equality, which, I argue, should be based on an ineliminable dignity that each of us has in virtue of having a rational nature. To allow mortal harvesting would be to make our worth contingent upon variable quality-of-life judgments that can be based only on properties that come in degrees. Thus, rejecting the dead-donor rule comes at the expense of egalitarian principles with respect to the value each individual human life has in relation to the protections against killing.

To identify clinical and radiological factors associated to early evolution to brain death (BD), defined as occurring within the first 24 hours.A retrospective cohort study was made covering the period 2015-2017.An adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU).Epidemiological, clinical and imaging (CT scan) parameters upon admission to the ICU in patients evolving to BD.A total of 166 patients with BD (86 males, mean age 62.7 years) were analyzed. Primary cause: intracerebral hemorrhage 42.8%, subarachnoid hemorrhage 18.7%, traumatic brain injury 17.5%, anoxia 9%, stroke 7.8%, other causes 4.2%. Epidemiological data: arterial hypertension 50%, dyslipidemia 34%, smoking 33%, antiplatelet medication 21%, alcoholism 19%, anticoagulant therapy 15%, diabetes 15%. The Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) upon admission was 3 in 68.8% of the cases in early BD versus in 38.2% of the cases in BD occurring after 24 h (p = 0.0001). Eighty-five patients presented supratentorial hematomas with a volume of 90.9 ml in early BD versus 82.7 ml in BD 24 h (p = 0.54). The mean midline shift was 10.7 mm in early BD versus 7.8 mm in BD 24 h (p = 0.045). Ninety-one patients presented ventriculomegaly and 38 additionally ependymal transudation (p = 0.021). Thirty-six patients with early BD versus 24 with BD 24 h presented complete effacement of basal cisterns (p = 0.005), sulcular effacement (p = 0.013), loss of cortico-subcortical differentiation (p = 0.0001) and effacement of the suprasellar cistern (p = 0.005). The optic nerve sheath measurements showed no significant differences between groups.Early BD (24 h) was associated to GCS 5, midline shift, effacement of the basal cisterns, cerebral sulci and suprasellar cistern, and ependymal transudation.

© 2023 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made., Background and purpose: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis due to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (CVST-VITT) is an adverse drug reaction occurring after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination. CVST-VITT patients often present with large intracerebral haemorrhages and a high proportion undergoes decompressive surgery. Clinical characteristics, therapeutic management and outcomes of CVST-VITT patients who underwent decompressive surgery are described and predictors of in-hospital mortality in these patients are explored. Methods: Data from an ongoing international registry of patients who developed CVST within 28 days of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, reported between 29 March 2021 and 10 May 2022, were used. Definite, probable and possible VITT cases, as defined by Pavord et al. (N Engl J Med 2021; 385: 1680-1689), were included. Results: Decompressive surgery was performed in 34/128 (27%) patients with CVST-VITT. In-hospital mortality was 22/34 (65%) in the surgical and 27/94 (29%) in the non-surgical group (p < 0.001). In all surgical cases, the cause of death was brain herniation. The highest mortality rates were found amongst patients with preoperative coma (17/18, 94% vs. 4/14, 29% in the non-comatose; p < 0.001) and bilaterally absent pupillary reflexes (7/7, 100% vs. 6/9, 67% with unilaterally reactive pupil, and 4/11, 36% with bilaterally reactive pupils; p = 0.023). Postoperative imaging revealed worsening of index haemorrhagic lesion in 19 (70%) patients and new haemorrhagic lesions in 16 (59%) patients. At a median follow-up of 6 months, 8/10 of surgical CVST-VITT who survived admission were functionally independent. Conclusions: Almost two-thirds of surgical CVST-VITT patients died during hospital admission. Preoperative coma and bilateral absence of pupillary responses were associated with higher mortality rates. Survivors often achieved functional independence., This research was funded by the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw, grant number 10430072110005) and the Dr C.J. Vaillant Foundation.

In an attempt to address the organ shortages in heart transplantation, USA centres have begun utilizing donation after cardiac death (DCD) as an alternative to traditional donation after brain death (DBD). As this paradigm continues to expand, there is a need to address the medico-legal and ethical aspects of DCD donation, which is the focus of the current review.Current protocols use criteria established by the Uniform Determination of Death Act (UDDA), which is explicit in defining the irreversibility of circulation and brain function in determining death. By the nature of DCD, the patient may not meet death criteria from a biological systems perspective of irreversibility, and thus, the moral dilemma ensues on whether removing vital organs violates our legal and moral obligations to the patient.In the current article, we review the ethical issues raised with DCD and define DCD protocols and their ability to comply with established regulatory guidelines while respecting the wishes of patients and their surrogates through informed decisions making about organ donation and end-of-life care.

Current risk-adjusted models for donor lung use and lung graft survival do not include donor critical care data. We sought to identify modifiable donor physiologic and mechanical ventilation parameters that predict donor lung use and lung graft survival. This is a prospective observational study of donors after brain death (DBDs) managed by 19 Organ Procurement Organizations from 2016 to 2019. Demographics, mechanical ventilation parameters, and critical care data were recorded at standardized time points during donor management. The lungs were transplanted from 1811 (30%) of 6052 DBDs. Achieving ≥7 critical care endpoints was a positive predictor of donor lung use. After controlling for recipient factors, donor blood pH positively predicted lung graft survival (OR 1.48 per 0.1 unit increase in pH) and the administration of dopamine during donor management negatively predicted lung graft survival (OR 0.19). Tidal volumes ≤8 ml/kg predicted body weight (OR 0.65), and higher positive end-expiratory pressures (OR 0.91 per cm H2 O) predicted decreased donor lung use without affecting lung graft survival. A randomized clinical trial is needed to inform optimal ventilator management strategies in DBDs.

Livers procured via donation after cardiac death have produced good outcomes. Some centers use only aortic perfusion; others add portal perfusion.We report a series of organ procurements in which portal perfusion was performed via cannulation of the splenic vein instead of the inferior mesenteric vein in 4 donors after cardiac death and 2 donors after brain death.After declaration of death, donors were brought to the operating room and prepared and draped. During procurement, first the aorta was cannulated, and then the atrium or inferior vena cava was opened and perfusion was started.The spleen was mobilized, the splenic vein was dissected out and cannulated, and portal perfusion was performed with 2 L of University of Wisconsin solution. Five liver allografts were transplanted: 3 at our center, and 2 at outside centers. One liver from a donor after cardiac death was declined because of a high fat content. All 5 transplanted grafts showed good initial function; there was no sign of primary nonfunction, and no vascular or biliary complications developed.For livers from donors after cardiac death, cannulation of the splenic vein was easier than access via the inferior mesenteric vein. For donors after brain death, we also found this technique was suitable for livers with intra-abdominal adhesions or a small inferior mesenteric vein. Graft outcomes in this series were excellent.

Death by neurologic criteria is a diagnosis that has presented complexities since its inception and pediatric cases are no exception. While rare, families may request accommodation to deviate from the traditionally defined diagnostic pathway based on their beliefs, mistrust of the diagnosis, or other complex reasons. Palliative care consultation offers a unique clinical perspective to complement the work of intensivists to support families through the diagnosis and possible resolution around accommodation requests. With misinformation and high-profile cases widely visible to the public through the media, these requests require a thoughtful and informed clinical approach by all members of the interdisciplinary clinical team. Common themes in many of these cases are trauma, bias and their impact on caregivers. We use a case-based approach to explore these complexities and clinical tools.

BACKGROUND Despite well-defined American Academy of Neurology guidelines for death by whole brain criteria (brain death), there is marked variability in national practice, which some have attributed to lack of formal education. Further, communication with surrogates and families about brain death is integral to brain death declaration. As such, we developed a targeted brain death curriculum combining didactics and simulation-based education to improve examination and subsequent communication skills with families. METHODS Multidisciplinary critical care fellows participated in (1) didactic and case-based curriculum, (2) brain death simulated examination (SimMan3G mannequin), and (3) a standardized family scenario with delivery of a brain death diagnosis to a surrogate "family member". Fellows completed a precurriculum and postcurriculum multiple choice knowledge test and survey (Likert 1 to 10 scale) evaluating measures regarding diagnosis and communication of brain death. t Test and 2-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test were used for statistical analysis (P

The hemodynamic maintenance of brain-dead donors will influence the quality of the organs procured for transplantation, including the intestine. Although norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) are commonly used to sustain mean arterial pressure in humans, there are no standardized protocols for their use during maintenance of brain-dead donors. Our aim was to compare the effects of each drug, in the intestinal graft quality using a rat brain-dead donation model.Wistar rats (N = 17) underwent brain death (BD) for 2 hours with NE (NE group) or with DA (DA group) administration; the control group was mechanically ventilated for 2 hours without BD. Jejunum biopsies were obtained at the end of the maintenance period. Histological damage was evaluated using Park-Chiu scale. Villi/crypt ratio, mucosal thickness, Goblet cell count, and villi density were evaluated using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Barrier damage was assessed by bacterial translocation culture counting on liver samples. The inflammatory status of the intestine was evaluated by CD3+ counting by immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-22, and CXCL10.Norepinephrine-treated donors had higher focal ischemic injury in the intestinal mucosa without a substantial modification of morphometrical parameters compared with DA-treated donors. CD3+ mucosal infiltration was greater in intestines procured from brain-dead donors, being highest in NE (p ˂ 0.001). Local inflammatory mediators were affected in BD: DA and NE groups showed a trend to lower expression of IL-22, whereas CXCL10 expression was higher in NE versus control group. Brain death promoted intestinal bacterial translocation, but the use of NE resulted in the highest bacterial counting in the liver (p ˂ 0.01).Our results favor the use of DA instead of NE as main vasoactive drug to manage BD-associated hemodynamic instability. Dopamine may contribute to improve the quality of the intestinal graft, by better preserving barrier function and lowering immune cell infiltration.The hemodynamic maintenance of brain-dead donors will influence the quality of the organs procured for transplantation, including the intestine. Although norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) are commonly used to sustain mean arterial pressure in humans, there are no standardized protocols for their use during maintenance of brain-dead donors. Our aim was to compare the effects of each drug, in the intestinal graft quality using a rat brain-dead donation model.Wistar rats (N = 17) underwent brain death (BD) for 2 hours with NE (NE group) or with DA (DA group) administration; the control group was mechanically ventilated for 2 hours without BD. Jejunum biopsies were obtained at the end of the maintenance period. Histological damage was evaluated using Park-Chiu scale. Villi/crypt ratio, mucosal thickness, Goblet cell count, and villi density were evaluated using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD). Barrier damage was assessed by bacterial translocation culture counting on liver samples. The inflammatory status of the intestine was evaluated by CD3+ counting by immunohistochemistry and gene expression analysis of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-22, and CXCL10.Norepinephrine-treated donors had higher focal ischemic injury in the intestinal mucosa without a substantial modification of morphometrical parameters compared with DA-treated donors. CD3+ mucosal infiltration was greater in intestines procured from brain-dead donors, being highest in NE (p ˂ 0.001). Local inflammatory mediators were affected in BD: DA and NE groups showed a trend to lower expression of IL-22, whereas CXCL10 expression was higher in NE versus control group. Brain death promoted intestinal bacterial translocation, but the use of NE resulted in the highest bacterial counting in the liver (p ˂ 0.01).Our results favor the use of DA instead of NE as main vasoactive drug to manage BD-associated hemodynamic instability. Dopamine may contribute to improve the quality of the intestinal graft, by better preserving barrier function and lowering immune cell infiltration.

Jahi McMath was diagnosed brain dead on 12/12/2013 in strict accordance with both the pediatric and adult Guidelines, reinforced by 4 isoelectric electroencephalograms and a radionuclide scan showing intracranial circulatory arrest. Her magnetic resonance imaging scan 9 1/2 months later surprisingly showed gross integrity of cortex, basal ganglia, thalamus, and upper brainstem. The greatest damage was in the white matter, which was extensively demyelinated and cystic, and in the lower brainstem, most likely from partial herniation that resolved. The apparent integrity of gray matter and the ascending reticular activating system may have provided a potential structural basis for the reemergence of some limited brain functions, while the white matter and lower brainstem lesions would have caused severe motor disability, brainstem areflexia and apnea. The findings indicate that there could never have been a period of sustained intracranial circulatory arrest. Rather, at the time of brain death diagnosis, low blood flow below the detection threshold of the radionuclide scan was sufficient to maintain widespread neuronal viability, though insufficient to support synaptic function. Her case represents the first indirect confirmation of the reality and clinical relevance of global ischemic penumbra, hypothesized in 1999 as a generally unacknowledged and possibly common brain death mimic.

There are concerns that simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplants from donation after circulatory death (DCD) donors have a higher risk of graft failure than those from donation after brain death (DBD) donors. A UK registry analysis of SPK transplants between 2005 and 2018 was performed. Pancreas survivals of those receiving organs from DCD or DBD donors were compared. Multivariable analyses were used to adjust for baseline differences between the two groups and to identify factors associated with pancreas graft loss. A total of 2228 SPK transplants were implanted; 403 (18.1%) were from DCD donors. DCD donors were generally younger, slimmer, less likely to have stroke as a cause of death, with lower terminal creatinines and shorter pancreas cold ischemic times than DBD donors. Median (IQR) follow-up was 4.2 (1.6-8.1) years. On univariable analysis, there were no statistically significant differences in 5-year death-censored pancreas graft survival between the two donor types (79.5% versus 80.4%; p = .86). Multivariable analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5-year pancreas graft loss between transplants from DCD (n = 343) and DBD (n = 1492) donors (hazard ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.76-1.23; p = .12). The findings from this study support the increased use of SPK transplants from DCD donors.

Objectives To identify the causes, modes, and timing of death in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods This is a retrospective data analysis of patients older than 48 hours and younger than 15 years who died in the PICU over a 5-year period from January 2012 until December 2016 at a tertiary hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Results There were 101 deaths out of 2295 admissions, representing average crude mortality rate of 4.4%. Sepsis was the most common cause of death in 31 patients (30.7%), followed by lower respiratory tract infections in 19 (18.8%), and cardiac diseases in 12 (11.9%). Failed cardiopulmonary resuscitation was the most common mode of death in 51 patients (50.5%), followed by withholding life-sustaining treatment in 43 (42.6%), and brain death in 7 (6.9%). Although more deaths occurred during after hours (n=70; 69.3%), there was no significant correlation between mode of death and working hours vs. after hours (p>0.05). Among the cohort, 63 patients (62.4%) had an infection-attributed mortality, of which 43 (68.3%) were bacterial, 14 (22.2%) were viral, and 10 (15.9%) were fungal. Conclusion Infections remain a significant cause of death in the PICU. Further improvement of prevention programs and early therapy of severe infections could lower pediatric mortality. This report highlights the need for enhancing palliative care programs. The low rate of brain death diagnoses warrants further investigation.

AMAÇ: Organ nakli; fonksiyonunu yitirmiş organın yerine kadavra veya canlı verici (donör)’den fonksiyonel organ nakledilmesine denir. Çalışmamızda Isparta il merkezinde yaşayan halkın organ bağışı konusundaki bilgi ve tutumları araştırılmıştır.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEM: Isparta il merkezinde ikamet eden kişilere Mart 2018 - Temmuz 2018 tarihleri arasında anket uygulayarak gerçekleştirildi. Çalışmaya 18 yaş üstü, fizik ve mental yönden sağlıklı olan kişiler kabul edilmiştir. Literatür bilgileri doğrultusunda hazırlanan, bireysel özellikleri ve organ bağışı ile ilgili 61 soru içeren anket formu yüz yüze görüşme tekniği kullanılarak uygulanmıştır.BULGULAR: Katılımcıların 483’i kadın, 432’si erkek idi. Yaşları 18-35 yaş arasında değişmekte olup ortalaması 37 idi. Katılımcılarımızın % 5,2 (n=47) organ bağışında bulunmuş ve kamu hastanelerine güven (%88,5), özel hastanelere (%43) göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Beyin ölümü gerçekleştikten sonra organların bağışı aşamasında, katılımcılarımızdan, kendi onaylarının yeterli olduğunu düşünenler %87,8 oranında, ailesinin onaylaması gerekli olduğunu düşünenler %87,2 oranında iken, hiçbir onay alınmasına gerek duymayanların oranı ise %7,3 olarak bulunmuştur. İnancına bağlı olarak organlarını bağışlayamayacak olan katılımcı sayısı 146 (% 16) iken vücudunun bir parçasını vererek ölüm-yaşam zincirine müdahalenin yanlış olduğunu düşünenlerin sayısı 91 (%10). Organ bağışını artırmak için “maddi teşvik verilmesi”nin olumlu olacağını düşünenlerin oranı % 44,3 iken olumsuz etki oluşturacağına inananlar %43,8 oranında idi.SONUÇ: Organ bağışının aile içinde konuşulup aile bireylerinin birbirlerinin organ bağışı yapmaya taraf olmasının önceden bilmesinin organ bağış oranının artmasına fayda sağlayacaktır. Organ bağışı konusunda yanlış yapılan haberler toplum hafızasında ciddi bir güvensizlik izi bırakmaktadır. Bu güvensizliğin aşılması için sadece organ bağışının ne olduğunun anlatılması değil aynı zaman da beyin ölümünden organ nakline kadar sürecin nasıl işletildiğinin açık olarak açıklaması gerekmektedir., OBJECTIVE: Organ transplantation is the transplantation of a functional organ from a cadaver or a living donor to replace a non-functional organ. The aim of this study was to investigate the attitudes and behaviours towards organ donation of a population living in the province of Isparta, Turkey.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was applied to residents of the provincial centre of Isparta between March 2018 and July 2018. The study included physically, and mentally healthy individuals aged >18 years. A 61-item questionnaire related to personal characteristics and organ transplantation was prepared according to information in literature and was applied to each subject in a face-to-face interview.RESULTS: The study participants comprised 483 females and 432 males with a mean age of 37 years (range, 18-35 years). Of the total group, 47 (5.2%) had undergone organ donation, and there was greater trust in state hospitals than private hospitals (88.5% vs. 43%). At the stage of organ donation following confirmed brain death, 87.2% of the study subjects thought their own approval was sufficient, 87.2% thought there was a need for confirmation from the family, and 7.3% thought that there was no need for any approval. A total of 146 (16%) respondents reported that they would not donate their organs because of their beliefs and 91 (10%) thought that it was wrong to intervene in the chain of life and death by donating a part of the body. It was thought that offering financial encouragement to increase organ donation would be positive by 44.3% and negative by 43.8%.CONCLUSIONS: Talking about organ donation within the family, and family members knowing each other’s views beforehand would be useful in increasing donation rates. Incorrect news about organ donation has left a serious imprint of mistrust in the collective memory. To be able to overcome this mistrust, it is not enough to simply explain what organ donation is, but there must also be clear explanations of how the process is managed from the time of brain death until organ transplantation.

Approximately 15% of deaths in developed nations are due to sudden cardiac arrest, making it the most common cause of death worldwide. Though high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation has improved overall survival rates, the majority of survivors remain comatose after return of spontaneous circulation secondary to hypoxic ischemic injury. Since the advent of targeted temperature management, neurologic recovery has improved substantially, but the majority of patients are left with neurologic deficits ranging from minor cognitive impairment to persistent coma. Of those who survive cardiac arrest, but die during their hospitalization, some progress to brain death and others die after withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment due to anticipated poor neurologic prognosis. Here, we discuss considerations neurologists must make when asked, “Given their recent cardiac arrest, how much neurologic improvement do we expect for this patient?”

Liver transplant (LT) outcomes using machine perfusion (MP) in donation after brain death (DBD) is promising, but the LT outcomes of MP in donation after cardiac death (DCD) is limited in the US. The aim of this study was to compare LT outcomes of MP between DCD and DBD.We analyzed data from the United Network for Organ Sharing between 2016 and 2021 among adult LT recipients. Propensity score matching was performed to assess the outcomes between DCD and DBD.A total of 380 LTs (295 from DBD and 85 from DCD) were performed using MP. When compared with DBD, DCD group had older median recipient age (61 vs 58 years, p = 0.03), higher prevalence of diabetes (41% vs 28%, p = 0.02), lower model for end-stage liver disease score (17 vs 22, p0.01), longer wait time (276 vs 143 days, p0.01) and younger median donor age (40 vs 51 years, p0.01). The most common primary diagnosis was alcohol-related liver disease, and hepatocellular carcinoma was more common in the DCD group (22% vs 13%). On survival analysis, 1-year overall/graft survivals (DCD 95.4% vs DBD 92.1%, p = 0.54; DCD 91.7% vs DBD 89.8%, p = 0.86) were the same. After propensity score matching, overall/graft survivals were the same. In Cox regression analysis, DCD was not an independent risk factor of mortality (hazard ratio 0.80; 95% CI 0.25 to 2.52; p = 0.70) and graft failure (hazard ratio 0.58; 95% CI 0.17 to 1.97; p = 0.38).In transplant recipients who underwent LT using MP, posttransplant outcomes of overall and graft survival were similar among DCD and DBD cohorts.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is a simple parameter implying the inflammatory status. We aimed to explore the association of brain-dead donor NLR change with delayed graft function (DGF) in kidney transplant recipients.We retrospectively analyzed the data on 102 adult brain-dead donors and their corresponding 199 kidney transplant recipients (2018 - 2021). We calculated ΔNLR by subtracting the NLR before evaluating brain death from the preoperative NLR. Increasing donor NLR was defined as ΔNLR0.Forty-four (22%) recipients developed DGF after transplantation. Increasing donor NLR was significantly associated with the development of DGF in recipients (OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2 - 6.6;Dynamic changes of donor NLR are promising in predicting post-transplant DGF. It will assist clinicians in the early recognition and management of renal graft dysfunction. Validation of this new biomarker in a large study is needed.

This article reviews the criteria for determination of brain death, discusses the importance of protocol development, and reviews the international efforts to standardize clinical testing.

BACKGROUND Despite significant improvements in Romania's transplantation system, actual donor numbers have paradoxically fallen, contrary to the European trend. With a donation rate of 3.44 donors per million inhabitants, Romania ranks near the bottom of European countries. This study aimed to identify several predictors of a positive attitude toward organ donation in the Romanian population that could aid in reshaping public policies to improve donation and transplantation rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included a representative Iasi population. Data were collected by means of a questionnaire focused on revealing attitudes toward organ donation, importance of consent, willingness to donate a family member's organs, and role of medical staff in the donation decision. A perception score was calculated as a methodological approach to validate attitudes toward organ donation. RESULTS Of all respondents, 55% agreed to donate their organs if declared brain-dead, while 20% opposed this idea; 72.7% considered consent necessary; 70% believed that consent must belong to the family when it comes to brain-dead organ donors; and 44.5% supported the idea of financial compensation. Higher monthly income was correlated with a positive attitude toward organ donation. CONCLUSIONS Even though the study population had a positive attitude toward organ donation, the willingness to donate was lower than in other European countries and did not translate into actual donations. The necessity of informed consent, lack of knowledge on the topic, bureaucratic aspects, and openness to financial compensation could explain the current situation of the Romanian transplantation system.

The United States’ swine industry is under constant threat of foreign animal diseases, which may emerge without warning due to the globalized transportation networks moving people, animals, and products. Therefore, having disease control and elimination protocols in place prior to pathogen introduction is paramount for business continuity and economic recovery. During extraordinary circumstances, it may become necessary to depopulate large populations of animals, including swine, as a disease containment measure. Currently approved depopulation methods for swine present significant logistical challenges when scaled to large populations or performed in field conditions. In the United States, water-based foam is currently approved for poultry depopulation, and recent field studies demonstrate water-based foam is an effective depopulation alternative for swine. While effective, the speed at which water-based foam induces loss of consciousness prior to death, a major welfare consideration, has not been adequately investigated. In this study, 12 nursery pigs were terminated using water-based medium-expansion foam to quantify the time to induce loss of consciousness and ultimately brain death. Each pig was implanted with subdermal electrodes to capture electroencephalographic data, placed in a body sling, and suspended in a plastic bulk container that was subsequently filled with water-based foam. Electroencephalographic data was recorded for 15 min, during which the pigs remained immersed in the water-based foam. Conservatively, average (± SD) time to unconsciousness and brain death was 1 min, 53 s ± 36 s and 3 min, 3 s ± 56 s, respectively. The relatively rapid loss of consciousness compared to other methods limits the amount of distress and is overall a positive finding for the welfare of the pigs that might be depopulated with water-based foam. The findings of this study add additional evidence supporting the use of water-based medium-expansion foam for an emergency depopulation of swine.

Precocity and assertiveness when diagnosing brain death are essential for identifying potential donors. To assess the knowledge of physicians about brain death and organ donation, cross-sectional web-based survey was carried out with physicians from different specialties. The knowledge about brain death and organ donation was assessed by a questionnaire with 12 multiple-choice or multiple-answer questions (possible range from 0 to 12). The nonparametric Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to verify the association between the physicians' knowledge and others variables. The project was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital das Clínicas, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, under number 4.022.657, and all patients agreed to participate and provided free prior-informed consent. Three hundred sixty physicians were included in this study, most of them have postgraduate (55%) and 59.2% were intensive care physicians. The median of responses was 5 (obtained range from 0 to 10). The participants were classified in 2 groups: with satisfactory knowledge (scores above 5) or without satisfactory knowledge (scores equal/below 5). There was better performance among participants who: completed graduation between 6 and 10 years (P .012); were intensive care physicians (P .002); had participated in training courses (P .001); and those who had worked in intensive care unit (ICU) from 6 to 10 years (P .023); had performed over 10 brain death protocols (P .001), and felt safe to talk to family members about brain death (P .001). The results showed that the participants had low knowledge about diagnosis of brain death and organ donation protocols despite the majority working in ICUs. Be an intensive care physician, had large time experience in ICU, and had performed brain death protocols were associated with unsatisfactory knowledge concerning the subject.

To expand the available donor pool, many organ procurement organizations and transplant programs have begun to consider severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus(SARS-CoV-2) nucleic acid test positive candidates(1). It is becoming increasingly clear that not all donors with a positive nucleic acid amplification test for SARS-CoV-2 are contagious, and some of these organs can be transplanted with careful selection(2, 3). Data from 31 kidney transplants from living donors with resolved COVID-19 in India showed the safety of this approach(4). However, it is unknown whether kidneys from donors with active COVID-19 can also be safely transplanted(3, 5). Beyond the "active" infection designation, it is clinically possible to risk stratify donors with COVID-19 based on additional parameters such as clinical history and radiologic or laboratory findings. Here we present a case and 210-day outcome of a successful kidney transplantation from otherwise medically suitable SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive deceased donors.

Introduction Intraoperative bleeding during liver transplantation has been correlated with a higher risk of morbidity and mortality and decrease in patient and graft survival. Materials and Methods Between January 2006 and December 2016 we performed 783 orthotopic liver transplants. After applying exclusion criteria, we found liver grafts from donors after circulatory death (DCD, group A) were used in 69 patients and liver grafts from donors after brain death (group B) were used in 265 patients. Results No difference was found in terms of sex, body mass index, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, indication for transplantation, intensive care unit stay, and Child-Pugh score. The mean transfusion of hemoderivates was as follows: red blood cell 9 (0-28) units in group A vs 6 (0-20) units in group B (P = .004) and fresh frozen plasma 10 (0-29) units in group A vs 9.5 (0-23) in group B (P = .000). The only 2 factors related to massive blood transfusion (>6 units of red blood cell) were uncontrolled DCD condition (odds ratio = 2.38; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-4.31; P = .004), and higher Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score (odds ratio = 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.53-4.55; P = .001). Survival at 1, 3, and 5 years was 81.3%, 70.2%, and 68.9% in group A vs 89%, 83.7%, and 78% in group B (P = .070). Conclusion The use of liver grafts from DCDs is associated with increased necessity of transfusion of hemoderivates in comparison with the use of liver grafts from donors after brain death.

Organ transplantation is a life-saving intervention for patients suffering from end-stage organ failure, but it relies on the availability of donor organs. However, even when donors are available, the brain-dead organ donor is a clinically complex patient who presents many management challenges. Donor management with a goal of optimization of organ function is essential to maximizing the number of patients who can be helped by each individual donor. Thoughtful critical care management of the potential organ donor, with a focus on meeting donor management goals, can lead to improved donation outcomes.

Controversies surrounding the determination of death by neurologic criteria (DNC), also known as brain death, have become increasingly common over the last decade, occasionally leading to parental refusal of all or part of a brain death evaluation or declaration. We performed a prospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric neurologists and intensivists who participate in professional listservs to ascertain perspectives and practices concerning the evaluation of DNC, specifically on obtaining permission for evaluations and managing refusals. Of the 334 respondents who had performed an evaluation for DNC, 35 percent reported they had experienced at least one parental refusal, and 64.4 percent reported that they did not seek permission to perform an evaluation. Pediatric neurologists, careproviders who had less experience doing evaluations, and careproviders who had experienced parental refusal of an evaluation were more likely to obtain permission from parents. Most (80.8 percent) of respondents reported that their institution had a DNC policy. We found variability in many aspects of DNC evaluations and declarations, as well as the handling of refusals. Lack of consistency may make it more difficult for careproviders and families. Greater understanding of parental refusal of DNC evaluation is essential to inform efforts to increase consistency.