Search

Background The large-scale clinical problem caused by unacceptable tribological behaviour of certain large diameter metal-on-metal prosthetic hips has directed attention to adverse condition testing. High metal-on-metal wear is connected with adverse reaction to metal debris. Friction is important because high friction may be associated with high wear, risk the fixation of the cup, and cause detrimental heating of periprosthetic tissues. Methods A friction measurement system was added to a multidirectional, established hip joint wear simulator, and its functionality was evaluated. In preliminary tests, a 50 mm diameter metal-on-metal prosthesis was tested in an optimal acetabular cup inclination angle (48°) and in a steep angle (70°) using a normal peak load (2 kN) and an increased peak load (3 kN). The test length was 100 h. Long-term adverse condition tests of 3 million cycles were run for three 52 mm metal-on-metal prostheses. The lubricant was diluted calf serum at 37 °C. Findings In the 100 h tests, metal-on-metal frictional torque was not highly sensitive to the angle, load and serum degradation, and it was close to that of a conventional 28 mm prosthesis with a polyethylene cup, mostly below 5 Nm. However, a manyfold higher frictional torque (10 to 20 Nm) was observed in long-term metal-on-metal tests with substantial wear. Interpretation To obtain a realistic prediction of the frictional behaviour of a hip design, long-term, multidirectional wear tests are necessary. The friction should preferably be measured during the wear test. In addition to normal conditions, adverse condition testing is strongly recommended.

Being one of the most successful surgeries in the history of medicine, the indications for total hip arthroplasty have widened and are increasingly being offered to younger and fitter patients. This has also led to high expectations for longevity and outcomes. Acetabular cup position has a significant impact on the results of hip arthroplasty as it affects dislocation, abductor muscle strength, gait, limb lengths, impingement, noise generation, range of motion (ROM), wear, loosening, and cup failure. The variables in cup position are depth, height, and angular position (anteversion and inclination). The implications of change in depth of center of rotation (COR) are medialized versus anatomical positioning. As opposed to traditional medialization with beneficial effects on joint reaction force, the advantages of an anatomical position are increasingly recognized. The maintained acetabular offset offers advantages in terms of ROM, impingement, cortical rim press fit, and maintaining medial bone stock. The height of COR influences muscle activity and limb lengths and available bone stock for cup support. On the other hand, ideal angular position remains a matter of much debate and reliably achieving a target angular position remains elusive. This is not helped by variations in the way we describe angular position, with operative, radiologic, or anatomic definitions being used variably to describe anteversion and inclination. Furthermore, pelvic tilt plays a major role in functional positions of the acetabulum. In addition, commonly used techniques of positioning often do not inform us of the real orientation of the pelvis on operating table, with possibility of significant adduction, flexion, and external rotation of the pelvis being possibilities. This review article brings together the evidence on cup positioning and aims to provide a systematic and pragmatic approach in achieving the best position in individual cases.

In some earlier hip simulator studies of large-diameter metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prostheses high, unexplained variation in wear has been observed. In the present study it was found that high variation occurs when the tribological endurance limit of the MoM device in question is being approached. When the limit is exceeded, high wear takes place uniformly, and the variation is low. Below the limit, both the wear and its variation are low. The endurance limit was exceeded by increasing the peak load from 2 kN to 3 kN, to simulate obesity. The acetabular cup inclination angle was high, 70°. Potential clinical wear problems can be predicted by hip simulator studies provided that relevant adverse test conditions are included.

Despite inaccuracies due to artifact and variations in patient positioning, anteroposterior (AP) radiographs remain the clinical standard for post-operative evaluation of component placement following total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, cup position, specifically anteversion, can be significantly affected by variations in patient positioning on an X-ray. A major cause of such artifact is unaccounted for pelvic tilt. Several methods for correcting the effects of pelvic tilt on radiographic anteversion have been proposed, with varying degrees of accuracy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of a commonly referenced method for correcting acetabular cup anteversion in a cohort undergoing total hip arthroplasty and determine its appropriateness for use in this population of patients. Radiographs from patients who underwent primary or revision hip arthroplasty between February 2016 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Corrected anteversion was calculated by measuring the vertical distance between the symphysis pubis and the sacrococcygeal joint, per the method outlined by Tannast et al. This symphococcygeal distance was then applied to Tannast’s nomograms to calculate the magnitude of pelvic tilt. Corrected and uncorrected anteversion values were compared to anteversion values collected intraoperatively using an imageless computer-assisted navigation device. A total of 71 cases were initially eligible for inclusion in the study. The correction method could not be applied in 44% (31/71) of the cases, chiefly due to difficulties in visualizing the required landmarks. In cases where it could be applied, corrected values correlated very poorly with navigation measurements (r = -0.07). Mean corrected anteversion (36.9°, SD: 7.4°) differed from uncorrected anteversion (25.2°, SD: 7.6°) by an average of 13.5° (p

© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Background The purpose of this study is to measure acetabular cup position and wear of the highly crosslinked polyethylene liner in the supine and standing position for patients at a minimum of 10 years after the operation. Methods A total of 38 patients were recruited at a mean of 12.5 years after the operation. All patients received a single acetabular cup design with a highly crosslinked liner and a 28-mm cobalt-chromium femoral head. Patients underwent supine and standing radiostereometric examinations in which the X-ray sources and detectors were positioned to obtain an anterior-posterior and cross-table lateral radiograph. Acetabular cup position and the three-dimensional wear rate were measured from the radiographs, and outcome scores were recorded for each patient. Results Anteversion significantly increased (P