Search

Rural settlements are places where agricultural and livestock farming activities are carried out, have a relatively low population density, industrial and commercial activities do not develop and directly take form by human, environmental, and cultural interaction. Rural dwellings and add-ons constitute the characteristic texture of rural settlements. Rural dwellings can be defined as not only housing places, but also places where many activities are carried out and include add-ons with storage and production volumes based on the economic activity of the owner of the dwelling and the requirements of the region. These add-ons form the plan design of the residences (as closed, semi-open, and open spaces) depending on the living conditions of the region and the needs of the users. With these qualities, rural dwellings are sustainable structures that reflect the natural and human characteristics of the environment. However, in line with the economic and sociocultural developments experienced today, the influence of user behaviors and life habits is gradually decreasing in space design, and the uniform formation attracts attention. Although this situation does not pose much of a problem in terms of living dynamics in urban settlements, especially actions affecting the organization of space and not taking into account living habits cause different problems and pose a risk to the sustainability of dwellings in rural settlements. In order for the structures not to become unidentified and lose their characteristics of belonging to the place, it is necessary to pay attention to the climate, topography, and use of local materials in the new buildings, as well as to analyze all add-ons related to the actions performed by the users in the housing, especially in rural dwellings. If this factor affecting the formation is ignored, the dwelling will be 1 insufficient to respond to the needs of the user due to the living dynamics of the region where it is built, and this condition will negatively affect both spatial and sociocultural continuity. For this reason, in this study, the add-ons belonging to rural dwellings determined by inventory studies carried out within the scope of the master's thesis study titled "A Research on Rural Dwellings and Their Add-ons: The Case of Tongurlar Village" were analyzed in terms of function, plan characteristics, construction system, and material, and the types of add-ons affecting the dwelling organization were examined. The fact that the buildings that approach the dwelling with today's spatial perception only to meet the need for housing The fact that the buildings that approach the dwelling with today's spatial perception only to meet the need for housing alone cannot respond to the living dynamics of the settlement and do acquire add-ons over time was explained through the new dwellings located in Tongurlar Village. Moreover it has been revealed that the type projects prepared by authorized institutions for those who want to build their own housing in the rural, although it is mentioned that they are compatible with the vernacular architecture and living conditions, are produced without considering the add-ons, and it is stated that this may cause sustainability problems. In the conclusion part, solution suggestions for the problem are presented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rural areas in Turkey are undergoing significant transformations, but not as much as cities. Rural areas are evolving in many aspects, including land use, economic structure, and lifestyles. Rural housing is one of the most important indicators of change. The migration of rural dwellings from settlement centers causes the settlement pattern to loosen and disperse, similar to urban sprawl. Thus, existing agricultural/livestock lands and natural elements are changing and transforming. The change/transformation process that rural areas undergo as a whole is conceptualized as “new rurality” in the literature. The adoption of the “dual lifestyle” and the “urban lifestyle” in the countryside, which are indicators of the new rurality, has increased the demand for “country residence” and “second homes” in the countryside. Thus, more housing is being built in areas near major transportation axes, particularly near cities and in rural areas. Making suitability analyses and creating projections by employing geographical data in the selection of the locations of these newly built houses is important for the future of existing agricultural areas and rural planning. Performing site selection analyses with different methods demonstrates the advantages of one method over the others and provides more accurate analyses. In this study, logistic regression (LR), analytical hierarchy process (AHP), and frequency ratio (FO) methods were used for site selection suitability analysis. The study area, Keban Stream Basin, is located in the northwest of Elazig, within the borders of the Keban district. The basin has a surface area of approximately 187 km2 . According to the results on the maps, the basin has an average land area of 12.5 km², which is suitable for new rural housing construction. Although each model has its advantages, the LR and FO methods produced more suitable results than the AHP method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]