Search

BACKGROUND: In the BROCADE3 trial, addition of the poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, veliparib, to carboplatin/paclitaxel improved progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio 0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.57-0.88; P = 0.002) in patients with advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative, germline BRCA1/2-mutated breast cancer. A subset of patients discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on veliparib/placebo maintenance monotherapy until progression. Analyses in this patient subgroup are reported. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. Veliparib (120 mg twice daily) or placebo was given on days -2 to 5, carboplatin (area under the curve 6 mg/ml) on day 1, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of 21-day cycles. Patients who discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression received blinded study drug monotherapy at an increased dose of 300-400 mg twice daily continuously. PFS was the primary endpoint. Exploratory analyses were carried out in the subgroup of patients who received blinded study drug as monotherapy. A time-varying Cox model including data from all patients was also used to evaluate treatment effect in the combination and monotherapy phases. RESULTS: A total of 136 of 337 patients randomized to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel and 58/172 patients randomized to placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel discontinued both carboplatin and paclitaxel before progression and continued on blinded veliparib or placebo monotherapy. In this blinded monotherapy subgroup, investigator-assessed median PFS from randomization was 25.7 months with veliparib versus 14.6 months with placebo. Hazard ratios from a time-varying Cox model favored veliparib during both combination therapy and monotherapy. Any-grade adverse events occurring in the monotherapy phase were primarily gastrointestinal. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia and anemia (4% each with veliparib; 5% and 2%, respectively, with placebo). CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib maintenance monotherapy had a tolerable safety profile and may extend PFS following combination chemotherapy. ispartof: ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY vol:33 issue:3 pages:299-309 ispartof: location:England status: published

Supplementary Figures S1-S2; Supplementary Tables S1-S2.

Supplementary Table 1 - PDF file 57K, Supplementary Table 1. Details of platinum sensitivity and best response to olaparib and post-PARPi chemotherapy of the six patients whose tumor samples were analyzed by massively parallel sequencing. (NE: not evaluable)

Purpose: Klotho is a transmembrane protein which can be shed, act as a circulating hormone and modulate the insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and the fibroblast growth factor (FGF) pathways. We have recently identified klotho as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer. Klotho is expressed in the normal pancreas and both the IGF-I and FGF pathways are involved in pancreatic cancer development. We, therefore, undertook to study the expression and activity of klotho in pancreatic cancer.Experimental Design: Klotho expression was studied using immunohistochemistry and quantitative RT-PCR. Effects of klotho on cell growth were assessed in the pancreatic cancer cells Panc1, MiaPaCa2, and Colo357, using colony and MTT assays and xenograft models. Signaling pathway activity was measured by Western blotting.Results: Klotho expression is downregulated in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Overexpression of klotho, or treatment with soluble klotho, reduced growth of pancreatic cancer cells in vitro and in vivo, and inhibited activation of the IGF-I and the bFGF pathways. KL1 is a klotho subdomain formed by cleavage or alternative splicing. Compared with the full-length protein, KL1 showed similar growth inhibitory activity but did not promote FGF23 signaling. Thus, its administration to mice showed favorable safety profile.Conclusions: These studies indicate klotho as a potential tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer, and suggest, for the first time, that klotho tumor suppressive activities are mediated through its KL1 domain. These results suggest the use of klotho or KL1 as potential strategy for the development of novel therapeutic interventions for pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 17(13); 4254–66. ©2011 AACR.

Supplementary methods Figure S1: The types of samples that were collected for each patient from cohort 2 (recurrence-freee patients). Figure S2: qPCR validations for Nanostring expression measurements. Figure S3: P1 miRNAs expression levels pre- and post-treatment versus normal breast tissue. Figure S4: miR-10b* expression levels. Figure S5: P1 miRNAs and their cell cycle predicted targets BUB1B and CDC25A. Figure S6: P1 scores and Ki67 levels by immunostaining. Figure S7: P1 scores in the METABRIC dataset. Figure S8: P2 miRNAs differentiate between recurrence and recurrence-free patients. Figure S9: P1 and P2 expression levels in ER-positive patients alone. Figure S10: Enrichment of EMT-induced genes in the correlated genes to P5 miRNAs. Figure S11: P5 and P6 miRNAs expression levels at post-treatment lymph nodes approach the levels at recurrence. Figure S12: Effects of the thresholds on the number of miRNAs that were classified to a pattern. Table S1: Miller and Payne grades and RCB classes Table S2: miRNAs' potential role in breast cancer from the literature Table S3: Pathway analysis; shared correlatred pathways across each pattern Table S4: Target genes for P1 miRNAs

Purpose: Molecular evolution of tumors during progression, therapy, and metastasis is a major clinical challenge and the main reason for resistance to therapy. We hypothesized that microRNAs (miRNAs) that exhibit similar variation of expression through the course of disease in several patients have a significant function in the tumorigenic process.Experimental design: Exploration of evolving disease by profiling 800 miRNA expression from serial samples of individual breast cancer patients at several time points: pretreatment, posttreatment, lymph nodes, and recurrence sites when available (58 unique samples from 19 patients). Using a dynamic approach for analysis, we identified expression modulation patterns and classified varying miRNAs into one of the eight possible temporal expression patterns.Results: The various patterns were found to be associated with different tumorigenic pathways. The dominant pattern identified an miRNA set that significantly differentiated between disease stages, and its pattern in each patient was also associated with response to therapy. These miRNAs were related to tumor proliferation and to the cell-cycle pathway, and their mRNA targets showed anticorrelated expression. Interestingly, the level of these miRNAs was lowest in matched recurrent samples from distant metastasis, indicating a gradual increase in proliferative potential through the course of disease. Finally, the average expression level of these miRNAs in the pretreatment biopsy was significantly different comparing patients experiencing recurrence to recurrence-free patients.Conclusions: Serial tumor sampling combined with analysis of temporal expression patterns enabled to pinpoint significant signatures characterizing breast cancer progression, associated with response to therapy and with risk of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res; 22(14); 3651–62. ©2016 AACR.

Purpose: Preclinical data suggest that exposure to PARP inhibitors (PARPi) may compromise benefit to subsequent chemotherapy, particularly platinum-based regimens, in patients with BRCA1/2 mutation carrier ovarian cancer (PBMCOC), possibly through the acquisition of secondary BRCA1/2 mutations. The efficacy of chemotherapy in the PARPi-resistant setting was therefore investigated.Experimental Design: We conducted a retrospective review of PBMCOC who received chemotherapy following disease progression on olaparib, administered at ≥200 mg twice daily for one month or more. Tumor samples were obtained in the post-olaparib setting where feasible and analyzed by massively parallel sequencing.Results: Data were collected from 89 patients who received a median of 3 (range 1–11) lines of pre-olaparib chemotherapy. The overall objective response rate (ORR) to post-olaparib chemotherapy was 36% (24 of 67 patients) by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) and 45% (35 of 78) by RECIST and/or Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) CA125 criteria with median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 17 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI), 13–21] and 34 weeks (95% CI, 26–42), respectively. For patients receiving platinum-based chemotherapy, ORRs were 40% (19 of 48) and 49% (26/53), respectively, with a median PFS of 22 weeks (95% CI, 15–29) and OS of 45 weeks (95% CI, 15–75). An increased platinum-to-platinum interval was associated with an increased OS and likelihood of response following post-olaparib platinum. No evidence of secondary BRCA1/2 mutation was detected in tumor samples of six PARPi-resistant patients [estimated frequency of such mutations adjusted for sample size: 0.125 (95%-CI: 0–0.375)].Conclusions: Heavily pretreated PBMCOC who are PARPi-resistant retain the potential to respond to subsequent chemotherapy, including platinum-based agents. These data support the further development of PARPi in PBMCOC. Clin Cancer Res; 19(19); 5485–93. ©2013 AACR.

Supplementary Methods, Tables 1-3, Figure 1 from Common Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles and the Risk of Breast Cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Implications for Risk Prediction

Emerging evidence reinforce the role of non-genetic adaptive resistance to chemotherapy, that involves rewiring of transcriptional programs in surviving tumors. We combined longitudinal transcriptomics with temporal pattern analysis to dissect patient-specific emergence of resistance in breast cancer. Matched triplets of tumor biopsies (pre-treatment, post-treatment and adjacent normal) were collected from breast cancer patients who received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Full transcriptome was analyzed by longitudinal pattern classification to follow patient-specific expression modulations. We found that dynamics of gene expression dictates resistance-related modulations. The results unraveled important principles in emergence of adaptive resistance: 1. Genes with resistance patterns are already dysregulated in the primary tumor, supporting a primed drug-tolerant state. 2. In each patient, multiple resistance-related genes are rewired but converge into few dysregulated modules. 3. Rewiring of diverse genes and pathway dysregulation vary among individuals who receive the same treatments. Patient-specific chemoresistome maps disclosed tumors’ acquired resistance and exposed their vulnerabilities.Mapping the complexity of dysregulated pathways in individual patients revealed important insights on adaptive resistance mechanisms. To survive the toxic drug effect, tumor cells either sustain a drug-tolerant state or intensify it, specifically bypassing the drug’s interference. Depicting an individual road map to resistance can offer personalized therapeutic strategies.

BACKGROUND: Addition of veliparib to carboplatin-paclitaxel, with continuation of veliparib monotherapy if carboplatin-paclitaxel was discontinued, improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with germline BRCA-associated locally advanced/metastatic HER2- breast cancer and ≤2 lines of previous cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease in BROCADE3. A pre-planned subgroup analysis evaluated efficacy and safety in patients without previous cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease. METHODS: Patients were randomised 2:1 to receive veliparib (120 mg orally BID) or placebo on days -2 to 5. Carboplatin (AUC 6) was administered on day 1, and paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) on days 1, 8 and 15 (21-day cycles). Patients discontinuing carboplatin-paclitaxel for reasons besides progression could continue veliparib/placebo monotherapy (300 mg BID, increasing to 400 mg BID if tolerated) until progression. The primary end-point was PFS assessed by investigator. RESULTS: Of 509 patients in the intention-to-treat population (98.6% female; mean age 47, standard deviation 11), 413 (81%) had no previous cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease (274, veliparib; 139, placebo). In the first-line subgroup, median PFS was 16.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 13.4-18.7) versus 13.1 months (95% CI 11.4-14.5) for the veliparib versus control groups (hazard ratio 0.70, 95% CI 0.54-0.89, P = .004). More patients were alive and progression-free at 2 years (36% versus 23.2%) and 3 years (27.9% versus 13.3%) in the veliparib versus control group. Adverse events unrelated to progression leading to study drug discontinuation occurred in 25 (9.1%) and 8 (5.8%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib with carboplatin-paclitaxel led to durable disease control among first-line patients, suggesting a benefit of this treatment approach in early lines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02163694. ispartof: European Journal Of Cancer vol:154 pages:35-45 ispartof: location:England status: accepted

Background In the KATHERINE study (NCT01772472), patients with residual invasive early breast cancer (EBC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted therapy had a 50% reduction in risk of recurrence or death with adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab. Here, we present additional exploratory safety and efficacy analyses. Patients and methods KATHERINE enrolled HER2-positive EBC patients with residual invasive disease in the breast/axilla at surgery after NACT containing a taxane (± anthracycline, ± platinum) and trastuzumab (± pertuzumab). Patients were randomized to adjuvant T-DM1 (n = 743) or trastuzumab (n = 743) for 14 cycles. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). Results The incidence of peripheral neuropathy (PN) was similar regardless of neoadjuvant taxane type. Irrespective of treatment arm, baseline PN was associated with longer PN duration (median, 105-109 days longer) and lower resolution rate (∼65% versus ∼82%). Prior platinum therapy was associated with more grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia in the T-DM1 arm (13.5% versus 3.8%), but there was no grade ≥3 hemorrhage in these patients. Risk of recurrence or death was decreased with T-DM1 versus trastuzumab in patients who received anthracycline-based NACT [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.38-0.67], non-anthracycline-based NACT (HR = 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.82), presented with cT1, cN0 tumors (0 versus 6 IDFS events), or had particularly high-risk tumors (HRs ranged from 0.43 to 0.72). The central nervous system (CNS) was more often the site of first recurrence in the T-DM1 arm (5.9% versus 4.3%), but T-DM1 was not associated with a difference in overall risk of CNS recurrence. Conclusions T-DM1 provides clinical benefit across patient subgroups, including small tumors and particularly high-risk tumors and does not increase the overall risk of CNS recurrence. NACT type had a minimal impact on safety.

BackgroundPoly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors target cancers with defects in homologous recombination repair by synthetic lethality. New therapies are needed to reduce recurrence in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation-associated early breast cancer.MethodsWe conducted a phase 3, double-blind, randomized trial involving patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative early breast cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants and high-risk clinicopathological factors who had received local treatment and neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to 1 year of oral olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival.ResultsA total of 1836 patients underwent randomization. At a prespecified event-driven interim analysis with a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the 3-year invasive disease-free survival was 85.9% in the olaparib group and 77.1% in the placebo group (difference, 8.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.5 to 13.0; hazard ratio for invasive disease or death, 0.58; 99.5% CI, 0.41 to 0.82; P

Purpose: Safety, efficacy, and exploratory biomarker analyses were evaluated in patients with advanced HER2-negative germline breast cancer susceptibility gene (gBRCA)-associated breast cancer enrolled in the BROCADE3 trial who received crossover veliparib monotherapy after disease progression on placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. Patients and Methods: Eligible patients (N = 513) were randomized 2:1 to veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel or placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel; patients had variable platinum-free intervals (PFI) at progression. In the placebo arm, patients were eligible to receive crossover veliparib monotherapy (300–400 mg twice daily continuous). Antitumor activity and adverse events were assessed during crossover veliparib treatment. BRCA reversion mutations at crossover were analyzed retrospectively using next-generation sequencing on plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Results: Seventy-five patients in the placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel arm received ≥1 dose of crossover veliparib postprogression (mean treatment duration: 154 days). Eight of 50 (16%) patients with measurable disease had a RECIST v1.1 response. Activity was greater in patients with PFI ≥180 days compared with Conclusions: Crossover veliparib monotherapy demonstrated limited antitumor activity in patients who experienced disease progression on placebo plus carboplatin/paclitaxel. PFI appeared to affect veliparib activity. BRCA reversion mutations may promote cross-resistance and limit veliparib activity following progression on platinum.

Background Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) has greatly improved survival for patients with a number of malignant diseases in recent years. Neurological immune-related adverse events (n-irAE) of varying severity have been reported in the literature. We aimed to identify the incidence of n-irAE, focusing on immune-related encephalitis (IRE), in patients treated with ICI for multiple non-hematological malignancies in our institution. Methods All patients with histologically verified cancer that received treatment with ICI at the Sheba Medical Center between January 2017 and August 2019 were surveyed. Medical records for each patient were reviewed and information regarding n-irAE was recorded. Results In total, 1993 patients were included. Eleven cases of IRE were recorded, affecting 0.55% of patients overall, eight had non-melanoma cancer. Eight patients had made a full recovery. Conclusions IRE is a n-irAE more frequent than previously reported, particularly in non-melanoma patients. The diagnostic criteria and optimal treatment needs to be determined. ICI re-challenge after IRE can be considered for selected patients.

Abnormal molecular processes occurring throughout the genome leave distinct somatic mutational patterns termed mutational signatures. Exploring the associations between mutational signatures and clinicopathological features can unravel potential mechanisms driving tumorigenic processes. We analyzed whole genome sequencing (WGS) data of tumor and peripheral blood samples from 37 primary breast cancer (BC) patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Comprehensive clinico-pathologic features were correlated with genomic profiles and mutational signatures. Somatic mutational landscapes were highly concordant with known BC data sets. Remarkably, we observed a divergence of dominant mutational signatures in association with BC subtype. Signature 5 was overrepresented in hormone receptor positive (HR+) patients, whereas triple-negative tumors mostly lacked Signature 5, but expectedly overrepresented Signature 3. We validated these findings in a large WGS data set of BC, demonstrating dominance of Signature 5 in HR+ patients, mostly in luminal A subtype. We further investigated the association between Signature 5 and gene expression signatures, and identified potential networks, likely related to estrogen regulation. Our results suggest that the yet elusive Signature 5 represents an alternative mechanism for mutation accumulation in HR+ BC, independent of the homologous recombination repair machinery related to Signature 3. This study provides theoretical basis for further elucidating the processes promoting hormonal breast carcinogenesis.

BACKGROUND: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors combined with immunotherapy have shown antitumour activity in preclinical studies. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of olaparib in combination with the PD-L1-inhibitor, durvalumab, in patients with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated metastatic breast cancer.METHODS: The MEDIOLA trial is a multicentre, open-label, phase 1/2, basket trial of durvalumab and olaparib in solid tumours. Patients were enrolled into four initial cohorts: germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic breast cancer; germline BRCA-mutated, metastatic ovarian cancer; metastatic gastric cancer; and relapsed small-cell lung cancer. Here, we report on the cohort of patients with breast cancer. Patients who were aged 18 years or older (or aged 19 years or older in South Korea) with germline BRCA1-mutated or BRCA2-mutated or both and histologically confirmed, progressive, HER2-negative, metastatic breast cancer were enrolled from 14 health centres in the UK, the USA, Israel, France, Switzerland, and South Korea. Patients should not have received more than two previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer. Patients received 300 mg olaparib in tablet form orally twice daily for 4 weeks and thereafter a combination of olaparib 300 mg twice daily and durvalumab 1·5 g via intravenous infusion every 4 weeks until disease progression. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability, and 12-week disease control rate. Safety was analysed in patients who received at least one dose of study treatment, and activity analyses were done in the full-analysis set (patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and were not excluded from the study). Recruitment has completed and the study is ongoing. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02734004.FINDINGS: Between June 14, 2016, and May 2, 2017, 34 patients were enrolled and received both study drugs and were included in the safety analysis. 11 (32%) patients experienced grade 3 or worse adverse events, of which the most common were anaemia (four [12%]), neutropenia (three [9%]), and pancreatitis (two [6%]). Three (9%) patients discontinued due to adverse events and four (12%) patients experienced a total of six serious adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths. 24 (80%; 90% CI 64·3-90·9) of 30 patients eligible for activity analysis had disease control at 12 weeks.INTERPRETATION: Combination of olaparib and durvalumab showed promising antitumour activity and safety similar to that previously observed in olaparib and durvalumab monotherapy studies. Further research in a randomised setting is needed to determine predictors of therapeutic benefit and whether addition of durvalumab improves long-term clinical outcomes compared with olaparib monotherapy.FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

In view of the relatively limited efficacy of immunotherapies targeting the PD-1–PD-L1 axis in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and of published reports on tumor-promoting roles of TNFR2+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TNFR2+ TILs), we determined the incidence of TNFR2+ TILs in TNBC patient tumors, their association with disease outcome and relations with PD-1+ TILs. Using a cohort of treatment-naive TNBC patients with long follow-up (n = 70), we determined the presence of TNFR2+ TILs and PD-1+ TILs by immunohistochemistry. TILs (≥ 1% of cellular mass) and TNFR2+ TILs (≥ 1% of total TILs) were detected in 96% and 74% of tumors, respectively. The presence of TILs at > 5% of tumor cell mass (“Positive TILs”), as well as of positive TNFR2+ TILs (> 5%), was independently associated with good prognosis, and combination of both parameters demonstrated superior outcome relative to their lower levels. PD1+ TILs (> 5/hot spot) were detected in 63% of patients. High levels of PD-1+ TILs (> 20/hot spot) showed an unfavorable disease outcome, and in their presence, the favorable outcome of positive TNFR2+ TILs was ablated. Thus, TNFR2+ TILs are strongly connected to improved prognosis in TNBC; these findings suggest that TNFR2+ TILs have favorable effects in TNBC patients, unlike the tumor-promoting roles attributed to them in other cancer systems. Overall, our observations propose that the TNFR2+ TIL subset should not be targeted in the course of TNBC therapy; rather, its beneficial impacts may become into power when anti-PD-1 regimens—that may potentiate immune activities—are administered to TNBC patients.

Background: Annual MRI screening is associated with a significant reduction in the incidence of advanced-stage breast cancer (BC) in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The purpose of our study was to assess stage at diagnosis and therapeutic approaches in BRCA1/2 carriers and compare these parameters in women who developed BC while adhering to the recommended surveillance scheme ("known carriers"), with BC cases who became aware of their BRCA carreirship after BC diagnosis ("latent carriers"). Methods: Retrospective data were collected on BRCA1/2 mutation carriers treated for BC at the Sheba medical center, both at the oncology institute and the high-risk clinic. The main variables evaluated were tumor characteristics, stage at diagnosis, and treatment decisions. Results: Overall, 529 BRCA1/2 carriers were identified. At the time of data summary, relevant clinical information was available for 297 patients. Median follow-up time was 77.4 months (range, 2.5-519). The group of known carriers included 95 women (median age at diagnosis 41.9 [range 27.8-80.3 years]), 70 (74%) were BRCA1 carriers, 23 (24%) BRCA2 carriers, and 2 (2.1%) carried mutations in both genes. The median age at diagnosis of 202 latent carriers was 43.7 (range 23.8-75 years), p=0.8284. Of latent carriers 117 (58%) were BRCA1 mutation carriers and 85 (42%) harbored a BRCA2 mutation. In the group of known carriers, 19% were diagnosed with carcinoma in situ (DCIS) vs. 5% in the group of latent carriers (p=00012). Stage T1N0 disease was diagnosed in 54/95 (56.8%) of known carriers vs. 59/202 (29.2%) of latent carriers (p Overall, in the group of known carriers (including all stages) 46/95 (48.4%) received neoadjuvant (n=12) or adjuvant (n=34) chemotherapy (71.7% of them for triple-negative disease), and 41/95 (43.2%) received radiotherapy. In the group of latent carriers, 162/202 (80.2%) received neoadjuvant (n=74) or adjuvant (n=88) chemotherapy (p Contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy (CRRM) was performed by 59/95 (62%) of the known carriers, 73% of them at the time of primary tumor resection and the rest – at a later stage. Among latent carriers, 82/202 (40.6%) underwent CRRM, 44% at the time of primary tumor resection (p=0.00054). Conclusions: As expected, diagnosis of early stage disease (DCIS or T1N0) was significantly higher in the group of known BRCA1/2 carriers - disease that was diagnosed in the course of tight surveillance. Yet, despite this early stage diagnosis, chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments were employed in a substantial proportion of these cases. Healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers should be informed about these chemotherapy and radiotherapy rates while discussing risk-reducing surgical options. There is an urgent need for a more accurate ability to predict individual mutation carrier cancer risk, as well as tools for selection of patients with stage I triple-negative disease who will do well without chemotherapy. Citation Format: Rinat Bernstein Molho, Bella Kaufman, Merav A Ben David, Miri Sklair-Levy, Yael Laitman, Eitan Friedman. Surveillance for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers - Is "early detection" really early enough? [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-10.

Background: The RS assay is widely used in ER+ HER2-negative BC to guide treatment decisions. In TAILORx, RS distribution was similar in blacks vs whites and in Hispanics vs non-Hispanics. Also, TAILORx analyses revealed similar results across ethnic groups with endocrine therapy being consistently noninferior to chemotherapy (CT) plus endocrine therapy in RS 11-25 pts. We investigated RS distribution among Jewish vs Arab/Druze pts who underwent RS testing through Clalit Health Services (CHS), the largest HMO in Israel, as well as differences in CT use and clinical outcomes between these 2 ethnic groups. Methods: The RS distribution analysis included all CHS pts (regardless of nodal status) who were tested between 1/2006 and 2/2019. For the clinical outcomes analysis, we employed a dataset used in prior analyses (Stemmer et al, poster# 249, SG-BCC 2019) of node-negative pts who were tested between 1/2006 and 12/2009, and as such, it is a subset of the cohort used for the RS distribution analysis. The study was approved by the IRB of the CHS Community Division and was granted a waiver for obtaining pt consent. Results: The RS distribution analysis involved 9054 pts who were tested in the evaluated timeframe and for whom RS results and ethnicity information were available. These included 8223 (91%) Jews and 831 (9%) Arabs/Druze, approximately reflecting the proportion of BC cases diagnosed in the respective ethnic groups. The 2 groups were similar in their baseline pt/tumor characteristics except for age and tumor size (Table). RS distribution was also similar between the 2 ethnic groups (Table). The subset of node-negative pts for whom treatment and clinical outcomes are known included 1274 (93%) Jewish pts and 91 (7%) Arab/Druze pts. In this subset, the only statistically significant difference in pt/tumor characteristics between the ethnic groups was age (median [interquartile range]) of 60 [53-66] yrs in the Jewish pts vs 55 [48-63] yrs in the Arab/Druze pts; P=.0004), similar to the complete cohort. The RS distribution was similar to that in the larger cohort, with no significant differences between the ethnic groups (P=.75). Also, CT use was consistent with the RS result in both ethnic groups, and was overall somewhat higher among Arab/Druze pts (25% vs 19%), due primarily to higher CT use among Arabs/Druze pts in the largest RS category (11-25), in which significant differences with respect to age were noted (median [interquartile range], 59 [52-66] yrs in Jewish pts vs 52 [46-61] yrs in Arab/Druze pts; P Conclusions: RS distribution and clinical outcomes were similar in Jewish and Arab/Druze BC pts. Arab/Druze pts undergoing RS testing were overall younger than the Jewish pts, which may suggest under-diagnosis and/or under-testing in the older Arab/Druze pt population. Also, CT use seemed higher in the Arab/Druze pt population, possibly reflecting the differences in the age distribution between these ethnic groups. Table: Patient/tumor characteristics by ethnicityJewsArabs/DruzeP valuen = 8223n = 831Female, n (%)8132 (98.9%)825 (99.3%).3Median (interquartile range) age, years62 (53-68)55 (48-64)1 - 2 cm4233 (51.5%)411 (49.5%)>22153 (26.2%)302 (36.3%)Unknown123 (1.5%)6 (0.7%)Tumor grade category, n (%).12Grade 11109 (13.4%)123 (14.8%)Grade 24192 (51.0%)443 (53.3%)Grade 31389 (16.9%)120 (14.4%)Not applicable/Unknown1533 (18.6%)145 (17.4%)Histology, n (%).92IDC6530 (79.4%)665 (80.0%)ILC1113 (13.5%)113 (13.6%)Papillary79 (1.0%)10 (1.2%)Mucinous/colloid144 (1.8%)16 (1.9%)Other/unknown357 (4.3%)27 (3.2%)Recurrence Score category, n (%).170-101612 (19.6%)176 (21.2%)11-255091 (61.9%)522 (62.8%)26-1001520 (18.5%)133 (16.0%) Citation Format: Gil Bar Sela, Yousef Samih, Rinat Yerushalmi, Michelle Leviov, Noa Efrat Ben-Baruch, Iryna Kuchuk, Margarita Tokar, Tamar Peretz, Amir L Sonnenblick, Lior Soussan-Gutman, Avital Bareket-Samish, Georgeta Fried, Shani Paluch-Shimon, Bella Kaufman, Ariel Hammerman, Nicky Liebermann, Salomon M Stemmer. Ethnicity, recurrence score (RS) distribution, and clinical outcomes in ER+ HER2-negative breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) in Israel [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-16.

Background: Veliparib (Vel) is a potent PARP1/2 inhibitor with demonstrated antitumor activity when administered alone or combined with carboplatin and paclitaxel (C/P). The phase 3 randomized, double-blind, multicenter BROCADE3 study (NCT02163694) evaluated the efficacy and safety of Vel + C/P treatment compared with placebo (Pbo) + C/P treatment in patients (pts) with germline BRCA1/2 mutations and HER2-negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer (BC). Vel + C/P significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) compared with Pbo + C/P treatment (14.5 months [mo] vs 12.6 mo, hazard ratio [HR]=0.71 [95% CI: 0.57, 0.88]; P=0.002). Previous studies have identified increased acute hematologic toxicity in response to chemotherapy in pts with BC carrying BRCA1 mutations compared with BRCA2 mutations or wildtype BRCA1/2. Herein we report a subgroup analysis of the efficacy and safety of Vel + C/P treatment in pts with BRCA1- or BRCA2-positive BC. Methods: Pts ≥18 years of age who received ≤2 prior lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease were randomized 2:1 to receive Vel + C/P or Pbo + C/P: Vel (120 mg PO BID) or Pbo on days -2 to 5, C (AUC 6 IV) on day 1, and P (80 mg/m2 IV) on days 1, 8, and 15 in 21-day cycles. Pts who discontinued C/P in the absence of disease progression could continue receiving Vel or Pbo monotherapy (300-400 mg BID continuous). Subgroup analysis of PFS stratified by BRCA1/2 status was preplanned. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to NCI CTCAE version 4.0. Ten pts with both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations were excluded from the analyses presented here. Results: In the intent-to-treat population, 256 pts had BRCA1 mutations and 243 pts had BRCA2 mutations. The proportion of as-treated pts with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations was comparable between the Vel + C/P (51.4% BRCA1, 48.6% BRCA2) and Pbo + C/P (50.9% BRCA1, 49.1% BRCA2) study arms. Investigator-assessed PFS for the Vel + C/P and Pbo + C/P arms was 14.2 mo vs 12.6 mo, respectively, in the BRCA1 subgroup (HR=0.75 [95% CI: 0.55, 1.03]; P=0.073) and 14.6 mo vs 12.6 mo, respectively, in the BRCA2 subgroup (HR=0.69 [95% CI: 0.50, 0.95]; P=0.021). Safety data in the as-treated population are presented in the Table. Regarding any grade AEs, thrombocytopenia and anemia were slightly more frequent in pts in the BRCA1 subgroup compared with the BRCA2 subgroup, whereas pts in the BRCA2 subgroup experienced slightly more frequent nausea, fatigue, and neuropathy. Conclusions: Globally, there was no clinically relevant difference in toxicity between BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups. Comparisons between treatment arms were generally consistent with findings in the overall study population, with more frequent thrombocytopenia and anemia of any grade reported in the Vel + C/P arm within both the BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups. Vel + C/P treatment improved PFS similarly in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 subgroups over C/P alone. BRCA1-Positive Subgroup (n=253)BRCA2-Positive Subgroup (n=241)Vel + C/P (n=168)Pbo + C/P (n=85)Vel + C/P (n=159)Pbo + C/P (n=82)Any grade AE [≥50% of pts], n (%)Any event167 (99.4)85 (100)158 (99.4)82 (100)Neutropenia151 (89.9)78 (91.8)140 (88.1)74 (90.2)Thrombocytopenia140 (83.3)66 (77.6)124 (78.0)54 (65.9)Anemia139 (82.7)64 (75.3)122 (76.7)52 (63.4)Nausea118 (70.2)49 (57.6)119 (74.8)58 (70.7)Alopecia89 (53.0)43 (50.6)89 (56.0)41 (50.0)Fatigue79 (47.0)37 (43.5)87 (54.7)48 (58.5)Peripheral sensory neuropathy69 (41.1)37 (43.5)82 (51.6)49 (59.8)Any grade ≥3 AE [≥30% of pts], n (%)Any event164 (97.6)82 (96.5)152 (95.6)77 (93.9)Anemia73 (43.5)31 (36.5)67 (42.1)35 (42.7)Leukopenia54 (32.1)20 (23.5)44 (27.7)25 (30.5)Neutropenia136 (81.0)72 (84.7)131 (82.4)67 (81.7)Thrombocytopenia72 (42.9)30 (35.3)59 (37.1)18 (22.0)Serious AEs, n (%)58 (34.5)26 (30.6)56 (35.2)22 (26.8)AEs of special interest, n (%)Infections within 14 days of neutropenia64 (38.1)34 (40.0)59 (37.1)25 (30.5)Hemorrhages within 14 days of thrombocytopenia14 (8.3)5 (5.9)17 (10.7)7 (8.5)Any AE leading to study drug discontinuation not due to disease progression, n (%)16 (9.5)5 (5.9)15 (9.4)4 (4.9)Any AE leading to study drug interruption, n (%)153 (91.1)77 (90.6)139 (87.4)67 (81.7)Any AE leading to study drug reduction, n (%)28 (16.7)6 (7.1)27 (17.0)7 (8.5)Any AE leading to death with reasonable possibility related to study drug, n (%)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)AE, adverse event; BRCA, breast cancer susceptibility gene; C/P, carboplatin plus paclitaxel; Pbo, placebo; pts, patients; Vel, veliparib. Citation Format: Hans Wildiers, Jean-Pierre Ayoub, Michael Friedlander, Bella Kaufman, Banu K. Arun, Hyo S. Han, Shannon L. Puhalla, David Maag, Dai Feng, Christine K. Ratajczak, Bruce A. Bach, Véronique Diéras. Safety and efficacy of veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer: A subgroup analysis of germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations from the phase 3 BROCADE3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS11-03.

Background PIK3CA mutations occur in approximately 40% of patients with hormone receptor (HR)–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–negative breast cancer. The PI3Kα-sp...

Background Women who carry germ-line mutations in BRCA1/2 are at very high risk of developing breast and ovarian cancer. Breast conserving therapy is associated with a similar risk of ipsilateral cancer recurrence in BRCA carriers compared with non-carriers. However, the risk of subsequent contralateral breast cancer in carriers is markedly increased. Therefore, mastectomy of the diseased breast along with risk reducing mastectomy of the contralateral breast is often advocated for BRCA carriers who are treated for early breast cancer. Yet, many BRCA carriers forgo this option for fear of harmful effects and choose breast conserving treatment and observation instead. In Israel, BRCA-associated breast cancer is relatively common. Accordingly, a national protocol was devised for this enriched population. Patients and methods In this Institutional Review Board-approved phase II trial, the option of prophylactic irradiation to the contralateral breast, in addition to standard loco-regional treatment, was offered to BRCA carrier patients treated for early breast cancer who declined contralateral mastectomy. The primary end point was contralateral breast cancer. Results Between May 2007 and October 2017, 162 patients were enrolled. Eighty-one patients opted for standard loco-regional treatment including surgery and radiation to the involved side (control arm) and 81 patients chose additional contralateral breast irradiation (intervention arm). At a median follow-up of 58 months, 10 patients developed contralateral breast cancer in the control arm at a median of 32 months, as compared with 2 patients in the intervention arm who developed contralateral breast cancer 80 and 105 months after bilateral breast irradiation (log-rank P = 0.011). Conclusions Among BRCA carrier patients treated for early breast cancer, the addition of contralateral breast irradiation was associated with a significant reduction of subsequent contralateral breast cancers and a delay in their onset. Clinical trial Phase II, comparative two-arm trial (NCT00496288).

Background: Hyperactivation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway can occur due to PIK3CA mutations, present in ~40% of patients (pts) with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2—) ABC. SOLAR-1, a Phase 3 randomized, double-blind trial (NCT02437318), investigated efficacy and safety of ALP (α-specific PI3K inhibitor) + FUL in pts with HR+, HER2— ABC. ALP+FUL met the primary endpoint by significantly extending progression-free survival (PFS) vs placebo (PBO) + FUL in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort (hazard ratio [HR] 0.65; 95% CI 0.50—0.85; p=0.00065; median 11.0 vs 5.7 months). Here we report overall survival (OS), subgroup data and safety in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort, and PFS by circulating tumor (ct)DNA PIK3CA mutation status in the total population. Methods: Enrollment was open to men/postmenopausal women with PIK3CA-mutant HR+, HER2— ABC and 1 prior line of endocrine therapy. Pts were randomized (1:1) to ALP (300mg/day) + FUL (500mg every 28 days and Cycle 1 Day 15) or PBO+FUL. OS was the key secondary endpoint. PFS was analyzed by PIK3CA mutant status in ctDNA, and in important prognostic subgroups, including line of treatment in ABC and prior cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i) use. Safety was analyzed in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort. Results: 341 pts in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort received ALP+FUL (n=169) or PBO+FUL (n=172). Median follow-up from randomization to data cut-off was 20.0 months. At data cut-off, 92 deaths had occurred (52% of the total 178 pts planned for final OS analysis); 40 for ALP+FUL (24%) and 52 for PBO+FUL (30%). OS results were immature at data cut-off (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.48—1.10; p=0.06; median not estimable vs 26.9 months). There was a 45% risk reduction in PFS for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutations (HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.39—0.79; n=186); 20% for pts without (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.60—1.06; n=363). PFS treatment effect for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL was generally consistent across subgroups of interest, with a risk reduction of 29% for pts receiving first-line (1L) treatment (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.49—1.03; n=177), and 39% for 2L treatment (HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.42—0.89; n=161); 52% in pts with prior CDK4/6i (HR 0.48; 95% CI 0.17—1.36; n=20) and 33% in pts without (HR 0.67; 95% CI 0.51—0.87; n=321). Most frequent all-grade adverse events (AEs; ≥40% in either arm by single preferred term; ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL) were hyperglycemia (65% vs 9%), diarrhea (54% vs 11%), nausea (46% vs 20%), and rash (40% vs 6%). Grade 3/4 AEs in ≥10% pts in either arm were hyperglycemia (fasting plasma glucose >250mg/dL; 37% for ALP+FUL vs Conclusions: ALP+FUL showed consistent clinically meaningful treatment benefit for pts with ctDNA PIK3CA mutant status, and across pt subgroups, including pts with/without prior treatment for ABC and prior CDK4/6i use. OS data were not yet mature at the data cut-off, but OS appeared numerically longer for ALP+FUL vs PBO+FUL after 52% of events. Key words: advanced breast cancer; PI3K; alpelisib; endocrine therapy Citation Format: Juric D, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, Campone M, Loibl S, Rugo HS, Iwata H, Conte P, Mayer IA, Kaufman B, Yamashita T, Lu Y-S, Inoue K, Takahashi M, Pápai Z, Longin A-S, Mills D, Wilke C, Sellami D, Andre F. Alpelisib + fulvestrant for advanced breast cancer: Subgroup analyses from the phase III SOLAR-1 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS3-08.

Background Activation of the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) pathway via PIK3CA mutations occurs in 28%-46% of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancers (ABCs) and is associated with poor prognosis. The SOLAR-1 trial showed that the addition of alpelisib to fulvestrant treatment provided statistically significant and clinically meaningful progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2− ABC. Patients and methods Men and postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC whose disease progressed on or after aromatase inhibitor (AI) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive alpelisib (300 mg/day) plus fulvestrant (500 mg every 28 days and once on day 15) or placebo plus fulvestrant. Overall survival (OS) in the PIK3CA-mutant cohort was evaluated by Kaplan–Meier methodology and a one-sided stratified log-rank test was carried out with an O'Brien–Fleming efficacy boundary of P ≤ 0.0161. Results In the PIK3CA-mutated cohort (n = 341), median OS [95% confidence interval (CI)] was 39.3 months (34.1-44.9) for alpelisib-fulvestrant and 31.4 months (26.8-41.3) for placebo-fulvestrant [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.86 (95% CI, 0.64-1.15; P = 0.15)]. OS results did not cross the prespecified efficacy boundary. Median OS (95% CI) in patients with lung and/or liver metastases was 37.2 months (28.7-43.6) and 22.8 months (19.0-26.8) in the alpelisib-fulvestrant and placebo-fulvestrant arms, respectively [HR = 0.68 (0.46-1.00)]. Median times to chemotherapy (95% CI) for the alpelisib-fulvestrant and placebo-fulvestrant arms were 23.3 months (15.2-28.4) and 14.8 months (10.5-22.6), respectively [HR = 0.72 (0.54-0.95)]. No new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. Conclusions Although the analysis did not cross the prespecified boundary for statistical significance, there was a 7.9-month numeric improvement in median OS when alpelisib was added to fulvestrant treatment of patients with PIK3CA-mutated, HR+, HER2− ABC. Overall, these results further support the statistically significant prolongation of PFS observed with alpelisib plus fulvestrant in this population, which has a poor prognosis due to a PIK3CA mutation. ClinicalTrials.gov Id NCT02437318.

Current international guidelines, including the Choosing Wisely Initiative, recommends against the routine use of systemic imaging studies or tumor markers in early-stage breast cancer. Accumulating data suggests that adherence to these guidelines is low. We aimed to investigate the execution of unnecessary diagnostic tests among Israeli breast cancer patients and identify factors associated with their performance.A retrospective analysis was conducted involving a database of early breast cancer patients treated at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center. A survey was distributed among Israeli surgeons and oncologists specializing in breast cancer treatment.The study included early breast cancer patients (n = 178), who have no indication for completing systemic evaluation. Nearly half of the patients (76, 42%) were referred to 128 unjustified diagnostic studies, with the most common referral comprising a PET-CT (n = 39 30.5%). As expected, none of the tests led to any change in either disease staging or alteration in clinical management. Variables associated with systemic evaluation included younger age (61.8% for 50 years vs 38.9% for 50 years, p = 0.02), diagnosis by palpable mass compared to screening mammography (26.9% vs 52.9% p = 0.043, respectively) and higher tumor grade (33.7% vs 52.2% p = 0.02, respectively). In concordance with the findings of the database, the physicians' survey revealed low adherence to guidelines and a role of the treating physicians' subjective feelings. Doctors were more likely to recommend unnecessary studies when presented with a clinical case as an image, than to an informative question.Our data indicate a high rate of non-adherence to guidelines, physicians recommending extensive systemic evaluation for women with early breast cancer. These deviations from the guidelines are associated with subjective factors, some of them being physician-dependent. Initiatives aimed at improving adherence to guidelines, and specifically to guidelines recommending "doing less" should therefore include not just knowledge-based education but also encourage conversation about what is appropriate and necessary.

Purpose In the Breast cancer trials of OraL EveROlimus-2 (BOLERO-2) trial, everolimus plus exemestane improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) recurring or progressing on/after prior endocrine therapy (ET), suggesting that dual blockade using targeted therapy and ET was an effective treatment option. Here, we investigated the clinical benefit of combining everolimus with different endocrine partner, letrozole, in a similar patient population. Methods In this phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter trial, postmenopausal women with HR+, HER2− ABC who had recurrence/progression on/after prior ET received everolimus 10 mg daily and letrozole 2.5 mg daily. The primary end point was objective response rate; key secondary end points included disease-control rate, PFS, overall survival, and safety. Results A total of 72 patients were enrolled and followed-up for a median duration of 11.4 months. Everolimus plus letrozole achieved an overall response rate of 23.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.4%-36.0%). The median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 6.6-11.0 months), and the overall survival was 22.9 months (95% CI, 18.5-28.9 months). Disease-control rate was achieved in 51 (85%) patients. The safety profile was consistent with previously published data: The most frequently reported any grade adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (61.1%), stomatitis (54.2%), and rash (33.4%). The most frequently reported grade 3 AEs were stomatitis and anemia (8.3% each), fatigue and diarrhea (5.6% each), and hyperglycemia (4.2%). Only 1 patient had grade 4 AE of anemia. Conclusions Everolimus plus letrozole demonstrated clinical benefit and could be a valid treatment option for postmenopausal women recurring/progressing on prior endocrine therapy.

Background Olaparib is a potent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, with first-in-class approval (400 mg capsules BID) for BRCA-mutated advanced ovarian cancer. Olaparib was recently found to be superior compared with chemotherapy in HER2-negative gBRCAm MBC in the Phase III OlympiAD trial. Olaparib induces DNA damage and genomic instability in gBRCAm tumors, which is hypothesized to result in enhanced immunogenicity. Here, we assess if a combination of olaparib and an anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) agent, durvalumab, leads to enhanced antitumor activity in one of the four cohorts (NCT02734004). Methods Individuals with deleterious gBRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and HER2-negative MBC were eligible. Patients with prior platinum therapy were allowed to enter if they had not experienced disease progression on platinum. No more than two prior lines of chemotherapy were allowed for metastatic disease, and patients with hormone receptor (HR) positive disease had to have at least one line of prior endocrine therapy. Concomitant use of endocrine therapy was not allowed. All patients received olaparib tablets 300 mg PO BID for a 4-week run-in, followed by a combination of olaparib 300 mg PO BID and durvalumab 1.5 g IV q 4 weeks. The combination was continued until progressive disease (PD) by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Tumor assessments were done at baseline, 4 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) at 12 weeks, and safety and tolerability of the combination. The secondary endpoints included DCR at 28 weeks, objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Biomarker endpoints included PD-L1 expression and evaluation of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. Olaparib monotherapy has previously demonstrated a median PFS (mPFS) of 6 months in this patient population, and addition of durvalumab was predicted to increase the mPFS to 7.5 months, corresponding to a target DCR of 75% at 12 weeks. This was achievable by enrolling 30 patients using a Bayesian predictive probability design. Results of the first 25 patients are presented. Results Median age was 46 years (range 29−66); 11 and 14 patients had BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, respectively; 13 patients had HR positive disease, and nine had previously received platinum therapy. Median number of prior chemotherapy lines was 1 (range 0-4). Grade 3 or higher adverse events (AEs) were anemia (8%), neutropenia (8%), hemolysis (4%), dyspnea (4%), pancreatitis (4%), fatigue (4%), lymphopenia (4%) and leukopenia (4%). There was one grade 5 AE (dyspnea), which was attributed to disease progression. Observed DCR at 12 weeks was 80%. Eight confirmed responses and five unconfirmed responses were seen. The updated results from primary and secondary endpoints, including DCR at 28 weeks, as well as biomarker and PK data, will be presented. Conclusions The combination of olaparib and durvalumab was well tolerated, with no apparent overlapping toxicities. The efficacy of the combination at an early time point reached the target DCR in gBRCAm HER2-negative MBC, and warrants further investigation. Citation Format: Domchek SM, Postel-Vinay S, Bang Y-J, Park YH, Alexandre J, Delord J-P, Italiano A, You B, Bastian S, Krebs M, Wang D, Waqar S, Angell H, Learoyd M, Chang S-C, Gresty C, Herbolsheimer P, Kaufman B. An open-label, multitumor, phase II basket study of olaparib and durvalumab (MEDIOLA): Results in germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-11.

Background: Olaparib (Lynparza®) is a PARP inhibitor that alters the repair of single-strand DNA breaks. Durvalumab (Imfinzi®) is a monoclonal antibody against programmed cell death ligand 1 (anti-PD-L1) that promotes antitumor immune responses. MEDIOLA (NCT02734004) is a Ph I/II open-label, multicenter study enrolling patients (pts) across several tumor types (small-cell lung cancer, gastric cancer, germline BRCA-mutated [gBRCAm] BC, or platinum sensitive relapsed gBRCAm ovarian cancer). 34 pts with gBRCAm BC received olaparib 300 mg po bid for a 4-wk run-in, followed by olaparib 300 mg po bid and durvalumab 1.5 g IV q4 wks. Encouraging preliminary results support an expansion cohort in a BRCAm popn. Evidence suggests that mutations in other homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes may confer a BRCA-like phenotype, warranting an expansion of the study population beyond BRCAm. Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been reported to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy in TNBC. In addition, VEGF inhibition potentiates PARP inhibitor activity, particularly in pts who do not carry BRCAm. Combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors and bevacizumab, an anti-VEGF-A antibody, have shown promising results in other tumor types. Thus, MEDIOLA will additionally explore the efficacy and safety of olaparib + durvalumab in combination with bevacizumab in TNBC pts. Trial design: Pts in the additional MBC cohorts will receive combination olaparib and durvalumab with no olaparib run-in. Pts in the TNBC cohort will also receive concurrent bevacizumab 10 mg/kg q 2 wks. Tumor assessments will be performed at baseline and every 8 wks thereafter. Eligibility criteria: Pts with histologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic HER2-neg BC, who are PARP-inhibitor and immunotherapy naïve. Prior anthracycline and/or taxane therapy in early or MBC is required. Prior platinum therapy is allowed, if there was no disease progression while receiving treatment and at least 12 mths has elapsed since the last dose. Pts will undergo BRCA and HRR mutation testing and will be assigned to a cohort based on their mutation status, as illustrated in Table 1. Specific aims: Cohort-specific primary efficacy endpoint targets were calculated aiming for superiority to standard of care treatment (Table 1). Other primary outcomes are safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints are PK, DCR at 24 wks, objective response rate, duration of response, progression-free survival and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints include the analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression. Statistical methods: The expansion cohort will have a single-stage statistical design. Bayesian predictive probability design will be used for the analysis of the HRRm and TNBC triplet cohorts. Accrual: Accrual targets are shown in Table 1. First subject will be enrolled in Nov 2018. New MEDIOLA BC cohortsCohort nameTarget accrualDrugsPopnPrimary endpointBreast BRCAm expansion80Olap+DurvHER2-neg, tBRCAmORR 70%Breast HRRm cohort29Olap+DurvHER2-neg, non BRCAm, HRRm-posDCR at 16 wks 80%TNBC triplet cohort30Olap+Durv+BevTNBC, non BRCAm, non HRRmDCR at 16 wks 80%Bev, bevacizumab; durv, durvalumab; olap, olaparib Citation Format: Domchek SM, Postel-Vinay S, Im S-A, Hee Park Y, Delord J-P, Italiano A, Alexandre J, You B, Bastian S, Krebs MG, Waqar S, Lanasa M, Angell HK, Tang M, Gresty C, Opincar L, Herbolsheimer P, Kaufman B. MEDIOLA: An open-label, phase I/II basket study of olaparib (PARP inhibitor) and durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody)–Additional breast cancer cohorts [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-05-03.

Population screening of three common BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) apparently fulfills screening criteria. We compared streamlined BRCA screening via self-referral with proactive recruitment in medical settings.Unaffected AJ, age ≥25 years without known familial mutations, were either self-referred or recruiter-enrolled. Before testing, participants received written information and self-reported family history (FH). After testing, both non-carriers with significant FH and carriers received in-person genetic counseling. Psychosocial questionnaires were self-administered 1 week and 6 months after enrollment.Of 1,771 participants, 58% were recruiter-enrolled and 42% were self-referred. Screening uptake was 67%. Recruited enrollees were older (mean age 54 vs. 48, P0.001) and had less suggestive FH (23 vs. 33%, P0.001). Of 32 (1.8%) carriers identified, 40% had no significant FH. Post-test counseling compliance was 100% for carriers and 89% for non-carrier women with FH. All groups expressed high satisfaction (90%). At 6 months, carriers had significantly increased distress and anxiety, greater knowledge, and similar satisfaction; 90% of participants would recommend general AJ BRCA screening.Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations.Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016.

Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors block DNA damage repair and may thereby enhance the clinical activity of DNA-damaging chemotherapy. Homologous recombination is defective in BRCA1/2-mutated tumors, leading to more error-prone mechanisms of DNA repair and increased sensitivity to PARP inhibition. V is a potent PARP inhibitor that enhances the antitumor activity of platinum agents in preclinical models. This phase 2 trial (NCT01506609) investigated the safety and efficacy of V+C/P or V+ temozolomide (TMZ) vs Plc+C/P in pts with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Results of the V+C/P and Plc+C/P arms are presented; V+TMZ results will be presented separately. Methods: Pts ≥18 years with histologically confirmed locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer were randomized 1:1:1 to: 1) V 40 mg BID D1–7+TMZ, 28-D cycle; 2) V 120 mg BID D1–7+C AUC 6, D3 and P 175 mg/m2, D3, 21-D cycle; or 3) Plc BID D1–7+C/P. Key eligibility criteria included deleterious BRCA1/2 mutation, ≤2 prior chemotherapies for metastatic disease, no prior platinum agent, and no CNS metastases. Randomization was stratified by hormone receptor status, prior cytotoxic therapy, and ECOG PS. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST 1.1 of each V arm vs Plc+C/P by independent review. Primary analysis occurred at the 112th PFS event in the V+C/P and Plc+C/P arms. Overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), tolerability, and quality of life were also evaluated. Results: A total of 196 pts (193 BRCA+ per central lab) were randomized to receive double-blinded V+C/P (n=97) or Plc+C/P (n=99). Baseline demographics and disease characteristics were balanced across all treatment arms. Median study drug exposure was 10 cycles for Plc+C/P and 12 cycles for V+C/P. The V+C/P arm demonstrated numeric improvements for both PFS and OS compared to the Plc+C/P arm; improvement in ORR was statistically significant (Table 1). There was no meaningful increase of toxicity with addition of V. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) with Plc+C/P or V+C/P were neutropenia (74%/74%), thrombocytopenia (70%/71%), and nausea (58%/71%). Grade ≥3 AEs in ≥30% of pts were neutropenia (55%/56%) and thrombocytopenia (26%/31%), respectively. There was no difference in the use of G-CSF with addition of V. Significant improvements in fatigue, pain, and insomnia (all P Conclusions: This is the first randomized phase 2 trial of a PARP inhibitor in combination with platinum-based therapy for treatment of BRCA1/2-mutated advanced breast cancer. V+C/P demonstrated significantly higher ORR and symptom improvement compared to Plc+C/P, with nonsignificant trends for improved OS and PFS. Phase 3 trials are ongoing. Table 1Efficacy (ITT population – BRCA mutation)Plc+C/P, n=98V+C/P, n=95HR (95% CI); P valuePFS(mo, 95% CI)12.3 (9.3–14.5)14.1 (11.5–16.2)0.789 (0.536–1.162); 0.231OS (mo, 95% CI)25.0 (18.1–34.8)28.5 (22.4–NR)0.725 (0.468–1.121); 0.148ORR, % (95% CI)61.3 (49.7–71.9)77.8 (66.4–86.7)P=0.027 Citation Format: Han HS, Diéras V, Robson ME, Palácová M, Marcom PK, Jager A, Bondarenko I, Citrin D, Campone M, Telli ML, Domchek SM, Friedlander M, Kaufman B, Ratajczak C, Coates A, Bonnet P, Qin Q, Qian J, Giranda VL, Shepherd SP, Isakoff SJ, Puhalla S. Efficacy and tolerability of veliparib (V; ABT-888) in combination with carboplatin (C) and paclitaxel (P) vs placebo (Plc)+C/P in patients (pts) with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and metastatic breast cancer: A randomized, phase 2 study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2016 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2016 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(4 Suppl):Abstract nr S2-05.

Veliparib is an orally administered poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that is being studied in Phase I–III clinical trials, including Phase III studies in non-small-cell lung cancer, ovarian cancer and breast cancer. Tumor cells with deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations are deficient in homologous recombination DNA repair and are intrinsically sensitive to platinum therapy and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We describe herein the design and rationale of a Phase II trial investigating whether the addition of veliparib to temozolomide or carboplatin/paclitaxel provides clinical benefit over carboplatin/paclitaxel with placebo in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer harboring a deleterious BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation (Trial registration: EudraCT 2011-002913-12, NCT01506609).

Carriers of pathogenic variants (PVs) in moderate–high-penetrance cancer susceptibility genes are offered tailored surveillance schemes for early cancer diagnosis. The clinical implications of low-penetrance variant carriers are less clear. Clinical and demographic data were retrieved for a cohort of Israeli individuals who underwent oncogenetic testing by the 30-gene cancer panel at Color Genomics laboratory, between 04/2013 and 12/2018. Of 758 genotyped individuals, 504 had been diagnosed with cancer prior to testing: 283 (56%) had breast cancer and 106 (21%) colorectal cancer. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants were detected in 123 (16%) individuals. Overall, 44 different P/LP variants were detected in 18/30 cancer susceptibility genes; 20 of them were founder/recurrent mutations. Of the carriers, 39 (32%), 10 (8%), and 74 (60%) carried high-, moderate-, or low-penetrance variants, respectively. After excluding low-penetrance variants, 7% (33/504) of all cancer patients, 6% of breast or ovarian cancer patients were found to be carriers, as well as 7% (14/203) of individuals with colonic polyps, and 4% (11/254) of cancer-free individuals. The diagnostic yield of moderate- and high-penetrance PVs using multigene panel testing was 6%, with 3.7% carriers of non-recurrent PVs. This yield should be discussed during pre-test counseling, and emphasizes the need for harmonized recommendations regarding clinical implications of low-penetrance variants.

Young women with breast cancer are more likely to harbor a germline mutation predisposing them to cancer. The most common germline mutations among young women with breast cancer are BRCA1 and BRCA2. BRCA-associated breast cancers have unique characteristics, and BRCA1-associated tumors are more often triple-negative or basal subtype and high grade, while BRCA2-associated tumors are more commonly endocrine responsive. BRCA-associated tumors are often highly chemo-sensitive and are particularly susceptible to platinum agents and PARP inhibitors. The therapeutic impact of a germline mutation in other cancer predisposition genes is still being evaluated.

Background Annual MRI screening is associated with a significant reduction in advanced-stage breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. The impact that early detection has on subsequent oncological treatment is less frequently reported. In this study we compared disease stage and therapeutic approaches in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers who developed breast cancer while adhering to the recommended surveillance scheme (“known carriers”), with women who became aware of their BRCA mutation status after breast cancer diagnosis (“latent carriers"). Methods Data on tumor characteristics, disease stage, and therapeutic decisions were collected on BRCA1/2 mutation carriers treated for breast cancer at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center. Results Data were available for 298 BRCA1/2 carriers. Median follow-up was 77.4 months (range, 3.5–520). Age at diagnosis was not statistically different between known carriers (n = 96; median age at diagnosis 44.7 years) and latent carriers (n = 202; 43.7 years); p = 0.8284. Of known carriers, 19.8% were diagnosed with carcinoma in situ vs. 5% of latent carriers (p = 0.0012). Stage T1N0 disease was diagnosed in 54/96 (56.3%) of known carriers vs. 59/202 (29.2%) of latent carriers (p, Highlights • Annual MRI screening is recommended to healthy BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. • Intensive surveillance enables breast cancer diagnosis at early stages. • In this study ∼50% of early stage diagnosed patients received chemotherapy. • This rate should be discussed with BRCA carriers considering risk-reducing options.

Background Emerging mutations in the ESR1 gene that encodes for the estrogen receptor (ER) are associated with resistance to endocrine therapy. ESR1 mutations rarely exist in primary tumors (~ 1%) but are relatively common (10–50%) in metastatic, endocrine therapy-resistant cancers and are associated with a shorter progression-free survival. Little is known about the incidence and clinical implication of these mutations in early recurrence events, such as local recurrences or newly diagnosed metastatic disease. Methods We collected 130 archival tumor samples from 103 breast cancer patients treated with endocrine therapy prior to their local/metastatic recurrence. The cohort consisted of 41 patients having at least 1 sample from local/loco-regional recurrence and 62 patients with metastatic disease (of whom 41 newly diagnosed and 28 with advanced disease). The 5 most common ESR1 hotspot mutations (D538G, L536R, Y537S/N/C) were analyzed either by targeted sequencing or by droplet digital PCR. Progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), and distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) were statistically tested by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results The prevalence of ESR1 mutations was 5/41 (12%) in newly diagnosed metastatic patients and 5/28 (18%) for advanced metastases, detected at allele frequency > 1%. All mutations in advanced metastases were detected in patients previously treated with both tamoxifen (TAM) and aromatase inhibitors (AI). However, in newly diagnosed metastatic patients, 4/5 mutations occurred in patients treated with TAM alone. PFS on AI treatment in metastatic patients was significantly shorter for ESR1 mutation carriers (p = 0.017). In the local recurrence cohort, ESR1 mutations were identified in 15/41 (36%) patients but only 4/41 (10%) were detected at allele frequency > 1%. Again, most mutations (3/4) were detected under TAM monotherapy. Notably, 1 patient developed ESR1 mutation while on neoadjuvant endocrine therapy. DFS and DRFS were significantly shorter (p = 0.04 and p = 0.017, respectively) in patients that had ESR1 mutations (> 1%) in their loco-regional recurrence tumor. Conclusions Clinically relevant ESR1 mutations are prevalent in newly diagnosed metastatic and local recurrence of endocrine-treated breast cancer. Since local recurrences are amenable to curative therapy, these mutations may inform the selection of subsequent endocrine therapies.

LBA1 Background: PARP inhibitors (PARPi) target cancers with homologous recombination repair defects by synthetic lethality. The PARPi olaparib (OL) is licensed for metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 germline mutation (gBRCAm). Despite (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy ([N]ACT), recurrence rates in patients (pts) with gBRCAm early breast cancer (EBC) can be high. Novel adjuvant treatments are needed. Methods: OlympiA (NCT02032823), a randomized, double-blind, phase III study, enrolled pts with gBRCAm and HER2-negative (TNBC or hormone-receptor+ [HR+]) high-risk EBC after primary local treatment and ACT/NACT. Eligible pts with TNBC had ≥pT2 or ≥pN1 disease prior to ACT or non-pCR after NACT; those with HR+ BC had ≥4 positive nodes prior to ACT or non-pCR and CPS&EG score ≥3 after NACT. Pts were randomized 1:1 to 1 year of continuous oral OL (300 mg BID) or placebo (PL). Endocrine therapy and bisphosphonates were allowed. The primary endpoint was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) in the ITT population. Secondary endpoints included distant DFS (DDFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Safety analysis included adverse events of special interest (AESI) (myelodysplastic syndrome/ acute myeloid leukemia, new primary malignancy, pneumonitis). Per protocol IDMC interim analysis (IA) review was triggered at 165 IDFS events in the first 900 pts, with superiority boundaries based on a hierarchical multiple testing procedure: P < 0.005 for IDFS, followed by P < 0.005 for DDFS and p1% of OL pts were; anemia (8.7%), neutropenia (4.8%), leukopenia (3.0%), fatigue (1.8%), and lymphocytopenia (1.2%). SAEs and AESI were not increased by OL, SAE 8.7% vs 8.4% and AESI 3.3% vs 5.1%, OL vs PL respectively. Conclusions: Adjuvant OL following ACT or NACT significantly improved IDFS and DDFS with acceptable toxicity in pts with gBRCAm and high-risk HER2-negative EBC. Clinical trial information: NCT02032823.

Background: The PARP inhibitor olaparib (Lynparza (TM)) demonstrates antitumor activity in women with relapsed ovarian cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Data from olaparib monotherapy trials were used to explore the treatment effect of olaparib in patients with gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received multiple lines of prior chemotherapy. This analysis evaluated pooled data from two phase I trials [NCT00516373 (study 2); NCT00777582 (study 24)] and four phase II trials [NCT00494442 (study 9); NCT00628251 (study 12); NCT00679783 (study 20); NCT01078662 (study 42)] that recruited women with relapsed ovarian, fallopian tube or peritoneal cancer. All patients had a documented gBRCAm and were receiving olaparib 400 mg monotherapy twice daily (capsule formulation) at the time of relapse. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) were evaluated using original patient outcomes data for patients with measurable disease at baseline. Of the 300 patients in the pooled population, 273 had measurable disease at baseline, of whom 205 (75%) had received a parts per thousand yen3 lines of prior chemotherapy. In the pooled population, the ORR was 36% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30-42] and the median DoR was 7.4 months (95% CI 5.7-9.1). The ORR among patients who had received a parts per thousand yen3 lines of prior chemotherapy was 31% (95% CI 25-38), with a DoR of 7.8 months (95% CI 5.6-9.5). The safety profile of olaparib was similar in patients who had received a parts per thousand yen3 lines of prior chemotherapy compared with the pooled population; grade a parts per thousand yen3 adverse events were reported in 54% and 50% of patients, respectively. Durable responses to olaparib were observed in patients with relapsed gBRCAm ovarian cancer who had received a parts per thousand yen3 lines of prior chemotherapy. NCT00516373; NCT00494442; NCT00628251; NCT00679783; NCT00777582; NCT01078662.

The purpose of this study was to assess pathological complete response and whether it serves a surrogate for survival among patients receiving neo-adjuvant doxorubicin–cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel for triple-negative breast cancer with respect to BRCA1 mutation status. From a neo-adjuvant systemic therapy database of 588 breast cancer cases, 80 triple-negative cases who had undergone BRCA genotyping were identified. Logistic regression model was fitted to examine the association between BRCA1 status and pathological complete response. Survival outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan–Meier method, differences between study groups calculated by log-rank test. Thirty-four BRCA1 carriers and 43 non-carriers were identified. The BRCA1 carriers had pathological complete response rate of 68 % compared with 37 % among non-carriers, p = 0.01. Yet this did not translate into superior survival for BRCA1 carriers compared with non-carriers. No difference in relapse-free survival were noted among those with or without pathological complete response in BRCA1 carriers regardless of pathological complete response status (Log-rank p = 0.25), whereas in the non-carrier cohort, relapse-free survival was superior for those achieving pathological complete response (Log-rank p < 0.0001). Response to neo-adjuvant systemic therapy differed in BRCA1-associated triple-negative breast cancer compared with triple-negative non-carriers, with a higher rate of pathological complete response. However, compared with non-carrier triple-negative breast cancer, pathological complete response was not a surrogate for superior relapse-free survival in BRCA1 patients. Future studies using specific chemotherapy regimens may provide further improvements in outcomes.

Background: The 21-Gene Recurrence Score® Assay (Oncotype DX®) has been validated as a prognostic and predictive tool in estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer in multiple studies using archival specimens of clinical trials with long term follow up. Prospective outcome data from patients where treatment decisions incorporated the Recurrence Score results have not been reported. We evaluated treatments and clinical outcomes in patients undergoing Recurrence Score testing in 9 medical centers within Clalit Health Services (CHS), the largest HMO in Israel. Methods: Medical records of patients with N0/Nmic ER+ HER2-negative disease undergoing testing from 12/2004 to 12/2010 in 9 medical centers (Rabin, Lin, Soroka, Meir, Kaplan, Hadassah, Ha'emek, Rambam, and Shaare Zedek) within CHS were individually reviewed to verify treatments given, recurrence, and survival status. 5-year Kaplan-Meier (KM) and standard error estimates for distant recurrence and breast cancer specific survival were determined. Results: 1594 patients were evaluated with 5.9 years median follow-up. Median age, 61 (25-85) years; N0/Nmic (90%/10%); Grade I (16%), II (48%), III (16%), N/A (19%); histology, IDC (80%), lobular (13%), other (7%). Distribution of Recurrence Score risk groups (Recurrence Score results of Conclusions: These are the first prospective long term clinical outcome data from approximately 1600 patients for whom the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay has been incorporated in real-life clinical decision making. The documented use of CT was appropriately based on the Recurrence Score result, and the outcomes for recurrence and survival are consistent with previously reported prospective-retrospective studies of the 21-gene assay. The 5 year KM estimates for distant recurrence rate in patients with low and intermediate Recurrence Score results who were treated based upon their Recurrence Score results were very low (0.5% and 1.2%, respectively). Citation Format: Stemmer SM, Steiner M, Rizel S, Soussan-Gutman L, Geffen DB, Nisenbaum B, Ben-Baruch N, Isaacs K, Fried G, Rosengarten O, Uziely B, Svedman C, Rothney M, Klang SH, Ryvo L, Kaufman B, Evron E, Zidan J, Shak S, Liebermann N. Real-life analysis evaluating 1594 N0/Nmic breast cancer patients for whom treatment decisions incorporated the 21-gene recurrence score result: 5-year KM estimate for breast cancer specific survival with recurrence score results ≤30 is >98%. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-08-02.

1097 Background: In BROCADE3 (NCT02163694), addition of the PARP inhibitor (PARPi) V to CP improved PFS in patients (pts) with g BRCA-associated advanced breast cancer (hazard ratio 0.71 [95% CI 0.57–0.88], p = 0.002). Reversion mutations may account for resistance to platinum-based CT and PARPi. Efficacy, safety, and exploratory biomarker analyses for pts randomized to PL + CP who received crossover (Cx) V monotherapy after progression are reported. Methods: 513 total pts were randomized 2:1 to V + CP or PL + CP. V/PL, C, and P could be discontinued independently prior to progression, leading to varying platinum-free intervals at the time of progression. After progression, pts in the PL + CP arm could receive open-label Cx V monotherapy (300–400 mg BID continuous), beginning within 60 d of progression and continuing to second progression. Adverse events (AEs) and activity during Cx V were assessed. Exploratory analysis of BRCA reversion mutations restoring BRCA1/2 protein function that emerged during PL + CP treatment was performed on plasma circulating tumor DNA using targeted-amplicon next generation sequencing. Results: At data cutoff, 75 pts initially randomized to PL + CP had ≥1 dose of Cx V. Mean (range) duration of Cx V was 154 d (2–966). Activity during Cx V is in the Table. Mean (range) platinum-free interval at time of first dose of Cx V was 3.1 mos (0.4–10.9) vs 8.1 mos (1.0–34.9) in pts who had progressed vs had not progressed by 24 wks after first dose of Cx V. BRCA reversion analysis was completed for 18 Cx pts. Reversion mutations were identified in 1/18 pts (5.6%). This patient had Cx V duration of 19 d and had progressed by 24 wks. BRCA reversion analysis on additional Cx pts will be presented. Most common AEs during Cx V were nausea (61%), vomiting (29%), fatigue (24%), and diarrhea (21%). Any grade anemia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia occurred in 7%, 15%, and 7% of pts. Three pts (4%) experienced a convulsion event. Conclusions: Platinum-free interval may influence efficacy of subsequent PARPi. Impact of BRCA reversion mutations warrants further evaluation. Cross-resistance may limit PARPi efficacy after platinum failure. Clinical trial information: NCT02163694 . [Table: see text]

1091 Background: In BROCADE3 (NCT02163694), addition of PARP inhibitor V to CP resulted in improved progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.71 [95% CI 0.57−0.88], p=0.002) in patients (pts) with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer and g BRCA1/2 mutation. A subset of pts transitioned to V/placebo (PL) monoTx at an intensified dose/schedule after CP discontinuation prior to progression (investigator discretion). Here, we evaluate the impact of this transition on efficacy and safety. Methods: Pts were randomized 2:1 to CP with V (n=337) or PL (n=172). V (120 mg po BID) or PL was given on Days (D) −2 to 5, C (AUC 6) on D1, and P (80 mg/m2) on D1, 8, and 15 (21-day cycles). Pts who transitioned to monoTx received V/PL 300-400mg BID daily until progression. A Cox model with a time varying covariate indicating transition from V/PL with CP to V/PL monoTx was fit to estimate treatment effect during combination and monoTx phases. PFS by cycles of CP prior to monoTx and AEs during monoTx are summarized. Results: A subgroup of 136 (40%) and 58 (34%) pts on the V and PL arms, respectively, received monoTx. When a Cox model with a time-varying covariate was fit for PFS (per investigator), the nominal P-value for treatment by covariate interaction was 0.038. The HRs (95% CI) for V vs PL during combination therapy and monoTx were 0.81 (0.62–1.06) and 0.49 (0.33–0.73). The Table summarizes PFS by cycles of C and/or P prior to monoTx. Common AEs (>20% of pts) during V or PL monoTx were nausea (52%/10%), fatigue (23%/12%), headache (21%/17%), and diarrhea (21%/9%). Seizures (2.2%/0%) were reported during monoTx. Rates of cytopenias for V or PL monoTx were: anemia 12%/14%; neutropenia 13%/12%; and thrombocytopenia 10%/5%. Conclusions: These analyses suggest that pts treated with V + CP derive benefit from both combination therapy as well as V monoTx after CP discontinuation. Pts receiving V monoTx after ≤ 6 cycles of VCP experienced a similar benefit to those who transitioned to monoTx after 7–12 cycles of VCP, suggesting that V maintenance therapy may be suitable following a limited duration of combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02163694 . [Table: see text]

e12587 Background: In the phase 3 TAILORx study, the first invasive disease-free survival event (in all arms) was often opposite BC or other second primary cancer. Our goal was to investigate differences in the 21-gene RS results between the primary BC and a second primary BC, as well as the association with clinicopathological characteristics. Methods: This analysis of the prospectively-designed CHS registry included all CHS pts with estrogen receptor (ER)+ HER2-negative BC who underwent RS testing between 1/2006 and 6/2019 and for whom ≥2 RS results were identified which were > 1 year apart. Results: Of the 10,244 RS assays ordered in this time frame, 371 involved pts for whom the assay was performed at least twice. Our analysis focused on the 42 pts for whom the assays were performed > 1 year apart. All pts were females; 76% were initially diagnosed with node-negative BC; median (interquartile range [IQR]) age at first diagnosis was 56 (43-64) yrs. Tumor characteristics for the first and subsequent primary BC are presented (Table). The median time (IQR) between the first and latest RS assay was 4.5 (2.9-6.4) yrs. In 28 pts (67%), the latest primary BC was ipsilateral and in 14 (33%) it was contralateral. The median (IQR) difference between the first and latest RS value was 7 (1-12). The second/third primary BC had higher RS than the first BC in the majority (76%) of pts. Higher RS in the latest primary BC (compared to the first primary BC) was more common when the latest primary BC was ipsilateral than when it was contralateral (86% vs 57%, P= 0.04). Conclusions: In ER+ HER2-negative BC pts, second/third primary BC is generally associated with higher RS result (compared to the first primary BC), particularly if the later primary BC is ipsilateral. [Table: see text]

Population screening of three common BRCA1/BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jews (AJ) apparently fulfills screening criteria. We compared streamlined BRCA screening via self-referral with proactive recruitment in medical settings. Unaffected AJ, age ≥25 years without known familial mutations, were either self-referred or recruiter-enrolled. Before testing, participants received written information and self-reported family history (FH). After testing, both non-carriers with significant FH and carriers received in-person genetic counseling. Psychosocial questionnaires were self-administered 1 week and 6 months after enrollment. Of 1,771 participants, 58% were recruiter-enrolled and 42% were self-referred. Screening uptake was 67%. Recruited enrollees were older (mean age 54 vs. 48, P 90%). At 6 months, carriers had significantly increased distress and anxiety, greater knowledge, and similar satisfaction; 90% of participants would recommend general AJ BRCA screening. Streamlined BRCA screening results in high uptake, very high satisfaction, and no excess psychosocial harm. Proactive recruitment captured older women less selected for FH. Further research is necessary to target younger women and assess other populations. Genet Med advance online publication 08 December 2016

Background: Understanding resistance mechanisms to chemotherapy is key to improving therapeutic outcomes. Despite the considerable importance of tumor drug resistance to cancer morbidity and mortality, our comprehension of the various molecular mechanisms involved in resistance is limited. The actual response of an individual patient remains a ‘black box’. Previous studies profiling pre-and post-treatment samples were based on population statistics and did not result in a personalized view of resistance. To dissect the individualized emergence of resistance in breast cancer patients we applied longitudinal transcriptomics combined with temporal dynamics analysis approach. Methods: Matched triplets of archived tumor biopsies from pre-treatment, post-treatment and adjacent normal epithelium were collected from 33 individual patients that underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy treatment. Full transcriptome analysis was performed by mRNA sequencing. Longitudinal pattern analysis algorithm was developed to follow dynamic expression fluctuations in individual patients. Data analysis incorporated long-term clinical and pathological follow-up information. Pathway enrichment was used to map the resistant pathways and create a “chemo-resistome” map in individual patients by following the rewiring of their molecular pathways through the course of therapy. Results: To identify genes associated with resistance we used longitudinal pattern classification. Each pattern represents a different scenario through tumor progression and treatment stages. We identified 253 genes that their pattern is significantly correlated with pathological response score. Enrichment analysis of these genes pinpointed pathways and functions associated with resistance. We found multiple pathways directly related to the mechanism of action of the administered chemotherapies, such as, pathways involved in microtubule polymerization and DNA repair. Other pathways that emerge involve multi-drug resistance pathways, such as, specific subsets of ABC transporters and pathways related to immune-modulation. Interestingly, we noticed that the mechanisms of resistance are patient-specific. We, therefore, calculated a chemo-resistome map for each patient using the most potent resistant pathway categories. The chemo-resistome maps illustrate the co-existence of several resistance categories in the same patient, whereas some categories exhibit patient- or subtype- specific occurrence. Conclusions: Mapping the complexity of the various resistance pathways in individual patients can provide important insights on the mechanisms underlying tumor cell survival. Depicting an individual road map to resistance by analyzing expression rewiring can offer personalized therapeutic strategies in the future. Citation Format: Maya Dadiani, Gilgi Friedlander, Gili Perry, Nora Balint-Lahat, Anya Pavlovsky, Anjana Shenoy, Iris Barshack, Tamar Geiger, Bella Kaufman, Einav N Gal-Yam. Mapping a personalized chemo-resistome in breast cancer patients by longitudinal transcriptomics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P6-03-01.

Background: BROCADE3 (NCT02163694) evaluated the PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel (C/P) vs placebo + C/P in patients with HER2-negative locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation. In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, investigator-assessed median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.5 months for veliparib vs 12.6 months for placebo (hazard ratio=0.71 [95% CI 0.57-0.88], p=0.002); 75th percentile PFS was 39.9 months for veliparib vs 20.7 months for placebo. In this preplanned analysis, we evaluated efficacy and safety of veliparib plus C/P in patients with no previous cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Methods: Patients with ≤2 prior lines of cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer were randomized 2:1 to C/P with veliparib or C/P with placebo. Veliparib (120 mg p.o. BID) or placebo was given on Days −2 to 5, C (AUC 6 mg/mL/min IV) on Day 1, and P (80 mg/m2 IV) on Days 1, 8, and 15 (21-day cycles). Patients who discontinued both C and P for toxicity or reasons other than disease progression could continue veliparib/placebo monotherapy until progression. Monotherapy dose was 300 mg BID, increasing to 400 mg BID if tolerated. Although randomization was not stratified by lines of prior cytotoxic chemotherapy, the treatment arms were well-balanced with respect to this baseline characteristic. The primary endpoint was PFS as assessed by investigator. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and objective response rate (ORR). Adverse events were monitored throughout the study. Analysis of PFS in patients with no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease was pre-planned. Results: In the ITT population, 337 patients (81% of the entire cohort) received treatment as first line and were randomized to veliparib plus C/P and 172 patients to placebo plus C/P. Most patients received prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the neo-adjuvant/adjuvant setting (66%, placebo plus C/P; 70%, veliparib plus C/P). Among the 81% of patients in each arm who had no prior cytotoxic chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, median PFS was longer in patients receiving veliparib plus C/P compared to placebo plus C/P (16.6 mo vs 13.1 mo), and median PFS for both arms was over 1 year (Table). Proportion of patients with a serious AE was 30.9% for placebo plus C/P and 33.1% for veliparib plus C/P; proportion with an AE leading to study drug discontinuation was 10.8% for placebo plus C/P and 15.6% for veliparib plus C/P. Additional safety data will be presented. Conclusions: In patients with HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer and a germline BRCA1/2 mutation who had no prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease, veliparib with C/P demonstrated an improvement in median PFS over C/P alone. This benefit was durable with 25% of patients alive and progression free at nearly 4 years. Table. Efficacy in patients with no prior cytotoxic chemotherapy for metastatic disease.Veliparib + C/P, n=274Placebo + C/P, n=139mPFS per INV (mo, 95% CI)16.6 (13.4, 18.7)13.1 (11.4, 14.5)PFS HR (95% CI)0.69 (0.54, 0.88)PFS 75th percentile (mo, 95% CI)46.3 (29.3, NR)22.6 (16.5, 27.2)mPFS per ICR (mo, 95% CI)21.5 (18.7, 29.2)14.0 (12.5, 16.5)PFS HR (95% CI)0.63 (0.47, 0.84)PFS 75th percentile (mo, 95% CI)NR33.3 (19.7, NR)mOS (mo, 95% CI) [interim]36.0 (32.0, 43.1)29.9 (26.0, 39.3)OS HR (95% CI)0.92 (0.68, 1.2)CBR at 24 weeks (% [95% CI])92.8 (90.0, 94.9)93.4 (89.1, 96.0)ORR (% [95% CI])79.7 (74.0, 84.7)76.3 (67.4, 83.8) C/P, carboplatin and paclitaxel; CBR, clinical benefit rate; HR, hazard ratio; m, median; mo, months; NR, not reached; ORR, objective response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; INV, investigator; ICR, independent central review. Citation Format: Banu K. Arun, Hyo S. Han, Bella Kaufman, Hans Wildiers, Michael Friedlander, Jean-Pierre Ayoub, Shannon L. Puhalla, Bruce A. Bach, Matthew Dudley, Christine K. Ratajczak, David Maag, Véronique Diéras. First-line veliparib plus carboplatin/paclitaxel in patients with HER2-negative advanced/metastatic gBRCA-associated breast cancer: Planned subgroup analysis from the phase 3 BROCADE3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-01.