Search

Your search keyword '"Boeyden, V"' showing total 3 results
Start Over Author "Boeyden, V" Language undetermined
3 results on '"Boeyden, V"'

1. Strategy for the management of complex retinal detachments: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report 2

Author

BENMERZOUGA N, METTI F, RAZZARI A, MIESBAUER P, SCHÖNHERR U, ZEYNALOVA Z, BASHIR SJ, JACOB J, KOCH P, LADHA R, SMETS E, STALMANS P, DARE A, DEVENYI R, LAM WC, SHAHEEDA M, POTAMITIS T, CHRISTENSEN SR, RAYES E, MORTADA H, SHOUMAN A, HOLM M, ALBINET P, AMAR JP, BECQUET F, BERROD JP, BOULZE M, BOSCHER C, COURJARET JC, DENION E, FOURMAUX, E, GUIGOU S, HAMON F, LAFONTAINE PO, LE ROUIC JF, LEYNAUD JL, NOCHEZ Y, PERONE JM, RYSANEK B, SOYEUR R, BOPP S, BRIX A, HÖHN F, KUSSEROW C, LUCKE K, MOHR A, SCHÜLER A, WEINBERGER A, GOTZARIDIS S, KARATZENIS D, STEFANIOTOU M, K. TSILIMBARIS MK, TSOURIS D, TSANG CW, GABOR R, SZIJARTO Z, BABU N, BANKER AS, BAPAYE M, KELKAR A, ENTEZARI, M, FATEH MOGHADAM HF, RAMEZANI A, SAFARPOUR LIMA B, OMER K, BOSCIA F, CHIARA FRENO M, CIAN R, DONVITO G, FACINO M, LESNONI G, LIUZZI, F, METE M, MININNI F, MOCHI B, PRIMAVERA V, PERTILE G, TURCO I, VASTARELLA P, FONG K, LEE M, VP LOO A, ARAGON HARRISON O, FLORES AGUILAR M, LOPEZ MONTERO LM, LOPEZCARASA HERNANDEZ G, VELASCO I, BOEYDEN V, BOSSCHA M, DE VRIES KNOPPERT W, LINDSTEDT, E. RENARDEL DE LAVALETTE VW, VAN DEN BIESEN PR, ALHASSAN M, BAERLAND TP, BOBER AM, FORSAA V, FOSSEN K, VARHAUG P, ATIENZA J.r. NF, CISIECKI S, FRYCZKOWSKI P, KOWAL LANGE A, MICHALEWSKA Z, MICHALEWSKI J, NAWROCKI J, NOWOSIELSKA A, ODROBINA D, PIETRAS TRZPIEL M, ZAKRZEWSKA A, MEIRELES A, TEIXEIRA S, ELSHAFEI M, DANIELESCU C, TALU S, ALTYNBAEV U, GORIN A, SEREJINE I, EL DEEB M, DAVIDOVIC S, IGNJATOVIC Z, STEFANICKOVA J, VENTER L, CHANG W, JO YL, KIM JY, LEE J, LIM ST, SAGONG M, ASCASO FJ, CASTRO J, CORDOVES L. DESCO ESTEBAN C, MORENO MANRESA J, VILAPLANA D, JANIEC S, TOMIC Z, BEN YAHIA S, ACAR N, GÜNGEL H, KAPRAN Z, OSMANBASOGLU O, OZDEK S, TOPBAS S, TOTAN Y, ÜNVER YB, CHICHUR D, DOBROVOLSKEY O, KOZLOVSKA I, LYTVYNCHUK L, PHYLYPCHUK O, POSTOLOVSKA A, SERGIIENKO A, SHEVCHYK V, WINDER S, CULOTTA J, KIM S, KING J, KURUP SK, LIN SJ, PACURARIU R, ROTH D, SINCLAIR S, WEBER P, DOAN H, TUNG T., ROMANO, MARIO, Benmerzouga, N, Metti, F, Razzari, A, Miesbauer, P, Schönherr, U, Zeynalova, Z, Bashir, Sj, Jacob, J, Koch, P, Ladha, R, Smets, E, Stalmans, P, Dare, A, Devenyi, R, Lam, Wc, Shaheeda, M, Potamitis, T, Christensen, Sr, Rayes, E, Mortada, H, Shouman, A, Holm, M, Albinet, P, Amar, Jp, Becquet, F, Berrod, Jp, Boulze, M, Boscher, C, Courjaret, Jc, Denion, E, Fourmaux, E, Guigou, S, Hamon, F, Lafontaine, Po, LE ROUIC, Jf, Leynaud, Jl, Nochez, Y, Perone, Jm, Rysanek, B, Soyeur, R, Bopp, S, Brix, A, Höhn, F, Kusserow, C, Lucke, K, Mohr, A, Schüler, A, Weinberger, A, Gotzaridis, S, Karatzenis, D, Stefaniotou, M, K., TSILIMBARIS MK, Tsouris, D, Tsang, Cw, Gabor, R, Szijarto, Z, Babu, N, Banker, A, Bapaye, M, Kelkar, A, Entezari, M, FATEH MOGHADAM, Hf, Ramezani, A, SAFARPOUR LIMA, B, Omer, K, Boscia, F, CHIARA FRENO, M, Cian, R, Donvito, G, Facino, M, Lesnoni, G, Liuzzi, F, Mete, M, Mininni, F, Mochi, B, Primavera, V, Romano, Mario, Pertile, G, Turco, I, Vastarella, P, Fong, K, Lee, M, VP LOO, A, ARAGON HARRISON, O, FLORES AGUILAR, M, LOPEZ MONTERO, Lm, LOPEZCARASA HERNANDEZ, G, Velasco, I, Boeyden, V, Bosscha, M, DE VRIES KNOPPERT, W, Lindstedt, E., RENARDEL DE LAVALETTE VW, VAN DEN BIESEN, Pr, Alhassan, M, Baerland, Tp, Bober, Am, Forsaa, V, Fossen, K, Varhaug, P, ATIENZA J. r., Nf, Cisiecki, S, Fryczkowski, P, KOWAL LANGE, A, Michalewska, Z, Michalewski, J, Nawrocki, J, Nowosielska, A, Odrobina, D, PIETRAS TRZPIEL, M, Zakrzewska, A, Meireles, A, Teixeira, S, Elshafei, M, Danielescu, C, Talu, S, Altynbaev, U, Gorin, A, Serejine, I, EL DEEB, M, Davidovic, S, Ignjatovic, Z, Stefanickova, J, Venter, L, Chang, W, Jo, Yl, Kim, Jy, Lee, J, Lim, St, Sagong, M, Ascaso, Fj, Castro, J, CORDOVES L., DESCO ESTEBAN C, MORENO MANRESA, J, Vilaplana, D, Janiec, S, Tomic, Z, BEN YAHIA, S, Acar, N, Güngel, H, Kapran, Z, Osmanbasoglu, O, Ozdek, S, Topbas, S, Totan, Y, Ünver, Yb, Chichur, D, Dobrovolskey, O, Kozlovska, I, Lytvynchuk, L, Phylypchuk, O, Postolovska, A, Sergiienko, A, Shevchyk, V, Winder, S, Culotta, J, Kim, S, King, J, Kurup, Sk, Lin, Sj, Pacurariu, R, Roth, D, Sinclair, S, Weber, P, Doan, H, and Tung, T.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the outcome of the treatment of complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs). DESIGN: Nonrandomized, multicenter, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred seventy-six surgeons from 48 countries spanning 5 continents reported primary procedures for 7678 RRDs. METHODS: Reported data included clinical manifestations, the method of repair, and the outcome. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Failure of retinal detachment repair (level 1 failure rate), remaining silicone oil at the study's conclusion (level 2 failure rate), and need for additional procedures to repair the detachments (level 3 failure rate). RESULTS: The main categories of complex retinal detachments evaluated in this investigation were: (1) grade B proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR; n = 917), (2) grade C-1 PVR (n = 637), (3) choroidal detachment or significant hypotony (n = 578), (4) large or giant retinal tears (n = 1167), and (5) macular holes (n = 153). In grade B PVR, the level 1 failure rate was higher when treated with a scleral buckle alone versus vitrectomy (P = 0.0017). In grade C-1 PVR, there was no statistically significant difference in the level 1 failure rate between those treated with vitrectomy, with or without scleral buckle, and those treated with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.7). Vitrectomy with a supplemental buckle had an increased failure rate compared with those who did not receive a buckle (P = 0.007). There was no statistically significant difference in level 1 failure rate between tamponade with gas versus silicone oil in patients with grade B or C-1 PVR. Cases with choroidal detachment or hypotony treated with vitrectomy had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle alone (P = 0.0015). Large or giant retinal tears treated with vitrectomy also had a significantly lower failure rate versus treatment with scleral buckle (P = 7×10(-8)). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with retinal detachment, when choroidal detachment, hypotony, a large tear, or a giant tear is present, vitrectomy is the procedure of choice. In retinal detachments with PVR, tamponade with either gas or silicone oil can be considered. If a vitrectomy is to be performed, these data suggest that a supplemental buckle may not be helpful. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.

Published
2013

2. Reproducibility of evaluation of optic disc change for glaucoma with stereo optic disc photographs

Author

Miglior, S, Zeyen, T, Pfeiffer, N, Cunha-Vaz, J, Linsen, Mc, Pellicci, L, Janssens, A, van der Veken, A, Nerinckx, F, Boeyden, V, Czupper, M, Wendrix, G, Detry-Morel, M, Kestelyn, P, Van den Abeele, K, Jacobs, K, Decock, C, Goethals, M, Pourjavan, S, Maris, K, Deghislage, C, Kersten, I, Vogel, A, Herkel, U, Schwenn, O, Maser-Wahle, M, Funk, J, Schmidt, B, Akbariyeh, N, Burk, R, Thomsen, A, Grehn, F, Marquardt, D, Orzalesi, N, Rossetti, L, Ferrante, M, Mandelli, L, Marini, S, Bertoni, G, Blini, M, De Molfetta, M, Bonomi, L, Morbio, R, Marraffa, M, Maraini, G, Gandolfi, S, Williams, S, Cimino, L, Dondi, P, Lumbroso, B, Manni, G, Cocco, F, Glorialanza, G, Villani, Cm, Pocobelli, A, Cesareo, M, Cupo, G, Neuschuler, R, Pernini, C, Catalani, R, Ribeiro, L, Faria, I, Pereira, Jm, Chingui, S, Duarte, L, Carvalheira, F, Baltar, A, Simao, A, Arede, J, Magalhaes, A, Abrantes, P, Reina, M, Silva, Jp, Romano, G, Silva, S, Torri, V, Poli, D, Nerviani, C, Tinazzi, A, Floriani, I, Adamsons, I, Caprioli, J, Wormald, R, Heijl, A, Airaksinen, J, Michaelis, J, Shedden, A, Gottfried, E, Hutzelmann, J, Rusk, C, Reines, S, Spector, R, Hombrey, J, Snyder, H, Gacos, J, Snapinn, S, Getson, A, Amos, J, Serruys, K, Malbecq, W, John, E, Chapman, J, Beck, J, Tessi, C, Rao, N, Bottari, Fp, D'Achille, R, Wilkins, A, Bauer, C, Derouwaux, C, Van der Straeten, A, Cunha, M, Santana, R, Andrade, Lg, Bule, S, Melo, R, Baumont, H, and Bonaventura, I

Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty, genetic structures, Optic Disk, Optic disk, Glaucoma, Interobserver reproducibility, Cohen's kappa, Double-Blind Method, Ophthalmology, Optic Nerve Diseases, medicine, Photography, Humans, Observer Variation, Reproducibility, business.industry, Outcome measures, Reproducibility of Results, medicine.disease, eye diseases, Confidence interval, medicine.anatomical_structure, sense organs, business, Optic disc
Abstract

PURPOSE To determine the reproducibility of the assessment for glaucomatous change in serial optic disc stereo-slides. DESIGN Masked interobserver variability study. PARTICIPANTS Serial optic disc stereo-slides from 40 patients. METHODS Three independent ophthalmologists evaluated for change a set of two serial 20 degrees optic disc color stereo-slides of 40 patients. This test set was not from European Glaucoma Prevention Study (EGPS) patients. Each observer performed two evaluations at least 30 days apart and was masked from the temporal sequence of the slides and his or her previous evaluation. Each patient was graded as changed or stable by two-out-of-three agreement. A kappa statistic was used to calculate the intra- and interobserver reproducibility as well as the assignment reproducibility (first consensus versus second consensus). The same procedure was followed to test the reproducibility when another experienced ophthalmologist was added to one of the three reading centers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Reproducibility in evaluating glaucomatous optic disc change. RESULTS The intraobserver reproducibility (95% confidence interval [CI]) in the evaluation of change ranged between 0.79 (0.45-1.14) and 1.00 (0.69-1.31). The interobserver reproducibility (95% CI) in the evaluation of change ranged between 0.45 (0.15-0.75) and 0.75 (0.44-1.06). The assignment reproducibility (first consensus versus second consensus in the evaluation of change) between the senior EGPS readers was 0.94 (0.63-1.25). The assignment reproducibility when another experienced ophthalmologist replaced one of the readers was 0.94 (0.63-1.25). CONCLUSIONS The assignment reproducibility of three expert readers looking for glaucomatous change in serial optic disc stereo-slides was excellent. It remained so when one of the three experts was replaced by another experienced reader.

Published
2003

3. The European glaucoma prevention study design and baseline description of the participants

Author

Miglior, S, Zeyen, T, Pfeiffer, N, Cunha-Vaz, J, Linsen, Mc, Pellicci, L, Janssens, A, van der Veken, A, Nerinckx, F, Boeyden, V, Detry-Morel, M, Kestelijn, P, Van den Abeele, K, Jacobs, K, Decock, C, Goethals, M, Pourjavan, S, Maris, K, Kersten, I, Vogel, A, Herkel, U, Schwenn, O, Maser-Wahle, M, Funk, J, Schmidt, B, Akbariyeh, N, Burk, R, Thomsen, A, Grehn, F, Marquardt, D, Orzalesi, N, Rossetti, L, Ferrante, M, Mandelli, L, Marini, S, Bagno, S, Bertoni, G, Blini, M, De Molfetta, M, Bonomi, L, Morbio, R, Marraffa, M, Maraini, G, Gandolfi, S, Williams, S, Cimino, L, Dondi, P, Lumbroso, B, Manni, G, Cocco, F, Glorialanza, G, Villani, Cm, Pocobelli, A, Cesareo, M, Cupo, G, Neuschuler, R, Pernini, C, Catalani, R, Ribeiro, L, Faria, I, Pereira, Jm, Chingui, S, Duarte, L, Carvalheira, F, Baltar, A, Simao, A, Arede, J, Magalhaes, A, Abrantes, P, Reina, M, Silva, Jp, Romano, G, Silva, S, Torri, V, Poli, D, Nerviani, C, Tinazzi, A, Adamsons, I, Caprioli, J, Wormald, R, Hejil, A, Airaksinen, J, Michaelis, J, Floriani, I, Shedden, A, Gottfried, E, Hutzelmann, J, Rusk, C, Reines, S, Spector, R, Hombrey, J, Snyder, H, Gacos, J, Snapinn, S, Getson, A, Amos, J, Serruys, K, Malbecq, W, John, E, Chapman, J, Beck, J, Tessi, C, Rao, N, Bottari, Fp, D'Achille, R, Wilkins, A, Magerl, K, Bauer, C, Derouwaux, C, Cunha, M, Santana, R, Andrade, Lg, Bule, S, Melo, R, Baumont, H, Bonaventura, I, Miglior, S, Zeyen, T, Pfeiffer, N, Cunha Vaz, J, Torri, V, and Adamsons, I

Subjects
Adult, Male, medicine.medical_specialty, Intraocular pressure, Visual acuity, genetic structures, Visual Acuity, Glaucoma, Ocular hypertension, Thiophenes, Sulfonamide, law.invention, Visual Field Test, Randomized controlled trial, Dorzolamide, Double-Blind Method, Thiophene, law, Ophthalmology, medicine, Humans, Dioptre, Antihypertensive Agents, Intraocular Pressure, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Sulfonamides, business.industry, Middle Aged, medicine.disease, eye diseases, Europe, Antihypertensive Agent, medicine.anatomical_structure, Research Design, Visual Field Tests, Female, Ocular Hypertension, sense organs, medicine.symptom, Safety, Visual Fields, business, Glaucoma, Open-Angle, Human, Optic disc, medicine.drug
Abstract

Objectives The European Glaucoma Prevention Study seeks to evaluate the efficacy of reducing intraocular pressure (IOP), with dorzolamide to prevent or delay patients affected by ocular hypertension from developing primary open-angle glaucoma. Design Randomized, double-blinded, controlled clinical trial. Participants Patients (age > or =30 years) were enrolled from 18 European centers. The patients fulfilled a series of inclusion criteria including the measurements of IOP (22-29 mmHg), two normal and reliable visual fields (VFs) (on the basis of mean defect and corrected pattern standard deviation/corrected loss of variance of standard 30/II Humphrey or Octopus perimetry), and normal optic disc as determined by the Optic Disc Reading Center (vertical and horizontal cup-to-disc ratios; asymmetry between the two eyes Intervention Patients were randomized to the treatment with dorzolamide or a placebo. Main outcome measures End points are VF and/or optic disc changes. A VF change during the follow-up must be confirmed by two further positive tests. Optic disc change is defined by the agreement of two out of three independent observers evaluating optic disc stereo-slides. Results One thousand seventy-seven subjects were randomized between January 1, 1997 and May 31, 1999. The mean age was 57.03 +/- 10.3 years; 54.41% were women and 99.9% were Caucasian. Mean IOP was 23.6 +/- 1.6 mmHg in both eyes. Mean visual acuity was 0.97 +/- 0.11 in both eyes; mean refraction was 0.23 +/- 1.76 diopters in the right eye and 0.18 +/- 1.79 diopters in the left eye. Previous use of medication for ocular hypertension was reported by 38.4% of the patients, systemic hypertension by 28.1%, cardiovascular diseases by 12.9%, and diabetes mellitus by 4.7%. The qualifying VFs were normal and reliable according to protocol criteria. Conclusions The mean IOP of the patients enrolled in the European Glaucoma Prevention Study is consistent with the estimated mean IOP (within the range of 22-29 mmHg) found in a large sample of the European population. The European Glaucoma Prevention Study should be able to better address the clinical question of whether pharmacological reduction of IOP (by means of dorzolamide) in ocular hypertension patients at moderate risk for developing primary open-angle glaucoma effectively lowers the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma.

Published
2002

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results