1. The Short-Term Compliance and Concordance to in Clinic Testing for Tablet-Based Home Monitoring in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
- Author
-
Elizabeth K Baglin, Robyn H. Guymer, George Kong, Selwyn Marc Prea, Algis J. Vingrys, and Pyrawy Sharangan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,business.industry ,Concordance ,Reproducibility of Results ,Macular degeneration ,medicine.disease ,Retina ,Confidence interval ,Compliance (psychology) ,Term (time) ,Macular Degeneration ,Ophthalmology ,Quartile ,Age related ,medicine ,Physical therapy ,Humans ,Visual Field Tests ,Lead (electronics) ,business - Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the short-term compliance with regular home monitoring of macular retinal sensitivity (RS) in intermediate age-related macular degeneration (iAMD). Home-based outcomes were compared with in-clinic outcomes determined using (1) the same tablet device under supervision, and (2) the Macular Integrity Assessment (MaIA) microperimeter.Single-center longitudinal compliance and reliability study.A total of 73 participants with iAMD were trained to perform macular field testing with the Melbourne Rapid Fields-macular (MRF-m) iPad application. Volunteers were asked to return 6 weekly tests from home, guided by audio instructions. We determined compliance with weekly testing and surveyed for factors that limited compliance. Test reliability (false positive, false negative) and RS were compared to in-clinic assays (MaIA). Data are given as mean ± SD or as median [quartile 1-3 range]. Group comparisons were achieved with bootstrap to define the 95% confidence limits.A total of 59 participants submitted 6 home examinations with a median intertest interval of 8.0 [7.0-17] days. Compliance with weekly testing (7 days ±24 hours) was 55%. The main barrier to compliance was information technology (IT) logistic reasons. Of 694 home examinations submitted, 96% were reliable (false-positive results25%). The mean RS returned by the tablet was significantly higher (+3.2 dB, P.05) compared to the MaIA.Home monitoring produces reliable results that differ from in-clinic tests because of test design. This should not affect self-monitoring once an at-home baseline is established, but these differences will affect comparisons with in-clinic outcomes. Reasonable compliance with weekly testing was achieved. Improved IT support might lead to better compliance.
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF