Search

The present study aims to extend the applicability of the static-boundary absorption method in phase-resolving CFD simulations outside the conventional shallow-water waves limit. Even though this method was originally formulated for shallow-water waves based on the conventional piston type wavemaker, extending its use to deeper water conditions provides a more practical and computationally cost efficient solution compared to other available numerical wave absorption alternatives. For this sake, absorption of unidirectional monochromatic waves in a semi-infinite flume by means of a static wall is investigated theoretically and numerically. Moreover, implementation to a practical wave-structure interaction application is investigated numerically and experimentally. A phase-resolving numerical model based on the Reynold-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations is implemented using the open source C++ toolbox OpenFOAM. The study presents the performance of the static-boundary method, in a dimensionless manner, by limiting the depth at which the active-absorption conventional-piston velocity profile is introduced; as a function of incident wave conditions. Moreover, it is shown that the performance of the static-boundary method can be significantly enhanced where wave reflection was reduced to about half of that of the conventional setup in deep-water conditions. Furthermore, the absorption depth is correlated to the incident wave conditions; providing an optimization framework for the selection of the proper dimensions of an absorbing wall. Finally, wave-structure interaction experimental tests were conducted to validate the numerical model performance; which shows an acceptable agreement between the model and the experimental observations. The proposed limiter is straight forward to be applied in pre-existing wave-structure interaction CFD solvers, without the need of code modifications., Comment: 23 pages, 17 figures, 5 tables

The paper by Beya et al. (2012, hereinafter BPB) has a general title of Turbulence Beneath Finite Amplitude Water Waves, but is solely dedicated to discussing the experiment by Babanin and Haus (2009, hereinafter BH) who conducted measurements of wave-induced non-breaking turbulence by particle image velocimetry (PIV). The authors of BPB conclude that their observations contradict those of BH. Here we argue that the outcomes of BPB do not contradict BH. In addition, although the main conclusion of BPB is that there is no turbulence observed in their experiment, it actually is observed., Comment: 10 pages, 1 figure